Military Review

"Putin's" constitutional scheme in China. Two terms for the ruler - not enough to be!

74
The Chinese Communists proposed to abolish one constitutional provision. Namely, the one that establishes that the chairman of the PRC can hold a leading position for no more than two terms in a row.




This kind of sentence makes it clear: Xi Jinping is going to rule the country for life. Experts are already predicting a return to dictatorship for China. The British newspaper The Guardian even called the upcoming model of government "the Chinese version of Putin Plus."

"The Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party put forward a proposal to remove from the Constitution the provision that the chairman and vice-chairman of the PRC can" hold office for no more than two consecutive terms, "the publication quotes "InoTV". The Guardian newspaper took this excerpt from the Xinhua agency communiqué.

This offer have historical value, says journalist Tom Phillips and quotes expert opinions.

American Sinister Susan Shirk, who worked as Assistant Secretary of State for the Clinton Administration, says:

"Bomb. I did not expect such an open declaration of the new regime ... I thought that he would decide not to do this. ”


“He” is Comrade Si. Most likely, the next ten years, or even more, he will lead the world's second largest economy.

Journalist Bill Bishop, a specialist in Chinese topics, is confident that Xi Jinping is turning into Putin with a plus. Why not with a minus? Yes, because, according to the analyst, the Chinese leader "is much more efficient, powerful and, frankly, more ambitious" than Putin.

Summing up, Susan Shirk: "Without further doubt, I can call it a dictator - for life."

Finally, another expert, an expert on Chinese law and human rights, Jerome Cohen, says unequivocally: the Chinese have forgotten "one of the main lessons of the long despotism" of Mao Zedong. As a result, they have “another long period of hard dictatorship” ahead.

Experts, we note, forget something. At the end of the 20th century and in the first decades of the 21st century, the Celestial Empire showed brilliant economic results. The day is near when China will become the first economy in the world. This will probably happen in the coming years. In fact, the Chinese rulers, who have never been inclined to democracy, are just trying to consolidate the situation in which their economy goes leaps and bounds forward. If everything works out, it is necessary not to change, but to fix. This is probably what guides the Chinese Central Committee.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Thrall
    Thrall 27 February 2018 07: 31
    +20
    Old Man approves of Chinese comrades smile
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 27 February 2018 07: 37
      +9
      Choose him king! Enter the institution of the kingdom in Belarus! !! wassat
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 27 February 2018 08: 06
        +13
        Herculesic hi
        Choose him king! Enter the institution of the kingdom in Belarus! !!
        laughing
        Our here, too, have raved about the monarchy. And what about the norms. career. Oktyabrenok - pioneer-Komsomolets-communist-president-king wassat laughing good
      2. captain
        captain 27 February 2018 09: 30
        +7
        Quote: Herkulesich
        Choose him king! Enter the institution of the kingdom in Belarus! !! wassat

        And what is he alone Batko? Or is Putin the only one? Let's see what happened in our recent history. Brezhnev ruled the USSR for life. Stalin ruled for life. Madame Merkel is also not one or two terms, by the way, for some reason, our liberals and communists forget about this. If the country does not get worse, the bulk of the people, then let them rule for life. America is certainly an example to follow for many people, but not for me ..
        1. Julio Jurenito
          Julio Jurenito 27 February 2018 10: 11
          +4
          One can only welcome the good undertaking of the Chinese comrades. Monarchy is the most reasonable and natural form of government. Monarchy is the power of the Master. Democracy is the power of thieving temporary workers.
          1. Semen1972
            Semen1972 27 February 2018 10: 14
            +3
            Quote: Julio Jurenito
            Monarchy is the power of the Master. Democracy is the power of thieving temporary workers.

            And if you take the 10 richest countries in the world, is it best for people with temporary thieves or monarchs?
            1. marline
              marline 27 February 2018 10: 52
              +2
              You will still laugh, but out of the 10 richest countries in the world, 6 monarchies - Qatar, Luxembourg, Brunei, Kuwait, Norway, the UAE (partially). So it goes... wink
              1. Semen1972
                Semen1972 27 February 2018 11: 52
                +1
                Quote: merlin
                You will still laugh, but from the 10 of the richest countries in the world, the 6 of the monarchy - Qatar, Luxembourg, Brunei, Kuwait, Norway, the UAE (partially). So it goes..

                But we do not have to be the UAE, even with the king, even with the parliaments .. alas)))
                PS Is Norway a monarchy? It seems to be parliamentary ...
                1. marline
                  marline 27 February 2018 12: 08
                  +2
                  Quote: Semen1972
                  But we do not have to be the UAE, even with the king, even with the parliaments .. alas)))

                  Alas...
                  Quote: Semen1972
                  PS Is Norway a monarchy? It seems to be parliamentary ...

                  A constitutional monarchy. King - Harald V. Like the Britons, little depends on the king, but as they say, a matter of principle.
                  In general, IMHO, the main thing is not a form of government, but for the authorities to think more about people.
                  1. Semen1972
                    Semen1972 27 February 2018 12: 31
                    +3
                    Quote: merlin
                    In general, IMHO, the main thing is not a form of government, but for the authorities to think more about people

                    So yes, but more often in a world where there is competition, there is better. This is not only about politics. A man is a lazy creature, if no one controls you and does not breathe in the back, so why strain ...
                2. captain
                  captain 27 February 2018 13: 17
                  +1
                  Quote: Semen1972
                  Quote: merlin
                  You will still laugh, but from the 10 of the richest countries in the world, the 6 of the monarchy - Qatar, Luxembourg, Brunei, Kuwait, Norway, the UAE (partially). So it goes..

                  But we do not have to be the UAE, even with the king, even with the parliaments .. alas)))
                  PS Is Norway a monarchy? It seems to be parliamentary ...

                  Kingdom of Sweden, constitutional monarchy. The volume of GDP at purchasing power parity for the 2017 year amounted to 399,4 billion US dollars (about 52 400 US dollars per capita). Previously, under the USSR, such a concept existed; Swedish model of socialism. They had a government almost entirely of Social Democrats. By the way, Great Britain is also a monarchy.
                  1. Semen1972
                    Semen1972 27 February 2018 13: 43
                    0
                    Quote: captain
                    By the way, Great Britain is also a monarchy

                    Our Guarantor hardly wants to have the status of the Queen of England)) You understand that we are talking about different things. And Sweden is an example of this:

                    "The head of state is the king, exercises representative powers.
                    Legislative power belongs to the parliament - the Riksdag, which is reelected by universal suffrage on a proportional system every four years.
                    Executive power is vested in the government, led by the prime minister, responsible to the Riksdag and required to have the support of the parliamentary majority on key issues.
                    1. Julio Jurenito
                      Julio Jurenito 28 February 2018 09: 21
                      0
                      In fact, sometimes behind the sign of constitutional monarchy hides the most absolute, only gone underground for the time being.
                      Take, for example, the UK.
                      In general, the concept of “constitutional” does not apply to a country that does not have a Constitution.
                      It can still be called parliamentary.
                      Nevertheless, King (Queen) Elizabeth II is the reigning monarch of the United Kingdom, as well as the reigning monarch of fifteen other independent states of the Commonwealth, including not only small islands and archipelagos, but also Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
                      The monarch leads all three branches of government, has the right to dissolve parliament, appoints ministers, and also, as the supreme commander in chief, has the right to declare war on other countries. The fact that he DOES NOT USE these rights is another matter, but if necessary, he can use them absolutely legitimately.
              2. Sergej1972
                Sergej1972 27 February 2018 12: 12
                +1
                UAE Union of Absolute Monarchies. President of the emir of the largest emirate (surpassing the others combined), vice president and prime minister of the second largest emirate.
                1. marline
                  marline 27 February 2018 12: 23
                  0
                  Quote: Sergej1972
                  UAE Union of Absolute Monarchies.

                  Because he wrote - partially wink
        2. Stas157
          Stas157 27 February 2018 14: 24
          +4
          Quote: captain
          Brezhnev ruled the USSR for life.

          So Brezhnev took the helm at almost 60 years old. It’s not surprising to rule for life if you are already an old man!
          Quote: captain
          If the bulk of the people do not get worse in the country, then let them rule for life.

          It’s not getting better in the country, it’s a fact! Real stagnation in the economy. With such a pace of the economy, we’ll not just catch up with anyone, but we’ll slide further down. And what about the bulk of the people, what is even worse if below the poverty line of 20-30 million people? Your position is simply cynical.
          1. Svarog
            Svarog 27 February 2018 21: 14
            +3
            Quote: Stas157
            It’s not getting better in the country, it’s a fact! Real stagnation in the economy. With such a pace of the economy, we’ll not just catch up with anyone, but we’ll slide further down. And what about the bulk of the people, what is even worse if below the poverty line of 20-30 million people? Your position is simply cynical.


            And here, then analysts promise us .. https://news.mail.ru/economics/32692368/?frommail
            = 1 In fact, things are very bad. And it will be even worse.
    2. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 27 February 2018 07: 41
      +4
      Chinese comrades support Old Man! yes
      1. Thrall
        Thrall 27 February 2018 08: 58
        +4
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        Chinese comrades support Old Man! yes

        And not only in words, but serious investments in the Belarusian economy.
    3. weksha50
      weksha50 27 February 2018 10: 55
      +1
      Quote: Thrall
      Old Man approves of Chinese comrades



      Ahem ... And, as a gift to comrade SI, he prepared 50% of industrial production for privatization by Chinese business ... And there - not until a controlling stake ... Only plus one share ...
      Hopes for support and that will enter the top three "spring" rulers? laughing
      1. Thrall
        Thrall 27 February 2018 11: 13
        +1
        Quote: weksha50
        As a present to SI, he prepared 50% of industrial production for privatization by Chinese business ... And there - not until a controlling stake ... Only plus one share ...

        Smaller Charter-97, Belarusian partisans and the like read smile
        1. weksha50
          weksha50 28 February 2018 11: 26
          +1
          Quote: Thrall
          Smaller Charter-97, Belarusian partisans and the like read


          I don’t even know such names ... But what I get into the news feed in the morning I read ... I'm afraid to lie, but I think I read it in tass.ru ... hi
  2. Herculesic
    Herculesic 27 February 2018 07: 36
    +4
    The monarchy in China needs to be restored, and Pina be appointed emperor! "China's People's Monarchical Imperial Republic" wassat The new name of China! !! good
    1. dog breeder
      dog breeder 27 February 2018 08: 37
      +3
      In China, most emperors were not hereditary. Everything was taken from the sword.
    2. Polite Moose
      Polite Moose 27 February 2018 09: 38
      +1
      Quote: Herkulesich
      The monarchy in China needs to be restored, and Pina be appointed emperor!

      Well, at you have globally enough ... We can simply borrow Medvedev for 5 years. Somehow smack ...
  3. Felix99
    Felix99 27 February 2018 07: 36
    +9
    Finally, another expert, a specialist in Chinese law and human rights, Jerome Cohen, says unequivocally: the Chinese have forgotten "one of the main lessons of a long despotism" by Mao Zedong. As a result, they have “another long period of harsh dictatorship” ahead of them.
    I recall the violation of the rights of a certain people, which a certain leader drove through the desert for 40 years. Is he called a Despot?
    1. dog breeder
      dog breeder 27 February 2018 08: 39
      +1
      The ekperdy of the western editions are the most expert. Their opinion should be guided from morning to evening.
      1. krops777
        krops777 27 February 2018 09: 31
        +2
        The ekperdy of the western editions are the most expert. Their opinion should be guided from morning to evening

        Ukraine and the Baltic states are a vivid example of this. wassat
  4. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 27 February 2018 07: 40
    +4
    more effective, influential and, frankly, more ambitious ”than Putin.
    You already decide who is cooler! And who appointed Trump as president? That's it!
    1. Felix99
      Felix99 27 February 2018 13: 58
      0
      Could Mr. Xi, according to Chinese tradition, ask Mr. Pu to appoint Mr. Do?
  5. Cxnumx
    Cxnumx 27 February 2018 07: 46
    +7
    Putin still has a different scheme - no one changed the constitution during his reign)))
    1. Svarog
      Svarog 27 February 2018 08: 39
      +9
      Quote: K0
      Putin still has a different scheme - no one changed the constitution during his reign)))

      Come on?
      1. Cxnumx
        Cxnumx 27 February 2018 09: 10
        +6
        Quote: Svarog
        Come on?

        yes, count up! the constitution was changed when the president was Medvedev.
        Law of the Russian Federation on Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of December 30, 2008 N 6-FKZ
        "On changing the term of office of the President of the Russian Federation and the State Duma"
        Approved by the State Duma on November 21, 2008
        Approved by the Federation Council on November 26, 2008
        President of Russian Federation
        D. Medvedev
        Moscow Kremlin
        30th of December 2008
        N 6-FKZ
        1. Svarog
          Svarog 27 February 2018 09: 11
          +3
          Quote: K0
          Quote: Svarog
          Come on?

          yes, count up! the constitution was changed when the president was Medvedev.
          Law of the Russian Federation on Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of December 30, 2008 N 6-FKZ
          "On changing the term of office of the President of the Russian Federation and the State Duma"
          Approved by the State Duma on November 21, 2008
          Approved by the Federation Council on November 26, 2008
          President of Russian Federation
          D. Medvedev
          Moscow Kremlin
          30th of December 2008
          N 6-FKZ

          Well yes absolution wassat
        2. krops777
          krops777 27 February 2018 09: 33
          +3
          yes, count up! the constitution was changed when the president was Medvedev.


          And Crimea and Sevastopol as subjects when and by whom were introduced into the constitution, huh?
          1. woron333444
            woron333444 27 February 2018 10: 46
            0
            krops777 Today, 13:33 ↑ New
            yes, count up! the constitution was changed when the president was Medvedev.
            And Crimea and Sevastopol as subjects when and by whom were introduced into the constitution, huh?

            Yes, such changes at least every month.
          2. Cxnumx
            Cxnumx 27 February 2018 10: 51
            0
            Quote: krops777
            And Crimea and Sevastopol as subjects when and by whom were introduced into the constitution, huh?

            um ... and how does this relate to other terms of the presidency?
        3. weksha50
          weksha50 27 February 2018 10: 57
          +2
          Quote: K0
          yes, count up! the constitution was changed when the president was Medvedev.


          Again, Parsley framed ... lol
  6. Same lech
    Same lech 27 February 2018 07: 47
    +6
    “He” is Comrade Si. Most likely, the next ten years, or even more, he will lead the world's second largest economy.


    The horses at the crossing do not change ... the system of state governance in CHINA is fundamentally different from the system in the United States.
    For the USA, any state that does not obey their rules is a regime or dictatorship ... it is very clearly visible in the behavior of US politicians ... Americans have played their democracy ... in their hegemony of American power ... there comes a time when independent Americans will fight back country.
    1. Svarog
      Svarog 27 February 2018 09: 17
      +12
      Quote: The same Lech
      “He” is Comrade Si. Most likely, the next ten years, or even more, he will lead the world's second largest economy.


      The horses at the crossing do not change ... the system of state governance in CHINA is fundamentally different from the system in the United States.
      For the USA, any state that does not obey their rules is a regime or dictatorship ... it is very clearly visible in the behavior of US politicians ... Americans have played their democracy ... in their hegemony of American power ... there comes a time when independent Americans will fight back country.

      There are cons in any system, but the most important minus of the system is when the leader rules for life. Firstly, there is no political competition - and this will lead to what we now have, stagnation with a vector for degradation. Secondly, a person in power for life, loses touch with reality and completely breaks away from the people and their needs. Actually, this is also visible given what is happening in Russia.
      1. Galleon
        Galleon 27 February 2018 09: 43
        +5
        Svarog, you say how you read a piece of paper prepared in advance. Remember Dan's grandfather, Dan Xiao Ping. 20 years in power, it was in his reign - the root of China's current prosperity. It was he who ordered the suppression when lured mercenaries and fooled students went to Tiananmen. Each country has its own path, and in the recent history of China there are good examples of a long reign.
        1. Agasfer Lukic
          Agasfer Lukic 27 February 2018 13: 39
          0
          13 years old, of which 5 more years of the internal party struggle. And Den couldn’t be compared with X, too different figures .....
        2. Svarog
          Svarog 27 February 2018 21: 20
          +3
          Quote: Galleon
          Svarog, you say how you read a piece of paper prepared in advance

          So I can write texts for the leadership of the country laughing What other pieces of paper, read here .. https://news.mail.ru/economics/32692368/?frommail
          =1
          This is not what I say, and a resource like that which the pro-Putin people trust ..
  7. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 27 February 2018 07: 51
    +10
    For the states, such a scheme is also in China as a sickle by reason, especially with a leader who thinks in the interests of his country, for the future and is hardly accessible for physical elimination .... And in a nuclear power, such a leader is a terrible dream for Washington in general .. laughing
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 27 February 2018 07: 59
      +3
      Victor, salute! hi
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      For the states, such a scheme is also in China as a sickle by reason, especially with a leader who thinks in the interests of his country, the future and is inaccessible for physical elimination

      I agree . Interesting: will a local Ksushad appear in China? wink recourse
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 27 February 2018 08: 14
        +10
        bouncyhunter Hello Pasha. Sorry for the intrusion
        Interesting: will a local Ksushad appear in China?
        It may appear. But not for long. The Chinese do not stand on ceremony. They will shoot at once.
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 27 February 2018 08: 19
          +2
          Hello Seryoga, everything is normal! hi
          Quote: Observer2014
          It may appear. But not for long. The Chinese do not stand on ceremony. They will shoot at once.

          I think that the appearance of such Ksyushads will be strangled in the bud.
      2. KVU-NSVD
        KVU-NSVD 27 February 2018 08: 15
        +4
        local Ksyushad
        Hi hi I think it’s unlikely, although if C had once had a boss to whom he owed ... then everything could be ... but there the Communist Party .. winked therefore, they will not be allowed to such a level ..
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 27 February 2018 08: 20
          +2
          Quote: KVU-NSVD
          therefore, they will not be allowed to such a level ..

          I already said above:
          Quote: bouncyhunter
          I think that the appearance of such Ksyushads will be strangled in the bud.
          1. cniza
            cniza 27 February 2018 08: 27
            +3
            Good day to all! hi Tiananmen Square has not been canceled. lol
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 27 February 2018 08: 31
              +2
              Hi Victor! hi
              Quote: cniza
              Tiananmen Square has not been canceled.

              That's for sure ! The Chinese are able to beautifully and effectively furnish everything. And not only they - Korean neighbors are also strong in this regard. lol
              1. cniza
                cniza 27 February 2018 08: 34
                +2
                Pasha, welcome! hi their morals are there and they do not impose them on anyone, but live as they understand it.
                1. bouncyhunter
                  bouncyhunter 27 February 2018 08: 39
                  +2
                  Quote: cniza
                  their morals are there and they do not impose them on anyone, but live as they understand it.

                  That's right, this is what infuriates the unspeakably meager crap. bully
                  1. cniza
                    cniza 27 February 2018 08: 42
                    +2
                    They do not understand that soon everything will be sent in clear text everywhere, the DPRK lowered them below the baseboard.
                    1. bouncyhunter
                      bouncyhunter 27 February 2018 08: 47
                      +2
                      Thus creating a good precedent. yes
          2. KVU-NSVD
            KVU-NSVD 27 February 2018 08: 32
            +3
            bouncyhunter
            Pasha mail look
  8. cats
    cats 27 February 2018 07: 52
    +5
    Putin's regime, squaring his shoulders. X mode, by leaps and bounds. But the Mirikos has a democratic red-haired clown, who sees a deal in everything, and signs of a sunset of gigimony.
    Well, how not to envy request
  9. Esoteric
    Esoteric 27 February 2018 07: 56
    +12
    People who change the constitution adopted (albeit by a dubious) majority for personal gain without holding a referendum on the amendment introduced, even if hiding under the Constitutional Assembly, the Federation Council and other authorities do not have the right to exist. They put the right of people to self-determination below the right of a particular group of persons. If such provisions are included in the Constitution of the country, then this is the most common management guide imposed from the outside, regardless of what size and age the dogs developed it ... Putin named them ... pah ... Tipun into their hands and tongues .. . wassat
    1. Svarog
      Svarog 27 February 2018 08: 42
      +5
      Quote: Esoteric
      They put the people's right to self-determination below the right of a separate group of persons

      They don’t put anything on the people at all .. This is a rollback to the past, and not the best.
  10. flicker
    flicker 27 February 2018 08: 45
    +3
    While Russia holds the main information and sanctions strike, China
    goes leaps and bounds forward
    . China understands that the world is on the verge of fateful changes and wants to play it safe from any surprises that may arise with a change of leader.
  11. demo
    demo 27 February 2018 09: 04
    +4
    God forbid you live in an era of change.
    If this is Chinese wisdom, then it is based on the lessons that the Chinese have learned over the millennia of civil wars, occupation, fragmentation of the country, millions of citizens destroyed.
    And what is Mao’s 30 years in power?
    A moment in history.

    Chinese society, conservative and patriarchal in its essence, does not strive for constant changes in power structures.
    The main thing for the Chinese is not to change the rules of the game.
    The second is wealth in the family.
    And the third is children and grandchildren.
    Then as they say - life was a success.

    Xi correctly caught the wind in his sails.
    Today's world, under the destructive pressure of Western “values,” is extremely dangerous for Chinese society.
    It is dangerous for everyone.
    But especially for them.
    Too we and they are different from each other.
    And this is not a turn of speech.
    If the Chinese take away the foundation in the form of relatives, ties, traditions and customs, then he becomes just a two-legged amorphous robot.
    Unlike us, the Chinese do not think of themselves outside their society.

    And in order not to delay the conclusion, they are not looking for good from good.

    Socialism with Chinese characteristics is the most acceptable state system for the PRC.
    Any changes in the status quo will lead to such consequences that little will not seem to anyone.
  12. bratchanin3
    bratchanin3 27 February 2018 09: 09
    +4
    It is the Americans who introduced the system of “no more than two terms,” because in the United States financial clans, through Congress, exercise legislative power, and the President is the Chief Executive - a hired manager. Therefore, they don’t give a damn and forget what the Americans are offering and introducing - for Russia this is a different world.
  13. alex-cn
    alex-cn 27 February 2018 09: 20
    +2
    Why not? if the leader is good, then please ... The most "constitutional" USA of Franklin Roosevelt was elected FOUR CONTRACTS despite the fact that under the constitution the president cannot be elected more than two times, independently or consecutively.
    1. Blackmokona
      Blackmokona 27 February 2018 09: 45
      +1
      The amendment to the US Constitution, which can not be more than two times, was precisely because of Roosevelt, and it was adopted after his death
    2. Freeman
      Freeman 27 February 2018 09: 48
      +2
      Quote: alex-cn
      Why not? if the leader is good, then please ... The most "constitutional" USA of Franklin Roosevelt was elected FOUR CONTRACTS despite the fact that under the constitution the president cannot be elected more than two times, independently or consecutively.

      The 22nd amendment to the US Constitution was adopted after the death of Roosevelt. Prior to this, there was only an “unwritten tradition" of not being elected for more than two terms.
    3. Svarog
      Svarog 27 February 2018 21: 23
      +4
      Quote: alex-cn
      Why not? if the leader is good, then please

      And if bad? And if everything is bad in the country, but the leader is good? laughing
  14. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 27 February 2018 09: 24
    0
    The chairman of the PRC can hold a leadership position for no more than two consecutive terms.

    bad example is contagious
  15. Galleon
    Galleon 27 February 2018 09: 35
    +2
    Absolutely normal form of government for the East is despotism, i.e. the power of one. Democracy there is not normal, but the whole East has been living in despotism for thousands of years: from Dakar to Tokyo, with access to Russia, by the way. The Chinese comrades are on the right track.
  16. Dormidont
    Dormidont 27 February 2018 10: 15
    +1
    tell better about the king lyska
  17. Loess
    Loess 27 February 2018 10: 21
    +1
    "The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China has put forward a proposal to remove from the Constitution the provision that the chairman and vice-chairman of the PRC can" hold office for no more than two consecutive terms, "
    And I have always believed that stability is the main thing for the development of the state, and if the electoral system is not able to ensure continuity, then such a system should be improved.
    1. Don
      Don 27 February 2018 12: 09
      +5
      Quote: Less
      And I always believed that the main thing for the development of the state is stability

      The main engine of development is the right reforms. Without this, even with stability, a country may lag behind in development - the notorious stagnation. Revolutionary upheavals and subsequent changes sometimes lay the foundation for accelerated development and even a faster lead. Of course, stable development is more preferable for the country, but it is very difficult to achieve it when power does not change. As you know, competition is the engine of progress. When any president, minister, official, factory or enterprise does not have healthy competition, this leads to a deceleration of development.
      Quote: Less
      and if the electoral system is not able to ensure continuity, then such a system should be improved.

      An electoral system cannot automatically guarantee a good development of a country. Its main advantage is that it allows you to change ineffective power, or extend the term of government for an effective one. The monarchical system or other irremovable, do not allow this. That is why tyrants and despots appear. The desire to appoint a king is the desire to shift responsibility for a possible wrong choice, which happens from a person’s insufficient mental development. This is a flawed position, especially in the 21 century.
      1. Loess
        Loess 27 February 2018 12: 16
        0
        Quote: Donskoy
        The desire to appoint a king is the desire to shift responsibility for the future from oneself. This is a flawed position, especially in the 21 century.

        I said
        Quote: Donskoy
        if the electoral system is not able to ensure continuity, then such a system should be improved.

        improve, not be replaced by another system.
  18. Altona
    Altona 27 February 2018 11: 19
    0
    Journalist Bill Bishop, a specialist in Chinese topics, is confident that Xi Jinping is turning into Putin with a plus. Why not with a minus? Yes, because, according to the analyst, the Chinese leader "is much more efficient, powerful and, frankly, more ambitious" than Putin.
    ------------------------------
    What does this consist of? China is still preoccupied with building its Silk Roads, the problem of Taiwan has turned into some kind of eternal, the passage of an American destroyer past some Spratly provokes violent tantrum with the sending of Chinese AUG, Confucian silence from the UN Security Council from China. The revival of the socialist camp for the Chinese Communists is for some reason uninteresting, competition is visible and all matters. Ah, the Chinese, are you definitely communists or just an Asian clone of the USA?
  19. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 27 February 2018 14: 58
    0
    Well, right in all kinds of FSA there is no normal ruler all bandits and terrorists rule and these rotten "people" certainly do not need strong authorities in other countries putting them in their place.