Military Review

Grushko: It's the cooperation between NATO and Russia stopped

35
The leadership of the North Atlantic bloc ceased any practical cooperation with the Russian Federation on a military line and is not ready to conduct a constructive dialogue in the format of the Russia-NATO Council Interfax Statement by the Deputy Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation, Alexander Grushko.




We are not leaving the dialogue. And from their side one obstacle - NATO in its practical actions strengthens the eastern flank against a non-existent threat, and in the areas of common interests all cooperation has been stopped,
said Grushko.

According to him, “the leadership of the alliance likes to talk about the need for de-escalation, preventing dangerous military incidents and misinterpreting the intentions of another, but does not do anything to restore normal communications along a military line.”

Today it is clear that no organization, even the strongest, as NATO likes to call itself, is able to ensure its security. You can not isolate themselves from the outside world and build traffic islands. Only equal cooperation with all world players, including Russia, can improve the situation and can lead to such interaction schemes that will truly cope with all the numerous threats that
stressed the diplomat.

A NATO spokesman recently told the Izvestia newspaper that “the nature of the Alliance’s relations with Russia and the desire for partnership will depend on a clear, constructive change in Russia's actions, indicating compliance with international law, international obligations and obligations of Russia.”

The publication reminds that in January of this year, Vladimir Putin dismissed Grushko from the post of permanent representative of the Russian Federation to NATO and appointed him deputy minister of foreign affairs. Until now, his successor has not been appointed. There is a possibility that Moscow will reduce the level of representation of the Alliance to a temporary attorney.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ancestors from Don
    ancestors from Don 26 February 2018 15: 05
    +6
    NATO is a bunch of mummers, they do not exist for defense, but in order to attack together, one on one is not their method.
    1. Tatar 174
      Tatar 174 26 February 2018 15: 14
      +7
      Quote: Ancestors from the Don
      NATO is a bunch of mummers

      This is so, but the most important thing in NATO is that it is a business project of North American arms manufacturers and they will never close it, who will voluntarily refuse such fabulous profits? The fact that we have now “climbed into” Syria and are demonstrating the effectiveness of our weapons there infuriates the barons of the arms business — NATO bosses, and therefore attacks on us on all fronts have even reached the sport. But Russia, after all, is not a submarine mongrel that you can drive away or shut up, we will take our own anyway, thanks to V.V. Putin, he is doing everything right in foreign policy. And the fact that we cut off all cooperation with them is nothing wrong with that, but we must continue to talk.
      1. Anarchist
        Anarchist 26 February 2018 15: 15
        +10
        NATO in practical actions strengthens eastern flank against non-existent threat

        Did Grushko go blind? Creating a threat - there is a goal! The creation of a threat - from our point of view, and from them - the early elimination of possible consequences ...
        NATO will start the war as soon as they are sure of victory.
        1. Tatar 174
          Tatar 174 26 February 2018 15: 21
          +2
          Quote: Anarchist
          Creating a threat - there is a goal!

          Well, yes, if there is no threat then how to keep everyone in fear and sell their weapons under this pretext! Now they have a new market appeared in the person of Dill, I can imagine how happy they are that they have found buyers and will now make a profit. Poor Ukrainians, where will your pensions and salaries go now ...
          1. cniza
            cniza 26 February 2018 15: 34
            +3
            [quote = Anarchist] [quote] NATO will start the war as soon as they are sure of victory. [/ quote]

            As soon as such data is given to them by the computer, they will start immediately, but even the computer will not give out such.
        2. Tatar 174
          Tatar 174 26 February 2018 15: 24
          0
          Quote: Anarchist
          NATO will start the war as soon as they are sure of victory.

          Are you sure about this? Well, not to the same extent, they moved their minds to voluntarily agree to self-destruction, it's not some dill that went crazy for Russophobia.
          1. Anarchist
            Anarchist 26 February 2018 15: 50
            +4
            Quote: Tatar 174
            Are you sure about this?

            Dear, read carefully:
            Quote: Anarchist
            The creation of a threat - from our point of view, and from them - the early elimination of possible consequences ...
            NATO will start the war as soon as they are sure of victory.

            They know they will "snap off"! They are surrounded in the hope of a long-term perspective ... They hope that in the future they will be able to win without consequences.
            In the meantime, they wait and do not rock the boat, because
            Quote: Tatar 174
            not to the same extent they moved their minds to voluntarily agree to self-destruction
          2. Nikolay Fedorov
            Nikolay Fedorov 26 February 2018 15: 51
            +2
            Quote: Tartar 174
            Quote: Anarchist
            NATO will start the war as soon as they are sure of victory.

            Are you sure about this?

            Do you think that the West can think in some other categories, such as love, friendship and good neighborly relations ?! Only the fear of rowing back the luli in retaliation keeps them from the command to “destroy the Russians”. As soon as this fear disappears from them, they will attack. 100 %.
            "Russia is a dwarf, I will put it on its knees" - Karl the 12th believed and attacked Russia.
            Napoleon was firmly convinced of his victory: "Russia is a colossus with feet of clay." Hitler was going to conquer the USSR by the end of the year, believed in his invincibility, and therefore attacked from a worse situation than that in which NATO is now.
            Quote: Tartar 174
            Well, not to the same extent, they started moving their minds to voluntarily agree to self-destruction

            What self-destruction if they believe in their invincibility ?! Because of weapons of mass destruction? Hitler was also afraid of WMD, but he was sure of his victory, so the fear of WMD did not stop him.
            Quote: Tartar 174
            it’s not dill that has gone crazy for Russophobia.

            They are not dill. They are much worse. Their illness has been going on for many centuries and is progressing.
            1. The comment was deleted.
        3. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 26 February 2018 16: 02
          +2
          Quote: Anarchist
          NATO will start the war as soon as they are sure of victory.

          Therefore, they will not start. They are not even sure of victory with respect to North Korea. As for Russia, NATO, as always, will go through provocations and injections through the "allies" with the goal of drawing Russia into some sort of long-running regional conflict, and at the same time, as before, they will try to rock the situation from within Russia, relying on bribing the corrupt national elite of subjects Russia, the fifth column, linguistic and religious contradictions aimed at splitting Russian society on a national basis, which is worse for Russia than nuclear war.
    2. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii 26 February 2018 15: 49
      +6
      But the data, with reports on the conduct of exercises and the deployment of troops with weapons, begs.
  2. sxfRipper
    sxfRipper 26 February 2018 15: 06
    +3
    It was time to do it! Any bureaucratic structure (NATO is no exception) seeks self-preservation in the first place, and for this it is necessary to puff up with all your might, proving again and again that "there is a big Russia in the east," who is sleeping and sees everything and everyone under him!
  3. bazzbazz
    bazzbazz 26 February 2018 15: 06
    +1
    NATO is preparing for war ?!
    1. Berber
      Berber 26 February 2018 15: 12
      +1
      NATO is a substructure of Washington, and even diverse. What is the point of talking with an intermediary? And they are always preparing for war. The question is which one, and how do they see it?
    2. Dormidont
      Dormidont 26 February 2018 15: 19
      +1
      Yes her. Flowers plant
    3. patsak
      patsak 26 February 2018 16: 03
      0
      I would say this: "it is NECESSARY to prepare for war !!!"
  4. Zhelezyakin
    Zhelezyakin 26 February 2018 15: 09
    +2
    You can not isolate yourself from the outside world and build islands of security.

    It seems to me that we are deliberately fenced off from the rest of the world and pulled into a bag of open confraction. No matter how gunpowder it smells. You can say to infinity that we are right, and the west is fooling around, but in the end, stay with nothing.
  5. rocket757
    rocket757 26 February 2018 15: 10
    +3
    You can’t even call them something new. Enemies are the whole story.
    And the fact that they behave like hysterics, yes naf on them. Do your thing without looking back at anyone.
    They themselves will die when the time comes.
    1. Alex-a832
      Alex-a832 26 February 2018 16: 03
      +3
      hi
      They themselves, without outside help, will not die. but on such "help" more and more run up. Eupope itself after the collapse of the Union became soft and carried away by liberal degradation, although it is not a small threat and now, if the United States drops its mask, it reveals its fascist face and drives the EU ahead of us in a war with us. They are preparing for this. Under the guise of a space program, they are developing the INF, they began to convince the Europeans that a nuclear explosion almost brings benefits to the body. Apparently, they acutely feel that the dollar empire is ending and a new global war is needed to continue to parasitize. In this situation, there is nothing to talk about with NATO. behind it, Washington is the center of lies and hypocrisy.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2018 22: 25
        +2
        soldier
        Everything is possible in principle. My round head does not include square thoughts for the fact that there is a glamorous soldier, and even more so for a trance and other things. Of course, to create an army of newcomers who haven’t fattened frames, and such an idea can come true, but it sweetens the sweet life ...
        In short, my head is round and I won’t be able to make it square!
        In any case, they are the enemy and we will keep the powder dry, in the powder magazine.
        1. Alex-a832
          Alex-a832 27 February 2018 07: 32
          +3
          soldier
          Victor, welcome!
          A square head has an advantage - kicking it is not convenient (like a brick), and even more so playing football with it. But there is also a big drawback - a helmet will have to be done on an individual order. Therefore, I am also round! laughing
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 27 February 2018 09: 57
            +1
            Hi Alex soldier
            The round head has its own advantages; it strives all the time to roll out of the general heap!
            Poor I am a bunch, it is. And some tried to ride ... Nope, it turned out to be difficult.
            Ento okay, the question is - do not you think that the trolls went on the offensive? it seems that they cheered them up well or greased? Shot a lot of them became active!
  6. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 26 February 2018 15: 11
    +5
    A NATO spokesman recently told the Izvestia newspaper that “the nature of the Alliance’s relations with Russia and the desire for partnership will depend on a clear, constructive change in Russia's actions, indicating compliance with international law, international obligations and obligations of Russia.”
    Interchange the words "NATO" and "Russia" in this quote, and here is our "answer to the Chamberlain." And this situation is called a complete impasse, however, very favorable for the West at the moment.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 26 February 2018 15: 40
      +3
      Another dead end, then the intersection, but we can all again in a circle!
      It makes no sense to strain and worry on the topic. They themselves will come running, more than once and not two, there have been and still will be.
      1. KVU-NSVD
        KVU-NSVD 26 February 2018 15: 45
        +4
        It makes no sense to strain and worry on the topic. They themselves will come running, more than once and not two, there have been and still will be.
        Do not strain beyond necessity - the most important thing. Now is the time of meaningless rhetoric, there will be a time of returning to square one .. smile hi
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 26 February 2018 22: 30
          +1
          Chatter, we’ll listen, and then we’ll clean the barrel and so, just in case, let's shut the shutter ... just in case of a fire, remind the talkers that there are real arguments, weighty in any dispute, incomprehension!
  7. Dormidont
    Dormidont 26 February 2018 15: 18
    +2
    It remains to break the rest of the fetters
  8. Nikolay Fedorov
    Nikolay Fedorov 26 February 2018 15: 24
    +2
    Hitlerite Germany in the summer of the 41st also ceased all contact with the Soviet Union. And even TASS did not react to the famous statement, as if there was no statement. The analogy begs ...
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 26 February 2018 15: 41
      +2
      geyropu compare with the Reich ??? does not pull, and live sweetly, calmly they want. In vain did they go to the ministers of war they have only women?
  9. Herculesic
    Herculesic 26 February 2018 15: 54
    0
    But aren't you tired of jumping in front of them on the circles? We do not need this NATO for nothing!
  10. dojjdik
    dojjdik 26 February 2018 15: 57
    0
    and it is this very “cooperation” that gave us nothing of trepidation and that’s all; and they are already in the Baltics, that's all "cooperation; we will continue to" cooperate "they will be in Kiev; for a long time it is necessary to put an end to such" cowardice "
  11. Russia
    Russia 26 February 2018 16: 15
    +9
    Okay, the NATO Secretary General is not forgetting us. His nonsense in his head shows that everything is not so bad. smile
  12. behemot
    behemot 26 February 2018 18: 10
    0
    NATO is preparing for war, and it is unfair when the natural resources of the Russian Federation do not belong to the staff. The old witch Madeleine Albright (still alive, like an old woman) really wanted to drink water from Lake Baikal, unfairly, you understand that
    this lake does not belong to the mattresses.
  13. 1536
    1536 26 February 2018 18: 46
    0
    Why do we need practical cooperation with NATO? It is enough that Ukraine is “cooperating”. As the saying goes, "Bolivar cannot stand two." And in NATO, this chip has long been cut.
  14. Xscorpion
    Xscorpion 26 February 2018 20: 12
    +1
    Quote: Anarchist
    NATO in practical actions strengthens eastern flank against non-existent threat

    Did Grushko go blind? Creating a threat - there is a goal! The creation of a threat - from our point of view, and from them - the early elimination of possible consequences ...
    NATO will start the war as soon as they are sure of victory.


    Not quite so. NATO will start the war as soon as the domestic political situation within our country allows them, they must be sure that our missiles will not take off. Therefore, they are trying to rock the boat by all means. And while they are preparing bridgeheads.
  15. flicker
    flicker 26 February 2018 23: 53
    +3
    ... not a single organization, even the strongest, as NATO likes to call itself,
    not in the eyebrow, but in the eye laughing that’s exactly how NATO likes to call itself. The second strongest army in NATO Turkey for a month, could not do anything with, in fact, the Kurdish population in Afrin. Once again, the second most powerful army in NATO.
    And most importantly, the United States did not create NATO so that the Americans would die for the interests of all kinds of Poles, Balts, and even not for the interests of Germans, Italians, etc. The United States created NATO so that all Poles and Balts would fight for American interests.