The situation is reminiscent of a well-known university principle, when a knowledgeable elder comrade explains to a first-year student that first you work on a grade book, then a grade record works for you. Some candidates apparently decided that it was absolutely useless for the electorate to present any points of some kind of program, but it would be better to simply “lighten” with its media coverage and, as it is now fashionable to say, the background, so that voters come to the polls and tick "Where necessary".
In some cases, programs (and often party programs, rather than a specific action plan of a person who claims to be the presidency) are posted on candidate sites, but the attendance of these sites is such that it can be a fact: no more than 0,1% of the total number of candidates read the list of candidate initiatives. voters. That is, the bet is still on the “media” and on what is already in the “record book” ... And what it has in the individual candidates is a separate question ...
What do voters propose the first of the registered candidates, Vladimir Zhirinovsky? If you read the recent election slogans of Vladimir Volfovich, then you would think that the candidate was hanging somewhere between 1996 and 2008 for years. Basically - everything is the same. The slogans are beautiful, bright, juicy, but, how could I express it more precisely, not quite about what would really be worthy of discussion.
In schools, it is necessary to stop putting "two" students and not exclude them for academic failure, so as not to injure the psyche?
This is as a commentary on the shootings in schools in the USA and Russia.
Apparently, Vladimir Volfovich distanced himself from the realities of modern education, in which the liberal principle operates: “Teacher, if you bet two, you bet it to yourself”. The liberal principle is that everything is with us, you know, Newtons and Lobachevskys, Vasnetsovs and Sholokhovs, and why teachers bury their remarkable talents in the ground by their desire to slap "unsuccessful" for the lesson ... In general, the fact that some scumbags, having sniffed up Pi-Pi-Pi (“zapikano” for Roskomnadzor is behind the media), grab traumates, hatchets and axes and go to kill their peers, blame, judging by the presented logic of the candidate, again the teachers ...
Debates between candidates translate from live broadcast to broadcast to recording.
No comment ... And still twist three times a day?
Need to unload historical the center of the capital!
And who bothers something? A person sets a record in the number of registrations as a candidate, being in parliament for more than a quarter of a century, and it will not unload him in any way. Maybe first try to remove the extra flashers and special signals for "especially those in a hurry"? ..
Well, about the program. Here is its quintessence:
I will restore order and ensure that every family has income sufficient for living, not survival. My main goal is the welfare of all citizens, economic growth and population growth. A guarantee of this - work, own apartment, free health care.
A couple of excerpts:
Restore the greatness of Russia. Return under the Russian flags all lost territory. Peacefully, without wars - through referendums!
A referendum in Alaska will also be? ..
Write off pensioners and socially needy citizens with rent arrears for electricity and gas.
And work in the Duma does not allow this either? Who prevented all this from seeking the post of one of the most important bodies of state power - the legislative? Or in the country only the president is responsible for the income of citizens, free health care and the provision of retirees?
What is another candidate with the same name? Also an interesting situation. Also, the record book works. Even on the air of the federal media about the program of the candidate Vladimir Putin to speak somehow not accepted. On the air - traditionally: either the candidate himself as president, or trustees who take complaints from ordinary Russians and promise that after reviewing the appeals, they will repair the roof of the house, will rake the dump outside the city and plant chestnuts on the central avenue. Maybe it is not customary to talk about the program, based on the fact that not everything worked out with the previous program, especially in the economic sphere - for example, with millions (like 25) of new high-tech jobs. Or maybe this is secret information so that the fifth column does not guess ...
Works candidate's site for the presidency of Vladimir Putin, but even on the website the program of action in the event of election is not at all detected. About how confidants celebrated Shrovetide, there is; that the Japanese journalists met with the volunteers of the candidate’s headquarters is also there; there is also the fact that the CEC of the Russian Federation has no complaints about the collected signatures. And there is no program. This is less than a month before the vote.
The candidate of the top three presidential rankings is Pavel Grudinin. Anyone who is interested in the course of the election campaign, now first of all should remember two main dogmas: Grudinin did not provide a certificate of closing Swiss accounts and Grudinin was deceiving with packs of residents of the Lenin state farm. Apparently, the candidate’s campaign is built on these “dogmas”, as if something did not work out ... And the fact that, in this case, the CEC registered Grudinina in the presence of “unclosed accounts” and either real or fake lawsuits of deceived state farmers is not entirely clear.
And what about the program?
On the Online she is. That just looks like a tracing paper from all that in recent years represents the Communist Party. Although why tracing paper? These are the very 20 steps that the Communist Party has been going on for years, but it turns out that with intensive walking it remains in place - a warm place in the State Duma. It looks like Vladimir Volfovich, beautiful, juicy, capacious, but also with a touch of populism be healthy.
For example, the item 2. Restoration of Russia's economic sovereignty. Those trillions of rubles that are stored in banks and US debt, we will make investments in production, science and education.
But who is against? In science - please, in education - too.
but there is one question: does the United States know about it? .. And if they find out, then another question: after how many milliseconds will the Russian funds be frozen?
New industrialization, modernization of the economy and its conclusion on the innovation rails.
And it sounds great. But what about the oligarchs, who stubbornly don’t want to withdraw funds from offshore companies, or to get up on innovative rails if there are opportunities to circumvent legislation by negotiating with those who “need to”.
Taxes are in the interests of justice and development.
In general, for all the good against all the bad. Like all the other candidates.
Sobchak isolated: Against all, and returns the Crimea to Ukraine.
Yavlinsky: Not against everyone, but will make life brighter and more beautiful, “reviving the economy.” I wonder if it is not according to the program of “500 days”, which is quickly replaced by “Gaidar jerk”?
Titov will return all the businessmen who have been caught stealing, although they do not promise to return the money ...
Baburin ... And what about Baburin? Everything is also great, beautiful and wonderful - only within the statistical error.
Sorry for terry "babayagizm" in relation to candidates, but to go with programs, slogans or without programs at all instead of providing voters with a real plan of action if elected president - clearly will not add the percentage of those who get up "from the oven" and go to the polls. Or are the candidates from the list not interested?