Military Review

Senator: Washington does not have a "preventive policy" against Pyongyang

46
The development of the situation on the Korean Peninsula depends on North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-un, but the White House does not consider a “preventive policy” in relation to Pyongyang, reports RIA News Statement by Senate Foreign Affairs Committee member James Rich.




The situation we are facing now on the Korean Peninsula is indeed very dangerous. I would say that now there is no more dangerous place on the planet than on the Korean Peninsula. And everything is in the hands and mind of one person - Kim Jong-un. What he does, what he decides to do, will determine how the situation will develop. And it will not be resolved well, if it continues to follow the course it is taking now
Riesch said at the Munich Security Conference.

The US President said, and he is committed to this, that Kim Jong-un would not be able to get a ballistic program and means of delivering nuclear weapons. weaponswith which he can strike at the United States. He stated this very clearly, and all those who doubt that the president is committed to this, live in a parallel reality. And the consequences of this will be truly catastrophic. But there is no such thing as "preventive policy", it appeared in the media,
explained the parliamentarian.

According to him, the US administration has never considered such a strategy for Pyongyang.

There is no such thing, and this is logical, because if you think about what it can lead to, if this happens, it will probably be one of the worst disasters in stories humanity
concluded Rish.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey K
    Andrey K 18 February 2018 13: 36
    +7
    James Rish:
    ... Washington does not have a “preventive policy” regarding Pyongyang ...

    Washington, in general, has no politics - continuous ambitions, with a claim to "exclusivity" ...
    1. Logall
      Logall 18 February 2018 13: 40
      +4
      But in relation to their own minds, a "preventive" procedure has long been carried out!
      1. Andrey K
        Andrey K 18 February 2018 13: 42
        +6
        Quote: Logall
        ... But in relation to their own minds, a "preventive" procedure has long been carried out! ...

        The "procedure" with the mind went catastrophically - there is no mind left request
      2. Herculesic
        Herculesic 18 February 2018 13: 44
        +1
        Alexander hi -it’s impossible, due to the complete lack of reason! hi There are only aggressive animal instincts! !! am
        1. Ased
          Ased 18 February 2018 14: 00
          +3
          “The US president said, and he is committed to this, that Kim Jong-un will not be able to get a ballistic program and means of delivery of nuclear weapons with which he can strike at the United States.

          Excuse me, haven't Kim got it yet? In my opinion, he clearly showed no
          "means" he has. Otherwise, what would the states yell like that?
  2. rruvim
    rruvim 18 February 2018 13: 40
    +2
    Why are Kremlinologists, or now Kimeveda think that Kim Jong-un is something of himself. He is not his legendary grandfather. Japan is categorically opposed to the unification of the two Koreas, and China is categorically opposed to the unification. It is clear that the unification will take place on finances and under the auspices of South Korea, but after it there will be no place for either the Americans or the Japanese. One China will win from the unification, but also Russia.
    1. KVU-NSVD
      KVU-NSVD 18 February 2018 13: 53
      +5
      I agree in everything, except that Eun is nothing of himself. His ability at such a young age to retain power in the apparatus struggle and a clear course regarding the ongoing crisis, in my opinion, speaks of him as a strong man and leader.
      Quote: rruvim
      Why are Kremlinologists, or now Kimeveda think that Kim Jong-un is something of himself. He is not his legendary grandfather. Japan is categorically opposed to the unification of the two Koreas, and China is categorically opposed to the unification. It is clear that the unification will take place on finances and under the auspices of South Korea, but after it there will be no place for either the Americans or the Japanese. One China will win from the unification, but also Russia.
      1. rruvim
        rruvim 18 February 2018 14: 05
        +1
        Strongly disagree! Not Kim Jong-un needs generals, generals need Kim Jong-un. Purely eastern truth. Watch the movie Shadow of a Warrior by Kurosawa. Now there is a backstage bargain between members of the Politburo of the Workers' Party on the one hand and the Chinese and South Koreans on the other. Why are Americans and nervous. The arrival of a bunch of North Korean officials and “Chekists” in Pyeongchang was a complete surprise for the p-owls. Even more unexpected was their county (or departure) throughout the country. The reason for the Olympics was for South Korean officials to meet directly with their North Korean brothers, without the "custody" and supervision of the United States and Japan.
        1. KVU-NSVD
          KVU-NSVD 18 February 2018 14: 21
          +5
          Not Kim Jong-un needs generals, generals need Kim Jong-un.
          Maybe you are right ... or maybe not, everything is probably intertwined there. I still think that after the death of his father, Eun was unlikely to be able to maintain power without leadership qualities. There were an abundance of those wishing to reign or change the clan in power in the top elite. And the fact that a delegation from Pyongyang came to the Olympics and unknown contacts with unknown results infuriate the United States is a fact. And I also think of Un's merit as a good political chess player .. hi I’ll definitely download and watch the film, although I’m not a fan of Japanese cinema ..
          1. rruvim
            rruvim 18 February 2018 14: 29
            0
            He does not pull on the "chess player". Even if the “uncles” in uniform say “go horse”, he will not be able to “soap the face” with a chessboard. They dig up so much dirt (bourgeois) about him that publish it in Maxim magazine, no one would give him a hand. There is always a litmus test for the Juche system. It is enough to see how his grandfather applauded, and how now they applaud him.
            1. KVU-NSVD
              KVU-NSVD 18 February 2018 14: 38
              +4
              . They dig up so much dirt (bourgeois) about him that publish it in Maxim magazine, no one would give him a hand.
              Yes, they can now dig a wagon and a small cart on every leader. Yes, and foreign media out there read a few to put it mildly, and they won’t tarnish Un’s reputation within the country, but they will turn a blind eye abroad if necessary. Applauding, as usual, on a schedule ... Although it is such a closed country that we can only speculate on what is there and how ...
              1. rruvim
                rruvim 18 February 2018 14: 55
                0
                This is not my observation (regarding the applause). This is the observation of a North Korean graduate student: to my question, "how do you now applaud Eunu in comparison with Ira?" He answered without accent: "It's a little ..." smile
          2. rruvim
            rruvim 19 February 2018 18: 05
            0
            Take a look! I am not a special fan of Kurosawa, but he became practically an outcast in his homeland after this film. There is a conspiracy theological concept, actively supported by some Chinese historical schools that the Japanese created with robots, not in terms of modern technologies, of course, but in terms of Chinese metaphysics. Then they got rid of them, overpowered on the Japanese islands to the Ainu, which were considered heretics. So Kurosawa tried in the film "Shadow of a Warrior" to prove that not all Japanese are robots. But he did exactly the opposite ...
  3. ancestors from Don
    ancestors from Don 18 February 2018 13: 41
    +2
    Eun is really handsome, he has not bent one millimeter, I respect such politicians.
  4. Herculesic
    Herculesic 18 February 2018 13: 42
    0
    Do you drive aircraft carriers to the shores of North Korea solely to wind tens of thousands of miles "on the speedometer" for fun? ?? fool
    1. Wolka
      Wolka 18 February 2018 17: 37
      0
      type train, but master the budget with enviable tenacity ...
  5. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 18 February 2018 13: 43
    +6
    The US president said, and he is committed to, that Kim Jong-un will not be able to get a ballistic program and means of delivery of nuclear weapons with which he can strike at the United States.
    Already received . Therefore, the return line in the issue of a preventive strike is included
    the White House does not consider a “preventive policy” regarding Pyongyang,
    .
  6. Egorovich
    Egorovich 18 February 2018 13: 43
    +4
    Mattress makers are more intimidating with such statements, and ON has deliberately turned the DPRK into a country with nuclear weapons without asking anyone for permission. Well done, and nothing more! yes
  7. rruvim
    rruvim 18 February 2018 13: 48
    +1
    The main task of China and Russia to unite the two Koreas, no matter on what terms. Any peaceful decision by the alliance will invalidate the presence of American troops on the Korean peninsula. Therefore, the demonization of the DPRK leadership, in fact, their latent support by the Americans, is beneficial only to the p-s himself. They will never allow the unification of the two Koreas, even under the leadership of Seoul. United Germany and like a bone in the throat. And for the Japanese - a united Korea, in general, a nightmare.
    1. LiSiCyn
      LiSiCyn 18 February 2018 14: 07
      +1
      Quote: rruvim
      The main task of China and Russia to unite the two Koreas,

      Do you think this is real ???
      On what conditions is unification possible ?? Kim will give up power, just like that ...? To turn from almost a "deity" into a citizen of Ob. Korea ...
      Or "southerners," put him secretary general?
      1. rruvim
        rruvim 18 February 2018 14: 19
        +2
        There are two options for combining:
        One Chinese - “one batch-two systems”, this suits both the Politburo of the Workers Party of the DPRK and South Korean business, but does not suit the Americans, especially the Japanese;
        The second American is to provoke a war or a color revolution, where the Americans will once again prove themselves to be the savior of free Koreans, but only the Chinese are against this option, but the South Koreans themselves and now the Americans.
        Because the Americans have chosen the third path: NEVER prevent the unification of the two Koreas. A couple of North Korean generals bought by the CIA, who will release a dozen shells in Seoul, will be enough to bury the idea of ​​unification for a dozen years.
        1. ML-334
          ML-334 18 February 2018 15: 38
          0
          Why does the dead man need money? Lucky, if one leaves, but most likely grabs relatives.
          1. rruvim
            rruvim 18 February 2018 15: 43
            0
            You do not know the number of defectors from the North. There are not only generals, there the relatives of a large Kim family come across. One was even soaked at the Airport ...
        2. LiSiCyn
          LiSiCyn 18 February 2018 16: 02
          +1
          Quote: rruvim
          One Chinese - "one batch, two systems"

          Do you think the people of South Korea are ready to accept a communist ideology? Have you ever watched a TV show from Yu.K.? It seems that they are competing with the Yaps, who is more obscene ...
          Mattresses made a cool brothel from South Korea and Japan ...
          I can not imagine the unification of the "Koreans" in the near future. Under no circumstances ... Perhaps only an improvement in relationships.
          1. rruvim
            rruvim 18 February 2018 16: 28
            +2
            And could you imagine in 1989 the unification of two Germanys? Or the division of Czechoslovakia into the Czech Republic and Slovakia? Everything is decided quickly ... 21st century, after all ...
            1. LiSiCyn
              LiSiCyn 18 February 2018 17: 03
              +1
              Quote: rruvim
              the unification of two Germany

              44 years have passed, in fact, much less ...
              52g - 2017, 65 years old ... The generation has changed, almost ...
              In addition, you do not confuse, the soft socialism of the GDR, the end of the 80s ...
              And a tough totalitarian regime with a communist ideology ...

              Quote: rruvim
              division of Czechoslovakia

              Namely, the division ...
              The increase in economy. ties, cultural, the weakening of the borders. mode .. Maybe.
              Unification, in the short term, never ...
              And if you are interested in my answer? You, somehow, let me know ... wink
              1. rruvim
                rruvim 18 February 2018 17: 32
                +1
                The division of Czechoslovakia into two States was meaningless in the NORMAL sense, because they immediately united within the EU, only with their supposedly independent parliaments and presidents. Combining the two Koreas is simple. Remove from the political map of the world only two States - America and Japan. And that’s it! They are against unification. China and Russia are able to do this. We and China have a lot of experience. China destroyed the Communist Party, but retained the Party, Russia destroyed the Party, but retained the Federation. The Soviet Union does not count, this Golem and so for 72 years, "hit". The golem no longer lives. Knowledgeable Jews will understand me ...
                1. dSK
                  dSK 19 February 2018 04: 36
                  0
                  Quote: rruvim
                  will understand ...
                  by the nature of the speech and knowledge of the Torah, you are a Roman from the “Russian” Jews (or your ancestors), according to the ideology from the “Sadducees” - they do not recognize heaven or hell. "Sadducees who say there is no resurrection"(Math 22: 23)
                  "Zadok as if he understood the words of the teacher in the sense that no reward awaits a person behind the grave and that, therefore, a person should only care about his earthly well-being, as the Sadducees did. "(Wikipedia)
                  1. rruvim
                    rruvim 19 February 2018 15: 39
                    +1
                    I am an Orthodox Christian and believe in the Resurrection. But for the whole of humanity, the global dictates of the Sadducees are more important than the Pharisees. The latter are prone to mysticism, and are ready to destroy all of humanity in order to meet with Moshiach.
                    1. dSK
                      dSK 19 February 2018 17: 53
                      0
                      Hello Roman! I apologize for the previous post. Prof. Alexey Ilyich Osipov, a theologian, told Soyuz TV that at interreligious meetings he had asked the “natural” Pharisees about their relationship with the “Sadducees”, the answer was that the Sadducees “worked” for Great Idea.
                      These two “hands” work constantly and systematically.
                      1. rruvim
                        rruvim 19 February 2018 18: 28
                        +1
                        Refers to prof. Osipov can be different. If the ROC had a structure like the Holy Inquisition, then the professor of the Academy would be the first client. Sadducees "work" for the Great Idea. Exactly! Far "no need to go." Listen to all the speeches of Donald trump! Typical Sadducee. "The role of America. The greatness of the nation. Responsibility to humanity. Our mission. Etc. etc.". But this applies to matter and the Earth. In Russian: "we want to terraform Mars so that human beings live there." The Sadducees do not have metaphysics, they are absolute atheists in the “soul”. Although it is, in a sense, also Vera. The Pharisees are mystics, as if fanatics of making mankind happy through various sufferings or vice versa with all sorts of know-how. But unlike the Sadducees, they believe in Moshiach (the Future) and will do everything for his "meeting." For the Pharisees, the ritual, the occult (cabalistic) process, the signs and events that are associated with the Signs are important. Naturally fanatical faith in all this Demonism. This was already when they (not the Sadducees, they “abstained”) gave to the crucifixion of the common God. Now the party has come to power in the USA, part of the Republicans, namely the Sadducees-technocrats.
                2. dSK
                  dSK 19 February 2018 18: 14
                  0
                  Quote: rruvim
                  then united in the framework of the EU, only with their allegedly independent parliaments and presidents.
                  Keyword allegedly. Christian Europe is ruled by the Judeo-Masons. "Divide and rule" - as old as the world. Ukraine also expects a division into "sovereign" states. Russia is still very, very soon will not restore the updated "union" within the borders of the USSR. Small countries have no chance of maintaining their "real" independence, especially in Europe.
                  1. rruvim
                    rruvim 19 February 2018 18: 55
                    0
                    Yes, no one needs independence! I assure you 80% of the citizens there of any eastern new States in the Sepulcher saw independence. The main thing is that they would give a hawk. Independence is needed only by systematizing nations. The saddest thing is that they are becoming less and less (example: the complete loss of self-consciousness among Germans). On the other hand, new ones appear. Obviously the Poles! Obviously the Catalans! Explicitly Greeks! (After their EU “let down” them there simply was a renaissance of Greek nationalism), now also the Turks. I think give an impulse, and the Serbs will come to Myself. All of them, in different versions, require independence. And the parliaments and presidents of the EU country are just fictitious (a tribute to democratic procedures). Two-thirds (in number) of countries admitted to the EU, these democratic procedures began only after 1991. Great, damn it, experience!
  8. Dormidont
    Dormidont 18 February 2018 14: 01
    +2
    Pyongyang does not need to get the technology of ballistic delivery of nuclear weapons. He has his own
  9. bald
    bald 18 February 2018 14: 22
    +1
    Oh, how did Trump say, but did he visit the arsenals and research institutes of the DPRK? They worry about the threat, do not touch them and you will not be touched. They feel that there is a force that can give change.
  10. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 18 February 2018 14: 25
    0
    The US president said, and he is committed to, that Kim Jong-un will not be able to get a ballistic program and means of delivery of nuclear weapons with which he can strike at the United States. He stated this very clearly.

    Well done Trump! Do not touch us and we will not touch anyone .. AND ALL POLICY!
    And the DPRK has been proposing this for a long time, that's how nuclear weapons were acquired, then they immediately respected Eun ..))))
    And rockets, if that’s not a problem .. ..
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 18 February 2018 14: 42
      0
      Yes, North Korea will not “bullet” anyone, if the Americans themselves do not want to. And the production technologies of "nuclear" technologies themselves were prompted by the Americans themselves, not at the time of Un, but at the time of his father, in order to keep Japan and South Korea at bay. And “throwing up” nuclear technology is a common post-war practice. The Americans are in France and England, We are in China and India, the Americans are in Pakistan, Pakistan is with the Americans in Israel, Israel is South Africa and Brazil (although the latter refused). And someone transferred technology to North Korea. The Chinese and Russia couldn’t give a neighbor a worse gun. The Japanese could not in principle. There were only Pakistanis and the same Americans. I would not be surprised that for the sake of keeping in check (including military bases), the Americans passed on the "secret" of nuclear weapons to Un's father.
  11. borys
    borys 18 February 2018 14: 31
    0
    The fact that the unification of Korea is not beneficial to Japan and the United States is clear to everyone. But today's Russia is also not very interested in this. So is China. United Korea was interesting to the Soviet Union, moreover, socialist.

    1. rruvim
      rruvim 18 February 2018 15: 30
      0
      There can be no socialism in Asia. Another mentality. Socialism can be in Norway, Sweden or Denmark. And in the DPRK there is no socialism, there is feudalism on other conditions. This is neither bad nor good. This is Asia. If you do not "plant" socialism in Afghanistan, you do not "plant" it in Korea, even in North, even in South. I mean classical socialism, described by Marx and Engels. Therefore, the Chinese were the first to "hear" after the consequences of the "cultural revolution", and as if the PRC and the CCP did not call names, this is a typical way of capitalism, passing into its highest form - Imperialism.
  12. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 18 February 2018 15: 56
    0
    "Senator: Washington has no" preventive policy "regarding Pyongyang."
    Nonsense-I-I! AUG maneuvers, flights of strategists, missile defense at the border, pumping in the media - testify.
  13. Old26
    Old26 18 February 2018 16: 42
    0
    Quote: rruvim
    The main task of China and Russia to unite the two Koreas.

    This is of course the maximum program, but it is not especially for Russia the main task. I think that China will think a lot too. Does he need it or not

    Quote: rruvim
    no matter what conditions.

    This is just the most important thing. Who will be "at the head" is the Una group, or some of the South Korean groups.

    Quote: rruvim
    Any peaceful decision by the union will invalidate the presence of American troops on the Korean peninsula ..

    Exactly. And this contradicts your previous thesis that "it does not matter under what conditions." If unification takes place under the auspices of TPK and Un, then legitimacy will be immediately lost. And if under the auspices of the South? What hinders a united Korea, led by southerners, to conclude a new agreement with the Americans?

    Quote: rruvim
    They will never allow the unification of the two Koreas, even under the leadership of Seoul. United Germany and like a bone in the throat. And for the Japanese - a united Korea, in general, a nightmare.

    Well, do not promise. A united Germany is now a member of NATO, although Gorbi and his Politburo were asleep and saw "non-aligned" Germany. A united Korea - it certainly will be worse than a united Germany. bloodless unification will not happen either. Especially if there will be a union under the auspices of the West. Among the North Koreans there are many fanatics who will fight for the leader who is already absent ... United Korea will turn into a boiling pot for a long time
    Unification under the auspices of the North will not be accepted by southerners. So only two options are visible. Or under the auspices of the South and possibly a long period of skirmishes or on some common basis. But not under the auspices of the north. And I'm afraid that this will not happen in our century

    Quote: rruvim
    Yes, North Korea will not “bullet” anyone, if the Americans themselves do not want to. And the production technologies of "nuclear" technologies themselves were prompted by the Americans themselves, not at the time of Un, but at the time of his father, in order to keep Japan and South Korea at bay.

    And where did such sacred knowledge come from? So tens of thousands of North Korean students studying in the USSR and hundreds of thousands studying in China precisely on such critical topics are nothing. And all the Americans threw. Already something and in such they can not be suspected. "Throwing" the technology of nuclear weapons production to the enemy - this is just what you need to think of. It’s all the same that in order for us to unite in a single state with Belarus, we would have to create a threat and we would give the Baltic States nuclear technology

    Quote: rruvim
    And “throwing up” nuclear technology is a common post-war practice. The Americans are in France and England, We are in China and India, the Americans are in Pakistan, Pakistan is with the Americans in Israel, Israel is South Africa and Brazil (although the latter refused). .

    Conspirology flooded. At least you would stick to the chronology when you start to write that Pakistan and the Americans threw technology to Israel. How many decades has Pakistan that has thrown technology later than Israel acquired nuclear weapons?
    Besides, how simple it is for you: this one threw it to that and that's it

    The Americans of France did not throw up nuclear weapons production technology. She developed them herself, although the "Father" of the French nuclear bomb Bertrand Goldstein participated in the Manhattan project. But the French nuclear program started in October 1945, when the Commissariat for Atomic Energy was created, led by Nobel laureate Frederic Joliot-Curie. Having a mature scientific school (created back in the 1930s) and a good technical base, France was able to resume work on nuclear energy relatively quickly after the end of World War II. The first French heavy water nuclear reactor started operating on December 15, 1948, and by the beginning of 1954 there were already two such reactors. But until the mid-1950s. France’s military and political leadership did not think of creating their own nuclear weapons and relied entirely on the US “nuclear umbrella”. The situation changed dramatically after the fall of 1956 (during the so-called Suez crisis, which led to the war of Great Britain, France and Israel against Egypt), France, along with Great Britain and Israel, was threatened with the use of nuclear weapons, made in a statement by the Chairman of the Council of Ministers USSR N. A. Bulganin, and Washington, according to Paris, did not properly respond to this threat. Having doubts about the US allied guarantees, the French government by the end of 1956 decided to create its own nuclear weapons as an instrument ensuring national security and freeing the country from US guardianship in matters of military security. And you say tossed the Americans to the French

    The same is with England. It was there that work began and a parallel project led by the so-called Maud Commitee
    even worked when, in fact, he was absorbed in a more powerful project - Manhattan. And the British “parted” with the Americans a few months before the end of WW2. And they began to work themselves. "Throw" they did not need anything. They themselves were participants in the project.

    It is more or less likely historically permissible to state that we “threw” the technology to the Chinese. Although, for sure, there were no "tidings" of technology. It’s just that Chinese scientists worked on the nuclear infrastructure of the USSR, and Soviet scientists worked on the creation of China’s nuclear industry.

    Well, the fact that, as you say, the USSR “threw” the technology of India, is not true at all. The origins of the Indian Nuclear Program were England, Canada, and the United States. But not the USSR

    Here is the fact that there were close contacts between Israel and South Africa — here you can agree. Brazil did not stand to Israel sideways. She began her program based on US assistance. When relations with the United States worsened, Germany became the main supplier ....

    So it’s not so simple - “Threw” and all. In order for “thrown” technologies to be implemented in countries, there must be a complete infrastructure of the nuclear industry
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 18 February 2018 18: 02
      0
      Everything is correctly written, especially about De Gaulle France. But the word "planted" I do not "recall." If you draw parallels, then the French built a nuclear reactor near Damascus, and then the Israelis razed it to the ground. The transfer of nuclear technology is a common world practice, and it was not born today.
      Concerning conspiracy theories: this is an exact science, unlike mathematics yes
      [quote] [/ quote] If unification takes place under the auspices of TPK and Un, then legitimacy will be immediately lost. And if under the auspices of the South? What hinders a united Korea, led by southerners, to conclude a new agreement with the Americans?
      The fact of the matter is that only China can be the guarantor of unification.
      1. He was the guarantor and remains along the line of demarcation (38th parallel);
      2. South Koreans will not be able to conclude a new agreement with Amers after unification, this does not even contradict UN resolutions, but a firm agreement between the USSR and Amers in 1945. That is, united Korea ceases to be under the tutelage of the USSR and the USA, because There is no USSR, only one “guardianship” remains.
      3. Seoul after the merger will not agree with the Amers on the "new" custody. This is not even conspiracy thesis. The main buyers of goods from Korea: Europe, Southeast Asia and Africa.
      The main investors are Chinese. They fussed in time. Apart from warships, the P-owls in South Korea have nothing!
  14. Wolka
    Wolka 18 February 2018 17: 39
    +1
    Well, who will punish the impudent (America), that’s the question ...
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 18 February 2018 18: 50
      +1
      Why punish her (America)? She punishes herself every day: Shooting at her citizens, se-with scandals, questions: someone who stole flash drives or electronic correspondence, “were you with Russian hookers or not?”, Hackers of all stripes, disconnecting the people who stay in Komen from life support systems (a very popular show in the USA), etc. etc. And shooting, shooting !!! The worst thing is that they are trying to impress this with the rest of humanity. The most popular series in this "patchwork country", of course, about Zombies ...
  15. Old26
    Old26 18 February 2018 19: 40
    0
    Quote: rruvim
    Everything is correctly written, especially about De Gaulle France. But the word "planted" I do not "recall." If you draw parallels, then the French built a nuclear reactor near Damascus, and then the Israelis razed it to the ground. Nuclear technology transfer, common world practice, and it wasn’t born today

    It all depends on what direction this or that country has chosen. If a "peaceful" atom - then it makes no difference whose reactor it will be. If we are talking about a “military” atom, then the question becomes very slippery on the one hand, and multi-vector on the other. Take the same India.
    The first reactors for nuclear power plants were American. And here are research and heavy water reactors. on which plutonium can be produced were already British and Canadian. The heavy water of India was delivered by the Americans. So think about who stands at the origins of the "toss"

    Quote: rruvim
    The fact of the matter is that only China can be the guarantor of the union.!

    Could have been China. But "who knows him." A few years ago, North Korea was still moving in line with the PRC policy, trying to fulfill all the wishes of the "patron". But with the advent of the Third DPRK, Kim frankly sometimes simply "puts" on the opinion of its northern neighbor

    Quote: rruvim
    1. He was the guarantor and remains along the line of demarcation (38th parallel);

    This requires South Korea to agree to this. Guarantor-guarantor, but in a situation the sign will change. Now, instead of the 20th contingent of the United States, the Chinese will be on the DMZ line. Will the southerners want this situation? Not sure. China could probably, on certain conditions, guarantee that a united Korea would remain neutral. But the introduction of troops even on the dividing line is not an option. There will be no consensus.

    Quote: rruvim
    2. South Koreans will not be able to conclude a new agreement with Amers after unification, this does not even contradict UN resolutions, but a firm agreement between the USSR and Amers in 1945. That is, united Korea ceases to be under the tutelage of the USSR and the USA, because There is no USSR, only one “guardianship” remains.

    The agreement between the USSR and the USA can hardly be considered valid in the absence of one of the guaranteeing parties. Everything will depend primarily on the constitution of a united Korea. there will be a provision that on the territory of the country contingents of friendly countries can be deployed to protect sovereignty - one thing will not be another. And everything will depend on, let’s say, the balance of power “above”.

    Quote: rruvim
    3. Seoul after the merger will not agree with the Amers on the "new" custody. This is not even conspiracy thesis. The main buyers of goods from Korea: Europe, Southeast Asia and Africa.
    The main investors are Chinese. They fussed in time. Apart from warships, the P-owls in South Korea have nothing!

    May God grant that this is so.
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 19 February 2018 15: 43
      0
      I am glad that you still thought about the Constitution of the future united Korea. That means yes!"