Military Review

Minsk and Helsinki are ready to send their peacekeepers to Donbass

58
The readiness to send their peacekeeping contingents to the Donbass after an earlier initiative was expressed by representatives of several countries. In particular, it became aware of the readiness to deploy peacekeeping missions in the Donbas from Belarus and Finland. According to the Finnish President Sauli Niinistö, the Finnish army will advance to the conflict area as soon as a decision is made at the international level.


At the same time, President Niinistö noted that if there is even a small opportunity to resolve the crisis in Ukraine, then this opportunity should be used. According to the President of Finland, the armed forces of the country are ready to create peacekeeping units to resolve the protracted armed conflict.

Minsk and Helsinki are ready to send their peacekeepers to Donbass


The readiness of sending their peacekeepers to the Donbass was once again confirmed by the Belarusian authorities. The Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus, Vladimir Makei, noted that this issue was discussed with Kurt Walker (US special envoy to Ukraine) who was present at the Munich Security Conference.

RIA News quotes Vladimir Makei:
We requested a meeting, and it took place with the US special envoy to Ukraine, Mr. Walker. It is only possible to confirm the readiness of Belarus to participate in any form, the possible direction of the contingent to this region, if this is acceptable to all parties involved in this conflict.


Makei said that Moscow and Kiev should approach a compromise solution for deploying a peacekeeping contingent in the Donbas. Recall that Ukraine declares the need to place peacekeepers on the border with the Russian Federation. Russia responds to this by the fact that shelling is carried out not on the border of Russia, but along the line of contact between the parties, where it would be worthwhile to place international peacekeepers.
Photos used:
https://en.wikipedia.org
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Zoldat_A
    Zoldat_A 19 February 2018 07: 02
    +20
    Well, with the Finns, it’s clear ... And Old Man again stretches one seat on two chairs? Belarusian shrimp and kiwi have already been tried - only peacekeepers have not yet been seen ....
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 19 February 2018 07: 13
      +5
      A lake named after Lukashenko will appear there, in that lake they will raise lochs, that is, the European Union will continue to send its fish products to us through Belarus, simultaneously introducing new American sanctions against us - now we buy a little from them all!
      1. Jack
        Jack 19 February 2018 07: 21
        +28
        Herculesovich.
        A country that is surrounded by seas, but cannot provide its citizens with seafood, is doomed to eat Belarusian shrimp!
        1. Zoldat_A
          Zoldat_A 19 February 2018 07: 35
          +24
          Quote: Jack

          Country, which is surrounded by seas, but cannot provide its citizens with seafood, Doomed to eat Belarusian shrimp!

          For example, I myself eat Russian crayfish, as well as pikeperch, carp, carp and in a coffin in white slippers I saw strange shrimps - and Belarusian and any others. So don’t doom Russia to hunger without “Belarusian shrimp”! negative By the way, I go to the market almost every day and did not notice any lack of seafood. For every taste and budget - from pollock for 120 rubles to almost any Far Eastern fish.
          А who for 25 years of "democracy" does not think of beer without shrimp - so they don’t know much more in life ...
          1. Pax tecum
            Pax tecum 19 February 2018 08: 55
            +11
            The jack is absolutely right!
            The difference between river fish and sea fish (sea seafood) is enormous, then. Including in production volumes, gastronomic properties, etc.
            Indeed, why a country that is surrounded by seas cannot provide its citizens with seafood? Don't want to bother? Does the market itself “clear out” everything? Here and "taxis". There are quotas, but the sale is all over the hill. Infinite capitalism, however.
        2. Bosch
          Bosch 19 February 2018 08: 40
          +4
          It can not, but does not want. And much more that she does not want.
          1. helmi8
            helmi8 19 February 2018 15: 48
            +1
            Quote: Bosch
            It can not, but does not want. And much more that she does not want.

            Absolutely to the point! Everything that is caught is sold to Norway, China, Japan and then we buy processed products from them. Marasmus! We buy our own at exorbitant prices! Looks like a strong man in the Ministry of Fisheries kickbacks have ...
        3. PalBor
          PalBor 19 February 2018 09: 01
          0
          True, the seas are not tropical.
        4. Piramidon
          Piramidon 19 February 2018 09: 36
          +1
          Quote: Jack
          Herculesovich.
          A country that is surrounded by seas, but cannot provide its citizens with seafood, is doomed to eat Belarusian shrimp!

          This is not the first time I've met your post on this site. Like a carbon copy. No need to talk about the country with the submission of any yellow newspaper and Ukrosayt. I live in Russia, far from the sea and, if desired, I can buy any seafood. Prices are another question, but the fact that these products are available is a fact. I can send (in PM) photos from our counters.
          PSYou are probably one of those who supply shrimp and sea cucumbers from Belarus to Russia?
        5. sib.ataman
          sib.ataman 19 February 2018 11: 10
          0
          Of course, I can understand a hungry peasant surrounded by swamps and forests of the Bialowieza Forest, nervously staring somewhere in a selpo on a counter with spread Bialarus shrimps from a nearby swamp, and fragrant avocados from a neighboring area, only yesterday gathered in the morning from a frost, an evil sniffer snot at the thought that again for dinner you will have some crap instead of a bulb with eggs and bacon! But I just can’t understand how, from there, from the tops of the trees, he saw that here in the bazaars and in supermarkets all over Siberia they are being plundered by mere mortals under the guise of pollock, pink salmon, sterlet, herring, saffron cod, and even dash what! Sneaky sneak whispers ?!
    2. 210ox
      210ox 19 February 2018 07: 14
      +4
      Everyone just wants to make money. And some money, and political points.
      Quote: Zoldat_A
      Well, with the Finns, it’s clear ... And Old Man again stretches one seat on two chairs? Belarusian shrimp and kiwi have already been tried - only peacekeepers have not yet been seen ....
    3. Pax tecum
      Pax tecum 19 February 2018 07: 25
      +8
      The picture is incorrect in the article. Swedish NATO contingent of IFOR peacekeeping multinational forces in Bosnia. But, and symbolically, like that. It was NATO, in the end, that replaced the UN in the Former Yugoslavia. Technically so.

      Peacekeeping mission only under the auspices of the UN. This, of course, is all great, but ... what is the end result of this mission? Or, the main thing is to begin to legally gain a foothold? So, this already happened, remember. In the Former Yugoslavia.
      UN peacekeeping forces, allegedly, could not cope with the task, incurring losses, did not possess sufficient military force. And, NATO, instead of dissolving, stated that the UN is not able to extinguish the conflict, and only NATO, with its potential, is capable of this. As a result: the UN has been discredited, since 1995 the new peacekeeping mission has already been sponsored by NATO. The new hypostasis, so to speak, does not need to dissolve after the ATS.
      The NATO methods were effective at that time, then Russia had little to do, except for its participation, which came to naught in 2003.
      Now a similar scenario is being seen ... The UNMC will enter, and it is not known who will gain a foothold there.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 19 February 2018 08: 41
        +3
        I trust Old Man in this matter, more than many others ... and his military contingent is VERY QUALITY !!!
    4. ancestors from Don
      ancestors from Don 19 February 2018 07: 58
      +9
      If you put peacekeepers, then on the administrative border along the line of 2014 that divided the LPR and the DPR with Ukraine. Everything else is wanted by Parashenkovites.
      1. vtnsk
        vtnsk 19 February 2018 08: 31
        +1
        And in another way they won’t even be allowed to enter ... hi
        1. Jack
          Jack 19 February 2018 10: 50
          +2
          For vtnsk. To yours: "... And in another way they won’t even be allowed to go in there .." ******************************* **********8
          Putin agrees to more: http://www.ntv.ru/novosti/1926981/
      2. rocket757
        rocket757 19 February 2018 08: 38
        +2
        A sluggish war, for wear and tear, an ugly business, yet deadly!
        It’s better that peacekeepers take control of the situation, only sober on garlic!
        In the end, they’ll agree, but not ours, but Old Man with Finns, is it really bad to guess in advance?
        1. sib.ataman
          sib.ataman 19 February 2018 10: 37
          +1
          I finally wonder where you have seen something in our time on garlic? Yes, and in the old days, too!
      3. helmi8
        helmi8 19 February 2018 15: 50
        0
        Quote: ancestors from the Don
        If you put peacekeepers, then on the administrative border along the line of 2014 that divided the LPR and the DPR with Ukraine. Everything else is wanted by Parashenkovites.

        Yeah ... And so that they stood facing Ukraine ... And just that - immediately into a tambourine.
    5. vtnsk
      vtnsk 19 February 2018 08: 28
      +2
      Here is someone, but Belarusians are definitely not needed there. They will sell everyone and everything ... laughing
      1. sib.ataman
        sib.ataman 19 February 2018 10: 39
        +3
        Apart from Russia, there should not be anyone there at all! Everyone else is from the evil one!
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 19 February 2018 11: 14
          +1
          Are there many options now?
          To fight or compromise?
          New Russia does not give up on any, a protracted conflict will not cancel it, but peacekeepers in theory can save people from slow extermination. It would be better if no one decided otherwise.
          There are fundamental questions on the topic of peacekeepers, we will see them. According to any authorities of the republics can influence this process.
          All this, of course, ideally, such as garlic, so we'll see.
          We can’t change anything with our statements, really like that!
        2. Pax tecum
          Pax tecum 19 February 2018 12: 56
          +2
          ... In addition to Russia, there should not be anyone there at all! Everyone else is from the evil one!

          These words from comrade sib.ataman reflect the truth.
          As soon as the UN troops (multinational peacekeeping forces) enter, they begin to gain a foothold, West 100% will begin to expand the mission, both numerically and in directions.
          That is, in other words, with the introduction of the UN MS, Russia loses in the territory of its historical influence (essentially its lands), space for political and military maneuver, and greatly reduces the sphere of influence.
          It is necessary to show the whole world, to let “partners” know that ONE SLAVIC PEOPLE (Great Russians, Belarusians, Little Russians) are able to cope with any problem at home.
          No need for Western degenerates at all! Let there be only Belarusians, under the UN flag, if Russia "cannot" participate.
          As already got this "junction" of the Kremlin capitalists before the Western capitalists! And everyone strives to rationally justify their failures before the Russians, such as their helplessness and incompetence.
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 19 February 2018 14: 19
            +2
            Such is our power. The international imperialist international is, in fact.
            It was necessary to do the option of peacekeepers from Russia at once, after a fight, waving it was pointless.
            Who will take the liberty of doing everything in the interests of the simple Russian world, the Russian man. Such people are not visible in the future, but the extermination of the people of New Russia had to be stopped yesterday!
            The question is how? And this is a question for all of us, we can’t hope for our authorities, they won’t do it.
            1. bane's jacket
              bane's jacket 19 February 2018 14: 23
              +1
              Quote: rocket757
              Such is our power.
              Who will take the liberty of doing everything in the interests of the simple Russian world, the Russian man. Such people are not visible in the future, but the extermination of the people of New Russia had to be stopped yesterday!

              And what about Putin?
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 19 February 2018 14: 58
                +2
                Very correct question!
                A simple answer like that.
                Do not I admire him ???
                I am a man of the Country of Soviets and the current rulers, in fact, cannot be mine, I just live at such a time, in such a country. She did not stop my homeland, only from a call - For faith, the tsar and the Fatherland, I have and will always be only the Fatherland!
                1. bane's jacket
                  bane's jacket 19 February 2018 15: 08
                  0
                  Quote: rocket757
                  Very correct question!
                  A simple answer like that.
                  Do not I admire him ???
                  I am a man of the Country of Soviets and the current rulers, in fact, cannot be mine, I just live at such a time, in such a country. She did not stop my homeland, only from a call - For faith, the tsar and the Fatherland, I have and will always be only the Fatherland!

                  It’s just incomprehensible to the mind, how does everything get on with you here, this lies interspersed with pathos?
                  From what appeal
                  For faith, the king and the Fatherland,

                  do you have something left? You damn it, in Soviet times, stumble about a similar slogan - at least you would fly out of work, or even go to a psychiatric hospital for examination and compulsory treatment.
                  You still with the same pathos (and capslock) tell everyone here how you believed in God in Soviet times. You are all here about some kind of mythical “liberals” preventing you from constantly trying, but if you scooped you up for the “presence of absence” of these same “liberals” you would quickly capitalize on such speeches.
                  So less pathos and lies.
                  1. rocket757
                    rocket757 19 February 2018 16: 09
                    +1
                    What did I say when I was a believer?
                    It was necessary to write - For the Motherland, for Stalin? in fact, it’s the same appeal - For Faith, Tsar and Fatherland ... attitude to their country, this can not change?
                    Many, since the time elapsed since the collapse of the Land of the Soviets, managed to repaint more than once, who got into faith, who else where. I don’t change color, I didn’t swear the oath, and that’s the whole point ... but who, what did they fantasize about ... punitive psychiatry came here ... but is there something to say on the topic or OBS again? Shaw there still dragged for the liberals? By the way, this trifle does not interest me, by definition, I do not like raccoon viper, but nothing more.
                    The country has only one real enemy, this is a system that is the power of the capitalists, everything else liberals, dermocrats and other things have a free application to the system, nothing more.
                    PS I won’t call for Stalin either, a complicated, controversial topic ...
                    1. bane's jacket
                      bane's jacket 19 February 2018 16: 24
                      +1
                      Quote: rocket757

                      The country has only one real enemy, it is a system that is the power of the capitalists,

                      Damn, yes you save up money and already go at least once to the same Finland, Denmark, Norway ... In the same Czech Republic, at least go where the capitalists are in power ... fool
                      1. rocket757
                        rocket757 19 February 2018 18: 48
                        +2
                        In the first was.
                        Secondly, WHY, Schaub see the same with us, the same thing, only in a more wild form, because our fat belly greedy redneck!
                        Thirdly, such a simple question - How many decades did the foreign proletariat fight for their rights, for their current well-being, and why did the capitalists make real concessions to the working class from a very specific time and at the same time in all countries ???
                        And now the second question - Why in some of the most correct countries went on the attack on the previous achievements of the working people?
                        There is no answer to these simple questions, why discuss further?
                        PS The most important thing is that she is alone, once and for all ... but where is it sweeter to feed at? place of residence, for example, and more, but where is it sweeter than you are generally waiting for ???
  2. Herculesic
    Herculesic 19 February 2018 07: 04
    +11
    I propose to send the Chinese and North Koreans there! They are tough, they will quickly put them in their place, disarm them, they will take all the weapons and ammunition for themselves, and the North Koreans at the same time and normally feed there!
    1. alex-cn
      alex-cn 19 February 2018 07: 11
      +6
      As for the Chinese, it’s a dark matter, they are on their own ... but they don’t need any APU weapons, except for scrap, and it’s far away.
      1. Herculesic
        Herculesic 19 February 2018 07: 22
        0
        They will recycle them on the spot, and they will also profitably sell the scrap to Ukrainians!
    2. Xnumx vis
      Xnumx vis 19 February 2018 08: 18
      +3
      Quote: Herkulesich
      I propose to send the Chinese and North Koreans there!

      Direct specifically to Svidomo Ukraine! To disperse the Maidan to the damn grandmother. Natsikov to collect and send for re-education to the construction of the national economy in North Korea! Only such an option!
    3. Piramidon
      Piramidon 19 February 2018 09: 45
      +1
      Quote: Herkulesich
      I propose to send the Chinese and North Koreans there! They are tough, they will quickly put them in their place, disarm them, they will take all the weapons and ammunition for themselves, and the North Koreans at the same time and normally feed there!

      All discuss only the question of who to send there, and the opinion of LDNR does not interest anyone.
  3. XII Legion
    XII Legion 19 February 2018 07: 08
    +15
    And after benevolent hints of the Russian Federation
  4. samarin1969
    samarin1969 19 February 2018 07: 10
    +4
    Judging by the announcements of the “peacekeeping mission”, Belarusians will not play the “first violin”. Yesterday, Lukashenko warned "all parties" that his case in the Donbass is "neutrality."
    ps "Storm" is getting closer ...
    1. Pax tecum
      Pax tecum 19 February 2018 07: 42
      +7
      It is not exclusive that they will repeat "The Tempest" / "Oluja". In the end, Russia will not attack the peacekeepers, under the cover of which this can happen. Or, hell knows what kind of information cover they will come up with there.
      Igor Strelkov was right, oh, how right he was when he talked about missed opportunities in 2014.
      Or is this the Kremlin’s plan to freeze the conflict? ..
      1. vtnsk
        vtnsk 19 February 2018 08: 33
        0
        Russia will do what it sees fit. And the "peacekeepers" there or someone else - sideways ... yes
        1. Pax tecum
          Pax tecum 19 February 2018 09: 05
          +4
          Russia will do what it considers necessary

          Let's be realistic and replace the word "Russia" in your proposal with the word "Anti-Russian power in the Kremlin", in the context of this topic.
          And, for an attack on peacekeepers with a UN mandate, there will be a response, for this is a real excuse. Remember 08.08.08, how we reacted, and then, not with the "best" leader of the country, to the death of their peacekeepers.
      2. vasya.pupkin
        vasya.pupkin 19 February 2018 12: 55
        +2
        Quote: Pax tecum
        It is not exclusive that they will repeat "The Tempest" / "Oluja". In the end, Russia will not attack the peacekeepers, under the cover of which this can happen. Or, hell knows what kind of information cover they will come up with there.
        Igor Strelkov was right, oh, how right he was when he talked about missed opportunities in 2014.
        Or is this the Kremlin’s plan to freeze the conflict? ..

        Do not wake Surkov's fake guns, they will soon begin dumping their dung national hero of NEW RUSSIA for their 30 silver-in, Judas.
      3. Pax tecum
        Pax tecum 19 February 2018 13: 09
        +2
        And by the way! The Storm operation to eliminate the Republika Srpska Krajina in 1995, carried out by Muslim-Croat forces with the support of American PMCs and American / NATO bombing of Bosnian Serb positions throughout Bosnia, just at the time when the warring republics of the Former Yugoslavia were “stuffed” with peacekeepers UN. Did not help. The national entity that lasted 4 of the year was physically eliminated.
  5. Alexey N
    Alexey N 19 February 2018 07: 11
    +1
    From the Belarusian Autonomous Region? Why not.
    Kazakhstan still has a couple to China.
  6. svp67
    svp67 19 February 2018 07: 12
    +1
    In particular, it became known about the readiness to deploy peacekeeping missions in the Donbass from Belarus and Finland.
    + Sweden, has already expressed its willingness to provide its contingent
    1. vtnsk
      vtnsk 19 February 2018 08: 34
      +2
      Only there were not enough of them. NATO countries in the Donbass have nothing to do! ... stop
      1. svp67
        svp67 19 February 2018 08: 38
        +3
        Quote: vtnsk
        NATO countries in the Donbass have nothing to do !.

        And who from this list:
        - Finland
        - Belarus
        - Sweden
        NATO country?
  7. Dormidont
    Dormidont 19 February 2018 07: 19
    +10
    Finnish peacekeepers have vast experience in blockading Russian cities
    1. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 19 February 2018 07: 27
      +7
      Quote: Dormidont
      Finnish peacekeepers have vast experience in blockading Russian cities

      The same Mannerheim, which in Leningrad hung a board .....
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 19 February 2018 07: 30
    +5
    Another specific decision has not been made, because there are disagreements where and how, and those who want to consolidate their name in history as the "main peacekeeper" are already lining up. If I am not mistaken, then Poroshenko is not eager for Belarus to participate in this mission.
    1. vtnsk
      vtnsk 19 February 2018 08: 35
      0
      Poroshenko actually ask and will not. And so everyone knows his "Wishlist" ... laughing
  9. Turkestan
    Turkestan 19 February 2018 07: 33
    +8
    Before posting PEACEKEEPERS, it would not hurt to get an opinion on this from the people of DONBASS. And then it already seems that in the quiet all decided everything and there is a political and psychological treatment of the population. LETTERS OF THE LORD IS SMUKING,
    1. vtnsk
      vtnsk 19 February 2018 08: 38
      +2
      The people of Donbass want two things:
      1. To stop shelling of their territory from the side occupied by the APU
      2. So that none of the supporters of the Kiev Nazis set foot on their territory ...
      Point!... good
      1. BARKHAN
        BARKHAN 19 February 2018 16: 09
        +2
        Quote: vtnsk
        The people of Donbass want two things:
        1. To stop shelling of their territory from the side occupied by the APU
        2. So that none of the supporters of the Kiev Nazis set foot on their territory ...
        Point!... good

        Whoever, whatever they say ... my personal opinion is that any peacekeepers other than Russians are drains. And Bandera people don’t even hide that they want to repeat the Croatian scenario. “Minsky” is a hoax and drains. Bandera people don’t hide that “Minsk "they were saved from defeat and given them time to create an army. To give Bandera people 4 years to create a combat-ready amy is betrayal. Recognizing the results of a coup is stupidity and betrayal. Economic assistance to the enemy is stupidity and betrayal.
        Let's go back to 2014-2015 ... What did they write on the site? And what happened in the ending? The Ukrainian army should be disarmed and dispersed. Or maybe someone will have doubts that a civil war will begin in Russia after the discharge of LDNR? A Bandera will already wool in our cities.
        Maybe I'm wrong. But so far I see it. The pro-Russian population and just the Russians are trying to shove Bandera. If I'm wrong, please tell me what the phrase of our authorities means “Donetsk and Lugansk are an integral part of Ukraine? Yes, any of the points” Minsk "is a drain.
  10. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 19 February 2018 08: 02
    +4
    Belarus and the United States will not work for Belarus. They will be accused of conspiring with Russia. If the Finns will be on the line of contact - let them become, but this also does not correspond to the interests of the USA and the authorities. Finns are not needed at the border with Russia, they will not receive a mandate from the UN Security Council for this, and it is unlikely that they themselves will be drawn into the explicit provocation of ukrofascist power, even under the patronage of the United States. This is a region in which Russia (USSR) has always dominated, these are the original Russian lands. Finland takes this into account, even if it is politically correct, and will not get into a direct conflict with us.
  11. BAI
    BAI 19 February 2018 08: 43
    0
    In any case, there should not be representatives of countries that supported the sanctions against Russia.
    1. Jack
      Jack 19 February 2018 10: 59
      +1
      Unfortunately, the Russian population will not be asked about this!
      And under the current government in Russia, NATO in Ukraine is only a matter of time ...
  12. NordUral
    NordUral 19 February 2018 08: 48
    0
    Calm down guys. And sit at home, do not lose your conscience.
  13. Sudoplatov
    Sudoplatov 19 February 2018 11: 01
    +2
    Swedes, Finns and potato decided to legalize their mercenaries from the side of dill, there will be no other chance, and so the court and the tower