"Iranian drones take pictures of American aircraft carriers"

45
"Iranian drones photograph American aircraft carriers"


The commander of the Iranian air defense base "Khatam al-Anbiya" Brigadier General Farzad Esmaili said on Tuesday that the radio-controlled Drones Iranian armies and IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps)

make overflights of the US aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf and take photographs of them.

The Iranian commander refuted an article published in the Washington Post newspaper, which stated that the CIA drones had invaded Iran’s airspace and were photographing nuclear facilities. Esmaili argues that the submitted images were probably taken with the help of reconnaissance satellites, and not UAVs - invisible.

Brigadier General Esmaili stressed that there is no such unmanned or manned aircraft that would be capable of violating Iran’s airspace with impunity, and if this happens, its debris will be put on public display.

"One of these drones sought to penetrate into the territory of Iran, and you saw what happened to him," Esmaili said, referring to the American stealth drone "RQ-170 Sentinel", captured on December 4, 2011 by the EW unit of the Iranian Army almost without damage.

6 December 2011, two US officials on condition of anonymity, confirmed that the captured drone belonged to a CIA unit stationed in Afghanistan.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    April 21 2012 09: 02
    The good news is that Iran is not wiping silently from info spitting and outright disinformation from the states, but it spits well and quite far laughing So the staff of bibs do not stock up. But seriously - whoever has whom - this is known to the companions, but there is no smoke without fire laughing
    1. Sergh
      +14
      April 21 2012 09: 17
      The Iranians can be enthusiastically fit, they endure a fierce confrontation, where they also exhaust the enemy in a peculiar way.
      1. Neighbor
        +6
        April 21 2012 10: 30
        EW division of the Iranian Army.
        They planted him - having taken control - Soviet !!!! electronic warfare station. The newest "development" of Ame.ri.co.co.s.ii !!! belay Gy-gy.
        Quote: itr
        Exactly what to rejoice at, well, taking pictures and what if I would sink

        Here you are a little wrong. Since a drone - calmly flies up to the aircraft carriers and photographs them - then our Onyx missiles - just as calmly fly up to them and sink them ..... them. drinks
        + coastal anti-ship systems.
        Here you can say so - there is a confrontation not between Iran and the Amers - but our Russian and Soviet weapons and the Amer - "newest".
        Who will be more effective and stronger. The conclusion - I think - is obvious.
        Amer calculated their losses on the computer - in the event of an invasion of Iran -
        they will be colossal - their losses. drinks
        This is not Libya or Iraq. Everything is serious there! There are no oranges - there is nobody to ruin their country with their paws.
        1. FROST
          -6
          April 21 2012 21: 26
          EW division of the Iranian Army.
          They planted him - having taken control - Soviet !!!! electronic warfare station. The newest "development" of Ame.ri.co.co.s.ii !!! belay Gee-gee

          Amer calculated their losses on the computer - in the event of an invasion of Iran -
          they will be colossal - their losses


          Aren't you tired of clogging the branches with the same stupidity? Here it is obvious to everyone that you are still a young child. School would be better finished fool
    2. YARY
      +3
      April 21 2012 10: 59
      Valery with a compromise

      And so "delicious" all this skirmish looks. Iran simply will not allow joking with itself. There is also a desire to hide the "oilmen" over the edge. bully
      1. 755962
        +2
        April 21 2012 15: 48
        They do not allow Americans to relax at the same time show their curious intentions and capabilities.
  2. +13
    April 21 2012 09: 04
    It’s interesting, and when will we read about our drones conducting control flights of geographically dangerous zones in Chechnya, Ingushetia and Dagestan? After all, it really will save the lives of our soldiers!
    1. party3AH
      0
      April 22 2012 15: 19
      Not soon, one company released several samples, but for our ministers it’s a little expensive
  3. Pedro
    +2
    April 21 2012 09: 26
    Elephant and pug.
    1. itr
      0
      April 21 2012 09: 30
      Exactly what to rejoice at, well, taking pictures and what if it would sink it would be a number
      1. +5
        April 21 2012 09: 44
        It is understandable that Iranians will not learn anything new by taking a shot at an Ameri aircraft carrier. Nevertheless, it’s not unnecessary to once again demonstrate their capabilities. As long as Amers scratch their turnips, time passes, and it works for Iranians.
  4. SAMEDOV SULEYMAN
    +4
    April 21 2012 10: 09
    "One of these drones was trying to penetrate Iranian territory, and you saw what happened to him," Esmaili said, referring to the American drone stealth device, RQ-170 Sentinel, captured almost without damage by 4 of December 2011, the unit of EW of Iranian Army

    WHAT HAPPENED? IF NOT RUSSIA. WOULD NOT PUT IT OUT! GRAB P-CHILD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    1. itr
      -8
      April 21 2012 10: 37
      Samedov Suleman it seems to me that Russia has nothing to do with it, although it’s nice to listen to it
      1. +7
        April 21 2012 10: 54
        Of course, it’s not necessary, the removed blocks from the batch -117 in Iraq 1991, the laser-lived abrams in Iraq, mine in 2005. -Russia has nothing to do with what, that, and we are able to work
        1. itr
          +2
          April 21 2012 11: 57
          Alexander Romanov Of course, I'm sorry, but that the Jedi serve in the Russian army, because I don’t know more tanks than you can burn laughing
          But the F-117, in my opinion, was crushed in Yugoslavia, but again, not with lasers, just this plane in flight characteristics is not much inferior to corn
          1. +6
            April 21 2012 12: 12
            1991, was shot down by 117 stealth during the war with Iraq. Arriving rescue team found the plane with the removed blocks el.nachinki. 2005 for the whole world showed the lived abrams - calculate the info, and then minus
            1. itr
              +9
              April 21 2012 12: 28
              Alexander personally, I rarely put cons I think that all these shoulder straps are just stupid, although I always put the pluses on the shoulder straps for me is not the goal, I want to communicate on topics of interest to me
              Yes, and the tank has something to burn through and obviously not a laser read about ammunition please
      2. SAMEDOV SULEYMAN
        +8
        April 21 2012 11: 24
        Quote: itr
        it seems to me that Russia has nothing to do with it

        The electronic warfare of the Iranian Army without Russian technology is simply a beautiful abbreviation!
        1. itr
          +5
          April 21 2012 12: 00
          Samedov Suleiman all cool and patriotic soul warm your words
          But in order to land another's drone, you just need to have your own
          you look that ours are building just a shame I’ll buy my son like that in any store
    2. CCCP1980
      -4
      April 22 2012 14: 44
      KOGDA STATYA OB IRAN EU AZERBAYJANCEV winked NEVROZ
      ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????
      1. Scorpion2012
        -1
        April 22 2012 15: 21
        Quote: CCCP1980
        KOGDA STATYA OB IRAN EU AZERBAYJANCEV NEVROZ
        ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????

        Yes, you drive. We have long put on Iran and with a capital letter. If Iran is yours, could attack or make a coup in Azerbaijan, then believe it would have done a long time ago. I tried once, immediately put in place.
        Iran’s attack on Azerbaijan is an attack on the entire Turkic world. And then weakly will not answer to Turkey?
        The whole world is looking for a reason to attack Iran, and just a HAI boy, if you don’t know, this will be a great occasion, and everyone, without exception, will attack Iran if it at least gets a piece of land. Did not know ? And now you’ll know.
        If Azerbaijan were afraid of Iran, it would not have gained anything from Israel. Moreover, Azerbaijan’s relations with Iran are the result of their policy with Huyastan.
        So if they, as they say, honor Muslim solidarity, then I'm a ballerina.
        Little to them.

        ps Iran needs to sit like a mouse and not rock the boat. Quietly and silently. Suddenly they will forget or switch to another topic. And this right of Iran is well aware.

        They are like some dogs, they can bark, but they don’t bite.
        1. David
          -4
          April 22 2012 23: 08
          They don’t honor solidarity
          but cut skillfully ...
  5. Yarbay
    -1
    April 21 2012 10: 12
    Another show off Iranians !!!
    1. 0
      April 21 2012 10: 48
      Looks like they are seriously treating you, preparing for war.
      What is a show off you will know when Azerbaijan becomes a province of Iran.
      And neither Amer nor Saudi Turks will not help.
      1. Yarbay
        +7
        April 21 2012 10: 57
        Alex do not say stupid things!
        At least Russia will give Iranians a grudge against Iran and Iran will not go against us !!
        Yes, as always, they will try to destabilize the situation in Azerbaijan! Make minor sabotage!
        But they have no chance !!
      2. SAMEDOV SULEYMAN
        +6
        April 21 2012 11: 40
        Quote: ATATA
        ATATA

        Did you understand what you wrote?
        1. itr
          +5
          April 21 2012 12: 02
          I didn’t understand ATAT, but what did you want to say?
          1. Scorpion2012
            +1
            April 21 2012 21: 15
            Quote: itr
            I didn’t understand ATAT, but what did you want to say?


            If Iran were sure that it could capture Azerbaijan without consequences, then it would have done so long ago.

            An attack on Azerbaijan is the same as attacking Turkey.
            The President and Prime Minister of Turkey openly repeated this a thousand times.
            UNITED NATIONS, 2 STATE. The problems are common, the enemies are common.
      3. Scorpion2012
        0
        April 21 2012 21: 12
        an attack on Azerbaijan is the same as an attack on Turkey.
        Before stating such questions, please think.
        Question on the topic. Didn’t one American think about destroying a drone? Che article is not true.

        As the Iranian air force tried to cross the Azerbaijani airspace, the Turkish F16 quickly forced their phantons to fly back.

        So do not write bullshit.

        If Iran could, it would have attacked Azerbaijan long ago. Only an attack on Azerbaijan is tantamount to attacking Turkey.
        So your post is not serious.
  6. FED
    FED
    +2
    April 21 2012 10: 50
    Most importantly, some media claim that Russian equipment was used to capture this drone, radio capture
    1. Yarbay
      +3
      April 21 2012 11: 00
      Certainly certainly used !!
      But if you noticed a month before these events, there was a panic in the Pentagon and reports that the Chinese managed to get codes and many secret materials through computers.
      .even one American soldier was held accountable whether he played games or I don’t remember !!
      and immediately after landing the drone, conversations began that the Chinese were given a look at it !!
  7. modron
    +2
    April 21 2012 10: 54
    Iran is not a small state, but does it have a chance against the United States and Israel?
    1. +10
      April 21 2012 11: 00
      If there is no betrayal, I think they will survive, not without loss of course. The forces are not equal, but we hope that there will be no war
      1. Yarbay
        +5
        April 21 2012 11: 17
        Alexander will not stand too different weight categories and there are no real allies nearby !!
        1. 0
          April 21 2012 21: 44
          Yeah, even Afghanistan was too tough for these heavyweights, and Iran even more so. Amers do not fight with those who can fight back. They, like jackals, fight only in packs with the powerless. By blather, by blather and go home.
        2. party3AH
          -1
          April 22 2012 15: 31
          I do not agree, the Iranian "possible war" can stir up the Islamic world, the same martyrs will start their war inside the US, Afghanistan, Pakistan will scatter the NATO contingent in the east. This is my personal opinion, perhaps I am wrong.
    2. Yarbay
      +7
      April 21 2012 11: 05
      the chances are that the people will be united if the war starts!
      The Americans are a little unsure, because Iraq had an overwhelming air superiority in the Iran-Iraq war, but the Iranians did not lose !! Of course, Iraq and America are not comparable, but it makes you think !!
      I think Americans are just preparing carefully !!
      By and large, Iran has no chance !!
      But again, depending on what goals the United States sets itself, if they can’t occupy Iran!
    3. VIKING
      -7
      April 21 2012 17: 15
      Quote: Sergh
      Iranians can rightly be admired

      You can admire the pug too - yapping at the elephant, the mongrel is small. laughing
      Quote: Neighbor
      They planted him - taking over control - Soviet !!!! electronic warfare station. The newest "development" of Ame.ri.co.co.s.ii !!! belay Gee-gee.

      Bed the gray mare! Neither Soviet, let alone Iranian electronic warfare, has nothing to do with this drone accident. wassat Do you even dream! winked

      Quote: Neighbor
      Here you are a little wrong. Once a drone - quietly flies up to aircraft carriers and photographs them

      And you are not smart people, races smash such nonsense fool Carriers what do you think are in the territorial waters of Iran? wassat or in international waters you can shoot down, drown, crumble, water the potential enemy without being at war with him? am
      Quote: Neighbor
      our Onyx missiles - just as calmly fly up to them and sink ..... them. drinks
      + coastal anti-ship systems.
      Here you can say so - there is a confrontation not between Iran and the Amers - but our Russian and Soviet weapons and the Amer - "newest".

      You can engage in self-comfort as much as you like - Iran will not feel better from this if it suddenly rakes a specific 3,14 ... lei. am
      Quote: Neighbor
      Who will be more effective and stronger. The conclusion - I think - is obvious.
      Amer calculated their losses on the computer - in the event of an invasion of Iran -

      The conclusion is obvious - no one will invade Iran, but the Persians will be thrown back from the air and sea by missile-bombing point strikes in the Middle Ages.
      Quote: Neighbor
      This is not Libya or Iraq. Everything is serious there! There are no oranges - there is nobody to ruin their country with their paws.

      In Iraq, on the eve of the invasion, 98 or 99% of its citizens voted for Hussein, and what was the glee of the Iraqi people when they overthrew it! drinks
      In Iran, I am sure that all these ayatols are already sitting in the liver half of the population. am
      Quote: Ardent
      There is also a desire to hide the "oilmen" over the edge. bully

      They may have a desire, but the possibilities are close to zero.
      Quote: 755962
      Do not let the Americans relax at the same time show their curious intentions

      Yeah, so the Iranians themselves maliciously provoke a war? So who is sick? Who should be treated?
      Quote: SAMEDOV SULEYMAN
      IF NOT RUSSIA. WOULD NOT PUT IT OUT! GRAB P-CHILD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      ENOUGH X-Nude PIT !!!! THIS IS NOT MORE THAN IRANIAN TIPS ABOUT THE LANDED BLA !!!!!!
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Of course, it’s not necessary, the removed blocks from the batch -117 in Iraq 1991, the laser-lived abrams in Iraq, mine in 2005. -Russia has nothing to do with what, that, and we are able to work

      Well, here! Brad on! fool fool fool And about the downed F-117 in Iraq in the 91st year, laughing and especially about lasers that burn through the Abrams armor. laughing My friend, smoking all sorts of rubbish is not good !!! wassat
      Quote: modron
      Iran is not a small state, but does it have a chance against the United States and Israel?

      Of course not! Moreover, ALL (!) Iran’s neighbors are opposed to it, and some even have territorial claims, then Azerbaijan, for example. angry
      Quote: yacht
      And I also think that cheers in their harm are equal to the so-called fifth column.

      Are you an anti-Semite? And what does the "fifth column" have to do with it? And here's what, leavened capshooting hurray-patriotism fellow this guaranteed defeat is true. crying
      1. Scorpion2012
        +3
        April 21 2012 21: 23
        Quote: VIKING
        But you are not an intelligent person, have the aircraft carriers smacked such nonsense that, in your opinion, they are in the territorial waters of Iran? or in international waters you can shoot down, drown, crumble, water the potential enemy without being at war with him?

        +1 I was also surprised. The Americans are sitting and saying we are posing in you. Take a picture))))
        at one time, the USSR hardly got any pictures, but here Iranian drones take pictures on you for the whole American aircraft carrier))))))))))))

        Quote: VIKING
        The conclusion is obvious - no one will invade Iran, but the Persians will be thrown back from the air and sea by missile-bombing point strikes in the Middle Ages.

        +1 right.

        Quote: VIKING
        In Iran, I am sure that all these ayatols are already sitting in the liver half of the population.

        Considering how they lived in the time of the SHAH, then yes, I won’t be surprised if, like Gaddafi, all these ayatollahs hang in the market.
      2. 0
        April 22 2012 14: 24
        Quote: VIKING
        Bed the gray mare! Neither Soviet, let alone Iranian electronic warfare, has nothing to do with this drone accident. Do you ever dream!

        In my opinion your people are simply ignoring your nonsense, where did you see the accident of the drone? Or did the Iranians collect an exact copy of the drone from the wreckage in a week?

        Quote: VIKING
        But you are not an intelligent person, have the aircraft carriers smacked such nonsense that, in your opinion, they are in the territorial waters of Iran? or in international waters you can shoot down, drown, crumble, water the potential enemy without being at war with him?


        Nonsense is what you say, the territory around the aircraft carrier is considered the territory of the United States, and everything that flies up to any warship must be destroyed or forced to land.

        Quote: VIKING
        In Iraq, on the eve of the invasion, 98 or 99% of its citizens voted for Hussein, and what was the glee of the Iraqi people when they overthrew it! In Iran, I am sure that all these ayatols are already sitting in the liver half of the population.


        It’s immediately obvious that a person is already zombified by Western media who take all the information from sources located only in London or Paris ..
    4. Scorpion2012
      -3
      April 21 2012 21: 17
      Quote: modron
      Iran is not a small state, but does it have a chance against the United States and Israel?


      If there is a war, then not only the USA and Israel will attack Iran. And all. From Australia to Canada.

      And then nothing will help them there.

      What can save them? Only if Russia or China occupy Iran.
      1. Bashkaus
        0
        April 22 2012 14: 27
        You never know? The Russian Federation and China have repeatedly conducted joint military exercises, and there is already a precedent in Yugoslavia, when our paratroopers "with flowers" met NATO planes at the airport.
        1. Scorpion2012
          +1
          April 22 2012 15: 23
          Quote: Bashkaus
          Russia and China conducted joint military exercises many times

          This is not enough to save Iran.

          It is if Russia and China have military bases in Iran that will somehow stop the process. And so they will soon dream of a very big one.

          Although the commoner is sorry.
    5. CCCP1980
      -5
      April 22 2012 14: 41
      EST I DAVOLNO VISOKI ETI SHANSI. A TO UJE BI BAMBILI IZRALITIANE
      1. Scorpion2012
        -1
        April 22 2012 15: 25
        Quote: CCCP1980
        EST I DAVOLNO VISOKI ETI SHANSI. A TO UJE BI BAMBILI IZRALITIANE

        Listen Hai.
        To start a war, you need a reason. There is a reason. Nuclear program. Or this reason should be brought to mind, or look for a new reason.

        And the United States and NATO are experts on linden occasions.
  8. Num lock U.A.
    0
    April 21 2012 11: 11
    than to sit and wait idly by, why not take a picture of AUGs? So as not to relax bully
  9. +3
    April 21 2012 11: 30
    Quote: Num Lock UA
    than sitting back and waiting, why not take a picture of AUG

    And preferably cameras "Bastion" and "Cube"
    1. Num lock U.A.
      +1
      April 21 2012 11: 44
      Quote: Tersky
      And preferably cameras "Bastion" and "Cube"


      jokes joke that's good laughing only it is unlikely that Iran needs it, they would tease, but so as not to provoke, they want to take pictures of the panoramas of the Persian Gulf and "ships" bully
  10. Zlu
    Zlu
    +1
    April 21 2012 11: 42
    Not a big warning from the amers of Iran. That's right, there is one drone, still.
  11. +1
    April 21 2012 11: 46
    Let the adversary know that he is also being watched .....
  12. yacht
    +1
    April 21 2012 12: 20
    Taking pictures and sinking are two completely different things.
    Today we know that the Iranians have drones capable of photographing aircraft carriers, but we do not know in what quality and from what distance these pictures were taken. Also, we do not know whether the Americans managed to detect these drones and whether a command was given to destroy them. See how many unknowns are in this equation!

    As for the drone that Iran was able to intercept, you know, let's not attribute the merits of others to ourselves, and compose some myths about Russian super weapons, the reality is always much more commonplace.

    And I also think that hurray patriots are equal in their harm to the so-called fifth column.
    1. +1
      April 22 2012 19: 46
      Quote: yacht
      As for the drone that Iran was able to intercept, you know, let's not attribute the merits of others to ourselves, and compose some myths about Russian super weapons, the reality is always much more commonplace.

      Especially for people like you, Yakhontov, Iran posted a video on You Tube where you can see how the drone itself sat on the airfield! Http: //www.youtube.com/watch? V = v5nBEMyxwmI & feature = related
      1. Inzhengr
        0
        April 23 2012 16: 25
        You didn’t think you made him land on someone else’s airfield by changing commands, changing GPS signals? I would be glad if our army had such equipment and experience in intercepting NATO drones.
        1. -2
          April 23 2012 18: 31
          Quote: Engineering
          You didn’t think you made him land on someone else’s airfield by changing commands, changing GPS signals?

          But didn’t you think that the UAV control signal is not on an open line, and just replacing the signal from the satellite will not be enough?
          1. Inzhengr
            0
            April 24 2012 14: 55
            Naturally!
            Craftsmen are replacing numbers in GSM networks where there are no less super-duper-protected protocols, but didn’t you think about military specialists?
  13. LEM
    LEM
    +4
    April 21 2012 17: 59
    The Iranians are doing the wrong thing. First, with these crumbs, "dysentery ....." spray, and only then, when naked asses are hung overboard - then arrange photo sessions.
    1. Bashkaus
      0
      April 22 2012 14: 30
      I also wanted to write a comment in the style of "If they managed to fly up and take a picture, then they will be able to spread the plague spores," for example.
      1. Scorpion2012
        0
        April 22 2012 15: 26
        Absolutely right. The article is some kind of crude.
        Yes, the Iranians fled. So the aircraft carrier flew and so took a picture, and the auxiliary ships, which have a super air defense system and even flying American helicopters, still posed for the Iranian drone?

        yes nonsense damn
  14. +2
    April 21 2012 20: 01
    Normal work in progress. The atmosphere is heating up, intelligence is needed from the drones of Iran. As soon as the amers roll their glider onto the strip, so this will be a signal from the drone to what? ... GUESS YOURSELF
  15. +3
    April 21 2012 21: 02
    There is an information war. And Iran looks normal in it. Significantly better than Russia, which, thanks to the top of the country, has not just licked the Americans’ ass. So we look what will happen next. Sincerely.
    1. -1
      April 21 2012 21: 17
      Quote: suharev-52
      There is an information war. And Iran looks normal in it. Significantly better than Russia, which, thanks to the top of the country, has not just licked the Americans’ ass. So we look what will happen next. Sincerely.

      Get back to reality. For what time I am writing to you.
      PS We are waiting for you ... Yes
  16. Marat
    +4
    April 21 2012 22: 05
    The Iranians "hold the defense" for us all, close Russia and us and all the CSTO from the aggressors, and they also support Syria. At the same time, they mainly receive only moral and diplomatic support (from Russia with China and ALBA)
    I respect this country, its people and leadership with great respect and consider all comments offensive against Iran about Iran to Iran
    1. Scorpion2012
      0
      April 21 2012 23: 24
      Quote: Marat
      for us for all, they shut down from aggressors both Russia and us and all the CSTO

      FOR ALL RESPECT, I do not perceive the CSTO as an organization.
      This is the most shameful that Russia could create. Since I can bring 1000 examples where, according to the law, the CSTO should join, but not join.
      1. 0
        April 22 2012 04: 22
        No fuck! RUSSIA was supposed to join NATO: D booga ha. I’m better to go to the farm
        1. Scorpion2012
          0
          April 22 2012 05: 28
          Quote: IrkIt
          No fuck! RUSSIA was supposed to join NATO: D booga ha. I’m better to go to the farm


          hear nerd, did I write Russia in NATO? Rapana kick wide
          1. 0
            April 22 2012 09: 46
            This is my opinion and conclusion from your phrase. Express your thoughts more specifically and there will be no misunderstanding.
            1. Scorpion2012
              +2
              April 22 2012 12: 53
              Quote: IrkIt
              This is my opinion and conclusion from your phrase. Express your thoughts more specifically and there will be no misunderstanding.


              Your opinion about my opinion is wrong. NATO has been involved in many military conflicts. Comparing NATO and the CSTO is simply ridiculous.

              Although I am not a supporter of NATO, as I also saw their barbarism and double standards. And so the organization of the CSTO, these are just words.

              I can bring 100 examples where, according to the rules, the CSTO should enter the war, but it will not enter.
      2. Marat
        +2
        April 22 2012 20: 59
        I agree that the ODKB has problems - in fact, only 3 republics really "hold on to each other" are Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus (actually the backbone of integration, the CU and the CES)

        It is clear that Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan or Uzbekistan are not 100%
        reliable allies for political reasons or simply because of poverty - and in the event of a real military conflict, we will not receive special assistance from the Central Asians

        But on the other hand, what do you suggest? To disperse the CST and remain the three of us - our 3 republics and the whole world are against us? I agree that the CST is not NATO or the USSR - but you do not have to choose.

        I would not want Kazakhstan to border on openly hostile states in the south and have only 2 allies in the north - Russia and Belarus (although in fact by now it really is - who really helps if it gets hard, then only Russia and Belarus )

        All the same, the CSTO plays its role as a conduit of influence on Armenia (and the Caucasus) and Central Asia - and let the Uzbeks and the Kyrgyz and Tajiks be there - at least they are allies - not opponents
  17. +1
    April 22 2012 04: 19
    Cowboys have been following the satellite for a long time. Also, these toys on the remote control are outdated a long time ago. By the way, we, too, are merging information from Iran with our SS (satellite systems). BP (without pilots) only for rocket attacks and are suitable. BUT THE TRUTH IS FOR US. LANGUAGE OF THE UNIVERSE RUSSIAN !!!!
  18. Intel Inside
    -2
    April 22 2012 10: 25
    Many here claim that Iran is a victim. If this "victim" was about to wipe your country off the ground, I would watch you sing. Iran is a distributor country in the Middle East. Iran has been at war with Israel for many years. with the help of their "oppressed" comrades from Hamas.
    1. Scorpion2012
      +1
      April 22 2012 12: 56
      Quote: Intel Inside
      Many here claim that Iran is a victim.


      Watching from which belfry to watch. Iran is a victim because it has oil and gas in the first place.

      Quote: Intel Inside
      If this "victim" was about to wipe your country off the ground, I would watch you sing.

      Real Jews, asking their own government for self-destruction. By their faith, they cannot have a country.

      Quote: Intel Inside
      Iran has been fighting Israel for many years

      There has never been an open war and official hostilities. Maybe it helps the Palestinians, yes.
    2. Bashkaus
      0
      April 22 2012 14: 33
      Iran is undoubtedly a victim, there is no need to protect the poor parhat, they say, they threaten to be wiped off the face of the earth? They themselves, too, do not disdain some methods, and in truth, if you look, they came and out of the blue said "The Israeli state to BE! On this land, and the fact that others live on it does not bother us, let them go out"
      1. Scorpion2012
        -3
        April 22 2012 15: 27
        Quote: Bashkaus
        Iran is undoubtedly a victim, there is no need to protect the poor parhat, they say, they threaten to be wiped off the face of the earth? They themselves, too, do not disdain some methods, and in truth, if you look, they came and out of the blue said "The Israeli state to BE! On this land, and the fact that others live on it does not bother us, let them go out"


        Iran is the mistake of the Islamic world.
        1. LEM
          LEM
          +1
          April 22 2012 21: 09
          "Iran is the mistake of the Islamic world."
          Himself is not funny?
          Iran, the oldest civilization that existed several millennia before Islam. And neither Amers nor you judge the advisability of its existence.
          1. Scorpion2012
            -2
            April 24 2012 01: 41
            Quote: LEM
            Iran, the oldest civilization that existed several millennia before Islam. And neither Amers nor you judge the advisability of its existence.


            Whatever it is, politics is zero.
            Their direction in Islam is wrong.
            The concept of Islamic solidarity among them is also zero.

            Open Google and write the Mann state and then look at the years of its existence and then you will understand who is older.
  19. Scorpion2012
    0
    April 22 2012 22: 16
    Quote: LEM
    Iran, the oldest civilization that existed several millennia before Islam


    And what about civilization? we all have a millennial existence. They didn’t fall from the moon, or we?

    I'm talking about the relationship of the Sunnis to Iran and generally to the Shiites.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"