The Indian Air Force ordered the DRLO fuel tanker

34
The Indian Air Force Command has sent an order to the National Organization for Defense Research and Development to finalize the design of the long-range radar aircraft for review and control, created on the basis of the European passenger airliner Airbus A330. The military asked to equip the aircraft with equipment for transporting fuel and refueling other aircraft in the air, writes Livefist Defense

The Indian Air Force ordered the DRLO fuel tanker




Aircraft long-range radar surveillance and control, otherwise called "flying radar", are responsible for the rapid detection of enemy air, ground and surface targets and the transfer of target designation data to combat aircraft in the air. All existing aircraft of this class do not possess additional functions. At the same time, modern refueling aircraft, created on the basis of transport aircraft, can also be used for the transport of goods and military personnel.

India has been developing its own “flying radar” since 2014. The cost of the program is estimated at 3,1 billion dollars. Equipping a new aircraft with fueling equipment, which also requires the organization of a filling station operator’s workplace, will increase the program cost by at least 17 percent to 3,6 billion dollars. Details about the promising development has not yet been disclosed.

To date, the organization of defense research and development of India has created a radar station with an active phased antenna array with a mass of 12,5 tons, as part of the “flying radar” project. Airplane radar will have a 360 degree view. The developers claim that the new aircraft will be able to detect fighters or cruise missiles at a distance of up to 400 kilometers. The development of the “flying radar” is planned to be completed by the middle of the 2020s, the scientific portal "N + 1" reports
  • https://www.livefistdefence.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    1 March 2018 14: 01
    India has been developing its own “flying radar” since 2014. The cost of the program is estimated at 3,1 billion dollars. Equipping a new aircraft with fueling equipment, which also requires the organization of a filling station operator’s workplace, will increase the program cost by at least 17 percent to 3,6 billion dollars. Details about the promising development has not yet been disclosed.
    and shove everything in there? and what volume of this tanker will be? shamans however laughing
    1. +5
      1 March 2018 14: 08
      A thing that can do everything well cannot do anything.
      1. +3
        1 March 2018 14: 15
        Quote: Muvka
        A thing that can do everything well cannot do anything.

        here I am, too, the equipment of the distant radar is not a laptop on the table
        1. ZVO
          0
          1 March 2018 14: 22
          Quote: Angel_and_Demon

          here I am, too, the equipment of the distant radar is not a laptop on the table


          Look at the difference in equipment in the ultra-modern E-767 and the old E-3A ...
          You will be very surprised by the huge free volumes ...
          1. +3
            1 March 2018 14: 37
            Quote: ZVO
            You will be very surprised by the huge free volumes ...

            and in cubic meters, how much?
    2. 0
      1 March 2018 17: 30
      and now with all this garbage we’ll try to take off laughing
      I need to tell them to hang brahmos under the wings laughing
  2. ZVO
    0
    1 March 2018 14: 14
    A-330 has a huge amount of internal fuel tanks
    110 tons only in its tanks.
    Plus a carrying capacity of another 40 tons.
    Why not combine?
    The modern element base - will allow to use with reserve the huge volumes of this airframe ...
    There is nothing really incompatible ...
    1. 0
      1 March 2018 14: 40
      The cost of the AWACS aircraft is such that to lose it when solving a secondary problem would be annoying IMHO. hi
      1. ZVO
        0
        1 March 2018 14: 53
        Quote: Alex777
        The cost of the AWACS aircraft is such that to lose it when solving a secondary problem would be annoying IMHO. hi


        A lot of modern tankers are lost in refueling operations?
        It seems to me that not a single one in the last 30 years ...
  3. 0
    1 March 2018 14: 15
    The idea is interesting, but really such universalization, in FIG
  4. +6
    1 March 2018 14: 23
    order to finalize the design of the aircraft for long-range radar surveillance and control, created on the basis of the European passenger liner Airbus A330. The military asked to equip the aircraft with equipment for transporting fuel and refueling other aircraft in the air

    From somewhere came the deafening sneezing of a tired archivist from Russia.
    six I-16s were to be replaced in turn by three aircraft from below and fed on fuel from TB-3. All this "flying whatnot" was intended for air defense, the duration of the air patrol was supposed to be 6,5 hours.
    1. 0
      1 March 2018 17: 32
      in the photo I see only two I-16
      1. +7
        1 March 2018 18: 04
        Quote: faiver
        in the photo I see only two I-16

        Have you ever seen the concept of "should"? Or the word "supposed"?
  5. +3
    1 March 2018 14: 25
    And also compartments for bombs, a bomber aiming system, pylons under the wings for missiles and additional tanks, and a cargo compartment for landing or equipment ... laughing
    1. ZVO
      +1
      1 March 2018 14: 54
      Quote: Alex-a832
      And also compartments for bombs, a bomber aiming system, pylons under the wings for missiles and additional tanks, and a cargo compartment for landing or equipment ... laughing


      Imagine that all this is in the long-flying Poseidon ...
      In addition to a huge amount of on-board electronics to search for submarines ...
      1. +5
        1 March 2018 14: 57
        Quote: ZVO

        Imagine that all this is in the long-flying Poseidon ...
        In addition to a huge amount of on-board electronics to search for submarines ...

        There is no landing ...
    2. +1
      1 March 2018 15: 05
      You still forgot the magnetometer and depth charges with torpedoes ...
  6. 0
    1 March 2018 14: 43
    On horseradish goat button accordion? Torpedoes still need to be added there for complete happiness.
  7. 0
    1 March 2018 16: 03
    Here's an example on our aircraft from Wikipedia:

    Currently, the Russian Air Force is armed with only four types of aircraft capable of refueling other aircraft in the air: the Il-78 tanker, the Su-24 front-line bomber and the Su-33 and MiG-29K / MiG-29KUB carrier-based fighters.

    so the idea basically has the ability to be
  8. +3
    1 March 2018 16: 38

    Well, just like a cat Matroskin, he should be able to do everything! fool
    1. +7
      1 March 2018 18: 14
      Quote: Kurare

      Well, just like a cat Matroskin, he should be able to do everything! fool

      Ett still bullshit ...







      :)
  9. 0
    1 March 2018 20: 55
    To carry kerosene on AWACS planes is certainly a worthy idea. Such a plane will cost at least a billion, maybe they can also put out fires?
    1. +5
      1 March 2018 21: 48
      Quote: APASUS
      Such a plane will cost at least a billion

      Due to what? Well, they will hang UPAZs (or what are their analogues called?), Add heels of valves and pumps, cut 2-3 windows in the skin with local reinforcement. A few TV cameras are plugged in for the refueling operator and they will put his remote control. This is a penny compared to the cost of AWACS itself. If you want a "flying bar", then yes, it will turn out a little more expensive: there you will have to cut more windows and the operator’s equipment (together with its preparation) will be more expensive ...
      1. 0
        2 March 2018 18: 40
        Quote: Avis-bis
        Due to what?

        No, but of course you can use a microscope to hammer in nails, who interferes
        1. +5
          2 March 2018 18: 46
          Quote: APASUS

          No, but of course you can use a microscope to hammer in nails, who interferes

          In your own words, without attracting other people's stamps, can you answer? And, most importantly, on the topic, and not from the flashlight.
          1. 0
            2 March 2018 19: 14
            Quote: Avis-bis
            Quote: APASUS

            No, but of course you can use a microscope to hammer in nails, who interferes

            In your own words, without attracting other people's stamps, can you answer? And, most importantly, on the topic, and not from the flashlight.

            Carrying kerosene for airplanes on AWACS or an equivalent is like hammering the nails of an Apple iPad, the result is the same.
            1. +5
              2 March 2018 19: 39
              Quote: APASUS

              Carrying kerosene for airplanes on AWACS or an equivalent is like hammering the nails of an Apple iPad, the result is the same.

              I get it. You can not.
              1. 0
                2 March 2018 19: 44
                Quote: Avis-bis
                I get it. You can not.

                Well, I don’t know how to explain to you, my dear.
                You can carry kerosene with AWACSOM,
                Mercedes manure
                iPad om hammer nails!
                Well, it’s time to have a conscience, what is not clear here?
                1. +5
                  2 March 2018 20: 02
                  Call someone else dear, I'm normal.
                  Quote: APASUS
                  Quote: Avis-bis
                  I get it. You can not.

                  Well, I don’t know how to explain to you, my dear.
                  You can carry kerosene with AWACSOM,
                  Mercedes manure
                  iPad om hammer nails!
                  Well, it’s time to have a conscience, what is not clear here?

                  *** Yawned, twirled his finger at the temple. ***
                  Learn to express your thoughts, young man, and to begin with, understand what you read (this is about the article and the comments on it, for example, from ZVO; I don’t agree on everything with it, but its opinion has the right to be).
                  1. 0
                    3 March 2018 08: 43
                    Quote: Avis-bis
                    Learn to express your thoughts, young man, and to begin with, understand what you read (this is about the article and the comments on it, for example, from ZVO; I don’t agree on everything with it, but its opinion has the right to be).

                    You are a rather strange type, I will report to you. I have already written to you that the AWACS aircraft costs a billion green money and it’s ridiculous to carry bombs or kerosene with such machines. It’s not advisable to make universal airplanes out of AWACS
                    1. +5
                      3 March 2018 11: 00
                      Quote: APASUS
                      .Make universal aircraft from AWACS is not advisable

                      The Indians didn’t know who to ask. Now cry.
                      An analogue of “hammering in nails with a microscope” would be the transportation of stew on a fighter.
                      If these AWACS have a lot of free volumes in the fuselage, then what is the difference how much this plane costs? Technically, combining these functions is easy. In real life, this will work. How rational it will be is time will tell. And not yksperd APASUS. But write to them that they are fools, otherwise they will disappear, after all, without such a sage.
                      1. 0
                        3 March 2018 11: 32
                        Quote: Avis-bis
                        If these AWACS have a lot of free volumes in the fuselage, then what is the difference how much this plane costs? Technically, combining these functions is easy. In real life, this will work. How rational it will be is time will tell. And not yksperd APASUS. But write to them that they are fools, otherwise they will disappear, after all, without such a sage.

                        I still could not understand where I heard or saw it and then remembered. Such specialists as you are full in the East.
                        Hello to specialists !!!

                        Do you recognize fellow tribesmen?
  10. 0
    2 March 2018 08: 17
    The Indian Air Force ordered the DRLO fuel tanker

    We are waiting for a flying radar - a submarine!
  11. +5
    3 March 2018 12: 18
    APASUS,
    fool
    Dumb you, all the same ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"