Upgraded "Night Hunter" will be able to control artillery fire

The upgraded Mi-28HM "Night Hunter" helicopters will have the opportunity to coordinate with the missile and artillery complexes of the Ground Forces and the Navy.

According to Interfax, citing a source in the aviation industry, the main role of helicopters will be to transmit the coordinates of targets that should be attacked. This will allow for joint reconnaissance and strike operations. A scheme for interaction with shock aircraft is also being developed. aviation VCS.

The technology of information exchange between helicopters and rocket complexes will be tested at the combat training Mi-28UB. Complete the development of the entire system is planned before the end of this year.

Recall that at the end of last year, the Russian Defense Ministry signed a contract for the production of an initial batch of Mi-28NM helicopters. The first two machines will be manufactured during 2018. They differ significantly from the basic version of the helicopter. The fuselage and engines, the sighting and surveillance system and the onboard radio-electronic complex were modernized, communication equipment appeared with drones.

The Mi-28 helicopter was nicknamed "Night Hunter", as it is able to fight equally effectively at any time of the day. Its main weapons are anti-tank guided missiles "Sturm" or "Attack", reports "RG-Force"

Comments

[Vasya Vassin]

As an amateur, I wonder why this was not done thirty years ago?

[Giant thought]

This is a good embodiment of the idea of ​​unifying the interaction of different branches of the armed forces in a combat situation, we hope that the test of this system will be successful and will not drag on for a long time.

[Berber]

About thirty years ago there was no elemental base. Although the ASUV was developed to the battalion level, back in Soviet times. Protection of communication channels, electronic warfare, data encryption were all taken into account. And this is the development of the early 80's.

[Vita vko]

Quote: BerBer

About thirty years ago there was no elemental base. Although the ASUV was developed to the battalion level, back in Soviet times. Protection of communication channels, electronic warfare, data encryption were all taken into account. And this is the development of the early 80's

The problem, which for more than 30 years is the lack of standard interfaces and databases between different intelligence and weapon control systems. Different types of research institutes, on the one hand, are trying to save money and, on the other, earn money by patenting external interface systems. At the end of the 80s, they tried to bring the ACS interaction to a single standard of SSPD and SSPS, but it did not work out. It comes to the paradoxical. for example, in one area, automated systems of radar reconnaissance of the Navy, East Kazakhstan and the Air Force operate, but between each other they exchange information exclusively in "manual mode". Therefore, the fact that the Mi-28 will be able to give target designations to induce RV&A units is indeed PROGRESS, primarily administrative.

[Berber]

And that's for sure. A single ASUV system is an urgent need. Someone should emphasize this.

[seregatara1969]

thirty years ago, generals fought for the championship in the army

[Zubr]

There is such a thing as evolution.

[shuravi]

Quote: Vasya Vassin

As an amateur, I wonder why this was not done thirty years ago?

What is this?

[san4es]

Quote: Vasya Vassin

... why this was not done thirty years ago?

... Waiting for a contract ...

for the production of an installation batch of Mi-28NM helicopters. The first two cars will be manufactured during 2018. They are significantly different from the basic version of the helicopter. The fuselage and engines have been upgraded, sighting and survey system and on-board electronic complex, communications equipment with drones appeared.

...To complete...

work on the creation of a mobile automated command post of a helicopter regiment (squadron), designed to interact with combat helicopter complexes. It is expected that the entire range of work on the pairing and automation of reconnaissance and strike operations of helicopters with missiles will be completed before the end of 2018

https://vpk.name/news/207587_modernizirovannyie_n
ochnyie_ohotniki_obespechat_celeukazanie_raketnyi
m_i_artilleriiskim_kompleksam.html

[Nasrat]

Quote: okko077

We do not have systems that will provide control for such UAVs ... We do not have complex systems, as the experience of Syria has shown, which allow receiving information from UAVs in real time beyond 100 km ... About systems that provide target designations in real time and these coordinates are transmitted directly to guidance systems, even simple artillery systems, we only have to dream ..... We are too early to have such aircraft as SU-57 and T-14 tanks due to the complete absence of Combat Information Systems ... We will not be able to implement their advantages without such systems and so far they are only high-tech and expensive targets in a modern war ... We do not know how to wage this modern war ... And these degenerates, fairy tales about UAVs, SU -57, and T14 tell us !!! You will learn how to use them first, or rather, create systems that will ensure their effective application!

Somehow it’s not cleverly obtained ...

[san4es]

.. What the hell is he here?

Quote: okko077
We have no systems

Somehow it’s not cleverly obtained ...

[dauria]

why this was not done thirty years ago?

Hmm, were on the basis of Mi-24 and spotters, and helicopters of radiochemical intelligence. And the crews were in the OVE for these purposes. So you wonder in vain. All this is not new. Just the on-board equipment in the series is not so easy to launch, and it should be armed for a bit longer than a smartphone.

[shuravi]

Quote: dauria

why this was not done thirty years ago?

Hmm, were on the basis of Mi-24 and spotters, and helicopters of radiochemical intelligence. And the crews were in the OVE for these purposes. So you wonder in vain. All this is not new. Just the on-board equipment in the series is not so easy to launch, and it should be armed for a bit longer than a smartphone.

C'mon, you, most of the local "experts" about Mi-24К and Mi-24РХР have not heard.

[Berber]

Of course not heard. And at what level was the transmission of information? Speech or automatically to the database?

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: Vasya Vassin

As an amateur, I wonder why this was not done thirty years ago?

who is at the helm? ... and who is driving all sorts of "nano" and "how many" ... questions?

[KVU-NSVD]

Synchron for APD helicopters and ADF RViA great news on the issue of interaction on the battlefield!

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: KVU-NSVD

Synchron for APD helicopters and ADF RViA great news on the issue of interaction on the battlefield!

nadvtulochnaya radar is already a breakthrough .... with us.

[shuravi]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

Quote: KVU-NSVD

Synchron for APD helicopters and ADF RViA great news on the issue of interaction on the battlefield!

nadvtulochnaya radar is already a breakthrough .... with us.

To be honest, the need for it, from the category that it was. For colonial wars, it’s still suitable, for war, no.
First of all, a helicopter is an accurate weapon. And you need to not just shoot in that direction. And also to identify the target, and this is only visually possible. In addition, even at Mi-24, ATGMs drove ATGMs into the driver’s hatch (decommissioned T-34) at test sites. With the radar is not done.
Secondly, any radar is primarily a powerful beacon. Until you find the target, you yourself will be found ten times.

[Falcond]

And in the picture the existing modification of the Mi-28n

[Falcond]

This is a modification of NM

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: FalconD

This is a modification of NM

Do you know the number of troops?

[Falcond]

NM is Zero Cars

[igorka357]

Guys, Apache giggles quietly on the sidelines ... he knows how to do this for a very long time, and he doesn’t have to throw tomatoes at me and call me a Westerner, etc., etc. ... but you also have to look the truth in the eye! 50..type one pilot can’t cope, secondly .. how many 28th are there in the army? MI-28, is it a tank on the battlefield, right above it ... but will there be a battlefield now, all the latest conflicts show that there our helicopter on avionics, it’s not near the amer, and PTRk too ... I would really like to see footage of how our helicopter pilots shoot barmels from a safe distance without entering the military air defense zone, which are, from the beginning of MANPADS, but no of such ... assault and attack by junk! Our guys are obliged to hold the helicopter, the marker must be kept on target ... from here the chance will get either a needle or an arrow .... well, something like that!

[Mestny]

Well, besides howling about "it's all gone," I'll ask about a giggling Apache.
Does this mean that now you do not need to do anything just because there is already Apache?

[igorka357]

Of course not, we have to go, with huge strides, and strive to catch up and overtake, I always talked about this and believed that we would succeed! But I'm sorry, to pass off as achievement that has long been used in the West ... well, as it were buzz, for a headless ura-public it’s possible ... but people who understand the matter understand everything !!! Take them destroyers, there are 68 of them ... yes they will drown our entire surface fleet together with one salvo of their anti-ship missiles .. and about the last two new Burke, the site said ... cut, shamaspil .. and they all have bullshit! Underestimation of the enemy, 50% lost the battle .... !!!

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: igorka357

Guys, Apache giggles quietly aside ... he knows how to do this for a very long time, and you don’t have to throw tomatoes at me,

I completely agree, although there are disagreements with you and me.

[igorka357]

There are times, but what does this mean that we are confident in our points of view, VO is not a kindergarten, although recently the site has turned into such a place, here people should absorb information, discuss and get something new ... for themselves, give people their own, what they don’t know! But even the mogherators recently miss such articles, at least stand, at least fall ... well, just like that .. for sracha, and attendance by all kinds of trolls!

[Falcond]

"Shot and forgot" while on our helicopters are not implemented

[Alexey-74]

Really wonderful news .... why they didn’t do it before is not clear, interaction with army aviation has long been obvious.

[ALLxANDr]

And the designers do not want to work on reducing the EPR? Make more sharp corners so that "in the face" on the radar was not visible. The spherical ball-radar above the helicopter can be seen going 400-500 km! And so the whole helicopter is certainly good! I love Kamov turntables more, but this is a very good product!

[Soran]

"Spherical ball-radar above a helicopter" - suddenly translucent. The fact that under the radiolucent fairing, we can not see and can not evaluate.
A bunch of corner reflections from the rotor hub cannot be avoided. Plus, everything revolves and moves there. Reflect anyway.
Stealth for radars is achieved by low altitude.

[ALLxANDr]

I didn’t wake up in the morning .. Indeed, it is radio-transparent) Thank you for correcting it)

[Romka47]

Why is there no ejection system like in the K 50? how many boys would be alive already, but how many more would save. And so the whole class +++

[Andrey Yuryevich]

[quote = Romka47] Why is there no bailout system like in K 50? how many boys would be alive already, but how many more would save. And so the whole class +++
tell me how many K 50 participated in the database, and how many bailouts saved the pilots. I'm interested.

[Romka47]

A couple of units participated as experienced in Chechnya, have never been shot down, and therefore there are no examples of salvation, 2 helicopters crashed, the first completely raw experienced, the second crashed into the ground, the pilot’s mistake. (I remember they said that the pilot was drunk, but was it big?) . Well, judge for yourself there is a proven system (though not in hostilities) to shoot the blades, then the cabin light, then the chair, I think you will agree that this is a real chance (at least there is) to survive an emergency. Simple and reliable. But they don’t do it on a “new” attack helicopter, dooming the crew of the wrecked car to obvious death (a fairy tale about how the pilots will fall out on some sort of ramp, before getting out of the door, is not even a funny fairy tale.)

[bratchanin3]

For some reason, I believed that drones were engaged in this very thing (reconnaissance and guidance of artillery fire), and helicopters directly destroy targets.