“In one jump” the problem of concluding a peace treaty with Japan cannot be resolved, Lavrov believes

Moscow would like to conclude a peace treaty with Japan on the basis of the 1956 declaration of the year, but understands that this problem cannot be solved “in one jump,” reports Interfax Statement by Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

We would like to conclude a peace treaty, as agreed on in 1956, when the USSR and Japan adopted the Joint Declaration. We proceed from the fact that the solution to any problem, including a peace treaty (and the Japanese directly associate with it the solution to the so-called "question of the four islands," as they call them the "northern territories," but this is the South Kuril ridge) in the most favorable conditions that are created by deepening cooperation between the countries concerned in all spheres without exception - trade, economic, political, humanitarian and international,

Lavrov said on the Russia-1 channel.

We have repeatedly said to our Japanese friends: the very first question that arises when the problem of a peace treaty begins to be discussed is the inviolability of the outcome of the Second World War. Our Japanese colleagues do not recognize the unshakable outcome of the Second World War as regards these four islands,

he explained.

The minister noted that this problem “in one jump” cannot be solved.

But, for example, joint economic activity is already a step towards working together on these same islands,

added on.

Comments

[kolyhalovs]

Why not decide. Only in one jump and decide. Only well, they are in the stump, these "jumps that decide everything." We will live without a contract.

[Father of a Soldier]

The problem of the Kuril Islands was decided by our grandfathers in 1945, and who are we to reconsider something? To do this, go their way. As for Japan, we want to be friends, they want to look at us with a breeze, somehow exactly at them.

[Berber]

The WTO, as it turned out, was not very necessary, but made concessions to partners. In the same way with the Japanese, we can trade and cooperate without a contract.

[electrooleg]

What kind of problem is Lavrov talking about? They lived all the way without any peace treaty and nothing. As if without him we would have a war with Japan. As if having concluded this agreement it will not be guaranteed! Well, the cart!

[cniza]

No, our neighbors solve the problems by jumping, we see them clearly.

[Monos]

Good morning Victor

The minister noted that this problem “in one jump” cannot be solved.

Special Forces of the Moscow Region thinks otherwise.

[assa67]

Victor ... the results of the 2nd World War will not be recognized by hippon-man, and sushi from sweat insoles for breakfast ... here we will take Sev.Korea to the Russian Federation and claim the rights to Honshu or Hokkaido, then they will scratch oneself

[Monos]

Greetings Andrew
It seems to me that the status quo is easier to maintain without any peace treaty.

[assa67]

in fact, we are still with the yellow in a state of war, but because of this, neither they nor us are warm, nor cold ... there are enough other problems, with the same “non-brothers” ... not to mention the striped God's chosen evil

[electrooleg]

I see the special forces already have invisible pants When will the whole costume be?

[Monos]

Quote: elektroleg

I see the special forces already have invisible pants When will the whole costume be?

Actually, there is one photograph embedded in another.

[electrooleg]

And I thought this is the same invisible army that they are looking for and cannot find in the Donbas

[starogil]

Let the goat into the garden, will there be such a jump as in a fairy tale:
- The fox had an ice hut, and the hare had a bast .......
What ended ...... remember?

[siberalt]

Now is not up to the Kuril Islands. The world order is collapsing, and we have to decide others.

[vladimirZ]

The Minister noted that this problem "in one jump" can not be solved. - from article

What's the problem? She is not, because he himself says:

"We have repeatedly told our Japanese friends: the very first question that arises when the problem of a peace treaty begins to be discussed is the inviolability of the outcome of World War II.

What's next to discuss? Why bother negotiating on these issues? Or do they want to “agree” how they “agreed” with China on the direct surrender of our territory, on the planting of treacherous TORs for the gradual tearing away of the territory, as with the TOR in the Far East for the same China?

[Dembel77]

do not recognize the unshakable results of World War II

... if you do not recognize, then it may make sense to repeat everything again ...

[Chestnut]

Prohibit the sale of goods from Japan to Russia until the signing of a peace treaty, will be signed.

[Brushing]

What is a "joint economic activity" ??? This is when our skeleton de jure, and de facto the Japanese host it ???

Here 200-300 km from Moscow, the land is not plowed - call the Japanese and host ....

What kind of manic passion among our rulers is "to develop the land" ??? - If the strength is not enough, then leave it under nature reserves and as a backlog for posterity ....

[Sofa General]

You understand what’s the matter - it’s not enough to stake out the territory. It needs to be defended and protected. Ie the army. The army needs infrastructure, the infrastructure needs people, people need jobs. Logistics, supply - there are a lot of questions. And if you don’t have this, then sooner or later the neighbors will “present” you. What is actually happening now.

[Mar.Tirah]

How much it would be desirable for all this American court pack that we would have the time of tagging! When the spitting lightly, the Minister of Foreign Affairs gave away territories comparable to large states, and he did not bear any responsibility. . And I hope never to return.

[Alex-a832]

The United States is present in this "love triangle", which fuels the idea of ​​the imaginary national pride of the Japanese. If the United States were removed from the equation, then Japan would have reconciled with the departure of the Kuril Islands to Russia, they would have signed an agreement and lived on. Maybe they would get the Kuril Islands on a long-term lease. The presence or absence of a contract is violet for us if this does not solve the issue of expelling Amer bases from the Japanese islands.

[Elevator in the building]

Question: Why do we need this "peace treaty", and even on their terms? All you need to know about Japan - they are enemies and murderers who hatched the plans of the genocide of our people, and even not repented; such an enemy once is an enemy forever. And if something happened, they will also continue their "competition" in chopping off their heads and inhumane experiments.

[Sofa expert]

We can give a hole from a donut and from a dead donkey ears to the collar =) I have a whole kilogram of holes from bagels =) who has dead donkey ears? Let's throw off the whole country and ship to Russia by mail =) (the motto of the post of Russia: your package should be long-awaited =))

[rotmistr60]

I don’t know how many “jumps” were going to solve this issue, but I know one thing - if we give in to the Japanese at least a little, then a crowd of people wishing to chop off something from Russia will stand in line.

[Sofa General]

Actually, the line is already standing ...

[Gardamir]

Well, how many Lavrov wants to make jumps to give the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin? Just in a few leaps we were deprived of the Union and lured into capitalism. The first leap for socialism with a human face, then for socialism with a market face, for market socialism, for the market. We did not have time to look back, but we have the bestial grin of capitalism!

[vlad66]

Quote: Gardamir

Well, how many Lavrov wants to make jumps to give the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin?

Here is one jump for you

Russian military aircraft will be based on the Iturup Island of the Kuril Ridge along with civil aviation, the corresponding order has already been signed by Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev. Iturup Island - one of the four southern Kuril Islands, whose membership Japan is trying to challenge

How will you give it to the airspace base and the Civil Airport? You haven’t tried to think with your head. And not scream slogans.

[assa67]

Quote: vladimirZ

The Minister noted that this problem cannot be solved “in one jump”

Vlad, welcome jump, then another, and more ... are we on the Maidan? ... we will become like horses? ...

Quote: Dembel 77

do not recognize the unshakable results of World War II

by reinforcing the Far East Military District and Pacific Fleet, it is necessary to hamper the hippon-man that these results are not subject to discussion

[Gardamir]

Do not scream slogans.

the slogans are your part. the main thing is to start first

But, for example, joint economic activity is already a step towards working together on these same islands,

[Alf]

Quote: vlad66

How will you give it to the base of the aerospace forces and the civilian airport?

For money. As labeled passed the GDR - and a billion marks somewhere evaporated and the GDR was gone.

[Sofa expert]

Quote: Gardamir

Well, how many Lavrov wants to make jumps to give the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin? Just in a few leaps we were deprived of the Union and lured into capitalism. The first leap for socialism with a human face, then for socialism with a market face, for market socialism, for the market. We did not have time to look back, but we have the bestial grin of capitalism!

How did the representatives of capitalism get the kids .. I’ll save no .. especially by phone .. they call every 3 minutes .. I don’t know how to send them to hell .. I sent them directly, I turn around .. tired of

[vlad66]

Quote: Sofa Expert

I don’t know how to send them to hell anymore .. I sent them directly, I turn around .. I'm tired

A Good Way for a Colleague to Descend Checked, the desire to return does not arise from them.

[Aleks2048]

Or maybe there is no problem. In my opinion, the problem of the islands is the problem of Japan, and as long as they do not solve it at home, the Russian Federation has no problems. The only thing that needs to be done is to withdraw the idea expressed by the USSR that we will return the islands in exchange for a peace treaty and linkage with American territories.

[Lexus]

Jumpers are very much appreciated in the neighboring land. I believe that Lavrov should stop engaging in verbiage, and take care of the fate of the abducted and illegally imprisoned Russian citizens (Bout, Yaroshenko and many others).

[Loess]

We have repeatedly told our Japanese friends: the very first question that arises when the problem of a peace treaty begins to be discussed is the inviolability of the outcome of World War II.

In other words - figs to you, and not "Kemsk volost".

[Ural resident]

First, political, economic interaction, the removal of Americans from Japan, the conclusion of an agreement on peace and friendship, participation in humanitarian projects, and even then as a bonus - joint economic activity, but not the other way around - after their "economic activity" we will have nothing to do there

[- = ANTRAX = -]

did the Foreign Ministry swallow this bait? but nothing that one of the Japanese parties also requires half of Sakhalin?

[Ber]

“In one jump” the problem of concluding a peace treaty with Japan cannot be resolved, Lavrov believes

As long as there are no American bases in Japan, there will be no peace treaty, the country is occupied, what they say in Washington, Japan will sign with respect to Russia.
In other regions there may be freedom of Japan in decision-making, but not with Russia.

[Ivan__Pomidorov]

Everything suits us, let the Japanese offer us reasonable compensation for the return of small islands.
Only they are not able to offer anything worthy of attention.