Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Belarus announces the conditions for sending Belarusian peacekeepers to the Donbass

89
The Belarusian media, citing the country's defense minister, Lieutenant-General Andrei Ravkov, reports on what conditions must be met for Belarus to send its peacekeepers to the Donbass. According to the head of the defense department of Belarus, the mandate for peacekeepers should be issued by the UN Security Council. After that, the relevant decision should be made by the President of Belarus.

Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Belarus announces the conditions for sending Belarusian peacekeepers to the Donbass




From the statement of Andrey Ravkov (citation tyt.by):
We have a peacekeeping company, the number of people 100 people, 50 - permanent, 50 - variables. But the decision should be made by the UN Security Council, the country to which this company is being taken, and the country that sends it. We still have a decision to make the president. In addition, peacekeepers will have to sign a written consent. Subject to these conditions, we are ready to complete the task.


Recall that earlier the former NATO Secretary General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, said that an international peacekeeping contingent could be sent to the Donbass from states that are not in military blocs, as well as from a regional country. In particular, we are talking about the possible composition of such a contingent of troops from Belarus, Sweden and even Brazil.

At the same time, the same Rasmussen announced that NATO could provide Ukraine with a lethal weapon. This is one of a series of proposals for peacekeepers in Kosovo, when NATO, under the guise of introducing a peacekeeping contingent, actively armed Kosovo Albanians, among whom there were quite a few representatives of terrorist groups.
89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    14 February 2018 16: 57
    Belarusian media with reference to the Minister of Defense of the country, Lieutenant General Andrei Ravkov

    They won’t lie there. If referred, then really spoke.
    We still have to decide the president

    Still? Yes, only he decides! And he will sign for everyone, dad everything is allowed.
    1. +8
      14 February 2018 17: 00
      There was already a report on the zombie man.
      a mandate for peacekeepers should be issued by the UN Security Council. After that, the corresponding decision should be made by the President of Belarus

      Everything is within the legal framework.
      1. +14
        14 February 2018 17: 05
        100, and actually 50 people with the declared 20 thousand peacekeepers ... will not be enough .. recourse
        1. +5
          14 February 2018 17: 10
          So, after all, we are not talking about the fact that peacekeepers will be from one country.
          1. +9
            14 February 2018 17: 16
            I very much suspect that they will not have time to make a decision on peacekeepers, there the abscess is ready to burst.
            1. +5
              14 February 2018 17: 23
              It may very well be that you are right. But let's not make a guess - time will tell ...
              1. +5
                14 February 2018 17: 33
                Therefore, the article is provocative in nature, it is premature.
              2. +7
                14 February 2018 18: 06
                pasha hi I think that nothing will be there. The Kiev regime has chosen the right position in their opinion. To delay time, slowly push, provoke. It's no secret that people didn’t live better and were just tired of everything. From the war, from slurred politics in the Kremlin. A couple years and they will decide for themselves. Someone who will leave for Russia, the rest will remain near Kiev. Here you have to draw such gloomy conclusions.
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                It may very well be that you are right. But let's not make a guess - time will tell ...
          2. +1
            14 February 2018 17: 42
            Does it happen in Brazil?
            1. +2
              14 February 2018 18: 14
              Quote: kit88
              Does it happen in Brazil?

              Only for some reason it is called coke. It is necessary to ask sukashvili, he understands better.
              1. +4
                15 February 2018 10: 48
                In Donetsk, both snow and coke are black. laughing
            2. +1
              15 February 2018 12: 30
              Quote: kit88
              Does it happen in Brazil?

              There is no snow in Brazil. But there are many, many wild monkeys ...
        2. +1
          14 February 2018 18: 00
          I don’t think that there will be a peacekeeping mission in the Donbass. Well, maybe only in the territories controlled by Kiev. But that's another story.
          Quote: assa67
          100, and actually 50 people with the declared 20 thousand peacekeepers ... will not be enough .. recourse
      2. +8
        14 February 2018 17: 16
        They won’t lie there. If referred, then really spoke.

        To our great regret, they "breshet" here too. The Minister of Defense is an unworthy puppet, not a "minister", and certainly not a politician ...
        After the "October" hanging of a fighter in the training center "Pechinsky 72nd JLC" - he had to resign ... A living general, still (yesterday 13.02) was sitting at the reception of the President. According to the "officer honor" was obliged to SHOOT !!!
        This is NOT an OFFICER ...
        1. +8
          14 February 2018 17: 22
          Sanya, hi! hi By your logic, a bunch of officers of different ranks should have shot themselves in the temple after such cases. And not only in Belarus.
          1. +6
            14 February 2018 17: 42
            No, Pasha !!!! hi The officer’s code of honor provides ... Destruction of oneself in order to avoid "general disgrace" ...
            At the same time, SHOULD NOT BE WITNESSES ...
            The honor of an officer (and GENERAL !!!!) should be HOLY !!!!
            "Our" court-general "sharkun" licking ....
            Ugh ...
            1. +4
              14 February 2018 17: 52
              Quote: Cutter
              "Our" court-general "sharkun" licking ....

              Here in this I agree with you all 200% !!! drinks
              Quote: Cutter
              Ugh ...

              I am joining! soldier
        2. +1
          15 February 2018 13: 20
          Quote: Cutter
          They won’t lie there. If referred, then really spoke.

          The Minister of Defense is an unworthy puppet, not a "minister", and certainly not a politician ...
          After the "October" hanging of a soldier in the training center "Pechinsky 72nd OUTs" -had to resign...A living general, still (yesterday 13.02) sat at the reception of the President. According to the "officer honor" had to SHOOT!!!
          This is NOT an OFFICER ...

          Would you decide whether to resign or shoot yourself? What should the defense minister do if someone hangs himself somewhere in the armed forces?
          Are you really seriously convinced that if one stupid person hangs himself, then the Minister of Defense should resign? Maybe then, according to the code of honor of the ministers of defense, he should have inserted a stake in the back seat? laughing
      3. +13
        14 February 2018 17: 31
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Everything is within the legal framework.

        100 people Pasha is a drop in the bucket, they can only stop the beating of some farm. request
        1. +4
          14 February 2018 17: 35
          Vlad, but this is better than nothing!
          1. +7
            14 February 2018 17: 41
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            Vlad, but this is better than nothing!

            Wait and see Pasha request maybe there won't be any peacekeepers, maybe they will come from some normal country, but for now this is all the words. request drinks
            1. +3
              14 February 2018 17: 53
              I agree: we will not run ahead of the engine, waving a saber. Yes drinks
        2. +3
          14 February 2018 17: 36
          Vlad, this does not mean that they can’t put up anymore.
          1. +9
            14 February 2018 18: 20
            Quote: cniza
            Vlad, this does not mean that they can’t put up anymore.

            Vitya can, of course, but the UN is quoting the number and the topic between whom the conflict is taking place, Donetsk will certainly not be against it, and the alkanoid may rest against him. You know who to lick with. hi
            1. +4
              14 February 2018 18: 25
              Yes, he just pulls time, he does not want any peacekeepers except NATO and then in the person of the United States.
              1. +9
                14 February 2018 18: 32
                Quote: cniza
                Yes, he just pulls time, he does not want any peacekeepers except NATO and then in the person of the United States.

                Why doesn’t they want, they really want to block the border between Russia and the Lugansk and Donetsk regions, and that it would be “peacekeepers” standing on the border
                in the face of the United States.
                drinks
                1. +4
                  14 February 2018 18: 37
                  The Croatian version does not give him rest, so he bears something like that. drinks
                  1. +9
                    14 February 2018 18: 41
                    Quote: cniza
                    The Croatian version does not give him rest, so he bears something like that. drinks

                    They are already carrying it for the third year, earcaps. hi drinks
        3. +5
          14 February 2018 18: 15
          Quote: vlad66
          Quote: bouncyhunter
          Everything is within the legal framework.

          100 people Pasha is a drop in the bucket, they can only stop the beating of some farm. request

          They can’t do anything if banderlogs are covered with hail.
          1. +10
            14 February 2018 18: 24
            Quote: Balu
            They can’t do anything if banderlogs are covered with hail

            Baloo hi The stump is clear that they will not be able to oppose the Grad. But at the same time Qazus belly with Belarus arises, like a tie-eater 08 08 08. hi
            1. +6
              14 February 2018 18: 32
              Quote: vlad66
              Quote: Balu
              They can’t do anything if banderlogs are covered with hail

              Baloo hi The stump is clear that they will not be able to oppose the Grad. But at the same time Qazus belly with Belarus arises, like a tie-eater 08 08 08. hi

              Vlad, you understand that it will be like with Volnovakha, the arrow on LDNR is turned. There, after all, pay attention to the video from the tower, the "rockets" went down like a nickname and not one hit the highway. And what will Lukashenko say? Trample on Kiev? I doubt it.
              1. +10
                14 February 2018 18: 38
                Quote: Balu
                And what will Lukashenko say? Trample on Kiev? I doubt it.

                In this I also doubt Balu will not trample, and there is nothing for him to shout either to Kiev or to Lugansk. But dill is quite capable of such meanness, shelling any peacekeepers and blaming it on militias. hiThen God knows how the situation can turn around, Russia will be blamed anyway. hi
                1. +4
                  14 February 2018 18: 42
                  Quote: vlad66
                  Quote: Balu
                  And what will Lukashenko say? Trample on Kiev? I doubt it.

                  In this I also doubt Balu will not trample, and there is nothing for him to shout either to Kiev or to Lugansk. But dill is quite capable of such meanness, shelling any peacekeepers and blaming it on militias. hiThen God knows how the situation can turn around, Russia will be blamed anyway. hi

                  At the same time, a decision has already been made to introduce foreign troops into the territory of Bandera in connection with three large-scale exercises in 2018.
                  So there is only one option left - the introduction of Russian troops, or at least the CSTO in an amount comparable to the army. Russia will not abandon ours, it will cover it from all sides, and it will cover villains if it is not so.
                  1. +9
                    14 February 2018 18: 55
                    Quote: Balu
                    So there is only one option left - the introduction of Russian troops, or at least the CSTO in an amount comparable to the army. Russia will not abandon ours, it will cover it from all sides, and it will cover villains if it is not so.

                    And there will be nowhere to go Yes Either we lose face and everything and everyone turns away from us or we cover the republics, there is no third way. And then we won’t get away with our concerns. hi
                  2. +1
                    15 February 2018 04: 02
                    CSTO will not support. Only Russia remains. It’s like with the Crimea - everything is on the sidelines.
              2. +3
                14 February 2018 18: 38
                No, he has an agreement with Russia.
        4. +5
          14 February 2018 19: 39
          they can only stop the beating of some farm.

          Even so. And this is a good thing.
      4. +3
        14 February 2018 18: 11
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        There was already a report on the zombie man.
        a mandate for peacekeepers should be issued by the UN Security Council. After that, the corresponding decision should be made by the President of Belarus

        Everything is within the legal framework.

        Hi Pash, peacekeepers from Belarus are just like a joke about the whole from Georgia, 50 people, Japanese, as you learn to bargain with the Jews. )))))))))
      5. 0
        14 February 2018 21: 42
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        There was already a report on the zombie man.
        a mandate for peacekeepers should be issued by the UN Security Council. After that, the corresponding decision should be made by the President of Belarus

        Everything is within the legal framework.

        One .on significant contradiction- Minsk is the place of conclusion of the Minsk agreement between the conflicting parties of Ukraine. There is no introduction of peacekeepers. Such a statement of Belarus is nothing more than disavowing its own proposal to use its territory for an agreement.
        The former chairman of the collective farm does not behave respectably.
    2. +2
      14 February 2018 17: 05
      We have a peacekeeping company with a staff of 100

      The estimated number of peacekeepers is estimated at 10 thousand. Poroshenko-Turchinov clowns claimed up to 40 thousand. Belarusians are slightly small
      1. +6
        14 February 2018 17: 27
        Quote: Chertt
        The estimated number of peacekeepers is estimated at 10 thousand. Poroshenko-Turchinov clowns claimed up to 40 thousand. Belarusians are slightly small

        So as far as I understand, Kiev is not waiting for Belarusians. Under the guise of peacekeepers, NATO troops and all affairs will enter.
        1. +2
          14 February 2018 17: 44
          Quote: Pirogov
          So as far as I understand, Kiev is not waiting for Belarusians. Under the guise of peacekeepers, NATO troops and all affairs will enter.

          What official Kiev is actually waiting for is very difficult to imagine, almost impossible. laughing
          1. +2
            14 February 2018 18: 02
            Quote: Chertt
            What official Kiev is actually waiting for is very difficult to imagine, almost impossible.

            What is there to assume, when everything goes to the deployment of NATO troops under the sauces of peacekeepers, at least do not fool yourself. Other options unfortunately will remain options.
            1. +1
              14 February 2018 18: 12
              Quote: Pirogov
              What is there to assume when everything goes to NATO troops

              Without the agreed decision of the LDNR-Russia, the entry of NATO troops into the territory of the People's Republics is technically impossible. Europeans will not storm the position of LDNR
        2. +2
          14 February 2018 18: 17
          Quote: Pirogov
          Quote: Chertt
          The estimated number of peacekeepers is estimated at 10 thousand. Poroshenko-Turchinov clowns claimed up to 40 thousand. Belarusians are slightly small

          So as far as I understand, Kiev is not waiting for Belarusians. Under the guise of peacekeepers, NATO troops and all affairs will enter.

          They will be included in the framework of 3 large-scale exercises on land, air and at sea in 2018, if something dramatically does not happen in Bandera, such as spring.
        3. 0
          14 February 2018 21: 43
          Quote: Pirogov
          Quote: Chertt
          The estimated number of peacekeepers is estimated at 10 thousand. Poroshenko-Turchinov clowns claimed up to 40 thousand. Belarusians are slightly small

          So as far as I understand, Kiev is not waiting for Belarusians. Under the guise of peacekeepers, NATO troops and all affairs will enter.

          Without Donbass, no peacekeepers will move. Otherwise, this is the intervention that Russia will stop.
    3. +3
      14 February 2018 17: 07
      Well, they will approve, they will not approve, the question is separate, and this option of peacekeepers is quite normal. I’m far from thinking that Belarusian peacekeepers will shoot at LDN fighters at the request of kaklobanderov! negative
      1. +3
        14 February 2018 17: 22
        here the matter is in the very formulation of the question .. well, they will catch in the Amazonian indigenous people, the Swedes will be pulled up and other "independent" ... a red-black banderlog will shoot a dozen or two and blame the militias ... with all the consequences ... if you enter, then only demarcation line, and then without provocations will not do
    4. +2
      14 February 2018 17: 13
      If they begin to send to the border of Donbass and Russia then the Belarusians will be “ordered" to go there.
      1. +4
        14 February 2018 17: 29
        I think that Belarusians will be excluded from the list at all from Kuev’s filing .. I was surprised how the mattress guogu mentioned them.
        1. +2
          14 February 2018 18: 28
          In general, this idea with peacekeepers is nothing more than an attempt by the Kremlin to get off this topic beautifully and forget Novorossia as a nightmare that has prevented them from quietly making their gesheft for the fourth year. The only strange thing is that they are so naive and believe that Bandera and the West will forget about Crimea after that. I wonder why it would be so naive? Unclear. And about the Belarusians, the enthusiasm is premature. If only because it became clear to them: the Russian Federation lost its war for Ukraine and its own sovereign future not in words but in deeds. You can pretend for a long time that Putin outplayed everyone there, thrown bonnets into the air and threw angry comments, saying that we will show them everything there and everything else, but objective reality says the opposite. It would be logical to assume. what is called Allies of the Russian Federation will prefer to side with the winners. And there were plenty of calls to this from Minsk, and from Astana, and from Yerevan, and even from Bishkek.
          1. +3
            15 February 2018 12: 49
            in your opinion, let's choose a pony, go back to the 90s and there will be happiness? the main thing is again the geyropa and phashington will become friends again, and the banderlogs will wipe their legs .. is this an option for you? regular home viewers-2 ......
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
    5. 0
      14 February 2018 18: 36
      Here, the campaign with the cap above is the main one for questions. laughing
  2. Imh
    +3
    14 February 2018 17: 01
    How do some people like to say, “who invited them there?”
    1. +8
      14 February 2018 17: 04
      How do some people like to say, “who invited them there?”
      Enviously? Would you like to participate? Welkam. With knowledge of the language and local customs - everything is better than the Swedes.
    2. +2
      14 February 2018 17: 06
      We calculate possible events
    3. +9
      14 February 2018 17: 06
      And the rest with a pork snout, nothing personal. hi
    4. +5
      14 February 2018 17: 10
      better go to the crying wall, talk to her
      1. +3
        14 February 2018 17: 19
        Quote: Not Liberoid Russian
        better go to the crying wall, talk to her

        Colleague, do not forget that the Russians are the most friendly and respectful people. bully
        1. +2
          14 February 2018 17: 37
          I am Russian, not Russian ... Russians are Tajik, Uzbek and Caucasus))))
          1. 0
            14 February 2018 18: 19
            Quote: Not a liberoid Russian
            I am Russian, not Russian ... Russians are Tajik, Uzbek and Caucasus))))

            and you become a Tatar separatist? )))))
            1. +1
              14 February 2018 18: 21
              think it's witty? for me it’s so stupid and stupid from a series of Petrosyans and
              1. +1
                14 February 2018 18: 27
                Quote: Not a liberoid Russian
                think it's witty? for me it’s so stupid and stupid from a series of Petrosyans and

                no, I think this is logical, if the Tatzhik with the Uzbeks are Russians, then the Tatars with the Chukchi are Russian
    5. +7
      14 February 2018 17: 13
      Quote: IMH
      How do some people like to say, “who invited them there?”

      And without them, just a shake of air. Brothers, I respect them.
    6. +2
      14 February 2018 18: 01
      Quote: IMH
      How do some people like to say, “who invited them there?”

      Oh, again, connoisseurs of the beautiful, but alien, came from Israel! Well, without you they won’t understand! Where are we on the fifth floor, you know better from the basement! request
    7. 0
      14 February 2018 18: 16
      Quote: IMH
      How do some people like to say, “who invited them there?”

      for sure! Egyptians need to go there - they will run from everyone or shoot at all
    8. +2
      14 February 2018 18: 18
      Quote: IMH
      How do some people like to say, “who invited them there?”

      No one will definitely call polygonal ones, there are enough of them in Kiev.
  3. +4
    14 February 2018 17: 02
    Let the APU first withdraw its troops to their previous positions, which were determined at the time of signing the Minsk Agreements. And they were carried away by their "toad jumping". Well, then peacekeepers should be put on the demarcation line. This will be the right decision, in my opinion. There is only one question: "what have you already made some decision regarding the introduction of "peacekeepers or Belarus, as always, however, runs ahead of the rest?"
    1. 0
      14 February 2018 22: 42
      Quote: Romanych.by
      Let the APU first withdraw its troops to their previous positions, which were determined at the time of signing the Minsk Agreements.

      So there Debaltseve will then be a stumbling block (at the time of signing, control Ukraine)
      By the way, neither side will take it, it is fraught with the loss of territory. No papers and oral assurances ceased to be worth something after 2014
      Quote: Romanych.by
      Belarus, as always, however, runs ahead of the rest? "

      responded to the information request.
  4. +1
    14 February 2018 17: 06
    Quote: IMH
    How do some people like to say, “who invited them there?”

    Again, it’s all up to you: who invited, who will pay ...? What strange stuffing? Read the article carefully and do not ask stupid questions. Or do you have no one to talk to?
    1. +1
      14 February 2018 18: 59
      Quote: Romanych.by
      Again, it’s all up to you: who invited, who will pay ...?

      I suspect that in this case, our colleague from Israel is not just curious Yes
      Rabinovich reads an article in a sports magazine: "... and then the Italian club paid Maradone three million dollars."
      - Izya! He shouts to his son, “that from morning till night do you sit over your tasks?” I would go to the yard and play football, like all normal children! fellow
  5. +1
    14 February 2018 17: 09
    100 people?
    NATO members want to introduce 20))
    1. BVS
      +4
      14 February 2018 17: 18
      I’ll clarify - “Recall that earlier the former NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said that an international peacekeeping contingent could be sent to the Donbass from states that are not in military blocs, as well as from a regional country.”
      So, "NATO members want to introduce 20" is a fake, because NATO is a military bloc.
      And the participation of the Belarusian peacekeepers, also “Wishlist”, since Belarus is a regional country and is a member of the military bloc - the CSTO.
  6. +2
    14 February 2018 17: 53
    From a statement by Andrei Ravkov (quoted by tyt.by):
    We have a peacekeeping company, the number of people 100 people, 50 - permanent, 50 - variables. But the decision should be made by the UN Security Council, the country to which this company is being taken, and the country that sends it. We still have a decision to make the president. In addition, peacekeepers will have to sign a written consent. Subject to these conditions, we are ready to complete the task.

    And the side of the conflict - LDN you are not interested in?
    Nobody is going to ask her opinions?
    Unclear.
  7. +1
    14 February 2018 18: 08
    In Mongolia, strong peacekeepers, by the way.
    1. +2
      14 February 2018 18: 20
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      In Mongolia, strong peacekeepers, by the way.

      Yes, I have seen. Did they participate in tank biathlon?
      1. +2
        14 February 2018 18: 38
        On June 3, 2017, at the training ground of the 016th motorized rifle brigade of the armed forces of Mongolia, all-army tank competitions "Tank Biathlon-2017" were held. The competition was attended by 8 teams. A ticket to the World Tank Biathlon Championship in the framework of the international army games "ARMI-2017", won first place team of the 167th motorized rifle regiment.https: //bmpd.livejournal.com/2648147.html? commen
        tshttps:
  8. +1
    14 February 2018 18: 31
    CSTO members will by no means get into peacekeeping a priori. Therefore, by the cash register. Words are not mine but matrsnikov.
  9. +1
    14 February 2018 18: 43
    For peacekeepers to come in, the cessation of hostilities and the withdrawal of the warring parties must first take place. But this is not. How to achieve this.
  10. 0
    14 February 2018 18: 44
    Quote: dgonni
    CSTO members will by no means get into peacekeeping a priori. Therefore, by the cash register. Words are not mine but matrsnikov.

    Well then, the Chinese and Indians.
  11. 0
    14 February 2018 19: 16
    Camouflage shako cool
  12. 0
    14 February 2018 21: 18
    We have a peacekeeping company, the number of staff is 100 people, 50 are permanent, 50 are variable.
    These forces are not enough to carry out such a task. If there is a solution, then obviously one of the brigades will have to be turned into a "peacekeeping"
  13. 0
    14 February 2018 21: 54
    We will remind that earlier the former NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen stated that an international peacekeeping contingent from the states could be sent to the Donbass, who are not in military blocks, as well as from a regional country. In particular, it was about the possible composition of such a contingent from the military of Belarus, Sweden and even Brazil.

    So Belarus is located in a military bloc — this military bloc is called the CSTO.)
    But Belarus is also a country of this region — a regional country — which is true.
    And here it is-
    From a statement by Andrei Ravkov (quoted by tyt.by):
    We have a peacekeeping company, the number of people 100 people, 50 - permanent, 50 - variables. But the decision should be made by the UN Security Council, the country to which this company is being taken, and the country that sends it. We still have a decision to make the president. In addition, peacekeepers will have to sign a written consent. Subject to these conditions, we are ready to complete the task.
    -right. Moreover, I would also add-document on the video and how a duplicate is a video proof to hang on the UN wall. So that everyone in the UN can come up and turn on and watch this video-proof.
  14. 0
    14 February 2018 22: 35
    No. Donbass and Lugansk region must enter their borders. Now there are no obstacles and consequences for this.
    1. +1
      14 February 2018 22: 45
      Quote: weddu
      No. Donbass and Lugansk region must enter their borders. Now there are no obstacles and consequences for this.

      Duc and push them, even determined the status ... There is no alternative to Minsk (s).
      To its borders only as an area of ​​a unitary state. Only 1/3 in status. But this will not happen yet ... there are no conditions
  15. 0
    15 February 2018 12: 40
    Quote: 210ox
    , from slurred politics in the Kremlin.

    Are you saying that Russia is a party to the conflict? What is responsible for military operations in the Donbass? Congratulations, you are repeating for Poroshenko. He has long wanted to drag Russia.
  16. 0
    15 February 2018 14: 31
    When Uncle Vova said that he was not against the Russian peacekeepers with us, then the “Western partners” run their throats together and shut their mouths. What have they composed now? Nobody will give them the border, they will stand on the demarcation line and spit on the ceiling.
  17. 0
    15 February 2018 15: 42
    NATO and the peacekeeping contingent ?????
    What is this "glitches" ???
    Russia and LDNR hope to agree to the introduction of a peacekeeping contingent from the North Korean armed forces (UN member) !!!!!
    There is a suggestion, vote !!!!!
  18. 0
    16 February 2018 10: 44
    Quote: assa67
    still hooked ... you Dima need to learn that your "hell" can settle down only with their own hands ... good luck in masturbation

    Yes, how could I tell you ... I made a curious observation. When you press the Putinist against the wall with facts, then when there is nothing to answer, he turns into an inadequate rabid dog, which begins to carry an outright blizzard, often contrary to any logic.