More than 20-t complexes "Pantsir-S" will strengthen the air defense of Moscow

42
More than twenty new Pantsir-S anti-aircraft missile-cannon systems will strengthen Moscow's air defense, reports press office Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

More than 20-t complexes "Pantsir-S" will strengthen the air defense of Moscow




The Pantsir-S combat vehicles will be delivered to Moscow suburbs at the permanent deployment points of the 1 anti-aircraft missile regiments of the air defense-anti-missile defense army (special purpose) VKS, where they will be on combat duty for the anti-aircraft defense of Moscow and provide cover for anti-aircraft missile systems S- 400 "Triumph",
says release.

It is reported that earlier these complexes carried out initial combat shooting at the site "Ashuluk" in the Astrakhan region.

"During the initial firing crews ZRPK" Carapace-C "was conducted about 2,5 thousand rounds of missile and gun armament of more than 20 target missiles simulating cruise missiles, aerodynamic targets, unmanned aerial vehicles, as well as the target, simulating ground lightly armored vehicles "- clarified in the department.

Help press service: "ZRPK" Pantsir-S "is an anti-aircraft missile and gun complex of short range, located on the chassis of a truck, trailer or permanently installed. The complex is capable of hitting any targets with a minimum reflective surface from 2-3 cm² and speeds up to 1000 m / s, maximum range 20 kilometers and height to 15 kilometers, including airplanes, helicopters, unmanned aerial vehicles, cruise missiles, guided bombs, high-precision weapon».
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    28 February 2018 15: 29
    Rust will not pass ... well, that is, it will not fly smile
    1. +3
      28 February 2018 15: 51
      Quote: Black
      Rust will not pass ... well, that is, it will not fly smile


      With such systems, apparently, it will not pass and will not fly ... except that only a snake creeps ...
    2. +9
      28 February 2018 15: 53
      Quote: Black
      Rust will not pass ... well, that is, it will not fly

      He didn’t have a chance last time - there was cowardice to give a command .... so the technique has nothing to do with it - the human factor
    3. +5
      28 February 2018 16: 55
      You don’t have to be clever and Rust flew under the Union, only because of the current order of the Moscow Region, where it was written on civilian and passenger airplanes that they do not open fire, but force them to land. But with coercion, it didn’t work out due to differences in the flight speeds of Rust and fighter jets. It seems that everything is already known, there is no one who can not calm down and tries to bite himself on the heel.
    4. +1
      28 February 2018 17: 16
      These systems are included with previously deployed S-400 shelves. 2 complexes per division / 4 complexes per regiment / 20 complexes per 5 regiments S-400.
  2. +1
    28 February 2018 15: 38
    That's right, air defense at especially important facilities should be layered.
    You look and at my dacha this device appears, I have this most expensive material investment.
    1. +2
      28 February 2018 16: 15
      People say that if you put a mortar point in your yard, then this is a sure sign that it’s time to move)))
      1. +2
        28 February 2018 17: 47
        I agree, but still gravitate to good military equipment.
  3. +4
    28 February 2018 15: 41
    I am interested in when Armor-SM will begin to enter the troops ...
  4. 0
    28 February 2018 15: 54
    2-3 sq. Cm ..... all sparrows in the suburbs will be tracked .... laughing
    1. +1
      28 February 2018 19: 44
      According to the performance characteristics, the maximum detection range with an EPR of 2m2 is 24 km, 0,03m2 is 7 km. But 0,03 m2 is not 3 square meters. cm.
      1. 0
        2 March 2018 10: 39
        Respected! If you mention EPR, then calculate the range of the radar, and do not distribute false data from sites ... I just noticed for a long time that many of the forums are not specialists in radar ...
        1. +1
          2 March 2018 19: 22
          Quote: SETTGF
          calculate the range of the radar
          - "According to the performance characteristics, the maximum detection range with an EPR of 2m2 is 24 km, 0,03m2 is 7 km." What you like Specialist is not happy here? You have other data - bring it like that. Only without "it is secret", or "you must not give such information to the enemy."
          Quote: SETTGF
          I just noticed a long time ago
          - You will be surprised, but this is not a site of professional (anyone).
          My comment was that 0,03 m2 is not 3 cm2.
          1. +1
            2 March 2018 19: 38
            Target and missile tracking station
            Work Area:
            - in azimuth, degrees ± 45
            - in elevation, degrees from -5 to +85
            Maximum target detection range, km:
            - with EPR = 2m2 24
            - with EPR = 0.03m2 7
            Additional search area for target designation SOC with a probability of 0.9 for 1s:
            - in azimuth, degrees ± 2.5
            - elevation, degrees ± 2.5
            - range, m ± 200
            - speed, m/s ±60
            The accuracy of determining the coordinates of the target:
            - in azimuth, mrad 0,2
            - by elevation, mrad 0,3
            - range, m 3,0
            - speed, m / s 2,0
            Range of measurement of radial speeds, m / s:
            - on target 10-1100
            - according to ZUR 30-2100
            Simultaneous auto tracking:
            - goals up to 3
            - missiles up to 4

            Working range K
            1. 0
              3 March 2018 12: 14
              Respected! I saw other data that the maximum range of the Pantsir-C1 radar is 36 km with a probability of detection of P = 0,95 ... although this is not particularly important! Many on the forum are trying to refute the possibility of detecting drones as a complex - this is not true. For convenience of calculation in mind, we take the ESR of a 2-sq drone. cm it will be 2 × 10 * -4 sq.m. After calculating, we get that the maximum range of the radar system for a drone with EPR = 2 square meters. cm will decrease by 10 times ... according to my data it will become equal to 3,6 km or 2,4 km according to yours - although only the manufacturer of the complex knows for sure!
              1. +1
                3 March 2018 17: 53
                Since nowhere in the TTX is the detection of objects with EPR = 0,0002 m2 not mentioned, but only 0,03 m2, I think that such objects are outside the radar sensitivity. I think that “2-3 cm 2” came from illiteracy, since many people think that if 0,03 m2, then it is 3 cm2, based on the fact that 0,03 m is 3 cm.
                I agree that the detection range is 36 km, but the tracking range is 24 km.
                1. 0
                  3 March 2018 22: 51
                  Respected! In general, you are right, but as you approach the radar, the corresponding ratio rises and the radar receiver sees at an acceptable range small-electronic ballistic targets and air defense systems can destroy these objects, such as "Shell-C1" ...
                  1. 0
                    8 March 2018 15: 35
                    In general, the calculation was made taking into account the sensitivity of the radar receiver ...
  5. +1
    28 February 2018 15: 55
    Does anyone have paranoia? Around Maaskwa, a stockade of air defense missiles in three rows is standing, and they are deploying armor. It remains to place the division around the Kremlin with needles to place for complete peace of mind.
    1. +2
      28 February 2018 16: 57
      Is that the one you know, right? There is a very good habit, I can share it with you - if you don’t know, then better shut up so as not to look silly.
    2. 0
      3 March 2018 16: 59
      Everything you write is wrong! Each type of complex is designed for its own purposes and for a certain range, as well as the ability to work in conjunction with other air defense systems ...
  6. +2
    28 February 2018 16: 11
    Why am I in Moscow with a permanent missile defense? Who or what threatens Moscow more than other border regions? Why in Moscow?

    In Israel, the iron dome is deployed as needed and where it is needed at a particular moment.
    1. +4
      28 February 2018 16: 36
      Russian Defense Ministry forgot to ask Israeli citizens where to place what ... In addition, one and a half times more people live in Moscow than in all of Israel ...
    2. +2
      28 February 2018 16: 38
      I understand the rest is not a pity! All the "chief" in the MSC are.
      1. +1
        28 February 2018 17: 27
        Quote: fan_
        I understand the rest is not a pity! All the "chief" in the MSC are.

        So in Moscow one periphery lives, your countrymen. 22 million people live in Moscow, if not more. And all Muscovites have long been deported to the countryside, giving them new housing there.
        1. 0
          28 February 2018 17: 33
          In Moscow, together with the Moscow region, there will probably be more than 20 million. But not in Moscow alone.
          1. +1
            28 February 2018 18: 42
            Quote: 8200
            Who or what threatens Moscow more than other border regions? Why in Moscow?
            More precisely, Moscow itself will not be more precise, but more extensive, the nodes of the Central field of defense. The center controls the deterrence weapons (colossal destructive forces, by the way) which are quite enough at this stage so that no NATO rubbish could attack with impunity, as you call them, border regions.
            Quote: 8200
            In Israel, the iron dome is deployed as needed and where it is needed at a particular moment.
            The S-400 and the military S-300 are mobile systems and it is not a problem at all to quickly build them up in a threatening direction to protect troops and objects (which was demonstrated in Syria). Our country is a little large and it is impossible to defend it according to the Israeli principle sorry for the pun.
        2. 0
          1 March 2018 10: 03
          My countrymen live where I live! So now those who have left from their small homeland in Moscow time are now Your fellow countrymen.
          1. 0
            1 March 2018 10: 15
            WHERE will our "surviving" submarine missile carriers in the Northern Fleet under protection in Moscow swim after the attack on Russia? So a slightly redone joke is requested. "Submarine in the Steppes uk eee Moscow Region"
      2. +3
        1 March 2018 01: 16
        I don’t know if the term APR (administrative-industrial region) is known to you? So, based on this term, a security system is organized. Air defense in particular. Siberia and the Urals (and not only them), by the way, are also taken into account. Therefore, about the "rest is not a pity" - this is wrong ..
    3. +1
      28 February 2018 20: 29
      Not very difficult: in Moscow 10% of the country's population, with the region - 15%, control centers, logistics, alas, are tied to Moscow - railway, air, and cars.
      In the rest of the territory, the density is an order of magnitude (orders of magnitude) lower and they are not so sorry for themselves, their beloved, pity ...
  7. +1
    28 February 2018 16: 42
    Who or what threatens Moscow more than other border regions? Why in Moscow?
    And what are they-slaves to protect? From whom? Some other defense enterprises ... to put everything in a clean field, and the offices in Moscow should be covered in three steps.
    Quote: Nasr
    Russian Defense Ministry forgot to ask Israeli citizens where to place what ... In addition, one and a half times more people live in Moscow than in all of Israel ...

    Well, the inhabitants of their country? And what normal enemy will attack Moscow? It is in its current state capable of destroying an entire country - which it does.
    1. +2
      28 February 2018 17: 01
      But you definitely don’t have to ask, you have to believe those professionals in the Moscow Region who are doing this, by the way, they studied this, and what did you learn? On all issues to express their "competent" opinion?
      1. 0
        28 February 2018 18: 36
        Quote: turbris
        On all issues to express their "competent" opinion?

        I do not know to whom it was addressed, but I asked and did not express an opinion.
      2. +1
        1 March 2018 08: 01
        Is it written on me that I haven’t learned anything? I have no right to express my opinion? Isn't there a forum here? Do you have any own opinion? Except that I don’t have to express my opinion. Well? Where is it?
  8. +1
    28 February 2018 16: 49
    The capital of Russia is better to move beyond the Urals.
    In addition to security, Siberia will begin to develop more intensively. And the princes on that side will not say that Moscow is far ..)
  9. 0
    28 February 2018 16: 58
    Will drones shoot down? Oh well.........
  10. +6
    28 February 2018 17: 05
    Quote: fan_
    I understand the rest is not a pity! All the "chief" in the MSC are.


    This is not the case, there will be a major blow to Moscow, and the more missile defense systems the more missiles will be needed to overcome them. In case of a global strike, the number of missiles will be allocated with a margin so that it is guaranteed to overcome the defense, that is, the strike will still reach the goal, only to a lesser extent, and the more missiles fly there, the less fly to other cities of the country, and if they don’t fly anywhere, we have a big country. So, protecting Moscow, we protect the whole country. In addition, the missile defense area not only covers Moscow but also a few densely populated areas around it, that is, in general, the territory inhabited by a significant portion of the population.
    1. +4
      28 February 2018 17: 35
      Yes, your counterpart understands everything perfectly. Just a trollite and muddy water ...
  11. +1
    28 February 2018 17: 39
    As I said, our country begins and ends with Moscow! And it so comes around, God forbid of course ...
    As you all know from the ABM Treaty:
    "... Each side pledged to have no more than two missile defense systems (around the capital and in the area where the launchers of intercontinental ballistic missiles are concentrated), where in a radius of 150 kilometers no more than 100 launchers of fixed anti-ballistic missiles could be deployed. Later, in July 1974, according to the additional protocol to this Treaty, it was allowed to have only one such system: either around the capital, or in the area of ​​launchers of ICBMs (for the USSR - with a center in the capital; for the USA - on the basis of Grand Forks) ... "
    Note, they defended a military base, and we ... Then we were already spinning around a finger ...
  12. +2
    1 March 2018 01: 07
    More than 20-t complexes "Pantsir-S" will strengthen the air defense of Moscow
    Interestingly, what about the “Shell” for other regional cities of Russia? Or is such a defense only Moscow relies on, due to the large number of the fifth column?
  13. +1
    1 March 2018 11: 52
    Judging by the news, Moscow air defense prepare for an attack by enemy drones? Indeed, the loot truly does not know what to do.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"