Almaz-Antey has denied reports of a possible disruption of state order on C-400

12
The Moscow Avangard Machine-Building Plant promptly fulfills the state defense order, there are no risks of disrupting plans to produce missiles for the Russian army and foreign customers, said the official representative of the Almaz-Antey concern (includes the Avangard plant) on Thursday, RIA reports News.

Almaz-Antey has denied reports of a possible disruption of state order on C-400




Avangard is the only manufacturer of missiles for the C-300 and C-400 anti-aircraft missile systems, which go into service with the Russian army and are exported. Among the latest projects that the company was supposed to start working on was the supply of several hundred export versions of missiles for C-400 missiles under an agreement that is being prepared for signing with India.

The socio-economic situation at MMP Avangard after the change of the CEO is stable. All workshops and services of the enterprise in working order ensure the timely execution of tasks of the state defense order and production plan
- Said the source agency.

The concern stated that the former head of security and the Avangard regime, Maxim Berg, who accused Almaz-Antey of “raider seizure” of power at the plant and ineffective management of the new leadership, was dismissed due to repeated violations of labor discipline.

Earlier, the Kommersant newspaper published an article referring to Maxim Berg, a former Avangard employee, who said that he had warned the FSB that the company allegedly could fail the GOZ on 2018 – 2020 years and disrupt the execution of contracts under the MTC.
  • http://trest.org/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    1 March 2018 15: 02
    So all these rumors concerned problems with the C500 ... And not the C400.
    1. +3
      1 March 2018 15: 08
      Quote: 210ox
      So all these rumors concerned problems with the C500 ... And not the C400.

      It's just that Dmitry is an internal squabble that spilled out.
      The concern stated that the former head of the security service and the Avangard regime Maxim Berg, who accused Almaz-Antey of “raider seizing” power at the plant and inefficient management of the enterprise by the new management, was fired in connection with repeated violations of labor discipline.

      Well, that one in revenge
      warned the FSB that the company allegedly could fail the state defense order for 2018-2020 and disrupt the implementation of contracts through the MTC.

      The commander’s chairs are divided. hi
  2. 0
    1 March 2018 15: 05
    Sometimes it becomes scary. The only ones in Russia make rockets. One defense breakthrough and we do not have missiles. Reserve for 3 days of defense and ...
    1. +15
      1 March 2018 15: 09
      Quote: bazzbazz
      Reserve for 3 days of defense and ...

      The fourth attackers will end smile
      1. +1
        1 March 2018 15: 39
        The potential attackers do not forget themselves, they will provide their armed forces with full measure. But the frail industry of Russia has not gone in cycles in its safety; the main thing for them is to sell for export. What is the price? They were worried about the Indians. Ugh, except for unprintable vocabulary and nothing comes to mind from this ...
      2. +9
        1 March 2018 16: 36

        ,,, or so ...
  3. +2
    1 March 2018 15: 24
    Internal feuds that leaked to the press. The only thing is that more divisions began to be sent to the troops per year (they shoot more), maybe the power is at the limit ... and a breakdown is unlikely .... IMHO.
  4. 0
    1 March 2018 15: 27
    Quote: 210ox
    So all these rumors concerned problems with the C500 ... And not the C400.

    Probably here you should add S-350. According to the previous GWP 2011-2020, by 2020 the RF Armed Forces had to transfer 10 S-500 divisions (not a single one transferred), 38 S-350 divisions (0 transferred), 56 S-400 divisions (I have exact receipt data no), 27 S-300B4 divisions (I also do not have exact data on entering the troops).
    1. +5
      1 March 2018 16: 29
      wink You do not have exact data! And what should you have accurate data in the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation did not report to you? After all, 3 years is yet to come. Allow Report. According to Wikipedia, as of November 2017, 22 regiments / 46 divisions / 368 PU S-400 were deployed. The report is finished. Private stock A.V.
      1. Don
        0
        1 March 2018 18: 57
        According to C-400, yes, they must complete it on time, according to C-300В4 they will partially fulfill it, and for the other two - a complete failure, unless it is counted that 1 of January 2021 will arrive at hour X
  5. +1
    1 March 2018 19: 57
    Quote: Donskoy
    According to C-400, yes, they must complete it on time, according to C-300В4 they will partially fulfill it, and for the other two - a complete failure, unless it is counted that 1 of January 2021 will arrive at hour X


    According to s-500, if the tests in the upper atmosphere are closed this year, they will have to catch up. According to Vityaz, it’s not clear, like at the end of the 17th year all tests were closed, but so far there’s silence.
  6. 0
    1 March 2018 23: 37
    Quote: fan_
    wink You do not have exact data! And what should you have accurate data in the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation did not report to you? After all, 3 years is yet to come. Allow Report. According to Wikipedia, as of November 2017, 22 regiments / 46 divisions / 368 PU S-400 were deployed. The report is finished. Private stock A.V.

    Thanks for the report. There was simply no data at hand. From 46 divisions it is necessary to subtract 2, because they were delivered in 2007-2009. and in GWP 2011-2020 are not included. Consequently, 56 out of 44 divisions were delivered. Most likely there will be no problems with the remaining 12 divisions.
  7. The comment was deleted.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"