News from the president: a nuclear-powered cruise missile

312
The main news of the last days are connected with the Message of the President of Russia to the Federal Assembly. In his two-hour speech, the head of state addressed a variety of topics, including the rearmament of strategic nuclear forces. Vladimir Putin revealed some information about the most daring projects weapons, including a fundamentally new. All these projects, for one reason or another, are of great interest for professionals and the public. This time we will consider the announced project of a promising cruise missile with unlimited flight range.

Starting his story about promising systems for strategic nuclear forces, V. Putin recalled the events of recent years. At the beginning of the last decade, the United States unilaterally withdrew from the anti-ballistic missile treaty, and then began the construction of new military facilities. The deployment of missile defense systems on land and at sea threatened Russian nuclear forces. For this reason, our country was forced to start developing fundamentally new weapons, whose potential does not depend on the enemy’s anti-missile systems. Very interesting results have been obtained so far in this area.




Cruise missile launcher


According to V. Putin, the Russian defense industry was not limited to the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles alone and created not only the Sarmat complex. The development of new types of weapons that do not use a ballistic trajectory was launched. Thus, such weapons in principle cannot be intercepted by modern missile defense.

At the heart of one of the strategic armament projects are the most daring developments of Russian scientists. An unnamed research institution was able to develop a super-power small-sized nuclear power plant (NPI). According to the president, such a product can be marked in the body of a cruise missile like the Russian X-101 or American Tomahawk. New power plant gives such weapons uniquely high performance.

V. Putin stated that the new nuclear power plant, having a small size, makes it possible to increase the rocket range by a factor of ten compared with traditional engines. In practice, the range is unlimited. Combined with a number of other unique features, the new power plant gives the rocket unique opportunities.

A promising product, as the president said, should fly at a low altitude and carry a nuclear warhead. In the development of the airframe rocket used so-called. stealth technology, reducing its visibility for the detection of the enemy. The missile must fly an unpredictable route, bypassing the zone of responsibility of air defense. Being an aerodynamic goal, it is not under the responsibility of missile defense. Thus, a promising missile cannot be intercepted by existing and prospective air and missile defense systems.


Product start


The head of state said that the promising ammunition had already been tested. At the end of last year, the successful launch of a rocket with nuclear power plants took place at the Central Test Site of the Russian Federation. During the flight, the power plant developed the required power and provided the necessary engine thrust. The test launch was successful and confirmed the prospects for new technologies.

Ground tests and test runs, which ended with the desired results, allow you to continue work. V. Putin pointed out that now the defense industry can start creating a fundamentally new weapon - a strategic complex with a rocket equipped with a nuclear power plant.

It is curious that the new cruise missile, as well as a number of other new developments presented by V. Putin, has not yet been officially named. However, measures have already been taken to eliminate this flaw. The President said that in the near future, everyone can make their proposals in the field of names of promising weapons. Shortly after his speech on the official website of the Ministry of Defense, a corresponding section appeared. In the near future while the nameless weapon will receive new names.

In the past, the Message to the Federal Assembly was only read out by the President. This time the speech of the head of state was accompanied by videos showing promising domestic weapons. Real surveys from polygons and computer graphics clearly showed the work and operating principles of the latest systems. One of these clips was shown after statements about a promising cruise missile.


The initial stage of the flight. Apparently, while the starting engine is running


The video begins with a demonstration of the test run. An inclined tubular launcher was installed at the test site, from which a rocket flew out with the noise of a starting engine. After the missile left, a large cloud of characteristic smoke remained above the launch position. The rocket abruptly gained speed and altitude, hiding in the clouds. Then they showed a rocket in the air. The product flew at a given height, leaving behind a barely noticeable plume of smoke. With the help of computer graphics, it was shown how a rocket can move at low altitude with a bend around the terrain.

Also in the video included a demonstration of the unique characteristics of the flight range, also performed using graphics. The drawn rocket launched from the range on the Novaya Zemlya archipelago, passed between Iceland and Greenland, and then headed south. The route of the rocket rounded the air defense positional areas off the east coast of North America and in the central part of the Atlantic Ocean. Through the Drake Strait, a rocket hit the Pacific Ocean and headed north to its target.

Unfortunately, specialists and military enthusiasts, President V. Putin has not yet announced the technical details of a promising project. In addition, leaves much to be desired quality of documentary shots. However, in this case it is possible to consider a new rocket and make some assumptions.


Cruise missile in flight


Judging by the published frames, the nameless rocket with nuclear power plants has a cigar-shaped body of great elongation, on the sides of which there are cylindrical additional covers of smaller sizes. The rocket has a swept wing with a small chord length, and in the tail is a plumage with a developed ventral crest. Planes made collapsible and before exiting the launcher do not protrude beyond the basic structures.

For obvious reasons, the nuclear power plant represents the greatest interest in the new project. All that is known about this system is that it is minimal in size and was inscribed in a body the size of an X-101 rocket. Other details were not disclosed, but the main features of the power plant are visible on the published video.

In the aviation or cruise missiles, the atomic energy was proposed to be used in different ways. Based on the results of many research programs, the optimal option was chosen, providing for the construction of a special nuclear jet engine (NRE). The "classic" versions of the NRE, proposed back in the middle of the last century, are similar to jet engines, but differ in the source of energy. Instead of a combustion chamber for liquid fuel, it is proposed to use a nuclear reactor or an associated heat exchanger in them.

During the operation of such an engine, the atmospheric air entering through the intake is in contact with the heated reactor vessel or heat exchanger, receiving energy from it. The heated air flows through the turbine and the nozzle, creating the required thrust. In the distant past, in our country and abroad, designs of airplanes with such a power plant were proposed, but none of them came to practical use. The main problem lay in the need to organize sufficient biological protection for the required power reactor. Such means turned out to be too large and heavy for airplanes, and therefore did not allow to implement bold plans.


North America Air Defense Bypass Option


In the video shown, you can see that the promising cruise missile YARD is located in the hull and side covers of the fuselage. Apparently, there are air-jet systems, receiving heat energy from a nuclear power plant. The heated air, in turn, is emitted through the tail nozzles of the shrouds.

There is every reason to believe that the rocket has not only a nuclear power plant. A characteristic cloud of smoke at startup indicates the use of a solid-fuel starter engine. Probably, after reaching the required speed, it is reset, and then the rocket flies only at the expense of the YARD. Atomic power plants, showing high power, are distinguished by high fuel economy. Precisely because of this, the cruise missile, allegedly, is tens of times longer than existing systems in flight range. However, the estimated or actual range indicators have not yet been clarified. It is known that the X-101 cruise missile has a range of more than 5 thousand km, and it remains only to guess how much a new product can fly with a nuclear power unit.

A significant increase in flight range in comparison with existing samples gives the prospective rocket obvious advantages. First of all, the requirements for the placement of the firing position of the launcher are reduced. If there is no specific time limit for striking a missile, it can launch from any point on the planet and then head to any area. With no practical limitations on the range, the route can be not only optimal and shortest. Using data on enemy positional air defense areas, the calculation of the missile complex can build a favorable trajectory that precludes timely detection of a flying missile. Thus, a blow to the enemy will be unexpected and powerful.

According to the President of Russia, a promising cruise missile, attributable to the field of strategic weapons, is equipped with a nuclear warhead. Like other products of similar classes, it could receive a conventional charge, but its use is not entirely appropriate. Obviously, after the detonation of the warhead and the destruction of the rocket will be followed by the release of nuclear fuel with known consequences. A special warhead, in turn, removes a rocket from the so-called category. dirty weapons. In addition, equipping a rocket with an unlimited flight range with a non-strategic charge looks like a real waste and not very meaningful consumption of very valuable items.


Due to the unlimited range of the rocket will be able to fly the most convenient route


Historians of weapons and military equipment, as well as the interested public, are well aware that the idea of ​​a nuclear engine for an airplane or a rocket appeared a few decades ago. Moreover, the leading countries tried to create real equipment with such equipment. However, none of the bold projects have progressed beyond the testing phase. For this reason, the newest Russian cruise missile with NPIs in the near future will be able to earn the honorary title of a technical breakthrough.

Speaking about the latest rocket, President V. Putin noted that not a single foreign country currently has such systems. Not without irony, he added that perhaps someday such developments will appear, but by this time Russian scientists and designers will have time to provide our country with another advantage.

Indeed, as far as is known, even the leading foreign countries have long abandoned the idea of ​​a nuclear jet engine and have not worked on such products for several decades. Russia, using existing experience and the latest technology, could not only develop a product of this kind, but also bring it to the test. Moreover, the checks were carried out not only on the stands, but also on board a full-fledged experimental rocket. Already this fact can be considered a great success.

One of the main advantages of a promising missile is the ability to build the most profitable route that provides an effective breakthrough of enemy air defense and missile defense zones. Thus, while the nameless rocket turns out to be the most interesting element of the strategic deterrence system. Due to the limited speed and relatively large flight time, it cannot be a first-strike vehicle, but its use in a retaliatory order will allow you to get the best results. One can only guess how exactly foreign countries will react to the appearance of such weapons with unique characteristics and capabilities in Russia.



At the moment, it is only known that the promising cruise missile with NPI has passed some tests. According to the results of these inspections, as V. Putin stated, the development of a full-fledged strategic missile complex, designed to strengthen Russian nuclear forces, may begin.

When the development work will be completed and the army will receive the latest designs with unique capabilities - is unknown. So far, the country's military and political leadership has decided not to share with the public the main part of information about the most important project. However, new reports on promising developments, as often happens, may appear in the very near future. In the meantime, waiting for the news, you can turn on the fantasy and offer your version of the name for the rocket. The Ministry of Defense is now accepting ideas from everyone.

Not without pride in the national defense science and industry, it should be noted that the promising cruise missile with a nuclear power plant was not the only novelty in the recent speech of the president. Vladimir Putin also spoke about other promising weapons systems, including fundamentally new ones for our country and the world as a whole.


Based on:
http://kremlin.ru/
http://tass.ru/
http://ria.ru/
http://vz.ru/
http://rg.ru/
312 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    4 March 2018 06: 19
    Our partners can only take our word for it, I hope their baggage of knowledge will be enough to comprehend everything they saw and said.
    1. +8
      4 March 2018 06: 55
      Quote: ul_vitalii
      Our partners can only take our word for it, I hope their knowledge will be enough to comprehend everything they saw and said.
      Nothing like this! Western crazy "at * urki" from their aggressive intentions will not back down! Moreover, their financial masterminds and owners secretly set up for themselves as a "chosen" a bunch of anti-nuclear bomb shelters in the most secluded corners of the planet and hope to survive in the nuclear apocalypse of reformatting humanity to continue their dominance over the world.
      1. +6
        4 March 2018 23: 46
        Quote: Tatiana
        Nothing like this! Western crazy "at * urki" from their aggressive intentions will not back down!

        ... naturally ... as they have been doing since century IX regarding Russia ... this is not new under the moon, but they will have to postpone their Drang nah Osten another 20-30 years ... in view of the current circumstances ... and the specifically discussed "Product" including ... and in general, why are We all gathered today ?! ... discuss the Product ... a, Geopolitical layouts, in this case are secondary ... Here I am, as a person with an engineering mindset ... the technical details are interesting and they are on the surface ... what we see:
        - booster solid fuel stage for start-up, in stock
        - marching solid fuel, while the reactor enters the "critical mode" (stable chain reaction) in stock
        - configuration and geometry of X-101/102, available
        ... Hats off to Russian engineers ... hi
        ... what's the point ... an atomic reactor, it’s not a light that lit up if you clicked the switch and there will be Light ... in its case there will be an Atomic Boom then ... the reactor starts slowly ... a neutron source is introduced into the core , the critical mass of fission begins to slowly accumulate in conjunction with the fuel rod, to ensure a chain reaction, but here you need not to miss the moment when you turn on the circulation system of the coolant-coolant ... but this is not all, you need to regulate what the chain reaction is in given parameters ... or y with melted AZ (active zone) or you lose output power ... and all this was decided by the dimensions of X-101/102 ... and there was still room for warhead, avionics, GOS, SNRTR ... and it is quite possible electronic warfare. .. Bravo! ... hi
        1. +15
          5 March 2018 04: 23
          And in the rocket there was a place for an unlimited amount of fuel and noodle pans on the ears of the electorate.
          laughing
          Well mixed up 1 March with 1 April, with whom it does not happen ..
          1. 0
            5 March 2018 11: 09
            Thor
            Inok10
            And in the rocket there was a place for an unlimited amount of fuel and noodle pans on the ears of the electorate. laughing
            Well mixed up 1 March with 1 April, with whom it does not happen ..

            Ha! You guys are funny! drinks You definitely won't get bored! Yes
          2. +2
            5 March 2018 13: 05
            For nuclear fuel, a lot of space is not needed.
            You probably wanted to say what will be the working fluid?
            Answer.
            As I understand it, the working fluid is the atmosphere, which is heated by an atomic reactor and heated and expanded is ejected through the nozzle of the engine.
            1. +1
              5 March 2018 14: 54
              I would not deceive myself that "now there will be no war for 20-30 years." Given the practical state of the bankruptcy of the aggregate West and the fact that they have already started everything ... In general, 2-3 years (if we have them) will be the most difficult. For what we have demonstrated has not yet been massively in the troops and strike ahead - the eternal temptation of our enemies. Hitler did just that, he pulled another year and a half and he had no chance at all.
              Apparently (and even obvious) that now they will let the frenzied Ukrainians go down to the Donbass, sway something during the elections (right up to the terrorist attacks and the appearance of their PMCs in Russia), something will be really bad in Kazakhstan ... they will go to the last and decisive ... but hopeless, for we will hit on the head. A head overseas.
              1. +2
                5 March 2018 18: 26
                Alexey Sommer
                As I understand it, the working fluid is the atmosphere, which is heated by an atomic reactor


                If the atmosphere will be the working fluid, leaving MHC for now), we will estimate the thermodynamics of the process: in order to obtain thrust comparable to the turbojet engine, the working fluid (air) must be heated to comparable temperatures. This is about 2000 C. This means that air must be directly driven through the reactor core, which, for such heating, should be much higher.
                But modern reactors even at temperatures around 1700 go into a supercritical state (molten fuel elements with absorbers) i.e. into a thermal explosion!

                Ingenious! This aerofukushima doesn't even need warheads!

                Maybe they just forgot to tell the Federal Assembly that the reactor is turning on over the target? ..
                laughinglaughinglaughing
              2. +2
                5 March 2018 22: 04
                Quote: bayard
                I would not deceive myself that "now there will be no war for 20-30 years." Given the practical state of the bankruptcy of the aggregate West and the fact that they have already started everything ...

                ... after March 1, these are their personal problems ... now they will not solve them at the expense of Russia ... or Birmingham will become a port city ... laughing ...
            2. The comment was deleted.
        2. +4
          5 March 2018 05: 27
          Alex, welcome hi
          And here's the question that arose in connection with the tests - how the reactor is "quenched" and how after the flight a missile was received for further study. Well, it’s not flooded in the ocean? recourse
        3. KCA
          +2
          5 March 2018 15: 24
          It is not necessary for the reactor to always operate in full heat (pre-critical) mode, only the fast neutron reactor with sodium as the heat carrier is suitable in size, the main thing in the standby mode is that the sodium does not solidify, and with a small RBN appetite for fuel, the standby time can last for many years
          1. 0
            5 March 2018 21: 59
            Quote: Svarog51
            Alex, welcome

            ... Mutually Sergey ... hi
            Quote: Svarog51
            And here's the question that arose in connection with the tests - how the reactor is "quenched" and how after the flight a missile was received for further study.

            ... who knows, maybe just fill AZ with a "prototype" sample ... I doubt that a "blanking" system is needed on a "real" one ... hi
            Quote: Svarog51
            Well, it’s not flooded in the ocean?

            ... as an option, but at the right point ... in fact, what is there to study in the construct? ... telemetry and the data of internal parameters during the flight are important ... the truth must have gotten later, away from sin ... but what thread Rybolov catches and goes nuts ... laughing
            Quote: KCA
            It is not necessary for the reactor to always operate in full heat (pre-critical) mode, only the fast neutron reactor with sodium as the heat carrier is suitable in size, the main thing in the standby mode is that the sodium does not solidify, and with a small RBN appetite for fuel, the standby time can last for many years

            ... it is not safe to have a reactor in storage, albeit in a subcritical state ... the start-up of the reactor is clearly after take-off ... what was even more surprising ... that is, reaching the critical mode should be no more than 60 minutes. ... the march stage on traditional fuel is clearly visible in the photo ...

            ... at this time, it is just entering the critical mode of poison ... moreover, it is universal for both the KR and the Underwater vehicle ... based on:
            In Russia, tests of a small-sized nuclear power plant for cruise missiles and autonomous underwater vehicles were completed, a military diplomatic source said.
            RIA Novosti https://ria.ru/arms/20180303/1515691052.html
            ... most likely the assembly is not zirconium and the fuel is not dioxide, there are more interesting options ... well, and the coolant is natural ... wink
    2. +52
      4 March 2018 08: 59
      Quote: ul_vitalii
      Our partners can only take our word for it, I hope their baggage of knowledge will be enough to comprehend everything they saw and said.

      No one could give a greater gift to the bourgeois military-industrial complex. Especially the cartoon with the bombing of Florida. The Americans unsuccessfully forced their NATO partners to bring military spending to the promised 2% of GDP. Now the figure in 3% does not look fantastic.
      Supporters of real sanctions against Russia also received a trump card. Now they will shake pictures at every corner like on bourgeois equipment (CNC machines, machining centers, etc.) Russia is creating weapons.

      No boring time is coming. Those who believe that it’s bad right now will soon begin to miss the present. Seize the moment, colleagues, and enjoy the present. hi
      1. +22
        4 March 2018 09: 20
        It is strange that the professor in the cartoon saw Florida, and not Tel Aviv. By the way, professor, do not tell me that Florida has valuable nuclear weapons?
        1. +20
          4 March 2018 09: 31
          Quote: sabakina
          It is strange that the professor in the cartoon saw Florida, and not Tel Aviv. By the way, professor, do not tell me that Florida has valuable nuclear weapons?

          I see what is shown there, and not what it seems to me. What is valuable in Florida, you need to ask your "animators" who sent warheads to American St. Petersburg.
          27 ° 54'40.10 "N
          81 ° 39'39.14 "W
          1. +5
            4 March 2018 09: 38
            a flaw, of course, it was necessary - to California, to Hollywood
          2. +23
            4 March 2018 09: 40
            Nifigase, the professor even figured out cartoonish coordinates! All the boys, we disagree, professor burdock, but the equipment with him, with him! laughing
            By the way, professor, what do you think the multipliers should have sent to?
            R.S. Journalist Matthew Lee did not see what you are talking about.
            1. +14
              4 March 2018 09: 54
              Quote: sabakina
              By the way, professor, what do you think the multipliers should have sent to?

              Going nowhere. The State Department has already voiced the picture of Florida to the joy of "lovers" of Russia. A couple more firewood in the furnace of the arms race and the new Cold War. Prev to the aluminum king Derepaska personally from the old Trump did not take long to wait.

              Quote: sabakina
              R.S. Journalist Matthew Lee did not see what you are talking about.

              But the State Department saw, and with them, Congress and the Senate.

              Quote: Spade
              Yes, for the sake of Florida’s safety, Europeans will cover all costs.

              Florida is the alternate aerodrome of the Russian, not European elite. Europeans have already increased spending on weapons and are going to stop there.
              1. +9
                4 March 2018 10: 12
                Oleg, do you naively think that our country will continue to tolerate lies from your overseas corefans, or who do you have to the USA there?
                1. +7
                  4 March 2018 14: 03
                  Quote: Herkulesich
                  Oleg, do you naively think that our country will continue to tolerate lies from your overseas corefans, or who do you have to the USA there?

                  I’m not Oleg, but I would like to ask, what will the Russian Federation do if the West remains within the framework of the economic war?
                  1. Oml
                    +3
                    4 March 2018 14: 36
                    Quote: Aaron Zawi
                    Quote: Herkulesich
                    Oleg, do you naively think that our country will continue to tolerate lies from your overseas corefans, or who do you have to the USA there?

                    I’m not Oleg, but I would like to ask, what will the Russian Federation do if the West remains within the framework of the economic war?


                    Enough to constantly "support" the professor, have your opinion. And it turns out like a maid for the owner.
                  2. +3
                    5 March 2018 09: 09
                    A lot of options. The United States has clearly, for a long time, wanted to set up an instability belt around Russia. And how will Israel and the United States react to such a belt?
                    How will Israel react to the appearance of a dagger in Iran? How will the United States react to the emergence of such systems in Venezuela, the Philippines, Cuba? As usual (for the first time.)
                    I’m thinking, at a dagger speed of 10000 km per hour, your government in Israel is better off pushing it before it hits or not?
                    Or the question is whether Turkey, Germany, France will go to war for NATO in the current conditions? Knowing what. Within an hour this government itself will cease to exist.
                    Welcome to the hypersonic era Jewish citizens.
                    1. +2
                      5 March 2018 13: 19
                      Quote: demos1111
                      How will Israel react to the appearance of a dagger in Iran?

                      That would be damn bad news. For Iran.
                      Quote: demos1111
                      How will the United States react to the emergence of such systems in Venezuela, the Philippines, Cuba?

                      No way. Both the younger Castro and Duterte (especially) say a lot of superfluous, but both of them (again, Duterte especially) are good at counting.

                      But Maduro, who does not know how to count, will immediately exit.
              2. +9
                4 March 2018 13: 35
                Professor, it's just a cartoon, we all the time, take care of the heart and nerves. America is better and smarter, nothing threatens you. )))
              3. +2
                4 March 2018 15: 50
                How angry Trump we have already read. But how angry was Putin and why? However, the effect exceeded all expectations! laughing
              4. +5
                4 March 2018 22: 18
                As I understand it, old Trump sent his greetings not only to Derepaska, but also to the guys producing aluminum and steel from the EU. Here is such an old Trump, you will not get bored with him. And do not worry about Florida. Now the Russian elite may be aware that there will be no alternate aerodrome. However, like any other. And the pictures were shown for information and awareness just to the Pentagon and the State Department. I understand I did not like it. But not all the same they show pictures that others do not like. We must get used to other people's horror cartoons. I am personally for complete nuclear disarmament and the elimination of all weapons carriers, but I understand one rule - do not want to be beaten, do not allow this. You do this and it seems successful. So we realized that.
                1. +2
                  4 March 2018 22: 52
                  Quote: Theseus
                  Now the Russian elite may be aware that there will be no alternate aerodrome.

                  Not for that, they or their parents broke the USSR. Not at all for that.

                  So if the "elite" really understands that the Cypriot, Maltese, English, Swiss, Israeli, American passports will not wave it off, then it will be fun and scary.
                  1. +2
                    8 March 2018 16: 10


                    Necessarily will.
              5. +1
                8 March 2018 03: 35
                You know the humoresque about rabbits: "Rabbits are not only valuable fur, but also four to five kilograms of easily digestible ..."
                Florida is also not only a reserve airfield of the Russian, but not the European elite, but also the US Air Force Base at Cape Canaveral. "Do you catch the thought?
                Regarding cruise missiles with nuclear poison, a phrase from the bowels of the Internet: "In 2003, the US Air Force military research laboratory funded the development of a nuclear engine for the Global Hawk unmanned reconnaissance aircraft to increase the flight duration to several months."
                And how do you sleep after such news, since 2003, has never been described with boiling water?
            2. +14
              4 March 2018 11: 17
              While animation specialists rummage in pixels, American missiles actually stand on our border and hang out in the Black Sea under the guise of missile defense, naturally directed against North Korea.
            3. +6
              4 March 2018 12: 24
              Quote: sabakina
              Journalist Matthew Lee did not see what you are talking about.

              Who is Matthew Lee and why is someone interested in his opinion?
          3. +14
            4 March 2018 09: 52
            Professor, and you are a liar! You took a picture from the video about the PC-20 "Satan." So that modern animators have nothing to do with it.
            1. +11
              4 March 2018 09: 56
              Quote: sabakina
              Professor, and you are a liar! You took a picture from the video about the PC-20 "Satan." So that modern animators have nothing to do with it.

              I am a liar? Hm. This cartoon showed Putin or me? Where did he get Putin ask him himself. If you have the courage. lol
              1. +9
                4 March 2018 10: 00
                Professor, I ask, the question is, will it answer? It so happened that I caught a glimpse of the message, but I did not see your picture. I’ll reconsider, but I don’t take my words back yet.
                P.S. Looked, yes, there is a picture. I take my words back. You are the truth in the penultimate instance. Nevertheless, I ask again, to whom should our warheads fall? Papuans? The Papuans do not have missile defense and nuclear weapons and they can only threaten us with spears and arrows!
                1. +12
                  4 March 2018 10: 28
                  Quote: sabakina
                  Professor, I ask, the question is, will it answer? It so happened that I caught a glimpse of the message, but I did not see your picture. I’ll reconsider, but I don’t take my words back yet.
                  P.S. Looked, yes, there is a picture. I take my words back. You are the truth in the penultimate instance.

                  1. Apologies are accepted.
                  2. What does it mean he will not answer you? Does he work for you or are you with him?

                  Quote: sabakina
                  Nevertheless, I ask again, to whom should our warheads fall? Papuans? The Papuans do not have missile defense and nuclear weapons and they can only threaten us with spears and arrows!

                  And I repeat, no one. You are a peaceful country and you are not threatening anyone. Even the stupid Kremlin has already made a bow for his mouth, saying that they don’t actually show any maps of Florida. lol
                  https://www.gazeta.ru/army/news/11236099.shtml
                  “I did not see, frankly, the map of Florida, so I see no reason to say that some states of the United States of America were really used there. No maps were used there, it’s absolutely arbitrary outlines, there’s no link to one particular country, ”Peskov said.
                  1. +1
                    4 March 2018 13: 42
                    Well, Peskov said correctly, he was not, he did not participate, he was not ...)) I am proud of the education that the USSR gave you, the comments are competent and justified. Wanted to find out real goals through cartoons? Tricky))) Well, yes, we are the country of idiots by the tsar at the head ...)))
          4. 0
            4 March 2018 11: 49
            Quote: professor
            I see what is shown there, and not what it seems to me.

            It is shown that to the farthest point from the launch site, the rocket can fly in different routes. How to show it in another way, suggest your option - I would like to look at it.
            Quote: professor
            No one could give a greater gift to the bourgeois military-industrial complex.

            And to suggest that such a statement could slightly correct the brains of those who, in their doctrine, prescribed the use of tactical nuclear weapons for a possible threat, hoping that the missile defense would protect it - not an option?
      2. +19
        4 March 2018 09: 41
        Quote: professor
        Especially the cartoon with the bombing of Florida. The Americans unsuccessfully forced their NATO partners to bring military spending to the promised 2% of GDP. Now the figure of 3% does not look fantastic.

        eight)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
        Yes, for the sake of Florida’s safety, Europeans will cover all expenses 8))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) )))))
        1. +5
          4 March 2018 12: 27
          Quote: Spade
          Yes, for the sake of Florida’s safety, Europeans will cover all costs.

          An attack on one is an attack on everyone.
          Article 5
          The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all
          1. +5
            4 March 2018 12: 31
            Quote: Cherry Nine
            An attack on one is an attack on everyone.

            It is intended 8))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

            Meanwhile, even the closest allies, the British, despite a bunch of promises, have not reached the required 2% of GDP. Instead, they are striking down their army under the banner of “reform.”
            1. +5
              4 March 2018 13: 03
              Quote: Spade
              despite a bunch of promises, they did not reach the required 2% of GDP. Instead, they are striking down their army under the banner of “reform.”

              You're right. Until recently, Europeans refused to recognize how great Vladimir Putin is. Perhaps at least now it will. Although there is little hope. The same Merkel is hard to hit the ground and turn around Margaret Thatcher.

              However, the EU, and to a lesser extent Britain, does not have to spend additional funds specifically on weapons. The creation, for example, of a European energy and gas transportation system, a program for the modernization of oil refining, etc., will solve the problem with today's Russia simply, reliably, and without too much fuss.
              1. +3
                4 March 2018 18: 03
                Quote: Cherry Nine
                You're right. Until recently, Europeans refused to recognize how great Vladimir Putin is.

                Rather, Europeans are less and less willing to carry out US geopolitical wishes at their own expense. Especially after the enchanting kidnapping with sanctions, when the main financial burden fell not on their initiator, but on the "allies"
                1. +4
                  4 March 2018 18: 20
                  Quote: Spade
                  Especially after the enchanting kidnapping with sanctions, when the main financial burden fell not on their initiator, but on the "allies"

                  People who consider German money better than the Germans themselves have always been amazed.
                  Quote: Spade
                  Rather, Europeans are less and less willing to carry out US geopolitical wishes at their own expense.

                  Given another cheap kipish with gas transit through Ukraine just the other day, the creation of a European energy and gas transportation system focused on Rotterdam and LNG, and it becomes reasonable - necessary. Either Europe will allow itself to blackmail, or not.
                  And in the military field, such assistants as Ursula von der Leyen, like Zhukov, having grinded the German army into dust, the USA is not particularly needed.

                  I will never understand how very sensible Merkel managed to appoint the German Mizulina to the ministers of defense.
      3. +7
        4 March 2018 09: 49
        Professor.
        "... Not a boring time is approaching. Those who believe that it is bad now will very soon begin to miss the present. Seize the moment, colleagues, and enjoy the present."

        You know better. Armageddon you have ...
        1. +3
          4 March 2018 10: 09
          And you personally, of course, bypassing something)))
        2. +9
          4 March 2018 10: 46
          Quote: cedar
          Professor.
          "... Not a boring time is approaching. Those who believe that it is bad now will very soon begin to miss the present. Seize the moment, colleagues, and enjoy the present."

          You know better. Armageddon you have ...

          They are brave, will find adventures on their ..., sorry, head. The situation is similar when one in the crowd launched a whisperer and after that is most indignant. smile
      4. +8
        4 March 2018 10: 20
        Quote: professor
        Quote: ul_vitalii
        Our partners can only take our word for it, I hope their baggage of knowledge will be enough to comprehend everything they saw and said.

        No one could give a greater gift to the bourgeois military-industrial complex. Especially the cartoon with the bombing of Florida. The Americans unsuccessfully forced their NATO partners to bring military spending to the promised 2% of GDP. Now the figure in 3% does not look fantastic.
        Supporters of real sanctions against Russia also received a trump card. Now they will shake pictures at every corner like on bourgeois equipment (CNC machines, machining centers, etc.) Russia is creating weapons.

        No boring time is coming. Those who believe that it’s bad right now will soon begin to miss the present. Seize the moment, colleagues, and enjoy the present. hi

        It doesn’t reach you that we won’t live according to yours, our independence is more expensive, it’s not for me to explain this to you. You, personally, have made your choice well for yourself. We have no illusions about the "Western simplicity of the soul", we did not expect and do not expect anything else from you. I have the honor. hi
      5. +14
        4 March 2018 11: 24
        Quote: professor
        Quote: ul_vitalii
        Our partners can only take our word for it, I hope their baggage of knowledge will be enough to comprehend everything they saw and said.

        No one could give a greater gift to the bourgeois military-industrial complex. Especially the cartoon with the bombing of Florida. The Americans unsuccessfully forced their NATO partners to bring military spending to the promised 2% of GDP. Now the figure in 3% does not look fantastic.
        Supporters of real sanctions against Russia also received a trump card. Now they will shake pictures at every corner like on bourgeois equipment (CNC machines, machining centers, etc.) Russia is creating weapons.

        No boring time is coming. Those who believe that it’s bad right now will soon begin to miss the present. Seize the moment, colleagues, and enjoy the present. hi

        The funny thing is that the bourgeois grandmothers will go for the deployment of REAL missiles, fighters, radar and other DLROs in the new areas of missile defense and air defense, and they will be opposed by virtual, not analogous to the world (about all kinds of dodgy Boeing shuttle gliders modestly silent) thousands of terribly scary dirty vigorous rockets. (By the way, did the scale of pollution during the test launch of this shaitan-arba compare with the Chernobyl ones?) Here you are: very scary, 100% bad (well, it’s also using dirty missiles) and an absolutely safe enemy.
      6. +6
        4 March 2018 11: 27
        Quote: professor
        No boring time is coming. Those who believe that it’s bad right now will soon begin to miss the present. Seize the moment, colleagues, and enjoy the present.

        One correction: it will be worse anyway. The war of 08.08.08 was being prepared before the Munich speech in 2007. The pumping of weapons by NATO countries and some of the countries neighboring Russia is still taking place, and Russia's response is rather weak simply because of the physical impossibility of somehow making parity on conventional weapons.

        With an aggressive policy aimed at a direct clash with Russia, everything is wonderful, and Trump and the CIA are unanimous in this, any supporters of sanctions are not needed in this case. But a demonstration of weapons can somehow help opponents of the escalation course.
        1. +6
          4 March 2018 11: 33
          Quote: Dagen
          But a demonstration of weapons can somehow help opponents of the escalation course.




          A demonstration of cartoons?
          1. +10
            4 March 2018 12: 00
            Quote: Town Hall
            A demonstration of cartoons?

            Raises the morale of infantile eccentrics fellow
            1. 0
              7 March 2018 11: 41
              Quote: Anti-Corr.
              Raises the morale of infantile eccentrics

              And also causes a fire asshole in the "intellectual" Ilita. And what’s your fighting spirit going up? American cartoons about omnipotent democracy or maybe gay parades?bully
          2. +1
            4 March 2018 12: 43
            Quote: Town Hall
            A demonstration of cartoons?

            Do you have alien technology to make a flying saucer fly behind a cruise missile and shoot a beautiful movie?

            Animations all over the world are used just to illustrate voice-over words when demonstrating promising technologies and weapons, static pictures with infographics would be just as successful.
            1. +3
              4 March 2018 12: 48
              Quote: Dagen
              Animations around the world are used simply to illustrate voiceover.



              That's it ... animation and words
              1. +1
                4 March 2018 13: 09
                Quote: Town Hall
                That's it ... animation and words

                You will be surprised, but such films are made in pavilions, no one goes to the past to make a film about dinosaurs and does not fly to the moon to make a film about a lunar expedition.
                1. +3
                  4 March 2018 13: 15
                  No, I won’t be surprised. The fact that the Commander-in-Chief did not represent an dinosaur movie was a bit confusing .... but I probably fell behind time and the testing of weapons has long passed under the jurisdiction of Walt Disney
                  1. 0
                    4 March 2018 13: 29
                    Quote: Town Hall
                    No, I won’t be surprised. The fact that the Commander-in-Chief did not represent the film about dinosaurs was a bit confusing ...

                    Don’t be embarrassed, it should be so, doesn’t it bother you that the film about the lunar expeditions was shot in Hollywood? Without any evidence!
                    Quote: Town Hall
                    but I probably lagged behind time and weapon testing has long come under the jurisdiction of Walt Disney

                    Your brain ulcer makes a lot of sense
                  2. +5
                    4 March 2018 13: 49
                    That would have immediately laid out the drawings, yes, Town Hall? )) Yes, never mind, "Armata" is also made of cardboard, Ukrainian intelligence has already learned everything)) Peace be with you, sleep peacefully.)
        2. +1
          4 March 2018 16: 22
          An arms demonstration can only help escalators.
      7. +3
        4 March 2018 11: 31
        Of course, I understand everything, but supposedly before that they didn’t know that they were under the gun?))) before that they were all looking for targets on Mars?))))
      8. 0
        4 March 2018 11: 44
        Quote: professor
        No one could give a greater gift to the bourgeois military-industrial complex. Especially the cartoon with the bombing of Florida. The Americans unsuccessfully forced their NATO partners to bring military spending to the promised 2% of GDP. Now the figure in 3% does not look fantastic.
        Supporters of real sanctions against Russia also received a trump card. Now they will shake pictures at every corner like on bourgeois equipment (CNC machines, machining centers, etc.) Russia is creating weapons.

        I correctly understood that you think that in vain our country is developing new models - types of weapons? Those. - we do not need to do this?
        1. +10
          4 March 2018 12: 09
          Quote: vitvit123

          I correctly understood that you think that in vain our country is developing new models - types of weapons? Those. - we do not need to do this?

          Of course you need. Like any country with its own defense industry. They just need to be put into operation without threats.
          1. +6
            4 March 2018 13: 04
            Enemies saw a threat, allies warning for enemies.
            You swallowed your tongue from cartoons, and what will happen when the gigimon’s body cools down?
            Where will you hide from the bearded, in Russia?
            Yes, and in Europe are not really stupid, what 2%, now why then?
            I won’t be surprised if European leaders now complain to Putin about state occupation ..
          2. 0
            4 March 2018 13: 50
            But they didn’t threaten us ???
          3. +3
            4 March 2018 19: 21
            Quote: Aron Zaavi
            Of course you need. Like any country with its own defense industry. They just need to be put into operation without threats.

            Well, you know, a nuclear war in the 20 century was only avoided when Nikita crashed into the stands with his shoe.
            And who is threatening anyone? Is it that we stationed our troops in Mexico? Are we in Cuba 400 PU for cruise missiles and radar built? Is this what we overlaid the US with military bases?
            I remember when we (the USSR) moved our missiles to Cuba - there was an American screech on the whole planet ... and there were no threats - there was a military operation from the United States. So we acted gently and diplomatically with this warning demonstration. They must clearly understand that it will not work with impunity, this is the best defense against attack.
        2. +7
          4 March 2018 12: 50
          Quote: vitvit123
          Quote: professor
          No one could give a greater gift to the bourgeois military-industrial complex. Especially the cartoon with the bombing of Florida. The Americans unsuccessfully forced their NATO partners to bring military spending to the promised 2% of GDP. Now the figure in 3% does not look fantastic.
          Supporters of real sanctions against Russia also received a trump card. Now they will shake pictures at every corner like on bourgeois equipment (CNC machines, machining centers, etc.) Russia is creating weapons.

          I correctly understood that you think that in vain our country is developing new models - types of weapons? Those. - we do not need to do this?

          1. Who am I to indicate what is right for you and what is wrong? It is up to your leaders to decide, and you to pay.
          2. The development of weapons for the defense of one’s country is a crucial step, and the rattling of weapons is an irresponsible step. In this case, the effect will be the opposite of what was intended. The Cold War has reached a new level.
          1. 0
            4 March 2018 18: 01
            Quote: professor
            Quote: vitvit123
            Quote: professor
            No one could give a greater gift to the bourgeois military-industrial complex. Especially the cartoon with the bombing of Florida. The Americans unsuccessfully forced their NATO partners to bring military spending to the promised 2% of GDP. Now the figure in 3% does not look fantastic.
            Supporters of real sanctions against Russia also received a trump card. Now they will shake pictures at every corner like on bourgeois equipment (CNC machines, machining centers, etc.) Russia is creating weapons.

            I correctly understood that you think that in vain our country is developing new models - types of weapons? Those. - we do not need to do this?

            1. Who am I to indicate what is right for you and what is wrong? It is up to your leaders to decide, and you to pay.
            2. The development of weapons for the defense of one’s country is a crucial step, and the rattling of weapons is an irresponsible step. In this case, the effect will be the opposite of what was intended. The Cold War has reached a new level.

            We blurted out only in response to Messrs. Trump with the senators! tongue
          2. +2
            4 March 2018 18: 31
            Before waving your tongue like this, look at the speeches of your Jewish politicians and the media, which quite often allow themselves hawkish messages. Pot calls the kettle black....
      9. +5
        4 March 2018 12: 11
        Quote: professor
        No one could give a greater gift to the bourgeois military-industrial complex. Especially the cartoon with the bombing of Florida. The Americans unsuccessfully forced their NATO partners to bring military spending to the promised 2% of GDP. Now the figure in 3% does not look fantastic. Supporters of real sanctions against Russia also received a trump card.

        There is no need to shake it with your Israeli underworld - sanctions against the Russian Federation have already been introduced and, apparently, forever (i.e., before the collapse of NATO). Another thing is that Europeans have now put a bolt on American Wishlist and are buying liquefied gas not in America or Qatar, but in Russia. And if they buy, then they sell something in the opposite direction - and this is clearly not agricultural products.

        We are interested in increasing the share of military spending in the budgets of NATO countries - all the same, all Western developments will be poured into the toilet by the next developments of Russian designers (much cheaper), and a blow to the welfare of Europeans in the form of reduced contributions to social programs will be dealt.

        PS Professor, your daughter and grandchildren live in St. Petersburg, Florida, USA? bully
      10. +10
        4 March 2018 12: 22
        Quote: professor
        Those who think that it’s bad now will very soon begin to miss the present

        Russia has never lived as well as under President Obama.
        And there will be no more.
      11. 0
        4 March 2018 13: 52
        Speak correctly, Professor, let them print more paper, give more paper !!
      12. 0
        4 March 2018 14: 56
        What, professor, is it scary? And don’t talk. But how dare these Russians have a world hegemon, the USA !!! rockets to send! Another thing is when the world hegemon surrounds Russia not with computer cartoons, but with real rockets. They mean you can, yes, professor? But Russia is not allowed, is it a professor? And then the war may begin. Russia should sit under the bench and not rock the world hegemon. So professor?
      13. 0
        4 March 2018 17: 29
        Professor, and where is your usual - all the Soviet / Russian past century, nonsense, with skepticism that has no analogues, etc. ....
      14. 0
        4 March 2018 19: 12
        Quote: professor
        No one could give a greater gift to the bourgeois military-industrial complex. Especially the cartoon with the bombing of Florida. The Americans unsuccessfully forced their NATO partners to bring military spending to the promised 2% of GDP. Now the figure in 3% does not look fantastic.
        Supporters of real sanctions against Russia also received a trump card. Now they will shake pictures at every corner like on bourgeois equipment (CNC machines, machining centers, etc.) Russia is creating weapons.
        No boring time is coming. Those who believe that it’s bad right now will soon begin to miss the present. Seize the moment, colleagues, and enjoy the present.

        Yes, we are not in the first - we can handle it.
        In any case, we should not bend to the west - just imagine, prof, that we or Iran would have surrounded your country with military bases, deployed battalions of our troops at your borders, deployed Iskanders under your nose for the sake of protecting Tel Aviv’s environment and introduced a partial trade blockade ... would you give up?
        I don’t know about you, but we will not give up! Even if the wife of Santa Claus introduces sanctions against us, we, the professor, can handle this as well.
      15. +4
        4 March 2018 21: 56
        About how it exploded, one of the first to comment. Professor, you said that Russia should defend its interests, how are you in BV? Now you are literally storming in the opposite direction. Didn’t bring a new training manual? Well, the State Department is hard now.
      16. 0
        4 March 2018 22: 24
        “Hypersonic weapons, like any other weapon, are a strategic factor only when they are adopted by the Armed Forces in droves. The president back in 2016 announced the start of the conversion of the military-industrial complex of Russia. Declaring such things (referring to a new weapon - approx. SNS), our president must declare the conversion rejected. If he does not refuse, it will be an extremely dangerous and bad move for Russia's security. We will push our rivals to create hypersonic weapons systems, they will massively put them into service, and we will not be able to do this. As a result, we will be in a serious loss. ” Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Missile and Artillery Sciences, Captain First Rank Konstantin Sivkov.
        It seems Kurchatov, giving an interview, once said that when you know that nuclear weapons have already been invented by man, re-creating them is already a matter of time. The most difficult for the discoverer.
        It turns out that Putin greatly facilitated the creative torment of Western weapons scientists.
      17. KCA
        0
        5 March 2018 15: 31
        And how much bourgeois heavy equipment does Russia buy? A certain East Asian communist country is ready to completely solve the problems with CNC machine tools and processing centers in the Russian Federation, while asking for a small fraction, oil, gas and weapons, and puts not just a bolt, but a huge bolt with a 9999 head on other market participants
        1. +1
          5 March 2018 17: 31
          Quote: KCA
          And how much bourgeois heavy equipment does Russia buy?

          Everything seems to be.
          Quote: KCA
          A certain East Asian communist country is ready to completely solve the problems

          There, by the way, Igor Ivanovich’s best friend was just tied up. They say it was somehow stolen incorrectly. Apparently, picked up bad habits.
        2. ZVO
          0
          5 March 2018 18: 20
          Quote: KCA
          And how much bourgeois heavy equipment does Russia buy? A certain East Asian communist country is ready to completely solve the problems with CNC machine tools and processing centers in the Russian Federation, while asking for a small fraction, oil, gas and weapons, and puts not just a bolt, but a huge bolt with a 9999 head on other market participants


          And what brands do the Tyazhmash Chinese factories own?
          Do we have a lot of really high-precision machines from China?
          I did not hear ....
          Everything is branded, i.e. European and American and Japanese manufacturers with facilities in China - will not supply and will not supply products under pain of real multi-million-dollar fines.
          Have you ever heard about how high-precision machines are “blocked” ???
          For one reason or another?
          And it does not matter what is in the official information, whether care for the client, whether the guarantee - but everything is blocked.
          1. KCA
            0
            6 March 2018 05: 40
            The Jackson-Venik amendment has not yet been canceled, but this does not prevent the purchase of supercomputers and other things falling within the scope of this amendment, money is above all, both during the USSR and now, about high-precision machines and processing centers - Minatom somehow works , builds the most reliable reactors in the world, not with a file, but they bring the reactors to condition, an accident like Fukushima is completely excluded at Russian reactors, graphite moderators extend upwards from pin to owls, which requires an external power source, we have a simple o FALLING down in the event of an accident and power failure
            1. +1
              8 March 2018 05: 28
              On December 20, 2012, the Jackson Venik amendment was repealed in relation to Russia.
              On this day, US President Barack Obama signed into law, which received the official name of the English. Russia and Moldova Jackson-Vanik Repeal.
      18. +1
        6 March 2018 00: 57
        Quote: professor
        No boring time is coming.

        Here, in order to push him a little, the Supreme and announced the availability of new armament of our armed forces. Now the KNS of the Armed Forces of the States will again re-calculate the combat potentials of the parties and the options for their combat use ... I do not think that the calculations will delight BSU planners. If sclerosis doesn’t fail me, as our colleague used to say, then 50 million people for the States have always remained the threshold of unacceptable damage ... Unless, of course, the current Tramplin administration has raised it because of its cannibalistic appetites!
        So, the step has been taken right and most importantly timely: there are very few left before the turn of 2020 ... Now let them try to risk their health! am
        1. 0
          6 March 2018 01: 30
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          If sclerosis doesn’t fail me, as our colleague used to say, then 50 million people for the States always remained the threshold of unacceptable damage ..




          And for Russia, how many souls did your smart colleague determine this threshold?
      19. +1
        10 March 2018 09: 49
        Of course, it is Putin who is to blame for the fact that NATO is moving east, throughout the Middle East of the revolution, the warmed USA and aircraft carriers are circling around the DPRK and the fact that Trump the same Kazakhstan has recently made a little share of money in favor of the USA is also Putin's fault. Professor may be worth removing the blinkers from the eyes?
    3. mvg
      +10
      4 March 2018 12: 50
      In recent history, there was already one Austrian who was trying to threaten the world with wunderwaffles ... I honestly do not understand why the president pushed this speech? For cheers patriots? To saliva sprayed?
      1. +4
        4 March 2018 13: 55
        So, our president is not an Austrian ...) It’s good that they confessed to a misunderstanding of the moment, otherwise you might think that you are stupid ...))
        1. mvg
          +1
          4 March 2018 15: 08
          So explain, wretched, why all this circus? Yes, and to the masses. Everyone who needs it knows that. And now the media has thrown so much “tasty” and brilliant ... you’ll sway .. For a week, at least.
      2. +4
        4 March 2018 16: 17
        You think that the President is threatening the world. Explain what “peace” means in your understanding. I believe that the answer is obvious - this is a unipolar world with a world hegemon - a policeman - a judge in one bottle.
        Yes, perhaps he threatens such a world.
        1. mvg
          +2
          5 March 2018 00: 08
          I think that in order to threaten, you must have something in the sleeve, preferably not a cookie. Otherwise, it's poker.
          Now our president has pushed a new round of the Cold War, and it bothered me that the state with tremendous frequency drives its own people into the railroad. It was on 91, 98, 2008, 2014 and it is only global. I know what I'm saying, because right after the next crisis I was losing something. Work, business, money ... The fact that we are now in the ... well, tomorrow we will remember how heaven is unearthly.
          ps: and give me his election campaign poke ... I can just nod if necessary. Front of the TV.
          1. 0
            5 March 2018 21: 03
            And how much I and people like me lost after every crisis ... That's just for businessmen and I still work, without you in the Union, you could at least get in line for an apartment ...)) You whine forever, all of you a bad president ... Yes, at least it’s not a shame, as for Yeltsin ... But of course it’s expensive to eat, you can’t say anything, but do you businessmen cry for expensive grub? ..)) In short, everything is normal with foreign policy. )) And Dima has a lot of pritenzy, yes! )))
            1. mvg
              0
              5 March 2018 21: 49
              I am now a simple engineer. You know that out of 10000 entrepreneurs survive, and they plow 12/7/365, and the majority of the population is not capable of this. Please come to work, drink coffee, flirt with the employees ... sit in VK, dig deeper into the nose. And do not think about anything.
              But to get into an apartment ... in the Union ... Yes, there were times, only I had to earn an apartment myself, I still pay, after another "taking" money.
              PS: I also feel sorry for the Union, as a child, I was proud that I was born in the USSR, now it’s not very like that.
        2. mvg
          0
          5 March 2018 21: 44
          Let's do it again. There are more than 200 countries in the world. Of these, Russia has allies, 0 point 0. Belarus (she needs us), Syria (she needs us and we need it) and Serbia (brothers), concurrently Iran (but it by itself). The rest are somehow unfriendly to us, from the word Absolutely to the word Do not care.
          Correct me if not right.
          And on the other hand, a bunch of countries that consider themselves free (most likely by right), this is the world.
          1. +1
            6 March 2018 01: 13
            Quote: mvg
            Correct me if not right.

            Quote: mvg
            Belarus (she needs us)

            Old Man did not recognize the Crimea, I recall.
            Quote: mvg
            Syria (she needs us

            Not Syria. Assad. Once Assad is removed, any next government will kick in the ass.
            Quote: mvg
            and Serbia

            EU candidate, "junior partner" in NATO
            https://ria.ru/analytics/20161110/1481095785.html


            Russia has no allies. There are customers. LPR / DPR, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Transnistria. To your trouble, Armenia.
            All.
            1. 0
              6 March 2018 01: 24
              Quote: Cherry Nine
              Quote: mvg
              Syria (she needs us
              Not Syria. Assad.



              not so simple in the Danish kingdom) ..



              MOSCOW, 2 MAR - RIA News.

              Syria is an ally of Russia, but there is no agreement on allied relations with it, said presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov.


              Earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin said in a message to the Federal Assembly that Moscow would "consider any use of nuclear weapons against Russia or its allies as a nuclear attack on our country, the answer will be instant and with all the ensuing consequences."

              "As far as I know, Russia and Syria do not have a comprehensive document on allied relations. As far as I know, there is no such document," said Peskov, answering the question whether the Russian Federation would protect Syria if nuclear weapons are used.

              "She is an ally, of course, Syria is our ally, but, as you understand, from the point of view of international obligations, allied relations are formed using a contractual basis," he added.
              1. +2
                6 March 2018 01: 35
                Quote: Town Hall
                not so simple in the Danish kingdom) ..

                Quote: Town Hall
                it is our ally, but, as you know, in terms of international obligations

                Assad is a client, not an ally. So more precisely.

                And partners tend to interpret him simply as the leader of one of the local terrorist groups. It may become unprofitable to deal with such matters.

                And the question to Peskov is completely insane. It is quite obvious that all parties to the conflict that have nuclear weapons, who, and Assad, will endure without special warheads.
                1. 0
                  6 March 2018 01: 46
                  I think that the excuse about Assad is an ally to us, but only in terms of concepts, but legally do not owe anything, it’s still universal and will be used not only in case of unrealistic use of nuclear weapons. Tomahawk hit also falls into such a vague formulation)
      3. +1
        8 March 2018 05: 40
        And how did you survive this news fifteen years ago: "In 2003, the US Air Force military research laboratory funded the development of a nuclear engine for the Global Hawk unmanned aircraft with the goal of increasing the flight duration to several months."
        All saliva did not go out? For fifteen years, the equalizer. About the Austrian did not forget his words?
        Threat. I just didn’t understand the Air Force in this news - this is in the sense of the Air Force of the United States of America or in the sense of the BBC - the British nationwide public broadcasting organization.
        But if in the sense of the British Broadcasting Organization, then this should not be the United States.
    4. +12
      4 March 2018 14: 34
      Quote: ul_vitalii
      Our partners can only take our word for it, I hope their baggage of knowledge will be enough to comprehend everything they saw and said.


      I think your king is bluffing and puffing out his cheeks before the election. no there is no rocket with a vigorous engine.
      in principle, this is understandable - well, how else to mobilize the electorate and hurray patriots? 100500 times promise to double / triple all the good and destroy all the bad? after 18 years of rule, it’s somehow not convincing. but to show a big grandmother in a cartoon - it’s possible. and it’s not worth the hassle and there is no need to prove it for secrecy.
      1. +5
        4 March 2018 20: 33
        Quote: vlad_vlad
        Quote: ul_vitalii
        Our partners can only take our word for it, I hope their baggage of knowledge will be enough to comprehend everything they saw and said.


        I think your king is bluffing and puffing out his cheeks before the election. no there is no rocket with a vigorous engine.
        in principle, this is understandable - well, how else to mobilize the electorate and hurray patriots? 100500 times promise to double / triple all the good and destroy all the bad? after 18 years of rule, it’s somehow not convincing. but to show a big grandmother in a cartoon - it’s possible. and it’s not worth the hassle and there is no need to prove it for secrecy.

        According to their sovereigns, do not judge by cheating, the first time he said, and you were taken aback. Nobody imposes anything on you, nothing depends on you anymore. hi
    5. +1
      4 March 2018 16: 53
      This resource published articles about Myasishchev's aircraft, as well as about the American project of an unmanned cruise missile with a nuclear power plant. The idea of ​​the strait to them. Stalin is even more ancient, expressed by Sakharov, who was awarded a name square in the United States. All these ideas belonged to the 1950s. But the presentation, admittedly, was very unexpected.
    6. +2
      4 March 2018 17: 05
      "The rocket sharply gained speed and altitude, hiding in the clouds. Then they showed the rocket in the air. The product flew at a given height, leaving behind a faint trail of smoke."

      What is smoke during reactor operation? With both strontium air. From one cold to another hot ...
    7. 0
      5 March 2018 15: 27
      And why did you get the idea that this rocket exists -Maybe it flies on birch chocks? -One rocket and two stokers and a car of birch chocks to it-Do you believe that nonsense?
  2. +7
    4 March 2018 06: 29
    Through the efforts of our patriots: scientists, engineers and workers of the military-industrial complex, there was a very good reason and the opportunity to put everyone who imagined themselves to be the bosses on this planet at the negotiating table and politely, but very convincingly, to offer, having seized all their “molds”, to dump them from our “sandbox” " Yes, quickly ...
    1. +7
      4 March 2018 07: 06
      cedar
      imagining themselves the bosses on this planet
      Do not forget that Trump is only the top manager of the privately owned financial oligarchy of the US Federal Reserve Bankers.
    2. +17
      4 March 2018 09: 05
      It won’t work out. I mean this way. There will be only one more round of armaments. You can only sit down at the negotiating table by giving them teeth in different parts of the world by conventional means or by raising the country's economy to the proper level. Example-70s of the last century. Cold war in full swing, but everyone reckoned with the country, respected and feared. And now it’s just a dummy, and not the economy, entirely dependent on external factors.
      Quote: cedar
      Through the efforts of our patriots: scientists, engineers and workers of the military-industrial complex, there was a very good reason and the opportunity to put everyone who imagined themselves to be the bosses on this planet at the negotiating table and politely, but very convincingly, to offer, having seized all their “molds”, to dump them from our “sandbox” " Yes, quickly ...
    3. +12
      4 March 2018 09: 50
      Take your time. There is nothing else.
      At the moment, it is only known that a promising cruise missile with a nuclear power plant has passed some tests. According to the results of these checks, as Putin stated, the development of a full-fledged strategic missile complex may begin .... When the experimental design work is completed and the latest models with unique capabilities come into service, it is unknown
      As appears from the paragraph of the article, there was an attempt to carry out yet another, regular research, to make experimental models and conduct them some tests. Will the OCD and when and how will it end is really clear only to those who feel on their own skin the whole conglomerate of conflicting technological and systemic problems associated with the global management of this wonderful weapon. So far, I believe that the nuclear power plant is an unsupported beautiful horror story.
      1. +4
        4 March 2018 12: 16
        Quote: 210ox
        The Cold War was in full swing, but everyone reckoned with the country, respected and feared it. And now it's just a dummy, and not an economy that is entirely dependent on external factors.

        Again Yaroslavna’s cry from apartment 210. Everything was gone ...
        1. +1
          4 March 2018 18: 32
          No, not everything was lost. It is just necessary to change the socio-political system and work. And do not clap your hands and ears at the first statements of the rulers.
          Quote: Winnie76
          Quote: 210ox
          The Cold War was in full swing, but everyone reckoned with the country, respected and feared it. And now it's just a dummy, and not an economy that is entirely dependent on external factors.

          Again Yaroslavna’s cry from apartment 210. Everything was gone ...
        2. +1
          5 March 2018 15: 30
          That's right, nothing but empty threats, such a weapon is first demonstrated and then confronted with the fact. And our cheap computer graphics were drawn in half an hour and trying to surprise everyone with the intercontinental strategic flying nuclear strap-ons that did not sit down for years. At the top of the mind was to make a similar speech ... Okella missed ....
      2. +5
        4 March 2018 12: 33
        Quote: SHURUM-BURUM
        As appears from the paragraph of the article, there was an attempt to carry out yet another, regular research, to make experimental models and conduct some tests on them

        Actually, plums immediately went that the national leader was just lying.
        A source close to the military-industrial complex told Vedomosti that radiation safety was provided during rocket tests. The nuclear installation on board was an electric prototype, the source said.

        That is, there was no nuclear power plant on the rocket.

        Another thing, who we believe more, is a national leader or "a source close to the military-industrial complex." This is a matter of political views.
        1. +5
          4 March 2018 13: 44
          Quote: Cherry Nine
          Another thing, who we believe more, is a national leader or "a source close to the military-industrial complex." This is a matter of political views.

          In this case, it is easier to believe the "source", because the direct-flow, and indeed any other atmospheric engine, drives through itself tons of air per minute (for example, a Boeing engine consumes about 250 kg per second). In the case of NRE this air will pass through the hot zone of the reactor. And there will be a priest in the form of a heart. For radioactive substances will get into the atmosphere no less than during the Chernobyl accident.
          1. +9
            4 March 2018 13: 51
            Quote: tchoni
            In this case, it’s easier to believe the “source”

            To the President of Russia-and so in a stupid way lied?

            No.
            It can not be.
            I do not believe.
            ...
            (Crying)
            1. The comment was deleted.
          2. KCA
            0
            5 March 2018 15: 39
            Americans have made a direct-flow tank, after more than 60 years, I don’t think that Russian scientists and designers limited themselves to the passage of the working fluid through the reactor’s active zone, it’s impossible to make protection from neutrons easy and mobile, but direct contact with the active zone could be eliminated, and the effect of neutrons with atmospheric air will lead to the appearance of short-lived isotopes of oxygen and nitrogen, long-lived isotopes of carbon, but it is small in the atmosphere
      3. +1
        4 March 2018 16: 28
        Somewhere I saw that the tests were with an electric simulator of a nuclear installation (the formulation is suspicious, what kind of battery should it be, but it wasn’t me who invented it). But even without that, I think it's a bluff.
        1. +2
          4 March 2018 16: 47
          Quote: alex86
          I saw somewhere

          In Vedomosti. Quote above.
          1. +1
            4 March 2018 17: 03
            Then you need to rejoice at what awesome batteries we have (well, if you did not steal it from Tesla).
            By the way, in the year 74, I had a friend in a box of household matches (remember, there were eight of the usual sizes) assembled a battery connected in series / in parallel (I don’t remember - from Kron, perhaps from simple ones - flat) so the car lamp burned hurt and for a long time - without any Mask.
            1. KCA
              0
              6 March 2018 05: 32
              Tesla has a battery made of conventional finger-type lithium-ion batteries developed by Panasonic 18650, made in China, the 18650 model was quite successful, it is made by all battery manufacturers
          2. +4
            4 March 2018 22: 00
            Oh, the sleeping ones got activated? As they bomb you, they climbed out in a flock. Preparing for the election? And further along Lavrov.
  3. +15
    4 March 2018 06: 30
    Unlimited range sounds menacing
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +2
        4 March 2018 11: 25
        vovapoputkin

        Crowds of hamsters will send masks to Mars, and we will be engaged in real affairs.
        1. +1
          4 March 2018 12: 08
          Quote: figvam
          Crowds of hamsters on Mars will send masks

          What do Martians think about this? belay
          1. +1
            4 March 2018 16: 25
            Quote: Anti-Corr.
            Quote: figvam
            Crowds of hamsters on Mars will send masks

            What do Martians think about this? belay

            Like what?
            1. 0
              4 March 2018 16: 37
              Quote: Freeman
              Like what?

              Ndaaaaaaaa, the years go by, but nothing changes on the "red planet" what
              1. +1
                4 March 2018 16: 48
                Quote: Anti-Corr.
                Ndaaaaaaaa, the years go by, but nothing changes on the "red planet"


                And they said in the USSR stagnation ....
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +1
                    4 March 2018 20: 12
                    already 58. Not relevant. laughing
                    1. +1
                      4 March 2018 20: 29
                      Quote: Choi
                      already 58. Not relevant.

                      Exactly! but we grow laughing And most importantly, how to "correctly" tells.
    2. +1
      4 March 2018 12: 00
      Quote: Cheburator
      Unlimited range sounds menacing

      Firstly, we already had such missiles in service that went into orbit and fell to the target not from the first turn, but at the right moment.
      Secondly, mobile nuclear reactors (like missiles with a nuclear reactor) were tested here half a hundred years ago. Progress does not stand still (a task would be set and money allocated for its implementation)
  4. +9
    4 March 2018 06: 34
    Cyril’s articles are usually very interesting, but not in this case - nothing new, a retelling of the known. It would be interesting to know the principle of operation of nuclear power plants - how does the energy of a nuclear reaction transform into the kinetic energy of a jet?
    1. +6
      4 March 2018 08: 13
      Quote: vlad007
      It would be interesting to know the principle of operation of nuclear power plants - how does the energy of a nuclear reaction transform into the kinetic energy of a jet?

      The rocket engine is a sealed monoblock core nuclear fuel assembly, filled with a metal internal coolant built into the rocket’s tank body with a solid metallized “fuel” working fluid, direct-flow air intakes, MGDG and a controlled nozzle device. For acceleration, an internal working fluid is used, heated by a nuclear reactor to the temperature of the plasma, which is ejected through the MHD generator and nozzles, after acceleration to high speeds, an incident air flow is additionally used.
      1. +2
        4 March 2018 08: 56
        it is not very clear whether the temperature from the metal coolant is sufficient to warm the working fluid to the state of "plasma" (sodium, it seems to boil at 800 degrees). And how are the rods removed from the core, if something went wrong?
        1. +3
          4 March 2018 09: 14
          We can only speculate.
          Quote: prodi
          Is the temperature from the metal coolant sufficient to warm the working fluid to the state of the "plasma" (sodium, it seems to boil at 800 degrees)

          I believe there is not a circulating coolant, the temperature on the shell is equal to the temperature in the core.
          Quote: prodi
          how are the rods removed from the core, if something went wrong?

          I think they are not introduced and not displayed, one-time, they started the detonator once, until they burn out.
          1. 0
            4 March 2018 09: 21
            I, in the sense, only to fly: although, of course, you can increase the pumping of the working fluid and the change in the geometry of the nozzle
        2. +2
          4 March 2018 09: 56
          It is more likely that everything is simpler - a nuclear power plant — a fuel generator that powers an electric jet engine — a subsonic missile. Everything else is expensive - heavy construction. Therefore, their use in a rocket is not acceptable. With them, at a cost, a cruise missile will be like an ICBM.
        3. +2
          4 March 2018 10: 04
          (sodium, it boils at 800 degrees)

          And who said that there is sodium?
      2. +2
        4 March 2018 08: 59
        And if the coolant is not metallic, but in a liquid state, or is there generally a pair of high-density heavy metal?
        1. +3
          4 March 2018 09: 06
          well, it also seems to me that the working fluid is simply pumped through the core without any intermediaries
        2. +3
          4 March 2018 09: 24
          the launch field this rocket does not imply a return
          there is neither bioprotection, nor the 2 circuit with any carriers, the reactor core is built into the ram engine
          1. +5
            4 March 2018 10: 00
            Quote: prodi
            the working fluid is simply pumped through the core without any intermediaries

            Quote: Romario_Argo
            there is neither bioprotection, nor the 2 circuit with any carriers, the reactor core is built into the ram engine

            Well, yes, such a rocket will fly through half the world with such an exhaust and there’s nothing more to start.
            1. +3
              4 March 2018 10: 06
              And who told you that?
            2. 0
              4 March 2018 11: 48
              Quote: SPACE
              Quote: prodi
              the working fluid is simply pumped through the core without any intermediaries

              Well, yes, such a rocket will fly through half the world with such an exhaust and there’s nothing more to start.

              indeed and it doesn’t matter - this rocket is strictly in addition to ballistic nuclear
            3. 0
              4 March 2018 16: 30
              SPACE

              with which exhaust? what are you talking about?
              The missile carries nuclear warheads + uranium 90% enrichment is in the fuel elements (he does not spill to the ground) The flight takes place in dense layers of the atmosphere at altitudes of 40-80 km. so that people on earth are not in danger, there is only a small ionizing radiation.
              1. +1
                5 March 2018 06: 35
                Quote: Romario_Argo
                The missile carries a nuclear warhead + uranium 90% enrichment is in the fuel elements (it does not spill onto the ground)

                You will not be able to blow out the Thela evenly, deformation will begin ...
            4. 0
              4 March 2018 16: 45
              "... such a rocket will fly through half the world with such an exhaust and there’s nothing more to start."
              Why fly so far? Let yourself fly over the positional area of ​​the American missile defense until you get knocked down. And if they knock it down - it will be a radioactive present for them, they will not knock it down, it itself will fall with the same effect. Well, the filling is not combat but with some kind of electronic suppression.
      3. +4
        4 March 2018 09: 01
        So simple smile School graduate understands laughing And then, damn it, whole institutes, universities of top-secret - closed branches of different countries have been fighting for half a century, and nifiga. You need to file a Nobel application.
        1. +2
          4 March 2018 10: 02
          Quote: Fedorov
          And then, damn it, whole institutes, universities of top-secret - closed branches of different countries have been fighting for half a century, and nifiga. You need to file a Nobel application.

          The main problem in materials and construction, sometimes from theory to work design is very far.
        2. 0
          5 March 2018 14: 34
          I will not die of modesty. But I think that the tactics of using this product should be discussed more than the technical side, and bring to the senses of the country, enabling Americans to deploy their missiles. And there should be a lot of examples of use.
      4. +1
        4 March 2018 09: 08
        You do not confuse anything about the MHD generator?
        Quote: SPACE
        Quote: vlad007
        It would be interesting to know the principle of operation of nuclear power plants - how does the energy of a nuclear reaction transform into the kinetic energy of a jet?

        The rocket engine is a sealed monoblock core nuclear fuel assembly, filled with a metal internal coolant built into the rocket’s tank body with a solid metallized “fuel” working fluid, direct-flow air intakes, MGDG and a controlled nozzle device. For acceleration, an internal working fluid is used, heated by a nuclear reactor to the temperature of the plasma, which is ejected through the MHD generator and nozzles, after acceleration to high speeds, an incident air flow is additionally used.
        1. +3
          4 March 2018 09: 26
          In my opinion, the MHD generator has nothing to do with it.
          1. +1
            4 March 2018 10: 07
            Quote: 210ox
            You do not confuse anything about the MHD generator?

            Quote: Aviator_
            In my opinion, the MHD generator has nothing to do with it.

            A rocket needs a lot of electricity, including to create a magnetic field at nozzles and fairings.
            1. 0
              4 March 2018 10: 51
              Yes, of course, but it’s supposed to be problematic to poke there an undeveloped MHD installation, which was abandoned at the beginning of the 70's. Although, given the one-time inclusion - there is such a possibility.
      5. 0
        4 March 2018 11: 21
        In fact, it is just like cavitational collapse of water bubbles with the release of plasma effects, i.e., at a sonoluminescent level of flow out, which then spontaneously turns into water again and is pushed as a flow with kinetic energy.
        1. AUL
          +4
          4 March 2018 11: 56
          Well, thank God, Gridasov came and explained everything clearly and clearly.
          1. +1
            4 March 2018 12: 14
            For some reason, everyone thinks that the priority in achieving success belongs only to those developers who give a lot of money. Not at all. Due to the lack of funding, our alternative laboratory is forced to work more honestly in the analysis of all new developments. But we are free in terms and in general reasoning. Therefore, we have changed the fundamental foundations of such processes. I will give an example that is not even taken into account by these funded developers, but which are fundamentally important. I have already written that radioactive radiation or the polarization of radioactive material is vectorially radial. Therefore, our methodology for creating directional polarization of radioactive material makes it possible to radically concentrate this potential energy, which means directing it to that vector that creates a whole range of new and very important advantages of our technology. Therefore, we were able to combine everything in one device and into a single algorithmic process where the concentration of energy density occurs in the reactor, and at the next moment this energy is already transformed into the kinetic mass rejection flow. At the same time, I note that modern turbines, and generally propellers and propellers, have three stages of flow pressure drop. Therefore, those who know about this should understand the key problems of modern turbines. But we created a turbine, completely new in quality of work, and without failures in a drop in the flow pressure.
      6. +1
        4 March 2018 12: 26
        Quote: SPACE
        For acceleration, an internal working fluid is used, heated by a nuclear reactor to a plasma temperature, which is ejected through the MHD generator and nozzles, after acceleration to high speeds, an incident air flow is additionally used

        And the fig?

        It is enough to cool the nuclear fuel (ceramic mass of plutonium oxide) with lead, pump the lead through a heat exchanger located inside the ramjet, transfer heat to the air and voila - nuclear ramjet in action.

        And for pumping lead, use a linear electric motor that will be supplied with current from a thermionic converter - it is also a ramjet heat exchanger.

        All ingenious is simply outrageous laughing
      7. 0
        4 March 2018 16: 10
        Hamsters fell in ecstasy ...... laughing
  5. +4
    4 March 2018 07: 26
    Quote: vlad007
    Cyril’s articles are usually very interesting, but not in this case - nothing new, a retelling of the known. It would be interesting to know the principle of operation of nuclear power plants - how does the energy of a nuclear reaction transform into the kinetic energy of a jet?


    Yes, there was such a nuisance, gentleman, they went crazy, didn’t overlook, didn’t have time to notify Yours! All those responsible and appointed by the Ministry of Defense, the Kurchatov Institute, the administration of Sami, production workers, allied personnel, etc., etc., etc., come with a report to you, with a full report and a report on the coordination of all parameters of the technical specifications and X with Vasyess ! Wait!
  6. +13
    4 March 2018 07: 32
    I am not a physicist, but higher technical education can be said in uniform in air defense.
    Well, at least kill! I can’t catch up HOW IT WORKS recourse

    I rumbled and no, dofig theories, but to no avail, well, that’s understandable ... The core part is bungled - no question, even in space the reactors plowed ... But there watts of energy were needed. And how to convert physical cravings properly, and even for a long time, then my brain begins to melt.
    there is a plaque, well, you warmed up the case - the air, the oncoming flow, doesn’t need to be cooled, there is no turbine or is it, maybe some kind of "plasmoid" pushes it? wink request
    So Vivat, fellow engineers drinks
    1. +5
      4 March 2018 08: 07
      Direct-flow air jet engine, judging by the use of the starting accelerator.
      1. 0
        4 March 2018 09: 02
        And if he doesn’t throw away anything at all and the atmosphere, and after acceleration uses the energy of the fields, through a nuclear reactor converted into a jet of momentum?
        1. +7
          4 March 2018 09: 28
          You need to ask Gridasov this, he knows everything
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. 0
          4 March 2018 14: 52
          Quote: Herkulesich
          And if he doesn’t throw away anything at all and the atmosphere, and after acceleration uses the energy of the fields, through a nuclear reactor converted into a jet of momentum?

          Which fields? Electrical? Magnetic? Or colored ???
    2. 0
      4 March 2018 11: 27
      And you won’t dig anything. The fact is that this will not work anyway. Why? Because the same principle is used as in standard reactors. That is, water or air containing water is separately converted into steam, and then the steam rotates the turbine as a propulsion device. Therefore, it is necessary to combine the reactor as an engine with a propulsion in one mechanism. Since this is not the case, the positive effects of one are leveled off by the non-negative of the other.
    3. 0
      4 March 2018 12: 25
      Quote: Fedorov
      Well, did you heat the case - the air flowing in doesn’t need to be cooled, there is no turbine or is it, maybe some kind of “plasmoid” is pushing it?

      The incoming air is cold, it is denser, the heated air expands greatly, and in order to leave the reactor it is forced to move towards the nozzle at a high speed, additionally accelerating in the laval nozzle and creating jet thrust - is it so primitively clear? laughing
      1. ZVO
        +1
        4 March 2018 12: 56
        Quote: Locksmith
        Quote: Fedorov
        Well, did you heat the case - the air flowing in doesn’t need to be cooled, there is no turbine or is it, maybe some kind of “plasmoid” is pushing it?

        The incoming air is cold, it is denser, the heated air expands greatly, and in order to leave the reactor it is forced to move towards the nozzle at a high speed, additionally accelerating in the laval nozzle and creating jet thrust - is it so primitively clear? laughing

        Well ?
        What order should a nuclear reactor give heat to air to provide a draft of 3 kilonewtons (300 kgf)?
        1. 0
          5 March 2018 07: 10
          Plutonium sawdust a few microns in size in the stream to throw ... For example.
    4. +2
      4 March 2018 12: 37
      Quote: Fedorov
      Well, at least kill! I can’t catch up HOW IT WORKS

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pluto
  7. +4
    4 March 2018 07: 39
    One can only guess how exactly foreign countries will react to the appearance in Russia of such weapons with unique characteristics and capabilities.


    Everything is clear here - at first they will slam champagne, and then they will jump to the congress (or parliament) for grandmas.
    1. +1
      4 March 2018 08: 00
      They’ll jump to psychiatrists too. wink
    2. +4
      4 March 2018 09: 02
      Quote: Deck
      Everything is clear here - at first they will slam champagne, and then they will jump to the congress (or parliament) for grandmas.

      And then to the archives. The achievements of the 60 years, both they and we already have.

      There was already an article on nuclear aircraft at VO.
      1. +1
        4 March 2018 11: 29
        This is not a working structure. Therefore, it dates back to the sixties
        1. +1
          4 March 2018 12: 28
          Quote: gridasov
          This is not a working structure. Therefore, it dates back to the sixties

          Well, you understand the circuit diagram with elements of secrets no one will show, but the device is just working and working laughing
          1. 0
            4 March 2018 12: 46
            It is also necessary to understand such a nuance that any breakthrough technology or development should have completely new and long-term prospects for research potential. In this case, there is nothing that could have the depth of such new scientific research.
      2. 0
        4 March 2018 12: 32
        This is not a jet engine, it is a hydrogen rocket engine (air and hydrogen are working fluids).

        An air-jet additionally has an air intake that compresses the air before heating.
        1. 0
          4 March 2018 13: 15
          It is very interesting that when we talk about air, we always forget such an important component of it as the presence of water in its changing state of aggregation. Namely, water is the key mechanism of ionization of the surface of the outflow. It is a mechanism, not a substance.
          1. +1
            4 March 2018 20: 53
            When will you calculate and model the Warp engine?
            1. +2
              4 March 2018 21: 07
              Basic principles and calculations are already there. Worse is another that you have to use the method and technology in the initial period in the production of household heat energy generators (you need to live with something), and therefore the information will fly apart very quickly and the Russians are far behind in terms of promptness. So the right holders will be Americans or Chinese. Of course, ideally, it would be normal if the military first adopted this technology. Then you will be ahead in the development of all the others always at a certain period of time. it will be impossible to hide, but constantly ahead of the curve is quite real.
  8. +3
    4 March 2018 07: 50
    This may be a dump of misinformation. The enemy must be beaten with his own weapon, through the media.
    1. +7
      4 March 2018 08: 41
      Desa from Putin? At that level? Even Khrushchev and Brezhnev did not allow this. Have you carefully listened, watched the speech of the GDP? He repeatedly sharpened-repeated what happened. A person with such experience cannot blur this repeatedly. Moreover, over the past 2-3 years, this infa has "climbed out" to the surface more than once, and also in the mattress.
      ANSWER WILL BE INSTANT .. at least and old speech.
      1. +4
        4 March 2018 10: 16
        Remember Reagan, with his star wars. Yes, and Eisenhower with his "Powers lost." From ours and recent ones: the green men in Crimea are not ours and "we are not going to carry out an operation in Syria."
        1. 0
          5 March 2018 07: 22
          Indeed, Reagan also proclaimed star wars, which in the end did not happen. Our military then consulted and said: the Americans cannot create such a thing now, but that does not mean that they will not be able in the future. And, apparently, Reagan, with his bluff, made the USSR move forward. We must be more calm about such statements.
      2. 0
        4 March 2018 21: 14
        Although Putin is bluffing, he did everything right! Now everyone is fighting for "time." Everyone has invested so much in innovative developments that they think that there will be returns, but they won’t be there until there is a breakthrough step of both a fundamental comprehensive discovery and a fundamental invention. But no one knows where this will happen.
      3. +1
        8 March 2018 05: 59
        In fact, Khrushchev also admitted some information that was not entirely true. For example, about the volume of rocket production in the USSR.
    2. +3
      4 March 2018 09: 38
      If this is disa, then the polar fox is already in the garden ...
      1. +5
        4 March 2018 12: 40
        Quote: dzvero
        If this is disa, then the polar fox is already in the garden ...

        This writes the entire liberal and novorossky part of my tape.
  9. +3
    4 March 2018 08: 24
    Then on the next branch, the info passed yesterday from RT - already in the series. I doubt it very much. And where are specialists taught, technical engineers? This is not just a launch container with terminals for connection. This engineering miracle somehow needs to be stored, transported, serviced. There is also a vigorous "Hiroshima" loaf inside plus an engine in a state of readiness. Unless, of course, somewhere, for example, in the Novosibirsk “institute” of good deeds, cold synthesis was not boiled down. request
    1. +3
      4 March 2018 12: 43
      Quote: Fedorov
      info passed yesterday from RT

      Infa from RT?
      1. +1
        4 March 2018 15: 12
        YES ! You can just go to the "news" for yesterday at VO. hi or to RT itself.
        1. +3
          4 March 2018 15: 46
          Quote: Fedorov
          YES !

          You do not seem to understand the question.

          This is the same RT, who first lied about the crucified boy, and then - lied that he didn’t say anything like that?
          https://theins.ru/antifake/58435
    2. 0
      5 March 2018 07: 07
      I recall the Soviet film "Wizards" ...
  10. 0
    4 March 2018 08: 29
    “In addition, equipping a rocket with an unlimited flight range with a non-strategic charge looks like a real waste and not very meaningful consumption of very valuable products." ... if you make the nuclear compartment with a parachute system detachable ... in case of an emergency situation, you could pick it up and dispose of. Put communications equipment in the place of a nuclear warhead ... let them barrage over little or no populated areas of the country, creating communications coverage not only for the military ... so that anyone can call for help from a mobile phone. Put tracking equipment ... track the same forest fires ... any option pays off when used properly. Well, or the electronic warfare equipment will block all areas of the North and the Far East from a surprise attack with cruise missiles.
    1. AUL
      +1
      4 March 2018 12: 14
      I think you got excited here. The fact is that the exhaust from such a rocket will be highly radioactive. Therefore, in peacetime, it is not necessary to drive such a rocket over its territory. In a situation of war - there will be no time for such "trifles".
  11. +3
    4 March 2018 08: 35
    [quoteAt the end of last year, a successful launch of a rocket from a nuclear power plant took place at the Central training ground of the Russian Federation] [/ quote]
    And right there:
    [quoteIt is obvious that after the detonation of the warhead and the destruction of the rocket will follow the release of nuclear fuel with known consequences.] [/ quote]
    I would very much like to know where the missile launched at the Central training ground of the Russian Federation fell at the end of last year. Or will there be a surprise again?
    1. +10
      4 March 2018 09: 30
      It flies so far in circles, the time of autonomy is determined.
  12. +14
    4 March 2018 08: 48
    After reading the article, an old joke was recalled.
    ================================
    An 90-year old man comes to the doctor and complains:
    - My nursing home neighbor saysthat he can do it three times a night with girls, but it’s not always possible for me once a week. What to do?
    What the doctor answers him:
    -Neighbour says? Well, you speak.
    ================================
    What politicians do not tell before the election. What is there to discuss? request
    1. +1
      4 March 2018 09: 06
      Oleg hi Take part in the elections lol came to speculate about everything at once and nothing specifically? If you don’t know something, or don’t know how, then it doesn’t follow from this that nobody in the world knows and doesn’t know how!
    2. +4
      4 March 2018 09: 31
      Professor, calm down, the message was not for you, but for a puddle.
      1. +2
        4 March 2018 09: 48
        And where will all this professors go without meager?
      2. +2
        4 March 2018 15: 11
        The professor has such a concept, if the Jews did not, then no one did.
    3. ZVO
      +3
      4 March 2018 12: 59
      Quote: professor
      After reading the article, an old joke was recalled.
      ...
      What politicians do not tell before the election. What is there to discuss? request


      Oleg! Can your post be regarded as Mossad’s interference in the election of the Russian president of 2018 ???
      1. +1
        4 March 2018 18: 50
        Quote: ZVO
        Quote: professor
        After reading the article, an old joke was recalled.
        ...
        What politicians do not tell before the election. What is there to discuss? request


        Oleg! Can your post be regarded as Mossad’s interference in the election of the Russian president of 2018 ???

        It is impossible. Since there are no choices. There is an extension of authority. wink
        1. ZVO
          0
          4 March 2018 20: 42
          Quote: professor

          It is impossible. Since there are no choices. There is an extension of authority. wink


          plin ... broke ... wink
  13. +2
    4 March 2018 08: 51
    The lost civilization of the Earth, preceding the present, also used aircraft with nuclear weapons, mercury served as a working fluid. As a result of the thoughtless use of weapons of mass destruction, civilization disappeared, the carriers of Knowledge all died, the common people became wild and only after millennia came to a modern state. So not everything is clear!
    1. 0
      4 March 2018 13: 20
      Quote: andrewkor
      So not everything is clear!

      Crimean officer daughter
      1. +1
        4 March 2018 14: 47
        Oh, how everything is running! Do not be lazy, find on the Internet "Attack of the Gods", just for fun. Information on the topic "Ancient Aircraft" is the sea. You can argue, but why hang labels on the go without thinking. And even a colonel.
  14. +5
    4 March 2018 09: 07
    "Other countries" abandoned the development and testing of nuclear engines for aviation and missiles, primarily because of their extreme "dirt" - that is, due to air pollution by radioactive isotopes. Obviously, Russia does not care, at the end of last year all Western media in Europe were concerned about the sudden, sharp, pollution of the atmosphere by radioactive isotopes. The investigation showed that the pollution comes from the territory of Russia - some pharmaceutical companies that produce drugs based on radioactive isotopes were suspected. All these enterprises rejected all claims to them. It is curious that Rosatom also commented on those events as having nothing to do with its department. Now it’s clear that this was a test of a nuclear engine for a rocket. If one test gave such a huge radioactive trail, which reached right up to Europe, then what about the flight of such a rocket? This is just a disaster for the whole ecology! Now the question is, it is clear that the “product” will need to be improved and other tests will be needed, that is, there will be even greater pollution of the atmosphere, and above all over Russia, that is, the health of the Russians will suffer from this. And God forbid such an engine will crash, explode or something ....
    1. +3
      4 March 2018 11: 31
      This is a weapon of last chance .. And when it is applied about ecology it will be too late to discuss .. But who brought our country to such developments would you think about ..
    2. 0
      4 March 2018 12: 37
      Quote: Snail N9
      health will suffer first of all from Russians

      Tests are conducted over the ocean, combat use will be carried out over NATO countries and limitrophs - so worry about your health.
      1. +1
        4 March 2018 17: 12
        Tests are conducted over the ocean,

        But what, is that possible? It seems that there is an agreement to ban any nuclear tests in international waters and in the air? Not?
        1. 0
          4 March 2018 17: 25
          Ban on testing nuclear charges; testing nuclear reactors is not prohibited.
    3. 0
      5 March 2018 01: 49
      Quote: Snail N9
      "Other countries" abandoned the development and testing of nuclear engines for aviation and missiles primarily because of their extreme "dirt"

      The problem of habitat pollution will be finally solved only as a result of the world nuclear war. And nuclear weapons to destroy competitors can be detonated even on their territory - let them suffer.
  15. +2
    4 March 2018 09: 10
    I doubt that the video shows exactly that rocket.
    But the question is, how is the reactor disposed of in peacetime - in the process of testing, accidents, etc.?
    And about the fake - is it true or not? And this is the point! Putin laid out our “friends” alignment - now let them think. Most likely they are already aware of some tests - and there something happened, something not. Something in reality has been done, something is not quite as it was said. Some words were said for sure in order to distract attention from something else, some were absolutely true, nothing was said about something at all. In general, a good rebus, a new task for American analysts, is enough for them to deal with Syria and Ukraine.
    1. +13
      4 March 2018 10: 11
      Putin laid out to our "friends" alignment

      Do not make me laugh. The layout is laid out to the electorate. "Friends" are guided by sources that are more reliable than fairy tales from Channel One. Fortunately, it’s not so difficult to track the work of a nuclear power plant in the atmosphere: it should be fond of the heart.
  16. +3
    4 March 2018 09: 41
    Quote: Tatiana
    cedar
    imagining themselves the bosses on this planet
    Do not forget that Trump is only a top manager private financial oligarchy of bankers-loan sharks of the US Federal Reserve.


    I will try not to forget ...
    But you, do not forget that the President of the United States is the head of state and ... US Executive
    Our president under "our" Constitution is not the head of the executive branch. But it is precisely this power that the vast majority of our people attribute to him, demanding from him, and not from the head of the executive branch in the Russian Federation, Prime Minister Medvedev, power to use.
    At the same time, the people stubbornly do not endow President Putin with such power, changing the Constitution accordingly, through the procedure for holding an All-Russian Constitutional Referendum.
    1. +6
      4 March 2018 10: 08
      At the same time, the people stubbornly do not endow President Putin with such power, changing the Constitution accordingly, through the procedure for holding an All-Russian Constitutional Referendum.

      Immediately to the emperors, which is already there. Or in the Great Leaders will produce. We will redraw the state in the image and likeness of North Korea, fortunately, there are progress in this direction :)
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +3
      4 March 2018 12: 47
      Quote: cedar
      and not from the head of the executive branch in the Russian Federation, Prime Minister Medvedev

      You have jokes.

      80.3. The President of the Russian Federation, in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal laws, determines the main directions of the state’s domestic and foreign policy.
      ...
      84. a) appoint, with the consent of the State Duma, the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation;

      b) has the right to chair meetings of the Government of the Russian Federation;

      c) decide on the resignation of the Government of the Russian Federation;
      ...
      e) at the suggestion of the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation, appoints and dismisses the deputies of the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation, federal ministers;
    4. +1
      8 March 2018 06: 23
      Wikipedia excerpt:
      By the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated May 12, 2008 No. 724, the federal executive bodies were determined, the activities of which are directly supervised by the President of the Russian Federation, as well as the federal services and federal agencies subordinate to these federal executive bodies:
      Ministry of Internal Affairs, Ministry of Emergencies, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Defense, Ministry of Justice, SVR, FSB, FSO, Rosrezerv, Rosguard.
      This is not a complete list, but only an extract of some organs.
      Threat. May 12, 2008, the president was not Putin.
  17. +1
    4 March 2018 10: 00
    Quote: 210ox
    Will not work.I mean this way. There will be only one more round of armaments. You can only be seated at the negotiating table by giving teeth in different parts of the Earth by conventional means or by raising the country's economy to the proper level. Example-70s of the last century. The Cold War is in full swing, but everyone reckoned with the country, respected and feared. And now it’s just a dummy, and not an economy that is entirely dependent on external factors.
    Quote: cedar
    Through the efforts of our patriots: scientists, engineers and workers of the military-industrial complex, there was a very good reason and the opportunity to put everyone who imagined themselves to be the bosses on this planet at the negotiating table and politely, but very convincingly, to offer, having seized all their “molds”, to dump them from our “sandbox” " Yes, quickly ...


    We will see what happens and what does not. The test is simple. If they are swept out, then it turned out. So all the gadgets for our "partners" are and work as they should.
    If everything is old and worse then it didn’t work out .., but that's another story, and maybe the end of the story ...
  18. The comment was deleted.
    1. +3
      4 March 2018 10: 19
      History was taught at 1 !!! The Austrian corporal brought Germany into the leaders of Europe in terms of economic growth, and then he crushed this same Europe for himself. ! So, before explaining, in-depth read the subject of discussion, or learn a better story!
      1. +3
        4 March 2018 10: 29
        The Austrian corporal was a good sponsor. Which, however, ultimately did not bring him happiness in life.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      4 March 2018 11: 39
      where are you from cute /))) I see familiar trolling))) pumping out the bowels in a barbaric way)))) and what else can you tell?
  19. +7
    4 March 2018 10: 06
    Most reminiscent of the Reagan statements on SDI, in order to get arguments in negotiations on pressing issues. Well, the elections, again - lovers of glue tanks delighted)
  20. The comment was deleted.
    1. +4
      4 March 2018 11: 27
      Well, Troll, come to Donbass or to my homeland - Eastern Siberia, you can visit your brother in Yamal. I will show you how the Russians live. And the "cartoon" will include at will I wash down any. I won’t even regret that I would look at such a r-ode. But you are a coward, my son. .- You can only speak from around the corner. Contact in a personal phone. I will give.
      Maybe I'm wrong and you are a Patriot of the Motherland?
    2. 0
      4 March 2018 11: 40
      Do you have any kind of action before the election? to spoil on all resources?))))))
    3. +6
      4 March 2018 12: 53
      Quote: vovapoputkin
      and is this mode capable of technological breakthrough?

      More convincing

      However, at the moment they have increased as much as 400 bucks. One problem. One must be a disabled engineer.
      https://trudvsem.ru/company/1087415002168
      1. +8
        4 March 2018 13: 08
        Now, looking at the fact that the milling machine gets more than a “design engineer” or “electronic engineer” I am absolutely calm. All this miracle of technology will remain on low-quality advertising cartoons.
        1. +4
          4 March 2018 13: 15
          Quote: professor
          the milling machine gets more than a design engineer

          Disabled design engineer, please note.

          Here it is, social responsibility.
        2. +3
          4 March 2018 13: 28
          If suddenly someone did not understand the problem.
          https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Employer=Loc
          kheed_Martin_Aeronautics_Company / Salary

          And, to complete the picture,
          http://bs-life.ru/rabota/zarplata/depetaty-gosdum
          y.html
        3. +1
          4 March 2018 13: 52
          Quote: professor
          looking at the fact that the milling machine gets more than a "design engineer" or "electronic engineer" I am absolutely calm. All this miracle of technology will remain on low-quality advertising cartoons.

          I don’t understand why you need to worry? All these new weapons systems that the president spoke of will not fly to Israel smile
          If anything, they’ll send you a couple of ordinary “Yars” or a triple of “Topol”. Cost optimization so to speak laughing
          1. +3
            4 March 2018 18: 59
            Quote: Stilett_71
            I don’t understand why you need to worry? All these new weapons systems that the president spoke of will not fly to Israel

            I invested money in American companies. I would not want to be left without a pension in old age.

            Quote: Stilett_71
            If anything, they’ll send you a couple of ordinary “Yars” or a triple of “Topol”. Cost optimization so to speak

            There is a change in our box office for change. laughing

            Quote: Fedorov
            I don’t want to offend anyone, as you know, I’m deeply insulting Israel with its hodgepodge of traitors. I docked with the hardened Jews, and more than once under the Union of the USSR.
            But sooner or later, In Yerusalim and "Istanbul" - Constantinople there will be an Orthodox Cross, possibly in a different form.
            Although you chew on mattress benefits with your ass, alas, you do not have fresh water.
            And nobody flies this problem. That recycle toilet waste., And - enjoy Israeli clean water.
            Sincerely, Professor, Am I wrong?

            You see, sir, rude, we do not have much fresh water and we protect it. We do not waste in vain. We still have enough water for everything, including agriculture and such that we sell fruits and vegetables to you and sell fresh water to our neighbors. Here Ukrainian tourists felt the lack of water in Israel. their legs were barely alive. Thanks to the Israeli rescuers.
        4. +1
          4 March 2018 15: 30
          I don’t want to offend anyone, as you know, I’m deeply insulting Israel with its hodgepodge of traitors. I docked with the hardened Jews, and more than once under the Union of the USSR.
          But sooner or later, In Yerusalim and "Istanbul" - Constantinople there will be an Orthodox Cross, possibly in a different form.
          Although you chew on mattress benefits with your ass, alas, you do not have fresh water.
          And nobody flies this problem. That recycle toilet waste., And - enjoy Israeli clean water.
          Sincerely, Professor, Am I wrong?
          1. +5
            4 March 2018 15: 40
            Quote: Fedorov
            but alas, you don’t have fresh water.

            You will be surprised, but fresh water is a commodity. It is made from sea water, money and brains.

            In Israel, all this is enough.
          2. ZVO
            +1
            4 March 2018 20: 52
            Quote: Fedorov

            But sooner or later, In Yerusalim and "Istanbul" - Constantinople there will be an Orthodox Cross, possibly in a different form.


            You are so stupid. what you don’t see. how Arab mosques are already in almost every quarter of Russian cities ...




            we have already been captured ... and you are talking about the Holy Cross in Istanbul and Jerusalem ...
            what Blind you are ... And most importantly - you are just stupid ... You do not know how to see what is just around you ...

            Did you say something about life in Siberia?
            What is the proportion of southern non-Russian peoples in the population:
            New Urengoy?
            Surgut?
            Nefteyugansk?
            Nizhnevartovsk?
            Salekhard?
            Nadym?
        5. +1
          5 March 2018 14: 28
          Quote: professor
          Now, looking at the fact that the milling machine gets more than a “design engineer” or “electronic engineer” I am absolutely calm. All this miracle of technology will remain on low-quality advertising cartoons.


          And taking into account the fact that in China, a similarly experienced engineer receives from 9000 yuan per month (9500yuan / 6,31 = 1505 US dollars) or our engineer 22300p / 56,66 = 393 US dollars

          It means that the sensible US dollar will not go to 393 and the level of training and experience will be low and the motivation is very low.
          1. 0
            5 March 2018 14: 32
            Quote: DimerVladimer
            And taking into account the fact that in China, a similarly experienced engineer receives from 9000 yuan per month (9500yuan / 6,31 = 1505 US dollars) or our engineer 22300p / 56,66 = 393 US dollars
            It means that the sensible US dollar will not go to 393 and the level of training and experience will be low and the motivation is very low.

            9000 RMB is a novice engineer, and those who already have experience get twice as much. At our factory in China, workers without a specialty have a salary of about $ 1000.
  21. 0
    4 March 2018 10: 27
    This year we expect Russia's 1st place in the GlobalFirepower rating fellow
    1. 0
      4 March 2018 12: 27
      They do not include SNF
  22. +2
    4 March 2018 11: 21
    I wonder how this bird phonite in the thermal and radioactive spectra.
  23. +1
    4 March 2018 11: 38
    Tell me how the energy of nuclear fission is converted into a reactive moment?
    1. +1
      4 March 2018 18: 23
      And I will explain. In 1965, Robert Heinlein, a great science fiction writer, composed the novel "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress."
      There, interplanetary ships were running ... water!
      Lunites with earthlings almost started a war. (For independence :)
      I suppose that nuclear reactors evaporate water and a jet stream of steam moves a spaceship (in our case, a wunderwafel) with incredible speed into the adversary's den. And when the water on board ends, a special fence for rain opens and the pepelats can circle in search of a target until plutonium burns out. That is, before our life ...
  24. 0
    4 March 2018 13: 09
    Quote: Aron Zaavi
    Of course you need. Like any country with its own defense industry. They just need to be put into operation without threats.

    I asked for an opinion, not a lecture (how and and where to introduce them). And if so, what is your opinion about the threat and to whom?
  25. +3
    4 March 2018 13: 12
    It touches the moan ,,,, aaaa patchima Florida in roller, ento provoke a race vaaaruzheniyiy !!! ,,,,,. Indeed, the good peace-loving USA did not compare us with Ebola, they did not say anything about revisionism, and Hollywood did not remove a hundred films about bad races .
    1. +5
      4 March 2018 13: 20
      Quote: Serge Gorely
      It touches the moan ,,,, aaaa patchima Florida in roller, ento provoke a race vaaaruzheniyiy !!! ,,,,,. Indeed, the good peace-loving USA did not compare us with Ebola, they did not say anything about revisionism, and Hollywood did not remove a hundred films about bad races .






      I did not know that Putin V.V. is the artistic director of Soyuzmultfilma .... I was always sure that it was temporarily replacing the duties of the President of the Russian Federation
      1. +1
        10 March 2018 14: 05
        Quote: Town Hall
        Quote: Serge Gorely
        It touches the moan ,,,, aaaa patchima Florida in roller, ento provoke a race vaaaruzheniyiy !!! ,,,,,. Indeed, the good peace-loving USA did not compare us with Ebola, they did not say anything about revisionism, and Hollywood did not remove a hundred films about bad races .






        I did not know that Putin V.V. is the artistic director of Soyuzmultfilma .... I was always sure that it was temporarily replacing the duties of the President of the Russian Federation

        Exactly! because Western presidents use gnawed mammoth bones, a ballpoint pen and a notebook for presentation !!! Putin is put to shame !!!!
  26. 0
    4 March 2018 13: 12
    Quote: professor
    1. Who am I to indicate what is right for you and what is wrong? It is up to your leaders to decide, and you to pay.
    2. The development of weapons for the defense of one’s country is a crucial step, and the rattling of weapons is an irresponsible step. In this case, the effect will be the opposite of what was intended. The Cold War has reached a new level.

    We always have the opposite effect from you - we will survive! Yes, and do not die twice .... Americans won’t rattle, but surrounded us with arms - maybe advise them something!
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. +3
    4 March 2018 14: 26
    It all looks like a circus, I must say. Testing such missiles is already quite a dumb business, not to mention possible accidents during testing.

    Again, it is very difficult to imagine a reactor with a useful life of tens of hours with any long-term cold storage.
  29. +2
    4 March 2018 16: 05
    Putin spoke of the invulnerability of missiles for missile defense and air defense. But if you think about it, such a missile is a completely ordinary aerodynamic target. Yes, radar detection is difficult at low altitude, and a small EPR can be added to this. But she will simply "scream" about herself in the infrared range, because an increase in the efficiency of a nuclear jet engine is achieved, first of all, due to an increase in the temperature of the exhaust. It’s quite a contrasting target against the sky, and against the background of the earth and can be hit by an air-to-air missile or missile launcher with a TGSN.
    1. +2
      4 March 2018 16: 44
      How are they going to test it? She gives a very dirty exhaust. This is a flying reactor, and even around the rocket the background will be very high. Yes, while it will be stored, it rebuilds everything and everyone around
      1. +1
        4 March 2018 17: 37
        Well, actually, NRE was tested both in our country (RD-0410) and in the States (NERVA), and the problem of pollution did not seriously stop anyone. And in general, when the motherland says “We must!”, They don’t think about radioactive contamination
        1. 0
          4 March 2018 19: 04
          As far as it was tested, I have no data. In my opinion, she did not get to the real test, because all because of the same problem with radioactivity. Why, there are the usual intercontinental ones, including submarines. They are quite enough
          1. 0
            4 March 2018 21: 24
            The engines for space rockets were tested and quite successfully, but the developments were covered up. By the way, no one planned to use them in the atmosphere, including due to the fact that corny did not develop sufficient traction for separation, but they had a high specific impulse.
      2. 0
        4 March 2018 20: 57
        It’s very simple - in this rocket the “nuclear engine” is a separate generator - a nuclear, and an electric jet engine.
        1. +2
          4 March 2018 21: 27
          How do you imagine that?
        2. +1
          4 March 2018 22: 15
          Bullshit :) Vadim, do you represent the propulsion characteristics of a megawatt class electric propulsion? :) I’ll tell you: this is .... about 0.1 kN- (i.e. 1 kg-s). For class X-101 KR requires an engine with
          traction .5-1 ts :)
          1. 0
            5 March 2018 01: 02
            Electric motors allow you to develop revolutions from 300 to 40000 and higher per minute at a power of 1 kW, the subsonic rocket accelerates its solid-fuel accelerator and the electric motor maintains speed - no IR radiation, fuel is needed, the chip of this development is a nuclear isotope generator - like only much more advanced - 10 kilowatts per minute.
            1. 0
              5 March 2018 22: 49
              RTG ... Not suitable - specific power is low.
            2. 0
              6 March 2018 12: 27
              And what, excuse me, is the mover of the rocket? What does the electric motor work for? To the propeller? Then this is not a rocket turns out, and the screw on supersonic is inefficient.
              1. 0
                7 March 2018 23: 27
                Subsonic missile - an electric motor with a gearbox of 100000 rpm, two turbine wheels.
    2. 0
      4 March 2018 20: 55
      Flies at an altitude of 100m around the terrain. You can also see it from the ground from about this distance. You can hit a rocket. But when the penetrating element penetrates under the skin, an explosion of a thermonuclear warhead will follow. You can see from space in good weather. But try to predict which trajectory will fly further ..
      1. +2
        4 March 2018 21: 38
        You can see not “from space”, but from the side of a barring interceptor or UAV by the thermal radiation of the engine for tens of kilometers and launch the missile from the missile-assisted vehicle or track it in real time, transmitting data to air defense systems. The speed during flight with envelope relief is clearly not prohibitive. A thermonuclear explosion over the territory, of course, is an unpleasant thing, but in order to destroy highly protected objects (the same ICBM mines), a warhead must be detonated in close proximity to them.
        1. 0
          6 March 2018 11: 42
          to destroy highly protected objects (the same mines of ICBMs)

          Due to the limited speed and relatively large flight time, it cannot be a means of a first strike. She does not need in silos - they will already be empty by then. For silos - Sarmat, Vanguard, Dagger. And her goals are more so, to put it mildly, extended and not very resistant to drops in excess pressure in the front of the shock wave ..
          1. 0
            6 March 2018 12: 33
            Even if the target is a surface areal (city), then a detonation above the center at a certain height is needed in order for the shock wave to cause maximum damage. Undermining at the lines of interception for tens of kilometers from the target will cause some damage, but not catastrophic.
      2. 0
        4 March 2018 22: 12
        100 meters? So, from 8-10 kilometers it is detected from "zero" - read the radio horizon, just the same, school trigonometry :)
        1. 0
          6 March 2018 11: 35
          radio horizon, just the same, school trigonometry
          the use of the terrain reduces the radio horizon. Smoothly only on paper, you forgot about the ravines.
  30. +1
    4 March 2018 16: 54
    And what for was it to give out military secrets? And Kirill Ryabov looked at the rocket from close range. Everything is clear with Armata and Vanguard - Satan 2. Now the Americans will call this cruise missile, we will know what it was. winked
  31. 0
    4 March 2018 17: 01
    Meanwhile, in Ukraine:
    According to the Department of Science and Education of KHOA, this is due to bad weather conditions and low temperature conditions in educational institutions (they need to be warmed up), as well as the fact that many students and schoolchildren have already managed to leave.
    Read the details on UNIAN: https://www.unian.net/politics/10030127-v-dnepre-
    i-harkove-ostavili-kanikuly-ne-poydem-na-povodu-v
    -idiotov.html
  32. +2
    4 March 2018 17: 02
    Thanks to the author for the article. Youth recalled. I recalled the editorials of the central newspapers during the days of the next Central Committee Plenary Session or the historical congress of the CPSU, at which Dear Ilyich made a report. This report was then published as a separate book; it was studied in universities and schools in primary party organizations.
    Are those glorious times coming back?
    1. 0
      4 March 2018 17: 30
      Leonid Ilyich did not contact the designers of weapons from the word at all.

      This was done by Joseph Vissarionovich and Nikita Sergeevich, now Vladimir Vladimirovich is doing it.

      Catch a feature of the moment? laughing
      1. +1
        4 March 2018 18: 49
        Do you mean the peculiarity of the moment that Khrushchev demonstrated about Stalin at the XX Congress? It could be the same. In theory, this should be someone from the immediate environment. Who do you think?
        1. 0
          4 March 2018 18: 54
          No, you don’t catch - it’s immediately obvious from the Outskirts laughing

          Where is the work with designers to increase the military potential of the country and where are the internal party disassemblies?
          1. +1
            4 March 2018 21: 09
            Well, we cannot comprehend your lofty thoughts with our village mind. But remember that at first there was work with designers, and then, a little later, XX congress. But since you insist on increasing the defense potential, you, in the center, of course, know better.
            1. 0
              4 March 2018 22: 35
              A little later, the twentieth congress was a satellite, Gagarin, "Kuzkina mother" and ballistic missiles like sausages.
          2. +2
            4 March 2018 22: 13
            What can a designer politician teach him? Either the designer is bad, or the politician is not busy with his own business.
            1. 0
              4 March 2018 22: 45
              You don’t understand anything. I won’t be surprised that they will still post on the network drawings of the rocket with the edits made by HIS (politics in the sense) HAND !!!
  33. 0
    4 March 2018 17: 38
    Something is not clear to me. In fact, there is nothing else, but the noise has been spread all over the planet ....
    Maybe this is a provocation (if we exclude simple human stupidity) ??? Maybe there is already something completely different, at least no less effective?
    Indeed, according to the logic of things, as yet nothing concrete is needed, it is necessary “for all progressive humanity” to quickly unite and strike at this “arrogant aggressor” - Russia, which threatens the whole World ....
  34. 0
    4 March 2018 18: 17
    Radioactive contamination, everything is gone.
    What kind of panic is that? May have solved the pollution problem. The atomic battery was previously the same only among science fiction writers, but they did the same, and it doesn’t.
  35. +1
    4 March 2018 18: 30
    Quote: Cherry Nine
    Quote: cedar
    and not from the head of the executive branch in the Russian Federation, Prime Minister Medvedev

    You have jokes.

    80.3. The President of the Russian Federation, in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal laws, determines the main directions of the state’s domestic and foreign policy.
    ...
    84. a) appoint, with the consent of the State Duma, the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation;

    b) has the right to chair meetings of the Government of the Russian Federation;

    c) makes a decision
    the resignation of the Government of the Russian Federation;
    ...
    e) upon the proposal of the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation
    appoints and dismisses
    from the position of Deputy Prime Ministers of the Russian Federation, federal ministers;


    Do not confuse sour with fresh.
    Read article 10 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation on State power.
    Where is the presidential power? She is in your imagination and nothing more.
    1. +2
      4 March 2018 18: 44
      Quote: cedar
      Read article 10 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation on State power.

      State power in the Russian Federation is exercised on the basis of division into legislative, executive and judicial. The legislative, executive and judicial authorities are independent.

      What world do you live in? Are there pink unicorns there?
      Quote: cedar
      Where is the presidential power? She is in your imagination and nothing more.

      In your edition of the Constitution, some liberal snatched out the 4th chapter. Change for the whole.
  36. +2
    4 March 2018 19: 21
    An unnamed research institution was able to develop an ultra-powerful small-sized nuclear power plant (NPP)

    "" What do you think of a nuclear drive? " - Genka inquired. “The old man,” Athos answered briefly. “I agree,” said the Captain and looked at Athos with interest. “And the photon annihilation?” "So-so," said Athos, shaking his head sadly. Then Genka asked him his basic question: which systems seem more promising - gravitational or gravitational. "I recognize only the D-principle," Athos arrogantly declared ... "
    Return (Noon, 22nd Century)
    wink
  37. +2
    4 March 2018 19: 44
    Quote: Ierarh
    What kind of smoke during reactor operation? With both strontium air. From one cold to another hot ...

    smoke is nitrogen dioxide NO2 gas, a reddish-brown color, is formed at high temperature from air
    1. 0
      4 March 2018 20: 47
      I can’t believe that the working medium - air - is too low a flight speed (envelope relief). Although it should be used somehow, as the cooler is used up (on the working fluid)
    2. 0
      4 March 2018 21: 29
      Smoke is the starting turbojet engine, but the direct-flow engine must be “started up”, having dispersed at least 0.3 ... 0.4M
  38. +3
    4 March 2018 19: 59
    At the end of his message, Putin said very important words that all these developments could be provided only by a country with developed science, and here is the only place where I believed him ....
  39. +4
    4 March 2018 20: 20
    As I read more and more comments, I am convinced that it is very difficult to abandon the long-established and well-established political picture of the world, especially if this picture suits you.
    Alas, all these moans - “this is impossible”, “we didn’t see anything except the movie”, “well, the gas station couldn’t and all”, etc. - all the suffering and painful search for at least some argument refuting this breakthrough doesn’t cancel reality, and it is this: Russia has created a weapon that seems fantastic and this changes the entire political landscape of the world. With what all and congratulations!
  40. +1
    4 March 2018 20: 21
    Quote: Vadim237
    All the rest

    imho
    fuel - uranium-233 nitride.
    core material is an alloy of tantalum, niobium and zirconium.
    Thermal Power 0.5mW
    MGDG is not there.
    1. 0
      4 March 2018 21: 02
      According to the description, it looks more like a YaRD 0410 - it is difficult to expensive and overall.
      1. 0
        4 March 2018 21: 22
        No, NRE has nothing to do with it.
        Here- YaPVRD — about something like here (the material was there, 5 years ago :), but - more compactly:
        https://topwar.ru/35496-pluton-yadernoe-serdce-dl
        ya-sverhzvukovoy-nizkovysotnoy-krylatoy-rakety.ht
        ml
    2. +1
      4 March 2018 21: 28
      A thermal power of 0.5 MW will not provide a 0.5-0.7 ton nuclear ramjet thrust required for a normal RS flight with X-101 mass and dimensional characteristics (for an X-101, a marching turbofan engine has about 0.6 tons of thrust). Thermal power should be an order of magnitude greater.
  41. +1
    4 March 2018 20: 45
    Quote: RusskiyMos
    while it will be stored, it rebuilds everything and everyone around

    disposable reactor. fuel before the first start-up is almost not fonit
    1. 0
      4 March 2018 21: 21
      Hm? Phonite, but slightly less than in the active phase of work. Spontaneous division, alas, does not turn off :)
  42. +1
    4 March 2018 21: 14
    Quote: Vadim237
    expensive and overall

    The price of tantalum is 17000 r / kg, niobium is 450 r / kg. It is not expensive. Dimensions are visible on video - core diameter is less than 0.5m. This is not dimensional.
  43. 0
    4 March 2018 21: 20
    JAPDR. Yes, the solution is real (it was still possible 50 years ago), but it’s very “dirty”: the compact phonite reactor itself in all directions (there’s practically no biosecurity) + pollution along the route (“blowing” out of the core with the flow + irradiation of the working fluid) . How the Doomsday Weapon will go, the rest will not.
    1. 0
      5 March 2018 01: 14
      As well as storage, maintenance and transportation - are dangerous for personnel - so a nuclear-powered rocket engine without protection, is immediately discarded on a cruise missile. No one will put an active zone on a cruise missile. And do the same exercises with her over her head.
      1. 0
        5 March 2018 13: 20
        Quote: Vadim237
        No one will put an active zone on a cruise missile

        It seems that you underestimate the Sovereign and his team of effective managers.
    2. +2
      5 March 2018 13: 06
      The product has already been christened quite accurately:
      "Flying Chernobyl"
  44. +1
    4 March 2018 21: 23
    Quote: Bersaglieri
    "fonit" in all directions

    in the direction of the thermonuclear warhead does not fonit - protection is there.
  45. +1
    4 March 2018 21: 41
    Quote: Bersaglieri
    Phonite, but a little less than in the active phase of work

    a little less - this is quite a bit, only about 10000 times less than in the active phase of work :)
    1. 0
      4 March 2018 22: 10
      Svetlana, who are you by profession / education? I am a physicist. :)
      So, I’ll tell you, not at 10000, but at about 500. But even this is enough to kill you within a minute if you stand 10 meters from the “product” :)
  46. +1
    4 March 2018 21: 56
    Yeah ... This is not for you "Turchinov Rocket" ... lol
  47. 0
    4 March 2018 22: 02
    Quote: Bersaglieri
    Thermal power of 0.5 MW will not provide a 0.5–0.7 ton nuclear ramjet thrust required for a normal flight of the KR with mass-dimensional characteristics of the X-101

    This is not the X-101. For speed V = 250m / s and traction F = 450kg, power W = F * V = 1.125MW but not 5MW
    1. 0
      5 March 2018 00: 03
      Efficiency for 100% think? :)
      1. 0
        5 March 2018 08: 24
        Quote: Bersaglieri
        Efficiency for 100% think?

        Of course. It's not an electric generator. 100% of the heat released from the active zone is carried away by the heated exhaust air. Otherwise, if the released heat accumulated in the core, then it would quickly melt.
    2. +1
      5 March 2018 00: 04
      True: not X101-heavier and more oversized :)
    3. 0
      5 March 2018 01: 26
      This rocket has a speed somewhere in the range of 290 meters per second - in fact, this is already a barrage of ammunition with a flight range of 40000 kilometers and I will remain on my own, that there is YATSU.
  48. +1
    4 March 2018 22: 19
    Quote: Bersaglieri
    not in 10000, but in about 500

    Let's count. The half-life of uranium-233 is approximately 7340 years. We round up to 10000 years. With an active phase of operation at rated power, the fuel will burn out by half in about 1 year. Which is exactly 10000 times less, but not at all 500.
  49. 0
    5 March 2018 00: 57
    Quote: Slavs
    That would immediately laid out the drawings ...

    So that the "partners" realized that we are not bluffing, we will show not only the drawings, but also the production process.
    Okay, I'm sharing an insider. wassat laughing

    Threat. This is the trolling of our "Western partners" and those who believe in the backwardness of our defense industry.
  50. 0
    5 March 2018 01: 20
    Everything rests on the leadership’s determination to use WMD at hour X. The defense doctrine should provide for the use of nuclear weapons first, including preventively! For example, the Germans invade Kaliningrad, but after 20 minutes, 30-40 million sausage lovers burn out under the blows of "Stiletto" and "Topol". A 155 mm caliber projectile that flies into our territory should be instantly answered with the same random shot of a Fata, Puncher or Kleschevina!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  51. FID
    +1
    5 March 2018 09: 27
    Cartoon is good!
  52. 0
    5 March 2018 13: 39
    It's also a cool platform for new flying things. Like “endless” AWACS, reconnaissance, patrolling, one might say, for days in a given area... Well, of course, it’s a matter of size. It’s hard to imagine an aircraft with such a thing instead of a turbojet engine. I'm silent about space. The Chinese created a joint lunar center the next day. They were probably waiting...
    Question. During testing, where did they drop the nuclear reactor with the rocket? Or did it have a chassis? They will show us what they smell as adversaries. We'll choke on the drool...Environmentally friendly drool, of course, the Gulf of Mexico is right up their ass.
    1. 0
      5 March 2018 14: 07
      Quote: sleeve
      It's also a cool platform for new flying things. Like “endless” AWACS, reconnaissance, patrolling, one might say, for days in a given area... Well, of course, it’s a matter of size. It’s hard to imagine an aircraft with such a thing instead of a turbojet engine. I'm silent about space. The Chinese created a joint lunar center the next day. They were probably waiting...
      Question. During testing, where did they drop the nuclear reactor with the rocket? Or did it have a chassis? They will show us what they smell as adversaries. We'll choke on the drool...Environmentally friendly drool, of course, the Gulf of Mexico is right up their ass.


      And this is also an excellent thing for radioactive contamination of the air - a small flying Chernobyl, since the reactor has no protection.
  53. +1
    5 March 2018 14: 03
    Historians of weapons and military equipment, as well as the interested public, are well aware that the idea of ​​a nuclear engine for an airplane or a rocket appeared a few decades ago. Moreover, the leading countries tried to create real equipment with such equipment. However, none of the bold projects have progressed beyond the testing phase. For this reason, the newest Russian cruise missile with NPIs in the near future will be able to earn the honorary title of a technical breakthrough.


    No matter how she becomes the prototype of Hiroshima in the sky...
    It is known that plane crashes involving nuclear weapons carriers involved quite a few 14 events on the ground and in the air:
    https://pikabu.ru/story/avarii_s_nositelyami_yade
    rnogo_oruzhiya_ostorozhno_ochen_dlinnopost_s_1292
    600.

    In addition, events at sea:
    In March 1996, Greenpeace published data according to which as a result of accidents 51 nuclear munitions were lost in the seas and oceans (44 by the Soviet Union and seven by the United States). In addition, seven nuclear reactors (five Soviet and two American) from three nuclear submarines of the USSR and two US nuclear submarines sank during accidents. Another 19 nuclear reactors (18 - USSR, 1 - USA) were deliberately flooded into the sea (Greenpeace, 1996).
  54. 0
    5 March 2018 22: 18
    What if there is no rocket? The swindlers lied that the rocket had a nuclear propulsion engine and showed the developments. Quite high quality and existing, but not working. A rocket with a conventional kerosene engine was launched. Little did we know of similar stories for obtaining funding...
  55. 0
    6 March 2018 00: 27
    This is how you need to do it: further from Skolkovo, further from HSE in the distance: from the “echoes” and “rains”; Far from the Russophobic, liberal crowd, but with your mind and heart feeling the aspirations of Russia, you can expect the emergence of other breakthrough technologies
  56. The comment was deleted.
  57. The comment was deleted.
  58. 0
    8 March 2018 23: 34
    It feels like I ended up in a kindergarten or on a website for schoolchildren, the degree of cretinism is off the charts
    - And we, and with us, and we will f*** you all.
  59. 0
    17 January 2019 14: 53
    Quote: professor
    The Cold War has reached a new level.

    The Cold War is the destiny of the last century, because 100 RYA (Nuclear Backpack) cool the ardor of many thousands of warheads. © AS