Military Review

Russian armored rifles protected from shaped charges

40
On the Russian armored bulldozers B10M and B12, anti-cumulative grids will appear, protecting the equipment. They put experts Chelyabinsk Tractor Plant.


Russian armored rifles protected from shaped charges


As reported at the company, it will be an additional protection. On the bulldozers are already booked cabin, hood elements, fuel tank and other nodes. This allows you to protect the person inside, not only from the rockfall, but also from bullets and fragments.

Unlike foreign counterparts, Russian armored trolley dozers do not have side louvers for the air intake. The engine is cooled through the gap between the cab and the hood. A limited view due to the small bulletproof glass is fully compensated by video cameras.

We will continue to upgrade our special equipment. We envisage the installation of additional equipment on the armored machines, we create other special options that improve the design parameters of the machines, including the degree of their security
- said Sergey Gusev, head of special equipment at ChTZ.

We recall earlier in the engineering troops received the first batch of armored bulldozers, which were created taking into account the Syrian military experience, reports "RG-Sila"
Photos used:
http://vikond65.livejournal.com/532339.html
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Warrior with machine gun
    Warrior with machine gun 16 February 2018 11: 49
    +7
    not bad, otherwise the Amerzot coalition loves to attack bulldozers too)))
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 16 February 2018 12: 13
      +1
      Quote: Warrior with a machine gun
      not bad, otherwise the Amerzot coalition loves to attack bulldozers too)))

      They shot mopeds there. Also need to book.
      1. MoJloT
        MoJloT 16 February 2018 13: 00
        +4
        It’s not serious where the dynamic protection is, the arena can be put up, a curtain, electronic warfare ... And the main gun will not hurt just in case.
        1. Shurik70
          Shurik70 16 February 2018 13: 27
          +4
          Quote: MoJloT
          It’s not serious where the dynamic protection is, the arena can be put up, a curtain, electronic warfare ... And the main gun will not hurt just in case.

          SAM and forgotten smoke generator. And an uninhabited tower. And the armored capsule with the crew should be lowered lower.
          1. MoJloT
            MoJloT 16 February 2018 14: 04
            0
            AGS is also a useful thing
    2. ancestors from Don
      ancestors from Don 16 February 2018 12: 55
      +2
      The circle "skillful hands", I can’t even imagine how the tractor driver feels, for comparison, when the tank trawl hits an anti-tank mine, the driver receives a slight concussion.
      1. Warrior with machine gun
        Warrior with machine gun 16 February 2018 12: 59
        +8
        sometimes there is a feeling that all the armies of the world have ceased to issue ARVs, and yet their cloud at the bases of different tanks is probably a bulldozer cheaper, market relations to push them into a swing))
  2. Lenivets2
    Lenivets2 16 February 2018 11: 51
    +1
    No, cool of course!
    But why? what
    Or it is planned to create a shock armored bulldozer division, but I do not know. belay
    ps I understand the plant (they need a little thing), but MO, why?
    1. figwam
      figwam 16 February 2018 11: 59
      +1
      So they plan to rake something under fire at the front line.
      1. Lenivets2
        Lenivets2 16 February 2018 12: 00
        +1
        To rake under fire!
        Is there a Rimbaud with a homemade bow driving?
    2. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 16 February 2018 12: 10
      +15
      Quote: Lenivets2
      No, cool of course!
      But why? what
      Or it is planned to create a shock armored bulldozer division, but I do not know. belay
      ps I understand the plant (they need a little thing), but MO, why?

      We have a company of "heavy equipment" in every engineering battalion. And we had to go near, and sometimes in front of tanks and armored personnel carriers. So heavily armored bulldozers are not a whim, but a necessity.
      1. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 16 February 2018 12: 14
        +6
        heavily armored bulldozers are not a whim, and the need.
        I agree with you. And mockery of engineering equipment (Lenivets2), which has to work in various conditions, is certainly not appropriate.
        1. Lenivets2
          Lenivets2 18 February 2018 01: 17
          0
          "And mockery of engineering equipment (Lenivets2), which has to work in different conditions, is certainly not appropriate."
          Why not appropriate?
          "which has to work in various conditions"
          Please list these conditions.
          Well, so that I know in what cases the commander will think of sending a tank with a bucket ahead of the battle formations, but a bulldozer with a suicide carrier.
          And if you mean that they can fire at him in the rear, then you need to book everything, AT ALL, including toilets and a field kitchen.
      2. ljoha_d
        ljoha_d 16 February 2018 21: 59
        +4
        I always liked how Israel relates to technology protection
      3. MoJloT
        MoJloT 13 August 2018 13: 18
        0
        heavily armored bulldozers are not a whim, but a necessity

        In particular, it’s much safer for you to destroy Palestinian houses.
  3. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 16 February 2018 11: 55
    +7
    Despite the reservation, these vehicles need "drone" in actions during direct shelling. Otherwise, victims cannot be avoided, since booking is good, but it’s still not a tank
    1. Romka47
      Romka47 16 February 2018 12: 24
      +1
      Yes, and it would probably be cheaper to insert a simple pezilotnik into a regular bulldozer. than sheathe the tractor with armor, and even the engine is probably more powerful placed there, the mass has grown.
      1. Grigory_45
        Grigory_45 17 February 2018 14: 30
        0
        Quote: Romka47
        Yes, and it would probably be cheaper to insert a simple pezilotnik into a regular bulldozer. than sheathe the tractor with armor, and even the engine is probably more powerful placed there, the mass has grown.

        and do not need to book an unmanned bulldozer? In the rubble there can be unexploded ordnance, fragments and stones will fly at it, they can shoot at it from the rifleman. How long is the "non-assault" option?
  4. asiat_61
    asiat_61 16 February 2018 12: 18
    0
    I read the news about all sorts of military news, and already takes evil. Why? Take a look. [Media = http: // https: //www.youtube.com/
    watch? v = mfn4-6vlt5I]
    1. asiat_61
      asiat_61 18 February 2018 03: 37
      0
      Of course, an armored bulldozer, the greatest achievement !!! These are modulators.
  5. taiga2018
    taiga2018 16 February 2018 12: 20
    +2
    people are more or less protected. but the hoses that stick out from behind the shovel somehow confuse me ...
  6. rocket757
    rocket757 16 February 2018 12: 35
    0
    Of course we have BATs, but maybe this identity will fit into the troops, as it should .... not an engineer, I did not storm the city, it's not for me to judge.
  7. Firework
    Firework 16 February 2018 12: 38
    +1
    a competent solution, protection against grenade launchers is needed but more importantly protection against a sniper bullet. if the armor holds a perfectly valid specimen
  8. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 16 February 2018 12: 42
    +3
    Oh, passions of the Lord! Holy, holy! Previously, machine guns were not given out to building workers, but now there are whole armored bulldozers! Now it’s not just “animals” that will be, but “Megazveri”! It’s not going to the Apocalypse! belay request crying
  9. x.andvlad
    x.andvlad 16 February 2018 12: 44
    +1
    This allows you to protect the person inside, not only from rockfall, but also from bullets and fragments.

    How dumbfounded this amateurish eloquence is!
    After all, it is said: "from bullets and fragments." Why did the “cumulative shells" appear in the title?
    Dear authors, you post your material on a military resource, which is sometimes read by knowledgeable people!
    Do you know that even tanks are not protected from cumulative shells to the end ?!
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 16 February 2018 18: 48
      +1
      Read carefully:
      According to the company, this will be additional protection. On bulldozers already booked cab, hood, fuel tank and other components. This allows you to save located inside a person not only from a rockfall, but also from bullets and fragments.

      That is, protection from stones, bullets and fragments on bulldozers already exists.
      And it is planned to install additional protection - anti-cumulative gratings. The lattices do not save from bullets and fragments - only from "godfathers", and not from everyone, but from the most common ones - from RPG grenades.
      1. x.andvlad
        x.andvlad 17 February 2018 18: 20
        0
        To blame. Sprayed. I agree. You need to read carefully, and not just look at the pictures.
        But on the other hand, I would still like to read the news about what has been done, and not about what will be done.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. Forever so
    Forever so 16 February 2018 12: 54
    +1
    oh, how it came as a youth)) peacefully plowing a Soviet tractor in the Mongolian territories))) And will there be wings to exit into the stratosphere ??))
  12. komynist
    komynist 16 February 2018 12: 56
    +4
    Something I don’t see anything so special. After Japanese technology, wild horror worked on our tractors. And this one also got armor, rollers, the engine probably remained the same. Here Aron monster posted on the photo here yeah. All closed hydraulic hoses are protected. And in the case of everything presented outward, the hoses hang out, the rods are open, both on the upper cylinders and on the warp from the bottom.
  13. - = ANTRAX = -
    - = ANTRAX = - 16 February 2018 13: 11
    0
    and WRIs are not suitable for such tasks?
  14. Albatroz
    Albatroz 16 February 2018 13: 32
    0
    He’s already without armor - bronik))
  15. Chichikov
    Chichikov 16 February 2018 16: 15
    0
    Mdya ..., and hydraulic systems are not protected, unlike the western analogs. Damage - and the bulldozer turns into a mobile sideboard!
  16. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 16 February 2018 16: 52
    0
    but how to transport them? and how much do they weigh?
    1. Grigory_45
      Grigory_45 17 February 2018 14: 40
      +1
      Quote: seregatara1969
      but how to transport them?

      using gravitsapa)
  17. Stiletto_711
    Stiletto_711 17 February 2018 00: 03
    0
    And why do you need to bother like that? Why not use a tank chassis as a base? what
    1. Grigory_45
      Grigory_45 17 February 2018 14: 24
      +1
      Quote: Stilett_71
      Why not use a tank chassis as a base?

      tank is much more expensive. Although you can hang a dump on the tank itself and use it as a bulldozer. And IMR and AREM have them regularly
  18. Grigory_45
    Grigory_45 17 February 2018 14: 21
    +2
    Russian armored rifles protected from shaped charges
    and how is protection achieved from cumulative ammunition? Combined armor half a meter thick? Dynamic protection? Probably all of this is there, but it is made using the absolute stealth technology and is equipped with an anti-gravity laughing
  19. Grigory_45
    Grigory_45 17 February 2018 14: 25
    +1
    Russian armored rifles protected from shaped charges
    such machines must first be protected from explosive devices, armor - only to protect against fragments
  20. VOENOBOZ
    VOENOBOZ 17 February 2018 20: 13
    0
    They blamed for everything, like some enemies. If it was done, then it is needed. Apparently, the old engineering equipment is not suitable for Syria, but it is necessary to carry out tasks. Not for nothing that Israel has created such equipment, such a region, and they have more experience. They have been fighting Arabs for almost 50 years, and that means something.
    1. BVS
      BVS 17 February 2018 21: 19
      0
      It seems to me that these bronzeurs are not for export. Most likely they can come in handy during assaults in urban conditions, maybe even in Russia. Probably one of the elements of preparation for the civil war. For it is difficult to imagine a situation in which the Russian army storms a Russian city that has already been captured by US and NATO forces.