Military Review

A step away from the abyss in Munich

54
Our euro-loving political community was agitated by the existential agenda of the Munich Security Conference. Russia, too, Europe! Yes, Russia is part of Europe, that's all. Western Europe, and the West in general, speaks and worries only about its security, only about itself, beloved, and its security is really one step away from the abyss, but not the security of Russia and the non-Western world: their security, and from the West, on the contrary, increases.


A step away from the abyss in Munich


Western Europe doesn’t care about the security of Russia, it would like to dismember Russia with its Eastern Partnership policy directed against Russia and at the expense of Russia, as the late Zbigniew Brzezinski commanded. After all, it was the policy of the “European partnership” that led to a coup in Ukraine and the emergence instead of the “multi-vector Yanukovych”, which this was to the disfavor of Europe, of a Europe-loving Bandera Nazi regime.

Russia repelled a European-American attempt at expansion on its western borders, in the Crimea and Donbas, launched a counter-attack in Syria — and now Europe in Munich shouts: “Chef, usyo is gone!” Yes, the Eastern Partnership’s European policy is gone, and we she was buried, so this European panic does not concern us at all. And since Russia is its real reason, our deadpan Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov enjoys heightened attention and respect in Munich.

The other main question of the Munich Conference is the aggravation of the situation in Syria, where the world war can almost begin. Specifically, Russia and the United States may collide. Yes, it is getting hot in Syria, the United States cannot accept its defeat, and they are fighting there today under a “false flag” on the side of any terrorists. Moreover, this aggravation did not begin under Deir-ez-Zor, where the Wagner squad suffered, but under our VKS base in Hmeimim, when our special forces, probably the same Wagner, destroyed a group of some specials who organized drones attack on the base of the VKS, which led to the death of several Russian soldiers and damage to equipment.

Something suggests that these specialists were Americans, and they all died. After that, the aggravation began, or rather, mutual revenge began. Our Su-25 shot down from MANPADS and the Wagner squad that was fired is the continuation of the attack of drones on Hamim. Now, it seems, our tacitly give an answer in Syria, according to American specialists, of which there are many, so the hysterics in Washington about the aggravation of the situation in Syria began.

We note that Russia does not express any concern about the situation in Syria, it seems that it is just grinding Western allies and advisers in Syria, that is, Washington’s hysteria about the danger of a collision is overdue: they have already encountered Hmeymim. It is reported that pro-American Kurds left positions held at Dair al-Zor.

In general, the entry of Russian videoconferencing system into Syria from the very beginning meant the possibility of a collision with the US Armed Forces, and Russia went for it, because in Ukraine the US and Europe had crossed the "red line", bringing the puppet Bandera regime to power. Vladimir Putin stated bluntly that we would destroy all the targets in Syria that would pose a danger to us, and indeed destroy, and the Americans got worried, came to Munich by a huge military delegation. And from the Russian side, one is Sergey Lavrov, not counting Iskander in Kaliningrad.

In Syria, Russia has shown that it will continue to fight for its own interests: there will be no more retreat, so Europe and America were in Munich a step from the abyss. From our abyss. Russia began to firmly defend its "red lines", but does not scream about it on the air, like Nikita Isaev.

Russia expressed its attitude to the Munich Conference, and in general, to Europe and the USA, in Kaliningrad, having deployed the Iskander missile system there for its opening, this is clearly not a coincidence. And against the background of “Iskander”, some right in TV studios panic: “Minsk” does not work, and they have driven Russia into a corner. ” Yes, the Minsk Agreements are not implemented by Kiev and Europe with America, they are not politically beneficial for them, it is beneficial for them to lie about the guilt of Russia. What follows from this?

Europe will not fulfill other agreements, if it does not fulfill the already signed, Europe, as a satellite of the USA, is not negotiable! That is, new plans, like various "peacekeeping", will not be carried out by Europe and America, they are called upon to bury Minsk, and, in case of success, to deceive Russia. In this situation, it is pointless to conclude new contracts with Europe and the United States, it remains to insist on the already signed “Minsk”, which Sergey Lavrov does in Munich.

Say more, Russia is not interested in the stability and prosperity of the Bandera regime on its borders, this historical enemy that today does not hide its plans to invade Russia with some Western allies. This is a strategic threat to Russia, so it will not move anywhere from the “non-working Minsk,” however, the Bandera regime, aimed at political transformation. “Russia needs a friendly Ukraine,” said Vladimir Putin more than once.

The US and Europe do not want to take into account Russia's concerns, do not stop the policy of undermining Russia's security by creating Russophobic regimes on its borders, so why should Russia be in the position of Europe? Today's “Minsk policy” of Russia is forced, taking into account the confrontation with Europe and America. Russia is gathering strength, and is waiting for the weakening of Europe and the USA.

German political analyst Alexander Rahr said before the conference in Munich that Europe was alarmed by Russia's eastern energy policy with China and not only. A year or two ago, Europe laughed at the “march of Russia to the East,” and today was frightened. Russia is getting an alternative to the European energy market, so Germany wants to have the Nord Stream - 2, in order to guarantee its energy stability.

In general, the situation in the economy raises big questions. Our alarmists, like Nikita Isaeva, shout that the West has driven Russia into a corner with sanctions, and everything is lost, Europe is shouting from the opposite side, that everything is missing from it. Under the weight of economic success, the European Union is falling apart, migrants from Africa and Asia have invaded, and European friends are preparing to impose sanctions against each other. Trumpovskie USA, struck by economic success, require money from Europe for NATO, and investment in the United States. Who is right: Europe or Nikita?

What will Europe do with the Euro-associated Bandera Nazis, from which Poland has already been impressed and passed the anti-Bandera law? By the way, Russia does not put much pressure on Bandera, like Poland, perhaps pushing him to Europe to show his order there.

Nikita, as a former producer of the TV Football Academy, recalls that Russia has been in the corner for four years, that is, under the sanctions of the collective West, with a “torn economy” and other misfortunes that western “experts” and our own Nikita awards . Over the years, Russia, we will repeat, returned the Crimea, defended the Donbass, entered Syria, and overcame the negative effect of Western sanctions, the American special services report specifically for our Nikits. The Russian economy has gone up, in spite of all our "well-wishers." Why?

Historically, Russia has never been as strong as today. The Russian Empire, which is taken as a model for Nikita, bought shells in Europe, because its military-industrial complex was in its infancy, and suffered defeats on the German front in World War I when England did not deliver shells already paid by Russia for artillery. Today, Russia is one of the largest exporters. weapons in the world. The USSR did not conduct a single operation, similar to today's Syrian, even such plans were not, feel the difference.

This is generally a mystery: how does Russia with the economy in 2% of the world manage to resist the USA and the whole West with more than 20%? I do not know where the statistics and the entire economic community lie and how, but common sense insists that they lie somewhere! The military parity of the USA and Russia says that their real economies are comparable. Rivalry on an equal footing in Syria and around the world, in all environments, from underwater depths to space, is impossible with a strong economic gap. But economists and statistics insist on a wonderful miracle: the "country-gas station" is opposed to the world hegemon!

I do not understand how Russia, with the "gas station economy", can successfully withstand the entire collective West. Or there are miracles in the world, and divine providence stands on the side of Russia, or the real resources of Russia and the United States are almost the same, and someone somewhere is cheating on economic analysis and statistics.
Author:
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. siberalt
    siberalt 19 February 2018 07: 04
    +3
    Interestingly, but Isaev somewhere heard of Viktor Kamnev? recourse
    1. Alber
      Alber 19 February 2018 07: 08
      +1
      Quote: siberalt
      Interestingly, but Isaev somewhere heard of Viktor Kamnev? recourse


      One last name "Isaev" is worth ...
      1. siberalt
        siberalt 19 February 2018 07: 11
        +1
        Yeah Yulian Semenov wrote something about Isaev. laughing
      2. Esoteric
        Esoteric 19 February 2018 07: 14
        0
        I still do not understand why there is a European part in Russia? The Americans did not have the brains, perhaps, to declare Europe only that part of Europe where - not Russia ... wassat There would be no precedent.
        1. dSK
          dSK 19 February 2018 09: 07
          +2
          Quote: Victor Kamenev
          Or there are miracles in the world, and divine providence is on the side of Russia,
          the more thunder thunders, the more often a man is baptized.
          1. Stas157
            Stas157 19 February 2018 10: 25
            +5
            . The main issue of the Munich Conference is the aggravation of the situation in Syria, where the world war may almost begin.
            For the war to begin, for this, someone must answer, for the downed planes, for the strike by cruise missiles at Shairat, for the killing of our PMCs ...
            How can a war begin if President Putin has an iron record and prudence? Insolent partners know about this, and therefore untie their hands.
    2. Victor Kamenev
      19 February 2018 17: 00
      0
      And what, Nikita Isaev - "sacred cow"?
  2. 210ox
    210ox 19 February 2018 08: 14
    +4
    “Russia is not interested in the stability and prosperity of the Bandera regime on its borders, this historic enemy of its, and today does not hide plans to invade Russia with any Western allies. This is a strategic threat to Russia, so it will not move anywhere from“ idle Minsk ” however, aimed at the political transformation of the Bandera regime. "Russia needs a friendly Ukraine," Vladimir Putin said more than once. "However, Russian business is fueling this Bandera regime, and the Foreign Ministry is peeping under the impudent antics of Bandera. The left hand does not know what the right hand is doing. Article -.... "and someone somewhere is seriously cheating in economic analysis and statistics." But for this +
    1. Victor Kamenev
      19 February 2018 17: 03
      +1
      I’ll tell you a secret: Russia also incurs losses from the break in relations with Ukraine, therefore it feeds and feeds when there is nowhere to go.
  3. Bastinda
    Bastinda 19 February 2018 08: 19
    +6
    I do not understand how Russia, with the "gas station economy", can successfully withstand the entire collective West. Or there are miracles in the world, and divine providence stands on the side of Russia, or the real resources of Russia and the United States are almost the same, and someone somewhere is cheating on economic analysis and statistics.

    And you go outside, see whose cars are on the road, visit a store (preferably not a grocery), visit a production (almost any).
    And immediately it becomes clear who and where is cheating.
    The USSR did not carry out a single operation similar to today's Syrian, there weren’t even such plans, feel the difference.
    The stupidity of the operation in Syria is quite similar to the participation of the USSR in the Spanish Civil War.
    1. Victor Kamenev
      19 February 2018 17: 06
      +3
      Do you know which stores go to the party officials in the USSR? - under these cries they destroyed the USSR, but they didn’t get mad, now the cars are kissing.
      1. Bastinda
        Bastinda 19 February 2018 17: 40
        0
        It was understood that extremely few goods were produced in Russia. What are you talking about?
        1. S-kerrigan
          S-kerrigan 20 February 2018 06: 00
          +1
          extremely few goods produced in Russia

          Purely for the sake of justice, from an area familiar to me personally close: I like BMW, I am their fan / fan. And even these machines are partially produced in the Russian Federation. Yes, half "screwdriver assembly from car kits" in Kaliningrad. But better than nothing at all.
          About Vesta is also a curious fact: a couple of years ago and today - cars are significantly different, the degree of domestic goods has grown significantly ... and not only in low-tech nodes, now our automatic transmission is also there (it was naturally imported at the start of production).

          Those. Yes, it is in terms of the "initial" our goods are few in the Russian Federation, I agree. But the style of "Chinese Xerox" our quietly quietly also trying to use. Well, even if the company is foreign, but they make the goods here, then still it can already be called
          be produced in Russia
          1. Alber
            Alber 21 February 2018 12: 12
            0
            Quote: S-Kerrigan
            About Vesta is also a curious fact: a couple of years ago and today - cars are significantly different, the degree of domestic goods has grown significantly ... and not only in low-tech nodes, now our automatic transmission is also there (it was naturally imported at the start of production).

            Most of the components - foreign production, sensors, clutch, bearings, nozzles ... Shame! We cannot produce it ourselves. Already the Chinas are building workshops for the production of components for our cars
            1. S-kerrigan
              S-kerrigan 22 February 2018 08: 16
              +1
              Most of the components

              It is not true. Neither by weight nor by specific quantity.
              We ourselves cannot produce

              We can, but it will be worse in terms of price / quality - people do not want to pay more for the worst.
              The same automatic transmission is a complex mechanism, when they could do it with an acceptable ratio, they replaced it.
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 19 February 2018 08: 28
    +6
    Someone somewhere is seriously cheating in economic analysis and statistics
    But it’s really interesting how Russia still has not only not fallen, but is also building up strength with all the Western and our liberals analyzing the economy. It is generally accepted that the United States is all, that's what they think. And in Munich, everything was just fine, only lamentations about the "aggressive policy" of Russia from representatives of the United States, Britain and some of their satellites tightened.
    1. Monster_Fat
      Monster_Fat 19 February 2018 10: 26
      +7
      "Builds up"? Remember how one famous character advised, “And God save you, don’t read the Soviet newspapers until lunch ...” An opinion is now being formed, depending on which media “blow” into your ears. If you read a local newspaper in my state for a month and listen to local media, you get the impression that neither Russia nor Europe is at all, but there is China and the DPRK .... wink
      1. Victor Kamenev
        19 February 2018 17: 07
        +1
        And the Internet in your state only you?
        1. Monster_Fat
          Monster_Fat 19 February 2018 17: 39
          +4
          The key word in my post is if. Well, what about the "Internet" ... so everyone is looking in the internet for what interests him. In the USA, no one is interested in world news, everyone is interested only in local news, baseball with basketball, sales and social networks. What is being done in the world? Yes, figs ... Americans are, in fact, apolitical to the extreme ... wink
    2. forester
      forester 23 February 2018 16: 00
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Someone somewhere is seriously cheating in economic analysis and statistics
      But it’s really interesting how Russia still has not only not fallen, but is also building up strength with all the Western and our liberals analyzing the economy. It is generally accepted that the United States is all, that's what they think. And in Munich, everything was just fine, only lamentations about the "aggressive policy" of Russia from representatives of the United States, Britain and some of their satellites tightened.

      But such we are mysterious))) and with this they (the West) are not satisfied and scare. How are they? - do it or die (although you’re not ready to die), but with us? - and with us - die but do it !!!
  5. Loess
    Loess 19 February 2018 08: 47
    +6
    EU collapses under the weight of economic success
    Well said.
    This is generally a mystery: how does Russia with an economy of 2% of the world manage to resist the United States and the whole West with more than 20% of it? I don’t know where and how statistics and the entire economic community lie, but common sense insists that they lie somewhere!
    Either we do not have 2%, or the West does not have 20%, but the idea is really interesting.
    1. andrej-shironov
      andrej-shironov 19 February 2018 09: 48
      +4
      wink Toli woman died, felts boar. What do you want to believe in? Meanwhile, industrial production continues to fall in Russia.
      1. Loess
        Loess 19 February 2018 09: 56
        +5
        Quote: andrej-shironov
        Meanwhile, industrial production continues to fall in Russia.
        Production, production, hatred ... Which one is falling?
        1. andrej-shironov
          andrej-shironov 19 February 2018 10: 00
          +2
          laughing In general, the question has been exhausted by Less.
          1. Loess
            Loess 19 February 2018 10: 06
            +3
            Was there a question?)
            1. andrej-shironov
              andrej-shironov 19 February 2018 10: 12
              +2
              smile Loess, you know that I feel good about you, But you would first look at the statistics of Rosstat for January 2018. And the phrase about “what kind of industrial production” is very indicative.
              1. Loess
                Loess 19 February 2018 10: 27
                +10
                Yes, I, it seems, also do not treat you badly) But really, industrial production is a wide segment. Again, depending on what values ​​to consider. I’m never an economist, and it was you who caught the topic of the fall in industrial production, but I won’t refer to Rosstat, I’ll tell you by the example of our organization. Over the past year, orders for expensive, labor-intensive and ... ahem ... more high-tech equipment have grown significantly and orders for cheaper and mass products have sagged (despite the fact that the middle-price segment also shows an increase in orders). As a result, if you count in pieces - we have a decline, if in money - we have growth. It happened, and vice versa, the growth in demand for cheaper products led to an increase in indicators "in pieces" and "drawdown" of profit for the year. And this year, demand for more expensive products has not yet declined. So that
                Quote: andrej-shironov
                The phrase about "what kind of industrial production" is very revealing.
                in this case, your response to this phrase is indicative.
                1. andrej-shironov
                  andrej-shironov 19 February 2018 15: 45
                  0
                  Quote: Less
                  Yes, I, it seems, also do not treat you badly) But really, industrial production is a wide segment. Again, depending on what values ​​to consider. I’m never an economist, and it was you who caught the topic of the fall in industrial production, but I won’t refer to Rosstat, I’ll tell you by the example of our organization. Over the past year, orders for expensive, labor-intensive and ... ahem ... more high-tech equipment have grown significantly and orders for cheaper and mass products have sagged (despite the fact that the middle-price segment also shows an increase in orders). As a result, if you count in pieces - we have a decline, if in money - we have growth. It happened, and vice versa, the growth in demand for cheaper products led to an increase in indicators "in pieces" and "drawdown" of profit for the year. And this year, demand for more expensive products has not yet declined. So that
                  Quote: andrej-shironov
                  The phrase about "what kind of industrial production" is very revealing.
                  in this case, your response to this phrase is indicative.

                  Loess statistics are statistics as if someone did not belong to it! And the fact that your company has increased by something orders does not change these statistics. And what you mean is called the structure of production. And why is the Rosstat decree not for you? Do you not believe in arguments from science?
                  1. Loess
                    Loess 19 February 2018 15: 58
                    +5
                    Why don’t I believe? I believe. But the decline in industrial production in the month of January is quite natural - more holidays - less working days. So I do not consider the January decline a big disaster or any other important indicator. In addition, this is a decline in production relative to December last year, but in comparison with January 2017, we have an increase in production. And if you do not know, then at the end of the year there is a shock development of budget funds, so as not to return them to the treasury, this explains the decrease in production growth rates when comparing the period at the end of the outgoing year - the beginning of the next. And this is also statistics. Take an interest in leisure.
                    1. andrej-shironov
                      andrej-shironov 19 February 2018 16: 07
                      0
                      Loess, I know all this no worse than yours. smile Just a tendency from year to year to reduce industrial production in Russia. Do you recognize?
                      1. Loess
                        Loess 19 February 2018 16: 24
                        +5
                        Why did it happen?
                        Quote: andrej-shironov
                        Just a tendency from year to year to reduce industrial production in Russia. Do you recognize?
                        That is the trend I do not see. On the contrary, I see the prospects)
                2. Alber
                  Alber 21 February 2018 12: 21
                  0
                  Quote: Less
                  I’ll say by the example of our organization. Over the past year, orders for expensive, labor-intensive and ... ahem ... more high-tech equipment have grown strongly and orders for cheaper and mass products have sagged (despite the fact that the middle-price segment also shows an increase in orders). As a result, if you count in pieces - we have a decline, if in money - we have growth. It happened, and vice versa, the growth in demand for cheaper products led to an increase in

                  And you are the whole country?
                  If you are in Maskva or St. Petersburg, well, maybe everything is spinning in Kaluga or Tatarstan, this does not mean that everything in the camp is good ...
                  In most regions, even central Russia, industry is killed. Well, or lying on its side.
                  1. Loess
                    Loess 21 February 2018 12: 40
                    +1
                    It’s six times farther from me to Moscow than from Moscow to Kaluga, and the region is considered depressive according to statistics. So do not tell me stories about how people live outside the Moscow Ring Road. And in other regions I also visited and saw a lot with my own eyes and with the same hard workers as I did, I talked, and not from reports on television and other media.
                    Quote: Alber
                    And you are the whole country?

                    No, I'm not "the whole country." And you, by the way, too. I am only a citizen of Russia.
                    1. Andrew67
                      Andrew67 21 February 2018 22: 37
                      0
                      Your opponent will get out as you like, at least some arguments you will bring. Very stubborn comrade
                    2. Alber
                      Alber 24 February 2018 13: 27
                      0
                      Quote: Less
                      No, I'm not "the whole country." I am only a citizen of Russia.
                      Reply

                      those. have citizenship ...
                      But have you tried to be a citizen?
              2. Stas157
                Stas157 19 February 2018 10: 37
                +7
                By the way, it is very interesting, but was the GDP growth in 2017? They threatened as much as 1,5% in plus to raise! Why are counters from the economic bloc silent? Or, as usual, worked negatively again?
                But, even if all of a sudden, the economy works at a percentile plus, then people are still too early to enjoy! After all, they already considered that the level of income of citizens for 2017 fell. Hello to those who vote for Putin!
                1. Stas157
                  Stas157 19 February 2018 10: 55
                  +3
                  Quote: Stas157
                  But, even if all of a sudden, the economy works at a percentile plus, then people are still too early to enjoy! After all, they already considered that the level of income of citizens for 2017 fell. Hello to those who vote for Putin!

                  Just because the growth of the economy is 1-2%, it is very small in order for our billionaires to add + 20% per year! Therefore, the growth of billions in the Kremlin is due to the rest of the population.
      2. Days
        Days 19 February 2018 14: 47
        +6
        Quote: andrej-shironov
        Meanwhile, industrial production continues to fall in Russia.


        No.

        http://www.gks.ru/bgd/free/b00_24/IssWWW.exe/Stg/
        d000 / I001700R.HTM

        What's next for the training manual?

        "Yes, your statistics are shit!"
        "To trust Rostat - do not respect yourself! Here our Ukrstat always tells the truth!"
        "Why are you pushing for bullshit, I'm an ordinary resident of Russia, what, with my own eyes, I don’t see?"
        "Putin ruined the country, lalalala"
        1. andrej-shironov
          andrej-shironov 19 February 2018 15: 47
          0
          laughing Your fakes do not respect yourself. Have you visited this page for a long time? You change yours from Putin. wink
    2. Victor Kamenev
      19 February 2018 17: 08
      0
      Interestingly, it is not interesting to large economists.
  6. BAI
    BAI 19 February 2018 08: 59
    +5
    Russia has never been as strong as it is today.

    Well, the USSR still catch up and catch up. The peak of strength and international authority of Russia (USSR) is the 60s.
    This is generally a mystery: how does Russia with an economy of 2% of the world manage to resist the United States and the whole West with more than 20% of them?

    The author is not quite up to date with economics.
    The dollar in Russia NEVER matched the true value of the ruble. As an American currency, he became attached to something unfavorable for Russia. To oil, computers (in the early 90s, such a term existed - "computer course"), etc. And in space and the defense industry, the ruble was much more expensive than the dollar. According to experts (not Isaev and Kamenev), one ruble invested in space cost $ 7. In the defense industry - compare the cost of the experimental “Armata” (which will still fall in mass production) and the serial “Abrams”. About the serial T-72, I generally keep quiet.
    1. Victor Kamenev
      19 February 2018 17: 11
      +1
      You tell economists that your courses do not interest me, but the real economic power is in the fog of statistics and verbiage "about courses."
  7. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 19 February 2018 09: 46
    +4
    Victor, the article is certainly controversial and very. I’ll say what is controversial: alas, Russia is not the strongest in its history, due to the liberal-oligarchic comprador power. Do not wishful thinking really.
    Here's what the Americans gave the otter in Syria, it's high time! And really shout about it is not worth it. As I wrote, drones were launched not by ISIS, but by specialists (greetings to everyone who yelled at me and claimed that the ISIS group was destroyed).
    1. Victor Kamenev
      19 February 2018 17: 12
      0
      Hello communist-utopian power!
      1. GIS
        GIS 21 February 2018 07: 52
        0
        I do not quite understand, is sarcasm?
        if so, where does the otvetka in Syria and the communists
        if not, then why greet future "utopians"?
  8. Some kind of compote
    Some kind of compote 19 February 2018 12: 29
    +16
    I do not understand how Russia, with its “gas station economy”, can successfully confront the entire collective West.

    Exactly
    Right on target
    But ... you cannot understand Russia with your mind
  9. kunstkammer
    kunstkammer 19 February 2018 12: 41
    +4
    It’s time to introduce cons for such articles. It’s hard to imagine more delirium.
    Russia does not press heavily on Bandera, as Poland, perhaps pushing it into Europe

    Poland closes the border for the Bandera rabble ... and we are "kindly requested" for them - all sorts of accomplices of murderers and preachers of fierce hatred in Russia earn a lot of money for their activities.
    And this is called - "pushing into Europe"? Bullshit!
    US-Russian military parity says their real economies are comparable

    Military parity is the merit of the Soviet Union. And not a bunch of "effective managers" ... no need to distort the facts!
    The Russian Empire ... bought shells in Europe

    Well, modern Russia in general still imports 70 percent of all goods! And what is this talking about? At the end of the war, by the way, the Russian empire almost completely began to provide shells for its army. This is for 2 - 3 of the year! And what has the modern government managed to do for the same 3 years of sanctions? Minuscule!
    “Minsk policy” of Russia - forced

    This is generally a masterpiece! Given that Putin is in fact the author of this agreement ... who forced him? And precisely at that moment when the boilers of the Nazi troops were successfully liquidated? Roughly, if during the cleaning of the Stalingrad boiler, Stalin would offer Hitler ... a truce! And what? Better a bad world ....
    Russia ... can successfully confront the entire collective West

    Yes, Russia is not opposed to anyone! Even the most inveterate Russophobic regimes like in Poland, the Baltic states or Ukraine! We are PARTNERS and successfully trade. And we invest our money in their economy ... not in their economy ... no. Russia is the first among investments in Bandera, which kills everything Russian - the Ukrainian country! A terrible paradox! This means people in Russia are sitting ready to support this policy!

    they are lying somewhere

    Somewhere? Yes, this article is full of "so-called - lies"!
    1. Victor Kamenev
      19 February 2018 17: 13
      +2
      However, insanity is getting stronger, you would read McCain, or what?
      1. The comment was deleted.
  10. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 19 February 2018 18: 09
    +1
    Loess,
    Quote: Less
    Why did it happen?
    Quote: andrej-shironov
    Just a tendency from year to year to reduce industrial production in Russia. Do you recognize?
    That is the trend I do not see. On the contrary, I see the prospects)

    wink Apparently, Loess, my arguments turned out to be more weighty once you turned off the comment. wink
  11. P0LYM
    P0LYM 19 February 2018 18: 28
    +4
    Urrraaaa !!!! Urrraaa !!!! Urrrraaaa !!!!! I love Russia, I don’t like hat-takers ... it's not good and it's ugly
    The USSR did not carry out a single operation similar to today's Syrian, there weren’t even such plans, feel the difference.

    I want to draw the attention of the author, here you suffered ... a campaign !!! The USSR broke the Hitler ridge ... the USSR created a vigorous bomb .... the USSR created and developed nuclear energy ... the USSR created and developed EVERYTHING that we are now stupidly doping ... Reporting on the successes of the present, we can only underestimate the past ...
  12. steelmaker
    steelmaker 19 February 2018 22: 30
    +3
    A joyful screech has begun! Only these words, but in reality we only manage to dodge. I don’t want to talk about our economy.
  13. iouris
    iouris 20 February 2018 14: 16
    +1
    Quote: “Equal rivalry in Syria ...” End of quote.
    The events of recent weeks do not seem to confirm this statement.
  14. gsev
    gsev 20 February 2018 22: 31
    0
    US confrontation with Russia is expensive. An example is the beginning of an inter-Korean dialogue. At the Olympics, senior representatives of the north and south openly demonstrate that they have established contacts. On Korean sites (see links, for example, on Kore seram), the tactics and culture of dialogue between the North and the South are openly discussed. In the south, the family of the former president and dictator of South Korea, a great anti-communist, is discredited. And China seems to play along with the ambitions of a reviving Korean state. For example, with the South Koreans, electronics is being developed and exported, although China has half the price of excellent quality.
  15. iouris
    iouris 21 February 2018 02: 27
    0
    Quote: "Historically, Russia has never been as strong as it is today." The end of the quote.
    Is history power?
    Quote: “suffered defeats on the German front in World War I” End of quote.
    Everyone was defeated. And where was the front line in November 1917? I answer: somewhere in Latvia. Where is Latvia? Where the modern RF ends.
    Quote: "I do not understand how Russia, with a" gas station economy ", can successfully confront the entire collective West." The end of the quote.
    Well yes. This is impossible to understand. The Russian Federation is a member of the WTO, all the allies of the USSR are defeated, the territory and resources of the USSR are fragmented, the financial system of the Russian Federation depends on the dollar, the Russian economy depends on Western technologies and the supply of high-tech components ... And maybe there is no such “confrontation”?