Putin's new weapon "destabilizes" America

72
The talking heads of the Pentagon pretended that the US Army was not surprised by Putin’s loud statements. US citizens can not worry. According to US military spokeswoman Dana White, the Pentagon is “fully prepared” to defend the country. As for Putin’s goals, then, according to representatives of the American ruling circles, the Russian leader is going to “destabilize” America.





As stated at the briefing Pentagon spokeswoman Dana W. White, U.S. defense not surprised when V.V. Putin made statements about contemporary Russian weapons. This was announced by Putin in his message to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation.

According to White, the Pentagon is “not surprised” by Mr. Putin’s statement. Americans can not worry: the army is "completely ready."

In addition, White told the press about the peace of the Pentagon. For example, the US missile defense system is not directed at all against Russia. They are set “for the most part” because of the policies of “rogue states”. Against Russia, the American "missile defense" has never been directed.

She also noted that the Pentagon is obliged to "guarantee" the American people the presence of "reliable nuclear deterrent."

“We are ready to defend our people, whatever the cost!” She stressed, not without pathos.

Recall that in Putin's message to the Federal Assembly, the main emphasis was placed on the military component. The President of the Russian Federation dwelled in detail on various types of powerful weapons, among which hypersonic weapons were named (the Avangard and Kinzhal complexes), combat lasers, nuclear submarines -Drones, a cruise missile with a nuclear power plant. Then the President spoke about the active phase of testing the Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile, which in the future will replace the Voyevoda missile (NATO prefers to call it Satan). Putin did not limit himself to words: a video recording of tests of a new ICBM was shown. Summing up, the Russian president noted that the new types of weapons are turning the US missile defense system, as well as bringing NATO's military infrastructure closer to Russia, into something meaningless.

Russia's statement on the development of new strategic weapons, "impenetrable for the defense of the West", is unlikely to change the balance of the world power, Robert Burns is convinced, the author Washington Post.

Russian nuclear missiles now have the ability to "destroy the American army," and the US defense strategy is based mainly on the deterrent threat of mass nuclear retaliation, but not on an impenetrable shield against Russian missiles, the journalist reminds. Some analysts say that President Putin’s statements on new weapons could accelerate the arms race in Russia and the United States. Last month, the United States called Russia the main reason for which the US had to develop two new types of nuclear weapons: a low-power warhead for a ballistic missile in submarines and a sea-based cruise missile.

The Trump administration has promised to expand US nuclear power in connection with the build-up of forces by Russia. And Putin’s new statements are unlikely to change this “equation” or turn Trump’s leadership off the path of modernizing the entire US nuclear arsenal worth hundreds of billions of dollars and expanding missile defense, the journalist ironically says.

Further, Burns develops an ironic attitude towards Russia, pointing out that after “a few days” Putin is expected to “win” another one six-year presidential term in the elections.

Putin’s statements about the new weapon, including the hypersonic rocket, “unparalleled in the world,” however, are not new to the Pentagon. Recently, the Pentagon just mentioned Russia's work on an “underwater drone with an intercontinental radius of action” and on hypersonic weapons, on which, by the way, both Washington and Beijing are working.

At the same time, the Pentagon did not publicly speak about the nuclear cruise missile that Putin described in his message. But here, there is nothing new: such weapons resemble those of the US 1960s. In the United States in those years, they worked on the creation of a similar weapon, which received the name "The Big Stick". In the end, it all went to the dump.

The White House, the author continues, confirmed that everything is well known to the US government about Russian weapons. “President Putin only confirmed what the United States government knew all the time. Although Russia denies this, it has been developing destabilizing weapons systems for more than a decade, thus directly violating its obligations under the treaties, ”the press secretary of the White House, Sarah Haqabi Sanders, who commented on Putin’s statements, quotes.

Speakers and persons of the US State Department.

State Department spokesman Heather Nauert also seemed to be overwhelmed with irony, as she said that Putin "was flirting with the audience." In her opinion, "Putin's boasting is irresponsible."

Heather Nauert believes that it was “regrettable” to watch the Russian videos that Putin showed during the speech. According to Nauert, the video showed a “nuclear attack on the United States.” Video Mrs. Nauert called her "vile."

Putin himself, the journalist continues, said that his statement was aimed at attracting the attention of America. But he immediately noted that he (Putin) is open for negotiations with the United States. Putin also claims that the new weapons of Russia will render both American and European defense useless.

Thomas Karako, an expert on missile defense from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, believes that Putin’s statements are consistent with the broader “Russian thinking” model on nuclear weapons and Russia's role in the world.

Michaela Dodge, Heritage Foundation’s anti-missile defense expert at Heritage Foundation, said Putin’s statements confirm the Trump administration’s recent review of nuclear policy and concerns about Moscow’s behavior.

According to the Trump administration, Moscow’s actions are fraught with miscalculation, which will lead to an uncontrolled escalation of the conflict in Europe. The review speaks of a Russian doctrine known as “escalating de-escalation”: Moscow may use or threaten to use low-power nuclear weapons in conditions of limited traditional conflict in Europe, hoping that such tactics will force the United States and NATO to “retreat”.

In irony, you can not refuse and Russian. Russians have always been good at joking: the Americans will not lie to you. Just the Americans and addressed a new joke of the Russian Embassy in the United States.

The Russian Embassy in the United States invited American citizens to participate in a competition of names for the newest types of Russian weapons. "Take part in the contest" Name these weapons "announced by Vladimir Putin for a global-range cruise missile, unmanned underwater vehicle and laser weapons," - quotes RIA News" English page of the embassy on Twitter.

Earlier, V. Putin said that the conventional names for the new Russian cruise missile of global range and underwater unmanned system with a nuclear power plant have not yet been selected, and they can be offered on the websites of the Ministry of Defense.

Heather Nauert, Dana White, and Donald Trump himself could arrange a small competition and take part in a Russian competition. Why not? NATO members still have to invent names for their own classification of Russian weapons.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    72 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +16
      5 March 2018 15: 34
      What on the forehead, on the forehead of these Americans, we still won’t become friends, we breathe evenly, we work further.
      1. +8
        5 March 2018 19: 44
        Pentagon to protect the country "completely ready". What's on the forehead, on the forehead of these Americans ...


        Ready, maybe ready, but as Vladimir Vladimirovich said:

        "Equipment and weapons, even the most modern, will sooner or later appear in other armies of the world. This does not bother us at all. We already have it and will be even better.

        MOST IMPORTANT IN OTHER!

        They will not have such people, such officers as our pilot, guard Major Roman Filipov never!"

        And this is a word from the past about our heroes, about our Russian people.

        In blessed Russia, in the spirit of a pious people, the Tsar and the Fatherland are oneas in the family are one parent and their children.

        Develop in Russian soldiers the idea that lives in them that they, sacrificing their life to the Fatherland, sacrifice it to God and be reckoned with the holy host of the martyrs of Christ ...

        The special fate of the Russian people!

        Nothing Napoleons can do where the hand of God works ...

        May the precious blood of heroes not be shed at the foot of the vile European policy».
        From the letters of St. Ignatius Brianchaninova to N.N. Muravyov-Karsky
        1. +1
          5 March 2018 21: 59
          Quote: Alena Frolovna

          ...

          MOST IMPORTANT IN OTHER!

          They will not have such people, such officers as our pilot, guard Major Roman Filipov never!"
          ...


          On February 12, at a meeting with NTV reporters, German Gref said this in a slightly different way. I sincerely hope this is a fake. Although the hope is weak. Knowing his past statements and way of expressing thoughts is very similar to the truth. If our "elite" thinks (and does not hesitate to say so), then this does not please me, and does not add patriotism: https://twitter.com/Inna_spb/status/9687245616331
          36641? S = 09
          Although, I'm wrong. Patriotism has nothing to do with it. The definition of homeland does not include the term "elite".
        2. +1
          6 March 2018 09: 25
          Quote: Alena Frolova


          MOST IMPORTANT IN OTHER

          Nothing Napoleons can do where the hand of God works ...

          May the precious blood of heroes not be shed at the foot of the vile European policy».
          From the letters of St. Ignatius Brianchaninova to N.N. Muravyov-Karsky


          In response, you have an old saying by Khoja Nasreddin: "Hope in Allah, and tie the camel!" laughing
    2. +17
      5 March 2018 15: 37
      Moscow may use or threaten to use low-power nuclear weapons in conditions of limited traditional conflict in Europe

      What's happened
      TRADITIONAL

      conflict?
      This is when Europe once a hundred years going on a trip to Russia and traditionally raking?
      1. +5
        5 March 2018 20: 59
        Now, if Che, this will be the last campaign of Europe to Russia .... just then there will be no Europe.
        1. +4
          5 March 2018 23: 10
          In this case, most likely, unfortunately, there will be no present Russia either !!
          I would not want to ...
    3. +9
      5 March 2018 15: 40
      So it seems that in 2004, in 2007 and in 2015, leaks were made specially for the Americans in Sarmatia, in cruise missiles and in Status-6. Are they really there already? And the video where they kill Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi was apparently entirely humanistic? The United States, by the way, has mastered a new kind of television art called War on-line, featuring CNN's Desert Storm and September 11, 2001 Attack.
      PS I don’t know what they will call our new weapon, although the name "tramp is your America" ​​is obvious, but apparently there will be something like Putin's strike.
      1. +2
        5 March 2018 16: 03
        Quote: Altona

        PS I don’t know what they will call our new weapon, although the name "tramp is your America" ​​is obvious, but apparently there will be something like Putin's strike.

        The Americans, without twitching, are simply upgrading their ICBMs. Do not even chase new to develop. They are quite sure that for today's Armageddon they will have enough of today's means.
        1. +7
          5 March 2018 16: 09
          I thought that until 01.03.2018, Russia was safe ... but no, now it’s definitely safe, now only)))
          By the way, if a missile bypasses all missile defense and has an UNLIMITED range .. why don’t they launch 20 pieces and let them fly over America, they cannot be shot down and they can fly unlimited?)))
          And it is completely incomprehensible ... when these stupid Americans, after watching our cartoons, will already begin to pay tribute ??? How so, we are the strongest in the world, but they do not give up? What then to do ???
          1. 0
            5 March 2018 18: 15
            The Americans have such a missile carrier. On those same nuclear engines. It’s just that their exhaust will make a radioactive desert underneath, otherwise we would have flown here on atomic planes for a long time and traveled on nuclear trains.
            I think that our rockets give a cleaner exhaust, but sadness is still considerable.
            Our military doctrine is unchanged, you just don’t give yourself a hurt, but they flew into tartarara. They then considered themselves invulnerable! And we reduced the engine to a reasonable size, and ...
            1. +1
              6 March 2018 10: 12
              Quote: Mikhail3
              Our military doctrine is unchanged, you just don’t give yourself a hurt, but they flew into tartarara. They then considered themselves invulnerable! And we reduced the engine to a reasonable size, and ...

              Do I understand correctly that all of our nuclear submarines and other means of delivery are zero without a wand, and no one paid attention to them while we spent money on their production? And the second question, did I understand correctly that the Americans were preparing a war against us, they knew that they were not vulnerable, but they waited until we build this rocket ... what would be more interesting? It’s also interesting, you believe that the richest country in the world wants to nullify all its achievements, since a nuclear war will kill the entire world order and the global economy ... and Americans are bored of being the richest and they want to wipe everyone off the ground and stay on alone on your continent? I can not find answers to these questions anywhere ... help?
              1. +1
                6 March 2018 18: 52
                Do you really, without joking, have such a system of views? I do not believe.
                And therefore I will answer you the same way - with questions. Did I understand correctly - spending on "defense" more than all the other countries of the world combined, does the US mean "nothing of the kind"? And also, do I understand correctly - the most colossal mountains of weapons and the greatest wealth are in no way connected with each other?
                Is my understanding true - the United States didn’t cook against anyone, they don’t cook, and at the moment they are not waging a war, and all those who are killed died themselves and are to blame? Are millions of these unfortunates to blame for being weakly armed or not at all?
                And also answer, did I understand correctly - should not improve weapons? Isn’t it interesting? And have you read the latest military doctrine of marvelous work, according to which the US graciously allows itself to use tactical nuclear weapons wherever it pleases? Not looking at what
                Quote: Semen1972
                nuclear war will kill the whole world order

                Ooh-ho ...
                1. 0
                  9 March 2018 03: 44
                  Quote: Mikhail3
                  Did I understand correctly - spending on "defense" more than all the other countries of the world combined, does the US mean "nothing of the kind"?


                  The Russian Federation spends 5,5% on defense only in open sources in relation to the budget, the United States is 2 times less. Americans do not spend money on the defense industry to the detriment of science, education, and health care, unlike the Russian Federation, where everything else was cut for the sake of the military-industrial complex and the army.

                  Quote: Mikhail3
                  And also, do I understand correctly - the most colossal mountains of weapons and the greatest wealth are in no way connected with each other?

                  That's right, their wealth is due to a strong economy, patents, technology, industry, high incomes and so on. But the army and weapons cost money, not bring. How much did the company cost in Iraq, more than a trillion $? But who got the oil, or rather, who was allowed to develop the fields? Russia and China ..
                  1. 0
                    10 March 2018 11: 49
                    Yes, yes, I get it. When we begin to roll out into a thin pancake, we will conduct proportional calculations. It will be a revelation for you, but proportions do not dance when you need to win.
                    And you need to win, because, despite your amazing ideas, the US’s weapons did not grow up by chance, as a by-product of peaceful wealth. The United States is robbing the world, covering up its affairs with its weapons. Because they are so rich. And not thanks to "technology patents." And at the moment they wish to continue the robbery in our pockets. That's why we need our weapons.
                    Excuse me ...
        2. +3
          5 March 2018 16: 37
          Yeah, without twitching, they are laying the budget for a defense of 700 billion dollars. Without twitching. Calmly so ...
          1. +1
            5 March 2018 17: 14
            most goes to the maintenance and updating of the current infrastructure
            the total amount of development is unlikely to reach 100 billion
            1. 0
              12 March 2018 17: 58
              What's the difference?! The Americans have a budget deficit of billions of dollars, and they let almost a billion go on defense. If you want to say that this is called "without straining", then I will not agree with you.
        3. +2
          5 March 2018 21: 01
          hey wait What are you talking about? They expect the current to destroy us, but they themselves live and prosper .., but no, now it doesn’t work out.
        4. +3
          5 March 2018 21: 12
          They are quite sure that for today's Armageddon they will have enough of today's means.


          Oh well. Not at all like that. They would like Armageddon to be not mutual, but only for the Russian Federation (in the future, China). And here again it did not grow together. Exchanging 120 to 120 million oh how they are not satisfied. Of course, now they will sing that they "will be able to answer" that "we have this, even better." Yes they can. Yes there is. What's the point? They can grind their teeth and growl, but they can’t bite them anymore. Greater Russia is not necessary.
          Even more - having stood "on the edge", they will come to the need for negotiations and open control. By an absurd accident, who wants to burn.
          1. +1
            5 March 2018 22: 55
            Quote: dauria
            By an absurd accident, who wants to burn.

            Judging by the actions there is someone: the Baltic States, Poland and the entire NATO belt.
        5. +1
          5 March 2018 22: 44
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          The Americans, without twitching, are simply upgrading their ICBMs.

          So let them sit evenly and quietly and without twitching they will upgrade.
          As for the passage in the new US military concept of protecting his allies, Putin also has something in his message about his allies. So let the American social media sit quietly and directly.
        6. +1
          5 March 2018 23: 12
          For mutual Armagedon, we all have enough for a tenth of all today's means.
          You do not need to upgrade anything for this.
      2. +1
        5 March 2018 20: 38
        Quote: Altona
        Are they really there already?

        Yesterday my wife spoke on this subject. Drew attention to Zhenechka Ssaki and her followers. I carefully listen to the words of my wife. Usually she is right. So remove the question mark there - there is no question.
    4. BAI
      0
      5 March 2018 16: 19
      We are ready to protect our people, no matter what it costs us

      American taxpayers will have to fork out again.
      1. +5
        5 March 2018 16: 35
        Why American? In February, our central bank bought green candy wrappers for 113,7 billion rubles - all the excess profits from the sale of gas. Can you imagine how much it will turn out in a year? Well, if they don’t have enough for new missile systems, we’ll take it next year - let them print!
        1. +1
          5 March 2018 17: 16
          Quote: Galleon
          In February, our central bank bought green candy wrappers for 113,7 billion rubles - all the excess profits from the sale of gas.

          But no one told you that you can’t keep all the money in one basket? And these candy wrappers also bring interest ... and this is better than giving "friends" to girls and yachts, isn’t it?
          1. +5
            5 March 2018 17: 50
            Semyon, how could you give them to your “friends”, nowhere? Maybe health care, so as not to reduce medical care in the countryside? Maybe on the “fast” salary to add? Is there a frigate to complete or to organize vocational education at least some? Everything is so bad that you immediately “give it to your friends” right away, otherwise they will steal it: the next Skolkovo will be built or not - a military scientific center in Anapa - there are not a single military research institute in the country, and there never have been!
            PS And the money turnover brings interest when money makes money, and not when it is deposited with a neighbor. You want to give 1,5% of the income, and borrow yourself at 12%. Kudrinomika, so rastak!
            1. 0
              5 March 2018 17: 56
              Quote: Galleon
              Semyon, how could you give them to your “friends”, nowhere?

              Well, answer your own question, why are friends getting richer and spending less on medicine? Do you close the car when you leave? And why, is it really impossible to trust people? Are we all thieves?
              1. +1
                5 March 2018 18: 00
                Here you have a failure with an example: I do not have an alarm on the machine. I just lock the doors like a normal host. Because the rules say that I must take all measures so that in my absence no one can use my vehicle. And you, if you do not close the car, commit an administrative offense, because in the hands of an attacker, your car can be a means of committing a crime or even a murder weapon.
                Think again carefully about how to object.
                And then, you raised the topic of "friends." I did not count their money, how do I know why they get rich? I'm not their accountant.
            2. +3
              5 March 2018 20: 47
              Quote: Galleon
              Maybe health care, so as not to reduce medical care in the countryside? Maybe on the “fast” salary to add? Is there a frigate to complete or to organize vocational education at least some?

              This is all so troublesome ... I bought treasureris from Uncle Sam and you can talk about “There is no money, but you hold on there” on a TV camera ... Especially since the gatherings on Gaidar were celebrated the other day, I remembered their theory that the market would ruin everything and work for service is superfluous.
            3. 0
              5 March 2018 21: 18
              You in yesterday live illusory. Vocational education did not go away, I myself thought about three years ago that there was none. And this turned out to be wrong. The vocational schools were called colleges, hidden, and saved.
              1. 0
                6 March 2018 08: 46
                Quote: Galina Artamonova
                You in yesterday live illusory.

                Who did you nail so mercilessly to the pillory? Try a specific person to specifically "answer." Following the “quote” button is very useful - it’s immediately clear why you are so ruthless. It will turn out as my answer to you - you do not laugh, but try ...
          2. +1
            6 March 2018 00: 12
            Quote: Semen1972
            And these candy wrappers also bring interest ..

            Sound the number .. And then remember at what percentage we take loans from Western banks .. It’s for this difference that our elite allow
            Quote: Semen1972
            to give “friends” to girls and yachts,
          3. +1
            6 March 2018 16: 33
            Semen, money must work inside the country - factory factories, etc ...
    5. +1
      5 March 2018 17: 47
      Quote: Aron Zaavi
      The Americans, without twitching, are simply upgrading their ICBMs. Do not even chase new to develop. They are quite sure that for today's Armageddon they will have enough of today's means.

      ---------------------------
      Aron, I know, and they also have hypersonic means. Maybe a little lower and a little poorer than ours, but there is ... With Mach numbers 5-10 ...
      1. 0
        16 March 2018 08: 59
        this is not the case. Americans are in no hurry, because few people have any money for development.
        why rush and splurge if you have enough of what is already there?
        therefore, doubly annoying the Russian Federation - it creates new weapons many times cheaper.
    6. +2
      5 March 2018 17: 49
      Quote: Semen1972
      But no one told you that you can’t keep all the money in one basket? And these candy wrappers also bring interest ... and this is better than giving "friends" to girls and yachts, isn’t it?

      ----------------------------
      Interest there is so-so, from the reboot of the Russian economy you can get much more, at least the same desired 7% of annual growth.
      1. 0
        5 March 2018 20: 50
        Quote: Altona
        from rebooting the Russian economy you can get much more

        This is troublesome.
    7. +1
      5 March 2018 17: 51
      And the measures do not know how to react to them. Either a divorce, or really Russia has this ... lol USSR could not stand the race, whether SGA wink
      1. +2
        5 March 2018 18: 00
        Quote: GIGAN
        And the measures do not know how to react to them. Either a divorce, or really Russia has this ...

        Do you know how to react? You got divorced, because before the election you can flog nonsense or really we have a priest in all the technologies and we buy them, and then some geniuses got together right away. And where are the achievements for people, since we have such talents ... Well, you can touch and touch. And the Americans are not wondering, they have special services and they all know about them for a long time ... At least the world has not changed, and in the networks bikes already go in super toon weapons ...
        1. +2
          5 March 2018 20: 50
          Quote: Semen1972
          Do you know how to react? You got divorced, because before the election you can flog nonsense or really we have a priest in all the technologies and we buy them, and then some geniuses got together right away.

          Well, Saman, you are clearly exaggerating the capabilities of the special services of the Amers, while clearly reducing the importance of our military-industrial complex. To breed at this level is a bad form. States themselves print money themselves, and Russia earns, this is the difference in costs. It will be possible to touch and see not in cartoon mode when secrecy is removed from the weapon. About caliber, even tales did not go, and after application, except for "damn it," couch experts could not say anything. Look more optimistically at the future! drinks
          1. 0
            6 March 2018 11: 38
            Quote: businessv
            Look more optimistically at the future! drinks

            Yes, I am very optimistic !! Now, when nothing threatens us, Vladimir Vladimirovich will fully take care of the country! We will provide everyone with housing, pensioners worthy pensions, preference enterprises, we will eradicate corruption, and we will raise science to the skies !!! Now, nothing prevents us from doing this !!! I can only cry ... I Lived to this time .. and the glory of GDP !!! Last years he lived in fear that America would destroy us .. and we do not have them ... but the worst is behind !!!
          2. 0
            9 March 2018 04: 04
            Quote: businessv
            States themselves print money themselves, and Russia earns, this is the difference in costs.


            Not tired of the nonsense about the "money themselves print" carry? If it were stupidly printed without being backed up by industry, patents, technologies, domestic demand, services, etc., then $ would have collapsed a long time ago and would not have been the most stable currency. The Americans just make money, develop the economy, and Russia has slid completely dependent on oil prices, like never before in history. Earn for example the Chinese in Russia, taking out a penny forest from the taiga and making cheap furniture.
            1. 0
              April 21 2018 00: 00
              Quote: karabas-barabas
              Not tired of the nonsense about the "money themselves print" carry? If it were stupidly printed without being backed up by industry, patents, technologies, domestic demand, services, etc., then $ would have collapsed a long time ago and would not have been the most stable currency.

              Uh-uh, yes dear, you are not at all familiar with macroeconomics, as I can see! The dollar is protected only by the fact that calculations all over the world are carried out in it! It is printed so much that if all countries that own mattress bonds require at least half to pay off, the Americans will be forced to default or offer the option in cash because it is they who cost them nothing! No, they cost 0,3% of the amount released! hi Learn the materiel! Before you want to answer, explain why the mattress has 21 trillion debt! If you can’t, don’t answer at all!
        2. 0
          5 March 2018 20: 55
          Quote: Semen1972
          And where are the achievements for people

          In the country, capitalism. According to Marx's theory, people are paid the price of labor.
          Quote: Semen1972
          since we have such talents ..

          They also pay for talents according to Marx theory. And we can even calculate their income by looking at the ceiling. Counting someone else's money is so exciting ...
          1. 0
            5 March 2018 21: 31
            Quote: 97110
            In the country, capitalism.

            Capitalism? In which country is capitalism?
            1. 0
              6 March 2018 08: 58
              Quote: wer2
              In which country is capitalism?

              Is communism already built in your cottage? Congratulations. This state regularly confirms to me that it has capitalism. Through organizations specially created for working with citizens and stateless persons such as the RF PF and enterprises such as Gorgaz, Energosbyt, Vodokanal. Fate regretted, saved her from close acquaintance with the Criminal Code and life in general in MKD.
              1. 0
                6 March 2018 09: 20
                Quote: 97110
                This state regularly confirms to me that it has capitalism. Through organizations specially created for working with citizens and stateless persons such as the RF PF and enterprises such as Gorgaz, Energosbyt, Vodokanal.

                Buy yourself a book on political economy. And read it.
                It will be written there that OEF succeed each other sequentially. With the development of society and maturation (in the minds of members of this society), the prerequisites for changing the OEF.
                But it is not written about the abrupt development of society, leaping over formations. Because there is no such development, society is developing gradually.
                And it is degrading (movement is possible in both directions), too, gradually. Moreover, unfortunately, it is degrading faster than it is developing.
                The slaveholding system of management in the USSR (it was based on a pseudo-religious, sectarian type, theocratic basis and had its own name "socialism") was last canceled only 26 years ago. The next OEF after the slaveholding according to political economy is feudal. And 26 years is too little for the development of society, sufficient for the transition to the next, capitalist OEF. For this, the society still has to mature. Roads still have to.
                1. 0
                  6 March 2018 10: 54
                  Quote: wer2
                  Roads still have to.

                  Grow already in English. So your heap in the USSR will be even higher and stinker.
                  1. 0
                    6 March 2018 13: 24
                    Quote: 97110
                    So your heap in the USSR will be even higher and stinker.

                    I wanted to at least help you with something. But the wise woman, the old woman Shapoklyak, was right. "Who helps people, he spends time in vain."
    8. +1
      5 March 2018 18: 10
      In general, Putin blundered about it, the special services already know everything, the US has a huge military budget, and it will be even bigger. It’s not difficult for the Americans to print dollars, plus rich European countries go to the US allies, but we don’t have allies, the post-Soviet the poverty that pulls money from Russia does not count
      1. +1
        5 March 2018 21: 00
        Quote: Yak28
        It’s not difficult for Americans to print dollars,

        Ooh, economists are hooked up ...
        Quote: Yak28
        post-Soviet poverty which
        He thinks that the Americans will immediately roll off the money to them, and the EU will roll away, and the whole world will roll off a whole bag for betraying Russia and selling it now ...
      2. 0
        6 March 2018 11: 40
        Quote: Yak28
        It’s not difficult for Americans to print dollars

        We also have a printing press, forgot ??
    9. 0
      5 March 2018 20: 10
      Spend more money :) Public debt should grow :))
      1. 0
        5 March 2018 21: 46
        That's just nobody will ask a debt from them
    10. +1
      5 March 2018 21: 28
      A Negro with a surname - White (White), who is it that joked ???
      1. 0
        6 March 2018 09: 03
        Quote: nnz226
        A Negro with a surname - White (White), who is it that joked ???

        Was dad white? Or the owner of a humorous ancestor ...
    11. 0
      5 March 2018 22: 21
      Everything is lost!
    12. 0
      5 March 2018 22: 51
      Why should they worry? we don’t attack them, and since we are strong, this gives them the right to ask for money
    13. +2
      5 March 2018 23: 08
      According to a spokeswoman for the US military, Dana White, the Pentagon is “fully prepared” to defend the country.
      Well, they have this one ... uh ... how is it? ... oh Batman!
    14. 0
      6 March 2018 00: 05
      YouTube is full of American news channels. Under it are several thousand comments.
      See what the Americans are writing.
      Most are not hiding proud that Putin stopped the 3rd world. Proud of Putin.

      So ...
      1. 0
        6 March 2018 11: 53
        Quote: gladcu2
        Most are not hiding proud that Putin stopped the 3 world

        Stopped already? Hooray!!!! I just was at work that day while she was walking .. and I missed everything .. Well now, let's deal with the economy tightly ... or is it necessary to defeat someone else?)))
    15. +2
      6 March 2018 00: 23
      The United States considered (PR) itself invulnerable. The whole world was convinced of this. Their "exclusivity" is based on this fake, political and economic influence. Russia and Putin have shown that this is a bluff! But so far only in computer graphics. It is necessary to shoot the Sarmatian from Plesetsk to the Kamchatka training ground through the South Pole, with maneuvers over the Pacific Ocean. For the greater sadness of the Atlantists.
      1. 0
        6 March 2018 11: 55
        Quote: Mikhail Zubkov
        The United States considered (PR) itself invulnerable. The whole world was convinced of this. Their "exclusivity" is based on this fake, political and economic influence.

        And what will happen if they still want to destroy Russia? Yes, at the cost of our lives, but this is a matter of principle, as they say .. Are we able to repel their aggression? And if not ... then it turns out that nobody will let us build a great Russia, as soon as we get off our knees again, will they simply destroy us? And what are we ... all going to die ????
        1. 0
          6 March 2018 13: 26
          Quote: Semen1972
          And what will happen if they still want to destroy Russia?

          What for?
    16. 0
      6 March 2018 08: 31
      The names in the NATO classification suggest themselves:
      underwater strategic drone - nukebay
      strategic intercontinental cr - harbinger
      combat laser system - sundog
      Well, it’s unlikely that Satan will surpass, I’m afraid that NATO analysts will have a headache to think of a name, who knew that it was possible to come up with something more fun, only the Judgment of God would be worse than Unclean, nemesis - that would be the most.
    17. 0
      6 March 2018 09: 29
      Quote: BLOND
      Moscow may use or threaten to use low-power nuclear weapons in conditions of limited traditional conflict in Europe

      What's happened
      TRADITIONAL

      conflict?
      This is when Europe once a hundred years going on a trip to Russia and traditionally raking?


      How, again, these captured Romanians will pinch chickens? Yes, how much can you ?! lol
    18. 0
      7 March 2018 14: 17
      destabilize and destroy. Consonant, but not unique.
    19. 0
      8 March 2018 06: 40
      Khrushchev was politically a Pole; he was a Pole and a Russophobe by nation. But he went through all fronts, he was a real military general, politically he was a bastard, curvy, and at the same time, his military experience did not disappear. He simply followed the opinion of the General Staff - the General Staff believed that the Americans delivered the nuclear missiles delivered in Turkey - they “threatened” - he followed the opinion that he began to carry these “water pipes” to Cuba throughout the USSR fishing fleet. Americans do not understand another language - they go until they are stopped. Do they lie when “good wishes” stopped them, so the threat to their existence is the most effective lever to talk to them - they don’t understand another language. They are now confident that the Russian Federation will never deal with the destruction of this beautiful planet, called nuclear war - this is their conviction. That the RF will never apply this. Khrushchev needed energetic actions to convince them - then they started talking like people. Today, threats do not intimidate anyone - they are convinced that Putin will not do this - one mistake in the calculations, during the exercises, the demolished city in the USA will put these snickering whores in their place.
    20. 0
      8 March 2018 22: 03
      I propose to name the laser complex "SCALPEL", because it is like a medical scalpel will cut the inside of the US and NATO missiles.
    21. 0
      9 March 2018 03: 50
      Quote: karabas-barabas
      Russia and China ..

      UUUUU agent of the State Department) Romka (Jack Golovan) hangs up with a hangover maybe asked you to answer, so you’re drumming Karabas) you won’t get a fint - haven’t you watched cartoons of GDP? (scary, already scary)

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"