Military Review

Promising Russian helicopter will be presented in two versions

26
The Russian promising high-speed helicopter is being developed both in the classic version with the crew on board and in the unmanned version, reports TASS a message from the head of the national research institute for onboard radio-electronic equipment and aircraft armament of the Central Research Institute of the Air Force of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Pavel Schavelev.




The helicopter of the future will be in two versions: this is the classic version with a pilot, crew on board and unmanned helicopter complexes that will interact with manned complexes that will also act in the interests of the Ground Forces,
said Schavelev on the channel "Star".

Earlier, the general director of Rostec, Sergey Chemezov, informed the agency that a prototype of a promising high-speed combat helicopter developed by the Russian Helicopters holding company (included in Rostec) in the interests of the Russian Defense Ministry would make its first flight in 2019.

According to him, the maximum speed of the new machine will exceed 400 km / h.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 25 February 2018 14: 14
    +11
    The helicopter of the future will be in two versions: this is a classic version with a pilot, crew on board and unmanned helicopter systems,
    A command machine with a man and direct drummers without pilots will be very promising ... God forbid ...
    1. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 25 February 2018 14: 20
      +5
      The helicopter will feel serious ... It's high time!
    2. Genry
      Genry 25 February 2018 15: 42
      +6
      I’ll insert a topic-related video.
  2. Magic archer
    Magic archer 25 February 2018 14: 25
    +3
    And where is the promised Killer Whale ?? We have a lot of projects, but nothing comes to the real execution!
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 25 February 2018 14: 47
      +2
      Long closed.

      Now they are doing 62. With Turbomekh and Zoekler. But judging by the fact that the main customers within the country have already financed Augusta's screwdriver assembly and concluded a contract.

      And also just an incredibly loaded flight test program:
      15 February 2018 year in Arsenyev (Primorsky Krai) as if committed The second full-fledged test flight The first prototype (OP-1) of the Ka-62 helicopter. Any evidence of the second Ka-62 flight is not yet available in Russian sources.

      The first flight prototype OP-1 (serial number 97876210101) of the Ka-62 helicopter built by PJSC Arsenyev Aviation Company Progress named after N.I. Sazykina "holding" Helicopters of Russia "(part of the State Corporation" Rostec "), performed the first hang 28 April 2016 year, and made the first full profile flight in Arseniev on 25 on May 2017 of the year. Since flights on OP-1 were not made.

      Second Flight Prototype Ka-62 OP-2, built by AAK "Progress", was publicly demonstrated 6-7 September 2017 year, but so far has not taken to the air.


      The project is bent.
      1. Magic archer
        Magic archer 25 February 2018 15: 01
        +2
        That's what I’m talking about. There are still no middle class helicopters in the country. And all the tasks have to be solved with the good old Mi-8 (18). And it didn’t go beyond prototypes.
        1. av58
          av58 25 February 2018 17: 07
          0
          Why did you decide so? 38th flies in a series.
          1. donavi49
            donavi49 25 February 2018 19: 11
            0
            38 - not in a series, but the construction of the 1 serial helicopter was launched as part of the installation batch.

            It is bigger than Mi-8, heavier by 3 tons.

            We are talking about helicopters easier than Mi-8.
        2. fighter angel
          fighter angel 26 February 2018 13: 01
          0
          I quote magik archer: ... "the good old Mi-8 (18)" .. What kind of tasks does the Mi-18- "old, good" solve? If it is not even in mass production, and in the experimental series was not built?
  3. Herculesic
    Herculesic 25 February 2018 14: 30
    +6
    Sometimes it’s better to just do silently! fool When you talk a lot, you won’t get any practical results for a long time! Moreover, we have everything changed a hundred times! Build for a start! Conduct tests, eliminate shortcomings, then show!
    1. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 25 February 2018 14: 51
      +6
      Quote: Herkulesich
      Sometimes it’s better to just do silently! fool When you talk a lot, you won’t get any practical results for a long time! Moreover, we have everything changed a hundred times! Build for a start! Conduct tests, eliminate shortcomings, then show!

      Herculesych, well, they’ve removed it directly from the tongue. I’m already cursing in my soul. Just read - Russia is developing, Russia will create, Russia has begun, etc., etc. I’m reading on the “Picture of the Day” - “Details about the new aircraft carrier for the Navy with the SU-57 are disclosed. God, we’ll spend 10 years on the unfortunate frigates to build one. Less need to be thrashed with the tongue. And right away it’s better.
  4. shuravi
    shuravi 25 February 2018 14: 55
    +4
    Some kind of garbage. There is too much difference between a UAV helicopter and a manned helicopter.
    Both in the layout and in the concept itself.
    Simply put, the crew cannot be pushed into the first, and idiocy and wastefulness can be converted into the unmanned version of the second.
    1. cats
      cats 25 February 2018 15: 15
      +5
      These, as you say, and squanders, are made by the best helicopters in the world, despite the groundless whining of iksperds from the kitchen.
      1. shuravi
        shuravi 25 February 2018 15: 54
        +5
        Quote: Kotovsky
        These, as you say, and squanders, are made by the best helicopters in the world, despite the groundless whining of iksperds from the kitchen.


        If you are from the kitchen, then this is your problem. And I know what I'm talking about.
    2. Chertt
      Chertt 25 February 2018 15: 48
      0
      Quote: shuravi
      There is too much difference between a UAV helicopter and a manned helicopter

      You are certainly right. Probably this refers to the maximum possible unification of nodes and assemblies.
      1. shuravi
        shuravi 25 February 2018 16: 06
        +1
        Quote: Chertt

        You are certainly right. Probably this refers to the maximum possible unification of nodes and assemblies.


        Even with this complexity. Think about it, why is no one trying to remake existing drums in UAVs, why are existing drone UAV shock models pretty much inferior to manned aircraft, both in the LTX and in combat load?
        1. Tsoy
          Tsoy 25 February 2018 18: 14
          0
          Quote: shuravi
          Think about why no one is trying to remake the existing drums in the UAV.


          Shock do not know, but there is a MQ-8C Fire Scout. Based on the Bell 407 multipurpose helicopter.

          1. shuravi
            shuravi 25 February 2018 20: 04
            +1
            Quote: Choi
            Quote: shuravi
            Think about why no one is trying to remake the existing drums in the UAV.


            Shock do not know, but there is a MQ-8C Fire Scout. Based on the Bell 407 multipurpose helicopter.



            Firstly, this is not a shock.
            Secondly, ersatz based on a suitable model.
            Thirdly, marine.
    3. dgonni
      dgonni 25 February 2018 16: 08
      -1
      I completely agree. The question is in different concepts, which leads to completely different layouts and methods of work on the battlefield.
  5. Awaz
    Awaz 25 February 2018 16: 44
    0
    banal Pi Ar in order to justify the cut dough. But they are not Musk and probably only Medvedev and Co. believe them ..
    1. JD1979
      JD1979 25 February 2018 19: 30
      +1
      Quote: AwaZ
      banal Pi Ar in order to justify the cut dough. But they are not Musk and probably only Medvedev and Co. believe them ..

      Did someone ruin the air here? or did I hear?
  6. Under the dome
    Under the dome 25 February 2018 20: 32
    0
    why do you need so many weapons what
    1. Grits
      Grits 26 February 2018 16: 25
      +3
      why do you need so many weapons.
      So that you can pick up those who are "under the dome"
    2. An60
      An60 26 February 2018 19: 36
      0
      And you "penguins"? Have you bought bearded planes?
  7. Urantian
    Urantian 27 February 2018 09: 17
    0
    In about twenty years, tests will begin, they will be tested in another twenty years .., in about ten years it will still go into production ...., in about 50 years they will produce the first experimental batch ....