Military Review

The missile defense system in the Moscow region will be strengthened with the Nudol missiles

53
The missile defense system covering Moscow will be reinforced this year by ultra-fast and super-maneuverable 53Т6М “Nudol” missiles capable of intercepting targets in near space and the stratosphere, according to News.




According to representatives of the Ministry of Defense, 53Т6М will be put on test combat duty in the Moscow region until the end of this year. Earlier, the military reported successful missile tests at the Sary-Shagan test site in Kazakhstan.

“Nudoli” is an upgraded version of the 80Т53 interceptor missiles created back in 6. The new interceptor is a two-stage solid-fuel rocket, which is stored in an airtight transport and launch container. In a combat position, it is located in a special mine. The developers were able to update the electronic filling and revive the production. For this, it was necessary to find a replacement for the components produced in the former Soviet republics, ”the material says.

According to Dmitry Kornev, chief editor of the MilitaryRussia portal, the adoption of new interceptors is likely to be part of the modernization program for the entire missile defense system.

The Russian missile defense system A-135 "Amur" refers to the middle 80-s. Despite all the advantages, it is morally obsolete both in hardware and software. Therefore, work was carried out to create the next modification - A-235. Not only interceptors were updated, but also electronics, and software, and radars, and a computing center,
said the expert.

He noted that today there is a need for a new anti-missile, created with all current trends in development of this type weapons.

53T6 are in service with 90-ies, and their warranty period will expire soon. In addition, the accuracy of modern electronics and interceptor guidance allows the use of a conventional warhead instead of a nuclear one, which is important when used over a densely populated area. If you managed to create a homing warhead, then the rocket will be able to destroy the latest maneuvering nuclear warheads,
explained Kornev.

This is the "last line of defense", intended only to destroy the warheads of intercontinental ballistic missiles. Nudol will not be able to shoot down the missile itself at the initial stage of the flight. This system is also capable of destroying satellites, but in a very small sector over Moscow and in low orbits,
added on.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 21 February 2018 08: 17
    +4
    managed to create a homing warhead, then the rocket will be able to destroy the latest maneuvering nuclear warheads,
    how many maneuvering warheads can one rocket destroy ??? do not understand..
    1. hrych
      hrych 21 February 2018 08: 27
      +3
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      not understood..

      The expert is a journalist, not a rocket engineer. Therefore, it sweeps its tongue as it waves a broom ...
      According to Dmitry Kornev, editor-in-chief of the MilitaryRussia portal
      1. Uryukc
        Uryukc 22 February 2018 00: 15
        0
        Quote: hrych
        The expert is a journalist, not a rocket engineer. Therefore, it sweeps its tongue as it waves a broom ...

        MilitaryRussia is an Internet portal, not a magazine, and it is the best Internet portal about our equipment in RuNet. So it’s you who’s waving your broom. In order not to be unfounded I give a link, take a look at the article about the updated one 160 and evaluate the pedantry in the selection of material and links to sources ...
        http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-271.html
        1. hrych
          hrych 22 February 2018 05: 43
          +1
          Firstly, a citizen journalist suffered a blizzard and this portal, at least disgraced. When a nuclear missile charge is used, detonation occurs at an altitude where the discharged atmosphere and the shock wave do not reach the surface, no radioactive contamination is expected, and light emission from the atmosphere and clouds will also weaken. Those. all the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion of a missile defense will be safe for the defenders, unless the EMP burns all the iPhones and iPads. Plus the missile defense is not powerful at the near turn. No wise guy will escape from a nuclear strike to undermine his city. But Mr. Kornev does not understand that besides the enemy’s BB there are dozens of false targets, it’s impossible to select koi, and each BB and LC needs a missile for direct hit, but a nuclear charge can destroy all this stuff at once and no direct hit is required. Naturally, there can be no talk of any intercepts of maneuvering units at the far frontier. The author confuses 53T6 - a short-range interception missile and a 51T6 long-range intercept missile, which can also bring down satellites. And close interception is carried out at a height of 30-40 km, at least 5 km, where a 10 kT charge will already be harmful to the surface. And Nudol is not a missile, but a system, like Amur, in which the PRS-1 (53T6) 10 kT short-range intercept missile, the Azov or 51T6, or A-925 long-range intercept rocket and its charge reaches up to several megatons, but it affects the BB and low-orbit enemy satellites at high altitude and in a space vacuum, where there is no shock wave propagation. I don’t intend to read your link, the editor-in-chief has already been annoyed by his babbling and incompetence.
          1. Uryukc
            Uryukc 22 February 2018 21: 02
            0
            I do not want to offend you or compete with the strategicity of the sofa. It's just that you're wrong, but he is.
            Quote: hrych
            First, a citizen journalist suffered a blizzard

            Where is the blizzard ??
            In addition, the accuracy of modern electronics and the guidance of interceptors allows the use of a conventional warhead instead of a nuclear one, and this is important in case of application over densely populated area.

            Where is the possibility of using special warheads?
            Quote: hrych
            Speech about the safety of stratospheric nuclear explosions

            The radiation belt of the earth will become fat, which will make radio communication impossible; at least there will be other consequences.
            Quote: hrych
            Except that EMP will burn all iPhones and iPads.

            As well as radar missile defense / air defense. Including radars of Nudol.
            Quote: hrych
            that besides the enemy’s BB there are a dozen more false goals,

            1. False ones hang out in the near space and do not fly in a bunch,
            2. The US does not use false targets on its missiles,
            3. You need to shoot down only NOT false targets.
            Quote: hrych
            A-925 and its charge reaches up to several megatons

            Special combat units were abandoned; at present, only missiles with conventional combat units are on duty. References and evidence will not be, look for yourself. And then you will not even watch my links, write again about incompetence or the like.
            1. hrych
              hrych 23 February 2018 11: 58
              +1
              Quote: Uryukc
              1. False ones hang out in the near space and do not fly in a bunch,
              2. The US does not use false targets on its missiles,
              3. You need to shoot down only NOT false targets.

              False targets - inflatable, foil flying in an airless space do not differ either in the optical or in the radar spectrum and are not selected. They fly in formation with BB, with the same speed and dense formation, before entering the dense layers of the atmosphere, are intercepted only by long-range missile defense missiles. This is an American inflatable LC, ours is not very different.
              upon entering the atmosphere, inflatable LCs fly off and are already “operating” LCs of a different type: small, but heavy. The burning of the pyrotechnic composition in such a LC simulates the thermal "image" of the warhead. In order to confuse the GOS of infrared guidance of a missile defense, this “image” is also impossible to distinguish because it completely copies this BB, a near-range intercept missile is already working here more quickly, although it can also be a long-range one. This is a heavy false block.
              So how not to attack the LC if it is no different?
              About the interception of maneuvering, generally a fairy tale ..
            2. hrych
              hrych 23 February 2018 12: 05
              +1
              Quote: Uryukc
              Special combat units were abandoned; at present, only missiles with conventional combat units are on duty.

              You are mistaken, only a special warhead, for the reasons indicated. It is they with SM-3 who are trying to stir up a direct hit. Theirs GBI - 2 Minuteman stages also a nuclear missile defense. A long-range interception missile of several megatons is capable of hitting several enemy BBs, before entering the atmosphere and the moment of individual guidance, flying in tight formation and spitting on the LC, almost all BBs of one missile. But our new maneuvering scatter along the trajectory and one can’t hit them with one charge, for every warhead, we need a missile. These are the rules of missile defense.
              1. Uryukc
                Uryukc 23 February 2018 23: 00
                0
                Quote: hrych
                A multi-megaton long-range intercept missile is capable of hitting several enemy BBs, before entering the atmosphere and the moment of individual guidance

                As far as I know, the breeding stage of the Minutemen turns the BB in half the way in turn, and only Amers know how they fly. It is hardly worth counting on rain from the BB in one place. A stratospheric nuclear explosion is not at all the same as its atmospheric efficiency should be much lower due to the discharged atmosphere. As a result, it is difficult to hope for multiple defeats, although this is possible.
                But still, the main inconvenience of special equipment is electromagnetic radiation and radiation in the stratosphere. After the first intercepts, the missile defense system will go blind. And that's why the equipment should be normal. The claim to Kornev only that he did not mention this, but began to worry about the microdistricts.

                PS. I read about American false targets for the first time. Share the link, please.
                1. hrych
                  hrych 24 February 2018 07: 34
                  0
                  With a decent explosion, the plasma ball will reach up to a kilometer, i.e. will ensure the defeat of everything in this diameter, including BB and LC. And direct - kinetic hit is able to hit one object, and then the task of getting into it is very difficult and unnecessary. Radiation is carried away by high-altitude flows of 10 thousand meters to America. The infection itself, even with an air explosion, is minimal, tens of kg of fissile substances will fly away and that's it. With the ground, yes, the infected soil rises, so it infects the terrain. And the air, especially the stratospheric and space, are absolutely harmless. And EMR of course, but there will be no second attempt. Managed to repel, well done, then alive, and the enemy destroyed. Let them put SM-3 there, our S-500 will be an analogue, but ... even the S-300 has a special combat unit. For to bring down enemy aircraft also with an air explosion is not forbidden.
                  1. Uryukc
                    Uryukc 24 February 2018 22: 27
                    0
                    Quote: hrych
                    Radiation is carried away by high-altitude flows of 10 thousand meters, to America

                    Radioactive dust will not go anywhere, it will hang out (it can fly around the planet dozens of times) and then dissipate in the stratosphere in the atmosphere until it settles on the earth and water and even from one “speck of dust” there will be consequences, although not so terrifying. And these consequences are relatively evenly distributed on the ground.
                    For missile defense and the army in general, it’s worse if this dust dangles there, we won’t be able to track near space or use space communication, that is, even if the missile defense recovers from the EMP they still can’t work normally.
                    Quote: hrych
                    And the air, especially the stratospheric and space, are absolutely harmless.

                    The word - absolutely, is not appropriate here. "Relatively" is the correct adverb.
                    Quote: hrych
                    direct - kinetic hit is able to hit one object, and then the task of getting into it is very difficult and unnecessary.

                    A special warhead can only intercept a limited strike. Effective conventional warheads give hope for multiple interception. A limited blow is unlikely to be limited. Most likely, an apocalyptic salvo will stretch for half an hour or more. These warheads do not have to be kinetic; a heavy high-explosive warhead must handle it.
                    I also heard about plasma technology, the meaning is that plasma ultimately discharges a certain volume of the atmosphere in which the enemy’s BB is located, without destroying it, but the BB moving in a rarefied medium reaches the front of a dense atmosphere and is already destroyed about it. True, apart from this description, I can’t share anything with you.
                    Thank you for the video, but I roughly represent the stratospheric explosion, it would be better if you shared a link to the false targets of American production.
                    1. hrych
                      hrych 25 February 2018 07: 26
                      0
                      The fact of the matter is that there is no infected dust, the charge of fissile material during an air explosion scatters completely, and most of it simply reacted by nuclear fission, a small cloud of vapor also instantly dissipates. Any average volcano gives dirt like a thousand charges, and TPPs on coal infect children with dust constantly, and even a ton of ash goes a couple grams of uranium. An air explosion (not high-altitude) is the most effective in the area of ​​impact by the shock wave and in a nuclear strike they will be in the vast majority. It’s safe for the environment, and the “green” and the adherents of the “nuclear winter” at the State Department’s suction are trying to powder our brains and how the non-delivering “soldier mothers” will convince the soldiers to surrender to Chechen, after which they cut their throats unarmed ... since 1953, when they made the thermo-nuclear bomb - Puff, and not the Teller device with a 4-storey building, also complete superiority in carriers. And under the Russian Federation and Putin, they updated the entire line and reached a different qualitative level. There are a thousand American bases, aircraft carriers and powerful NATO allies, they simply do not mean anything, if we abandon nuclear weapons, we are almost doomed and a friend of the PRC will also hit in the back. Now, in one gulp of three Boreans, each will destroy the United States, the EU and the PRC, and our tactical nuclear weapons cannot be calculated. So, the missile defense system of the current scheme is just capable of repelling the strike of American missiles on the central region of the Russian Federation, because long-range missile defense missiles create a line of defense of up to a thousand kilometers, but with one condition, we are the first to strike and destroy the bulk of the US strategic nuclear forces before launch, of course, problems with Ohio submarines, but for them a separate surprise and Status-6 is not only for hitting the coast, but also for destroying the enemy submarines in an approximate location square, and apparently he will be able to pursue their submarines. Plasma, etc., with a laser-based laser in the atmosphere is completely ineffective, especially when it is cloudy, from here nonsense is born with a laser plane, etc. So far no one has come up with or comes up with a stronghold of the air defense / missile defense, because nuclear fission and especially nuclear fusion is the main achievement of mankind and the level of energy is incomparable. Their false goals do not differ from ours at all, this is the simplest and most effective means, there is no need to reinvent the wheel. The maneuvering of the blocks, of course, is a serious task, and by tradition we are a cut above them. SNF and TNW are all ours, but we will not give up this advantage. Trump will now take action to update his old-fashioned resource junk, but he needs 10 years to catch up with us. They could not make the soil complex, and we did it with separable blocks. They don’t have a heavyweight, but with us he passed the throw tests, even though the Voivode is still on duty. Something like this. Now the neutralization of the marine component is on the agenda, and we are again on top ....
                2. hrych
                  hrych 24 February 2018 08: 51
                  0
                  This is how nuclear defense works
                3. hrych
                  hrych 24 February 2018 09: 11
                  0
                  Verney air defense works like this
    2. Tiksi-3
      Tiksi-3 21 February 2018 08: 54
      0
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      how many maneuvering warheads can one rocket destroy ??? do not understand..

      probably he meant undermining the nuclear charge of the warhead, and as a result, the destruction of everything in the affected area ....
    3. novel66
      novel66 21 February 2018 09: 43
      +10
      yes any number! until the fuel burns out it will fly and knock on them
    4. Servisinzhener
      Servisinzhener 21 February 2018 12: 38
      0
      Most likely one, because the missile’s area is already after the separation of warheads.
  2. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 21 February 2018 08: 20
    +6
    I hope we do not know everything
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 21 February 2018 08: 22
      +2
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      I hope we do not know everything

      100% because:
      This system is also capable of destroying satellites, but in a very small sector above Moscow and in low orbits,
      - It sounds extremely unconvincing.
    2. Vita vko
      Vita vko 21 February 2018 08: 45
      +5
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      I hope we do not know everything

      Well, yes, it’s unpleasant to know that in the event of a missile strike over Moscow, a plasma cloud will be created in the stratosphere in which all warheads of ballistic missiles are guaranteed to burn. Just after the first echelon, the next echelon of warheads always follows, which is impossible to intercept under conditions of high ionization of the atmosphere. That is why they are now talking about the need to develop non-nuclear missile defense.
      1. dvina71
        dvina71 21 February 2018 10: 34
        0
        Wow .. I wonder what are you going to create a plasma there? How do you intend to control it ... support it? I’m looking at the city of Yabch about to destroy the bb .. good luck .. Finally, the language in the pro is intended to demolish the LC and change the flight path of the bb. And then those interceptors about which the article comes in and then a lower rank ... s-400 \ 300 \ beech \ shell ... everything will go into action.
        1. Servisinzhener
          Servisinzhener 21 February 2018 12: 42
          +1
          S-400/300 can still be depending on which version and which missiles. But Buk and Carapace-C are definitely not.
    3. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 21 February 2018 09: 15
      +5
      Victor, hi! hi
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      I hope we do not know everything

      You have no doubt: we only know what they consider necessary to tell us. Yes, and this business can be diluted with water. wink
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 21 February 2018 09: 35
        +5
        Hi colleagues soldier
        They are building a modern missile defense system, it’s gratifying and long time ago! Only central industrial areas protect, such is our concept of missile defense. New missile interceptors, it’s fine, too, to saturate the defense with them now, over time, it’s clear, too.
        At the expense of anti-ballistic missiles with vigorous warheads, like blowing away a whole swarm of attackers in one fell swoop? the interceptors of a non-nuclear type were checked, counted and began to make missiles - this is justified by all criteria! In principle, there are sound warheads for anti-missile defense, there is a methodology for their application, but at the very extreme!
        No one has an absolute defense against everything, everything, so the main deterrent is nuclear weapons of retaliation, let's not say attacks, air defense - missile defense everything is local ... it still needs to be developed, figs knows how events turn around !
        1. san4es
          san4es 21 February 2018 09: 50
          +2
          Quote: rocket757
          ... PVO - ABOUT everything is local ... it should still be and develop, her FIG knows how events turn around!

          hi
        2. Servisinzhener
          Servisinzhener 21 February 2018 12: 44
          0
          Most likely, in one fell swoop of all. And a warhead and simulators.
      2. san4es
        san4es 21 February 2018 09: 40
        +1
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        ... we only know what they consider necessary to inform us. Yes, and this business can be diluted with water. wink

        hi Hi Pash.


        In addition:
        The actual launch of the 53T6 missile defense soldier
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 21 February 2018 18: 43
          +2
          Sanya, salute! hi Thank you for the information support! wink
  3. Simon
    Simon 21 February 2018 08: 26
    +1
    Quote: Andrew Y.
    managed to create a homing warhead, then the rocket will be able to destroy the latest maneuvering nuclear warheads,
    how many maneuvering warheads can one rocket destroy ??? do not understand..

    Apparently a military secret. request recourse
  4. AntiFREEZ
    AntiFREEZ 21 February 2018 08: 33
    +5
    covering Moscow

    We in Siberia rejoice for ̶m̶o̶s̶k̶a̶l̶e̶y̶ Muscovites, or what? what
    1. Romario_Argo
      Romario_Argo 21 February 2018 08: 49
      +7
      A-235 rejoice for Muscovites
      and you can be happy for yourself as well. the mobile S-500 air defense system is already on its way, there is already a whole brigade in the iron with ACS, Mars radar and amplification radar
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 21 February 2018 09: 20
        +3
        And all of these S-500 air defense systems will also stand around Moscow - as an addition to the existing missile defense system.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 21 February 2018 10: 28
          +8
          Quote: Vadim237
          And all of these S-500 air defense systems will also stand around Moscow - as an addition to the existing missile defense system.

          According to the agreement, Amurov is on duty for a certain amount of time. And this agreement defines ONE city under the protection of such missile defense with anti-ballistic missiles ... the USSR chose Moscow, and the United States, in my opinion, Washington (I can be wrong, correct if this is not so) ..
          On May 26, 1972, the United States and the USSR signed the Treaty on the Limitation of Missile Defense Systems (entered into force on October 3, 1972). In accordance with the Treaty, the parties undertook to limit their missile defense systems to two complexes (the size of the complex itself is not more than 150 km with the number of anti-missile launchers no more than 100): around the capital and in the same area of ​​strategic nuclear missile mines. The agreement obliged the parties not to create or deploy space-based, airborne, sea-based or land-based missile defense systems or components.

          That is why the DON-2N radar was built.
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 21 February 2018 14: 13
            +4
            The Yankees "fully" defend only the positional area of ​​the Grand Forks intercontinental missile base; Washington defends only three missile defense installations.
            Nobody can protect their territory from a massive missile strike!
            There are positions of air defense and missile defense installations throughout the territory, in the most dangerous areas, there are air defense and missile defense, there is a ship component. Those. all objects / territories of interest to the enemy are protected from single / few attacks, there is a common system, that’s all. So far, the only deterrent is the inevitable blow of retaliation with nuclear weapons. Such is the bum.
    2. Evil543
      Evil543 21 February 2018 09: 17
      +2
      You can rejoice, we will have many times more victims, the population density is the same.
      1. Alex-a832
        Alex-a832 21 February 2018 09: 46
        +3
        Quote: Evil543
        You can rejoice, we will have many times more victims, the population density is the same.

        Why are you doing this, maybe a person who is not a dill, who ended up in Siberia to earn money and really wanted to rejoice for the safety of Muscovites ... lol
        1. Alex-a832
          Alex-a832 21 February 2018 10: 01
          +4
          Seriously, the missile defense breakthrough, I believe, is guaranteed on both sides, so we live in a relative world. I would like to hope that the number of warheads that have hypothetically reached the target in Russia will be a multiple of the number launched. Then, thanks to the uneven settlement of territories, the Russians will have a chance to survive. The USA, on the other hand, is more evenly populated, and they will be "drifted" in detail. That is, it will be difficult for surviving Americans to find a relatively “clean” corner for survival on their island. Conclusion: in the event of a global nuclear conflict, a thick polar fox will come to everyone and everyone.
    3. Servisinzhener
      Servisinzhener 21 February 2018 12: 45
      +2
      Restrained, because from a massive blow, it will not help. And none of the existing ones will help either.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 21 February 2018 14: 17
        +4
        None and designed NOW, in the near future.
        Improved air defense, improved means of attack!
        Those. Stone Age, at best, guaranteed to the whole planet!
    4. rocket757
      rocket757 21 February 2018 14: 18
      +3
      Everyone will have one fate, do not hesitate!
  5. Victor_B
    Victor_B 21 February 2018 08: 45
    +3
    how many maneuvering warheads can one rocket destroy ??? do not understand..
    100500 will arrange?
    Well, seriously, then:
    1. Americans certainly have maneuvering warheads, but here on our sofas there was little information about them. But about our super-hyper-maneuverable BB sofas rubbed tongues. (Moreover, they really are and really super-hyper)
    2. It is impossible to create an impenetrable missile defense / air defense system. The more perfect you have it, the simpler, dumb, the outfit of forces increases to overcome it.
    3. With a full-fledged thermonuclear strike of an ICBM in Moscow, I believe that the first or second warhead will be detonated in near space and electromagnetic radiation and subsequent ionospheric disturbances simply will not allow the guidance radar to work.

    I think so! (c) (voice of Mimino)
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 21 February 2018 09: 13
      -1
      Obviously the same goes for the US missile defense?
      Or is it super-invulnerable?
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 21 February 2018 09: 22
        +2
        But the fact remains - the number of satellites, ground-based radars and missile defense in the United States is growing every year.
      2. Servisinzhener
        Servisinzhener 21 February 2018 12: 50
        +1
        They have exactly the same picture. They cannot give a 100% guarantee, and most likely, therefore, they cannot even attack such a missile power as North Korea. Apparently there is no person who could take responsibility to declare that not one warhead will fall on the territory. USA.
    2. Ascetic
      Ascetic 21 February 2018 09: 22
      +4
      Quote: Victor_B
      1. Americans certainly have maneuvering warheads, but here on our sofas there was little information about them. But about our super-hyper-maneuverable BB sofas rubbed tongues. (Moreover, they really are and really super-hyper)

      To break through the missile defense systems, it is most efficient, simpler, more reliable and cheaper to install conventional unguided individual guided missile blocks on a target and a complex of missile defense systems (KSPPO) on strategic missiles, which was done.
      An individual guidance maneuvering unit is such a unit that, after separation from the last stage of the rocket, independently changes its flight path, which makes it difficult to intercept missile defense systems. On such a unit should be installed:
      - engines with the necessary fuel supply;
      - governing bodies;
      - a control and guidance system for the target.

      Essentially, such blocks are small rockets. Similar blocks were developed both in the USA and in the USSR. In the United States, extensive research on the creation of maneuvering warheads (ACE, AMARV, BGRV programs) ended at the stage of experimental flight tests - it didn’t go further
      Another thing is the so-called planning BB both conventional and hypersonic gliders, these are essentially independent aircraft delivered to space using ICBMs. Together, they can be called rocket-planning systems.

      The first half of this year was marked by media reports about successful tests in Russia and China of hypersonic aircraft, which are planning hypersonic warheads of ballistic missiles detachable from the carrier. The Russian “Object 4202” and the Chinese WU-14 testify to a new round in the nuclear missile (and, importantly, non-nuclear) technology race. For the time being, it is a race of technologies, not armaments, because both Russian, Chinese, and American (HTV-2 and AHW) experimental hypersonic aircraft did not go beyond the stage of development and testing.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 21 February 2018 09: 26
        0
        "Experimental hypersonic aircraft did not go beyond the stage of development work and testing." Alas, for sure we cannot say this - as we cannot say for sure - "In the USA, extensive research on the creation of maneuvering warheads (ACE, AMARV, BGRV programs) ended at the stage of experimental flight tests - it didn’t go further."
      2. Victor_B
        Victor_B 21 February 2018 09: 34
        0
        To break through the missile defense systems, it is most efficient, simpler, more reliable and cheaper to install conventional unguided individual guided missile blocks on a target and a complex of missile defense systems (KSPPO) on strategic missiles, which was done.
        Well, what prevents to undermine a couple in the upper layers / near space?
        A few tens of minutes of ionospheric disturbance guarantee the inability to operate the missile defense radar.
        Well, this "terrible" legendary EMP! (For resistance to which all electronic components are tested).
        Indeed, for the guaranteed destruction of Moscow and the entire industrial region, more than a dozen BBs are only needed that have successfully hit their targets.
  6. san4es
    san4es 21 February 2018 09: 36
    +2
    “Nudoli is a modernized version of the 80T53 missile defense system created back in the 6s


    53T6 missile defense
    PR is made according to the “bearing cone” scheme without aerodynamic bearing and control elements, with a special heat-protective coating. As control and stabilization elements, gas-jet engines with a thrust vector directed perpendicular to the axis of the rocket were used. OL has a single-stage circuit with a detachable warhead. The engine used quick-burning gunpowder. For 4 seconds of engine operation, the rocket accelerated to maximum speed. In this case, axial overloads reached 300 units, and the sheathing temperature rose to 2000 degrees. At the same time, the PR reached a speed of more than 4 km / s. According to eyewitnesses of the tests, the speed of the rocket is so huge that it is impossible to see the rocket when leaving the silos and keep track of it at the time of flight. In the combustion chambers of the engines, there is not combustion, but a controlled explosion.

  7. Dormidont
    Dormidont 21 February 2018 09: 51
    0
    For our Western and Middle Eastern partners, no missiles are a pity
  8. Old26
    Old26 21 February 2018 09: 53
    +4
    Quote: Andrew Y.
    managed to create a homing warhead, then the rocket will be able to destroy the latest maneuvering nuclear warheads,
    how many maneuvering warheads can one rocket destroy ??? do not understand..

    At best one

    Quote: Tiksi-3
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    how many maneuvering warheads can one rocket destroy ??? do not understand..

    probably he meant undermining the nuclear charge of the warhead, and as a result, the destruction of everything in the affected area ....

    There were rumors about the development of a fragmentation warhead for this missile, or even kinetic. What is applied - HZ

    Quote: Andrew Y.
    .... because:
    This system is also capable of destroying satellites, but in a very small sector above Moscow and in low orbits,
    - It sounds extremely unconvincing.

    Moreover, not just unconvincing, but generally beyond consciousness. If the previous model had a destruction range of 100 km and a reach of 30 km in height, the path could even double these parameters as a result of modernization (which is unlikely), then the reach in height became 60 km. Something I did not hear satellites flying at such an altitude

    Quote: Victor_B
    Well, seriously, then:
    1. Americans certainly have maneuvering warheads, but here on our sofas there was little information about them. But about our super-hyper-maneuverable BB sofas rubbed tongues. (Moreover, they really are and really super-hyper)

    But seriously, then no one else has maneuvering heads in service. tests are being conducted, in particular of the same product 4202. But they are not in service. Recent work was on the product 15A18M Voevoda before the collapse of the Union, when such a 15F178 warhead was tested. Moreover, having dimensions about three times larger than regular BG rockets, this BG had a capacity of about 150 kt instead of the same 750 kt at the Voevody RGCh.
    So the phrases about intercepting maneuvering BGs are more likely “For a red word”.

    Quote: Victor_B
    Well, seriously, then:
    2. It is impossible to create an impenetrable missile defense / air defense system. The more perfect you have it, the simpler, dumb, the outfit of forces increases to overcome it.

    Absolutely right. Moreover, overcoming the missile defense system is much cheaper than creating an impenetrable missile defense.
    Elementary simple.
    Let a missile have a probability of hitting a target equal to 0,85.
    This means that for the total probability of hitting a target equal to 0,999 must have 4 interceptors. When you have a “simple target" like the modern North Korean without a missile defense missile defense system, you need to defeat such a target FOUR interceptor

    But here the opposite side decides to replace the monoblock with an RGC. And he launches a missile at the enemy, similar to our Voivode. What do we have in the dry residue.
    • 10 war blocks
    • At least 4 heavy false targets
    (small things, such as scraps of foil, balloons and other things will not be considered. So, there are a minimum of 14 goalsthat can "reach the ground" because heavy false targets repeat the characteristics of warheads. Plus, along the same trajectory, it will also fly breeding stage. Total 15 goals. For 100% interception will be needed already 60 interceptors.
    QUESTION FOR FILLING - WHAT IS EASIER
    • Deploy one ICBM with an RFG or
    • Deploy 60 interceptors with their mines, radars and more?

    or

    • Deploy two ICBMs with an RFG or
    • Deploy 120 interceptors with their mines, radars and more?

    Quote: Victor_B
    Well, seriously, then:
    3. With a full-fledged thermonuclear strike of an ICBM in Moscow, I believe that the first or second warhead will be detonated in near space and electromagnetic radiation and subsequent ionospheric disturbances simply will not allow the guidance radar to work.

    It’s a very real scenario.
    Although tests at one time showed that SPRN radars were recovering after an EMR nuclear explosion in about 10 minutes

    Quote: Victor_B
    I think so! (c) (voice of Mimino)

    "You are going the right way, comrades," that is, you think correctly laughing

    Quote: Mestny
    Obviously the same goes for the US missile defense?
    Or is it super-invulnerable?

    Absolutely the same. While there is no advantage in the form of using missile defense systems based on other physical principles, there is no way to go anywhere from the theory of probability. And the chatter about their missile defense system is designed mainly for the layman
  9. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 21 February 2018 11: 36
    0
    This is the "last frontier of defense"


    That's for sure...
  10. Tektor
    Tektor 21 February 2018 18: 01
    0
    The more 53T6 missile defense will be on alert, the more states should send nuclear warheads to Moscow. Now, they say that up to 80 warheads are sent to Moscow. And this no longer guarantees a breakthrough of the missile defense system of the central region ... (S300V4, S400, Buk-M3) And the total number of nuclear weapons is limited to START-3. Those. industrial centers for which warheads aren’t enough can be saved ... So our civilization will not die out. This is damn important!
  11. Old26
    Old26 21 February 2018 19: 45
    0
    Quote: Tektor
    The more 53T6 missile defense will be on alert, the more states should send nuclear warheads to Moscow.

    There are no more interceptor missiles than there are now. EMNIP mines for these missiles around Moscow 68.

    Quote: Tektor
    Now, they say that up to 80 warheads are sent to Moscow.

    Hardly. The outfit is so unlikely. As far as I remember from the published American plans, the number of BG sent to the capital is 7 or 8. The missile defense system around Moscow was capable of intercepting up to 16 pair targets, that is, up to 32 targets. So hardly 80 warheads are a real figure. And in principle, 80 warheads would have easily broken through Moscow’s missile defense

    Quote: Tektor
    S300V4, S400, Buk-M3

    None of these, from these systems, intercept ICBM warheads. Not those complexes, not those speeds

    Quote: rocket757
    The Yankees "fully" defend only the positional area of ​​the Grand Forks intercontinental missile base; Washington defends only three missile defense installations.

    Already does not protect. EMNIP year in 1985, the Seyfgard complex was mothballed, and the Spartan and Sprint missiles were removed from combat duty
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 21 February 2018 21: 36
      0
      "C300B4, C400" These complexes will have the opportunity to shoot down warheads at the final stretch, at altitudes from 35 kilometers and below and in a radius of up to 100 kilometers - the SPRN system is also connected to air defense - missile defense systems.