Military Review

The White House commented on information on the use of chemical weapons by Turkey in Syria

78
In Washington, they are aware of Damascus’s claim against the Turkish army in connection with the use of chemical weapons against the Kurds in Afrin, but consider this unlikely, reports RIA News statement by White House spokesman Michael Anton.




Earlier, Syrian State Agency SANA, referring to the hospital director Afrin Joan Mohamad, reported that the Turkish military had used toxic substances in the Syrian Afrin region, as a result of which 6 people were hospitalized with asthma symptoms.

We are familiar with these messages, we can not confirm them. However, we believe it is highly unlikely that the Turkish forces used chemical weapon. We continue to urge (parties) to show restraint and protect civilians in Afrin,
reported Anton.

Recall that from January 20 Turkey is conducting an “Olive Branch” operation in Syrian Afrinne, directed against Kurdish formations. Together with the Turkish army, there are detachments of the "Syrian Free Army".

According to the Turkish Defense Ministry, published on Saturday, 1595 "terrorists" were destroyed in total during the hostilities, to which the Turkish authorities include both members of the Kurdish militia and ISIS militants (the group is banned in the Russian Federation).
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The black
    The black 18 February 2018 08: 15
    +2
    Most likely the Turks haven’t used chemical weapons yet, but if they do, I won’t be surprised ...
    1. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 18 February 2018 08: 19
      +5
      a total of 1595 "terrorists" were destroyed,

      Not bad urine ... Although I think half of them are civilians .. And chemical weapons are no longer even funny!
      1. Shurik70
        Shurik70 18 February 2018 10: 07
        0
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Not bad urine ...

        It's modern Turks. Achievements should be divided by twenty, and their official losses multiplied by five.
        At the expense of chemical weapons - modern NATO is guided by the principle of "while you win cheaply and honestly, you have to play fair"so that until they are pressed there, there will be no chemical weapons. The genocide of civil Kurds will be" quietly ", but they will be blamed on the Kurds and Assad. But when they are pressed, they will go dirty methods, but again they will dump on others
        1. Master
          Master 18 February 2018 11: 23
          +1
          Quote: Shurik70
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Not bad urine ...

          It's modern Turks. Achievements should be divided by twenty, and their official losses multiplied by five.
          At the expense of chemical weapons - modern NATO is guided by the principle of "while you win cheaply and honestly, you have to play fair"so that until they are pressed there, there will be no chemical weapons. The genocide of civil Kurds will be" quietly ", but they will be blamed on the Kurds and Assad. But when they are pressed, they will go dirty methods, but again they will dump on others

          I don’t know about the losses of the Kurds. But what about their losses. It is impossible to hide it in Turkey. They are proud of their martyrs. The whole city is participating in the funeral. It’s not for you to shut up about Wagner. Think about who is hiding his losses. Although not state. Organization
          1. Lelek
            Lelek 18 February 2018 12: 10
            +1
            Quote: Master
            It’s not for you to shut up about Wagner.

            hi
            Speaking of Wagner. SDF spokesman Nasser Haji Mansour explains why the US attacked PMC fighters:

            Those. Americans, with their inherent arrogance, believe that the territories and oil fields belong to America. The banal logic of the Anglo-Saxons is "mine is mine and yours is mine too."
            As for the dead fighters of PMC "Wagner", the head of this organization Andrei Troshev gives explanations on this subject:
            1. Shurik70
              Shurik70 18 February 2018 15: 17
              0
              Quote: Master
              about their losses. It is impossible to hide it in Turkey. They are proud of their martyrs. The whole city is participating in the funeral

              Do they publish lists of the dead? Or just the death toll?
              If only the number and deaths from different cities, the losses can be hidden. If you publish a list of names, you won’t hide it there. But I did not find a list in the media on the Internet.
              1. protoss
                protoss 19 February 2018 02: 16
                0
                publish a list with names, ranks, divisions and dates of death, google and find
      2. Nikolai Grek
        Nikolai Grek 19 February 2018 01: 57
        0
        Quote: MIKHAN
        a total of 1595 "terrorists" were destroyed,

        Not bad urine ... Although I think half of them are civilians .. And chemical weapons are no longer even funny!

        Representatives of the Kurds and the Syrian government confirmed that they had reached an agreement on the issue of the entry of Damascus troops into Afrin. It is reported by Reuters.

        According to the agency, an adviser to the representative of the Kurds in Afrin said that Damascus troops could enter the region in the next two days.
        https://iz.ru/710458/2018-02-19/smi-soobshchili-o
        -dogovorennosti-kurdov-s-damaskom-o-vvode-voisk-v
        -afrin

        request request
      3. Warrior with machine gun
        Warrior with machine gun 19 February 2018 12: 33
        +3
        but in this case, the sight of the amerobosacus immediately deteriorated)) and they can’t confirm anything))
    2. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 18 February 2018 08: 42
      +11
      hi
      Quote: Black
      if they apply, I won’t be surprised

      So the Turks can: they are in NATO. negative Again, tin double standards ... am
      1. Partyzan
        Partyzan 18 February 2018 09: 01
        +4
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Again, tin double standards ...

        Pasha? they have long triple standards laughing
        1. novel66
          novel66 18 February 2018 09: 03
          +4
          bye! Do they have standards?
          1. Partyzan
            Partyzan 18 February 2018 09: 05
            +5
            Quote: novel xnumx
            bye! Do they have standards?

            but what about?
            1st grade is your favorite
            2nd grade - geyropa and others like her
            3rd grade - everyone else
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 18 February 2018 09: 08
              +3
              Quote: Partyzan
              1st grade is your favorite
              2nd grade - geyropa and others like her
              3rd grade - everyone else

              Yeah, no arguing against the fact ... what
              1. Partyzan
                Partyzan 18 February 2018 09: 15
                +3
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                Yeah, no arguing against the fact ...

                1. bouncyhunter
                  bouncyhunter 18 February 2018 09: 18
                  +9
                  According to the picture:
                  At the end of the century he took and overthrew
                  An evil person is a kind person.
                  From a grenade launcher - slap him, a goat!
                  Consequently, good is stronger than evil!

                  bully
                  1. Partyzan
                    Partyzan 18 February 2018 09: 21
                    +5
                    Quote: bouncyhunter
                    Consequently, good is stronger than evil!

                    with a grenade launcher - definitely good drinks
                    1. novel66
                      novel66 18 February 2018 09: 29
                      +2
                      however, grenade launchers are more common among the evil ....
                      1. Partyzan
                        Partyzan 18 February 2018 09: 32
                        +2
                        Quote: novel xnumx
                        however, grenade launchers are more common among the evil ....

                        they just show them more often, and from the good - unexpected people, more often laughing
            2. PalBor
              PalBor 18 February 2018 10: 49
              +1
              Quote: Partyzan
              Quote: novel xnumx
              bye! Do they have standards?

              but what about?
              1st grade is your favorite
              2nd grade - geyropa and others like her
              3rd grade - everyone else

              And "extra" is Russia.
          2. LSA57
            LSA57 18 February 2018 09: 06
            +4
            Quote: novel xnumx
            bye! Do they have standards?

            there is. for your loved ones. and the standard is what I want, then I turn
          3. Lelek
            Lelek 18 February 2018 12: 21
            +1
            Quote: novel xnumx
            novel66

            hi Roman.
            That's right, Turkey is not our friend, but a fellow traveler on a certain section of the road and we will go along with it while it is beneficial for us. Yesterday, a note slipped through the media that during the “kneading” in Afghanistan, the Turks eliminated the mercenaries who fought in the ATO in the Donbass as part of the Armed Forces. Bravo, good news.
        2. Nikolai Grek
          Nikolai Grek 19 February 2018 02: 20
          0
          Quote: Partyzan
          Quote: bouncyhunter
          Again, tin double standards ...

          Pasha? they have long triple standards laughing

          there finally there are no standards !!! request request request We act according to the situation - this is their motto !!! negative negative negative moreover, they assess the situation inadequately !!! wassat wassat wassat
    3. Spartanez300
      Spartanez300 18 February 2018 08: 43
      +5
      But what about the USA as ardent opponents of the use of chemical weapons did not launch missiles in the Turks, all the same, evidence is not necessary for them. Our government shows stupidity by providing modern weapons (S-400) to Turkey, then as if these missiles didn’t fly into our planes, which is quite real.
      1. LSA57
        LSA57 18 February 2018 08: 49
        +3
        Quote: Spartanez300
        then, as if in our planes, these missiles did not fly, but this is quite real.

        real war with NATO? yes you, they know perfectly well that the stripes will not climb for them, but they will not dare alone
        1. Spartanez300
          Spartanez300 18 February 2018 09: 27
          +2
          But what about our downed SU - 24, after all, no one declared war either, however, we wiped this spit and began to be friends with Turkey. "Like a wolf he doesn’t feed, he still looks into the forest," this is a metaphor about Turkey.
          1. LSA57
            LSA57 18 February 2018 09: 37
            +2
            Quote: Spartanez300
            But what about our downed SU - 24,

            apparently dealt with this. and judging by what they sold, there were reasons for that. we don’t know anything about what we agreed on and under what conditions we sold
            1. Spartanez300
              Spartanez300 18 February 2018 09: 43
              +1
              What is a contract is a stroke of a pen on paper that costs nothing to break, and the Turks have been great masters since ancient times. There can be no conditions either, because a weapon is just a weapon, pressed a button and all the short life. Like you for the dialogue.
              1. LSA57
                LSA57 18 February 2018 09: 48
                +2
                Quote: Spartanez300
                What is a contract is a stroke of a pen on paper that costs nothing to break, and the Turks have been great masters since ancient times.

                do not sign any contracts with anyone at all?
                There can be no conditions either, because a weapon is just a weapon, pressed a button and all the short life.

                yes, actually all over the world they sell weapons. and not rarely does it turn against the seller. weapons were riveted by the whole Union, and it shoots against us in Georgia and Urquain
      2. Partyzan
        Partyzan 18 February 2018 09: 02
        +1
        Quote: Spartanez300
        Our government shows stupidity by providing modern weapons (S-400) to Turkey

        and striped?
      3. sogdy
        sogdy 18 February 2018 11: 54
        +1
        Quote: Spartanez300
        But what about the USA as ardent opponents of the use of chemical weapons did not launch missiles in the Turks, all the same for them evidence is not needed

        Taki 6000 is not 60, scary adnaka.
        And yes, the statement of the Chief Physician of the city - this is regarded as a fact.
    4. Ascetic
      Ascetic 18 February 2018 09: 19
      +5
      Quote: Black
      Most likely the Turks haven’t used chemical weapons yet, but if they do, I won’t be surprised ...

      Back in 2013 there was a scandal with sarin shipments from Turkey to the militants of the Caliphate, which they used in a suburb of Damascus, killing hundreds of people.
    5. svp67
      svp67 18 February 2018 09: 24
      +1
      Quote: Black
      Most likely the Turks haven’t used chemical weapons yet, but if they do, I won’t be surprised ...

      The accusation of using Chemical Weapons is very serious and it is worthwhile to figure out what is being accepted by the Kurds under it. If the use of "tear gas" to disperse the crowd of locals who blocked the road, then this is one thing. If the use of "white phosphorus", which causes severe poisoning in humans, then this is completely different ...
      1. Alex-a832
        Alex-a832 18 February 2018 09: 42
        +2
        Quote: svp67
        Quote: Black
        Most likely the Turks haven’t used chemical weapons yet, but if they do, I won’t be surprised ...

        The accusation of using Chemical Weapons is very serious and it is worthwhile to figure out what is being accepted by the Kurds under it. If the use of "tear gas" to disperse the crowd of locals who blocked the road, then this is one thing. If the use of "white phosphorus", which causes severe poisoning in humans, then this is completely different ...

        Any facts of the use of weapons of mass destruction must be thoroughly investigated, especially prohibited. Though with the bragging UN commissions, even the OSCE.
        Since WWII, the United States has been the leader in the inhumane use of weapons of mass destruction. If you do not take the gas chambers of the Nazi concentration camps, then Washington has long surpassed Hitler and begs for several Nuremberg processes!
        1. bane's jacket
          bane's jacket 18 February 2018 09: 48
          0
          Quote: Alex-a832

          Since WWII, the United States has been the leader in the inhumane use of weapons of mass destruction. If you do not take the gas chambers of the Nazi concentration camps, then Washington has long surpassed Hitler and begs for several Nuremberg processes!

          Let's get the facts. Let's see and brand the USA together.
          1. svp67
            svp67 18 February 2018 10: 03
            +2
            Quote: bane's jacket
            Let's get the facts. Let's see and brand the USA together.


            1. bane's jacket
              bane's jacket 18 February 2018 10: 31
              0
              Quote: svp67
              Quote: bane's jacket
              Let's get the facts. Let's see and brand the USA together.



              Here zhezh bastards that do!

              Be sure to keep this your pearl!
              1. svp67
                svp67 18 February 2018 11: 19
                +2
                Quote: bane's jacket
                Be sure to keep this your pearl!

                I look at you, how these "zhurnalyug" have a "maidan of the human brain", you already cannot distinguish the jungle from Russian forests. By the way, this photo is FRAME from the Vietnamese Chronicle ... I hope that this aircraft from that group has distinguished signs of nationality ..
                1. bane's jacket
                  bane's jacket 18 February 2018 12: 17
                  0
                  Quote: svp67
                  Quote: bane's jacket
                  Be sure to keep this your pearl!

                  I look at you, how these "zhurnalyug" have a "maidan of the human brain", you already cannot distinguish the jungle from Russian forests. By the way, this photo is FRAME from the Vietnamese Chronicle ... I hope that this aircraft from that group has distinguished signs of nationality ..

                  Yes, I distinguish. I admit my (to put it mildly) mistake. Just by copying and pasting a picture into the search, the first two links I got specifically about the Samara region. and forest pests.
                  Now seriously. Having never justified the United States for using Agent Orange in many countries of the world, but approaching the issue formally and only from the point of view of facts (and you can see right away, a supporter of pure facts), I want to remind you that:
                  1. Agent Orange is not an officially recognized WMD anywhere in the world.
                  2. Some countries quite officially used Agent Orange in their own countries for the same defoliation of forests during the construction of dams. For instance:
                  Brazil
                  The Brazilian government in the late 1960s used herbicides to defoliate a large section of the Amazon rainforest so that Alcoa could build the Tucuruí dam to power mining operations. Large areas of rainforest were destroyed, along with the homes and livelihoods of thousands of rural peasants and indigenous tribes
                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange

                  3. The same Americans did not consider his WMD and quite calmly sprayed it in front of them without caring about any means of protection.


                  What do you think? If you approach it completely formally, can Americans be held accountable for the conscious use of WMD from your photo or not?
                  PS: Once again - I do not justify the Americans for this at all, and this is still mildly said.
          2. Alex-a832
            Alex-a832 18 February 2018 23: 49
            +1
            Quote: bane's jacket
            Let's get the facts. Let's see and brand the USA together.

            I'm talking about WMD, and not just about chemistry. In Vietnam, they had a whole testing ground for weapons of mass destruction. In addition to Agent Orange, the United States twice used nuclear weapons in cities with a civilian population. Who else boasts this ?! The forbidden "white phosphorus" was used more than once during the bombing. Despite the ban chemical. weapons, your "infallible" USA has not yet got rid of it (and this is with an overabundance of time and finances). Will we brand, or is it so, excusable for "exceptional" pranks?
            1. bane's jacket
              bane's jacket 19 February 2018 08: 44
              0
              Quote: Alex-a832
              In addition to Agent Orange, the United States twice used nuclear weapons in cities with a civilian population. Who else boasts this ?!

              As for nuclear weapons - no questions. Applied and burn them in hell for it.
              In Vietnam, they had a whole testing ground for weapons of mass destruction.

              Personally, I do not know about this. For what specific WMD was the landfill and where was it located? Was it WMD, or was it like Agent Orange?
              Despite the ban chemical. weapons, your "infallible" US still have not got rid of it

              Despite the ban on the storage of chemical weapons?
              Will we brand, or is it so, excusable for "exceptional" pranks?

              We will definitely brand. For the cause, not fiction. You cannot defeat evil.
              PS: svp67, for some reason did not answer my question. Maybe you can do it for him? So, "Agent Orange", used by the Americans in Vietnam (and not only), is WMD and, knowing this, they used it knowingly and illegally?
    6. vlad66
      vlad66 18 February 2018 09: 36
      +7
      Quote: Black
      Most likely the Turks haven’t used chemical weapons yet, but if they do, I won’t be surprised ...

      And if they apply then:
      We are familiar with these messages, we cannot confirm them. However, we believe that it is highly unlikely that Turkish forces used chemical weapons. We continue to urge (the parties) to restrain and protect civilians in Afghanistan, Anton said.

      Everything as usual. yes
    7. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii 18 February 2018 10: 56
      +8
      Turks, Americans, hand warms hand, one field of berries. A chemical weapon is assigned, roles are distributed. We can only declare as in the film: "This is an abusive role, please do not apply it to me."
  2. 210ox
    210ox 18 February 2018 08: 19
    +2
    Where are the White Helmets ?! Ah! They also used something there ... But all the same, Assad and the Russia that covers him are guilty ..
    1. LSA57
      LSA57 18 February 2018 08: 36
      +3
      Quote: 210ox
      Where are the White Helmets ?!

      they appear when a provocation and it is necessary to indirectly blame Russia. but here you can’t drag it by the ears
      1. novel66
        novel66 18 February 2018 09: 04
        +2
        Hello! hi their helmets are turned inside out in order to change color lol
        1. LSA57
          LSA57 18 February 2018 09: 08
          +2
          Quote: novel xnumx
          their helmets are turned inside out in order to change color

          Hi hi hard hat chameleon lol the know-how of all these "truth-cutters"
    2. bane's jacket
      bane's jacket 18 February 2018 09: 20
      +2
      Quote: 210ox
      Where are the White Helmets ?! Ah! They also used something there ... But all the same, Assad and the Russia that covers him are guilty ..

      I want to ask you why, if Turkey really applied a chemical. weapons, then you are so interested in the reaction and response exclusively to the United States? Why are you not interested in the absence of any reaction on the part of Russia in this crime?
      Because Russia in Syria is at the same time with the Turks?
      1. Okolotochny
        Okolotochny 18 February 2018 09: 32
        +5
        Yes, because without concrete grounds and evidence, Russia does not blame anyone. Unlike ..... Guess what?
        1. bane's jacket
          bane's jacket 18 February 2018 09: 45
          0
          Quote: Okolotochny
          Yes, because without concrete grounds and evidence, Russia does not blame anyone.

          Really?
          Russia accused the USA of bombing the Syrian city of Aleppo
          https://www.rbc.ru/politics/11/02/2016/56bc3bd99a
          79472d73afc082

          What "concrete evidence" was provided by the RF Ministry of Defense in this (and such cases, tons) concrete case? Say or
          Guess yourself?
          1. Setrac
            Setrac 18 February 2018 11: 27
            0
            Quote: bane's jacket
            Really?

            Amazing yes! It turns out there are honest people in the world, but not Americans.
            Quote: bane's jacket
            What "concrete evidence" was provided by the RF Ministry of Defense in this (and such cases, tons) concrete case? Say or

            The difference is that Russia has not yet been caught on unfounded accusations, and there is no place to put stigmas on the Americans so lied. Therefore, the Russian Ministry of Defense can be taken a word, NATO and Israel can not be trusted in any way, because they talk about how they breathe.
            1. bane's jacket
              bane's jacket 18 February 2018 19: 03
              0
              Quote: Setrac

              The difference is that Russia has not yet been caught on unfounded accusations, and there is no place to put stigmas on the Americans so lied. Therefore, the Russian Ministry of Defense can be taken a word, NATO and Israel can not be trusted in any way, because they talk about how they breathe.

              I brought you a specific accusation of Russia against the United States and I can bring a bunch more. So what evidence did the Russian Defense Ministry provide in this particular case?
              This is it ...
              1. Setrac
                Setrac 18 February 2018 20: 56
                +1
                Quote: bane's jacket
                This is it ...

                You think hard, but I will explain.
                Quote: bane's jacket
                I brought you a specific accusation of Russia against the United States and I can bring a bunch more.

                Russia does not act on the basis of false data, which it itself provided. Russia will not start a war based on its own provocation, or simply shaking a test tube at the UN with unproven substance. Russia will not betray an ally for the sake of profit and will not be a deception to justify its actions.
                Quote: bane's jacket
                So what evidence did the Russian Defense Ministry provide in this particular case?

                Evidence is for deeds, not words. You have European thinking when words are more important than deeds, but Russians are not like that.
                1. bane's jacket
                  bane's jacket 19 February 2018 09: 02
                  0
                  Quote: Setrac
                  Quote: bane's jacket
                  This is it ...

                  You think hard, but I will explain.
                  Quote: bane's jacket
                  I brought you a specific accusation of Russia against the United States and I can bring a bunch more.

                  Russia does not act on the basis of false data, which it itself provided.

                  If someone of us thinks tightly, then this is definitely not me. The conversation began with approval
                  Quote: Okolotochny
                  Yes, because without concrete grounds and evidence, Russia does not blame anyone. Unlike ...

                  I cited a concrete unproven accusation (I didn’t deliberately throw them about a dozen) in Russia, and you started to move off the topic.
                  You have European thinking when words are more important than deeds, but Russians are not like that.

                  If you feel so comfortable - on health. I just once again demonstrated to you that Russia is also scattered with unsubstantiated accusations, but personally you cannot answer a simple question. hi
                  1. Setrac
                    Setrac 19 February 2018 18: 59
                    0
                    Quote: bane's jacket
                    I cited a concrete unproven accusation (I didn’t deliberately throw them about a dozen) in Russia, and you started to move off the topic.

                    This is someone who is moving off the topic. There is such a thing - military secret. If Russia is hiding the truth - is it to mislead the enemy, if the Americans are lying - is it based on selfish interests, do you feel the difference or should you chew?
                    In addition, we have voices paid by the West that lie on our behalf (for example, Ukhomats), but this is not our lie.
                    Quote: bane's jacket
                    I just once again demonstrated to you that Russia is also scattered with unsubstantiated accusations, but personally you cannot answer a simple question.

                    The answer is simple, Western "comrades" are openly lying, Russia cannot always prove its case, but this is not a lie. Russia did not attack anyone, shocking the UN with false evidence; Russia did not undermine its own warships in order to attack another state. And if someone there fooled on behalf of Russia, then it is necessary to understand who paid him, the State Department or Mi6.
                    1. bane's jacket
                      bane's jacket 20 February 2018 16: 30
                      0
                      Quote: Setrac
                      Quote: bane's jacket
                      I cited a concrete unproven accusation (I didn’t deliberately throw them about a dozen) in Russia, and you started to move off the topic.

                      This is someone who is moving off the topic. There is such a thing - military secret. If Russia is hiding the truth - this is to mislead the enemyif the Americans lie - this is based on selfish interests, you smell the difference or do you need to chew?

                      I feel of course, do not "chew"! good

                      In addition, we have voices paid by the West that lie on our behalf (for example, Ukhomats), but this is not our lie.

                      You are especially in shock today!
                      The official representative of the Ministry of Defense of Russia Igor
                      Konashenkov said that US Air Force assault aircraft attacked the Syrian city of Aleppo last Wednesday.
                      https://www.rbc.ru/politics/11/02/2016/56bc3bd99a
                      79472d73afc082

                      The answer is simple, Western "comrades" are openly lying, Russia cannot always prove its case, but this is not a lie.

                      But what about then
                      The difference is that Russia is still not caught on unfounded charges,

                      ??? Okay, you can’t answer. Everything is clear with you.
                      1. Setrac
                        Setrac 20 February 2018 18: 12
                        0
                        Quote: bane's jacket
                        The official representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense Igor
                        Konashenkov said that US Air Force assault aircraft attacked the Syrian city of Aleppo last Wednesday.

                        And where is the lie?
          2. Okolotochny
            Okolotochny 18 February 2018 18: 01
            +4
            A said, and tell B. Snapsky Rakii before "liberation" striped and after. What is not true? The United States and its satellites are an empire of lies, blood and profit. Did you get it? Or as Meehan says LIZANUL? Well do not stop, go on.
  3. prior
    prior 18 February 2018 08: 21
    +2
    Even if the Turks use chemical weapons, the Tomahawks will fly to Syria. They have such a program in their heads (I'm talking about Americans).
    1. LSA57
      LSA57 18 February 2018 08: 37
      +2
      Quote: prior
      Even if the Turks use chemical weapons, the Tomahawks will fly to Syria. They have such a program in their heads (I'm talking about Americans).

      what is sober on the mind, drunk on the tongue laughing which one is sober clear laughing
  4. K-50
    K-50 18 February 2018 08: 25
    +1
    Washington: We consider the use of chemical weapons unlikely

    Assad also did not use it at all, but the same thing did not stop Facington from accusing him of this.
    As always - double standards, but try to figure it out, "we better see the social network"? fool
    1. Azim77
      Azim77 18 February 2018 08: 35
      +1
      There are no standards. Only your goals and interests. And to achieve them, any reasons and reasons will be used. Which "sterlnet" will use that one. If necessary, they will say that the Martians in Syria were landing and the United States should protect the world from them ..
    2. Monarchist
      Monarchist 18 February 2018 08: 45
      0
      So everyone knows that Vova and Assad are being played with chemical weapons in the “kitchen”.
      A cousin said that as a child: when his mother was at work, he ran to a friend and did "smoke". But the "smoke" is a kind of chemical weapon
  5. Hagalaz
    Hagalaz 18 February 2018 08: 29
    0
    Only Americans can decide who and where used chemical weapons.
    1. LSA57
      LSA57 18 February 2018 08: 43
      +3
      Quote: Hagalaz
      Only Americans can decide who and where used chemical weapons.

      in the case of Syria, just do the president’s daughter
  6. Monarchist
    Monarchist 18 February 2018 08: 38
    0
    If the sultan was only "friends" with Volodya, perhaps they would have suggested that Vova "seduced" the sultan. And so: “we can’t confirm them”, pay attention to how streamlined it is said. They heard, but have not yet seen and therefore "extremely unlikely" that is, they are against chemical weapons, but they do not offend the Sultan. Until they offend
  7. ancestors from Don
    ancestors from Don 18 February 2018 08: 48
    0
    21 century, and everyone uses the hunches and suspicions, where are the praised American UAVs that it is impossible to conduct a chemical analysis of the area?
  8. Herculesic
    Herculesic 18 February 2018 08: 50
    0
    Probably the Turks, when they mistakenly kill the Ishilovites, do they immediately pay large compensation to the gang? Yes, and they apologize? How can they shoot "their own", or they "kill" the Ishilovites only in words?
  9. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 18 February 2018 09: 02
    +3
    we cannot confirm them
    They were modest. When “White Helmets” announce their use and present production videos, then the Americans with the collective support of the satellites start the op and accusations immediately without any verification. Of course, it is doubtful that the Turks would take on such responsibility as the use of chemical weapons even with the unpredictable Erdogan. Let's see how events develop.
  10. Hurricane70
    Hurricane70 18 February 2018 09: 04
    0
    Clear stump is unlikely! That's about Russia and about ATS they would sing to a friend!
  11. Monarchist
    Monarchist 18 February 2018 09: 05
    0
    Quote: Black
    Most likely the Turks haven’t used chemical weapons yet, but if they do, I won’t be surprised ...

    I agree with you: the "Sultan" is so far controlled without chemical weapons. All the same, a regular army and good supplies, but against the armed crowd and, moreover, without the support of aviation and tanks
  12. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 18 February 2018 09: 32
    +1
    We are familiar with these messages, we cannot confirm them.


    How can you not confirm ?! Blogs on the Internet say that the Turks used chemistry, so it is. Fake news is being accepted as proof against Assad, but why are we doubting Erdogan ?!
  13. APASUS
    APASUS 18 February 2018 09: 43
    +2
    It is very likely that the United States cannot choose a new strategy regarding Turkey’s actions in Syria. Otherwise, there were statements and all the controlled media screamed about the crime against humanity.
  14. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 18 February 2018 10: 27
    0
    And yet, men agree, while Turkey is wetting the Kurds, Russia and Syria have a rest and we are regrouping (well, the F-16s between the Jewish cases were shot down ..))) Everything is going fine so far!
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov 18 February 2018 12: 15
        0
        Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
        We leaked our guys without any answer, once again confirmed the myth of the invincibility of the Americans and the incompleteness of our warriors - and everything is fine!

        Nobody merged them .. These formations are illegal, someone merged of course from "ours" their promotion coordinates ..
        Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
        But a Jewish plane is like a Jewish plane, is there a great victory ..

        It was the revenge of the United States and Israel that was for the downed Jewish F-16 (the pilot will obviously not be able to fly either physically or morally, but they are expensive ..)) Now we are on the move, we will hunt for US rangers, etc. .. I don’t envy them if they come across ours (they are now evacuating urgently, the Russians are evil now!)
        Well, I wanted to say something like that ..
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. Andrey K
                Andrey K 18 February 2018 18: 57
                +5
                Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
                ... When it breaks out in the Donbass, and surely breaks out soon, we will see how many fools of the MO will want to go there. Hope not one ...

                You have an interesting song.
                And you know about the negotiations on the air (probably they were nearby, the encryption was sent by pigeons). And those who go to the Donbass, stupid people? And wishes in the absence of volunteers ...
                It’s good that there are no people like you in the Moscow Region and among the volunteers.
  15. pvv113
    pvv113 18 February 2018 10: 30
    +1
    We are familiar with these messages, we cannot confirm them

    But what, information from social networks is not enough?
  16. razved
    razved 18 February 2018 13: 20
    0
    Of course, they will doubt it. Indeed, otherwise, according to their logic, the Americans with their vassals would have to bomb in Turkey ...
  17. yehat
    yehat 19 February 2018 11: 46
    0
    strangulation can also be caused by traditional weapons
    e.g. thermobaric or napalm or dumb fires