Military Review

Sergey Lavrov: US prepares Europeans to use tactical nuclear weapons against Russia

41
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov spoke about the US nuclear doctrine during his speech in Geneva (Switzerland) at an international conference on disarmament. According to Sergey Lavrov, the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons by the United States in Europe cannot, by definition, lead to disarmament.


The statement of the head of the Foreign Ministry of Russia leads IA TASS:
Nuclear disarmament is also hampered by the preservation of American non-strategic nuclear weapons in Europe, accompanied by the destabilizing practice of joint nuclear missions. As part of these missions with a gross violation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, non-nuclear members of NATO are involved in planning the use of American non-strategic nuclear weapons and are involved in the development of relevant skills. It should be clear to everyone that in this way the US military is preparing the armed forces of the countries of Europe to use tactical nuclear weapons against Russia.


Recall that tactical nuclear warheads (format - bombs) of American origin are, for example, on the territory of air bases in Germany. At the same time, the USA announced that they were going to completely replace the existing arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons at their bases in the Federal Republic of Germany with their upgraded versions (B61-12).

According to Sergey Lavrov, such a state of affairs cannot be considered "just a rudiment of the Cold War."

Sergey Lavrov: US prepares Europeans to use tactical nuclear weapons against Russia


Foreign Minister:
This is clearly the aggressive position of the United States.
Photos used:
Wikipedia
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The black
    The black 28 February 2018 14: 53
    +8
    Against this background, Ukraine decided to regain the status of a nuclear power ... and built on its territory a repository for radioactive waste from Europe and the United States. laughing
    1. Lekxnumx
      Lekxnumx 28 February 2018 15: 03
      +4
      Yes, I heard the most stupid thing that could be done for a country that saw the tragedy of Chernobyl.
      This is to create a storage place for radioactive waste (foreign radioactive materials) in the same place.
      This is how you need not to love your people, politicians, if they are not okay.
      It's not funny .
      Pysy I would like to read an article about where radioactive substances are stored in the same Ukraine, Russia and Europe. With Russia everything is clear a great country in terms of territory, and how Iran, Ukraine and European countries deal with this.
      1. maxim947
        maxim947 28 February 2018 15: 11
        +2
        ..tactical nuclear warheads of American origin are located in airbases in Germany ..

        And reconnaissance planes flew along our borders, all this cannot but alarm ...
        1. 210ox
          210ox 28 February 2018 15: 14
          +8
          They make kamikaze. Well, of course, we don’t burn in a nuclear fire ourselves. They are worried, in this case, EVERYTHING will die.
          1. Angel_and_Demon
            Angel_and_Demon 28 February 2018 15: 17
            +4
            Quote: 210ox
            They make kamikaze. Well, of course, we don’t burn in a nuclear fire ourselves. They are worried, in this case, EVERYTHING will die.

            we understand this - and they have the doctrine of a preemptive strike, Zadornov correctly said
      2. Nikolay Fedorov
        Nikolay Fedorov 28 February 2018 15: 16
        +1
        Quote: Lek38
        I would like to read an article about where radioactive substances are stored in the same Ukraine, Russia and Europe. With Russia everything is clear a great country in terms of territory, and how Iran, Ukraine and European countries deal with this.

        Is everything clear with Russia? And what of the fact that we are a great country on the territory? Suddenly, we decided to put nuclear burial grounds in the wilderness and put them deeper under the thickness of the mountains ?! We usually put such objects near cities with a population of over one million, because it is also required to work at these facilities.
      3. Huumi
        Huumi 28 February 2018 16: 27
        +2
        She herself does not decide anything. Everything has already been decided for Ukraine in the relevant departments.
    2. gippernano
      gippernano 28 February 2018 15: 52
      +6
      But the Americans are counting on what I still don’t understand? They’ll hit us like a small bomb, and we’ll say, how can they respond with Satan ?, because these poor fellows will blow the entire coast with one racket, ((((and we won’t be pulled by Satan? I really think that such baby - mushrooms will grow in all the stalos of NATO and their allies, or do I don’t understand?
      1. zoolu350
        zoolu350 28 February 2018 17: 58
        +1
        Your Fed owners expect that the oligarchy of the Russian Federation will not dare to use NBC in the places where their children live and study and their money is in the banks.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 28 February 2018 21: 46
          +1
          They will not care - in the Moscow Region there are no oligarchs.
          1. Petrix
            Petrix 1 March 2018 05: 11
            +2
            Quote: Vadim237
            there are no oligarchs in the Moscow Region

            And who rules the ball? MO is only a performer, and war is a continuation of politics. And what is politics in the bourgeois world? - "Pans are fighting - at the lackeys forelocks are cracking"
  2. seos
    seos 28 February 2018 15: 06
    0
    And here the question arises, and why do we have so few TNWs? Maybe because of wow us with shit all and sundry interfere?
    Experts call the amount of 1000 pcs in the Russian Federation ... for security, you need 10 times more ...
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 28 February 2018 15: 10
      +1
      Quote: seos
      why do we have so few nuclear weapons? Experts call the amount of 1000 pcs in Russia

      I wonder what “experts” were put into arsenals and allowed to recount everything?
    2. just exp
      just exp 28 February 2018 15: 15
      0
      what experts and 1000pcs of what?
      if about tactical charges, then their emnip was under 30 thousand.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 28 February 2018 21: 47
        0
        Almost all have expired.
  3. just exp
    just exp 28 February 2018 15: 16
    0
    Yes, they wrote for a long time that the states want Russia to fight with Europe, but whatever it affects.
    like Europe will hit Amer’s tactics, but the strategic one will not be launched, they say Russia should think about whether to skip 10 by 10 ktons on its own, or respond to the states and get hundreds of hundreds of ktons in the load.
    1. Doliva63
      Doliva63 28 February 2018 18: 29
      +3
      It was like that in the days of the Union - we roll Europe into their asphalt with the Group of Forces with TNW, and the Yankees send "gifts". They knew and quietly urinated in diapers. The Russian Federation has a slightly different situation - there is nothing to flatten Europe, and therefore, probably, it is necessary to share "gifts", that is, the States will get less, + BSU for our missiles, + their missile defense (land and ship) - in the end, they hope get to a minimum, probably. But just purely humanly I do not understand, why the hell is all this?
      1. svd-xnumx
        svd-xnumx 28 February 2018 22: 38
        +1
        Amendments to START-3 should be made: for each country that provides territory for Russian US bases, add an expanded medium to each base.
  4. krops777
    krops777 28 February 2018 15: 16
    +5
    Sergey Lavrov: US prepares Europeans to use tactical nuclear weapons against Russia


    American hotheads must be constantly cooled; these fools with their educational level can lead the world to a third world nuclear war.
  5. K-50
    K-50 28 February 2018 15: 19
    +1
    Are pin dosi always hoping to sit overseas? belay
    what naive !!! fool am
    Any blow to our territory carries an answer. It doesn’t matter with tactical or strategic weapons. The "otvetka" will be in Russian, with all our hatred and "dope". In order to once and for all discourage us from popping !!! am
    1. dm_Russia
      dm_Russia 28 February 2018 15: 26
      +1
      once and for all discourage us to meddle !!!

      they have a short memory once and for all. Nobody remembers the story of them.
      1. gukoyan
        gukoyan 28 February 2018 15: 41
        +2
        The answer?))
        Well, well, the situation in Syria showed how ours can respond, the Turks only got off with tomatoes, and now they are almost friends)
  6. Nikolay Fedorov
    Nikolay Fedorov 28 February 2018 15: 20
    +1
    And why should our specialists not engage in training the Belarusian Armed Forces in the use of tactical nuclear weapons? Naturally, with the subsequent deployment of stocks of these weapons in Belarus (of course, with the control of the Russian Federation) ...
    1. K-50
      K-50 28 February 2018 15: 34
      +2
      Quote: Nikolai Fedorov
      And why should our specialists not engage in training the Belarusian Armed Forces in the use of tactical nuclear weapons?

      Maybe because they already know how? repeat laughing
      And that in the warehouses lies neither us nor the adversary is supposed to know. yes
    2. Separ
      Separ 28 February 2018 17: 58
      0
      “Father” will be against. am
  7. The comment was deleted.
    1. cats
      cats 28 February 2018 16: 08
      +3
      Call a nurse, you have an aggravation .. laughing
    2. Nikolay Fedorov
      Nikolay Fedorov 28 February 2018 16: 51
      +1
      Quote: demo
      A statement by the Russian Foreign Minister is quoted by TASS:
      Nuclear disarmament is also hindered by the preservation of US non-strategic nuclear weapons in Europe, accompanied by the destabilizing practice of joint nuclear missions. As part of these missions with gross violation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, non-nuclear NATO members participate in the planning of the use of American non-strategic nuclear weapons and are involved in the development of relevant skills. It should be clear to everyone that in doing so, the US military is preparing the armed forces of Europe to use tactical nuclear weapons against Russia.
      According to Sergey Lavrov, such a state of affairs cannot be considered "just a rudiment of the Cold War."
      Sergey Lavrov: US prepares Europeans to use tactical nuclear weapons against Russia
      Foreign Minister:
      This is clearly the aggressive position of the United States.
      WHAT'S THIS? THIS STATEMENT?
      This is diplomatic bleating.
      As the Yugoslavs, Libyans, Syrians, and earlier Lebanese, Vietnamese, Koreans bleated.

      The statement should be short.
      Like a shot.
      Example.
      On the destabilizing and provocative steps of the American military, we state the following.
      In the event of hostilities, we reserve the right to launch a preemptive strike on the territory of the USA with all the nuclear deterrents at our disposal .... blah blah blah ... All European countries that have deployed nuclear weapons on their territory are also in the form preventive measures will be subjected to preventive impact.

      Sick, you wanted a shorter one. All the orderlies have already fallen asleep while listening ...
      Although the general meaning is true. I agree, perhaps ...
    3. tank66
      tank66 28 February 2018 18: 52
      0
      Please cross out Lexington. There tobacco grows good. Let it remain on the divorce. The rest are yours.
  8. Berkut24
    Berkut24 28 February 2018 15: 25
    +3
    Maybe it’s time to officially publish a list of our goals in Europe with explanations of why it will be nuclear strike? You look, someone will think the fuck is someone else's base.
    1. Petrix
      Petrix 1 March 2018 05: 20
      0
      Quote: Berkut24
      Maybe it's time to officially publish our list of goals in Europe

      What for? Let them think that everything is under the gun. And then they will sue: they say your list didn’t have this object, and you, bad ones, bombed. Compensation will have to be paid for life (if the lawyer lets us down).
      1. Berkut24
        Berkut24 1 March 2018 12: 51
        0
        I think there’s nothing to be afraid of. The court will be in Moscow.
  9. Leonid Dymov
    Leonid Dymov 28 February 2018 15: 26
    0
    Tactical nuclear weapons need to be placed on the border with NATO countries (Poland, the Baltic states), first of all for us, regardless of whether our former "partners" under the Warsaw Treaty do this. "Partners" must necessarily respond with nuclear contamination for their betrayal in the event of World War III. It makes no sense to bombard neighbors with nuclear shells from the Iskanders, except at the US and missile defense bases.
    1. Nikolay Fedorov
      Nikolay Fedorov 28 February 2018 16: 53
      +1
      Quote: Leonid Dymov
      Tactical nuclear weapons need to be placed on the border with NATO countries (Poland, the Baltic states), first of all for us, regardless of whether our former "partners" under the Warsaw Treaty do this. "Partners" must necessarily respond with nuclear contamination for their betrayal in the event of World War III. It makes no sense to bombard neighbors with nuclear shells from the Iskanders, except at the US and missile defense bases.

      Actually, Iskander is not a cannon. laughing and he cannot shoot with shells.
  10. CAT BAIYUN
    CAT BAIYUN 28 February 2018 16: 45
    +1
    US prepares Europeans to use tactical nuclear weapons against Russia

    that is, they are preparing them for a death-bomb? .. Well, let them prepare themselves ....
  11. komrad buh
    komrad buh 28 February 2018 18: 05
    +1
    Minister is right, the Yankees like to fight in a foreign territory
  12. Hurricane70
    Hurricane70 28 February 2018 18: 13
    0
    [quote = zoolu350] Your Fed owners expect that the oligarchy of the Russian Federation will not dare to use the NBC in the places where their children live and study and their money is in the banks.
    Who are you? gippernano?
    So in his profile is the CIS! And the checkbox ... Somehow I also got it, I contacted support, I myself could not change it, although not stupid! And the guy seems to be talking business, as he sees him! Why just poke your nose? I hope you are not out of harm, just haven’t figured it out?
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. Hurricane70
    Hurricane70 28 February 2018 18: 21
    0
    Quote: komrad buh
    Minister is right, the Yankees like to fight in a foreign territory

    And preferably by the hands of slaves ... They are tempting masters ... And then, when they bite, the Indians don’t need the Sheriff’s problems ... After they run to share!
  15. nikolaev
    nikolaev 28 February 2018 22: 04
    0
    Now it’s important for the whole world to declare that, in the case of the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Russia from Europe, the answer will be strategic nuclear weapons in the USA and England (and other places of basing the “world elite”). It is strange that there are still no such statements. So that these creatures could not hide anywhere, even in Antarctica.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 1 March 2018 00: 45
      0
      Our ICBMs will not reach Antarctica - they fly a maximum of 16000 kilometers.
    2. Petrix
      Petrix 1 March 2018 05: 32
      0
      Quote: nikolaev
      the answer will be strategic nuclear weapons in the USA and England (and other places of basing the "world elite").

      If the elite declares this, they will not believe it. The elite loves to be related, and capital knows no borders and nationalities. They are scared only by anonymous statements by junior officers and soldiers about the “imperfect” quality of communications and command, due to which the “not to” particle cannot be missed in the order “not to shoot at Washington”.
  16. Dark_Filin
    Dark_Filin 1 March 2018 10: 24
    0
    Nothing special, it’s not even clear why this news was so popular. Apparently, from banal ignorance. The fact is that nuclear weapons made of fissile materials degrade over time (surprise-surprise). Remember the half-life, huh? The Americans now have easy problems in the nuclear field - I remind you that Westigauz went bankrupt, the Americans did not build new nuclear power plants for almost 30 years (the newest nuclear power plant in the USA was commissioned in 1989 year). Therefore, it was decided to reduce the mass of necessary fissile materials in the bomb (so that it would not be necessary to replace them that naturally disintegrated), and due to a whiter modern guidance system, increase accuracy so that a lower-energy nuclear explosion would have the same efficiency.
    Well, did someone doubt that the United States was not going to remove its nuclear weapons from the EU?