Military Review

NATO: Our missile defense is not directed against Russia. - What is your evidence?

91
At NATO headquarters, they decided not to stay aside from the comments on the message of the President of Russia to the Federal Assembly. In general, judging by the ratings of speeches by politicians since the beginning of 2018, the message of Vladimir Putin became the most quoted in the world. The statements of the President of the Russian Federation about the launching of a hypersonic test on the combat duty of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation caused the greatest response. weapons, as well as other advanced developments in the field of armaments.


Recall that Vladimir Putin, in his message, noted that Russia would view the deployment of US nuclear (tactical) warheads in non-nuclear NATO countries as a direct threat of a nuclear attack with all the ensuing consequences.

A spokeswoman for NATO, Oana Lungesku, said today that "Russia's statements are threatening in nature" and are "unacceptable and counterproductive."

Lungescu:
Our missile defense system is designed to respond to attacks from outside Europe and North America. It is not directed against Russia.


NATO: Our missile defense is not directed against Russia. - What is your evidence?

NATO contingent in Estonia


This is not the first such statement, which, like all previous ones, is not supported by any official evidence of the direction of the American missile defense system against the Russian Federation.

Lungescu:
NATO has to implement a dual approach towards Russia because of its aggressive actions in Ukraine. We are pursuing a policy of containment, combining it with defense and dialogue.


And why, in this case, does the dialogue between NATO and Russia resemble a monologue of the USA? .. And where is the limit to NATO expansion?
Photos used:
https://twitter.com/NATOpress
91 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. the most important
    the most important 2 March 2018 18: 59
    +75
    Well, so our weapons are not directed against NATO. Everything is exclusively against the dictatorial regime in Limpopo, which threatens the whole world with its chemical missiles! And therefore, NATO should relax and not worry ... The process (..) has begun and cannot be stopped.
    1. Sofa General
      Sofa General 2 March 2018 19: 00
      +18
      yes ... we defend ourselves from the Mexican drug lords ...
      1. siberalt
        siberalt 2 March 2018 19: 06
        +29
        The NATO umbrella was full of holes, that’s raging. What Europe paid for, that’s the question! And this is not a frail American bred and scam.winked Let them figure it out themselves, but Putin still needs to make a “breakthrough” in the economy.
        1. hrych
          hrych 2 March 2018 19: 31
          +4
          Quote: siberalt
          feeble american bred and kidalovo

          What is your evidence?

          1. krot
            krot 2 March 2018 19: 59
            +3
            The proof that the missile defense is directed against Russia will be its gradual folding, and not bringing it to the declared logical end, against the background of a "holey umbrella." How lost its relevance!
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 2 March 2018 23: 28
              +2
              And where is the limit to NATO expansion?
              And the limit to NATO expansion will not even be exceeded in the foreseeable future!
              Moreover, NATO has long rested against the borders of Russia, and the NATO countries, led by the Pentagon, are not even going to stop in fact about their further expansion! But beyond the borders of Russia for the further expansion of NATO, this is already the territory of the Russian Federation! And the expansion of NATO in this case beyond the Russian border is nothing more than a direct aggression of NATO against Russia! Those. aggressive war from the collective West!

              So, at the NATO headquarters, let the NATO members do nothing to NATO in favor of Washington!
          2. a.sirin
            a.sirin 2 March 2018 23: 01
            0
            It's better to keep quiet about cocaine ... Argentina, s ... embassy, ​​s ...
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. dvina71
              dvina71 3 March 2018 16: 39
              0
              Quote: a.sirin
              It's better to keep quiet about cocaine ... Argentina, s ... embassy, ​​s ...

              Argentina. Technical building of the embassy (school), cocakin, FSB, arrest .. So right ..
      2. volodya
        volodya 2 March 2018 19: 08
        +20
        Their weapons are not aimed at Russia, good, good! But we know that it is directed at us! America overseas, and its weapons for some reason around us!
      3. jovanni
        jovanni 2 March 2018 19: 54
        +5
        Quote: Sofa General
        yes ... we defend ourselves from the Mexican drug lords ...

        And also from aliens. Insolently completely, Herods. I saw it myself. In the movie "Men in Black." What is not proof ...
      4. Alex_Rarog
        Alex_Rarog 2 March 2018 21: 41
        +1
        And who has already bought their tickets to the chief staff in pen?)
    2. 210ox
      210ox 2 March 2018 19: 05
      +3
      Yeah .. Relax and have fun .. And then yelled-rape!
      Quote: the most important
      Well, so our weapons are not directed against NATO. Everything is exclusively against the dictatorial regime in Limpopo, which threatens the whole world with its chemical missiles! And therefore, NATO should relax and not worry ...
    3. Monos
      Monos 2 March 2018 19: 05
      +26
      And why, then, does the dialogue between NATO and Russia resemble a US monologue?

      good good Bravo to the author for this passage.
      Our missile defense system is designed to respond to attacks from outside Europe and North America.

      And then we thought that it was against missile launches within the European Union !!! And where do they get such stupid cows? Probably specially trained ...
      1. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov 2 March 2018 19: 15
        +9
        Quote: Monos
        And why, then, does the dialogue between NATO and Russia resemble a US monologue?

        good good Bravo to the author for this passage.

        Join Monos! soldier
        This time no one will be able to confuse us with our head .. "US Peace Initiatives"
        Russia will fight to the last .. Remember this gentlemen!
        Well, to raise morale and cries of the liberals ..
        I like it ALL men! We work .....
      2. iliitchitch
        iliitchitch 2 March 2018 19: 31
        +2
        Quote: Monos
        And where do they get such stupid cows? Probably specially trained ...

        They are all the more stupid because they are trying to convince the last goat on the last collective farm, which since childhood has known against whom and what is directed.
        ".. what is your evidence ..". Axioms do not require evidence.
        1. Dryuya2
          Dryuya2 2 March 2018 19: 45
          +6
          from an adventure, "rested" today winked
      3. major147
        major147 2 March 2018 21: 10
        +3
        And where do they get such stupid cows? Probably specially trained ...
        Tribal!
      4. pjastolov
        pjastolov 2 March 2018 21: 19
        +4
        Quote: Monos
        And where do they get such stupid cows?

        special farms - cloning, Victor hi hi
        1. Monos
          Monos 2 March 2018 22: 17
          +4
          Good evening, Volodya hi
          Quote: pjastolov
          special farms - breed by cloning

          Some are genetically modified. smile
          1. pjastolov
            pjastolov 2 March 2018 22: 22
            +4
            Quote: Monos
            Some are genetically modified.

            Well, what they are, this is so that they could not reproduce themselves, but only through certified seed material laughing
            1. Abel
              Abel 4 March 2018 23: 09
              0
              McCain has already erased all hands
    4. DMB_95
      DMB_95 2 March 2018 19: 18
      +13
      Lungescu:
      ..... We are implementing a containment policy, combining it with defense and dialogue
      Do not believe it, we are doing the same thing. For about a thousand years.
    5. K-50
      K-50 2 March 2018 19: 21
      +4
      Quote: the most important
      NATO should relax and not worry ..

      Well, you also said "relax." They can relax before the "bear illness" and not reach the toilets. yes
    6. Spartanez300
      Spartanez300 2 March 2018 19: 28
      +2
      NATO is an enemy, and we are a confrontation. Until this turns over there will be no friendship.
    7. ancestors from Don
      ancestors from Don 2 March 2018 20: 10
      +1
      Our missiles are not directed against NATO, what is your evidence?
    8. Spartanez300
      Spartanez300 2 March 2018 20: 35
      +2
      Guys without any evidence if you need ...................
      We have a lot to whom to speak for the country.
    9. Maz
      Maz 2 March 2018 23: 09
      0
      There is, we have evidence, just now their Israeli colleagues draw on their satellite ... laughing
    10. Red_Hamer
      Red_Hamer 3 March 2018 05: 18
      0
      with chemical weapons threatens the whole world!
      Is this the same brutal castor?
  2. Anton Boldakov
    Anton Boldakov 2 March 2018 18: 59
    +4
    Apparently they understand that in the event of troubles with the US, NATO will be the first in the queue to receive "hot gifts." Although in their case - before you had to be smarter.
  3. lance
    lance 2 March 2018 19: 01
    +4
    NATO !!! guys !!! Now we believe that !!!
    1. just exp
      just exp 2 March 2018 19: 36
      +4
      Well, yes, especially after the article about what mattresses wanted, after videos about Russian weapons, an orbital radar for tracking hypersonic gliders.
      well, definitely against Iran and Korea, and certainly not against Russia.
  4. urman
    urman 2 March 2018 19: 02
    +5
    Our missile defense system is designed to respond to attacks from outside Europe and North America. It is not directed against Russia. \\\\\\
    And our missiles are not against Nata, but against Samali pirates, you worry.
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 2 March 2018 19: 04
    +1
    And what do we need about their missile defense? What will she protect them from? From us - no ...
  6. Herculesic
    Herculesic 2 March 2018 19: 06
    +15
    And why did you then cling to our very borders - also against Iran and North Korea? fool How tired of us, you filthy hypocrites! fool am I knocked you off yesterday’s arrogance from Putin’s report! am
    1. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 2 March 2018 19: 24
      +12
      Quote: Herkulesich
      And why did you then cling to our very borders - also against Iran and North Korea?

      Yes, their women, they are driven to us by Vitalyevich ... They really want Russian men. "evil and merciless" in Europe! laughing soldier

      Oh psaki girl ...
      1. Dym71
        Dym71 2 March 2018 19: 56
        +1
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Oh psaki girl ...

        Oh, Vitaliy! Well, Zhenechka doesn’t get out of your head! wassat
      2. Okolotochny
        Okolotochny 2 March 2018 21: 12
        +6
        Vitaly, how was the child named with Zhenya? lol
        1. Vitaly Anisimov
          Vitaly Anisimov 2 March 2018 22: 59
          +1
          Quote: Okolotochny
          Vitaly, how was the child named with Zhenya? lol

          I don’t know, but I think Donald! Well, insisted on Volodya. laughing drinks
          1. Okolotochny
            Okolotochny 2 March 2018 23: 15
            +6
            I do not know but think Donald!
            Oh you, and also the father is called.
    2. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 3 March 2018 01: 26
      +1
      It was not they who clung to the borders of Russia, but Russia clung to its borders with NATE. Understand the insolent jokes of Saxony!
  7. B.T.V.
    B.T.V. 2 March 2018 19: 08
    +3
    Faberge were not at all Faberge firms (s) ...
  8. Masya masya
    Masya masya 2 March 2018 19: 10
    +25
    old songs about the main thing ...
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 2 March 2018 19: 20
      +3
      Marina love these songs for them may end with massive obituaries, and long rows of new graves in European cemeteries! am
      1. Yngvar
        Yngvar 2 March 2018 20: 46
        +4
        I suppose that after the use of such weapons and cemeteries are not needed, I darted a whisk on the scoop and that's it ...
    2. tv70
      tv70 3 March 2018 04: 24
      +2
      There is no character in the illustration, namely, a Russian man with his pants down, turned his back to NATO, calmly coping with the need, with the newspaper Pravda in his hands. And so, the offset.
  9. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 2 March 2018 19: 12
    +4
    Our missile defense system is designed to respond to attacks from outside Europe and North America. It is not directed against Russia.

    Part of Russia is located outside Europe and certainly beyond North America. In the last sentence, “not” is superfluous. One question: where are these mattresses de.Bills taught to lie?
    1. Ascetic
      Ascetic 2 March 2018 22: 18
      +6
      Quote: Alex-a832
      Part of Russia is located outside Europe and certainly beyond North America.

      Let them scold us from the western capitals -
      We don’t give a damn about them, we won’t take us for a show:
      Russia has no boundaries!
      Russia has only the horizon!

      Putin: Russia's borders are not ending anywhere.
  10. kit88
    kit88 2 March 2018 19: 12
    +3
    And now we do not care what you say there. Yes, and we have heard these excuses for about 10 years. That's it. Let's goodbye.
    Now, get out of your way, so that we would agree to listen to you.
  11. prior
    prior 2 March 2018 19: 15
    +2
    Well, what partners, wait ?!
    Everything can be said now - nothing can be done, the answer will arrive guaranteed!
  12. Observer2014
    Observer2014 2 March 2018 19: 16
    +2
    A spokeswoman for NATO, Oana Lungesku, said today that "Russia's statements are threatening in nature" and are "unacceptable and counterproductive."
    Yes, they go through the forest. Yes, the new Russian military-industrial complex allows it to deliver a disarming strike against NATO. Experiencing now
    1. Abel
      Abel 4 March 2018 23: 13
      0
      Lungescu is a Romanian. A very belligerent power. They won the last victory when they were called Dacians. and then lost
  13. cats
    cats 2 March 2018 19: 25
    +6
    NATO has to implement a dual approach towards Russia because of its aggressive actions in Ukraine. We are pursuing a policy of containment, combining it with defense and dialogue.
    Cut the fly gentlemen, before it's too late .. hi
  14. Geisenberg
    Geisenberg 2 March 2018 19: 31
    0
    And then against whom is it directed? If you throw away all the nonsense about Iran and Somali pirates ...
    1. Vasyan1971
      Vasyan1971 2 March 2018 19: 42
      +1
      Quote: Geisenberg
      And then against whom is it directed? If you throw away all the nonsense about Iran and Somali pirates ...

      Maybe against the strongest army in Europe? And then there are many, many wild monkeys (banderlog). Suddenly they ... they will jump!
  15. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 2 March 2018 19: 40
    +4
    "Our missile defense system is designed to respond to attacks from outside Europe and North America. It is not directed against Russia."
    And our missile defense system is designed to respond to attacks from all sides. Therefore, it is aimed at everyone. Just in case.
  16. Dikson
    Dikson 2 March 2018 19: 59
    +7
    I understand the euphoria and pride in the country after the speech of our president .. I understand the cheers-patriotic topic of posts here about yet another "hat-making" and wunderwaffles ... Surely no one heard in the speech of our commander in chief a simple thing: - a small-scale analyst will tell you! If we discard the election campaign and the candidate’s game on the military-patriotic pipe, it turns out that the West categorically does not want Putin for another term, and, obviously, the question of a direct military conflict with NATO is almost inevitable. And in the very near future. We will not be allowed to hold elections in the country. Either in Syria or in Ukraine, a blow will be dealt. Obviously, this became known to our SVR .. That is why the Commander-in-Chief had to remove all secrecy from product development .. Obviously, the degree of tension reached a critical point. It is not a matter of military-patriotic euphoria .. The fact is that in the next two weeks a war will start ... full-blown .. - The Western press compares Putin’s speech with Khrushchev’s speech to the UN, with his famous boot. Well after all. I would very much like to believe that these are not hypersonic Vasyuki .. For I personally can’t imagine such that in one and the same country - some missiles, time-tested, cannot take off, and others - make the long-awaited revolution in the history of rocket science .. The time for jokes is over ... Do you understand this, people in uniform?
    1. dauria
      dauria 2 March 2018 20: 19
      +4
      The time for jokes is over ... Do you understand this, people in uniform?


      Yes calm down. There are a lot of people in the country who go to bed and get up with the understanding that the day may be the last for 250 million people on the planet. Everyday. A long time ago. From the time of Khrushchev and earlier. And speech to the public has nothing to do with it.
      1. Dikson
        Dikson 2 March 2018 22: 33
        0
        So I really would not want it, on the one hand, to make it a public speech, and on the other hand, I would like the incomprehensible herd of cheers on the resource to realize the reasons for this “revelation” of our Commander-in-Chief .. This is not about Turkish tomatoes, agree ?
    2. Yuri Simple
      Yuri Simple 2 March 2018 20: 49
      +7
      Dear Dikson!
      You see what’s the matter. This: “The West categorically does not want Putin for another term” does not concern us. He, the West will have to wipe himself. Since it is not up to the West to decide whom to be presidents of the Russian Federation. And it would be time to understand and accept this fact there. If the West imagined that he would decide who the president is in Russia, then he should wake up and forget this nightmare. And what and how they compare there - to me, for example, personally, it’s deeply violet. And I personally strongly recommend that you unlearn your eyes on the writings of Western newspapers. If only because Nikita Sergeyevich’s speech at the UN, with the knocking boot that they remember, is a fake. He pounded with his boot while sitting in the composition of the Soviet delegation in reaction to his speech. By the way, they don’t remember about white powder? Why so? And about his recent lies about the Russian-Georgian war? Why would they suddenly become truthful right now? So it's purple. But Amer’s multi-billion dollar missile defense was covered with a copper basin. Taking into account the recent remarks of a certain Amer’s prezik with its fundamental “torn to shreds Russian economy,” I enjoy the fact of complete US paraffin with this missile defense system. Exactly the same as the inhabitants of the United States experienced, listening to the "torn to shreds" Bash on the bash. An eye for an eye!
      Yes, what I said personally will not hurt me to vote for Grudinin.
      1. Dikson
        Dikson 2 March 2018 23: 10
        0
        “The West categorically does not want Putin for another term, and, obviously, the question of a direct military conflict with NATO is almost inevitable” - that’s what I wrote about .. You gave a detailed and fiery answer only to the first part of my proposal ..)) in many ways I agree with you. To me deeply to Peter, how many billions of other people's foreign money will this or that government invest in idiotic, at first glance, floodlights ..- these are their difficulties .. The main idea of ​​my post above was that our leader actually admitted that we stand by the threshold of war.
        1. sharp-lad
          sharp-lad 3 March 2018 01: 33
          +1
          Well tady the whole world is in ruins and let them not cherish the hope of sitting behind a puddle.
    3. Separ
      Separ 2 March 2018 21: 59
      +3
      People in uniform answered: ".. not sts .. let's get through ..."
      1. Dikson
        Dikson 2 March 2018 23: 12
        0
        I still unlearn the "stsat" training ..))
    4. gurzuf
      gurzuf 3 March 2018 18: 51
      0
      So how do you suggest Katz give up?
  17. sauvage
    sauvage 2 March 2018 20: 02
    +2
    So many years and money - all in vain (ABM). Now Russia already has a weapon capable of delivering a lightning-quick disarming strike against the United States. Roles have changed; hegemon is no longer hegemon.
  18. worms
    worms 2 March 2018 20: 13
    +1
    NATO: Our missile defense is not directed against Russia. - What is your evidence?

    Russia: Our nuclear weapons are not directed against America. -What is your evidence?
  19. faterdom
    faterdom 2 March 2018 20: 24
    +3
    Stevenson had such a series of stories "The Adventures of Prince Florizel", among which the first is the "Suicide Club" (an excellent film was shot back in the USSR with Banionis).
    There, people who wanted to take their own lives, but did not dare to do so, entered there so that the founder of “Checkered” would solve this problem for them. At least with their own hands, and at their own expense.
    So the States - this is “Checkered”, and those who joined NATO a long time ago, or are rushing there now - are just members of this interesting club of those who are tired or fresh of life.
  20. vik669
    vik669 2 March 2018 20: 55
    +1
    What is your evidence? Our evidence is packaged in "Iskander" in "Samrat" will be strongly asked to come with warmth and light!
  21. zivXP
    zivXP 2 March 2018 21: 11
    0
    If they say A, then we should say B - this is so for understanding. Against whom then, maybe we are also against those who are NOT FOR or AGAINST. Let poor Papuans tremble twice, or even triple.
  22. demo
    demo 2 March 2018 21: 15
    +3
    Our missile defense system is designed to respond to attacks from outside Europe and North America. It is not directed against Russia.
    Lungescu, are you either a fool, or are you mowing like that?
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 3 March 2018 01: 36
      +1
      They’re just so used to lying that they take any lie for the ultimate truth.
  23. major147
    major147 2 March 2018 21: 16
    +3
    German Minister of Defense Ursula von der Leyen, speaking at a meeting of the European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee and the Security and Defense Subcommittee in Strasbourg, said negotiations with Moscow should be held from a “position of strength”.

    Well, that's goal number 1.
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 2 March 2018 21: 47
      +6
      Quote: major147
      German defense minister said negotiations with Moscow should be from a "position of strength."
      Yes, like that I took and framed ALL Germany. For the third time, no one will definitely understand "where is Hitler, and where is the German people." Barely seventy years have passed, and already warlike notes began to erupt ... and most importantly - who !!! am They still, at least, have to sit as much under the bench, peacefully trading in what they produce ... But no, everything draws on "feats", yeah. And they, it seems, are completely not breaking off the logical result of these campaigns:
    2. Separ
      Separ 2 March 2018 22: 02
      +5
      "from a position of strength .." - I don’t know such a feminine position ... love
      1. sharp-lad
        sharp-lad 3 March 2018 01: 39
        +4
        This is when a woman snuggles strongly against you and forcibly falls on herself! smile
  24. Separ
    Separ 2 March 2018 21: 54
    0
    Probably theirs ABM is directed against aliens ..
  25. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 2 March 2018 21: 59
    +1
    Hah, they crap one's pants, and now they make excuses. Rear-wheel drive rails.
  26. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 2 March 2018 22: 33
    +1
    To all the cries and show-offs:
  27. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 2 March 2018 23: 50
    +2
    Putin, as an experienced intelligence officer, understood that the last part of the annual message is best remembered.
  28. Prisoner
    Prisoner 3 March 2018 00: 34
    0
    Well, of course, guys, of course. For the sole purpose of stopping threats emanating from Iceland and Latin America. Here we have the same garbage with missiles. Only against the evil penguins of Antarctica and nothing more.
  29. Orionvit
    Orionvit 3 March 2018 01: 30
    0
    NATO has to take a double approach to Russia because of its aggressive actions in Ukraine.
    It is time to explain to them that the actions of Russia in Ukraine (which by the way still by and large have not even begun) are Russia's internal affairs.
  30. lance
    lance 3 March 2018 04: 27
    0
    the reality is that about the pretext. dual-purpose launchers, they have already been instructed, now the US is leaving the ground-based land-based cruise missiles in these installations: 1-stage launch, 2-stage destruction of those sent in response. I wonder who is now in Europe and the United States agree to the first stage? maybe Europe will remember its promises and withdraw all military infrastructure from the borders of the Russian Federation and we will not need to place the second step of the Sarmatian along the eastern borders.
  31. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 3 March 2018 10: 43
    +2
    The fact that the US missile defense is not deployed against Russia is clear to everyone. But elections are coming soon.
    And how to unite voters? The most effective and simplest: "Russia in the ring of enemies."
    1. dvina71
      dvina71 3 March 2018 16: 48
      +4
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The fact that the US missile defense is not deployed against Russia is clear to everyone.

      Especially located in Alaska .., it is visible against polar bears ..
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 4 March 2018 13: 18
        0
        It is against China and North Korea. Sharpened for interception
        missiles fired from the Far East through the North Pacific.
        Russia shoots ICBMs across the Arctic Ocean.
        Alaskan missile defense is ineffective in this case.
        Here it is necessary to put missile defense missiles in Canada, Iceland, Greenland.
        1. dvina71
          dvina71 4 March 2018 13: 53
          0
          Quote: voyaka uh
          It is against China and North Korea. Sharpened for interception

          You have good tales .. I even wanted to sleep ..
  32. Alexander Prikhodko
    Alexander Prikhodko 3 March 2018 11: 03
    +1
    anyone can pretend to be a jerk - every day they insist that Russia is an enemy and not about Russia - it's ridiculous - they themselves asked now to get
  33. gurzuf
    gurzuf 3 March 2018 18: 46
    +1
    It would be necessary that something be returned to Cuba, whether Eun will start to fire on the Indians. And so that by mistake we wouldn’t accidentally fly into the island of freedom as a chef, we’ll install our own help and not ... one wink
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 3 March 2018 21: 29
      0
      Quote: gurzuf
      It would be necessary that something be returned to Cuba, whether Eun will start to fire on the Indians. And so that by mistake we wouldn’t accidentally fly into the island of freedom as a chef, we’ll install our own help and not ... one wink

      Brilliance, and not just some commonplace idea of ​​the usual justification for the return of Russian military bases to Cuba! good
  34. Abel
    Abel 4 March 2018 23: 03
    0
    And we are doing exactly the same thing. We are not threatening anyone. In general, the mentioned weapons are aimed at protecting against the aggressive plans of the Central African Republic.
  35. vladimirasha
    vladimirasha 4 March 2018 23: 06
    0
    No, they just put it on guard just in case.