Indian "PEACEKEEPERS" - Agni-I, II, III.IV, V

9
Indian "PEACEKEEPERS" - Agni-I, II, III.IV, V

The successful tests of Agni-V, conducted by India 19.04.2012, allowed it to “break into” an elite club of countries that own ICBM technology (ICBM).


The local Indian press does not call the Agni-V ICBM other than "the killer of China."
"I brought you a fire (Agni), I could not otherwise!"
During the test launch, the 17,5-meter Fire-V reached an altitude of 600 km and a speed of 7000 m / s, which allowed the rocket to reach its intended range.

According to the website of the Federation of American Scientists (Britannica.com), the range of ICBMs is 5500 km and more.

Avinash Chander Project Director (DRDO): India has missiles in its arsenal that can hit targets at a distance of 5000 km.

[/ b] Features of the BR (all solid fuel): [/ b]
Agni-I - PU: railway mobile (standard wide railway track), unpaved mobile PU (developed by VRDE DRDO from 2002, range 700 km), apogee 300-380 km (UE = 67 °), 185 km (UE = 45 º).
The mass of the payload can reach 1000 kg.
Agni-I body material - high-strength steel 15CDV6

Agni-II range up to 3000 km, using a specific payload.
1 A stage with aerodynamic rudders (possibility of flying not along a ballistic trajectory) and cartridges with shunting solid propellant rocket motors.
2 Stage with Flex (sliding) nozzle nozzles, apogee 405 km, additional mini shunting LRE.
The body of the warhead is equipped with aerodynamic control surfaces for maneuvering when entering the atmosphere, consists of carbon-carbon composite materials, is lightweight and able to withstand high temperatures when returning to the atmosphere along various trajectories.
Agni-II body material - high-strength steel 15CDV6 (level 1 and 2). KP: Railway platform or mobile ground
Navigation: TDOA BIUS data bus: 1553 Data Bus (MIL-STD-1553)
A large amount of BO allows you to place the means to overcome the missile defense
With a warhead RV 750 kg according to some data, the range can reach 4000 km (Railway PU)

Agni-III, successor of Agni-II, heavier, longer range, high accuracy, smaller gabbarite in length, mobile
1 stage body carbon composite materials, 2 stage: martensitic-aging steel
CU - Agni RV-Mk.4, able to maneuver in dense layers of the atmosphere. Thermal protection withstands aerodynamic heating up to 6000 ° C at a speed of 5 km / s

Bangalore, 2011: Indian scientists have developed innovative technology that can increase the range of missiles and launch vehicles by at least 40%.
Agni III, capable of hitting targets 3500 km, and the new technology can increase the range to 4900 km.
These results were obtained using special chromium-based coatings for the cone of rockets and launch vehicles. The material acts as an ablative coating that forms a thin gas layer on the rocket fairing as it approaches hypersonic speed, this superheated low-density gas layer reduces resistance by 47% (with Mach number 7-8)
/ G Jagadeesh, Associate Professor at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) May2008.
Modifications: SLBM K-4 (project KH) with a range of 3500 km.

Agni -IV
Warheads -nuclear 15 KT to ~ 250 KT / 1 tn to 2,000Kg conventional, thermobaric.
Navigation, pointing: Ring Laser Gyro based Navigation System (RINS) Micro Navigation System (MINS) optional GPS / Glonas receiver with the ability to correlate the trajectory along the beam radar.
Studies are being conducted for Agni-IV control systems with the aim of hitting ballistic missiles (ABM)

Agni-V, on the Agni-III platform (60% subsystems), extensive use of the latest composites to reduce weight., to 600 new elements in the control system, the number of cables is significantly reduced, and the noise immunity is increased. MIRV-2, MIRV-3, MIRV-10 maneuver warhead units with maneuver, maneuvering, TTRD correction.
2-10 individual nuclear warheads.

The term of adoption is the end of 2014 of the year or the beginning of 2015.



The United States cautiously approved missile tests in India. According to The New York Times
China Central Television (CCTV) listed some missile flaws and reported: "This missile is not a real threat."
Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Weimin: "China and India are large developing countries. We are not competitors, but partners."


Agni-VI Modification of Agni-V SLBM, Project KH with Reelectric Warheads IN

for Arihant class submarines (80 Mega Watt YASU) one of the А6 modifications (6000km) to replace further SLBM type K-15 (700km) Shourya / Sagarika



The Pioner (India), 2011 expressed doubt that DRDO will be able to independently develop an ICBM (BR Submarine) with a range of more than 10000km.
Rahul Dattan New Delhi: Russia is ready to share know-how with India, Russia has provided its advanced GLONAS system for the military purposes of India.
DRDO laboratories in the city of Chandigarh, a ballistics department, a research laboratory (OOI) developed a detonator that will initiate the detonation of the nuclear warhead for Agni-V.
Information:
India has not signed the Missile Technology Control Regime contract.
Chinese Deng Fong-31A MBRBD (ICBM) has a range of 11 500 km and can easily hit all of Asia and achieve goals in Russia and most of Eastern Europe.
3D - Agni-V MBR Model
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

9 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sarus
    +3
    April 20 2012 08: 26
    Asia is actively arming itself ..
    India has another argument for confronting Pakistan and China ... A strong player in Asia
    1. 755962
      +1
      April 20 2012 11: 48
      Quote: Sarus
      Asia is actively arming itself ..

      It is likely that this will push the whole of Asia to an arms race. China will not leave this unambiguous. And what will happen when the Agni-VI project matures and the missile range is about 16000 km.?
  2. Flight Recorder
    +5
    April 20 2012 09: 10
    Given the population density of India, China and Pakistan, as well as the almost complete absence of ballistic missile interception means from these opponents, we can assume that in the event of an exchange of nuclear strikes, the delivery of warheads to the target will reach the absolute and as a result, half of the world's population will be destroyed.
    1. Sergh
      -1
      April 20 2012 09: 36
      What is in India, what in China must be monitored so that the General Staff do not get carried away with weed, and cognac, otherwise they would do something drunk!
  3. Tabtuha
    -1
    April 20 2012 10: 33
    I hope they do not have a Caribbean crisis
  4. Eugene
    +1
    April 20 2012 12: 43
    I personally don’t really like it.
    Previously, one could expect a nuclear present in Moscow only from across the ocean, but now these are still drawn.
    I am amazed how the United States and Russia have a normal attitude towards the fact that the Hindus did not sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty then, and now they have washed down the BRDS and then the ICBMs.
    And Russia is now in general a nuisance, there are 2 nuclear powers with the BRBD, and also NATO.
    1. DartAjax
      +1
      April 20 2012 14: 16
      Nearby are two nuclear powers .. hmm .. Well, Duc, you can turn in your direction too .. On such a territory (RF + India + China) zadolbaeshsya launch missiles, and intercept the "response".

      It's stupidity, of course, but there is such a little thing - DEFCON .. a simulator of a nuclear war .. Europe and North America are burning merrily and beautifully under the Russian-Indian-Chinese "pies", spraying their own into nowhere ... since it is easier to cover such a territory at home blow up in mines and wait for a nuclear winter :)
    2. Sirius
      0
      April 20 2012 18: 51
      Correctly. I also have a dual feeling. In recent years, India has increasingly turned its back on Russia. I read somewhere: the United States and India are contacted on the basis of hostility towards Pakistan. Who will give a cut-off head if, in five to ten years, the same India will snarl at Russia?
  5. Pravdoruba
    +1
    April 20 2012 15: 08
    Well done what to say. With such countries, "BRIC" should be friends as opposed to NATO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  6. vylvyn
    -1
    April 21 2012 02: 31
    Look, Iraq didn’t have nuclear weapons, and the Americans were rotting them. Iran does not have nuclear weapons - it is spread rot anyway. And then they create ICBMs - and silence. Here the hostility of India, China and Pakistan is beneficial to the amers, because in the event of a nuclear conflict Russia will also get, and the Americans will sit far beyond the ocean and chuckle. Uncomplicated Yankees policy. If Russia manages to establish at least tolerant relations between India and China within the BRIC framework, then Pakistan will squeeze its tail, and the Americans will stupidly obsessed with fear, realizing that now ICBMs can fly not towards Russia, but overseas to them. So in this regard, the work of Russia to create the BRIC is extremely important strategically.
  7. L. konstantin
    +1
    April 22 2012 15: 08
    In my opinion, they are stamping missiles not without the participation of Russia.
  8. L. konstantin
    0
    April 23 2012 01: 31
    apparently poplar flying! and why technology is scattered! and all the money! so who look brother 2! this is not a fact .. you can buy for any candy wrappers! and FSU I look at security in this world! and not the fact that the Indians support us! we see the territory that everyone dreams of! you are stupid people if you believe in some sort of union)

    China guidance system! BB India technology rocket suffering! well done damn it! soon every house will have an atomic bomb

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"