Military Review

How Putin, having destroyed the templates, achieved success in foreign policy

308
Russian President Vladimir Putin goes from one success to another. This can no longer be ignored and not recognized by almost all of his opponents. But the most interesting thing is that he has achieved this in the most non-standard and, as time has shown, in the most effective way for a modern politician.




Once, Dr. Goebbels claimed that from repeated repetition a lie would seem to people to be true. Unfortunately, it is this principle that the majority of politicians and journalists serving them use in their work today. It works and gives the desired effect in the short term, especially in circumstances where your opponents do not have the opportunity to convey the truth to people. But this is not suitable if we want to build an information struggle for the years ahead.

The example of the modern United States has become a textbook today. Not Russia, in fact, destroys their world hegemony, but their own lies and unprincipledness.



As we see on historical and modern examples, the reckoning always comes. Yes, a lie can neutralize something, for example, someone else's lie. But without the appropriate resources, it is extremely difficult to impose your lies on others, or rather impossible.

By the way, the same Dr. Goebbels, as we remember, ended badly.

Meanwhile, there is another way. For a start, let's compare two current politicians. Two presidents. They have not only completely different places in the international hierarchy, but also completely different approaches to work. What is very important for us is that we clearly understand the essence and effectiveness of the “other way”. And the most interesting thing is that both of these leaders started, having approximately the same starting positions.



Example one. President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko. Today, no one takes his words seriously. He was so many times caught in a lie that, even if once he begins to speak the truth, no one believes him anymore. But recently, the population of Ukraine gave him an unprecedented credibility for the country. Although not without a fly-over (and when it was different in Ukraine), Petro Poroshenko won the first round of the presidential election with the result of 54,7%. Today, he and his personal rating are a good and illustrative example in which political consultants explain to their wards how a current politician should not behave.

How Putin, having destroyed the templates, achieved success in foreign policy


Here is an example of a completely different kind. Russian President Vladimir Putin. When in 2000 for the first time he was elected to his (now almost permanent post), his starting positions did not differ much from Poroshenko’s position in 2014. Thanks to the administrative resource and the local understanding of the Russian elites, Vladimir Putin won the first round of elections (also a unique event for Russia at the time) with the result in almost 53%.

And then the story began, which is still admired. Putin went from victory to victory. His personal rating is still a unique global achievement and the envy of all, without exception, politicians of the world. And there is one thing that also distinguishes the Russian president from his colleagues, but on which none of them likes to draw attention. He does not lie to his people and is always responsible for the words spoken, even if it is not entirely convenient for him.

That is why Viktor Yanukovych today lives on Rublevka, and does not sit in the Lukyanovka pre-trial detention center.

The world has long been aware of this strange feature of the Russian president, which in the early years seemed rash. But today the image of a truthful and sincere person works both personally for Putin and for Russia. They are believed and this belief often helps to solve problems that could never be solved in another way.

So why did the lie, supported by colossal resources and thousands of "non-lived" votes, lose? And why did Putin not have another option to raise his country from the bottom, where she was sent by his false predecessors?



Everything is very simple. Lies can not be controlled, it is easy to get confused and become vulnerable. It is inconsistent and always contradictory. Yes, if everyone is lying, then the informational struggle is won by the one who has more than the very informational resource that Russia has not had at the turn of the millennia. That is why Putin did not have a single chance to win the fight with the West with the help of lies. If you are telling the truth, it is impossible to catch you in the contradictory position. You will be convincing, even if at the beginning your voice will be lost in the deceitful flow. That is how Putin won.

PS Why am I saying all this? Not to state a fact, but to solve a completely applied problem. Ukraine has built a total informational dome of lies, based on the most powerful resources not only of the official authorities, but also on the resources of the western agitprop. To destroy it with a lie is impossible. And, unfortunately, this is still not understandable by the majority of those who are leading an information war with the Kiev regime. Therefore, the result of this struggle is not very satisfying yet.
Author:
308 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 26 February 2018 06: 30
    +18
    Something is not visible that the United States would lose something because of its lies, at least for now request
    1. populist
      populist 26 February 2018 06: 44
      +44
      The author is sleeping and dreaming. What are such successes in foreign policy? sad There are many illustrations instead of arguments No. .
      1. Yurasumy
        26 February 2018 08: 14
        +38
        Dreams? You are definitely about me. For example, I see a difference in the situation, even 5 of a year ago and today. It is in foreign policy.
        1. Varyag_0711
          Varyag_0711 26 February 2018 10: 14
          +35
          Yurasumy Today, 08:14 ↑ New
          Dreams? You are definitely about me. For example, I see a difference in the situation, even 5 of a year ago and today. It is in foreign policy.
          Yes, they do not want to see anything. Such people always believe that everything should be done at the click of a finger, only this doesn’t happen in life, and even more so in politics.
          In general, it’s strange to listen to people who shout that Putin didn’t do anything, all his successes in politics are zilch and in general everything is bad. Well, what can I say? Many Western publications have several times recognized Vladimir Putin as the man of the year, probably this does not mean anything to them? And the fact that Putin sometimes receives a line-up from the heads of state is also not an indicator for them.
          So do not pay attention to them, in anticipation of the election, there will be more and more such displeased, but the dogs are barking, and the caravan is still moving. We would also have to put things in order inside the country, well, yes, and Moscow was not immediately built. We will deal with this.
          1. Varyag_0711
            Varyag_0711 26 February 2018 10: 31
            +25
            By the way, the president of the United States “a city on a hill and the first world economy” bowed to the Saudi king and even danced in front of him with a sword, but when the smell really fried, the Saudi king himself rode up to Putin personally. Probably for anti-Putinists this is also not an indicator. But for some reason I’m sure that if Putin wanted to, then the Saudi king Kalinka-Malinka would dance in the Kremlin, but this is not our method.
            1. yehat
              yehat 26 February 2018 12: 40
              +13
              what you describe is external tinsel, no more. apparently Putin is cool, but
              I would advise you to see a selection of his promises with dates - there are vidos on this topic. It seems to me that you will already have questions for our sun.
              1. Varyag_0711
                Varyag_0711 26 February 2018 12: 50
                +20
                From this "external tinsel", as you put it, the lives of millions of people around the world depend!
                Well, I never denied that there were a lot of questions for Putin. However, there will always be questions to the head of state, there will always be those who are not happy, it was, it is, it will be so, such is the nature of man. Just for someone, the glass will always be half empty, and for someone it is always half full.
                If you always look for one negative, then you will definitely find it, but you have to be objective, there is really a lot of negative, maybe for objectivity it is worth pointing out the positive? Or is there no such thing for Putin at all?
                1. yehat
                  yehat 26 February 2018 12: 57
                  +22
                  you know how dull compared to Putin Hollande was,
                  but under him, GDP did not shrink, there was no inflation or increase in interest rates on loans, there were no pension storms, and strikes almost stopped.
                  maybe your vision of pluses is too one-sided?
                  Of course, it's nice when the president looks cool, but at what cost?
                  If earlier we justified it with a heavy legacy, now it does not channel.
                  As stupid references to the "crisis" do not.
                  This deadline and perhaps the next Putin is obliged to show real improvements in the country, he had too much time and resources.
                  And I personally won’t be happy with excuses like "but we have the World Cup" or "Crimean bridge". I don’t give a damn about all this, I am waiting for real improvements, which are still not there. The country continues to plunge into a quagmire.
                  1. Varyag_0711
                    Varyag_0711 26 February 2018 13: 20
                    +22
                    yehat Today, 12: 57 ↑
                    Of course, it's nice when the president looks cool, but at what cost?
                    You know, this is your phrase, this is an exact tracing-paper with liberal cliches about Stalin! Like, yes, we won the war ... BUT AT WHAT PRICE ... yes we did the industrialization of the country ... BUT WHAT PRICE ... etc.
                    No matter what the price. We have been at war since 2014. The war is still economic, however, in Syria and the Donbass, it is quite real. And we must pay tribute to Putin that the real war has not yet spread to the territory of Russia.
                    I understand that for you this is also not an argument? If "YES", then I see no reason for further discussion.
                    I don’t give a damn about all this, I am waiting for real improvements, which are still not there.
                    So tear off the fifth point from the sofa and go to work, and not knock on the clave. I understand that it sounds rude, but it really is. Under a lying stone, water does not flow and no one will establish your life except yourself!
                    The country continues to plunge into a quagmire.
                    I repeat, I have heard this phrase for more than 15 years ...
                    Judging by the enterprise where I work, we went through the crisis in the middle of last year. Production volumes increased by the end of the year and surpassed the growth rate in 2013. I understand that one enterprise is not an indicator, but this situation is not only with us, but also among our competitors.
                    So drown in a quagmire and further, and we will work, you will look slowly and swim out.
                    1. yehat
                      yehat 26 February 2018 13: 38
                      +22
                      You know, this is your phrase, this is an exact tracing-paper with liberal cliches about Stalin! Like, yes, we won the war ... BUT AT WHAT PRICE ... yes we did the industrialization of the country ... BUT WHAT PRICE ... etc.
                      No matter what the price. We have been at war since 2014

                      about Stalin you are in vain, he, unlike Putin, was much more modest. And what was done with him was not an example anymore.
                      About the war. This is the favorite slogan of lobbyists of criminal monopolies - be patient, wait, consolidate, donate - we have a war! (by the way, it began much earlier than 2014), but should there be something other than a war? Personally, I’ve been sick of working for 20 years from morning to sunset.
                      I went on vacation 1 time during this time - you need to earn money. During this time, 4 ww2 the USSR would have managed to win, but patience still predicts the government 15 years ahead. Don't you think this is slightly illogical?
                      About the quagmire. You are either a demagogue or you don’t see the big picture. Our country continues to lose its capabilities. The balance and GDP are growing or falling, but the process is going one way. Where are our growth points besides the sale of resources and the military-industrial complex? There are almost none, and Germany has more than 70% of GDP.
                      In the USSR, resources accounted for about one fifth of foreign trade (which is also a bit much). Now what? Now it is about half, if not more.
                      Investments in scientific and technical progress, in improving the economy - are almost zero. For many years, socially significant items of expenditure have been continuously reduced - health care, education, pensions, scholarships, etc.
                      I am glad that in the ministries of the MSC, the army and among deputies, wages began to resemble a normal one, but about 70% of the population balances near or below the poverty line. And the country's potential is not Putin, not resources, not GDP, but people. That's what a quagmire is!
                      1. Varyag_0711
                        Varyag_0711 26 February 2018 13: 58
                        +24
                        Well, everything is clear. Objectively, I consider the further discussion pointless. I’m saying that for you the glass will always be half empty, and for me half full. You will seek out only the negative, which by the way I do not dispute and do not deny, but I, unlike you, try to see more than one solid negative around me and imagine finding positive aspects.
                        Your desire to live better will never come true, for the simple reason that you expect improvement in your life from Putin, Grudinin, a bald trait, but not from yourself. As a result, not a single power will suit you. Because now you probably have no place to work or pay little (again, the question is whether Putin sets your salary or all the same your leadership), and if the system changes (which is unlikely even in theory) then you will not be satisfied with another, well, for example, as an option you will be forced to work like under Stalin for rations or for workdays. And they will make you work really, not like you are working now, but at the machine or on the combine 12-14-XNUMX hours a day.
                        Comparing Stalin with Putin, for some reason, everyone overlooks one simple thing, the people worked hard. First, because it was necessary to rebuild the country after the civil and WWII, then urgent industrialization of the country was needed, then the strain of all the forces of the people, so as not to be completely destroyed by the Nazis, then again, restoration from ruin. Are you ready to work SO now? Say this is my demagoguery too? Will Grudinin come and do everything for you? Yes, no, no one will do anything for you, do not lie to yourself or to others.
                        So you need to start anyway with yourself as a loved one, you look and life will get better.
                        In the further discussion I do not see any point, but let me take a leave, I have the honor! hi
                      2. RUSOIVAN
                        RUSOIVAN 26 February 2018 18: 40
                        +6
                        Give Putin the authority of Stalin, and I assure you, there will be orders of magnitude greater, only you will be the first to howl.
                  2. Ascetic
                    Ascetic 26 February 2018 14: 20
                    +14
                    Quote: yehat
                    how dull compared to Putin Hollande was,
                    but under him, GDP did not shrink, there was no inflation or increase in interest rates on loans, there were no pension storms, and strikes almost stopped.

                    Yeah, they stopped ... just the opposite, his Labor reform led to mass protests and strikes, the unemployment rate not only did not decrease, it even increased. Let only slightly. As for the GDP, Hollande denoted 2,5% growth, but the growth did not exceed 1,4% during his reign ... in fact, if you take the average for the years of his reign nullas Hollande himself and the Socialist Compromisers, who, in words, are for the working people, but in fact serve the interests of globalists. Doesn't it remind anyone? No ... Grudinin is not one of those of those who are for the people ..
                    In vain you, Fedya! .. For me, my people are my relatives. I can’t live a day without thinking about the people! In the morning I smear a sandwich - Immediately thought: what about the people? And the caviar does not go into the throat, And the compote does not pour into the mouth! At night I get up at the window And stand all night without sleep - All worry about Rasea, How is it, poor, is she?
                    crying

                  3. your1970
                    your1970 26 February 2018 17: 17
                    +5
                    Quote: yehat
                    you know how dull compared to Putin Hollande was,
                    but under him, GDP did not shrink, there was no inflation or increase in interest rates on loans, there were no pension storms, and strikes almost stopped.
                    maybe your vision of pluses is too one-sided?
                    -and you did not try to look FROM THERE, on the other hand, so to speak?
                    "Madame and Monsieur!
                    A day ago, my Mr. Obama forbade me to supply Mistral to Russia ... did you hope for jobs in St. Nazaire?! For budget revenues?! Alas, you have to lick it. Moreover, we are forced to give Russia not only paid but also pay a fine
                    Not only that - we were also exposed as a laughing stock in the arms market - as incapable of selling YOUR own weapons and making money on it. In the same way they indicated our complete lack of independence and dependence on blacks from the USA "
                    unemployment increased slightly, the number of strikes at least tripled, GDP did not increase (as promised) - it even slightly eased up.
                    The era of Hollande's reign ...

                    Z.Y. But he rode a bicycle and public transport - if only with the people !!
                    Doesn't remind anyone ?????
                  4. serezhasoldatow
                    serezhasoldatow 26 February 2018 19: 52
                    +2
                    So you lived in France at that time? So why from such a wonderful country, with a wonderful president, returned to a totalitarian, backward?
                    1. your1970
                      your1970 26 February 2018 20: 39
                      +3
                      as soon as he was late for the inauguration due to the fact that he was traveling by public transport, it became clear to me what would happen next: word for word our EBN in the European version. The only difference was that it didn’t thump ....
                  5. Andrew67
                    Andrew67 27 February 2018 01: 51
                    +1
                    Well, since such a smart girl. Recall what was the interest rate of the Central Bank at the beginning of the presidency of GDP and what is it now ??? This is so - for starters
                2. New Year day
                  New Year day 26 February 2018 20: 28
                  +2
                  Quote: Varyag_0711
                  From this "external tinsel", as you put it, the lives of millions of people around the world depend!

                  and the life of millions of people in Russia do not care for him?
          2. Alexey Polyansky
            Alexey Polyansky 26 February 2018 19: 58
            +8
            Yes, Putin did well both in domestic politics and in foreign. Provides financial assistance to all countries. For the citizens of Russia created the conditions for complete physical destruction. (genocide). Forgave debts to many countries. For sick children in Russia they collect for treatment all over the world. He canceled taxes for his brothers as they suffered from sanctions. For citizens of Russia increases taxes. Down with Putin and his lads!
            1. Julio Jurenito
              Julio Jurenito 26 February 2018 21: 04
              +4
              It’s good to carry a blizzard, propaganda ... ist.
        2. Ascetic
          Ascetic 26 February 2018 10: 34
          +16
          Quote: yurasumy
          For example, I see the difference between the situation even 5 years ago and today. It is in foreign policy.

          Yuri. I always read your articles with interest, first in LiveJournal and then on Naspravdi, but still Putin and Poroshenko as politicians can be compared as warm to soft, for Russia will always be a Great Power, no matter who leads it, even frank traitors and compradors could not ruin and destroy. Ukraine will never become a full-fledged state, even if an honest and incorruptible patriot comes to power and equals the compradors \ following Putin’s example, in order to save the country he will have only one option: an alliance with Russia or joining it. Other options , like sitting on two chairs of Yanukovych will inevitably lead to collapse and chaos. Yours faithfully hi
        3. Cossack 471
          Cossack 471 27 February 2018 19: 37
          +2
          Why didn’t he achieve ANYTHING inside the country? You are our talented
      2. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 26 February 2018 08: 30
        +22
        Quote: populist
        The author is sleeping and dreaming.

        And it seems to me that you sleep and see liberal dreams, it's you!
        1. twviewer
          twviewer 26 February 2018 11: 44
          +12
          Quote: SRC P-15
          And it seems to me that you sleep and see liberal dreams, it's you!

          specially for you encore
          1. SRC P-15
            SRC P-15 26 February 2018 11: 55
            +18
            Quote: twviewer
            specially for you encore

            I’m on the drum, liberal is our president or not! For me, the main result: Putin lifted our country and army from its knees! And he continues to conduct politics in the same spirit. If he becomes president again, he will bring what he has begun to the end - will make Russia a great country again, which the whole world will reckon with.
            1. twviewer
              twviewer 26 February 2018 12: 22
              +22
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              I do not give a damn

              The Great Power today cannot set athletes under its own flag. Not on my knees, but on cancer. Prodigal children squandered the heritage of their ancestors and are happy to import buckets in the yard. Donned your collars and rejoice? Are happy? After us - at least a flood?
            2. vadsonen
              vadsonen 26 February 2018 15: 52
              +12
              Putin lifted our country and army from its knees!

              Any country is its people. The state itself has no other purpose, except to ensure the life of its citizens. We look at the data of Rosstat - 20 million (one in seven!) Below the poverty line.
              And this is not the merit of Obama or the State Department - this is the merit of Vova Solntseky, who put the condition of his friends at the forefront.
              Before Putin, Russia really was on its knees - but with a straight back. Now, judging by the standard of living in the country, it is also operating on its elbows.
              1. your1970
                your1970 26 February 2018 17: 20
                +2
                Quote: vadsonen
                Before Putin, Russia really was on its knees - but with a straight back.
                -with EBNe - not by the night be remembered ????? !!!!!!!!!!
            3. Alexey Polyansky
              Alexey Polyansky 26 February 2018 20: 01
              +1
              Putin raised "Your Country" (Russia was captured by a gang of criminals of mostly Jewish nationality), and not Russia from its knees and made Russian citizens cancer.
            4. New Year day
              New Year day 26 February 2018 20: 31
              +8
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              If he becomes president again, he will bring what he has started to the end - will make Russia a great country again, which the whole world will reckon with.

              and in which there will be no smart citizens, because many will die because of the "excellent" healthcare, and stupid people will leave the school and universities after the education reform
            5. KAV
              KAV 26 February 2018 22: 08
              +6
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              I’m on the drum, liberal is our president or not! For me, the main result: Putin lifted our country and army from its knees!

              Yes, it is useless to appeal the facts, useless to point to the results. They always have something to catch on. For, the PURPOSE of them is not in reasoning, but in the outrage of the existing president. Dialogues with them are the most waste of time and effort.
      3. twviewer
        twviewer 26 February 2018 11: 26
        +20
        Quote: populist
        There are many illustrations instead of arguments

        what arguments can there be if even a schoolchild knows that foreign policy is a continuation of domestic politics, and if there is a seam with domestic politics, then of course it’s brilliant in external steering — nothing else and the ring of friends is denser laughing
      4. vlad_vlad
        vlad_vlad 26 February 2018 11: 49
        +21
        Quote: populist
        The author is sleeping and dreaming. What are such successes in foreign policy? sad There are many illustrations instead of arguments No. .


        it is not a dream, but election campaigning. otherwise you’re not respecting the tsar’s merits and will not vote like that.
      5. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 26 February 2018 12: 07
        +4
        Quote: populist
        The author is sleeping and dreaming. What are such successes in foreign policy? There are many illustrations instead of arguments.
        Maybe then you will be able to list the failures in foreign policy? Just do not need about the Olympics - here the battle is not lost, but it is only just beginning.
        1. Gardamir
          Gardamir 26 February 2018 13: 44
          +9
          It’s just beginning.
          Shaw again?
        2. freddyk
          freddyk 26 February 2018 20: 01
          +10
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          Maybe then you will be able to list the failures in foreign policy?


          Ukraine is a complete failure. And our brothers really live there ... ... sisters, who have parents. And what about Syria, yes to me exactly on it. You do not need only slogans about the fight against terrorism. there are fighting for the interests of the gas and oil mafia.
          1. Nyrobsky
            Nyrobsky 26 February 2018 21: 51
            +4
            Quote: freddyk
            Ukraine is a complete failure. And our brothers really live there ... ... sisters, who have parents. And what about Syria, yes to me exactly on it. You do not need only slogans about the fight against terrorism. there are fighting for the interests of the gas and oil mafia.
            You see, each has its own criteria. I, for example, have deep Ukrina affairs, but Syrian affairs are very worried. Why? Yes, because the Ukrains, fucked by Poles and Turks, came to the Tsar to beat their foreheads and ask to be protected by the Empire. Do not refuse. And they gave birth to Mazepa, and fostered Bandera with Shukhevych. Union collapsed for KOVBASA and KAVU by voting against the preservation of the USSR. Here, they sold out for lace shorts, ignoring the fact that Russia for 20 years had swollen $ 200 billion in their well-being, on which their satiety was based all the years of "independence." Worse, now these shortcomings are ready to cut and sprinkle bleach on the Russian spirit, shaking a star-striped flag without taking into account the simple fact that the country on whose flag they pray is located thousands of kilometers from Kuev, and Russia is at arm's length, which being really nursing, she was gnawed by them to the elbow. Forgot the saying - You can’t bite your lactating hand. Now these shortfalls are given free. They themselves must interrupt their crayfish and repent. As for Syria, then everything is smooth and predictable. They were threatened, they turned, we helped.
            1. You Vlad
              You Vlad 27 February 2018 10: 04
              +1
              Quote: Nyrobsky
              Union collapsed for KOVBASA and KAVU by voting against the preservation of the USSR

              Lies hi
    2. Santa Fe
      Santa Fe 26 February 2018 07: 02
      +45
      By his policy, Putin not only did not split Europe, but he actually survived the NATO anabiosis, helped to strengthen its potential and bring NATO troops closer to the borders of the Russian Federation.

      2. Sanctions - beneficial and undoubtedly "useful for the economy"

      3. Russia has almost no allies, but the number of opponents has increased even among the once-friendly countries. There is every reason to say that Putin led to the isolation of Russia and to the complete loss of its trust. His, if I may say so, “policy”, Putin led to the emergence of hostile states along the perimeter of the Russian Federation.



      3. The current opponents are a direct result of the Kremlin’s policy. Four years ago, the war with Ukraine might have seemed like a delusion of a madman ... V. Soloviev, the Kremlin's spokesman, quite lucidly repeated this (see the video), but as it turned out he didn’t guess

      4. The “Novorossiya” project, a caricature chimera of the “Russian World”, on the whole, collapsed.

      5. Three-time "withdrawal of troops" from Syria. And the militants did not know that they were destroyed three times. 2 of the war - the slaughter continues, everything against everyone, the Yankees, PMCs, Kurds, the "legitimate Assad", the Turks, an-nusra, unpredictable news daily.

      6. It got to the Olympics without a flag

      Russian President Vladimir Putin, goes from one success to another. Foreign policy - his "fad"
      1. kepmor
        kepmor 26 February 2018 07: 24
        +34
        moreover, in splendid isolation ... without an ensemble ... that is, without us ...
        success for him ... problems for us ...
        1. Santa Fe
          Santa Fe 26 February 2018 07: 41
          +38
          Quote: kepmor
          success for him ... problems for us ...

          For each of these structures and people are ordinary citizens, labor collectives. In fact, all of us, 140 million people, have been listed - V. Putin on sanctions

          How to get into the Forbes list, hijacking billions over the hill - so is private property
          How to respond - GET HUGE COUNTRY
          1. dSK
            dSK 26 February 2018 08: 38
            +1
            Quote: Santa Fe
            STAND UP A HUGE COUNTRY

            Composer: A. Alexandrov
            Words: V. Lebedev-Kumach
            "Get up, the country is huge,
            Get up on a mortal battle

            With dark fascist power,
            With the cursed horde.
            Let the rage be noble
            Boils like a wave, -
            There is a people's war,
            Sacred War!
            Like two different poles,
            We are hostile in everything.
            We fight for light and peace
            They are for the kingdom of darkness. "
            1. dSK
              dSK 26 February 2018 08: 44
              +3
              Two days after the outbreak of the war, on June 24, 1941, the lyrics of the song were simultaneously published in the newspapers Izvestia and Krasnaya Zvezda "Holy war" signed by the famous Soviet poet and Stalinist laureate V. I. Lebedev-Kumach. Immediately after publication, composer A.V. Aleksandrov wrote music to her. On June 26, 1941, at the Belorussky Train Station, one of the groups of the Red Banner Red Army Song and Dance Ensemble of the USSR that had not yet gone to the front performed the song for the first time.
              Until October 15, 1941, “Holy War” was not widely performed, since it was believed that it had an overly tragic sound: it sang not about an imminent victory with “little blood”, but about a heavy mortal battle. And only from October 15, 1941, when the Wehrmacht already captured Kaluga, Rzhev and Kalinin, "Holy war" began to sound daily on All-Union Radio - every morning after the battle of the Kremlin chimes.
          2. Senior manager
            Senior manager 26 February 2018 10: 34
            +16
            Santa Fe Smart troll and nice to read. Almost everything is taken out of the context of events. IOC purchased-engaged amers. Tribalts, Outskirts are under external control (these are those that have become hostile to us). In Syria, the situation has changed - strengthened the group (in response to the actions of the FSA). Russia has not diminished its allies and has not increased, the Army and Navy are only strengthening. The Novorossiya project is in the process of being resolved and there is no need for Geyropu to split up, let them live as they want. Your post is designed for people who are illiterate, and who do not use their heads for their intended purpose. Of course, there are difficulties in Russia, but the FSA has no less. Trump voiced them more than once. Somehow you did not notice these moments. In short - pah on you (quote from the comedy "Ivan Vasilievich Changes the Profession"). There’s nothing to talk about. I apologize did not answer point by point.
            1. Varyag_0711
              Varyag_0711 26 February 2018 12: 10
              +9
              Senior Prophet Today, 10:34 ↑
              Santa Fe Smart troll and nice to read.
              In my opinion, you Kaptsova painfully greasy compliment about the "smart" weighed. A troll, he is also a troll in Africa.
              Although, again, I agree, this one is not really a scumbag, in contrast to the Maidan crouching.
            2. Cossack 471
              Cossack 471 27 February 2018 19: 55
              +1
              ST MISSIONER Of course the Americans have problems We would have their problems ... See the photo of the old woman in earlier comments
      2. dSK
        dSK 26 February 2018 07: 24
        +12
        Quote: Yuri Podolyaka
        It is impossible to destroy it with a lie.
        Pathological lies lead to degradation, mental illness. Diseases of the soul are practically untreatable medically.
        Speech by V. M. Molotov on the radio on June 22, 1941: "Our cause is right. The enemy will be defeated. Victory will be ours."
        1. Santa Fe
          Santa Fe 26 February 2018 07: 49
          +27
          His personal rating still a unique world achievement and the envy of all politicians of the world without exception.

          The most obvious indicator of his rating - the police, forced to protect the banners with Putinotherwise it’s not a good day
          https://www.opentown.org/news/174432/
          1. Loess
            Loess 26 February 2018 08: 08
            +21
            Quote: Santa Fe
            police forced to guard banners with Putin, otherwise the day will not stand without acts of vandalism

            And the photo where the tank is under the banner was not found? It would have looked more impressive.
            1. You Vlad
              You Vlad 26 February 2018 08: 44
              +12
              Quote: Less
              And the photo where the tank is under the banner was not found? It would have looked more impressive.

              Don't be strict repeat They only study yes
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. vovanpain
              vovanpain 26 February 2018 08: 53
              +11
              Quote: Less
              And the photo where the tank is under the banner was not found? It would have looked more impressive.

              And on the fig, put a picture of a police car coming for lunch next to the banner, throw a bunch of dung on the fan that's all
              Santa Fe
              1. Stas157
                Stas157 26 February 2018 09: 54
                +19
                Quote: vovanpain

                And on the fig, put a picture of a police car coming for lunch next to the banner, throw a bunch of dung on the fan

                The police there are not just standing there. There’s a well-known video about this, type in YouTube, and you will have no doubt that it is rigged.
                People simply cannot otherwise express their indignation with this oligarchic power! Even so, to take the soul ... This is a real assessment of Putin's activities over the long 18 years. There was a chance to upgrade the economy to excess revenues from expensive oil, but all these fabulous wealth (a trillion dollars) were taken abroad by Putin's friends.
                1. SPACE
                  SPACE 26 February 2018 10: 11
                  +10
                  Quote: Stas157
                  The police there are not just standing there. There’s a well-known video about this, type in YouTube, and you will have no doubt that it is rigged.

                  Without any doubts laughing Well, of course, where did u fool there may be doubts ?? Of course, what is rigged. In their right mind and solid memory, which of the normal ones have the time and desire to fight the poster? People? Rather dumb morons. I won’t be surprised if it turns out that this is really rigged, there are a lot of random video before the election.
                  1. Stas157
                    Stas157 26 February 2018 10: 36
                    +16
                    Quote: SPACE
                    People? Rather dumb morons. I won’t be surprised if it turns out that this is really rigged, there are a lot of random video before the election.

                    Yes, you watch the video than guessing! There, police cars at EVERY Putin’s poster in the city stand "completely by accident."
                    1. Stas157
                      Stas157 26 February 2018 10: 44
                      +18
                      Here is another video.
                2. Ascetic
                  Ascetic 26 February 2018 13: 52
                  +10
                  Quote: Stas157
                  The police there are not just standing there. There’s a well-known video about this, type in YouTube, and you will have no doubt that it is rigged.

                  Firefighters and police do not need to wash and protect Putin’s banners, because this is the property of advertising companies, which they themselves conscientiously and promptly maintain in good condition, regardless of what is displayed on them
                  . LAW ON ADVERTISING 19. OUTDOOR ADVERTISING AND INSTALLATION OF ADVERTISING CONSTRUCTIONS
                  1. Distribution of outdoor advertising ... is carried out by the owner of the advertising structure, which is the advertising distributor, in compliance with the requirements of this article. Owner of an advertising structure (individual or legal entity) - the owner of the advertising structure or another person with a property right to the advertising structure or the right to own and use the advertising structure on the basis of an agreement with its owner.

                  All banners are paid from the election funds of presidential candidates. All outdoor advertising and its placement are regulated by a number of laws. There is GOST GOST R 52044-2003. State standard of the Russian Federation. Outdoor advertising on roads and territories of urban and rural settlements. General technical requirements for outdoor advertising. Placement rules (adopted and enforced by Resolution of the Gosstandart of Russia dated 22.04.2003 N 124-st) (as amended on 29.02.2016), which governs all advertising companies.Responsibility for the preservation, damage, destruction ... is the owner of the advertising products - advertising company
                  Quote: Stas157
                  Even so take the soul.

                  Take this soul to Charon or the angels ... Shkolota rules, now petty hooliganism becomes a feat. so .. bortsunami with regime laughing
            4. Serg65
              Serg65 26 February 2018 11: 13
              +7
              Quote: Less
              where is the tank under the banner

              If you consider that Santa Fe is Oleg Kaptsov, then you need to ask not about the tank under the banner, but about the super linkor with 3-meter armor under the banner! wink
          2. BAI
            BAI 26 February 2018 10: 24
            +10
            The most obvious indicator of His rating is the police, which are forced to guard banners with Putin, otherwise the day will not be idle without acts of vandalism

            This is a traffic police car. She has nothing to do with security. No need to juggle.
            1. Varyag_0711
              Varyag_0711 26 February 2018 10: 49
              +17
              BAI Today, 10:24 ↑
              This is a traffic police car. She has nothing to do with security. No need to juggle.
              And it doesn’t matter to them, the main thing is shit for a fan. In our city, sometimes an interception plan is sometimes announced, whether it’s a training one, or it’s true that they are catching someone, so photographing the police in bronics and spheres, with machine guns outweighed by someone’s banner will not be difficult. And then you can spread it under any sauce, there would be a desire. As they say, a pig will find dirt everywhere!
              1. your1970
                your1970 26 February 2018 17: 30
                +2
                Quote: Varyag_0711
                BAI Today, 10:24 ↑
                This is a traffic police car. She has nothing to do with security. No need to juggle.
                And it doesn’t matter to them, the main thing is shit for a fan. In our city, sometimes an interception plan is sometimes announced, whether it’s a training one, or it’s true that they are catching someone, so photographing the police in bronics and spheres, with machine guns outweighed by someone’s banner will not be difficult. And then you can spread it under any sauce, there would be a desire. As they say, a pig will find dirt everywhere!
                - no, you can prettier - take a picture of the police with machine guns and in armor plates under the banner of Grudinin or Yavlinsky and start shouting - that the police do not give ordinary people the agitation of the people's representatives
              2. freddyk
                freddyk 26 February 2018 20: 17
                +3
                Listen, if you don’t want to see something, this does not mean that it is not. A wave of vandalism swept across the country in relation to banners with Putin. This is stupid to deny. No wonder the police guard them.
          3. Ascetic
            Ascetic 26 February 2018 11: 44
            +9
            Quote: Santa Fe
            the police, forced to guard banners with Putin, otherwise the day will not normally stand idle
            https://www.opentown.org/news/174432/

            Well, what source do not refer? And the original source of Radio Liberty, speaking Trump's words frank fake news
        2. dSK
          dSK 26 February 2018 08: 02
          0
          "Then the King will say to those right side Him: come, blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: for I hungered, and you gave me to eat; thirsty, and you made me drink; I was a wanderer, and you accepted Me; was naked, and you clothed me; was sick, and you visited me; I was in prison, and you came to Me. Then the righteous will answer him: Lord! when did we see you hungry and fed you? or thirsty, and got drunk? when did we see you as a wanderer and accepted you? or naked and dressed? when did we see you sick, or in prison, and came to you? And the King will answer them: Verily I say unto you: since you did this to one of these smaller My brothers, you did this to Me. " (Matthew 25: 34-40)
        3. dSK
          dSK 26 February 2018 08: 13
          +1
          Pathological lie leads to degradation

          "Then he will say to those who left side: come from me, damned, into eternal fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: for I hungered, and you did not give me to eat; thirsty, and you did not give me water; He was a wanderer, and they did not receive me; He was naked, and they did not clothe Me; sick and in prison, and did not visit me.
          Then they will answer him: Lord! when did we see you hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not serve you? Then he will answer them: Verily I say unto you, Thus just as you did not do this to one of these lesser ones, you did not do this to Me.
          And these will go into eternal torment, and the righteous into eternal life. "
          (Matthew 25: 34-40)
          1. dSK
            dSK 26 February 2018 12: 08
            +1
            And these will go into eternal torment

            "Then Judas, who betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, and repented, returned thirty pieces of silver to the high priests and elders, saying: I have sinned by betraying innocent blood. They said to him: What do we care? take a look yourself. And throwing the pieces of silver in the temple, he went out, went and strangled.(Matthew 27: 3-5)
      3. You Vlad
        You Vlad 26 February 2018 08: 08
        +7
        Quote: Santa Fe
        Santa Fe

        It remains only to ask you: what do you smoke? yes
        1. Ascetic
          Ascetic 26 February 2018 11: 45
          +9
          Quote: You Vlad
          It remains only to ask you: what do you smoke?

          It is necessary to ask the compilers of such manuals and fake cards with Radio Liberty wassat
          1. You Vlad
            You Vlad 26 February 2018 15: 50
            +5
            Quote: Ascetic
            It is necessary to ask the drafters of such manuals and fake cards from Radio Liberty

            This is not Radio Liberty. It was projected here by Stanislav. hi There is an author, it turns out then, well, it’s a fake, he brought us freedom laughing
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. SPACE
        SPACE 26 February 2018 09: 32
        +8
        Quote: Santa Fe
        2. Sanctions - beneficial and undoubtedly "useful for the economy"
        3. Russia has practically no allies, but the number of opponents has grown even among the once friendly countries. There is every reason to say that Putin led to the isolation of Russia and to the complete loss of credibility for it. His, so to speak, “politics”, Putin led to the emergence of hostile states on the perimeter of the Russian Federation ...

        And here is another colleague of yours, also a fighter with rezhim, writes something else ...
        Quote: Dante
        What could be done? you ask. Well, for example, it was necessary to enter Syria not in the 5th year of the civil war, but in the second. Take not only the Crimea, but all of eastern Ukraine.

        You would at least decide what you need, you have a cognitive dissonance fool
      6. Persian
        Persian 26 February 2018 09: 44
        +8
        Everything to the point. And the complete failure of domestic policy, but here you can write off the dimon.
      7. BAI
        BAI 26 February 2018 10: 21
        +7
        Sanctions are beneficial and undoubtedly “beneficial to the economy”

        Undoubtedly:
        1. Industry, and especially agriculture, at least started to produce something. At least something is always better than nothing.
        2. Banks were denied access to cheap loans and they were forced to leave the speculative sector in the real economy. If access to cheap loans remained, all banks would play to lower the ruble and the dollar would cost 200 rubles, or even more (for 1000 or more have already passed).
        3. At least some return of capital has begun. It used to be from the word "completely."
        1. groks
          groks 26 February 2018 11: 32
          +6
          1. What exactly started to produce? The site is not to be offered the name of a St. Petersburg Satanist Jew.
          2. And what are they doing in this almost completely empty sector?
          3. Why? The first thing the search engine gave in combination. https://regnum.ru/news/2368870.html
        2. Ascetic
          Ascetic 26 February 2018 14: 02
          +8
          Quote: BAI
          3. At least some return of capital has begun. It used to be from the word "completely"

          The process of the return of capital, in different years removed from the country, has already begun. Since the beginning of this year, Russian financial institutions have recorded receipts of funds from abroad in record high volumes.

          Yevgenia Tiryukova, head of Sberbank Private Banking’s division, said that in January, the inflow increased three times - compared to the same period in 2017. According to her, we are talking about hundreds of millions of dollars that Sberbank customers transfer from England, Switzerland and Austria.
          The management company Alfa Capital also reported an almost four-fold increase in customer inflows. In January and the first days of February, more than 11 billion rubles were received from foreign banks. “This is an absolute historical record,” the general director of the company, Irina Krivosheeva, told RIA Novosti.

          Countdown. Why billions are returning to Russia
          This is only the first signs, although laws on capital amnesty were adopted and modified repeatedly ... apparently the oligarchs do not get through the brain but in another place ... apparently some have already been tormented by swallowing dust
          1. Antivirus2k
            Antivirus2k 26 February 2018 17: 34
            +11
            Are you kidding now? You really don’t understand why in January part of the capital returned? Because amnesty? Ahahaha. And what did she not work before, she was announced long ago !? Pssst, I’ll tell you a secret. Lists of sanctioned billionaires, which the United States did during this period, did not hint at anything to you? No. Well then, believe in "Putin's power." Well, the glory of the United States, probably because of their stupidity a little bit back. But, I think, Naebulin will not fail and pump into the US economy all that they have lost, in five times, of course.
      8. Ascetic
        Ascetic 26 February 2018 11: 15
        +10
        Quote: Santa Fe
        really revived NATO, which was in suspended animation, helped to strengthen its potential and bring NATO troops closer to the borders of the Russian Federation.

        Well, yes, before writing such nonsense, study the materiel and not the State Department manuals. 1999 The 50th NATO Summit the new strategic concept of the bloc, which actually legitimized “humanitarian intervention” and NATO’s move beyond Article 5 of the Washington Treaty. Now the alliance has secured the right to use force outside its borders. In addition, at this summit, three countries of Central and Eastern Europe (Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic) formally became members of the North Atlantic Alliance, the so-called Visegrad group.
        As for NATO, the process of its expansion is ongoing regardless of what system is in Russia and who is in power. The first three waves occurred before the collapse of the Soviet Union, in 1952 \ Greece and Turkey \, 1955 \ Germany \ and 1982 \ Spain \ . About 1999 I already said above, then 2004. Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Estonia, Putin’s Munich speech is three more years! 2009 Albania and Croatia, 2017 - Montenegro.
        Quote: Santa Fe
        2. Sanctions - beneficial and undoubtedly "useful for the economy"

        Sanctions have always existed against us. against the USSR and in the 30s. after the Soviet-Finnish war, in 1948 Restrictions on exports to the USSR and the socialist countries, then the Korean War, pipes for the Druzhba oil pipeline, the Jackson-Venik amendment, the grain embargo, the Reagan oil embargo, do not forget about COCOM. created in 1949, the main task of organizing the implementation of the strategy “Controlled technological backlog”. Sanctions against Russia are mainly imposed for Crimea, let's give Crimea back for promises to lift sanctions? Therefore, sanctions will always be. Until Russia, according to the plan of the Anglo-Saxons, will not be divided into small vassalities and will not lose its sovereignty. While in power, Putin will never happen.
        1. Ascetic
          Ascetic 26 February 2018 11: 19
          +11
          Quote: Ascetic
          Putin led to the isolation of Russia and the complete loss of her credibility. His, so to speak, “politics”, Putin led to the emergence of hostile states on the perimeter of the Russian Federation.

          See Clause 1 on NATO Enlargement

          The war with Ukraine four years ago could seem like crazy nonsense ...

          Five years ago, I told our Svidomo non-brothers on the site \ you can see the archive of comments \. that the policy of banderizing Ukraine will lead to a civil war and the return of Crimea, for NATO Crimea is a military-strategic defeat of Russia, then the Caliphate in Syria. withdrawal from BV, Afghanistan-Wed Asia-Caucasus and the war with the Caliphate on our land.
          So I had crazy ravings? Then you can congratulate you on congruent dissonance.
          4. The “Novorossiya” project, a caricature chimera of the “Russian World”, on the whole, collapsed.

          It did not collapse, but was “frozen” for objective reasons of a political and military nature. the main of which you can’t wage a war on two fronts, even a proxy ..

          2 years of war - the carnage continues, everything is against everyone, the Yankees, PMCs, Kurds, "legitimate Assad", Turks, an-nusra, unpredictable news daily.

          It will be as it will be, losing Syria like death ... see paragraph 3
          6. It got to the Olympics without a flag

          This is just an indicator of the weakness of the arrogant Saxons. Hysteria and minor dirty tricks will continue until .. see p.2

        2. You Vlad
          You Vlad 26 February 2018 16: 08
          +6
          Quote: Ascetic
          Therefore, sanctions will always be. Until Russia, according to the plan of the Anglo-Saxons, will not be divided into small vassalities and will not lose its sovereignty.

          Which Putin prevented in the 90s, when literally a little bit remained before this scenario, for which the Anglo-Saxons do not like him! I think Putin has no other way out for his survival than to make Russia great, sovereign and independent! in our country, it’s pro-Western, the West will demand his head and he will get it! They don’t forgive when someone destroys their plans! And there’s always an article for him!
          1. groks
            groks 26 February 2018 16: 30
            +8
            Which Putin prevented in the 90s
            This is when he worked under Sobchak?
            When the change of power in our country to pro-Western
            She is now completely pro-Western.
            1. your1970
              your1970 26 February 2018 18: 00
              +2
              Quote: groks
              Which Putin prevented in the 90s
              This is when he worked under Sobchak?
              When the change of power in our country to pro-Western
              She is now completely pro-Western.
              that’s all the tantrums of the Western (!!!) media about the “bad Putin!”, “Russian Tsar”, “New Empire!” etc. is a lie?
              Strange ...
              for some reason it seemed to me that THEM don't like Putin’s policy ...
              1. groks
                groks 27 February 2018 07: 47
                +1
                If you scare a good scary Putin, you can perfectly sell the F-35. And these are such grandmothers !!!
      9. yehat
        yehat 26 February 2018 12: 45
        +6
        to all that you said, I will give only one fact - the Hungarians, when they voted for one of the anti-Russian laws in the EU, said in a private conversation: yes, we voted against the Russian Federation, but could we vote differently? We would not be allowed.
        Isolation of Russia is a policy, but not of Putin, but a policy of isolation of the Russian Federation, similar to that carried out by England against Germany, and earlier, by Napoleon against England.
        I advise you to read the story at least sometimes to see what is happening.

        And I have a question - when the Russian Federation was more alone - when did Yeltsin "be friends" with everyone, or now?
      10. raw174
        raw174 26 February 2018 13: 46
        +7
        Quote: Santa Fe
        By his policy, Putin not only did not split Europe, but he actually survived the NATO anabiosis, helped to strengthen its potential and bring NATO troops closer to the borders of the Russian Federation.

        Comrade, well this is a consequence of the fact that NATO began to see a buildup of force in Russia. We are becoming stronger, a competitor, respectively, is forced to strengthen too ... You can disperse the army and NATO will again fall into suspended animation, or even we will join it.
        Quote: Santa Fe
        Sanctions are beneficial and undoubtedly “beneficial to the economy”

        Yes, sanctions have a beneficial effect on some sectors, such as agriculture. The share of non-resource budget revenues is increasing, albeit not radically, but increasing.
        Quote: Santa Fe
        Russia has virtually no allies

        And when were you? Yes, situational, tactical alliances were and are, but there were no strategic ones!
        Quote: Santa Fe
        The war with Ukraine four years ago could seem like crazy nonsense

        Here Ukraine yes, they missed, there are no questions.
        Quote: Santa Fe
        The Novorossiya project, the caricature chimera of the Russkiy Mir, as a whole, collapsed.

        The project, as it sounds ... This is not the Russian brainchild, yes, we support Donbas, but we did not start the war, Russia did not abandon its own, it helps people in every way, this is a worthy step of Putin, we did not get involved in the war, but we support people.
        Quote: Santa Fe
        Three "withdrawal of troops" from Syria.

        You will be surprised, but we are in the SAR for the next 50 years ...
        Quote: Santa Fe
        2 years of war - the massacre continues,

        And it will continue, the SAR is a new battlefield, where we are opposing ourselves to the west, so far very successfully ...
        Quote: Santa Fe
        Came to the Olympics without a flag

        Again, this is not a failure! We play in a foreign field by the rules of others. IOC is a 100% Western company and will dance to the tune of the West, reaching the point of absurdity. The West cannot crush us with an army, without unacceptable damage, our economy was torn to shreds, but international analysts once again raised our attractiveness ratings, everything is functioning, the economy is gradually emerging from the crisis, they decided to hit the sport ...
        I believe that the Olympics should have been officially boycotted, and the athletes should go “personalities."
        In general, under tremendous pressure, Putin is holding a blow. I am not ashamed of the president.
        1. You Vlad
          You Vlad 27 February 2018 09: 55
          +1
          Quote: raw174
          Comrade, well this is a consequence of the fact that NATO began to see a buildup of force in Russia. We are becoming stronger, a competitor, respectively, is forced to strengthen too ... You can disperse the army and NATO will again fall into suspended animation, or even we will join it.

          Please complete your opinion by inserting such names there: Carthage, the Caribbean crisis, the Cold War, missile defense in Europe, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Vietnam, Gr
          Uziya, Ukraine! hi
      11. gsev
        gsev 26 February 2018 23: 47
        +2
        I remember the 90s. A friend worked in a store whose owner was a Syrian. He told me that the Syrians then believed that they were able to seize Russia, then there were so stupid rulers in it. At the beginning of Putin’s reign, it was believed that Russia would come to economic chaos and that its population would not die of starvation, its territory would begin to move to more successful neighbors. That is, it was expected that the Russian people are doomed to extinction. The IOC is treading Russia, but the skater An, and the fifteen-year-old Alina, and the hockey team, and Putin, with their worthy behavior, entered sports history as multiple Olympic champions. Sanctions turned to the healing of Russia. The population of Crimea escaped genocide. The development of Islamic banditry has been dealt a powerful blow. The Syrian state is not destroyed. The civil war in Xinjiang, the war in Korea, and aggression against Iran were suppressed.
    3. You Vlad
      You Vlad 26 February 2018 08: 11
      +11
      Quote: Spartanez300
      Something is not visible that the United States would lose something because of its lies, at least for now

      Of course I haven’t lost anything! Only the world has become multi-polar and an alternative financial center in China is being created, and everything is fine for them yes
    4. businessv
      businessv 26 February 2018 17: 40
      +2
      Quote: Spartanez300
      Something is not visible that the United States would lose something because of its lies, at least for now

      The largest debtor in the world, he, the World Hegemon, cannot visually lose anything, this is his axiom! For his losses, the one who created them, or the designated culprit, must be punished. This is achieved in ANY way, so there are so many inconsistencies in the statements and actions of US officials. If the States lose something, then immediately and forever, but while they themselves print the money for which they exist, they are unlikely to face it. wink
  2. 210ox
    210ox 26 February 2018 06: 44
    +11
    Found with whom to compare ... With a drunken pigman ... And about Yanukovych .. He’d better sit, True in Donetsk ..
  3. zyablik.olga
    zyablik.olga 26 February 2018 06: 52
    +40
    Yes, on reading this opus, the impression is frank. wassat
    I especially liked this:
    Putin went from victory to victory ... He does not lie to his people and is always responsible for the words spoken, even if it is not at all convenient for him.

    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 26 February 2018 07: 03
      +3
      A certain eccentric is still fighting for the truth,
      True, in the speeches of his truth on a broken penny
      Pure truth will triumph over time
      If it does the same as a clear lie.
    2. yehat
      yehat 26 February 2018 12: 50
      +2
      I, too, am dissatisfied with Putin’s promise, but you attribute too much to him.
      gross domestic product would be doubled if not for the greed of the monopolies. Putin had no influence on this.
      There were other possible ways, but again the lobbyists of the monopolies took care to close them.
      interest rate on loans - Putin announced official reports.
      as for the acquisition of housing - I will tell you so, if they wanted to, half could buy.
      Yes, it is much more difficult than an American, but it was achievable.
      well, etc. I would like to remind you that it is necessary to separate the capabilities of the president and the government.
    3. businessv
      businessv 26 February 2018 17: 56
      +5
      Quote: zyablik.olga
      Yes, on reading this opus, the impression is frank.

      It’s hard to argue with a person who is convinced of anything, but you can pick up the materials of at least Rosstat and compare which country the GDP has accepted and what it is now, the amount of gold reserves, the affiliation of hydrocarbon deposits, etc. At least this: " Debt has decreased by 22,7 times during this time, from 69,1% of GDP in 2000 to 3,1% in 2016. Inflation was also defeated, while in 2000 it was 20,2%, then in 2006, for the first time in the recent history of Russia, it fell below 10%, and as of December 4, 2017, it reached a record 2,5% in annual terms. "
      You just can’t blame everything, as the liberals do, it’s not so bad! And here's a little more: "During the reporting period, our country's international reserves have grown more than 30 times - from $ 12 to $ 378 billion.",
      The material from which the figures as a whole are taken is rather an ode, but if you discard the lyrics, the numbers are correct.

      Source: https://politikus.ru/articles/103500-kak-izmenila
      s-strana-za-18-let-prezidentstva-putina.html
      Politikus.ru
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 26 February 2018 18: 19
        +10
        the numbers are correct.

        During Putin’s stay in power in Russia:
        Housing and communal services tariffs increased by 20 times or more
        The number of dollar millionaires has grown 16 times, and their combined
        capital - 37 times.
        Housing has risen in price by 7,8 times
        Services increased 6,8 times
        Travel by public transport went up 5 or more times
        The volume of corruption increased 5 times
        Food imports grew 4 times
        Gasoline rose 3,5 times
        The annual export of capital grew 3,5 times
        Non-food products rose 2,5 times
        The number of officials increased by 1,8 times
        The share of oil and gas exports grew 1,5 times
        The ratio of 10% of the richest to 10% of the poorest increased by 15%
        Everything grows and rises in price.
        And at least something has decreased?
        Residents of Russia became 3,3 million less.
        1. businessv
          businessv 26 February 2018 23: 23
          +1
          Quote: Gardamir
          During Putin’s stay in power in Russia:

          Again, for the sake of correctness, indicate the% loss from inflation, how much specifically applies to numbers, and not to "times". And then, all that you indicated is the flaws of the system, not the President. It is not known how we would live if the rules were, say, Chubais, or Yavlinsky. No one argues that the system needs to be changed, but everything has its time.
          1. Gardamir
            Gardamir 27 February 2018 08: 18
            +3
            flaws in the system, not the President.
            Didn't the president create this system?
        2. turbris
          turbris April 21 2018 10: 38
          0
          You forgot to indicate GDP and salaries, the increase in the number of inhabitants in Russia due to the annexation of Crimea, and much more. But under the slogan "Everything grows and rises in price" this is not necessary, when you finish publishing this nonsense, expect that bloggers will not be able to publish completely different digits?
    4. Giants
      Giants 26 February 2018 22: 37
      +1
      Quote: zyablik.olga
      I especially liked this:

      I liked the photo of Putin. On the first one, a man who looks like Putin, on the second - the real Putin. Even if we assume that there was a plastic surgery, I can’t recall that Putin was out of the media for several weeks, he simply disappeared. And after plastic surgery it is necessary. I hope no one will argue? Here is the real Putin in Munich 2007
  4. XII Legion
    XII Legion 26 February 2018 07: 19
    +28
    As for success anywhere a big question
    But that's alright
    It's time to move on to an effective domestic policy - yes, there probably is no longer any strength or desire
  5. Alex66
    Alex66 26 February 2018 07: 24
    +24
    With strangers, Putin behaves like a gentleman, but with his people? It seems that the problems are solved only for the people, housing and communal services are growing, medicine is getting more expensive, education is getting more expensive, they do not want to pay pensions. If Putin has one thing for strangers and another for his own, then we won’t last long, we will fall apart like the USSR.
    1. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 26 February 2018 12: 33
      +12
      Quote: Alex66
      With strangers, Putin behaves like a gentleman, but with his people? It seems that the problems are solved only for the people, housing and communal services are growing, medicine is getting more expensive, education is getting more expensive, they do not want to pay pensions. If Putin has one thing for strangers and another for his own, then we won’t last long, we will fall apart like the USSR.

      By. Russia -1998 - below the poverty line of 80% of Russians. Russia -2017 - below the poverty line of 20%. Pensions are paid with indexation. Secondary education is free. Medicine is free with a choice - you want to go for a fee. At the same time, we must take into account the fact that socialism rested in Bose 25 years ago, and thanks to such whiners who did not like the “Soviets”, we now live under capitalism with a “human face”. Under "thoroughbred" capitalism with an "animal grin", nothing is provided for free at all. Do you want to live worse? Let's have another revolution ....
      1. yehat
        yehat 26 February 2018 14: 39
        +9
        Russia -1998 - below the poverty line of 80% of Russians. Russia -2017 - below the poverty line of 20%

        in fairness, this situation has changed only because Putin insisted on paying taxes by "business". And this happened already by 2004. But you lied about 20%. At least 40% of families now fall under the definition of “below the poverty line” and many more are very close. And what has changed from 2004 to 2018? I did not see any major changes.
        As a whole, social guarantees became much less, maternal capital would be a plus, but not everything is smooth with it.
        and as for the picture I’ll clarify - 300 varieties of shit sausages and 200 channels that broadcast shit.
      2. businessv
        businessv 26 February 2018 18: 06
        +4
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        Under "thoroughbred" capitalism with an "animal grin", nothing is provided for free at all. Do you want to live worse? Let's have another revolution ....

        Exactly! Bravo! smile
  6. Nix1986
    Nix1986 26 February 2018 07: 29
    +29
    The author is well done, licks at 5+. What are these successes in foreign policy? Sanctions from the USA and the European Union? The outflow of capital has not gone away, the crisis in the economy, health and the pension system? The request of the administration, Well, do not miss even though you are electoral idiots.
    1. Yurasumy
      26 February 2018 08: 16
      +10
      You laugh in vain. Just sanctions speak of success. By 90, no one announced them.
      1. Nix1986
        Nix1986 26 February 2018 08: 23
        +19
        The doctor did not know how to cure his leg, he bought exams at the university, but the decision came by itself - gangrene began, amputation needed to be done. Success, the patient will no longer bother the leg.
        1. yehat
          yehat 26 February 2018 14: 45
          +3
          empty sarcasm. in foreign policy, despite the isolation, I personally see the result of success, except for Ukraine. There, the failure of diplomatic and undercover work was simply catastrophic, although more than the necessary resources were allocated and this is the problem of personnel, not politics. The Russian Federation needs to defend its interests. Sooner or later they will put up with this.
          real and much more problems inside - the Gaidar Sabbath is still ongoing, the monopolies are still doing what they want, the overwhelming majority of the population is actually enslaved by economic and administrative conditions. (when they will cancel their ID and passport, a bunch of other similar anachronisms ???)
      2. Gardamir
        Gardamir 26 February 2018 09: 17
        +16
        sanctions and speak of success.
        And earlier, built factories, schools, hospitals spoke of success. Less than 18 years after the war, they flew into space.
        And now, pride in the money invested in the economy of the alleged enemy.
        1. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 26 February 2018 12: 35
          +7
          Quote: Gardamir
          sanctions and speak of success.
          And earlier, built factories, schools, hospitals spoke of success. Less than 18 years after the war, they flew into space. And now, pride in the money invested in the economy of the alleged enemy.
          I’ll leave a little here ...
          1. Gardamir
            Gardamir 26 February 2018 13: 55
            +9
            I'll leave it here







            1. businessv
              businessv 26 February 2018 18: 23
              +7
              Quote: Gardamir
              I'll leave it here

              Prior to this comment, there was a better opinion of your knowledge of the economy. Are you kidding me?! Whose plants are these? Who gave the green light to privatization? How were plant resources used? Or were you still small at the time, in the 90s, and did not understand what was going on? There was a total, systematic destruction of the country and its economic and human resources! For a better understanding of the ways of "distributing folk wealth", listen to the rantings of Chubais of the 90s! Or, at worst, put next to the name of the plant, the year of its privatization, for objectivity of perception. People who privatized the factories received a lot of money in American rubles in order to close them, these factories. I won’t explain a lot of things, but those who wanted to keep the enterprises saved. Belarus is an example of this.
              1. Gardamir
                Gardamir 26 February 2018 19: 37
                +7
                Who gave the green light to privatization?
                But really, who? Did Yeltsin open the AZLK in 2010? And ZIL, which after 2011, where several workshops operate. And the military Saratov Aviation? It's not about privatization; many factories have been quietly closed.
                1. Nyrobsky
                  Nyrobsky 26 February 2018 22: 13
                  +3
                  Quote: Gardamir
                  Who gave the green light to privatization?
                  But really, who? Did Yeltsin open the AZLK in 2010? And ZIL, which after 2011, where several workshops operate. And the military Saratov Aviation? It's not about privatization; many factories have been quietly closed.

                  Your impulse is understandable, but it is not clear what makes you lie? Yes, the AZLK (a car knowingly lacking in quality) of the type died and its trademark now belongs to Volkswagen. Yes, Luzhkov subsidized this plant from the city budget, but the automotive industry has never been Russia's strong point. It was we in space and in arms that were ahead of the whole planet, or at least almost on equal terms. But the remains of the plant were bought out and Renault Logan, Megan, Sandero, etc. are produced on their basis. to Duster on the Logan platform. There are no familiar AZLK type BUKs, but the owner has a desire to arrange the production of cheap cars under the Moskvich trademark.
                  1. Gardamir
                    Gardamir 26 February 2018 22: 45
                    +4
                    I see what makes you lie?
                    obviously the service of the masters. therefore lie. type in the search for Russian car factories. There and Toyota, and BMW and Renault with Hyundai and everything is not based on azlk. Only all this screwdrivers. want real sanctions and take the factories.
                    1. Nyrobsky
                      Nyrobsky 26 February 2018 23: 05
                      +1
                      Quote: Gardamir
                      I see what makes you lie?
                      obviously the service of the masters. therefore lie. type in the search for Russian car factories. There and Toyota, and BMW and Renault with Hyundai and everything is not based on azlk. Only all this screwdrivers. want real sanctions and take the factories.

                      If there are "real" sanctions, let V.I. Lenin remember - "The young Soviet republic refuses to recognize royal debts to foreign capital." What prevents us from seizing their property and stopping payments on external debts, in view of the force majeure event provoked by their side? I do not think that they are ready to aggravate the situation so much that they would lose their assets.
                      1. Gardamir
                        Gardamir 27 February 2018 08: 20
                        +2
                        it prevents us from seizing their property and stopping payments on external debts,
                        the love of the current rulers for the West, their money is there, their children are there.
                2. businessv
                  businessv April 20 2018 23: 27
                  0
                  Quote: Gardamir
                  But really, who? Did Yeltsin open the AZLK in 2010? And ZIL, which after 2011, where several workshops operate. And the military Saratov Aviation?

                  If all the subcontractors of a plant are sold out, achievements and projects are lost and they are very actively distributed to EBN, including strategic secrets, then is it worth keeping the plant itself if it CANNOT produce products?
          2. yehat
            yehat 26 February 2018 14: 50
            +9
            the volume of cut was at least 40% of the estimate. A lot of investigations in open sources and no one sat down, although the volumes, it seems to me, are equal to treason.

            Separately, I would like to mention that the costs of the east and the construction of the boykonur can be compared, objects can even be compared individually. Compare estimates for bridges of China similar to the Kerch and slightly go nuts. Informative. And at the same time mention the Zenit space center-arena, the most expensive stadium in the history of the planet.
        2. your1970
          your1970 26 February 2018 18: 09
          +2
          Quote: Gardamir
          sanctions and speak of success.
          And earlier, built factories, schools, hospitals spoke of success. Less than 18 years after the war, they flew into space.
          And now, pride in the money invested in the economy of the alleged enemy.
          -during these 18 years you would plow at the machine at this time, "Today, 09:17 ↑ "- they plowed, but would not have sharpened the hairs. And God forbid, they also expressed something dissatisfied ...
          1. Gardamir
            Gardamir 26 February 2018 18: 24
            +6
            you would plow at the machine at this time
            do you think it scares me?
            1. your1970
              your1970 26 February 2018 19: 21
              +1
              Quote: Gardamir
              you would plow at the machine at this time
              do you think it scares me?
              But then they didn’t scare it ... then it was a fact, a material embodiment of the desire for socialism ...
              "To sound (on the forum!) - don’t toss the bags!" - 9/10 of the local population did not see dugouts in principle ..
              send somebody right now on a Komsomol trip to taiga-voyu !!!
              1. Gardamir
                Gardamir 26 February 2018 19: 48
                +3
                send someone right now on a Komsomol trip to taiga-howl !!
                You are too strict, we have all been spoiled for modern life. What's in the taiga, leave someone for a week without a smartphone)
                1. your1970
                  your1970 26 February 2018 20: 36
                  +2
                  here the cellular phone chopped off for 2 days, I thought the people would go crazy
    2. You Vlad
      You Vlad 26 February 2018 08: 49
      +9
      Quote: Nix1986
      The author is well done, licks at 5+.

      And you, too, I look at the 5 column lick normally so well done! good Thirty Serebrennikov not yet issued?
      1. Loess
        Loess 26 February 2018 08: 57
        +11
        Quote: You Vlad
        And you, too, I look at the 5 column lick normally so well done!

        And after that you say that I'm strict with them?))) hi
      2. Nix1986
        Nix1986 26 February 2018 09: 14
        +8
        Are you completely mepo? Why did you get that I'm licking? or are you such a licking specialist that you already see your own kind through the monitor? not dude, 30 did not give, all with their hump, although who are you that I’m explaining something to you here.
        1. You Vlad
          You Vlad 26 February 2018 09: 38
          +7
          Quote: Nix1986
          Are you completely mepo? Why did you get that I'm licking?

          Yes, this is understood by psychology recourse
          Quote: Nix1986
          The author is well done, licks at 5+
          1. Nix1986
            Nix1986 26 February 2018 09: 45
            +8
            For your information, even nifig psychiatry does not understand how the brain works, until recently it was believed that everyone had equal opportunities, and only recently a team of neuroscientists determined that the number of patterns was different for everyone. And psychology is a divorce on babos. For example, you have a problem, your wife says I want another man to live with us, our psychologist will say this is the problem with your wife, the Swedish psychologist will say the problem is with you, you are behind in the development of a relationship model, and in Sudan where there is no psychologist there is also your wife will be stoned. Do not go into the analysis of the brain, it is difficult and therefore not yours.
      3. Galleon
        Galleon 26 February 2018 09: 45
        +4
        Oh my candy lover on all fours wassat actively working here. Hello my friend! hi
        Nothing new, look - the same training manual. Always stay in the same position as in the photo. Success in PP, BP, you never had and will not, you will not go through the medical board. wink
        1. You Vlad
          You Vlad 26 February 2018 09: 54
          +6
          Quote: Galleon
          Oh, my candy lover on all fours is actively working here. Hello my friend!

          You know, but you have not changed repeat Do you know a joke about the cycle in nature? Uncle, can I even talk dumb with you, so Adyu hi
  7. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 26 February 2018 07: 31
    +26
    Well, just a “hera” - “a knight without fear and reproach”, “horror flying on the wings of the night” and “the most, most honest pioneer” .... one and against the “universal lie” - “pat him”, ... and "friends" from the inner circle and "newly formed" during his reign, billionaires can .... shake bundles of money in approval .... winked
  8. Bongo
    Bongo 26 February 2018 07: 37
    +26
    It is completely unclear what the author wanted to achieve with this publication? request Does he think everyone around is blind and dumb? No. But this is clearly not the case with most readers of Military Review! No. Why only put this under the heading "Analytics"? After all, the "analysts" in this laudatory ode to the great and irreplaceable are not worth a penny.
    1. a.sirin
      a.sirin 26 February 2018 11: 16
      +10
      He does not think - he wants it to be so. He does not even imagine what kind of abyss is now opening between Russia and the West. Podolyka as a professional “fighter for the regime” does not imagine the consequences of this.
    2. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 26 February 2018 12: 39
      +5
      Quote: Bongo
      It is completely unclear what the author wanted to achieve with this publication? request Does he think everyone around is blind and dumb? No. But this is clearly not the case with most readers of Military Review! No. Why only put this under the heading "Analytics"? After all, the "analysts" in this laudatory ode to the great and irreplaceable are not worth a penny.
      Damn, how everything is started .... The author just wanted to say that - “It’s not good to lie” not only in everyday life, but also in politics, in the future it will end equally badly. What is not clear?
      1. Bongo
        Bongo 26 February 2018 12: 53
        +10
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        The author simply wanted to say that - “Lying is not good”, not only in everyday life, but also in politics, most of which will subsequently end up equally badly.

        Those. you argue that our current president never lied, and publicly?
        1. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 26 February 2018 13: 10
          +6
          Quote: Bongo
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          The author simply wanted to say that - “Lying is not good”, not only in everyday life, but also in politics, most of which will subsequently end up equally badly.

          Those. you argue that our current president never lied, and publicly?

          Dear, if you want to be deceived, then be it. As a consolation, I can say that any election program, of any presidential candidate, or of deputies of different stripes and political preferences, is 99% a slogan or a terry lie. This is not the point. Now we are talking about foreign policy and the perception of the country's leader by the international community. If Putin promised something, then he is fulfilling his obligations, which not many can boast of in today's political elite. This quality of GDP was especially appreciated in the countries of the East, because now it is there that they want to see Russia as an assistant (intermediary) and turn to it for help avoiding the “services” of the USA.
          1. Bongo
            Bongo 26 February 2018 13: 15
            +8
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            Dear, if you want to be deceived, then be it. As a consolation, I can say that any election program, of any presidential candidate, or of deputies of various stripes and political preferences, on 99% is a slogan or a terry lie.

            You please do not breed demagoguery, answer directly to the asked question.
        2. zyablik.olga
          zyablik.olga 26 February 2018 14: 57
          +10
          Quote: Bongo
          Those. you argue that our current president never lied, and publicly?

  9. aybolyt678
    aybolyt678 26 February 2018 08: 00
    +1
    The problem of Truth is its dual nature. Everyone has her own.
  10. cedar
    cedar 26 February 2018 08: 08
    +15
    Question to all the local anti-Putiners. If Putin destroys the people and everything that he did is anti-people, then for what reason is a sanctioned, or rather, a hybrid war to destroy the Russian people being waged against Russia, the whole trap under the leadership of the United States?
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. groks
          groks 26 February 2018 09: 06
          +3
          Most precious, we did not have presidents in the USSR. So do not whistle.
          1. You Vlad
            You Vlad 26 February 2018 09: 10
            +7
            Quote: groks
            Most precious, we did not have presidents in the USSR. So do not whistle.

            Love you turn everything upside down!
            Quote: You Vlad
            this is your president

            Okay, let it be your Secretary General yes
          2. vovanpain
            vovanpain 26 February 2018 09: 16
            +9
            Quote: groks
            Most precious, we did not have presidents in the USSR. So do not whistle.

            O diamond, who was Gorbachev from March 15, 1990 to December 25, 1991, huh? Or in the USSR, the most precious whistler did not live. laughing
            1. groks
              groks 26 February 2018 09: 26
              +2
              And why did he become mine? Come on - your Benny then. Good? Do not refuse? Why - yes, I want it so. Why not blurt out.
              1. You Vlad
                You Vlad 26 February 2018 09: 41
                +3
                Quote: groks
                And why did he become mine?

                Quote: groks
                Those. as a result of Putin’s activities, a war was declared against the people, and Putin remained somehow on the side. So can he just be a provocateur?

                Quote: groks
                Come on - your Benny then.

                Good, but I hope Beni’s last name is Putin? lol
                1. groks
                  groks 26 February 2018 09: 49
                  +6
                  The surname of that drunk is known.
                  Gentlemen, liberal democrats and oligarchic patriots - maybe it’s enough to flood already from scratch?
          3. businessv
            businessv 26 February 2018 18: 28
            +1
            Quote: groks
            Most precious, we did not have presidents in the USSR. So do not whistle.

            And who was Gorbachev after his general secretary ?!
        2. yehat
          yehat 26 February 2018 14: 53
          +2
          So Gorbachev is still alive, this is your president, you deserve him all and now love

          as early as 96 saw with his own eyes how a student at KSU smashed his face.
      2. dSK
        dSK 26 February 2018 09: 03
        +8
        Quote: groks
        against Russia

        Monster_Fat

        Nix1986

        zyablik.olga

        Santa Fe

        Sobchak earned over six years 403 million 855 thousand rubles. Such data are published on the CEC website. Among the sources of these assets are the presenter’s salary on Silver Rain radio station and Dozhd channel, as well as in the Global Media Group publishing house.
        1. Monster_Fat
          Monster_Fat 26 February 2018 09: 18
          +16
          Yeah, but Putin is "dysfunctional", living on one "Russian" salary, ..... an example shows, "pat him" ...
          1. vovanpain
            vovanpain 26 February 2018 09: 44
            +10
            Quote: Monster_Fat
            Yeah, but Putin is "dysfunctional", living on one "Russian" salary, ..... an example shows, "pat him" ...

            The miracle is striped, your "billions" of Putin were looking for in offshore zones and they found "billions ..... Poroshenko. laughing Well, from America you can see everything. laughing
            1. Monster_Fat
              Monster_Fat 26 February 2018 10: 08
              +14
              No, I’m saying, he lives on one “Russian” salary, walks in one suit for 18 years, saves, takes care of the country, of the people ... “pat him”. laughing
              1. businessv
                businessv 26 February 2018 18: 34
                +1
                Quote: Monster_Fat
                No, I’m saying, he lives on one “Russian” salary, walks in one suit for 18 years, saves, takes care of the country, of the people ... “pat him”.

                Friends, what happens to you after you emigrate to the States? smile GDP for your salary will be able to buy costumes for your entire family, if you have one. If you don’t understand what exactly is happening, then better not to write anything! If you understand, then write correctly, without trolling and disrespect for the people present on the VO resource. Or are you trying to match your nickname?
        2. Santa Fe
          Santa Fe 26 February 2018 10: 31
          +9
          Quote: dsk
          Sobchak earned for six years 403 million 855 thousand rubles.

          I appeal to everyone who still considers Sobchak to be a “liberal freak” with some kind of presidential ambitions.
          ____________________________________
          Look at those who are now directors of large corporations — these are all members of the CPSU. 30 years have passed, and the people are the same. How it happened: they were in chocolate in the USSR, after the reform of Chubais and Gaidar they were in chocolate, and under Putin they were in chocolate. Maybe the power has not changed? And she does everything to keep the current order. Power and money - from father to son.

          How can Sobchak be against this power, if she owes everything to her?. Anatoly Sobchak, the first mayor of St. Petersburg and Putin’s employer

          And suddenly, from the year 2011, Ksyusha is speaking on behalf of the opposition
          Do not believe and do not get fooled by these tricks. Ksyusha is a common spoiler, provocateur, traitor. Specially plays the role of a liberal freak, so that the government can show - see, the opposition is all composed of such "eccentrics". And the future president seemed to be really a pillar of wisdom against the background of these caricature candidates (in life, smart people who play their role in public; because their current well-being is due to this government)
    2. rocket757
      rocket757 26 February 2018 08: 59
      +2
      If the ruler is only a plus ... at probably fantasy, it does not happen.
      In the negative, you can believe it.
      Rather, it will be so, and so, the question that outweighs .... you can drip a little deeper, but why is this happening? You can go further, and who else will be better? Who for example?
      A lot of questions, what will be the answers?
    3. Alex66
      Alex66 26 February 2018 09: 09
      +9
      And all just the old bourgeoisie of the West do not want to recognize the new bourgeoisie of the former USSR, they won the Cold War and we rightfully belong to them. Our people have to rely on patriotism, because there is no other support for China on its mind, and Brix. As soon as everything settles down the people will not be needed, it will be possible to leave 15 million as M. Thatcher said.
    4. Gardamir
      Gardamir 26 February 2018 09: 12
      +17
      against Russia, the whole trap led by the United States, a hybrid war to destroy the Russian people?
      And this is a question for the president, why he allowed the West to power, all these Grefs, Nabiullins, Shuvalovs, Ulyukaevs ...
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2018 09: 26
        +8
        So, a lot of questions. While acceptable, convincing answers will not be given, our authorities will accumulate cons in the asset!
        Although, real things are better than any answers, convincingly, outweighing everything and everyone!
      2. businessv
        businessv 26 February 2018 20: 33
        +1
        Quote: Gardamir
        And this is a question for the president, why he allowed the West to power, all these Grefs, Nabiullins, Shuvalovs, Ulyukaevs ...

        Are you sure that he allowed it? It can be assumed that they inherited from his predecessor, from EBN, as the only condition for the transfer of power to him ?!
    5. aybolyt678
      aybolyt678 26 February 2018 09: 59
      +14
      Quote: cedar
      hybrid war to destroy the Russian people?

      the war to destroy the people is being waged by all. And the West too. It’s just that the power at the helm in Russia uses Russia to protect the interests of not the whole “people” but its “best” part.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2018 10: 19
        +3
        But this is a minus, real such things!
    6. Antivirus2k
      Antivirus2k 26 February 2018 17: 26
      +7
      Well, for example, because under Putin Russia can be destroyed and therefore the West is doing this. How do you like this option? Under Stalin, for example, it was scary, so they yelled a little (Hitler doesn’t count, this is a separate issue), and in general they only growled at the USSR, because it’s scary, and Putin’s Russia is bitten, and it’s painful. In your understanding, when they want to destroy the people, will they praise it? Yeltsin and Gorbachev were praised, yes, but this is only the first stage, the goal then was not "the destruction of the people", but "the destruction of the USSR." Now the second goal is no longer relevant, moving on to the main goal. You understand, the destruction of the people is a multi-stage process. And the master of "multi-paths" is not Putin's nifig, he is generally mediocre in this regard, the master of "multi-paths" is just the same West.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2018 22: 56
        +2
        Well, yes, in our country, the line from the grandmasters is rightly lined up, is each other better ???
        If we have, then there is.
    7. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 26 February 2018 23: 11
      +2
      Quote: cedar
      Question to all the local anti-Putiners. If Putin destroys the people and everything that he did is anti-people, then for what reason is a sanctioned, or rather, a hybrid war to destroy the Russian people being waged against Russia, the whole trap under the leadership of the United States?

      It is unnecessary to ask questions today ... Here today is the Sabbath of Liberoty. They have such a day in half, two times 26))) A rod like cockroaches, nor any slippers would be enough to fight back. Probably, the mattresses of non-profit organizations were extended with “greenery” - there they’re trying)))
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2018 23: 28
        +3
        Their censer, right along the cumpole ... oh, shot I didn’t say that, with a kind word, of course, exhortations and persuasions. Spit, scrub. They’ll beat it on the cheek, turn the other one over.
        Oh, shot, I’m not carrying it again .... to soak them, we can also use holy water, who is quite violent, into the font, let the bubbles go !!!!
        1. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 26 February 2018 23: 35
          +1
          Quote: rocket757
          Their censer, right along the cumpole ... oh, shot I didn’t say that, with a kind word, of course, exhortations and persuasions. Spit, scrub. They’ll beat it on the cheek, turn the other one over.

          You interpret the commandments incorrectly)))
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 27 February 2018 08: 33
            +1
            Improvisation, I am not a connoisseur of holy scripture and the commandments of identity.
  11. ML-334
    ML-334 26 February 2018 08: 10
    +11
    The author was not lucky today on the day of the liberal. Do not be stupid, you understand why. Your 90s are standing in front of your eyes — how you cared for the people.
    1. Yurasumy
      26 February 2018 08: 17
      +10
      No, it’s just that elections in Russia, and like any political resource, are the most active liberals. It will pass after March 18.
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 26 February 2018 08: 50
        +8
        Quote: yurasumy
        No, it’s just that elections in Russia, and like any political resource, are the most active liberals. It will pass after March 18.

        You correctly noticed it. And the more we object to them, the more they fly to the site! Enough to mind them? Let their pride amuse among such as themselves? Let them revel in their “victory” here - on the site! And we will say our word in the elections! And then we laugh at them. Only, I feel, they will either disappear from the site after the election, or switch to another topic.
        And in your article you have set everything right! And the fact that the truth you wrote is visible in a cloud of crows flown by the smell. Good luck to you!
        1. groks
          groks 26 February 2018 09: 04
          +16
          Guys - you do not understand. Liberals call you. For supporting the liberal government and the liberal president.
          1. You Vlad
            You Vlad 26 February 2018 09: 14
            +6
            Quote: groks
            Guys - you do not understand. Liberals call you.

            Liberal liberal discord yes There are for example five-column .. They just spoiled the very concept of liberal among the masses.
            1. Nyrobsky
              Nyrobsky 26 February 2018 12: 45
              +8
              Quote: you Vlad
              Quote: groks
              Guys - you do not understand. Liberals call you.

              Liberal liberal discord yes There are for example five-column .. They just spoiled the very concept of liberal among the masses.
              The liberal is generally an abusive word and it is quite possible that they will be beaten soon ....
          2. yehat
            yehat 26 February 2018 14: 59
            0
            I think Putin’s calling liberal is stupid,
            firstly, our "liberals" and liberalism have very little in common.
            closer name is anarchists.
            secondly, Putin is rather a centrist.
            1. groks
              groks 26 February 2018 16: 35
              +7
              Nothing that he calls himself that?
        2. vovanpain
          vovanpain 26 February 2018 09: 20
          +10
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          then we laugh at them. Only, I feel, they will either disappear from the site after the election, or switch to another topic.

          Alexander drinks hi mind you, this main crow has flown to the site since the end of 2017, with rare exceptions, after the election, they will also come to naught, with rare exceptions, this is not the first time by the way in VO. hi
          1. SRC P-15
            SRC P-15 26 February 2018 11: 46
            +6
            Quote: vovanpain
            Alexander, notice that this crow has flown to the site since the end of 2017, with rare exceptions, after the election, they will also come to naught, with rare exceptions, this is not the first time by the way to VO.

            Vladimir drinks hi I noticed this a long time ago and wrote about it more than once. What to do: the State Department is working properly and the bucks allocated to this crow are worked out by them in a sweat. Let your purchased vanity amuse. "Then there will be a surprise!"
            1. groks
              groks 26 February 2018 14: 51
              +1
              It will be very funny when all this propaganda subsides after the election.
              However, in LJ, this author did not notice an extreme fixation on Putin's licking. Why then drop such frenzied articles here?
      2. You Vlad
        You Vlad 26 February 2018 08: 58
        +5
        Quote: yurasumy
        No, it’s just that elections in Russia, and like any political resource, are the most active liberals. It will pass after March 18.

        Thank you for the article! hi The GDP photo made me think, his look was like that of a man walking on a scaffold!
      3. Gardamir
        Gardamir 26 February 2018 09: 09
        +16
        liberals are the most active.
        Only the liberal defends the president’s liberal. Yes, and you defend it liberally without burdening yourself with evidence. Failure is considered success, then success. The lie is now true, And immediately sniff.
      4. Captain45
        Captain45 26 February 2018 11: 40
        +7
        Quote: ML-334
        The author was not lucky today on the day of the liberal. Do not be stupid, you understand why. Your 90s are standing in front of your eyes — how you cared for the people.

        Quote: yurasumy
        No, it’s just that elections in Russia, and like any political resource, are the most active liberals. It will pass after March 18

        Colleagues, do not worry so much about the statements here. Yesterday I said in the "Results of the week" this is the Internet, here everyone strives to show himself in a trend. That’s what kind of creative, advanced liberal-rear-wheel drive I’m trying to spoil, as he thinks of the country, but really in his bosom. About athletes and the Olympics that they just did not write and how they (athletes) were not called. But in the end it turned out that everyone was watching the Olympic Games, worried about our athletes, and after the victory of the hockey players, everyone simply burst into enthusiastic cries. In general, as in the joke "but how I breathed, how I breathed" 18.03 will come. and all the screamers will come to the polls and vote as it should and for the one for whom it is necessary. But to yell, to be indignant. Well, how can one do without this, it is necessary to express a protest. And then after the election another month 2-3 will shout about illegitimate elections, they say neither I nor relatives, nor friends voted like that and stole their voices. Well, they will, they will and they will stop. There will be spring, barbecue holidays in nature, cottages, gardens. Not until the protests. Well, maybe in May some piled on, he rips them riot police and they calm down.
        1. Z_G_R
          Z_G_R 26 February 2018 15: 41
          +11
          I did not watch the Olympics in principle. And he would not extol the victory of hockey players, they showed their level in Sochi. Therefore, knowing that the strongest wouldn’t come to Korea, they were so eager to go there) Well done, of course, they won, but really if you think about who they won? =)

          The 18th day will come and I will vote for Grudinin, and not for the oligarchs in power) Putin will surely win, and then spring, summer, autumn will come, and our liberal government will tighten the nuts more and more tightly. And over time, the Uraputins will decrease here. Life will show everything over time)
          1. Captain45
            Captain45 26 February 2018 16: 32
            +6
            Quote: Z_G_R
            18 number will come and I will vote for Grudinin, and not for the oligarchs in power) Putin will win, of course, and then spring, summer, autumn will come and our liberal government will tighten the screws even tighter.

            Yes, your life is hard crying It's time to throw repeat
    2. zyablik.olga
      zyablik.olga 26 February 2018 08: 45
      +24
      Quote: ML-334
      The author was not lucky today on the day of the liberal.

      That is, all who do not support the policies of the current Russian government are "liberals." Are you sure?
      I categorically disagree with the investments of billions collected in taxes in Russia in the American economy, with the collapse of healthcare and education.
      1. ML-334
        ML-334 26 February 2018 09: 27
        +5
        Everyone knows, with 90 in the government, we have liberals under the patronage of the Democrats because of the "puddle", that is, yours are all complaints against them and not to Putin.
        1. zyablik.olga
          zyablik.olga 26 February 2018 09: 39
          +15
          Quote: ML-334
          Everyone knows, with 90 in the government, we have liberals under the patronage of the Democrats because of the "puddle", that is, yours are all complaints against them and not to Putin.

          Yes, what are you saying? wassat But Putin did not even know that there were enemies in the government whose activities he was pleased with. What has been stated repeatedly. For all 18 years of his reign, what has he been doing? Only sterkhov taught to fly and dive for amphora? If he is not in the know, then why is he needed at all?
          1. B.T.V.
            B.T.V. 26 February 2018 09: 44
            +6
            Quote: zyablik.olga
            All 18 years of his reign, what did he excuse me? Only sterkhov taught to fly and dive for amphora?


            No, the defense industry was still recovering.
            1. zyablik.olga
              zyablik.olga 26 February 2018 10: 14
              +18
              Quote: B.T.W.
              No, the defense industry was still recovering.

              And let's see when he began to pour money into the defense industry and why? Maybe just scared of what happened to Gaddafi and Hussein?
              In general, reading the comments on VO, I see three main categories of website visitors that protect the current government:

              1. Poorly educated suggestible citizens with a narrow horizons and brainwashed by zombies. This also includes all sorts of "patriotic" inadequacies and religious fanatics.
              This category, when there are no arguments, very quickly switches to labeling and direct insults.

              2. People with a good education and admitted to the "feeding trough".
              These are all kinds of heads of state structures, or businessmen affiliated with them who have the opportunity to "drank," as well as high-ranking security officials - that is, those who have something to lose if honest people come to power.

              3. Those who defend power on the Internet owe a duty. And there are quite a few of them on Military Review.
              1. B.T.V.
                B.T.V. 26 February 2018 10: 50
                +7
                Quote: zyablik.olga
                1. Poorly educated suggestible citizens with a narrow horizons and brainwashed by zombies. This also includes all sorts of "patriotic" inadequacies and religious fanatics.
                This category, when there are no arguments, very quickly switches to labeling and direct insults.


                You know, this category can be successfully attributed to all those who are against the "current government", because everyone’s arguments, like a carbon copy, hang up labels no worse than opponents.

                Quote: zyablik.olga
                2. People with a good education and admitted to the "feeding trough".

                As a rule, opponents are the same, just not getting to the "feeding trough" or at one time "excommunicated".

                Quote: zyablik.olga
                3. Those who defend power on the Internet owe a duty. And there are quite a few of them on Military Review.


                And there are a lot of those who are agitating against the current government “on duty” (to whom ?!) in VO (especially since the end of 2017), and they are “multiplying” like the simplest (sexless).
                1. groks
                  groks 26 February 2018 11: 53
                  +5
                  And those who are campaigning against the current government
                  Is anyone agitating against her? This makes no sense, since there is no alternative. They simply swear at the authorities, because they already got it.
              2. yehat
                yehat 26 February 2018 15: 03
                +1
                Poorly educated suggestible citizens with narrow horizons and brainwashed

                it is in every society. the duty of those who consider themselves patriots and owners of the brain to direct this mass in a direction useful to the country. Alas, this does not work out and a blind herd of sheep regularly trample good undertakings.
          2. Santa Fe
            Santa Fe 26 February 2018 10: 47
            +12
            Quote: zyablik.olga
            He is all 18 years of his rule than you did? Only Sterkhov taught to fly and dive for amphoras? If he does not know, then why do he even need it?

            ALL JUST

            Plant manager - good
            Shop managers cheat the director and secretly work for another plant
            The director of 18 has years of factory management experience. If not him, then who?
            It is necessary to tell the director about all the problems and the total betrayal of other superiors, because he does not know anything about the situation at the plant.
            1. yehat
              yehat 26 February 2018 15: 04
              +3
              no, the picture is different)))
              not the director of the plant, but the AI ​​selected by the committee of shop managers.
              then the picture falls into place)))
          3. ML-334
            ML-334 26 February 2018 12: 57
            +4
            If Putin had power like Stalin, there would be a different demand, but for now, he is slowly crushing like nits. And even at the moment, our cause is right and we will win!
            1. Z_G_R
              Z_G_R 26 February 2018 15: 44
              +5
              You will be surprised, but Stalin gained real fullness of power only during the war only. And so there was a tough confrontation with the Trotskyists. So that Putin has everything, only he doesn’t need it, he is with “his own people”. He is happy with everything, which he officially talks about)
              1. ML-334
                ML-334 26 February 2018 16: 52
                +3
                From the 10th year he is obliged to raise Russia, which he does is a program, I did not vote for him, but this time I will vote. I somehow trust my intuition and calmly.
      2. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2018 09: 34
        +6
        Nobody called the liberal, on the contrary. Only the current power can not stand by definition, it is not popular.
        Those. there is probably a third party and .... how many did not count them.
        1. rice
          rice 26 February 2018 14: 07
          +2
          Quote: rocket757
          Only the current power can not stand by definition, it is not popular.

          what And where and when was the people's power? It could be called in different ways, but in fact it is ALWAYS the power of a group of people.
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 26 February 2018 14: 40
            +2
            No no. At the initial stage, the power of the Soviets was controlled by the masses. Then the party elite / bureaucracy tried to secure itself and out of the control of labor collectives. We assume that she succeeded to a greater extent. In the last period of its existence, the people were removed from power as elsewhere. Further known. The people voted in favor of preserving the USSR, the party elite frankly scored everything.
            History must be known so as not to step on the same rake.
            1. rice
              rice 26 February 2018 21: 55
              +1
              Quote: rocket757
              At the initial stage, the power of the Soviets was controlled by the masses

              Well, you’re being cunning. At the initial stage, power was brought on bayonets, or on the threat of their use. And then the appearance of popular power was created: the collective farm was voluntary — if you want to come in, and if you don’t want, we will take away the cow.
              In my opinion (maybe erroneous) ANY power is an institution of coercion of the ruling ideology.
              Quote: rocket757
              History must be known so as not to step on the same rake.

              I completely agree. But in addition to the "rake" do not forget about the price of our achievements.
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 26 February 2018 23: 16
                +1
                Any power is a story of violence - that's for sure.
                I do not dissemble, I affirm for sure, you are simply not familiar with the consistency and facts from the history of the formation of the Soviet State. If interested, read \ listen to Popov and other academic historians / scientists. I can’t explain this for a long time, and the primary sources are always more reliable.
                A simple fact is that at the first stage, power was chosen / formed from working collectives and a conscious peasantry.
                Elected, controlled and responded to by selected comrades by universal suffrage! The peasants began to participate in this process a little later.
                Workers and peasant collectives lost control of the party elite much later ... in short, you need to read the sources .... by the way, Comrade Stalin was advanced somewhere on the periphery. The entire composition of senior employees passed through a real screening in labor collectives and was nominated only through them.
                But, the bureaucracy and officials turned it all around, changed the constitution, and then the furry northern animal came. There you go.
                Read, not read, your choice.
                1. rice
                  rice 27 February 2018 12: 40
                  +1
                  Quote: rocket757
                  you are simply not familiar with the consistency and facts from the history of the formation of the Soviet State.

                  pleased with the bold statement.
                  Quote: rocket757
                  read \ listen to Popov and other academic historians / scientists

                  As far as I know, the story is written by the winners.
                  What you say may have taken place in central Russia, but in Siberia, much was completely different. I will give a couple of examples from personal experience, and not from books. At the end of the 70s, in the 80s, I was fishing a lot in Khakassia. So there they remembered very well about the affairs of Gaidar. According to the old people, not all fascists had as much blood on their hands as he did when he instilled Soviet power.

                  Quote: rocket757
                  in short, you need to read the source.

                  Read, outlined, but ....
                  My own grandmother was born in 1905. In the 80s, I tried to prove to her about the same thing as you do now. So she told me something like this: "In our village there was only one poor family. This is Yashka-drunk. But at the meeting, he yelled loudest than everyone else. And government officials from the city approved him chairman of the collective farm. "
                  I did not write this in order to prove your wrong. In a very large number of cases, you are right. But there are a lot of cases of the development of situations according to my version. And if you take the conditions for the formation of Soviet power in Central Asia, or in the far north. laughing
                  1. rocket757
                    rocket757 27 February 2018 13: 03
                    +2
                    An ardent one from the Country of Soviets is working at my side, I am a liberal in comparison with him, etc.
                    Therefore, I have to argue based only on facts ... by the way about the story and the winners, my constant argument, though he still does not believe in it.
                    So, as a rule, I have to fight on two fronts - against those who brand unproven Soviet power and those who paint it completely white.
                    I do not need to prove that the change of one order to another was very bloody, I just know.
                    About the workaholic of peasants, individual peasants and kulaks ... and of course about the gorlopan activists, loafers or losers. from which later functionaries grew up ... I know everything.
                    About repression - the class struggle, the nonsense that developed around these.

                    Everything is understandable, we smoothly left the primary question - Was there a people's power? “I'm just saying.” what a period in Soviet history was! -
                    I didn’t want to expand the scope of the dispute, the topic is painfully vast, complicated and takes a lot of time!
                    Et as a question - Is there life on Mars -. in fact, all genuine information for that period is not available to us. So it is better to focus on personal perception, opinion - I just think that scrapping the Soviet system, without a real attempt to modernize it, was a mistake / crime against our people.
                    1. rice
                      rice 27 February 2018 14: 58
                      +1
                      Quote: rocket757
                      I didn’t want to expand the scope of the dispute, the topic is painfully vast, complicated and takes a lot of time!

                      yes
                      Quote: rocket757
                      the demolition of the Soviet system, without a real attempt to modernize it, was a mistake / crime against our people.

                      And with this I agree to all 100.
                      Quote: rocket757
                      we smoothly left the primary question

                      repeat something skidded me.
                      1. rocket757
                        rocket757 28 February 2018 09: 07
                        +1
                        Fine. He brings himself not infrequently, and if you figure it out, consider it all happening to everyone! soldier
      3. B.T.V.
        B.T.V. 26 February 2018 09: 38
        +5
        Quote: zyablik.olga
        I categorically disagree with the investments of billions collected in taxes in Russia in the American economy, with the collapse of healthcare and education.


        So many times, and at VO too, it was explained about the "billion invested in the American economy." Why is China "investing in the American economy" ?!
        1. Gardamir
          Gardamir 26 February 2018 09: 45
          +14
          So many times, and at VO too, it was explained about the "billion invested in the American economy." Why is China "investing in the American economy" ?!
          China is not shy about developing its economy. We have no money, but you hold on. There is money to support banks, but for the people there isn’t everything exported to Omerigu. How many factories, hospital schools built, How are money invested in science.?.
          1. ML-334
            ML-334 26 February 2018 13: 03
            +6
            In China, the death penalty has not been abolished, unlike us. All the laws of the thieves made for themselves - the more he stole, the less punishment. Where do we go to China.
        2. 406ppm2gv
          406ppm2gv 26 February 2018 21: 49
          +2
          Well, how many times, and in VO too, it was explained about the "billion invested in the American economy." And why is China "investing in the American economy"?! [I] [/ i] Well, China can invest in the high-speed piece of iron Moscow-Kazan, just what will we give?
  12. Altona
    Altona 26 February 2018 08: 28
    +19
    Not being a supporter of Putin, I will nevertheless say a few words after reading some of the comments here. Russia does not have the resources to buy someone's favor, and if there is, it spends them without political pressure like the United States and the EU. The US and the EU for every dollar, not even aid, but loans, require changes in foreign and domestic policy. Neither in relation to Belarus nor to Ukraine (8 billion goods turnover in 2017, here we have such a war) we do not do this to anyone. And our "allies" in the person of Kazakhstan and Belarus are wiping their feet about us, although in many respects they depend on us. The United States is quickly putting Kazakhstan in its place, while the EU is rolling out Father Butt. GDP itself easily changes its popular support for kisses with Sechin, Rotenberg, Vekselberg and Miller, truly Gus people. He is friends with the "cannibals" Kudrin and Chubais.
    PS And by the way, there are a number of such questions for GDP that are very painful from Stepan Sulakshin:
    Questions to the candidate.
    1. What will he do when the country's budget, brought by Putinism to sovereignty, the owners of the situation will bring down 30 percent? What?
    2. When will the APU launch a large-scale offensive? What?
    3.When will the coalition start a direct war with Assad?
    4. Are they arresting money, including him?
    PPS About the "victories." Yes, there were “victories”, Sochi, Crimea, Donbass could be a victory, Syria. But without information support for their victories, the enemy quickly levels them. After Crimea, Putin had 2-3 months while the West was groping for a counter-game, he could reach Italy roughly, but he did nothing and withdrew his right to control the army directly. And he could restore half of the USSR in 2014. But apparently friends of the oligarchs dissuaded. War with NATO, sanctions and all that. And sanctions and hybrid war have come anyway.
    1. yousha1980
      yousha1980 26 February 2018 08: 44
      +7
      This is so obvious:
      1. Will make the budget even more sovereign than it is now. And 30% of our fall will be ridiculous compared to the global fall.
      2. Will introduce peacekeeping troops. For real.
      3. The supply of weapons to Assad and other opponents of the "coalition" will be quadrupled.
      4. Let them find first.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2018 09: 50
        +1
        Power is not "mine," in fact and by definition.
        It does not seem to matter that they play long and everything is not as primitive as it might seem. Yes, they are capitalists, the same as behind the Boer, there is still a focus on national interests, it is tied to personal interests, it is unequivocal.
        It is not clear what will happen in the future. Because they don’t seem to hand over everything, they will not want to hand over their own for any! It will be better / worse for us, there are doubts and not for the better.
        At the moment, we can’t influence events, our choice is very limited, consider not at all!
      2. Z_G_R
        Z_G_R 26 February 2018 15: 51
        +6
        your answers would go in kindergarten, but not in world politics. Putin will not fight the west. We have a pro-Western government, what kind of war can it be? Only the maximum concern) Our people as soon as they don’t wag trying to beg forgiveness from the West, and you say such words)) sovereign budget! peacekeeping troops! even funny.
      3. 406ppm2gv
        406ppm2gv 26 February 2018 21: 53
        +1
        Will make the budget even more sovereign than it is now. And 30% of our fall will be ridiculous compared to the global fall. [I] [/ i] the barrel will drop to $ 40, then we'll see.
    2. B.T.V.
      B.T.V. 26 February 2018 09: 34
      +3
      Quote: Altona
      . And by the way, there are a number of such questions for GDP that are very painful from Stepan Sulakshin:


      A.S. Sulakshin was a member of the EBN administration, was his adviser, then he had no questions for the current president at that time ?!
    3. Persian
      Persian 26 February 2018 10: 03
      +4
      And we need these former USSR countries, now we are collecting 50 kopecks per liter of gasoline on roads in the Crimea.
  13. yousha1980
    yousha1980 26 February 2018 08: 35
    +3
    I fully agree.
  14. cedar
    cedar 26 February 2018 08: 43
    +4
    Quote: groks
    against Russia

    Russian people

    Those. as a result of activities Fishing season, a war was declared against the people, and Putin remained somehow on the side. So he can just provocateur?


    Or maybe he is Colonel Maxim Maximovich Isaev in the den of the enemy ... under the nickname of Max Otto von Stirlitz?

    See the root, dear ... Simple only cats will be born.
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 26 February 2018 09: 05
      +11
      in the den of the enemy
      that is, Russia for him is the den of the enemy? Then he is Max Otto under the name Vladimir Vladimirovich.
  15. Gardamir
    Gardamir 26 February 2018 09: 04
    +18
    Here are the "merits" of the current government.
    Olympics, the country is prohibited from performing under its own symbols. Isn't that humiliation?
    The killing of Russians in Syria. Due to the fact that the government continues to cast the ichthamnet spell, it will not become easier. It can lie to us. But the enemy knows that the authorities for the sake of their children abroad will not even jerk to protect the Russian people.
    And by the way, we are on a military site. I hope it’s no secret to anyone that all aviation for our air defense is in full view.
    There are many examples of failures in foreign policy. Well, apart from the success of the established drug trafficking between Argentina and Moscow ...
    1. Loess
      Loess 26 February 2018 09: 19
      +3
      Quote: Gardamir
      Olympics, the country is prohibited from performing under its own symbols. Isn't that humiliation?

      Ours took Olympic gold in hockey, isn't this a victory?
      Quote: Gardamir
      The killing of Russians in Syria.

      There is a war going on if you are not in the know.
      Quote: Gardamir
      Well, apart from the success of the established drug trafficking between Argentina and Moscow ...

      Moscow, February 23. As a result of a joint special operation between Russia and Argentina, it was possible to block a large drug delivery channel. This was reported by a source in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia.
      It is known that intelligence agencies kept the operation secret until the last moment in order to avoid information leaks.
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 26 February 2018 09: 28
        +14
        Our
        How do you know? some kind of OAR, without a flag, without an anthem. And before that, yours paid IOC $ 15 million, there is no money for it, but we will give it to IOC. Is that success in foreign policy? A country without a flag, without a hymn?
        There is a war going on if you are not in the know.
        Why write if you don’t want to discuss the death of their banners? And not 5 died there, as Masha voiced in the Louboutins.
        And the reference to eternally lying departments is at least ridiculous.
        1. Loess
          Loess 26 February 2018 09: 37
          +4
          Quote: Gardamir
          how do you know? some kind of OAR, without a flag, without an anthem

          And I, unlike you, do not separate myself from Russia. Therefore - yes, ours paid 15mln and OURS took gold on hockey.
          Quote: Gardamir
          Why write if you don’t want to discuss the death of their banners? And not 5 died there, as Masha voiced in the Louboutins.
          And the reference to eternally lying departments is at least ridiculous.

          And you mean they didn’t learn from the media, but from social networks that always speak the truth?
          1. Gardamir
            Gardamir 26 February 2018 09: 52
            +10
            And I, unlike you
            I separate myself from the oligarchs and corrupt power. The good of financiers is not the good of the country. Yours paid to earn money at further olympiads, what does all this have to do with the development of sports in the country?
            What isn't the internet media? And what about your social network? In classmates, contact, facebook and others not seen. And is this a social network?
            1. Loess
              Loess 26 February 2018 10: 13
              +4
              Quote: Gardamir
              What isn't the internet media? And what about your social network? In classmates, contact, facebook and others not seen. And is this a social network?

              I did not see the arguments in favor of the fact that the resources you listed are more truthful than
              Quote: Gardamir
              eternally lying departments
              1. Gardamir
                Gardamir 26 February 2018 10: 17
                +5
                resources you listed
                In principle, I called only VO. I don’t attend the rest.
                1. Loess
                  Loess 26 February 2018 10: 40
                  +5
                  Quote: Gardamir
                  In principle, I called only VO. I don’t attend the rest.

                  Similarly (except that I look in the VK, but not for the news), but even the VO gives directly opposite data in various articles, how do you determine for yourself which article is submitted ... no, it’s not even true, but the most reliable information ? Indeed, you are probably conducting a subjective assessment of information ...
                  1. Gardamir
                    Gardamir 26 February 2018 15: 55
                    +6
                    After all, for sure you conduct a subjective assessment of information
                    Trying, of course I could be wrong. But two things help here. Firstly, it is necessary to judge by deeds, and not by some mythical successes, for example, in Moscow they don’t clear the snow, probably there is no money, but soon you won’t go outside without knowing the southern languages.
                    Secondly, the government is so carried away by a lie that it does not notice how it exposes itself at times.
                    And then in the time of Yeltsin, many also said glory to Yeltsin ...
                    1. Loess
                      Loess 26 February 2018 16: 10
                      +3
                      Quote: Gardamir
                      And then in the time of Yeltsin, many also said glory to Yeltsin ...

                      I didn’t say ... Just as I don’t say: glory to Putin ... That's just the antipathy to a particular politician I have never borne to my country, which is probably why I can not rejoice at the problems facing my country, regardless of who is in power ... And now I see the positive, I do not deny the existence of problems, but I do not see the gloomy picture that you constantly write about ... And at the time you mentioned Yeltsin, I could only joke bitterly and to hope for the best...
                      1. Gardamir
                        Gardamir 26 February 2018 16: 18
                        +4
                        I did not say.
                        Well, I'm not talking about you. And there is always positive. I am certainly not a supporter of the president, but sometimes when you read laudatory articles, you begin to feel sorry for him, because you were not lucky with the supporters. After reading these articles, you begin to truly hate.
                        We just live at this time and in this place, regardless of who is in power.
          2. AUL
            AUL 26 February 2018 12: 43
            +13
            Quote: Less
            And I, unlike you, do not separate myself from Russia. Therefore - yes, ours paid 15mln and OURS took gold on hockey.

            OUR? Ours perform under OUR flag, with OUR anthem, with OUR symbolism! And gold was taken by individuals who came from the Russian Federation.
            1. Loess
              Loess 26 February 2018 13: 15
              +3
              In order to protect the interests of Russia it is not at all necessary to wave attributes with state symbols. The character of a fighter is manifested in overcoming difficulties, and the more difficulties had to be overcome for the sake of victory, the more valuable the victory. So, no matter how much you squander from this, but OUR athletes performed at the Olympics, and the victories of these athletes are the victories of Russia.
              1. AUL
                AUL 26 February 2018 14: 28
                +3
                Quote: Less
                In order to protect the interests of Russia it is not at all necessary to wave attributes with state symbols. The character of a fighter is manifested in ...
                Less, I was surprised that I heard such arguments from you.
              2. Z_G_R
                Z_G_R 26 February 2018 15: 55
                +7
                The question here is not that it is necessary to swing something, but in humiliation for the country. A country exists as long as it has a flag and an anthem. Without this, it is only a territory with people. And this fact of humiliation cannot be called a victory, as you don’t whitewash him in the media. This is a complete failure.
              3. New Year day
                New Year day 26 February 2018 20: 42
                +5
                Quote: Less
                but OUR athletes performed at the Olympics, and the victories of these athletes are the victories of Russia.

                our lieutenant. and your business traders
    2. Monster_Fat
      Monster_Fat 26 February 2018 09: 21
      +12
      Yes, with drugs at the embassy, ​​"this is something with something," and most importantly, "silent." So much heroin and silence!
      Probably, they’re thinking how to explain another “ichtamnet” ....
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2018 09: 54
        +2
        Ha, drugs are just a criminal business. Pulling him to officials is stupid.
        We can talk about the low quality of staff, only who is ready to be a convict? Who are we so white and fluffy?
    3. SPACE
      SPACE 26 February 2018 09: 56
      +9
      Quote: Gardamir
      Here are the "merits" of the current government.
      Olympics, the country is prohibited from performing under its own symbols. Isn't that humiliation?
      The killing of Russians in Syria.

      And you give Crimea, hand over Abkhazia, Donbass and Syria, reduce nuclear weapons and you will be happy, sanctions will be lifted, the flag will be allowed at the Olympics ... fool
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 26 February 2018 10: 07
        +14
        And you give Crimea, surrender to Abkhazia, Donbass and Syria, reduce nuclear weapons and you will be happy,
        Throw out the TV and use your own gray matter. There is a redistribution around the world. And these would hold onto power waving rags in front of the electorate, distracting from pressing problems.
        1. SPACE
          SPACE 26 February 2018 10: 17
          +7
          Quote: Gardamir
          Throw out the TV and use your own gray matter. There is a redistribution around the world. And these would hold onto power waving rags in front of the electorate, distracting from pressing problems.

          Have you used your gray matter at least once in your life?
          Quote: Gardamir
          There is a redistribution around the world

          Redistribution of the world, oh how! What did you call a rag? So what to do with Crimea? What about a patriot?
          1. Gardamir
            Gardamir 26 February 2018 16: 02
            +4
            Have you used your gray matter at least once in your life?
            from the category himself such or just troll always, troll everywhere ..?
            So what to do with Crimea?
            and with pensioners?
      2. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2018 10: 25
        +6
        Yes, yes, and then they will tear the skin, for the sake of democratic values, is it not a pity?
        I, if you lose the skin you need to understand for scho. for democratic and liberal is not ready, no way!
  16. Vasya Vassin
    Vasya Vassin 26 February 2018 09: 29
    +7
    Vova, make a non-standard move, go lie down on the stove and do not shine until you yourself are thrown out of the Kremlin, like the Poles in troubled times.
  17. Aleksandr21
    Aleksandr21 26 February 2018 09: 34
    +14
    For example, the quality of articles in the Analytics section is very low at VO, this applies not only to this article but to others as a whole. Analysts in fact and not, for example, I really like Yakov Kedmi as an analyst (although this does not apply to VO), or Andrey from Chelyabinsk (already ours with VO) who has an excellent series of articles on the topics of our Navy, and then you go to the section either cheers-patriotic articles in which from analytics and a real picture of the world like to the moon on foot, or the opinion of the author who is not particularly an analyst, I apologize for something off-topic but really boiling, the quality of analytics at VO has fallen dramatically over the years.
  18. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 26 February 2018 09: 55
    +15
    laughing How did Putin succeed in foreign policy? No way !!!! Just like in the inside!
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 26 February 2018 10: 11
      +15
      Just like in the inside!
      supporting you add. failures in domestic politics are already visible to the naked eye, so regular propagandists are silent. About foreign policy, you can still lie. But the development of technology, including the Internet, does not allow lying impudently.
      1. SPACE
        SPACE 26 February 2018 10: 38
        +5
        Quote: andrej-shir
        How did Putin succeed in foreign policy? No way !!!! Just like in the inside!

        Quote: Gardamir
        supporting you add. failures in domestic politics are already visible to the naked eye, so regular propagandists are silent.

        Class! With such dips in the brain fool only political failures are left to measure laughing lol
        1. Gardamir
          Gardamir 26 February 2018 16: 04
          +8
          With such dips in the brain
          Did someone insult you? Or as your idol Serebryakov said, rudeness is prettier to you?
  19. BAI
    BAI 26 February 2018 10: 13
    +12
    Russian President Vladimir Putin goes from one success to another. Almost all of his opponents can no longer notice and recognize this.

    And since 2000, not a single failure? The author is very optimistic.
    1. Monster_Fat
      Monster_Fat 26 February 2018 10: 28
      +13
      "GDP never lies," even when it says that its notorious "decrees" are 93-94% fulfilled. “Chichas” I’ll run to look for millions of high-tech jobs created in Russia — not all 100%, but the very 93-94%.
      1. Antivirus2k
        Antivirus2k 26 February 2018 17: 18
        +12
        About the May decrees, implemented at 95% - this is generally such a trash. I won’t ask anyone, everyone was in the 5% corridor. Wow, how unlucky.
  20. cats
    cats 26 February 2018 10: 19
    +6
    Thank you Yuri for not being afraid to get dirty. Now, few argue with shortsighted commentators, it’s dirty and useless. They even remembered drugs at the embassy .. laughing Who is for silverfish, who is simply poisonous in life. Strength to you, patience and more such articles. hi
    1. dSK
      dSK 27 February 2018 00: 26
      0
      Yura is growing before our eyes. The truth will always win, our president is Orthodox and b / p, Russia will be reborn.
  21. Altona
    Altona 26 February 2018 10: 43
    +4
    Quote: B.T.W.
    A.S. Sulakshin was a member of the EBN administration, was his adviser, then he had no questions for the current president at that time ?!

    --------------------------
    I am aware, nevertheless, such questions are being asked, at least from this angle, at least in a different way. All 4 questions can be summed up in this way: what if the West begins to simultaneously press on all fronts — military, informational, financial, political?
    1. Captain45
      Captain45 26 February 2018 11: 54
      +2
      Quote: Altona
      What if the West begins to simultaneously press on all fronts - military, informational, financial, political?

      We will fight until diarrhea laughing but we won’t give up. We’ll go into the woods like the Lykovs lol
    2. You Vlad
      You Vlad 26 February 2018 18: 29
      +2
      Quote: Altona
      What if the West begins to simultaneously press on all fronts - military, informational, financial, political?

      And that this is not happening right now? belay Well, I do not know..
  22. Altona
    Altona 26 February 2018 10: 47
    +3
    Quote: Aleksandr21
    For example, the quality of articles in the Analytics section is very low at VO, this applies not only to this article but to others as a whole. Analysts in fact and not, for example, I really like Yakov Kedmi as an analyst (although this does not apply to VO), or Andrey from Chelyabinsk (already ours with VO) who has an excellent series of articles on the topics of our Navy, and then you go to the section either cheers-patriotic articles in which from analytics and a real picture of the world like to the moon on foot, or the opinion of the author who is not particularly an analyst, I apologize for something off-topic but really boiling, the quality of analytics at VO has fallen dramatically over the years.

    -----------------------------
    In the comments, the analyst continues if the opponents do not slip into the arguments "well, what?" and "what is the bazaar about?" Someone thinks linearly, someone nonlinearly. It is clear that the “main candidate” has already won the election and therefore voters have the right to ask all the questions still on this shore and look for answers to them, knowing the potential tricks and answers of the “main candidate”.
    1. Aleksandr21
      Aleksandr21 26 February 2018 11: 20
      +14
      Quote: Altona

      In the comments, the analyst continues if the opponents do not slip into the arguments "well, what?" and "what is the bazaar about?" Someone thinks linearly, someone nonlinearly. It is clear that the “main candidate” has already won the election and therefore voters have the right to ask all the questions still on this shore and look for answers to them, knowing the potential tricks and answers of the “main candidate”.


      Not always unfortunately, for 1-2 good comments there are 7-8 in which we will tear all of them there and kill with checkers (figuratively of course), but somehow. Take for example this article, the headline "How Putin, having destroyed templates, achieved success in foreign policy," probably there should be analytics and facts on the foreign policy of our state in the articles, but there is nothing like that. Or take articles on military topics, if the article is about the Ukrainian Armed Forces or about NATO, the United States, then for the place of the language of statistics and facts, we prevail in the articles emotional subtext, I generally keep silent about the commentary on such articles. Recently there was news / an article on the VO "The US Navy received a second expeditionary base ship" and when reading comments you understand that there will be no sensible discussion of this news, I liked Staroy26's comment there, I will quote him as a quote:
      “I am always touched by the ability of comrades in VO to reduce everything to“ lowering below the baseboard ”, if you don’t have one, but the enemy has it, then the enemy has a gun, a floating spike, etc. If we have, and the enemy has no (such as Sevmorput) - this is a masterpiece of shipbuilding ... "

      and so we have unfortunately in everything that in the comments that in the analytics, of course there isn’t something interesting occurs both in discussions and in articles, but alas, most of it.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. BAI
          BAI 26 February 2018 14: 10
          +2
          Not only.
          1. BAI
            BAI 26 February 2018 17: 28
            +2
            Where is the previous picture of Delhi, to which I attached my own?
  23. Chichikov
    Chichikov 26 February 2018 11: 12
    +8
    Liberals, opposition, human rights defenders and guides of NFOs - unite! Otherwise, the comments of these "fighters for Russia" can not be called!

    Something is being compared there, “guarded” banners are being stuck in, complaining about the difficulties of life ... - well, they don’t like the fact that Russia, difficult, even contrary to all the “Wishlist”, regains its place in the world leader list, regains its independence and ability to fight back interventions from outside! And it turns in the language: - "How much is opium for the people, gentlemen, all-propagators"?
    1. groks
      groks 26 February 2018 12: 17
      +15
      Let's decide. Liberals are the president and the government. The opposition is also liberals, which is cool. It seems that they do not need to unite and Navalny from the very beginning receives a salary from the Kremlin. What else is there? Human rights activists? Is that the old lady with whom the president kisses her hands for pissing him in slippers?
      1. twviewer
        twviewer 26 February 2018 13: 04
        0
        No, it’s the liberals, she (a US citizen) kissed his hands for what he bestows and sends grants,
        Quote: groks
        for the fact that she pisses him in sneakers
      2. Chichikov
        Chichikov 26 February 2018 14: 35
        +6
        Quote: groks
        Let's decide.

        Let's!
        Ideological liberalism - proclaims the rights and freedoms of each person as the highest value and establishes them as the legal basis of social and economic order.
        Practical liberalism - under the pretext of striving for rights and freedoms, it is fighting for power, opposing established traditions, history, religion and the state as a whole!
        1. groks
          groks 26 February 2018 15: 00
          +5
          And it is possible easier.
          "It’s hard for me to imagine what an unemployed person can have" personal freedom ... "
  24. Gorbatiy
    Gorbatiy 26 February 2018 11: 17
    +15
    We are grateful to Putin. So many brains and money never flowed to us in the USA.
    1. Antivirus2k
      Antivirus2k 26 February 2018 17: 16
      +10
      Exactly. And at the same time, the West recognizes Naebulin as the best head of the Central Bank, distributes awards to her, and then Putin declares how wonderful she is. In my opinion, it was time to understand that if the West praises whom, it is either their direct agents or those who work in the interests of the West.
    2. You Vlad
      You Vlad 26 February 2018 19: 35
      +2
      Quote: Gorbatiy
      We are grateful to Putin. So many brains and money never flowed to us in the USA.

      Its not request
  25. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 26 February 2018 11: 28
    +18
    Over the past 15 years, Russia has received 3,5 trillion dollars only for oil.
    Three and a half trillion dollars. . Is it okay if we add 3,5 to these 1,5 for gas, wood and other trifles? Any objections? Do you think 1,5 is a lot? And it seems to me that even somehow is not enough, but let it be. For an even account. Total 5 trillions.
    5 000 000 000 000 dollars.
    Five trillion dollars, guys. It was possible to demolish all residential buildings, including chicken coops and cowsheds, to zero and rebuild the entire housing stock with this money. Generally all, understand? And to wash it would remain.
    With this money, it was possible to create high-tech industries and reanimate entire branches of heavy and medium-sized mechanical engineering and the chemical industry.
    It would be possible to revive both air and shipbuilding; build roads; to raise agriculture, with its most powerful scientific base; create an effective system of health care, education ...
    However, none of this has been done.
    Five trillion dollars partially stolen, partially eaten, partially stupidly pissed off ......
    1. SPACE
      SPACE 26 February 2018 12: 24
      +8
      Quote: Denis Obukhov
      Over the past 15 years, Russia has received 3,5 trillion dollars only for oil.
      Three and a half trillion dollars. . Is it okay if we add 3,5 to these 1,5 for gas, wood and other trifles? Any objections? Do you think 1,5 is a lot? And it seems to me that even somehow is not enough, but let it be. For an even account. Total 5 trillions.
      5 000 000 000 000 dollars.

      40 000 000 pensioners, every month everyone should receive 13000 rubles or about 260 $, multiply everything by 12 months and 15 years, subtracts from your numbers. Roughly of course, but add other social benefits, a defense industry there ...
      1. groks
        groks 26 February 2018 13: 37
        +6
        This is demagoguery. It is understood that the whole country should sit with its arms folded, and build and rebuild some external forces? In fact, the need for imports would start to decline almost immediately, and where it would be from where to get money for social programs, and at the end of the process, the sale of hydrocarbons would become uncritical and one could begin to fasten the faucet.
        1. SPACE
          SPACE 26 February 2018 14: 10
          +5
          Quote: groks
          This is demagoguery.

          You are probably for the post which is higher? Are you blind Or have they mixed up demagogy with mathematics? Are you a victim of the exam? Ahh that was probably the title of your comment.
          1. groks
            groks 26 February 2018 14: 39
            +9
            No need to fool around. If production is restored, the country will become self-sufficient and it will be possible not to sell hydrocarbons at all. Or sell only to friends.
            1. SPACE
              SPACE 26 February 2018 16: 51
              +7
              Quote: groks
              If production is restored, the country will become

              And who will restore it? Are you Pushkin? And How? You won’t even be able to produce kettles and consumer goods, everything is littered with China at prices below ridiculous and who is so smart, where do you take the money to build these plants, and even without corruption, who is he the honest one who can compete with Made in China? And also I wonder who will buy your muin? How do you make people? Or will the party issue an order under the salary in kind? Sight and gold reserves and any other moneyfool This is easy for Grudinin, old ladies and idiots to hang noodles do not toss bags.
              Quote: groks
              self-sufficient

              You go to the village and try to live self-sufficient, and we will see how long you have enough and how quickly you completely degrade.
              Naivety is on the verge of stupidity.
              Quote: groks
              No need to fool around

              Better you fool around.
              Z.Y. Cooks and all other idiots categorically must not be allowed to rule the state! "Fools" are worse than Hitler.
    2. marline
      marline 26 February 2018 13: 41
      +2
      That really is. Let's build roads for 5 trillion dollars.
      Only now you know, there is such a nasty feeling that there will be no more roads in the country and they will not be better. And if, nevertheless, it becomes bigger and better, then obviously not by much. But the cost of one kilometer of the roadway will increase significantly.
      But it will be so! And here is why, I suggest you think.
  26. Radikal
    Radikal 26 February 2018 13: 56
    +8
    He does not lie to his people and is always responsible for the words spoken, even if it is not entirely convenient for him.
    This is strong! The author has surpassed all his previous creations! Hearing this, I wanted to do something like that, such .... Put your hand on the headdress for example soldier , or send your “combat” ones to him for the “election” campaign, you never know - suddenly they have problems with “this”! wassat
  27. flicker
    flicker 26 February 2018 14: 21
    +5
    The example of the modern United States has become a textbook today. Not Russia, in fact, destroys their world hegemony, but their own lies and unprincipledness.
    What is today, surprisingly, true - until recently, the lies and unprincipledness of the most powerful information resources could conceal the aggressive essence of the United States. Everyone was told that the states bring peace, help the triumph of democracy throughout the world. Now, as Trump said during the election campaign, the whole world already hates the United States. The same Trump about CNN: I hate your network, everyone on CNN is liars, and you should be ashamed. "
    Putin ... who also distinguishes the Russian president from his colleagues, but on which none of them likes to draw attention. He does not lie to his people and is always responsible for the words spoken, even if it is not entirely convenient for him.
    But today the image of a truthful and sincere person works both personally for Putin and for Russia. They are trusted and this faith often helps to solve those problems that could never have been solved in another way.
    Now, the most amazing thing is that Putin expresses his sincere position, and “not good global politicians and the media” see this as Putin’s next trick. yes Article plus, precisely noticed and pronounced.
    1. groks
      groks 26 February 2018 15: 06
      +6
      Like any politician, Putin expresses the opinion of the group of people who stand behind him and in whose interests he acts. Sincerity and politics? Haha three times.
      1. flicker
        flicker 26 February 2018 15: 36
        +5
        Putin expresses the opinion of the group of people who stand behind him and in whose interests he acts.
        What kind of band? How did the group appear, on the basis of chance, or something united them? Is Putin part of a group or a group in itself, and Putin in itself? Why did the group nominate Putin? And finally, can it be that the personal opinion of the representative of the group coincides with the opinion of the group?
        1. groks
          groks 26 February 2018 16: 46
          +4
          Well, who will tell you this .... Even the fact that at first there was a fly, does not mean that Putin was nominated by the EBN “family”.
          Here is the option "Putin by himself" completely disappears. These do not happen, they are not needed, they are either shot, or they are also a fly-fly. The last question is not entirely intelligible - but what for then a group? Although it may not coincide at all, the main thing is that the text does not confuse and express emotions normally.
          1. flicker
            flicker 26 February 2018 17: 26
            +4
            The last question is not entirely intelligible.
            To make it clearer ("more intelligible"): for example, a Jew expressed his opinion, for example this: Jerusalem is the capital of Israel - while a group of Jews expressed the same opinion independently: Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. Question: did he express his opinion or the opinion of a group of Jews?
            I hope it has become so "intelligible"?
      2. cats
        cats 27 February 2018 06: 32
        +3
        Quote: groks
        Like any politician, Putin expresses the opinion of the group of people who stand behind him and in whose interests he acts. Sincerity and politics? Haha three times.

        Yes, but this group of people, this is a large part of the population, the one that does not cry, does not throw impurities on the fan, but calmly pulls its strap. Not everyone is still bored, the majority understands that there would be no war, and the rest is everyone's concern. If you are jealous, if you feel like it and you are ill, then what does Putin have to do with it? hi
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        Over the past 15 years, Russia has received 3,5 trillion dollars only for oil.
        Three and a half trillion dollars. . Is it okay if we add 3,5 to these 1,5 for gas, wood and other trifles? Any objections? Do you think 1,5 is a lot? And it seems to me that even somehow is not enough, but let it be. For an even account. Total 5 trillions.
        5 000 000 000 000 dollars.
        Five trillion dollars, guys. It was possible to demolish all residential buildings, including chicken coops and cowsheds, to zero and rebuild the entire housing stock with this money. Generally all, understand? And to wash it would remain.
        With this money, it was possible to create high-tech industries and reanimate entire branches of heavy and medium-sized mechanical engineering and the chemical industry.
        It would be possible to revive both air and shipbuilding; build roads; to raise agriculture, with its most powerful scientific base; create an effective system of health care, education ...
        However, none of this has been done.
        Five trillion dollars partially stolen, partially eaten, partially stupidly pissed off ......

        Have you tried to buy toilet paper for the entire salary? laughing
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. The comment was deleted.
    1. Chichikov
      Chichikov 26 February 2018 15: 50
      +2
      Quote: Westfshoke
      in Ukraine, the media is private and can say whatever they want

      All the "private and free" media in Ukraine have long been defeated. This, even in the West, is not spoken only by politicians. In reality, the same Gordon speaks roughly like this - in Ukraine there are only media outlets controlled by PaShenko. So, they say they will be all they say!
      Well, the rating of PARAShenko - do not anger the new wave of maydanschiki and do not make the citizens of Ukraine laugh!
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Antivirus2k
          Antivirus2k 26 February 2018 17: 12
          +2
          About the media do not carry nonsense. What is the "propaganda of separatism"? Kotsaba, who was against the war - is it a "separatist" and a "padded jacket"? Guzhva, whose independent online media is a quilted jacket and a separatist? Are Vasilets and Timonin “quilted jackets” and “separatists”? Ignited "Inter" was for what? The blockade of NewsWan for saying "Maidan is not a revolution, but a coup" - is this normal? You at least read the criminal cases of those journalists who were imprisoned in Ukraine, so as not to look like a complete ram.
          1. The comment was deleted.
  30. turbris
    turbris 26 February 2018 15: 57
    0
    Varyag_0711,
    And for some reason I completely agree with you.
  31. The comment was deleted.
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. Antivirus2k
    Antivirus2k 26 February 2018 17: 06
    +9
    I do not know what "success" is in the understanding of those who see it. Well, let's count. Success in Syria? Well, such a half. On the one hand, they did not allow Syria to completely collapse, following the example of Libya, on the other hand, the United States settled there on oil fields and are clearly not going to leave. Success in Ukraine? Partial again. Crimea, thank God, has been saved from the Nazis, but the DPR and LPR are frankly draining, and the rest of Ukraine is turning into a terrible Russophobic dump. Need to talk about the Olympics? Is it necessary to speak about the fact that there was not a single country in the EU that was outraged against sanctions (but only one country is enough)? In fact, success is only in the Chinese direction, and even because China does not want to have an enemy in the north, an enemy overseas is enough for them. In general, when there is nothing to boast about, they talk about some insignificant successes there, inflating them to an incredible level. Well, the standard argument is right there: "And remember, as it was in the 90s ...". Yes, I remember, and I also remember how it was in the days of the USSR. And by the way, I remember that 90 years have passed since the 18s !!!
  34. gladcu2
    gladcu2 26 February 2018 17: 37
    +2
    Lying always leads to degradation. There will be no development. Therefore, one cannot lie at the level of the president. The country will decline.

    The military and the industrialists know. Once a lie has been made, there will be problems.

    Therefore, the army left the appeal — comrades.
  35. yehat
    yehat 26 February 2018 17: 56
    +12
    as long as Putin goes from success to success, and we go inexplicably, China is doing business
    here are examples
    while we are sawing so much, the high-tech center of Zhangjian is operating with profit in China in Shanghai
    while we are building 1 large bridge to the Crimea 19 km with reliance on islands and shallows, China has already built a 36-kilometer bridge in Hangzhou and a bunch of large bridges with a total mileage of more than 1000 km.
    while we are proudly building the T50, China has already completed 3 projects of the 5th generation and 1 has been adopted
    while we proudly build outdated and expensive electronics, China is increasing the global share of modern components produced in this industry to almost half.
    while our Central Bank is ruining banks and the economy, Kit makes Yuan not only convertible, but also a reserve currency.
    While Sobyanin is laying down tiles, rebuilding the center and expanding the sidewalks in Moscow, the world's first green eco-city Tianjin is being built in China and several more simpler projects.

    everything is clear to everyone, how is our country losing or another hundred examples from China to cite?

    and Putin continues to move from success to success ...
    1. SPACE
      SPACE 26 February 2018 21: 42
      +5
      Quote: yehat
      everything is clear to everyone, how is our country losing or another hundred examples from China to cite?

      Probably because in China there are no people like you, they stayed on Tianaymin Square ...
      1. yehat
        yehat 27 February 2018 10: 59
        +3
        unlike the students in tian en myn, I know exactly what I am saying and what I want.
        do not confuse riots and political views.
        and it’s strange that you didn’t mention much more recent riots in Hong Kong or in Moscow on the swamp - they are very similar to what you mentioned.
  36. The comment was deleted.
  37. Radikal
    Radikal 26 February 2018 18: 10
    +4
    Quote: SPACE
    Quote: groks
    If production is restored, the country will become

    And who will restore it? Are you Pushkin? And How? You won’t even be able to produce kettles and consumer goods, everything is littered with China at prices below ridiculous and who is so smart, where do you take the money to build these plants, and even without corruption, who is he the honest one who can compete with Made in China? And also I wonder who will buy your muin? How do you make people? Or will the party issue an order under the salary in kind? Sight and gold reserves and any other moneyfool This is easy for Grudinin, old ladies and idiots to hang noodles do not toss bags.
    Quote: groks
    self-sufficient

    You go to the village and try to live self-sufficient, and we will see how long you have enough and how quickly you completely degrade.
    Naivety is on the verge of stupidity.
    Quote: groks
    No need to fool around

    Better you fool around.
    Z.Y. Cooks and all other idiots categorically must not be allowed to rule the state! "Fools" are worse than Hitler.

    And it’s not them - “cooks and all the others” won the Great Patriotic War? Such u_ro_d_ov as you need to push in zara_dyshe! sad
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. cats
      cats 27 February 2018 06: 41
      +3
      Those who pulled out this war do not go into politics, and people like you are drunk in the face.
      [i] [/ i] mom I fell in love with the radical .. for what daughter? .. winked
  38. Radikal
    Radikal 26 February 2018 18: 12
    +2
    Quote: gladcu2
    Lying always leads to degradation. There will be no development. Therefore, one cannot lie at the level of the president. The country will decline.

    The military and the industrialists know. Once a lie has been made, there will be problems.

    Therefore, the army left the appeal — comrades.

    "In the garden of elderberry, and in ....... lol
  39. Sewer krainiy
    Sewer krainiy 26 February 2018 20: 49
    0
    Quote: yehat
    And I have a question - when the Russian Federation was more alone - when did Yeltsin "be friends" with everyone, or now?

    Russia and the republics of the USSR became lonely when Yeltsin collapsed the Soviet Union .... and now ... wait and see, we’ll break out after March 18 ...
  40. Sewer krainiy
    Sewer krainiy 26 February 2018 20: 54
    +1
    Quote: Westfshoke
    Complete nonsense, they don’t say anything in the West, Gordon, who is this?
    You confuse the rogue of some cotton media for propaganda of separatism and financing from Russia, but any channel in Ukraine can criticize Poroshenko without problems.

    The collar was weakened, but the bowl was also set aside ... as they say, shallow Emelya, your week. But I want to eat ...
  41. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 26 February 2018 21: 15
    +7
    When the oil and gas field was discovered in Qatar, one Bedouin in 35 years made the country's population one of the richest in the world. We found oil, gas, gold, platinum, diamonds and the entire periodic table. One can’t just find the Bedouin himself - for some reason they aren’t found here.
  42. The comment was deleted.
  43. Andrew67
    Andrew67 27 February 2018 02: 10
    +2
    Quote: freddyk
    Quote: Nyrobsky
    Maybe then you will be able to list the failures in foreign policy?


    Ukraine is a complete failure. And our brothers really live there ... ... sisters, who have parents. And what about Syria, yes to me exactly on it. You do not need only slogans about the fight against terrorism. there are fighting for the interests of the gas and oil mafia.

    This must be so narrow minded
  44. a.sirin
    a.sirin 27 February 2018 02: 54
    +2
    Success in foreign policy is an increase in the number of allies. You can call them conditionally "friends." Not only and not so much "partners" as sympathizers, who quite often share the views and, if you want, the values ​​of Russia.
    In fact, it’s just the opposite.
    This simple question begs: did Germany have a “successful” foreign policy in early 1941? It seems to be a cascade of victories of the "German weapon" ...
    Only now call that state externally. Somehow Germany’s policy doesn’t succeed - almost all the leading states are rapidly moving away from the “winner”
    1. cats
      cats 27 February 2018 06: 48
      +2
      Quote: a.sirin
      Success in foreign policy is an increase in the number of allies. You can call them conditionally "friends." Not only and not so much "partners" as sympathizers, who quite often share the views and, if you want, the values ​​of Russia.

      What you are talking about is called prostitution, it's to the Balts.
      Quote: a.sirin
      This simple question begs: did Germany have a “successful” foreign policy in early 1941? It seems to be a cascade of victories of the "German weapon" ...
      Only now call that state externally. Somehow Germany’s policy doesn’t succeed - almost all the leading states are rapidly moving away from the “winner”

      And here you are generally warm and soft confused. hi
  45. Gorbatiy
    Gorbatiy 27 February 2018 06: 15
    +2
    Quote: you Vlad
    Quote: Gorbatiy
    We are grateful to Putin. So many brains and money never flowed to us in the USA.

    Its not request

    And you have nothing left to do, just joke. Get involved.
    1. You Vlad
      You Vlad 27 February 2018 10: 17
      0
      Quote: Gorbatiy
      And you have nothing left to do, just joke. Get involved.

      It’s you joking! And I’m saying it as it is! They will take your internship and return when Russia calls! Yes, you too will race, only I wouldn’t let people like you into the country. You are migratory birds ...
  46. Varyag71
    Varyag71 27 February 2018 10: 47
    +2
    [quote = Z_G_R] I did not watch the Olympics in principle. And he would not extol the victory of hockey players, they showed their level in Sochi. Therefore, knowing that the strongest wouldn’t come to Korea, they were so eager to go there) Well done, of course, they won, but really if you think about who they won? =) The 18th day will come and I will vote for Grudinin, and not for the oligarchs in power) Putin will surely win, and then spring, summer, autumn will come, and our liberal government will tighten the nuts even tighter. And over time, the Uraputins will decrease here. Life will show everything with time) [/ quot
    Especially when all life will be spent on biometric data. Although, I think they will be very happy to shove biochips into themselves with the thought of the great president who raised the country.
  47. Varyag71
    Varyag71 27 February 2018 10: 55
    +2
    Quote: Less
    In order to protect the interests of Russia it is not at all necessary to wave attributes with state symbols. The character of a fighter is manifested in overcoming difficulties, and the more difficulties had to be overcome for the sake of victory, the more valuable the victory. So, no matter how much you squander from this, but OUR athletes performed at the Olympics, and the victories of these athletes are the victories of Russia.

    For me personally, the janitor does more good for the state than these parasite-athletes.
  48. Gorbatiy
    Gorbatiy 27 February 2018 11: 52
    +2
    Quote: you Vlad
    Quote: Gorbatiy
    And you have nothing left to do, just joke. Get involved.

    It’s you joking! And I’m saying it as it is! They will take your internship and return when Russia calls! Yes, you too will race, only I wouldn’t let people like you into the country. You are migratory birds ...

    Oh yoy yoy. Nekrasov is resting. Poor Russians! What are they doing with you ........
  49. Varyag71
    Varyag71 27 February 2018 13: 17
    +2
    Pesticides, hormones, antibiotics ... All this is found today in raw meat and meat products, which are sold in stores even under the most famous brands. But even greater danger lies in microbes: in legs and barbecue salmonella, Listeria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and “Escherichia coli” “await you”.

    On the menu - antibiotics for every taste

    The experts of the national research center "Roskontrol" checked the quality of chicken, which is sold in stores. To do this, they took frozen chicken hearts, which are sold under well-known brands. And almost everyone found either dangerous microorganisms or antibiotics.

    By the way, experts from Roskontrol find microbes and antimicrobials in almost all meat products that they took for research. Starting from semi-finished products (sausages, minced meat, meatballs, barbecue) and ending with raw meat (chicken, chicken legs and whole broiler carcasses).

    Very often, producers “chemize” even with a mass of meat: to artificially increase it, they inject a special brine that contains moisture-retaining components. These are carrageenan, gum, starch, plant and collagen animal proteins, and sometimes even phosphates (the latter, by the way, are part of the washing powder). Although some manufacturers on the packaging even indicate large: "No injection." They are lying!

    Hormones and antibiotics are found in meat products (the most common are bacitracin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol). They are given to animals during rearing to accelerate growth and prevent disease. But in the finished product on the counter, of course, they should not be. If they are, then the initial dose of antibiotics was prohibitive.

    Antibiotics that come to a person along with food, cause severe allergic reactions, inhibit a person’s own microflora. And most importantly, they increase the resistance of pathogenic bacteria to antibiotics prescribed by a doctor. That is, when a person becomes ill, then treatment may simply be ineffective.





    Garnished with Salmonella and Listeria

    In chicken hearts, which were examined by experts of Roskontrol, they found harmful microorganisms. The same ones that are treated with antibiotics in factories. Apparently, they are struggling badly! Moreover, earlier Roskontrol detected dangerous microbes in many other meat products.

    One of the main indicators, which allows us to indirectly judge the safety of products, is KMAFAnM (the number of mesophilic aerobic and optionally anaerobic microorganisms). They are also called sanitary-indicative microorganisms, the most famous of which is E. coli. Many of its strains (species) can cause intestinal infections.

    Escherichia coli inhabit the intestines of humans and animals. Where can they appear in the finished meat? This means that sanitary rules and manufacturing technology were violated, as well as the timing and temperature regimes of storage, transportation and sale of food products.

    Another harmful "side dish" for chicken is salmonella, rod-shaped bacteria, which also cause intestinal infection.

    After severe forms of the disease, an infectious toxic shock, liver and heart failure, and biliary and urinary tract infections are possible. But even if the disease was mild, the body still needs some time to restore water-salt metabolism, normal absorption of nutrients and strengthen immunity.

    Take care of yourself?

    But not even Salmonella is as dangerous as another “guest” at poultry farms - Listeria. Rod-shaped bacteria, which are pathogens of animals and humans.





    Listeria is stored for a long time in soil, water, feed, and the bodies of dead animals. The source of infection can be cattle, ungulates and wild animals. But still, the main carrier of Listeria is rodents (mice and rats), and if they are in meat, it means that the company rudely violated sanitary and anti-epidemic standards.

    Moreover, listeria persist for a long time even in food products, including those packaged in barrier (vacuum) films. Given that they can get into a food product at any stage of production, the infection is almost guaranteed to the buyer!

    Listeria is especially dangerous for young children, people with reduced immunity, the elderly and pregnant women (they can cause pathologies in the fetus and miscarriage).

    Salmonella and Listeria survive the freeze perfectly - they are not afraid of the freezer! Only high temperatures help fight them. Moreover, the meat should in no case be in contact with products that are not exposed to temperature. For example, if you cut a raw chicken infected with salmonella with a knife, and then chopped vegetables with the same knife, then there is a very high probability of getting sick.

    Professor Edelev: in the poultry industry - a systemic crisis

    Why is it now becoming dangerous to buy meat products in Russia? The Free Press talked about this with our permanent expert, Professor Dmitry Edelev, one of the leaders of the Center for Applied Medicine and Food Safety at Moscow State University.

    - As many violations as were detected by Roskontrol in the case of chicken offal - hearts - I rarely see at the same time.

    Violation of safety requirements in two of three samples according to microbiological indicators: the presence of L. monocytogenes (Listeria), salmonella, the presence of Escherichia coli bacteria, exceeding the acceptable level by the number of mesophilic aerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms and total bacterial contamination, antimicrobial chemotherapeutic agents (and by popular - antibiotics) the presence of pericardial bags, blood clots in the package, a discrepancy with labeling for the content of fat and protein.


    Such a large number of violations that are dangerous to health, and often life-threatening. Moreover, the offal of broiler chickens is an inexpensive and universal semi-finished product. From it you can cook soup, fry, stew and, finally, bake. There are many recipes and the price does not bite.

    Unfortunately, this is not the first test with similar results. I want to remind you that in January 2018, Roskontrol checked chicken semi-finished products - a chilled thigh of broiler chickens with skin. At the same time, almost half of the samples were recognized and rejected, and a violation of the labeling was detected in 12 of 13 samples.

    Mass violations identified by Roskontrol may indicate a systemic crisis in the industry, non-compliance with poultry growing technology, violations of sanitary rules and the technology for the production of semi-finished products, the timing and temperature of transportation, storage and sale of food products.

    Correction of systemic violations - apparently, the process is long and we have little predictability. Therefore, for those who consume poultry and are not ready to give up dietary meat, I can advise: avoid contact of raw meat with prepared food, after cutting the chicken thoroughly wash with detergents and disinfectants all that it came into contact with - hands, cutting board, knives.

    Thoroughly heat the bird, because Salmonella die at a temperature of 75 degrees (inside the product) within 10-15 minutes. Therefore, you have to give up kebabs. And last, the greatest danger from the use of low-quality offal from poultry are elderly people, patients and children.
    1. Varyag71
      Varyag71 27 February 2018 13: 19
      +2
      This is one of the best evidence of our ruling elite. Here it is, your import substitution, the rise of agriculture. The same rise in all areas!
  50. kig
    kig 28 February 2018 02: 24
    0
    It is absolutely true, and his greatest success is the creation of a deeply hostile state right behind our doorstep. This refers to Ukraine, if someone does not understand.