Germany saw what Angela Merkel is ready to save her power

16
February 7 "great coalition" of the conservative bloc of the CDU / CSU and the Social Democrats from the SPD after difficult negotiations came to an agreement on the formation of the German government. It happened, as they say, on the checkbox, when the time allotted by the German law for this procedure has practically expired. The burghers are satisfied that the protracted government crisis is happily resolved and they have to wait for another formality: the approval of the coalition government agreement by all members of the SPD, which should take place in the form of voting by mail.





How Martin Schulz and Sigmar Gabriel Quarreled

This blissful picture the very next day was destroyed by a scandal in the camp of the Social Democrats. One of the party leaders, the German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel, accused his colleague, the chairman of the SPD, Martin Schulz, of violating the “gentlemen's agreement” on the distribution of posts in the government.

It was on the eve of elections to the Bundestag. Then Gabriel (the most popular politician not only among Social Democrats, but also in the whole of Germany) gave Schultz the presidency of the SPD and the right to nominate the candidate for chancellor of the FRG. In exchange for this, as the German media wrote, citing unofficial sources, Gabriel was promised to keep him the post of Minister of Foreign Affairs.

It was not just an agreement between two personalities. She was actually endorsed by the Social Democrats party bosses. Therefore, not only Sigmar Gabriel was surprised by the statement of Martin Schulz that Schultz himself would head the German Foreign Ministry in the new composition of the coalition government. After all, earlier the leader of the Social Democrats said more than once that "he does not intend to work in the government under the leadership of Angela Merkel."

The very next day after the statement of Schulz, Sigmar Gabriel in an interview with the German media concern Funke Mediengruppe “spilled out all his anger and contempt” addressed to the chairman of the Social Democratic Party of Germany. So local commentators appreciated Gabriel's public outrage at the behavior of his party colleague.

Gabriel reproached Schultz that he "did not keep his word." The scandal, which had sharply gained momentum, quickly turned into a latent inner-party discussion, in order to blow up an information bomb on February 9. Martin Schulz made a new statement in which he refused the post of German Foreign Minister and announced his intention to resign on March 2 from the post of SPD chairman.

“I announce the refusal of the post in the federal government and fervently hope that the debate within the party will end there,” Schultz made a special press statement. - We are all engaged in politics for people in this country. This includes the fact that my ambitions should stand below the interests of the party. ”

The Germans didn’t like the loud internal party discussion in the SPD with the carving of government posts. The Social Democrats' rating fell to a record low. This was recorded on Monday, February 12, by the newspaper Bild, which published data from an actual survey of the Insa Institute of Sociological Research. According to them, only 16,5% of German voters are ready today to vote for the SPD. (Recall that in the last election this party received the lowest result in its stories - 20,5% votes.)

It is noteworthy that five days ago, Martin Schulz felt like a winner. He bargained with Angela Merkel already six ministerial posts. Exactly the same number of portfolios in the new cabinet were received by the Christian Democrats from the CDU, who actually won the autumn elections to the Bundestag.

The high price for the fourth term Merkel

However, the matter is not even in quantity, but as ministerial portfolios inherited by social democrats. The first in importance in this series is the foreign policy department. It is traditionally given to the party - the junior partner in the government coalition. This post provides high popularity to its owner, and at the same time - the party he represents.

However, the main place in the German government hierarchy is still the Ministry of Finance. In recent years (from 2009 to 2017), he was led by “the second person in the CDU”, Wolfgang Schäuble. By his diligence, the methods of German financial management, attitudes towards state debt and resources have become the norm for the European Union. In Europe, the voice of the German minister was largely decisive.

After the autumn elections, Wolfgang Schäuble led the Bundestag. The ministerial chair was vacant for many months, and now the representative of the SPD should occupy it. The Germans understand that this will be a person with different social views on the role of finance in the state, and where he will lead the country - it remains only to guess.

The Christian Democrats were shocked at the decision to give the Ministry of Finance to the Social Democrats. Angela Merkel tried to justify herself, that in order to get out of the protracted government crisis, “painful concessions” were required for the coalition partners. But the Germans have already made a conclusion for themselves: Merkel did not save the coalition, but sacrificed party positions to preserve his power.

This is evidenced by the transfer to the Social Democrats of another key department - the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs. He has the largest (almost € 30 billion) budget among other ministries of the German government, and, therefore, the greatest opportunities to influence domestic politics and public sentiment.

The concessions of Merkel led to the fact that the popularity of the whole self-named “great coalition” had fallen. The already mentioned survey of the Insa Institute showed that if the elections were held today, only 46 percent of voters would vote for the CDU / CSU and SPD blocs. This is clearly not up to the creation of a parliamentary majority.

The high price for the fourth term Merkel forced to justify not only the acting. Chancellor, but also her fellow party members. The senior member of the CDU and the European Union budget commissioner Günther Oettinger publicly spoke for his leader. He explained that the protracted government crisis made Germany "partially capable" in world and European affairs. He had to go out.

In turn, critics of Merkel noted that the Germans had accumulated irritation not only because the Bundeskanzlerin had delayed the formation of the government. She could not present a large-scale project uniting the nation to the country. This time Ottinger did not find any other arguments besides the statement that Angela Merkel is “a strong politician who will meet the expectations of the party and the public.”

Meanwhile, all the concessions and efforts of Merkel gave so far only an intermediate result. February 20 will begin the so-called “mail vote” 464 of thousands of members of the Social Democratic Party on the coalition issue with the CDU / CSU bloc. It will last until March 2, and March 4 will sum it up.

This is not a formal procedure. Today, no one can predict the result of the “postal voting”. It is obvious that many in the SPD are opposed to the "great coalition." Since cooperation with the CDU / CSU bloc in the latest cabinet of ministers of the Federal Republic of Germany has already brought social democrats serious image losses and has pushed most of the electorate away from them.

Therefore, the heads of the largest regional branches of the SPD opposed entering the new coalition. Among them is the leader of the Moscow Social Democrats, Michael Muller. The youth wing of the SPD (Jusos), led by Kevin Kuenert, is particularly active today. Jusos agitators drive through the lands of Germany and call party members to vote against the “great coalition.”

All this creates an extremely confusing situation, fraught with the most unexpected decisions. Experts estimate the further fate of the coalition with a probability of "fifty-fifty" and remind that very few of the chancellors of modern Germany have safely completed their political career.

Angela Merkel does not hear experts, she is determined to enter a new term of government. On Sunday’s Berlin direkt on the ZDF channel, Merkel said bluntly that she was going to work until the next 2021 election of the year: “I ran for four years. I promised people these four years, and I am one of those people who keep promises. ”

We will wait for what else Angela Merkel will go to realize her undiminished ambitions and remain in power. The fate of her counterpart - Martin Schulz was decided on Tuesday. The presidency and the SPD 13 board of February accepted the resignation of Schulz and appointed the first burgomaster of Hamburg, Olaf Scholz, acting chairman of the party, adding a new intrigue to the prolonged crisis.

In this regard, German political analysts have suggested that now "Germany is on the threshold of the Italian situation with frequent changes of government and regular early elections." This will be the saddest result of the long reign of Angela Merkel.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +21
    14 February 2018 06: 24
    Ushat Europe
    tolerant
    1. +2
      14 February 2018 09: 48
      Quote: squeeze
      Ushat Europe
      tolerant

      I think that's where the elections were rigged.
      1. +7
        14 February 2018 15: 48
        If only the strip did not show. Foul of last hope.
    2. 0
      14 February 2018 18: 08
      It seems that in Germany, the men were transferred. winked
  3. +4
    14 February 2018 07: 27
    Meanwhile, all the concessions and efforts of Merkel have so far yielded only an intermediate result.

    The old Fuhrer clings with an old bony hand for any straw! bully
    1. +1
      14 February 2018 09: 28
      ... well so - Snow White has become a Witch already - it's time to bring down ...
    2. +1
      14 February 2018 18: 09
      For whom is old, but for Macron is young! lol
  4. +4
    14 February 2018 09: 41
    I'm one of those people who keep promises
    Especially US data. What could be perfectly observed the last 4 years. Before the light bulb, German business, losses from sanctions, most importantly, in unison with the Americans.
  5. 0
    14 February 2018 09: 50
    She is a politician, a representative of one of the oldest professions!
    Nothing new ... and this is not our choice, let alone, ourselves.
  6. +1
    14 February 2018 10: 00
    for some reason, I think that the outcome of the vote largely depends on the prospects of the SPD in the March elections in the lands: if the coalition is risky, then it will never be.
    as for the formation of the Cabinet, then in my opinion a compromise will still be possible, just under the risk of losing seats in the Bundestag for both the CDP / CSU and the SPD in the event of early elections.
  7. +2
    14 February 2018 10: 28
    Photos in the topic:

  8. +2
    14 February 2018 11: 11
    Schultz former drunk without a higher education, the Bundeswehr under the gynecologist, Mrs. Kazmirchak (Merkel, from Polish Jews) ...
  9. +1
    14 February 2018 11: 20
    Sigmar Gabriel accused his colleague, the chairman of the SPD, Martin Schulz, of violating the "gentlemen's agreement" on the distribution of posts in the government.


    How familiar ... One "tagged" in the same way, "in a gentlemanly manner", was promised "not to expand NATO eastward" .... wink
  10. +1
    14 February 2018 13: 27
    Massonka, she does not care about the Germans, she has other masters.
  11. 0
    14 February 2018 17: 01
    so what’s more, more “refugees”, more raped German women. We must somehow assimilate and give European savages.
  12. 0
    15 February 2018 17: 28
    At least some positive news ... Why not smile if our fierce enemies are not comme il faut? When the enemy is uncomfortable, it’s good, and the Germans are filthy creatures, and clearly Russian enemies and enemies are fierce! Do not forget about it!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"