Military Review

Spacing the first. Feel sick!

88
Axiom 1: The strength of the people in unity.
Axiom 2: Truth is not born in a dispute - it was fools who invented it. And truth is born in agreement. Because everyone agrees with her.

Axiom 3: "Trivial substance" always pops up.

There are a lot of things that have long required spacing. It is the separation, and not restrained criticism. Spacing because many things in the information space are not only fed up, but already fed up.



For, let's say, the “seeds” we refer to a quote from one of the author’s books, where a similar situation was considered a few years ago, but nothing has changed since then.

"While our party and ideological leaders on numerous and fruitless talk shows argue about which part of the Galaxy is the Metropolis, Zet, of course, not without the help of his Patron, has long understood1 man is different from any other. Without this understanding, it is impossible to prepare and carry out a velvet revolution.

The cartridge explained the essence of the question like this. When a person is standing with his mouth open, there are a lot of hunters stuffing crap there. The reaction of people to this is different. Some spit out shit right away. Others - when gorged to nausea. Grew up will swallow shit until, finally, chokes "
[1].

Here you need to make the necessary note. From the experience of journalistic activities, the author realized that not all readers grasp black humor on the fly. There was a case when a well-known journalist in a very reputable magazine “smashed” one of the author’s books, taking black humor at face value. Therefore, hereinafter, black humor, of course, in the author’s understanding, will be italicized in the text.

So, on all central television channels, the main content is political talk shows. The main task of all these programs is his Majesty Rating. Rating because only it is the main criterion for the cost of broadcast advertising. In other words, the income of business owners depends on advertising revenue.

How to reach the Big Rating? It is necessary to involve as many people as possible in an argument. It does not matter what the dispute is about, if only not about the total impoverishment of the nation and the reasons for such a shameful phenomenon. It’s stupid because it turns out in front of the rest of the world, when poor people and losers live on the richest territory of the planet.

For the subject of the dispute on most talk shows, and we have a lot of people interested in politics (sociologists suggested here, because they were well paid), the ill-fated Ukraine was chosen. This topic has been crumpled for more than one year, and everything is rolling, the rating is kept at a high level.

Why it happens? Why are empty broadcasts attracted the attention of the audience? And this is technology.

"Time will tell". Moderators: Artyom Sheinin, Ekaterina Strizhenova and Anatoly Kuzichev

This talk show is conducted by two, or even three specialists.



One piece of paper reads a question to the “expert” present (who invented such “experts”?). He reads quickly, the question is confused and includes several mutually exclusive theses. So that the “expert” does not even think to say anything, he is interrupted as soon as he begins to answer, asking another question. But when he begins to respond to a new one, Artyom says: “Why I ask this question ...” - and begins to explain in a complicated way why he sets it.

He interrupts not only the leader, Ekaterina also interrupts, I suppose that the program director gives the command to join the “battle” in her ear through “Walkie-Toki”.

Therefore, almost always she asks the question out of place.

However, the “experts”, by the way, are well-paid, have become skilled and stress-resistant. They scream with all their might, trying to answer. But, at this time, already from a different angle comes the heart-rending cry of the second "expert", allegedly having the opposite opinion. He was already obligingly offered a microphone to his mouth (no, not yet a spoon). A third voice comes in from the third corner at that time, they also brought a microphone to his mouth, which was open, as expressed in the army “for the width of the butt”. All this "action" is regularly, at the command of the prompter, interrupted by stormy and prolonged applause of maximum volume. At the same time, presenters are actively troll speakers, and at the same time 3-5 people can speak.

The sound engineer vigilantly ensures that the volume of each of them is the same, so that the viewer doesn’t make out anything - suddenly there will be something clever or taboo. Apparently, “experts” are selected by the criterion of loudness of voice, and not by competence..

When the cries reach the apogee, the presenter, with a smile, utters the magic phrase - “advertising on the first channel”, and everyone stops. Therefore, you will not hear the answers to the questions asked by the moderator.

As a rule, advertising begins with a video about a means for bloating. Probably, someone decided that as a result of the “growth of the economy”, the inhabitants of the country swelled up their stomachs from gluttony under the conditions of “reduced inflation” and “income growth” and they would immediately run to pharmacies to buy cherished capsules with a miracle cure from “economic growth”.

It is possible that economic growth exists. After all, it can even be justified by the law of conservation, which the thinkers of ancient Greece, India, and other nations adhered to. For example, Empedocles believed that nothing could come from nothing and nothing could be destroyed. The same idea was expressed by Democritus. According to Aristotle, matter does not come from nothing, is not subject to multiplication or reduction, does not create and does not disappear, but only changes. Ideas about the eternity of matter are set forth in Lucretius Cara in his famous work "On the Nature of Things". The same ideas underlie all atomistic teachings (Democritus, Epicurus, Lucretius Kar, Gassendi, Lomonosov, Dalton) [2]. And even the leader of the world proletariat, whose mummy smokes the sky in the very heart of the capital of the destroyed Russian empire, supported these postulates as confirmation of the theory of materialism.

Therefore, domestic experts from the economy have guessed that due to the emptying of the pockets of the inhabitants, their contents should “spill over” somewhere, and it is more correct to assume that it is “growing” in the “economy” and, therefore, “growing”. Can anyone refute the conservation law?

Every broadcast of this talk show ends with the leading man’s words: “Time will show,” confirming the senselessness of this action. After all, not summarized the discussion and it was not, no conclusions drawn from the opinions of experts, but no one gave them the words inserted into the "discussion", and no predictions are given about possible scenarios for the development of the situation in the long-suffering Ukraine, perhaps no one sanctioned the prediction of the political situation, although talk shows and political.

When this article was ready, a message from the President to the Federal Assembly was made. It seems that the Leader of the Nation is finally ready to undertake the overhaul of our common home.

At the same time he (for the first time in stories messages) on videos showed how he “kick ass” to all our “partners”, if that. And in an advertising break, the means for bloating disappeared. Did they roll on the recommendation of our Government?

60 minutes. Moderators: Olga Skabeeva and Evgeny Popov



This talk show comes out in a different format, more European. Here, the experts lead the discussion standing, they are wearing microphones, so they can enter into the discussion at any moment that is most uncomfortable for the opponent.

Intelligent presenters here will not beat the talk show participants. Here, slender and elegant Eugene with fashionably dressed and brightly made-up Olga is pacing on the sex projection screen. That's right, do not be like alien currents of asexual society.

As a rule, well-known politicians and opponents from among the liberal group of theorists of Russian liberalism are invited. Participants of the action are behind the barriers located against each other. Of course, behind one barrier there are supporters of the existing state of affairs, behind the opposite - its critics. To ensure that the experts do not have the opportunity to substantiate their judgment in a rigid framework (60 minutes minus commercial breaks), Olga Skabeeva asks a question for a very long time, explaining in detail why she sets it, and often answers the same verbally to it.

Somewhere overseas political analysts who came in contact with the studio via video link have disappeared. Probably, "cut" their fees for other purposes.

Those who come forward because of the first barrier say what they want and how much they want. Those who are trying to object to something because of the second barrier are godlessly troll and stopped at the most interesting place - advertising, after all.

Oddly enough, here are the same commercials about bloating.

The state channel, so everything is thought out to the smallest detail. For example, the Olympic functionaries tried to humiliate the Russian people, took away the state flag. Then they sent our brave leader to the front of the information front, who skillfully diluted the Olympic the news rather bored with the topic of Ukraine - during its reports, Ukrainian "political scientists" thoughtfully chewed their lips.

She climbed all the holes of Pyong Chkhan, pulled out all our heroes and reputable sports reporters who aired the debate about the injustices that the Olympic movement had fallen into.

And even by some miracle, she broke into the men's (!) Dressing room of our hockey squad.

Worthy of generous rewards from the eternal sponsors of the national sport!

Despite these drawbacks, this talk show can be considered more advanced. It is for intellectually more refined natures, i.e. closes another segment of the audience. Here, almost all participants at the end of the release are given 30 seconds to summarize or forecast the development of the situation. But here, advertising occupies a significant part of the program.

This is constantly confirmed by the words of the presenter after the next commercial break: “This is sixty minutes, we have only a short time left ...”

Sometimes the viewer may get lucky - in the talk show there will not be hateful Ukrainian “political analysts” who, like the church ponomare, chant the same thing year after year, “but it's still there”. This happens when discussing the affairs of the fatherland. Sometimes here and he would have entered the discussion.

Just what's the point of these discussions. Nobody listens to them, and any discussion ends with a single result - “bloating”. Do not believe? See for yourself.

Meeting point. Moderators: Olga Belova and Andrey Norkin



Here we find ourselves in an atmosphere of refined intelligence, the wit of leading, first of all, Andrei Vladimirovich and sober opinions mixed with bestial Russophobia. Which, however, flows through the channels of all television companies. The presenters mainly give their opinions to the experts and inhibit only those who go beyond the decorum or the “general line” of the talk show.

Strange as it may seem, the theme of Ukraine also prevails here. On the benches of the cozy amphitheater there are the same experts wandering from one show to another from the different corners of the world - from Ukraine, brotherly Poland, as well as the overseas metropolis. Sometimes the studio is visited by guests from the Baltic states, which are entrusted to express the official opinion of the European Union. The discussion in a rigid framework, but with “soft” methods, is supported by a smiling presenter, who is bewildering the thought of the speakers with his subtle humor.

In talk shows there is, unlike most similar programs, logic and clarity regarding the behavior of the presenters. And each program ends with a witty Jewish anecdote, which tells Norkin.

Very often one of the American experts, who has deeply studied Russian, uses Russian sayings in his speeches, although often he is trapped. For example, Norkin asks:
- Why did two American warships enter the Black Sea?
- “That's what pike is in the sea, so that the crucian doesn’t sleep,” the American found.
But then the discussion took an unexpected turn. Norkin asked:
- Do you know another Russian saying - “For every cunning f * ny there is a threaded bolt”? However, the expert did not let up, he probably did not know about “f * n with a corner” and resourcefully suggested his own solution to the problem with the “bolt”, and says:
- And we have a nut on the bolt! - and exhaled victoriously.
It was not there. In our resourcefulness you will not overdo it.
- Do you know that on American nuts the thread to our bolts does not fit? - asked the presenter, what morally “finished off” the arguments of the American side.
This is the way to conduct a discussion on all other channels!

This program can be viewed. But once. Therefore, it is best to turn on NTV a minute before 16 hours, to hear a good joke

It makes no sense to distribute other similar talk shows - they are also in the studio of Vladimir Solovyov and Roman Babayan, and even on Zvezda TV channel. It seems that the editors of these channels do not know what to do with the air in order to squeeze the highest rating possible and earn the maximum revenue from the sale of advertising. After all, only this goal is pursued by the leadership of the channels. This is evidenced by their entire information policy.

Therefore, now young families have less and less TV in the apartment. People go online. Than buying an expensive TV, even if it is “Smart”, it is better to buy a new model of a smartphone, so argues a new generation alien to the theme of Ukraine, who does not understand this frenzied studio hustle and less and less trust in TV.

We lose people by letting them in ourselves and pushing them on the Internet. We divide people. Not only in the studio, where we make them enemies. Along with the focus group, supporters of various experts are also divided. So, we divide our people, to put it mildly, ill-conceived, information policy, at the center of which monetary benefit is put. Is this the meaning of television?

In fairness, it is worth noting that on the eve of the speech of the President of the country V.V. Putin, with an annual message to the Federal Assembly, all talk shows suspiciously unanimously lowered the degree of hostility in their studios. So, they still understand what they usually do?

Accepting the position of the editors of the TV channels, we will also draw up our “rating” of the talk shows posted here.
In third place, "Time will tell" for the "impeccable" trolling studio and the loudest sounds from the soundproof studio.
On the second place "60 minutes" for the impeccable image and bold breakthrough charming leading to the men's locker room.
In the first place is the “Meeting Place” for the intelligent management of the audience and funny jokes at the end of the show.
The author is expecting from the editorial board his share of the advertising revenue for raising the NTV rating.2
.

Returning to the axioms listed at the beginning of the article, we note.
Firstly, the unity of the nation is undermined by an ill-conceived information policy regarding political talk shows where society is divided, partly turning into enmity between the disputing groups.
Secondly, references to democratic pluralism of opinions are unfounded if you are not capable of developing a consolidated opinion in such talk shows, that is, at least approaching the Truth. And, therefore, such shows are not of public benefit, they only bring the growth of the notorious rating for making money on the evils of people.
Thirdly, remember the fundamental proverb of the people - someday you yourself may find yourself in an “unpleasant situation”.

So take abdominal hemorrhaging medications that you advertise so that one day you don’t».

1So in the original source, see http://e-luxe.info/?page_id=369.
2See the meaning of italics at the beginning of the article.

Sources:
1. Velvet Wars. Episode IV: Orange Agent, - http://e-luxe.info/?page_id=369.
2. The laws of conservation in classical physics, http://physiclib.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000018/st018.shtml.
Author:
88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Same lech
    Same lech 2 March 2018 06: 35
    +6
    Axiom 2: Truth is not born of controversy - fools came up with this. And Truth is born in harmony. Because everyone agrees with her.


    It’s wrong ... if only those who are willing to leave democratic bombs on the heads of democratic bombs will remain ... here, as they say, it is necessary to properly argue with the enforcement of peace. smile
    And most importantly ... don’t look before the dinners and the zombies at night ... otherwise you will become like zombies from UKRAINE and POLAND.
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 2 March 2018 06: 54
      +17
      I will support. To come to an agreement, you just need to argue first. the parties usually have a different understanding of the solution to the issue.
      Regarding political talk shows, I completely agree with the author. The most disgusting "Time will tell." With Catherine, as the interior of the studio and competent, but not giving the floor to the leading.
      1. Uncle lee
        Uncle lee 2 March 2018 07: 16
        +13
        I used to watch TV shows, now I'm hooked on talk shows! What can smart be taken out of there? This is SHOW !!!
        Show (eng.show - show, performance) - an event of an entertaining nature, shown to the public and having a staged character:
        1. Cube123
          Cube123 2 March 2018 07: 42
          +15
          Quote: Uncle Lee
          What can smart be taken out of there?

          His task is not to teach something, but to collect money from advertisers who pay for this, so to speak, action.

          A good phrase once came across: "Dumb comedies are not created by dumb authors, they are created for dumb spectators!"
          1. twviewer
            twviewer 2 March 2018 09: 31
            +7
            Now, instead of a TV set, the author has a textbook on logic that would know that there is an axiom, that truth, and that opinion, and that he has mixed his substance and walls of VO spoiled. And this is analytics laughing
            And considering your thesis
            Quote: Cube123
            "Dumb comedies are not created by dumb authors, they are created for dumb spectators!"
            we are being held here for idiots crying
            1. Cube123
              Cube123 2 March 2018 09: 45
              +6
              Quote: twviewer
              we are being held here for idiots crying

              Not at all. In any society there is a layer of not very smart, or not very educated people. They also need chewing gum for their brains. A smart person in most cases would prefer a good book. This is a matter of choice. No need to smear everyone in one world smile

              Regarding the author of the article, I agree with your assessment. A lot of things distorted me there too. The level is so low that I didn’t even want to comment.
          2. antivirus
            antivirus 4 March 2018 12: 47
            +2
            and already 10 years ago it was said-- smart people do not read gloss, they publish it
        2. novel66
          novel66 2 March 2018 07: 48
          +14
          Hello! hi and why the heck do they watch? here I am somehow getting around request
          1. SPACE
            SPACE 2 March 2018 09: 06
            +4
            Quote: novel xnumx
            hello! and why the heck do they watch? here I am somehow getting around

            And why the heck then read Aftara of this article and your comment, and actually mine too?
            Is the author and you something very different from these talk shows? All the same, just too much stupid self-conceit, over the edge fool
            Z.Y. Judgment is not sober ...
            1. ans
              ans 5 March 2018 00: 36
              0
              Quote: SPACE
              Is the author and you something very different from these talk shows? All the same, just too much stupid self-conceit, over the edge
              Z.Y. Judgment is not sober ...

              Already what a bold self-criticism !!!! Respect .... I also do not watch talk shows, because because of the show I have diarrhea! tongue
        3. Semen1972
          Semen1972 2 March 2018 15: 07
          +6
          Quote: Uncle Lee
          This is SHOW !!!

          The trouble is that many of these shows are taken for good measure. People believe in stars under hypnosis, and then in ties ..))) Who is older, for them this is not a show, but a debate honest and fair - with rotten Americans and Ukrainians)) The remaining 15-20% is a show ... true very wretched show, repeating and not at all funny ..
      2. Cube123
        Cube123 2 March 2018 07: 38
        +2
        Quote: rotmistr60
        I will support. To come to an agreement, you just need to argue first. the parties usually have a different understanding of the solution to the issue.

        The absence of a dispute usually leads to the position: “there are two opinions, mine and wrong” smile
      3. German Titov
        German Titov 2 March 2018 08: 04
        +6
        From the series, at least it was useful, - "Eternal Call", "State Border", etc.
        1. Cube123
          Cube123 2 March 2018 08: 10
          +3
          Quote: German Titov
          From the series, at least it was useful, - "Eternal Call", "State Border", etc.

          Those series were created by State. order and paid by the State. And these exist due to commercial breaks.
          1. Andrey Yuryevich
            Andrey Yuryevich 2 March 2018 09: 00
            +6
            Spacing the first. Feel sick!
            and this is just a political show ... and to add the rest of Malakhov and others, it seems to the country-durdom ...
    2. BAI
      BAI 2 March 2018 09: 47
      +7
      Truth is born in dispute. Buried there. - Here is the full text of the phrase.
    3. Captain45
      Captain45 2 March 2018 09: 49
      +4
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Wrong ... if dissenting to pour democratic bombs on the heads only consonants will remain ... here, as they say, it is necessary to properly argue with enforcement of peace. smile

      Classical: “A kind word and a revolver in addition act more convincingly than just a kind word” Al Capone. This was demonstrated by the President yesterday, he says "guys, let's live in peace" and at the same time he demonstrates a number of new weapons. laughing
  2. Snail N9
    Snail N9 2 March 2018 07: 06
    +15
    Is the author so keen on the zombie box? I don’t watch “talk shows” at all, precisely because of the “shows”, and also the so-called “news”, which transmit the same “permitted” information on all channels. If I need information on a particular issue, "I go" to the "Internet" - I read various sources there, somehow ...
    1. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 2 March 2018 07: 29
      +12
      Quote: Snail N9
      I don’t watch talk shows at all

      You are one of the few. thinking with your own head. But the main "herd" still thinks like a herd. And all talk shows are focused on him. hi
      1. SPACE
        SPACE 2 March 2018 08: 19
        +9
        Quote: Snail N9
        If I need information on this or that issue, "I go" to the "Internet" - I read various sources there,

        Information is actually transmitted in different ways, and the Internet is only one of the varieties, like grandmothers on shops, TV, radio, print media and their own language and are not something special or unique, all the more unconditionally true, the Internet is a library in the trash so there’s enough shit there too. Just progress does not stand still, so such a variety of everything, choose, watch and listen to what you want. They used to hide the truth or replace it with a lie, now they camouflage it.
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        You are one of the few. thinking with your own head

        Think you think so? laughing well, everyone thinks what the main question is what? One head with brains, while others have a pot instead of a head, and soup instead of brains fool and it’s not difficult to guess from the stench of some comments what kind of infection from the Internet some shove into their mouths.
      2. Varyag_0711
        Varyag_0711 2 March 2018 09: 22
        +13
        Ingvar 72 Today, 07:29 ↑ New
        You are one of the few. thinking with your own head.
        A cuckoo praises a rooster for praising a cuckoo ... laughing
        That is, in your opinion, only those who take a fierce anti-Russian and anti-Putin position can think with their heads, right ?! Stirlitz has never been so close to failure ... bully laughing
        1. Ingvar 72
          Ingvar 72 3 March 2018 07: 35
          +2
          Quote: Varyag_0711
          That is, in your opinion, only those who take a fierce anti-Russian and anti-Putin position can think with their heads, right?

          Instead of labeling you, you'd better read Kara-Murza's "Manipulation of Consciousness." Then learn to understand a little in that stream of information homn that is poured onto the heads of the audience of the media. And the anti-Putin position does not need to be equated with an anti-Russian, cheap trick. The Putin government (do you need to list by name?) Does Russia much more harm under the beautiful slogans of stability than good. hi
          1. Senior manager
            Senior manager 6 March 2018 15: 55
            0
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Then learn to understand a little in that stream of information homn that is poured onto the head of the viewer

            Sorry, are you friends with your head? Information and informational homo are different concepts, completely. For example, I prefer to search for information, instead of understanding the flow .... And therefore, your emotional passage is completely incomprehensible. The tone of your statements speaks of some kind of superiority, are you probably one of these exceptional ones?
            And the article is actually correctly reflecting the degree of decline of our talk shows, and most programs do not greatly respect their audience. We switched to Amer’s technology: do not pull the viewer up, but lower to the level of a stool. IMHO.
            1. Ingvar 72
              Ingvar 72 6 March 2018 17: 35
              0
              Quote: St. Propulsion
              instead of being fluent

              The bulk still does not even understand the flow. And if you understand the obvious things
              Quote: St. Propulsion
              We switched to Amer’s technology: do not pull the viewer up, but lower to the level of a stool. IMHO.

              you must know this. Then I do not understand your taunts.
      3. Semen1972
        Semen1972 2 March 2018 16: 04
        +1
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        But the main "herd" still thinks like a herd. And all talk shows are focused on him. hi

        And if you look what inspire this herd? It turns out you question everything that the current policy of the country stands on? And this is you whipping against Scrap !!! The world is exactly the same as it is presented in these shows and that's it ... only liberals and those to whom the government pays do not agree !!
    2. marline
      marline 2 March 2018 12: 08
      +7
      Quote: Snail N9
      I don’t watch “talk shows” at all, precisely because of the “shows”, and also the so-called “news”, which transmit the same “permitted” information on all channels. If I need information on a particular issue, "I go" to the "Internet" - I read various sources there, somehow ...

      Not ordinary, as a rule, loves to emphasize that it does not under any circumstances watch the “zombie-box”, and, even more so, somehow the popular channel. Of course, he considers himself a very informed creature, drawing his "exceptional" information from the network, well, or from a non-worthy radio Yahu-Moscow. And, of course, he immediately seeks to stigmatize everyone, accusing him of bydlism, if it suddenly turns out that someone is looking at this box.
  3. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 2 March 2018 07: 43
    +2
    Do you know another Russian proverb - "For every tricky f * ck there is a bolt with a thread"?

    that's the whole level of our TV, only brains are good for rubbish.
    1. marline
      marline 2 March 2018 12: 30
      +4
      Quote: Bulrumeb
      Do you know another Russian proverb - "For every tricky f * ck there is a bolt with a thread"?

      that's the whole level of our TV, only brains are good for rubbish.

      Look not ours, listen to yekha or radio radonezh, no one forbids, no one is against them littering your brains ...
      1. Cube123
        Cube123 2 March 2018 13: 26
        +6
        Quote: merlin
        Look not ours, listen to yekha or radio radonezh, no one forbids, no one is against them littering your brains ...

        It is possible that in vain, which does not prohibit. It is enough to read any textbook on NLP to hear familiar technology in yech. In practice, this is what is used in sects. And a person who daily listens to this station actually comes to preach daily. It’s very hard to break out. Some signs of recovery begin to appear only after two months, after a complete refusal to listen. I watched several acquaintances.
        1. marline
          marline 2 March 2018 14: 10
          +3
          Quote: Cube123
          It is possible that in vain, which does not prohibit.

          I agree, although in our age of information permissiveness it is practically impossible to ban something, they will crawl anyway, but I really want to!
          1. Cube123
            Cube123 2 March 2018 16: 05
            +3
            Quote: merlin
            Quote: Cube123
            It is possible that in vain, which does not prohibit.

            I agree, although in our age of information permissiveness it is practically impossible to ban something, they will crawl anyway, but I really want to!

            Why? There are legal methods. Advertising for cigarettes and alcohol was banned. In the West, for example, the law prohibits the use of children in advertising. The impact on parental instincts is too strong. To punish for unfair advertising, to fine. It's just that this is still very poorly developed here. If, for example, subconscious influence is proven, then what is not a subject for trial?
            1. marline
              marline 2 March 2018 16: 30
              +2
              Quote: Cube123
              If, for example, subconscious influence is proven, then what is not a subject for trial?

              Squealing of course will be, but I agree.
      2. Bulrumeb
        Bulrumeb 2 March 2018 14: 23
        +1
        Look not ours, listen to yohu or radio radonezh

        Yes, I’ll manage somehow without your “valuable” advice. if you like what is shown on our central channels - the flag is in your hands.
        1. marline
          marline 2 March 2018 14: 48
          +3
          Quote: Bulrumeb
          if you like what is shown on our central channels - the flag is in your hands.

          Like - do not like .... I just think it's stupid to limit myself in terms of information. Moreover, all of these “cozy blosiks” with “smart analytics” will never reach the level of information content with TV - financial opportunities are not the same. They simply do not have the money to send a correspondent, say to Syria, for example. So all these “fi” - conversations in favor of the poor, who can only discuss what they reported on TV a couple of days before - which they do. So isn't it better first-hand?
          1. Bulrumeb
            Bulrumeb 2 March 2018 14: 59
            0
            .. I just think it's stupid to limit myself in terms of information

            those. these talk shows about the country 404, as well as the broadcasts where they talk about the celadon Dzhigarkhanyan with foam at the mouth or did Mishulin cheat on your wife useful in terms of information? Well then, I'm sorry that involuntarily hurt you for the living.
            1. marline
              marline 2 March 2018 15: 04
              0
              Quote: Bulrumeb
              Well then, I'm sorry that involuntarily hurt you for the living.

              Come up with something smarter then you can hurt.
              1. Bulrumeb
                Bulrumeb 2 March 2018 15: 19
                0
                I didn’t invite you, I got in with the echoes of matzah and so on, so apply this to yourself, hi
                1. marline
                  marline 2 March 2018 16: 32
                  +1
                  You rave ... hi
  4. inkass_98
    inkass_98 2 March 2018 07: 56
    +6
    Do not look at all the crap on the box, then there will be no urge to write such articles.
    I don’t even know who all these characters are, so painted by the author.
  5. Alex66
    Alex66 2 March 2018 08: 01
    +5
    They are not a show for the search for truth, although they could be useful if people spoke about the real problems of our country: pensions, education, medicine. But who besides the people is interested in this? The elite, with GDP at the head, does not exactly bother these problems they have solved. They study abroad, are treated abroad, they have a pension in Western banks, they just crap here.
    1. marline
      marline 2 March 2018 12: 37
      +3
      Quote: Alex66
      they just crap here.

      I’m embarrassed to ask, do you run across the border for this, or in a neutral zone?
      Quote: Alex66
      They are not a show for the search for truth, although they could be useful if people spoke about the real problems of our country: pensions, education, medicine. But who besides the people is interested in this?

      As recently as yesterday, the president emphasized that he was very interested in these problems.
      Moreover, talk shows dedicated to these issues are also regularly released. Yes, the author of the article is somewhat right - the level of discussion is often extremely low. But problems are coming up.
      Although in general, your desire to cry is understandable. And gain pluses for the "cry Yaroslavna", too.
      1. Alex66
        Alex66 2 March 2018 13: 21
        +1
        Under the word crap I did not have a physiological process. Yes, there are shows on sore topics, but very rarely. Yes, the president is preoccupied with internal problems, as in his first two terms, look at his old speeches. Has something really improved? We are urged to take care of pensions ourselves, education and medicine are not lazy only. On all channels, citizens collect money for the treatment of children. I also understand your desire to not notice problems, maybe in your life they are not. But the USSR collapsed because of such problems. Problems must be solved, and not convinced others that everything is fine, like the marquise.
        1. marline
          marline 2 March 2018 13: 40
          +3
          Quote: Alex66
          Under the word crap I did not have a physiological process.

          This makes me happy.
          Quote: Alex66
          Yes, there are shows on sore topics, but very rarely. Yes, the president is preoccupied with internal problems, as in his first two terms, look at his old speeches.

          So it was necessary to write what is, but not enough.
          Quote: Alex66
          Has something really improved?

          See the statistics. Yesterday, by the way, during a speech by the president, statistics were cited and clearly showed that there are improvements.
          Quote: Alex66
          We are encouraged to take care of pensions ourselves,

          1. Something I did not hear that pensions stopped paying.
          2. Something I don’t remember, that earlier pensions did not depend on where and how a person worked.
          Quote: Alex66
          education and medicine is not lazy just lazy.

          Active does not mean smart. There are real problems in education and medicine, but only a few people really talk about them, and very rarely. Basically, as you rightly noted, everything is limited to pouring a tub of r ... who are happy to eat all sorts of "non-profit".
          Quote: Alex66
          On all channels, citizens collect money for the treatment of children.

          This is called a donation. In addition to collecting money for the treatment of children, they also collect for example humanitarian aid to victims. What are you against? so do not list, no one forces.
          Quote: Alex66
          I also understand your desire to not notice problems, maybe in your life they are not. But because of such the USSR fell apart.

          Do not smack nonsense - it hurts ... the Soviet Union collapsed like you, who wanted 30 varieties of sausages in the store and who made this a problem.
          Quote: Alex66
          Problems must be solved, not convinced by others that everything is fine, like a marquise.

          You have already solved the problem with sausage, maybe enough, let people live.
          And yet yes: "Life has become better, life has become more fun!"
  6. Masya masya
    Masya masya 2 March 2018 08: 13
    +4
    The rating is kept at a high level.

    So, this is eating and judging by the fact that the rating is high, it is eating quite a few people ... and so long as it is consumed, there will be such programs ...
    Turn off the TV box!
    1. Snail N9
      Snail N9 2 March 2018 08: 34
      +4
      I once talked with one gentleman who is involved in MASS MEDIA on a professional basis, and "up there" so he said one "curious thing." Namely, in the early 10s, it was planned how in the USA to remove “broadcast” broadcasting in Russia altogether — that is, reception on an external antenna. We conducted an experiment and it turned out that in "cable" broadcasting and in "digital TV, people creep into" favorite channels "-types of movies, TV shows, travels, nature, animals, etc. and stop watching" zombies "of state broadcasting. Therefore: thought, thought and refused, in any case, as long as the impoverished hegemon and the same pensioners in the dachas continue to watch "wire" broadcasting with state "zombie programs", so to speak, to continue their correct political orientation .. .
      1. marline
        marline 2 March 2018 12: 43
        +3
        Quote: Snail N9
        I once communicated with one gentleman,

        You have a typo, instead of a gentleman - there must be a lady of old age!
      2. Des10
        Des10 2 March 2018 12: 47
        +3
        for a long time and - without any wires - people are watching what they want. The choice is huge and - people - think. And many do not have time to watch staged "courts". And the percentage of TV addicts is constant, but they are a minority.
        If the states are not connected, those whom they like will frown.
    2. Tsoy
      Tsoy 2 March 2018 09: 07
      +4
      Quote: Masya Masya
      So, this is eating and judging by the fact that the rating is high, it is eating quite a few people ... and so long as it is consumed, there will be such programs ...
      Turn off the TV box!


      Unfortunately, for several reasons, TV remains the main source of information. Despite the Internet covering immense, the level of computer literacy is quite low. So piss in the ears will continue as before. But I am glad that fights appeared in these shows. Apparently the rating still began to fall.
    3. marline
      marline 2 March 2018 12: 40
      +4
      Quote: Masya Masya
      Turn off the TV box!

      And go to the wilderness! To the taiga! There are no information resources at all!
      Run until it’s too late, because the "stony Putin" has already promised and the Internet there ...
      1. Masya masya
        Masya masya 2 March 2018 13: 11
        +4
        Quote: merlin
        Run until it’s too late, because the "stony Putin" has already promised and the Internet there ...

        As far as I remember, this promised Dimon- will pop into every toilet ... lol
        1. marline
          marline 2 March 2018 13: 18
          +2
          Quote: Masya Masya
          As far as I remember, this promised Dimon- will pop into every toilet ... lol

          I won’t say anything about Dimon, but Putin promised exactly yesterday.
  7. Sverdlov
    Sverdlov 2 March 2018 08: 47
    +5
    "the unity of the nation is undermined by an ill-conceived information policy"
    This is true. Only more is the unity of the nation undermined by ill-conceived economic policies. Stratification of the nation by 5% of the rich and everyone else including 30% of the poor. Therefore, the correct idea is that people go to the Internet. I observe on myself and others. When (rarely) I watch digital channels immediately after the phrase "and now advertising" I switch the channel.
    And about the spitting of a connoisseur of Empedocles towards Lenin. Well, Ilyich did not destroy the great empire! It was destroyed by inept managers. The same as now. But Russia was saved by the Bolsheviks, led by Lenin. And they created the Great, Mighty Soviet Union.
    Learn history, author -> author -> author. His recent and glorious, and not just Diogenes' philosophy ...
  8. Altona
    Altona 2 March 2018 09: 35
    +7
    My TV turned into a device on which only channels broadcasting movies and TV shows watch. Sometimes I watch the news, such as yesterday. It’s impossible to watch our officialdom, the topics do not change. From one can even classify - the Evil West, the former Sumerian brothers, homicide-man-made explosions and fires. Then a little philistine vulgarity and series from alternative history with a clear crunch of French rolls and women's corsets. Okay, we’re somehow talking here, I'm still on Twitter to discuss topical issues. I looked at yesterday’s message, Putin sent everyone, Americans, to Kuzma’s famous mother, Russians to live up to 80 years with no money in the budget for the programs he announced. A 1,5-fold increase in GDP per capita will probably be achieved by squeezing these souls as sponges for the soul. I already heard that when we wanted to overtake Portugal in terms of GDP and buy whatever we want.
  9. vlad007
    vlad007 2 March 2018 09: 38
    +2
    What kind of unity are we talking about when the difference in incomes of managers and workers even at STATE enterprises (Roscosmos, Rostekh, Rusnano, Rosatom) is outrageous.
    No one is watching everything on TV anymore, many 30 channels and each channel except for talk shows have interesting programs. By the way, 75% of the most interesting things on youtube are TV shows in recordings.
  10. Altona
    Altona 2 March 2018 09: 39
    +4
    Quote: Masya Masya
    So, they eat it and judging by the fact that the rating is high, not a few people are eating ...

    ----------------------------------
    Yes, Armenian cowards began to “eat” something, then the personal life of the collapsed Dzhigarkhanyan was being taken apart, now they switched to Spartak Mishulin’s daughter. The Armenians apparently decided in this way to get what the Jews were taking away from them on other channels. Nothing, soon Nastya Volochkova will return from the Maldives, reveal new twine to them, in all aspects she will show where, when and with whom she came off. Masha Maksakova has not yet pleased her whole mouth. There are still reserves in the vulgarization of ether.
    1. Snail N9
      Snail N9 2 March 2018 10: 32
      +2
      Yes, Armenian cowards began to “eat” something, then the personal life of the collapsed Dzhigarkhanyan was being taken apart, now they switched to Spartak Mishulin’s daughter. The Armenians apparently decided in this way to get what the Jews were taking away from them on other channels. Nothing, soon Nastya Volochkova will return from the Maldives, reveal new twine to them, in all aspects she will show where, when and with whom she came off. Masha Maksakova has not yet pleased her whole mouth. There are still reserves in the vulgarization of ether.


      ABOUT! You are so erudite in “TV filth” that it raises some doubts that you really “ignore” the TV .... hi
  11. Jerk
    Jerk 2 March 2018 09: 58
    +2
    Actually, this is precisely why TV is rapidly losing ratings, and the audience that remains with them needs exactly the same thing - a “people's court”, as the grandmothers on the shops were called. This is not only in the political sense of the show, exactly the same for example in football. Real discussions have long gone online. Together with analytics.
    Is this news?
  12. andrewkor
    andrewkor 2 March 2018 10: 10
    +2
    Ek, you are so serious! But are you already not interested in the problems of Dzhigarkhanyan, Mishulin and other respected people? This is where the nausea lasts for many months, pah !!!
  13. Altona
    Altona 2 March 2018 10: 36
    +2
    Quote: Snail N9
    ABOUT! You are so erudite in “TV filth” that it raises some doubts that you really “ignore” the TV ....

    -----------------------------------
    I can’t ignore parents, every day I go to the apartment and every day on the mother’s TV screen such garbage is visible. Therefore, a little "in the know" what TV feeds us. Or do you think I watch talk shows for hours? While I am there for about 15-20 minutes, I have to get this kind of information with the edge of my ear and the edge of my eye ...
    1. Snail N9
      Snail N9 2 March 2018 10: 39
      +1
      Why "hours" ... so 30-40 minutes ... wink
  14. Valery U.
    Valery U. 2 March 2018 10: 44
    +3
    Such shows have a definite purpose - to fill the gap in the population in the understanding of political processes. And so the level of knowledge for the period of 2000 was almost zero for the majority of the population in this area (I'm talking about the results of the collapse of the USSR). The time has come now to thus tighten our knowledge in political science, so that at least we do not understand that the king’s check on the chessboard does not take place in one move, but is planned for many moves ahead (which you ignorantly looked through). In addition, do not forget, if you do not want to watch domestic political information, the prime time will be filled with another ideology (consumption, betrayal, the cult of a successful citizen, Santa Claus instead of Santa Claus, etc., all this has already been done in the 90s). And the last - there are more than a hundred channels on NTV + and Tricolor - switch and watch what you like, and the same goes on the central political information all day and night. The author of the article clearly works out the money and does not defend his opinion.
  15. Topalek
    Topalek 2 March 2018 11: 13
    +1
    I liked the article. I understand the author, really boiling already. I don’t watch TV for a long time. Because there really is nothing to watch. Absolutely all channels show and speak the same official point of view. These talk shows are such a gross obvious brainwashing, I personally get cracked by them. So insulting for people who take all this at face value. I really personally know those who, for all 100, believe what they are shown. All this is sad.
  16. Anyone
    Anyone 2 March 2018 11: 53
    +1
    Axiom 2: Truth is not born out of argument - fools came up with this. And truth is born in harmony. Because everyone agrees with her.

    1000 years ago, everyone agreed that the Earth was flat. But this is never the truth.
  17. aries2200
    aries2200 2 March 2018 11: 54
    +1
    Yes, this watered-up chatter and advertising-the fooling of the Russian people = total debilitation. the herd is easier to manage the shepherd.
  18. Galleon
    Galleon 2 March 2018 12: 31
    +3
    To the author: well done! They wrote well and interestingly. Do not be offended by stupid criticism, remember smart. Although I don’t look at the box, thanks for the article!
  19. Citizen 90
    Citizen 90 2 March 2018 12: 51
    +1
    Quote: vlad007
    What kind of unity are we talking about when the difference in incomes of managers and workers even at STATE enterprises (Roscosmos, Rostekh, Rusnano, Rosatom) is outrageous.

    Yeah. Moreover, without Moscow concerns, plants existed for half a century or more. Those closer to Moscow received the order directly, and then the work was distributed to KB and factories throughout the country. Now the situation is SAME, only a substantial part of the profits goes to concerns "over the roof". As a result, the number of rank-and-file engineers and production workers is quite comparable with the managerial staff, which is fed by their work, and given the difference in salaries by several times or even orders of magnitude, the final difference in costs for working people and for the top managers becomes even more critical.
  20. flicker
    flicker 2 March 2018 13: 44
    +2
    It is necessary to involve as many people as possible in the argument. It does not matter what the argument is about, if only not for the total impoverishment of the nation and the reasons for such a shameful phenomenon. It is stupid because it turns out in front of the rest of the world when the poor and losers live on the richest territory of the planet.
    This is understandable - this is a training manual. And here it is:
    And even the leader of the world proletariat, whose mummy smokes the sky in the very heart of the capital of the Russian Empire destroyed by it
    and these are the emotions of the author, which hit over the edge.
    All this is boring, even to raise the rating - in a word winked
    1. AUL
      AUL 2 March 2018 15: 57
      0
      Here is an interesting situation - the loudest shout about manuals are those who speak on the manuals and morning instruction!
      And about TV - I completely agree with the author of the article. Watching is not just disgusting - it's a shame! Is our people considered such a cattle that you can feed this shit?
      1. flicker
        flicker 2 March 2018 16: 14
        +2
        And what does Lenin have to do with these talk shows?
        About which, a certain Fonvizinsky "Undergrowth" writes only "whose mummy smokes the sky." Do not sweep out your anger anymore?
  21. Robin - Bobbin
    Robin - Bobbin 2 March 2018 14: 56
    0
    A normal person can hardly watch these chants and shout-shows. For me it’s enough to watch Pushkova PS once a week, the program without any hysteria ...
  22. Klaus
    Klaus 2 March 2018 16: 05
    0
    “The TV is just a small transparent window in the pipe of the spiritual garbage chute. "
    (V. Pelevin.)
  23. fix
    fix 2 March 2018 16: 45
    0
    The relationship of a rating show is not new. Therefore, if there is a need for serious topics, it is worth watching / listening to unrated resources. For example OTR.
  24. turbris
    turbris 2 March 2018 16: 57
    0
    Our TV experts completely ruined such a type of broadcasts as talk shows, ruined them with their non-professionalism, hysteria, the pursuit of stupid sensations and simply very poor preparation of such programs. The illusion of spontaneity does not convince anyone, our viewer has become much more experienced and sophisticated, it is difficult to carry out these pathetic attempts to increase his rating. Therefore, I do not believe the ratings of talk shows, according to personally my polls among my acquaintances and friends, nobody has been watching talk shows for a long time, then where do these ratings come from? We, and to a greater extent ourselves, are simply being deceived by these professionals from TV, and this is very sad, it speaks of the degradation of the TV industry as a whole.
  25. siberalt
    siberalt 2 March 2018 21: 07
    +1
    Mnogabukf, but the message at the beginning is incorrect. Truth is not born in anything. It exists objectively somehow without us. And only subjective perception gives rise to the same subjective axioms under far-fetched numbers. Why is axiom number 1, not 12898? Could others otherwise reflecting subjects be unknown or not accessible to his mind? And axioms only blunt the mind, holding it back beyond the boundaries of another understanding, usually more true, but again not eternal. By building a logical matrix, the author already makes the reader dependent on his understanding of the world and what is happening. So, you should always be especially careful in perceiving the author’s postulate addressed to you, ideas, if it starts with coding under the guise of an “axiom”, “scientists have proven”, “everyone knows” and other psychological crap. One introduction is already contrary to further immersion in the author’s thoughts. As well as surrender to a gypsy fortune teller on the subject of fortune-telling on the arm with consequences known not only to her, but to the suckers after that hi
  26. Severok
    Severok 2 March 2018 23: 16
    0
    It is high time that these information slops were brought out from television to the place where all slops go. Together with those who ordered them to be shown on TV.
  27. 23rus
    23rus 4 March 2018 10: 15
    0
    We are all different, but no one said about House-2. And why? hi
  28. Seraphimamur
    Seraphimamur 4 March 2018 12: 11
    0
    I always thought who is watching this bazaar show. My friends do not look. And here I brought a mother-in-law from the village 81 years ago there was a stroke but she walks. So you can’t tear it off the TV when the above programs are going. I ask: "What do you like there, do you understand something?" . He answers: "I like that they speak loudly, although there is nothing to understand."
  29. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 4 March 2018 12: 46
    +1
    Of course, first of all, any talk show carries out a political order. There are not very many options, but rather Ukraine, Syria and the "Wild West". With the last two, everything is clear, like a sunrise, but in the first version it is contradictory. It seems that patriotism seems to be warming up on the one hand, but on the other hand, chauvinism and hatred of our Slavic brother, and we are less and less Slavs every year and those who remain more and more enemies of all Slavic and Orthodox. (Here is one history of Western Ukraine at the end of the 19th century and the second history of the beginning of the 21st century). But all political talk shows are still more patriotic than showing shows with rich artists and businessmen or the bad shows “Let's get married. For the poor, who are 60% or more in Russia, watching such talk shows is just hate. Even in such rich in countries like Norway, Denmark, France, you won’t see on TV how their celebrities show how rich and cool they are on TV.Our “cultural intelligentsia” throughout history (except from 1929 to 1954) considered itself to be super people.
  30. ans
    ans 5 March 2018 00: 24
    0
    walk around the floor projection screen

    walk around outdoor to the screen ..... laughing
  31. 1536
    1536 5 March 2018 07: 20
    0
    I think if the number of talk shows decreases along with the airtime they occupy, this will be the first step to increasing life expectancy in Russia.
  32. Sasha_Sar
    Sasha_Sar 5 March 2018 13: 14
    +1
    I caught myself thinking that I haven’t watched these talk shows for the last half a year. And if I accidentally switch the TV to this "crap", I watch from the force of 2-3 minutes and switch. They fell to the level of "Hour of Judgment" and Malakhovsky balabolstva ....
  33. Kochegarkin
    Kochegarkin 5 March 2018 14: 20
    0
    how can one article provoke two opposite feelings ??
    On the one hand, I completely agree with the author. absolutely disagree with the other ...
    and this...
    I also watch talk shows instead of TV shows ... very much similar in the series of our talk shows ... the same plot and characters are the same and the texts are the same, and the pictures (scenery) do not change much in the back background, but still more interesting than TV shows
  34. seacap
    seacap 5 March 2018 20: 04
    +1
    I don’t watch TV, occasionally in the kitchen there’s news about the miracle of nature that Moscow snowed in winter and frost as much as 10 degrees, a nightmare, and how poor they survive there, it’s not clear. The rest of the time, advertising is constant, and on all channels at the same time. At the first, Baba Katya with the look and voice of a market trade in potatoes, and her intellect too, all her education and merit is that she is the wife of a producer’s friend, which means she has the right, her favorite child should wear a 50 K green dress for graduation .On the second, forever ecus, a used amateur gr lazy lingerie and depraved young girls, an aging patron of all the hangouts - Malakhov, who is at the door and he is at the window. And endless dances on the graves of honored and respected people, all this vile servants with screeching and tambourines, the abomination and baseness are complete, they even they don’t understand that Dom-2, against their background, becomes a chamber and highly intelligent broadcast. It’s impossible to watch movies, again because of advertising, but in general advertising killed all TVs, in pursuit of money and because of their greed they killed TV. Therefore, I I don’t watch TV. The authorities do not care about this wireless I went and squalor, bacchanalia in the media, in a country that positions itself as a cultural and great power, people also see what will happen because of the mound and the Internet, this nonsense does not want to digest at home, and the most powerful channel for propaganda of their values ​​by the authorities has been abandoned and given to the liberals and our "partners" at the disposal, and this is in the context of the war against us that is being waged against us. And this is nonsense when they tell us that young people do not watch TV, they watch and also absorb all this abomination and baseness like a sponge, hence and participating I have stories about the beating of girls and schoolchildren about the mass crimes, drunkenness and drug addiction, etc. etc. And what then, that then, after 5-10 years, everyone who had at least some Soviet education and upbringing will begin to leave and the little dogs and bagdosarian will come in their place, and they will sharpen their teeth.
  35. RelictEmpire
    RelictEmpire 6 March 2018 09: 18
    0
    Axiom One. The people are an inert mass subject to:
    1. Parenting
    2. manipulation of public consciousness
    3. The effect of the crowd.

    Axiom two. There is no truth as such. There are only individual subjective projections, and what the author understands as TRUTH is only one that most satisfies all PROJECTION of truth. In other words, the author describes a compromise and for some reason calls it - Truth. The ability to negotiate is precisely the search for a compromise.

    Axiom Three: The Only True. And even then, if the density of the substance is less than the density of the liquid in which the substance floats. Again - another special case. In some cases, the substance is drowning.
  36. Robin - Bobbin
    Robin - Bobbin 6 March 2018 11: 32
    0
    These show chants have already gotten ... Political day, other scandals in the evening - who is whose son, etc.
  37. Robin - Bobbin
    Robin - Bobbin 6 March 2018 11: 37
    0
    Quote: tihonmarine
    But all political talk shows are still more patriotic

    Pushkova PS about politics once a week is enough for me, and talk shows all day long are already too much.
  38. AleBors
    AleBors 6 March 2018 12: 56
    0
    I agree with the author. I haven’t been watching TV for a long time, but my parents love to watch all this nonsense. As if in vain to the root, it is clear that there is an order for all these laces with drool. These shows simply distract people from real problems and distort perception of the world. Again, working with people, I see the results of this impact. People have stopped arguing to prove anything, in most cases they turn into a scream and a bazaar. And the current problems are no longer interested, since the passions are kindled for a completely different reason. And after these shows, people watch TNT absorbing the miasma of the near-toilet theme inherent in this channel, for some reason called humor ...
    Well, against the background of the foregoing, the relaxed brain of the average person naively believes in all sorts of slogans and promises.
  39. tank64rus
    tank64rus 6 March 2018 18: 11
    0
    "Experts" are certainly super especially from Ukraine.