Military Review

Su-57 received "smart trim"

46
The Russian Su-57 received the Squirrel H036 radar, the antennas of which are located not only in the nose of the car (which allows you to see objects in the forward hemisphere), but also are distributed over the surface of the aircraft, according to News.




This will provide advanced fighter capabilities. The machine will receive a circular review for hundreds of kilometers.

“Traditionally, radar antennas are installed in the nose of the fighter in special radomes made of radio transparent material. The station is tightly inscribed in the design of the aircraft and does not reduce its speed and maneuverability. Theoretically, this placement of the radar provides an overview of approximately 180 degrees. The radar does not see the enemy who attacks from behind or from the side of the wings, ”the publication says.

During the flight tests H036 confirmed the declared parameters.

The characteristics of the radar are confirmed in basic modes - when scanning the airspace and the earth's surface. We were able to assess the shortcomings of previous developments and use the latest scientific achievements. For example, in the part of the so-called smart plating - when active phased antenna arrays of different ranges are distributed over the body of a fighter,
He told the newspaper the general director of the Research Institute for Instrument Engineering named after V.V. Tikhomirova (NIIP) Yuri Bely.

"Belka" is made by AFAR technology. Traditional antenna replaces the so-called antenna array.

According to expert Alexey Leonkov, the distribution of radar elements on the surface of the Su-57 will provide a virtually complete overview of the air situation.

The pilot will see everything that is happening around him, in all directions. In modern aerial combat, when both air defense and aviation enemy, all-round visibility gives a big advantage. On the Su-57, the radar components are most likely located in the leading edge of the wing, above and below the fuselage, as well as in the tail. The use of antennas operating in different ranges practically negates all stealth innovations F-22 and F-35,
The expert noted.
Photos used:
PJSC "Company" Sukhoi "
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Imh
    Imh 26 February 2018 11: 35
    +8
    We will see. There is a lot of work with the Su-57, the Syrian business trip can add it (work). In general, it is interesting that Russia with the fifth generation will.
    1. Thrall
      Thrall 26 February 2018 11: 38
      +21
      Quote: IMH
      in general it’s interesting that Russia’s fifth generation will

      what purpose are you interested in? smile
      1. Anarchist
        Anarchist 26 February 2018 11: 40
        +9
        The main thing is that there should be a place on the control panel for all innovations! And so that the pilot does not lose his mind on the amount of information received ...
        1. dauria
          dauria 26 February 2018 12: 29
          +8
          And so that the pilot does not lose his mind on the amount of information received ..


          So this information is for the brains of the aircraft and to the general network. The pilot does not need most of it. The Americans are seriously considering the unmanned version of the F-35. Nowadays, even on a Chinese toy quadrocopter there is a flight controller with a 6-axis gyroscope, variometers, a compass and a 32-bit processor. This self-propelled guns and holds the toy, even with armless "control." Matchbox, price 500 rub. (There are "military" schemes in the Russian Federation, do not lament)
          1. Monos
            Monos 26 February 2018 13: 27
            +13
            Why mislead readers? We are not talking about “smart skin” at SU-57. 5 AFARs are installed on it: frontal, two - side view and two located in the wingtips. That is, the aircraft is able to "look" in all directions at the same time. In addition, there is a broadband radiation warning station capable of not only detecting the enemy radar signal, but also identifying and identifying noise-like signals, for example, the operation of the F-22 fighter radar in the so-called low probability interception mode. Plus, there is a well-developed system of optical sensors that allows you to discreetly detect, identify and measure the distance to an air target from any angle. Well, there are electronic warfare systems. But this has nothing to do with the so-called "smart skin".
            1. dauria
              dauria 26 February 2018 13: 45
              +6
              But this has nothing to do with the so-called smart skin.


              If we talk about films on MEMS technologies interspersed with electronics (artificial "skin"), which can recognize stress, flow, etc., and even respond to it wink - of course, there is no "smart skin". But then add that the adversary also does not have it. Single experiments with UAVs do not count.
              1. Monos
                Monos 26 February 2018 13: 50
                +7
                Quote: dauria
                But then add that the adversary also does not have it.

                Yes, you know, adversary somehow doesn’t care. And about those technologies that you are talking about, they are only in development.
                1. Kasym
                  Kasym 26 February 2018 16: 28
                  +4
                  Yesterday I read an article in “INOSMI.RU” “The transfer of Russian Su-57s to Syria is a dangerous farce”, that the avionics of the “trimmed configuration”, that there were no tests of the OMS, that there are no side antennas, the radar is “inefficient”, the engines are unreliable, India could not persuade to continue financing and she became interested in the F-35, etc.
                  The question arose: if it is so crude, then why did the Russian Federation send it to Syria? But how stupid is it to be in order to start testing in combat conditions? It seems to me the opposite. The aircraft must be as alert as possible in order to begin testing in such conditions.
                  By the way, they write that the Scientific Research Institute of Instrument Engineering named after Tikhomirova developed 7 radars and installed “trimmed” radars on three T-50-3 vehicles (4 and 5) (without side antennas, only front). And the production of the Su-57 is almost stopped, because Russia ordered only 12 cars, and 10 are ready. The system of "integrated modular avionics of combat complexes" is inefficient. "There is nothing besides the 30 mm cannons." If that were the case, then there is no point in sending a car to Syria. The stupidity of the author (Tom Cooper) rolls over. hi
                  1. Monos
                    Monos 26 February 2018 17: 32
                    +10
                    Oh, you would not read foreign media. Trash.
                    1. Kasym
                      Kasym 26 February 2018 17: 39
                      +3
                      It is interesting to know their point of view.
                      In principle, there are plenty of slops everywhere. That's why they and the media - give them sensations - and sometimes they sculpt "news" for distillation. hi
                      1. 1536
                        1536 26 February 2018 19: 05
                        +2
                        Marketing strategies are the same when selling broilers and boilers, as well as fighters.
        2. SERVER
          SERVER 26 February 2018 19: 45
          0
          so in 57th the technology of the second virtual pilot was used ... look at ifography
      2. shans2
        shans2 26 February 2018 16: 33
        +2
        with the goal of envy, they themselves do not even shine anything close, except for the wretched F-35, which is worse than the modernized F-16 ...
    2. KVU-NSVD
      KVU-NSVD 26 February 2018 11: 41
      +9
      We will see.
      Maybe for testing this equipment including go to Syria and surpassed? True, if the trials are found to be successful, it means "looking" at it in all its glory from the Penguins and Lizards was problematic winked
    3. Mar.Tirah
      Mar.Tirah 26 February 2018 11: 46
      +12
      A strange judgment? Do you think that Russia is a banana republic or what? What happened to the USA? F-35 participated in battles, intercepts? Will it be calm.
    4. Jackyun
      Jackyun 26 February 2018 11: 48
      +8
      At least one positive result has already been achieved. The stripes stopped using the F-22 in the Syrian campaign.
      1. okko077
        okko077 26 February 2018 12: 12
        +1
        What nonsense? On the serial F35, it’s all worth it .... The expert’s level is zero ... And the scientist tells a group of blondes or a correspondent interviewing .... What level of audience is this profanity for?
        1. Mestny
          Mestny 26 February 2018 13: 20
          +8
          The author talks about the SU-57, regardless of what it stands on the F-35.
        2. Herman 4223
          Herman 4223 26 February 2018 19: 29
          +1
          What is the f-35?
        3. Albert1988
          Albert1988 26 February 2018 19: 30
          +1
          Well, tell us about several radars on the F-45 ... There is also a separation of the signal source and receiving antennas in space, but such a scheme as on the Su-57 is not even there. On the other hand, ours didn’t take such a step far from a good life, but still you shouldn’t mix things up so rudely.
    5. gromoboj
      gromoboj 26 February 2018 14: 44
      +2
      Would you like to purchase? Penguins do not like something?
    6. andrson
      andrson 26 February 2018 15: 10
      +1
      Why will it come out? The plane is already there. It’s undergoing tests ... It would be good for EW to check on f35 and f22 with Israeli and NATO filling for defeating control and guidance systems, and to check the pilot’s pulse after bailout or collision.
  2. ancestors from Don
    ancestors from Don 26 February 2018 11: 43
    +9
    Quote: IMH
    We will see. There is a lot of work with S-57, the Syrian business trip can add it (work). In general, it is interesting that Russia with the fifth generation will.

    “C” is an abbreviation of the anti-aircraft complex, in the above privacy of the S-75 “phantoms” were also lost, and the SU-57 is an airplane for modern combat, so look and do not pander.
    1. Imh
      Imh 26 February 2018 11: 45
      +1
      Corrected. Pig was
    2. Imh
      Imh 26 February 2018 11: 46
      +3
      Do not worry about us tongue
      1. Thrall
        Thrall 26 February 2018 11: 47
        +5
        Quote: IMH
        Do not worry about us tongue

        Did something happen again? smile
      2. ancestors from Don
        ancestors from Don 26 February 2018 11: 51
        +5
        I worry about you in a good way, no offense!
  3. novel66
    novel66 26 February 2018 11: 53
    +5
    it's not that squirrel. what powders does not give peace?
  4. lance
    lance 26 February 2018 11: 58
    +2
    probably Israel is wondering if the “lens” on the su-57 will appear during operation, in other words, is the stealth coating blown off with sand?
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. Westfall
    Westfall 26 February 2018 12: 14
    +1
    It has already been discussed a hundred times that distributed antennas as an L-band in the wings are needed for state recognition purposes, communications, antennas in the tails are needed for warning of missile attacks, and not for detecting stealth aircraft.
    1. Genry
      Genry 26 February 2018 12: 40
      +5
      Quote: Westfshoke
      distributed antennas as an L-band in the wings are needed for state recognition purposes, communications, antennas in the tails are needed for warning of missile attacks, and not for detecting stealth aircraft.

      That is, stealth missiles can be detected, but the planes are “down”?
      And how is the state identification of aircraft without antennas in the wings?
      What grade in math did you have in high school?
      1. Mestny
        Mestny 26 February 2018 13: 22
        +6
        He does not yet know what grade. Studying for a long time before exams.
    2. Albert1988
      Albert1988 26 February 2018 19: 32
      +1
      Who discussed and when? There really are some shortcomings and a lot of things do not work yet, but that. what you write is the essence of complete ignorance of the issue.
  7. XXXIII
    XXXIII 26 February 2018 12: 24
    +5
    Su-57 received "smart trim"
    Normally so buried ... good

    The Ш121 system was developed by JSC "NIIP named after VV Tikhomirov" from Zhukovsky and includes the H036 radar and the electronic jamming system L402. Radar Н036 "Squirrel" includes five antennas with AFAR, three in the X-band and two in the L-band, which control the space at 270 degrees (135 degrees to the left and right of the axis of the aircraft). The use of the L-band in the operation of the air-to-air radar is the main means of detecting stealth aircraft in the T-50. According to the director of NIIP Yuri Belykh, the latest radar N036, released by the pilot production of the institute, was installed on a T-50-9 aircraft. Future aircraft will be equipped with radars manufactured by JSC "State Ryazan Instrument Plant".
    1. XXXIII
      XXXIII 26 February 2018 12: 30
      +7
      This is a sample - T-50-9 (tail number "059") - the first flight on April 24, 2017 + a set of airborne equipment for serial production (radar system of the weapon control system Sh121 + optoelectronic integrated system 101KS) ..... repeat
    2. Vita vko
      Vita vko 26 February 2018 14: 23
      +3
      Quote: XXXIII
      Normally packed like that.

      Moreover, the pilot there is clearly "superfluous." laughing
      Seriously, without a pilot it is easy to increase the allowable overloads and maneuverability at least twice, and the speed is up to 4 mach. Even if it detects such a nimble machine, not a single anti-aircraft defense will take it, for that it will “scare” itself to attack until the BK is completely consumed, and then give the control system to other weapons as long as there is enough fuel.
      1. XXXIII
        XXXIII 26 February 2018 16: 35
        +2
        Quote: Vita VKO
        Moreover, the pilot there is clearly "superfluous."
        Seriously, without a pilot it is easy to increase the allowable overloads and maneuverability at least twice, and the speed is up to 4 mach. Even if it detects such a nimble machine, not a single anti-aircraft defense will take it, for that it will “scare” itself to attack until the BK is completely consumed, and then give the control system to other weapons as long as there is enough fuel.
        lol
        Testing the secret weapons of the Moscow Region, even space objects are shot down .... laughing

  8. cniza
    cniza 26 February 2018 12: 29
    +5
    The use of antennas operating in different ranges practically negates all the stealth innovations F-22 and F-35,
    The expert noted.


    It is debatable how this is proved and who made the conclusion.
    1. Albert1988
      Albert1988 26 February 2018 19: 38
      +1
      Nothing is debatable - it uses a very effective reception - many radars - many signal sources and many antennas for its reception, and so the signal from, say, the nose radar, can be received by the antenna located at the leading edge of the wing (behind the pre-tag), such diversity the space of the receiver antenna and the signal source makes it possible to detect stealth very effectively. Infa from a friend who works in the NGO Instrument Engineering and is indirectly associated with this project)
    2. Herman 4223
      Herman 4223 26 February 2018 19: 42
      0
      Lets be better to spot them before, so better?
  9. Tatar 174
    Tatar 174 26 February 2018 13: 57
    +1
    And the pilot will see the situation around the plane like this? It seems that the first version of the two-medium atmosphere-space aircraft is being tested.
  10. dmitry.kashkaryow
    dmitry.kashkaryow 26 February 2018 21: 02
    +1
    Quote: Anarchist
    ponele

    PANEL
  11. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 27 February 2018 01: 35
    +1
    Therefore, everyone in the West has now begun to pay attention to our invisibility. In general, it is already necessary to close the sky of Syria for other people's aircraft.
    1. XXXIII
      XXXIII 27 February 2018 01: 57
      +1
      Quote: Anchonsha
      Therefore, everyone in the West has now begun to pay attention to our invisibility. In general, it is already necessary to close the sky of Syria for other people's aircraft.
      I would add what to close for those who unauthorized use of airspace for military purposes and without the consent of Damascus, and without a UN resolution. All who are in Syria should be asked to leave, diplomatically for a start. .... laughing
  12. VladVlad
    VladVlad 27 February 2018 08: 21
    0
    And this airplane, after the SU-27 redecoration, will have homing missiles that fire at those who creep up behind? Or at least a machine gun that shoots at the pursuers from behind.
  13. EvilLion
    EvilLion 27 February 2018 08: 40
    0
    And what's the news? Who cares, they already knew.