Russia one day nullified all military power of the West

47
1 March, Russian President Vladimir Putin delivered an annual message to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. In addition to the well-known topics, Putin paid great attention to the country's defense. The President presented a whole range of state-of-the-art weapons created in recent years.

For the first time, some characteristics of the more or less well-known Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile became known. As expected, the new ICBM will be able to attack the territory of the United States both across the North Pole and the South Pole. Thus, American missile defense systems in Europe and Alaska are becoming meaningless.



Surprise, however, were much more breakthrough types of weapons. First, it is a cruise missile with a nuclear power plant, which has no restrictions on the flight range. Secondly, the avant-garde hypersonic “winged block” capable of moving at a speed of about 20 Mach in dense layers of the atmosphere. Thirdly, this is a hypersonic airborne rocket "Dagger". And finally, an underwater nuclear unmanned strategic complex, as well as a combat laser.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    47 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +5
      2 March 2018 11: 46
      And this is not bad at all. maybe NATO’s arrogance will decrease.
    2. +5
      2 March 2018 11: 48
      Putin simply showed the West that under any circumstances, the end would be bad for them. And he gave time to digest what was said and shown.
    3. +3
      2 March 2018 11: 48
      Well, then in the near future we will see the surrender of the West.
      1. +3
        2 March 2018 19: 37
        Aaron Zawi
        Well, then in the near future we will see the surrender of the West.
        Comrade Aron Zaavi hi You will never see the surrender of Russia. By the way, how do you like the "Dagger" for example? How is your "Dome of Killer rocket iron killer" pulling there? bully I am silent about the rest. This 110% is not against you .. Your opinion is simply interesting.
        1. +1
          2 March 2018 21: 42
          Quote: Observer2014
          Aaron Zawi
          Well, then in the near future we will see the surrender of the West.
          Comrade Aron Zaavi hi You will never see the surrender of Russia. By the way, how do you like the "Dagger" for example? How is your "Dome of Killer rocket iron killer" pulling there? bully I am silent about the rest. This 110% is not against you .. Your opinion is simply interesting.
          The dome will definitely not pull. At least today.
          But the "Dagger" is still in no way. In addition to the cartoon, I did not see anything this time. And secondly

          New weapons are still unpredictable in terms of serial production, but it is already known that their individual samples will take up combat duty in the next 10 years, the former commander of the VKS said. Head of the Federation Council Defense Committee Viktor Bondarev.
          We are talking about a promising missile system with a planning winged block and a new cruise missile with a nuclear power plant.


          1. +3
            2 March 2018 22: 59
            Firstly, for amateurs, it is worth noting that any LA or surface or underwater swimming apparatus interacts with an elastic external environment through either a mover or through a physical process called “mass rejection.” An engine is only a device for converting fuel energy into a drive to a mover, if any That’s why nuclear fuel doesn’t solve the issues of achieving hyper-speed and other necessary parameters. Moreover, nuclear fuel has concentration or enrichment limits, and there is no technology for its concentration as an energy source. Therefore, such nuclear installations have no development prospects. talking about new physical principles is a complete misunderstanding of what is needed, but new algorithms for organizing physical processes are needed. Methods of mathematical analysis of such high-potential and information-intensive physical processes are also needed. Russia and the Americans do not. This is why the answers are obvious. if anyone owned n breakthrough technology applicable in the military field, this would be preceded by a process voiced in the scientific community. Military developments are always secondary after the scientific achievements of the geniuses of the mind.
            1. +1
              4 March 2018 14: 01
              And in general, if someone owned breakthrough technology applicable in the military field, this would be preceded by a process voiced in the scientific community. Military developments are always secondary after the scientific achievements of the geniuses of the mind.
              Especially in closed research institutes, which are located in closed cities like Snezhisk-17, along the perimeter of which there is a state border. Moreover, even according to Western ratings, Putin is the most influential politician in the world, and also smart, bold and cunning. He will not lie.
              1. 0
                4 March 2018 15: 30
                Mr. Putin is not lying. He, as always, is a victim of unreliable information from incompetent advisers. You do not know why, from time immemorial, under kings and emperors there were those who said things that were not always perceived adequately. The question is not in the people who said this, but in the information that was an alternative to universal opinion. And most of all, Putin himself voiced everything as it is, but this is not clear to the vast majority of people. A glider -planning from space, nuclear installations - is the basis of the development of the sixties and is fully consistent with the idea of ​​creating nuclear reactors that are already being used. Laser installations on crystals, but not on sonoluminescent processes. In general, everything is as old as the world, but for all this is a novelty because few people were interested in it until it attracted attention.
                1. +4
                  4 March 2018 23: 02
                  Quote: gridasov
                  everything is old as the world

                  Excuse Losers! Hence, your attitude to Putin is also clear.
                  1. 0
                    5 March 2018 10: 50
                    I do not understand. What kind of losers are you talking about?
            2. 0
              April 16 2018 13: 20
              nuclear fuel does not greatly solve the issues of achievement and hyperspeed and other necessary parameters

              there was no talk about hyperspeed, if you are about an announced missile with a nuclear installation
              .
              Glider Planning From Space

              this March 1 did not announce. Are you talking about the Buran ship?
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        2 March 2018 20: 48
        What's up with your nose, boy?
      3. +1
        2 March 2018 21: 22
        Need to organize a rocket biathlon? How in ancient times?
        1. +1
          3 March 2018 04: 35
          Soon there will be a rocket biathlon with mattresses, for they will never give up the unipolar world .. They will just die ..
    4. +5
      2 March 2018 12: 28
      There will be a lot of hysteria and bullying in Russia, but it won’t change anything ... They will shake money to counter the “new aggressive weapons” and introduce new sanctions ...
    5. +8
      2 March 2018 12: 47
      Only Sarmat and Dagger really showed. The rest is cartoons. And do we have many of these systems? Our defense budget is 11 times smaller than the US. When will the presidential candidate begin to raise the economy? He has been managing the country for 19 years, and Chubais is still at large.
      1. +19
        2 March 2018 12: 55
        Quote: Sergei Medvedev
        He has been managing the country for 19 years, and

        For me, so let it control as much. As if to persuade not to agree. If you want another president, then watch the television debate.
        1. +4
          2 March 2018 12: 59
          Quote: Terenin
          If you want another president, then watch the television debate.

          The television debate is a circus, I agree. But this president does not suit me either.
          1. +3
            2 March 2018 18: 38
            Well, is there one that suits you? Share the info, maybe I'll vote for him too.
            1. +1
              2 March 2018 21: 05
              I recall how the bulldogs of BAB and Gusinsky clung to E. Primakov in 2000
              Since then I have been voting for the one to whom the journalists are yapping the most.
              "So the man is standing"
              1. 0
                4 March 2018 00: 06
                Journalists then and now are two diametrically opposite things.
            2. 0
              4 March 2018 14: 05
              roses are red
              violets are blue
              I never went to the polls, but this time I’ll definitely go
              Something like this: D
          2. +5
            2 March 2018 22: 42
            Quote: Sergei Medvedev
            But this president does not suit me either.

            Your right. I am satisfied only because Putin V.V. I was able to reform the armed forces, maintain statehood and sovereignty (not to mention the accession of Crimea). And parking in a car is already not only problematic in the city due to personal transportation, but also in the countryside (this is what I mean by “living badly”).
            1. 0
              3 March 2018 00: 01
              Quote: Terenin
              (I mean the fact that we "live badly").

              Let him put Chubais and all the crooks from Abramovich to Grudinin (a swindler on a state farm scale) and live even better.
              1. +2
                3 March 2018 00: 56
                Quote: Sergei Medvedev
                Let him put Chubais and all the crooks from Abramovich to Grudinin (a swindler on a state farm scale)

                And you with us, what scale? Maybe you should start with?
              2. +4
                3 March 2018 20: 39
                Quote: Sergei Medvedev
                Let him put Chubais and all the crooks from Abramovich to Grudinin

                Well, well, let him land. Yes I'm not against. hi
      2. +2
        2 March 2018 12: 59

        Something reminds ...
      3. +2
        2 March 2018 13: 50
        Quote: Sergei Medvedev
        Really showed only Sarmat

        Moreover, the throw tests of the mass-size missile model wassat
        Quote: Sergei Medvedev
        The rest is cartoons.
        And very poor quality. Personal IMHO - I drew from any crazy major for one sleepless night and on a personal computer (judging by the quality of the textures used and rendering)
        And, I ask you to recall that these throwing tests passed at the end of the 17th year. And, I also ask you to remember that the “Armata” that passed through the Red Square promises to appear in the troops only by the twentieth year ... And you say to swim ... and the water is ice ....
        1. +3
          2 March 2018 18: 35
          These were not cartoons, but comics for the American layman. For them - the most accessible information format.
    6. +6
      2 March 2018 13: 18
      Yeah, the ATGM is modern, the aiming systems for helicopters ... we can’t do, but here Kuzkina’s mother is on a nuclear propulsion.
      1. +4
        2 March 2018 13: 25
        Yes, we, as it were, always did not exchange for trifles. ))) As in the joke:
        Once three heroes and three musketeers met and decided to compete in daring. The Musketeers begin the first. d'Artagnan says to Aramis pointing to Dobrynya:
        -Aramis, draw a small dot on it with chalk.
        Aramis goes up to Dobryna, carefully marks a completely invisible point on his chest with chalk. d'Artagnan hits her with a quick lunge. Dobrynya shakes herself off and says:
        -Alyosha, sprinkle him with chalk, I give him a mace e ...!
      2. 0
        2 March 2018 21: 16
        And Gagarin flew in his bast shoes. But did nuclear power plants, nuclear-powered ships, and nuclear weapons do in bast shoes?
        Here we have such a savvy people
      3. -1
        4 March 2018 14: 07
        Why didn’t the Sturm and Attack please you, and the sighting equipment Mi-24,28,35, Ka-50 and Ka-52 ???
        1. 0
          5 March 2018 09: 42
          Well, the sighting equipment Mi-24,28,35, Ka-50 and Ka-52 ???

          Are these the ones that call the death of the pilot?
          1. +1
            5 March 2018 10: 31
            Quote: MoJloT
            What did not please you "Storm" and "Attack"

            With a range of 5 km? When to launch it is necessary to enter the zone of defeat of military air defense?
    7. +3
      2 March 2018 13: 19
      Zero, it is said loudly. But he "gave a thick hint" to himself. While the United States played with small aerial drones, mainly for reconnaissance, we made strategic strike complexes. And the most dangerous thing is that you don’t know what will arrive - a vigorous mushroom or simply “salted”.
    8. +3
      2 March 2018 13: 56
      Russia one day nullified all military power of the West

      YES
      Uh
      1. +3
        2 March 2018 16: 09
        the picture is beautiful, the electorate is satisfied, and the fact that the "king is naked", consumers will not understand.
        1. +2
          2 March 2018 18: 36
          Consume less - you look in the head and brightens.
        2. 0
          2 March 2018 20: 59
          Comparable to the launch of the First Soviet Satellite.
    9. +3
      2 March 2018 18: 00
      not really like children ... the president has nothing to do but lie, and as many say "cartoons" here - but who is obliged to show the video to you as it is, it's all secret, rejoice that they showed at least that, and any of these weapons of the Russian Federation able to develop and release .... and how tired those who whine about "but what about the economy" -will be the core of the country, the backbone so that no one would dictate anything to it, there would be an economy. and a little money, go to work, it seems that living in Russia is bad
    10. +1
      2 March 2018 20: 51
      Trillions of bucks are thrown into the abyss.
      And what is Romania and Poland now?
      It’s like moving from a prima ballerina to work as cloakroom attendants.
      And in the case of "mess" will be the first to flog.
    11. +3
      2 March 2018 20: 55
      For the first time in 28 years, I had a feeling of at least some pride in my country.
      Thank you so much guys for your work.
    12. +2
      3 March 2018 00: 45
      Only now it is necessary, not only to brag about new weapons, but also to raise the standard of living of “darahghi rasiyans,” and to defend it skillfully in the international arena.
    13. +2
      3 March 2018 00: 48
      One small but IMPORTANT clarification.
      At first, AS ALWAYS, all these lyalki will be sold to China, and to other Arabs and Indians .. AND BECAUSE, when they earn some money on this, it is POSSIBLE to put in their army.
      Something like this. And the last decades are ONLY SO.
    14. +2
      3 March 2018 06: 33
      I am always very surprised by the argument of at least academicians on the comments. And you are skeptics, you wanted to show real samples with TTX)))). This is at least the "CC" signature stamp. And the West will never abandon attempts to destroy RUSSIA. Without a powerful defense, there will be no hospitals, kindergartens, etc.
    15. 0
      22 March 2018 18: 55
      You can’t even read the text enough heading “Europe in shock”, “America was scared”, “Russia in one day zeroed all the military power of the West” - Putin showed cartoons proud. And about the launch of the "Dagger" watch carefully the video. The plane took off in the afternoon with one tail number, launched a rocket at night and landed in the evening with another tail number, the video for suckers, like the well-known operation in Syria, be proud.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"