The Pentagon is concerned about the build-up of non-strategic nuclear weapons in Russia

26
The US Department of Defense is concerned about the buildup of stocks of non-strategic nuclear weapons in Russia, reports RIA News Statement by Deputy Assistant Head of the Pentagon on Nuclear Policy Robert Sufer.





According to him, the Russian Federation currently has about 2-x thousand units of non-strategic nuclear weapons. But this is not an exact figure, in fact it may be more.

We looked at the Russian strategy, the Russian doctrine, the teachings ... and we need to do something to respond to this, we had no choice
said Sufer.

In the long run, we are concerned that their stocks of tactical nuclear weapons will increase, become even larger,
He stressed.

Earlier, the Pentagon published a nuclear doctrine, according to which in the coming years, US efforts will be directed to the development of low-power nuclear warheads. The US Department of Defense also stated that they did not intend to lower the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons, and the main goal remains to "contain both nuclear and non-nuclear strategic attacks."

Of particular concern to Moscow were the US intentions to create a nuclear “low-power” ammunition for sea-based cruise missiles and a “lightweight warhead” for the ballistic missiles of the Trident II submarines.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    22 February 2018 12: 27
    And how worried we are.Moscow was particularly concerned about US intentions to create a "low power" nuclear weapon It will be interesting to know. There are few fools on both sides of the ocean. There is already an answer from our side.
    1. +6
      22 February 2018 12: 30
      "If in the first act a gun hangs on the wall, then it will certainly shoot!"
      After all, they will be forced to be "grumpy" first ...
      Hello my friend! hi
      1. +3
        22 February 2018 12: 35
        Great, Friend! But, I don’t want to shoot. But, if all the same, then the proud furry animal will come to the impudent side of the conflict!
        1. +6
          22 February 2018 12: 43
          Beat on the "impudent, red (striped) face"! Yes, only everyone will get it. Even those who are out of business ...
        2. +4
          22 February 2018 13: 18
          But, if all the same, then the proud furry animal will come to the sassy side of the conflict!
          ..... we will answer our "fluffy Arctic fox" to their stinky skunk ....
          Fluffy boys from Baikal!hi laughing
          1. 0
            22 February 2018 16: 36
            Great, Solomon! And you will not be bored! With the coming. drinks
            1. +1
              22 February 2018 17: 43
              Mutually!!!!! drinks good soldier
      2. +2
        22 February 2018 12: 35
        Everything for you, everything for you our striped "friends"! You most importantly get ready with your lackeys, otherwise you will not stock up on arms! Yes
  2. 0
    22 February 2018 12: 28
    So we have NATO on our side ... the Middle East ... and there are still "Friends" ... and what the US is worried about ... they won’t get it ...
  3. +1
    22 February 2018 12: 29
    Concerned States of America
  4. +2
    22 February 2018 12: 29
    We looked at the Russian strategy, the Russian doctrine, the teachings ... and we need to do something to respond to this, we had no choice
    Only I have deja vu? Below is the article "The Pentagon called the condition for the abandonment of cruise missiles with nuclear warheads." With the same quotes.
    1. 0
      22 February 2018 12: 32
      Only I have deja vu? However, it was met somewhere. And more than once. Panic does not allow the brain to work intelligently. We’ll hear more.
  5. +2
    22 February 2018 12: 30
    Poor things, The whole world threatens them and does not allow them to carry a palm branch and launch pigeons of the world. And all because Russia has a huge military budget, and light soldiers from the USA eat up the last horseradish without salt.
  6. +1
    22 February 2018 12: 32
    The Pentagon will still have many “concerns”, it’s necessary to somehow use up such a pre-military budget ...
  7. +2
    22 February 2018 12: 32
    How to comment? Threshed from empty to empty.
    Enemies around and give money! Something new?
    1. +2
      22 February 2018 12: 36
      A bit wrong ... Give money ... enemies around ...
      1. +1
        22 February 2018 12: 48
        We then neigh again, okay.
        They will not finally drive their inhabitants on the ground, no?
        They said in our army - if a sailor is forced to croak, will he eventually jump? A joke, but there is a hint in it!
  8. +1
    22 February 2018 12: 37
    Well, then their problems ...
  9. +1
    22 February 2018 12: 38
    With plans for a quick global strike (BSU) on Russia, the mattresses turned out to be zilch, now it remains to lean on nuclear weapons, which they have not really received yet. They overslept the actions of the Russian Federation to rearm the nuclear arsenal. Therefore, diarrhea is now emanating.
  10. +6
    22 February 2018 12: 38
    But this is not an exact figure, in reality it can be more.
    And it may not be .. I’m also worried about a possible reduction in the number of penguins in the Galapagos, though they may not be reduced there .. recourse laughing They just get on their nerves ... Do not cut below what is allowed under the agreements and increase the forbidden - this is our way of developing a kuzkina mother and a guarantee of security ... No need to be screamed at "theirs" ..
  11. +3
    22 February 2018 13: 35
    It looks like this: the United States is swinging to hit us, and Russia is preparing to block and strike in response. Seeing this, the United States expresses indignation at the "unprovoked aggression" of Russia. The United States, which is located beyond the puddle from us, is drawing all kinds of offensive nuclear and non-nuclear guano to our borders, but we are developing stockpiles of tactical nuclear weapons in order to carry out, in case of something, "disinfection" of any kind of Amer that threatens our clear and peaceful sky. Well, it’s not strategic nuclear weapons to beat near its borders, for them there is another urgent goal.
    And what is confusing in this ironic logic of the "exceptional"?
  12. 0
    22 February 2018 14: 17
    Military expert Alex Leonkov stated that the United States "wants to put into orbit such devices that will drop solid-state alloy rods called the" Rod of God "onto the Earth.
    If you drop these rods in bulk on a settlement, then,
    they will fly at a speed of up to seven kilometers per second, a kinetic blow will result.
    In this case, unlike a nuclear explosion, there will be no ionizing infections, but there will be large-scale destruction.
    It’s practically impossible to bring down such a thing, because no air defense system in the world has ever hit a meteorite. ”
    1. +1
      22 February 2018 14: 52
      Quote: alta
      they will fly at a speed of up to seven kilometers per second, a kinetic blow will result.

      "A body in free fall in dense layers of the atmosphere develops a speed not exceeding 180 km / h." (c) the same physics. You can calculate the potential energy of the "rod" yourself.
      Quote: alta
      solid alloy rods

      I leave alloys on your conscience.
  13. 0
    22 February 2018 14: 28
    Let them not worry - they will like it
  14. 0
    22 February 2018 18: 17
    we had no choice
    Maybe .. Out the window .., shouting "Russians go !!!"? You have enough skyscrapers.
  15. 0
    24 February 2018 10: 26
    my household is also concerned about the amount of PURCHASED Alcohol !!! but I told them both that this is only on March 8 !!! drinks tongue AGREED !!! drinks tongue