Military Review

Russian "Calm-1" will be a hurricane for NATO aircraft

15
The newest Russian air defense system “Shtil-1” is based on various classes of ships, with a displacement of 1,5 thousand tons. The modular design principle of the launcher ensures its placement in any part of the ship.


The structure of the anti-aircraft missile system includes: a three-channel fire control system, a launcher with transport-launch containers and guided missiles. The modular launcher provides vertical ejection of rockets from the deck position. Depending on the layout, the installation can have from one to three modules. The depth of the ship's cellar is just over 6 meters.

The module consists of 12 cells for transport and launch containers. Module weight without ammunition - no more than 10 tons. The mass of one transport and launch container is 1055 kg.

15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Observer2014
    Observer2014 27 February 2018 20: 33
    +5
    Judging by the cartoon, not only for
    will become a hurricane for NATO aviation
    But for everything that floats, flies and just stands on the shore. There were targets in the radius of destruction.
    1. Artek
      Artek 28 February 2018 18: 14
      0
      and anti-aircraft, and strike rocket, or what?
      1. Dead duck
        Dead duck 28 February 2018 21: 47
        +5
        even on older systems there was such an opportunity ...
        in 2008 it seems the last time they were applied in practice.
        1. Observer2014
          Observer2014 2 March 2018 21: 56
          +3
          Dead duck
          in 2008 it seems the last time they were applied in practice.
          Yes. "Mirage" anti-aircraft missile ("Wasp" I do not remember exactly) But the Georgians planted 100% repeat
          1. Dead duck
            Dead duck 3 March 2018 15: 18
            +4
            Yes sir. "Wasp-M".
            But other systems (in more serious terms) with backlighting are naughty be healthy. good
  2. Egorovich
    Egorovich 27 February 2018 20: 52
    0
    If it’s also good in kind, then Calm-1 is a great weapon! good
  3. Borik
    Borik 27 February 2018 22: 26
    +4
    Quote: Observer2014
    Judging by the cartoon, not only for
    will become a hurricane for NATO aviation
    But for everything that floats, flies and just stands on the shore. There were targets in the radius of destruction.


    A cartoon he is a cartoon, but in reality it happens a little differently.
    1. Captain Pushkin
      Captain Pushkin 28 February 2018 20: 35
      +2
      Quote: Borik
      Quote: Observer2014
      Judging by the cartoon, not only for
      will become a hurricane for NATO aviation
      But for everything that floats, flies and just stands on the shore. There were targets in the radius of destruction.


      A cartoon he is a cartoon, but in reality it happens a little differently.

      And the cartoon is stupid.
      1. Enemy ships are all manufactured in the forties.
      2. An aircraft carrier raises aircraft from a distance of less than 50 km to the attacked guard.
      3. The fighter launches anti-ship missiles from a distance of less than 50 km and from a great flight altitude.
      4. For the destruction of anti-ship missiles used missiles twice as much mass and four times more cost than anti-ship missiles
      I wonder who this agitation is intended for. On the Papuans ?.
      1. Tda tar
        Tda tar 29 March 2018 22: 48
        0
        For the "Papuans," of course.
        1. The ships of the "forties" are many times more durable than the vessels of the 2000s.
        2. Prior to the start of the war, ships carry out undisguised tracking and tracking of enemy AUGs and KUGs, up to visual contact (this is a standard operational situation). In addition, during a DB, enemy AUGs may have other more important and urgent tasks, besides enemy corvette frigates. not to mention the disguise thereof.
        3. For missiles without a difference from what "height" they launch anti-ship missiles, if the target is in the firing sector and the flight height of the harpoon is within the range of altitude for the destruction of missiles
        4. What is the difference, what is the “cost” of RCC if its purpose is to destroy an expensive NK with other parameters of “cost” rather than self-drowning of RCC? Is it more economical to let your ship sink for "saving money"?

        And in general - this video is no different from exactly the same on the sites of the ratheon and the like. This is a standard manufacturer’s advertisement, not a military training film at all. Do not be a Papuan.
    2. tol100v
      tol100v 13 March 2018 15: 33
      0
      Quote: Borik
      Cartoon he is a cartoon, but in reality there are several

      Somewhat worse!
  4. tchoni
    tchoni 27 February 2018 22: 52
    0
    What’s good? The redoubt is no longer "our best weapon" !?
  5. bear
    bear 27 February 2018 22: 57
    +1
    Sell ​​the cartoon to Soros. Let him watch and show friends.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Anatoly Kolesnikov
    Anatoly Kolesnikov 28 February 2018 19: 25
    0
    Amen to all enemies 1
  8. Alexander Prikhodko
    Alexander Prikhodko 1 March 2018 18: 07
    0
    I need one such to the cottage - for every fireman
  9. Slavs
    Slavs 1 March 2018 19: 45
    0
    Good cartoon, with the right characters.
  10. cost 75
    cost 75 14 March 2018 12: 49
    0
    Wow, even an aircraft carrier soaked anti-aircraft missile)))).