Military Review

Iran replied to Netanyah, who compared the Iranian nuclear agreement with the Munich agreement 1938 of the year

45
The media published the details of the speech of the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Munich Security Conference. Netanyahu’s main speech was devoted to Iran and the so-called “Iranian nuclear program”. The greatest resonance in the speech of the head of the Israeli Cabinet to the audience caused a statement that the nuclear deal with Iran was a huge mistake, and the agreement “reminds the Munich Agreement of the 1938 model of the year”.


From Netanyahu’s statement:
This is an unfortunate act of appeasing the aggressor. This is the same thing that happened in Europe in 1938 year - the Munich Agreement of a number of countries with Nazi Germany. And now the deal with Iran has begun a countdown to the appearance of a nuclear arsenal.


Iran replied to Netanyah, who compared the Iranian nuclear agreement with the Munich agreement 1938 of the year


According to the Israeli prime minister, the agreement is built entirely on flaws and has no correct limitations.

Netanyahu:
There are no restrictions on the associated work on enrichment of uranium. It contains regulations for an insufficient number of inspections. Ultimately, this is the path to nuclear capabilities in a country that threatens the security of the entire region.


In Iran, they commented on Netanyahu’s statement, calling it an attempt to shift everything “from a sick head to a healthy one”. Tehran urged Netanyahu to recognize Israel’s nuclear weapons and do not look for it in other countries.

Netanyahu's statement was commented on by ex-head of the US State Department, John Kerry, who is in Munich. He is quoted by the Iranian news agency. IRNA:
Netanyahu and I (Benjamin) disagree on many issues, today he said that in 10 years, Iran will begin to build a nuclear arsenal. It is not accurate. I believe that Iran is a threat, but if we leave the deal, a very difficult situation is created. Then Iran will not trust our steps, and this is bad diplomacy, an unwise strategy.
Photos used:
www.globallookpress.com
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. siberalt
    siberalt 19 February 2018 07: 08
    +5
    It is understandable. If Israel in the BV holds the core in the bosom against all, then someone must resist this. winked
    1. Logall
      Logall 19 February 2018 07: 12
      +4
      Quote: siberalt
      core in the bosom against all, then someone must resist this.

      They should all ... Scatter alone.
      1. Hanokem
        Hanokem 19 February 2018 09: 06
        +2
        Obama is the Chamberlain of our time ...
        1. Geisenberg
          Geisenberg 19 February 2018 13: 15
          +1
          Quote: Hanokem
          Obama is the Chamberlain of our time ...


          Don’t come to the forum anymore ...
        2. ibirus
          ibirus 19 February 2018 15: 01
          0
          And who is Hitler?
    2. ancestors from Don
      ancestors from Don 19 February 2018 07: 49
      +9
      Israel wants to have a monopoly on the use of nuclear weapons, it undoubtedly has it, then let international observers allow their nuclear facilities ...... they are in no hurry negative .
      1. Warrior with machine gun
        Warrior with machine gun 19 February 2018 11: 55
        +3
        that’s the trick, the difference between nuclear Iran and nuclear Israel, and nothing, except for the fact that some want to have nuclear weapons and legalize it, while others already have an arsenal, they just prefer everyone to forget about it.
  2. Herculesic
    Herculesic 19 February 2018 07: 09
    +11
    The first article today about Israel is a website with an initiative! ! wassat In general, netanyahu is simply aimed at war - it happens when you give a shot to the weak, and even the statement of our Frolov betrayed Benjamin! Now behind him is not only the United States, but also someone named Frolov, who made a statement for some reason on behalf of our Russia, to which his people did not authorize!
    1. Mikhail m
      Mikhail m 19 February 2018 07: 15
      +5
      Quote: Herkulesich
      someone named Frolov

      Is he still working? The statement is not commented in any way? So not gag carried. Above you need to look for the source.
    2. Krasnodar
      Krasnodar 19 February 2018 07: 15
      +4
      Quote: Herkulesich
      The first article today about Israel is a website with an initiative! ! wassat In general, netanyahu is simply aimed at war - it happens when you give a shot to the weak, and even the statement of our Frolov betrayed Benjamin! Now behind him is not only the United States, but also someone named Frolov, who made a statement for some reason on behalf of our Russia, to which his people did not authorize!

      With all due respect to the States, the military power of Russia, as well as Mr. Frolov personally, Natanyaga’s "romance" with Iran began even at the beginning of the Obama cadet, which, in fact, signed a nuclear deal with the Persians. ))) Largely to the peak of Bibi and Amer Republicans.
    3. Dormidont
      Dormidont 19 February 2018 07: 17
      +6
      One can feel the old school of Andrei Kozyrev, when, hiding behind the carcass of Bukharik Yeltsin, Russia was robbed by the Berezovskys - Gusinsky and others
  3. Dormidont
    Dormidont 19 February 2018 07: 13
    +1
    Ungrateful thing to engage in polemics with them
  4. MadCat
    MadCat 19 February 2018 07: 14
    +7
    Ayatollah Khamenei just the laurels of the Fuhrer at night dreaming of the conquest pulled. But Israel did not go to the borders of Iran in fact.
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 19 February 2018 07: 26
      +9
      Strange - in my opinion, Israel bombed a nuclear power plant in Iran and not vice versa! Iranians shout a lot, but because of sanctions, their economy is weak, which excludes Iran’s attack on Israel in the coming decades.
      1. Strips
        Strips 19 February 2018 07: 30
        +7
        Quote: Herkulesich
        Strange - in my opinion, Israel bombed a nuclear power plant in Iran and not vice versa!


        You have beguiled Iran with Iraq (destruction of a nuclear reactor in Iraq).

        Can your problems and such strange posts come from here? From not knowing what is going on? wink
        1. insular
          insular 19 February 2018 08: 27
          +3
          Quote: Tiras
          Can your problems and such strange posts come from here? From not knowing what is going on?

          Yes, he was mistaken, BUT, this changes the meaning. Below, the international political reaction to the operation "Babylon" (aka "Opera"):
          The world community has sharply condemned Israel for a military invasion. The UN Security Council condemned the actions of Israel in resolution 487 [8]. Israel’s actions were qualified as a violation of the UN Charter and international law. The Security Council demanded that Israel pay compensation to Iraq and refrain from such actions in the future. In Israel itself, many of the members of the opposition, and headed by Shimon Peres, criticized the government’s decision. In response to the bombing of Iraq, the United States temporarily suspended arms supplies to Israel

          It is Israel that regularly violates all conceivable and inconceivable provisions of the UN Charter.
          Israel is an aggressor with nuclear weapons.
          1. Krasnodar
            Krasnodar 19 February 2018 08: 41
            +1
            Before Israel, the Persians tried to bomb the Iraqi reactor, (this was during the Iran-Iraq war), but failed. The Israeli operation most likely was agreed with the ayatols, as Before the bombing of the reactor, the Iranians raised their aircraft along the entire front line.
            Neither the Persians nor the Jews had any illusions about Iraq’s intentions on nuclear energy. Hussein used chemical weapons against Iran.
          2. Strips
            Strips 19 February 2018 08: 47
            +4
            And what do we see? In the end, Israel was right to strike.


            Quote: insular
            It is Israel that regularly violates all conceivable and inconceivable provisions of the UN Charter.


            Given the bias of the UN, this is not surprising.
            As if you are not aware of the UN bias towards Russia.
            I’m even afraid to imagine how many accusations and resolutions there would be against Russia at the UN if it did not have the veto power in the UN Security Council


            Israel is an aggressor with nuclear weapons.


            Fantasy, given that it was the Arab countries that did not live in peace and Israel interfered with their existence.

            But Israel had good relations with the Persians until the Islamic fanatics gained power in Iran. Now Iran is helping terrorists around Israel act against Israel.

        2. Warrior with machine gun
          Warrior with machine gun 19 February 2018 11: 59
          +3
          and regular air strikes, on the territory of other countries, sometimes even from the territory of other countries, are also a mistake, or a natural greyhound.
      2. Krasnodar
        Krasnodar 19 February 2018 07: 34
        0
        Quote: Herkulesich
        Strange - in my opinion, Israel bombed a nuclear power plant in Iran and not vice versa! Iranians shout a lot, but because of sanctions, their economy is weak, which excludes Iran’s attack on Israel in the coming decades.

        There is no kenguru in Austria
        (There is no kangaroo in Austria).
    2. Kisso4kin
      Kisso4kin 19 February 2018 08: 28
      +2
      And don't say ...
    3. PalBor
      PalBor 19 February 2018 08: 45
      +1
      Quote: MadCat
      Ayatollah Khamenei just the laurels of the Fuhrer at night dreaming of the conquest pulled. But Israel did not go to the borders of Iran in fact.

      Yeah, it seems like the Israelis only dream of Iran attacking them. Look, don’t oversleep when Saudi’s best friends with emirs hit in the back.
      And then before the Second World War - there! And suddenly, the "famine" ...
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 19 February 2018 07: 23
    +6
    Then Iran will not trust our steps, and this is bad diplomacy, an unreasonable strategy.

    In this situation, it is not strange, but Kerry was smarter than Netanyahu. Although Iran does not really trust the United States and does not trust Israel at all.
    "Recalls the Munich conspiracy of the sample of 1938."
    And what does the production of a silent glanders of nuclear weapons by Israel remind us of? The Iran agreement - the “Munich agreement” - it was necessary to say such a thing. It is not clear if Israel does not want Iran to conduct nuclear development, then why all this. Or was it necessary to impose even tougher sanctions on Iran and then the Jews would feel better, and the Iranians would continue active work?
    1. Strips
      Strips 19 February 2018 07: 56
      +2
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Or was it necessary to impose even tougher sanctions on Iran and then the Jews would feel better, and the Iranians would continue active work?


      Due to the strong sanctions, the Iranians may possibly throw off the ayatollah regime. The Iranians are not North Koreans, whose brains are completely brainwashed and who idolize Eun.
      The Iranians did not really like living in sanctions, and if even tougher sanctions are introduced than those that were before the partial lifting (the US still uses sanctions, although partial), they may go against the top of Iran.

      It will be interesting soon, since Trump said in January that he had last extended the regime for lifting sanctions against Tehran. Therefore, if this is so, then the US will soon impose powerful sanctions back.
      1. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 19 February 2018 08: 01
        +5
        Iranians may throw off Ayatollah regime
        The Americans also thought about Russia, introducing more and more sanctions, which I do not see the end in. AND?
        1. Strips
          Strips 19 February 2018 08: 15
          +2
          Quote: rotmistr60
          The Americans also thought about Russia, introducing more and more sanctions, which I do not see the end in. AND?


          The Americans have not yet introduced these sanctions, and already the tax burden is growing even stronger in 2018, gas prices have climbed up in recent years, the reserve fund has been spent, there is not enough money in the pension fund and they began to borrow from the NWF. More and more real talk about raising the retirement age.
          1. Krasnodar
            Krasnodar 19 February 2018 08: 23
            -1
            Quote: Tiras
            Quote: rotmistr60
            The Americans also thought about Russia, introducing more and more sanctions, which I do not see the end in. AND?


            The Americans have not yet introduced these sanctions, and already the tax burden is growing even stronger in 2018, gas prices have climbed up in recent years, the reserve fund has been spent, there is not enough money in the pension fund and they began to borrow from the NWF. More and more real talk about raising the retirement age.

            This is mainly a consequence of the fall in oil prices. Of the sanctions, only the deprivation of access to long, cheap money hurt, the rest is garbage.
            1. Strips
              Strips 19 February 2018 08: 43
              +2
              Quote: Krasnodar
              This is mainly a consequence of the fall in oil prices. Of the sanctions, only the deprivation of access to long, cheap money hurt, the rest is garbage.


              Is Sberbank afraid of opening up in Crimea because of sanctions because of this garbage? wink

              Sanctions affect not only the end of cheap loans, but also because of many other reasons.

              Of course, the fall in oil prices is also a strong blow to Russia, probably no less than sanctions, which in principle are rather weak, but given the enormous corruption and the inability to spend money in a balanced way, now problems are growing in Russia.
              1. Krasnodar
                Krasnodar 19 February 2018 09: 52
                -1
                Quote: Tiras
                Quote: Krasnodar
                This is mainly a consequence of the fall in oil prices. Of the sanctions, only the deprivation of access to long, cheap money hurt, the rest is garbage.


                Is Sberbank afraid of opening up in Crimea because of sanctions because of this garbage? wink

                Sanctions affect not only the end of cheap loans, but also because of many other reasons.

                Of course, the fall in oil prices is also a strong blow to Russia, probably no less than sanctions, which in principle are rather weak, but given the enormous corruption and the inability to spend money in a balanced way, now problems are growing in Russia.

                These problems have always been - oil was a real blow. For banks - as everyone escaped from Rotenberg's SMP after being on the sanctions lists, then all the banks got into trouble and are in no hurry to Crimea.
    2. KonoGon
      KonoGon 19 February 2018 11: 48
      +2
      Quote: rotmistr60
      "Munich agreement"
      Israel seems to have clearly expressed its position: "Never shall I be Czechoslovakia." Need to bomb? Bomb, Do I have to fight? There will be a war. Got hipes? Will be. Otherwise, Polsha will one day say that: The Holocaust? and what do the Poles have to do with it? Have you already stated? It's only the beginning. But Israel is not already mittens in Israel.
  6. Vard
    Vard 19 February 2018 07: 29
    +9
    Fussed ... So Iran is doing everything right ...
  7. Egorovich
    Egorovich 19 February 2018 07: 35
    +8
    A country that threatens the security of the entire BV is clearly crafted, not Iran. Israel from the beginning of its existence is an aggressor and remains so to this day.
    1. Strips
      Strips 19 February 2018 07: 48
      +5
      Quote: Egorovich
      Israel from the beginning of its existence is an aggressor and remains so to this day.


      This opinion is common among those countries that Israel put in place when they tried to destroy it, but got it in full.


      Resentment she is so ... Bad Israel, bad, does not allow itself to be destroyed crying


      Israel is a terrible aggressor, because it did not let the Arabs destroy itself, it does not allow Iranian terrorists to settle near its borders and carry out terrorist attacks.

      And it is worth recalling that it was the Arab countries that did not agree to the UN plan for the partition of Palestine.
      1. Krasnodar
        Krasnodar 19 February 2018 07: 51
        +1
        Quote: Tiras
        Quote: Egorovich
        Israel from the beginning of its existence is an aggressor and remains so to this day.


        This opinion is common among those countries that Israel put in place when they tried to destroy it, but got it in full.


        Resentment she is so ... Bad Israel, bad, does not allow itself to be destroyed crying


        Israel is a terrible aggressor, because it did not let the Arabs destroy itself, it does not allow Iranian terrorists to settle near its borders and carry out terrorist attacks.

        And it is worth recalling that it was the Arab countries that did not agree to the UN plan for the partition of Palestine.

        Not only didn’t agree, but invaded the territory of Israel on the day of its independence
  8. ancestors from Don
    ancestors from Don 19 February 2018 07: 51
    +1
    Quote: Herkulesich
    The first article today about Israel is a website with an initiative! ! wassat In general, netanyahu is simply aimed at war - it happens when you give a shot to the weak, and even the statement of our Frolov betrayed Benjamin! Now behind him is not only the United States, but also someone named Frolov, who made a statement for some reason on behalf of our Russia, to which his people did not authorize!

    Someone Frolov is simply obliged to be fired without severance pay, to make such statements in an explosive region is a crime and incitement of aggressors.
  9. shans2
    shans2 19 February 2018 08: 01
    +3
    Iran will never be the first to strike) they all know this perfectly well, it is pointless to provoke it) it hasn’t fought with its neighbors for a while, it has only fought off Iraq .... So, you can forget the attempts of Netanyah and other thieves in power to ride in the conflict and avoid jail). Putin won, fortify the Jews, pay and repent there and good mood to you, bugog)
    1. Strips
      Strips 19 February 2018 08: 24
      +2
      Quote: shans2
      Iran will never be the first to hit) everyone knows it all, it makes no sense to provoke it)


      He has enough terrorists who do the work for him. Near Israel, these are Hezbollah terrorists who are directly subordinate to Iran, as Iran pays Hamas terrorists, Islamic jihad.
      Not to mention other countries where Iran acts to destabilize the situation.
  10. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 19 February 2018 08: 12
    +3
    Israel is engaged in defamation of Iran. Calls in advance the aggressor and compares with Nazi Germany.
    The United States also denigrates Russia. Almost word for word. The difference is that when Russia is blackened, the Molotov-Ribentrop Pact is mentioned, and in the case of Iran, the Munich agreement.
    Everything goes to provoke military aggression from Iran - and the aggressor has already been determined ...
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 19 February 2018 08: 25
      +2
      They’re just scared! The prospect of being washed away into the sea, for example, cannot please them.
      Until now, it has been rolling out to quarrel all neighbors among themselves and to spoil everyone individually ... after all, no one forgot that.
      Iran can crush Syria, really, then the Jews can become completely sour .... maybe, but not necessarily, by the way,
      1. Alex-a832
        Alex-a832 19 February 2018 08: 58
        +3
        hi In Israel, as usual, overseas tribesmen Zionists stand behind their backs under the mattress banner. Calculation is being built on this roof. If you do not take into account the allies of all parties, then Iran is now the most powerful state in the region. This is used to get Iran into the fray. Unfortunately, that might work. If Iran tries to bend Syria, then everyone will come out against it, including with weapon. This option, Israel, as I understand it, will suit. The result for Iran will be even more deplorable than if it reaches only the Jews. Natural chess combinations - East, however ...
        1. XXXIII
          XXXIII 19 February 2018 10: 03
          +2
          Quote: Alex-a832
          hi In Israel, as usual, overseas tribesmen Zionists stand behind their backs under the mattress banner. Calculation is being built on this roof. If you do not take into account the allies of all parties, then Iran is now the most powerful state in the region. This is used to get Iran into the fray. Unfortunately, that might work. If Iran tries to bend Syria, then everyone will come out against it, including with weapon. This option, Israel, as I understand it, will suit. The result for Iran will be even more deplorable than if it reaches only the Jews. Natural chess combinations - East, however ...
          Iran is already everywhere where it can be in the BV and by the way it has more support from neighbors, for example, the Turks will gladly share the Syrian cake with Iran, but even the allies do not want to share Israel. Here Israel is pursuing a one-man policy in the BV, relying on the fact that the Allies will rush to help him at the first whistle. The allies need war, not Israel’s victory, they will take the victory for themselves, and leave the ruins of the Jew. hi
        2. rocket757
          rocket757 19 February 2018 11: 41
          +2
          Yes, striped sales here are not over the bout, but I can’t be interested in it!
          Of course, Iran has something to be proud of, only where can it lead ???
          I am not for Israel and not against Iran, it’s just that a mix can happen in which we have nothing to do, Iran is not trying for our common interests! And the formula that the enemy of my enemy, my sculpted friend, many times more than once, brought under a very bad!
          The guys need to look more carefully at the events and certainly not make rash statements!
  11. Rostislav
    Rostislav 19 February 2018 08: 57
    +1
    Ultimately, this is the path to nuclear capabilities in a country that threatens the security of the entire region.

    Truly, from a sick head to a healthy one. Iran didn’t attack anyone, unlike Israel.
    1. XXXIII
      XXXIII 19 February 2018 09: 42
      +1
      Quote: Rostislav
      Ultimately, this is the path to nuclear capabilities in a country that threatens the security of the entire region.

      Truly, from a sick head to a healthy one. Iran didn’t attack anyone, unlike Israel.

      Bibi became like a radical, every day about a war with Iran, as if he were directly asking for this war. Each time, Iran replies that it is not necessary to climb and break what the Jews did not build, but these break everything, even bomb everything under their noses. It’s just that Bibi looks like a fanatic, where you could hear Netanyahu calling for peace, you can only hear, take, not give, isolate, but sometimes shoot from your village ..... hi
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. ibirus
    ibirus 19 February 2018 15: 12
    +1
    Everything is extremely simple - Israel uses the threat of Iran to knock money out of the United States. Iran understands that it cannot overcome the war with the Jews because of the nuclear weapons of Israel and because of the technical backlog of its armed forces. So far, if we discard the rhetoric of Middle Eastern players, Israel has inflicted blows on Iran, and not vice versa. What is the guarantee that then Israel’s atomic warheads will not fly to Iran because of any danger from the latter. It was clear to everyone that after the appearance of nuclear weapons among the Jews, all Israel’s neighbors would want to have it (unless, of course, the principle is confessed with the Arabs: “What is allowed to Jupiter, the bull is not allowed”) In general, we don’t care if Israel catches up again with neighbors, Alah-Babaham will be where to look. winked
  14. Weyland
    Weyland 19 February 2018 20: 48
    +1
    in general, the agreement "resembles the Munich agreement of the 1938 model." - said the leader of the country, which over the past 70 years has grabbed a bunch of territories from its neighbors and to this day regularly makes air attacks on its neighbors - to the country that last fought an aggressive war 275 years ago!