Pentagon: Russia prevents us from defeating terrorists in Syria

February 12 2018 71

The US military stated that (who) interferes with the coalition led by the United States "to finally defeat the terrorists" in Syria. According to the representative of the Pentagon, this factor is (attention!) Russia. In the report of the Inspector General of the US Department of Defense, referenced Russia TodayIt says that it is the Russian military presence in Syria that “prevents the United States from fighting terrorists.”

The Pentagon says that Russian pilots "allow dangerous maneuvers near American combat aircraft."

From the material:

Such actions of Russia provoke the risk of inadvertently opening fire.

The US Department of Defense stated that they were “extremely worried” by statements by Moscow that the US should complete the operation in Syria after US President Trump announced the 100% release of the SAR and Iraq from ISIL (* banned in the Russian Federation). The Pentagon believes that such statements are "unacceptable", since this "is the pressure on the American coalition."

If the United States for the final defeat of terrorists in Syria is hampered by the Russian military presence, then it is interesting that (who) in this case prevents the Pentagon from defeating the terrorists, for example, in Afghanistan, where the NATO military contingent has been located since 2002 year?

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Alex_Rarog

+3

12 February 2018 07: 14

They are not tired of whining? Nobody called them there ... they can go through the forest.
1. vlad66
  
  +7
  
  12 February 2018 09: 34
  Yes Yes It is known that interferes with a bad dancer.
  1. 73bor
    
    0
    
    12 February 2018 17: 41
    
    Single girls in a disco are always looking for dancing guys no matter! And you might think, after seven years with ISIS, everything would be okay without VKS? Do they themselves believe in this? Listening and reading this, you catch yourself thinking - who are the terrorists for the Americans? It seems completely not those whom we mean!
2. sgazeev
  
  +1
  
  12 February 2018 10: 14
  
  Quote: Alex_Rarog
  They are not tired of whining? Nobody called them there ... they can go through the forest.
  
  Impudent from impotence.
Sofa General

+4

12 February 2018 07: 14

Without words...
Terrorists cover terrorists well, or ",,, Cuckoo praises a rooster for praising a cuckoo" (c)
Herculesic

+4

12 February 2018 07: 15

Well, it’s just the planet-wide bad dancers whom I or someone always interfere!
1. Uncle lee
  
  +4
  
  12 February 2018 07: 18
  
  what (who) in this case interferes with the Pentagon
  - a bad dancer, you know what is in the way!
  1. mihey
    
    0
    
    12 February 2018 11: 36
    
    moreover, these dancers cannot understand: right to left or left to right ...
2. Sirocco
  
  +2
  
  12 February 2018 07: 36
  
  Quote: Herkulesich
  Well, just plain planet bad dancers,
  
  I recalled a joke on this subject, and about these characters.
  Two cowboys are coming, suddenly one saw the toilet and says to the other:
  - Wait here, I'm fast.
  An hour passes, the second, the third, but he is still gone. Well, the second one decided
  look in. He enters the toilet and hears a voice:
  - Quiet Joe, someone is holding me by the balls.
  “Donald, your mother, you would have stepped on your ears!”
  And here also, although this fake is as always designed for the internal consumer of the NATO bloc.
3. Berber
  
  0
  
  12 February 2018 08: 55
  
  Many thought about eggs and a dancer. My first thought is the same too.
Mar.Tirah

0

12 February 2018 07: 15

Well, let's say, not to defeat, but to change, and on the fly. For a new fight with Assad.
rotmistr60

+2

12 February 2018 07: 15

As usual, from a sick head to a healthy one. They themselves understand that their "ears" stick out wherever terrorism flourishes. And according to the old habit - they brought everything to Russia, they may not remember you.
Herculesic

+3

12 February 2018 07: 16

And they just came to Syria only to fight, or, as always, supposedly to fight, and along the way and looting both in Libya and in Iraq?
1. bane's jacket
  
  0
  
  12 February 2018 07: 26
  
  Quote: Herkulesich
  And they just came to Syria only to fight, or, as always, supposedly to fight, and along the way and looting both in Libya and in Iraq?
  
  Can looting facts be possible?
  1. Herculesic
    
    +7
    
    12 February 2018 07: 33
    
    You zombies did not see the looting of Iraqi museums by warriors from the United States? And the world’s masterpieces of history and archaeological finds were left in the USA! I am silent about Hussein’s personal golden weapons, as well as about money from Iraqi banks - now look for all this in the USA! There were a lot of scandals about looting a warrior from the USA!
    1. bane's jacket
      
      0
      
      12 February 2018 07: 37
      
      Quote: Herkulesich
      You zombies did not see the looting of Iraqi museums by warriors from the United States?
      
      No, I have not seen it. Will show?
  2. zyzx
    
    +3
    
    12 February 2018 07: 45
    
    And you respected in Google banned? For example, how they robbed the palace of Saddam, the museums of Baghdad.
    1. bane's jacket
      
      0
      
      12 February 2018 07: 52
      
      Quote: zyzx
      And you respected in Google banned? For example, how they robbed the palace of Saddam, the museums of Baghdad.
      
      So show what the problem is?
      1. Alexanast
        
        +4
        
        12 February 2018 08: 49
        
        Quote: bane's jacket
        So show what the problem is?
        
        Yes, you open your eyes ...
        
        bane's jacket
        
        0
        
        12 February 2018 08: 59
        
        Quote: Alexanast
        Quote: bane's jacket
        So show what the problem is?
        
        Yes, you open your eyes ...
        
        And you respected in Google banned?
        
        You zombies did not see the looting of Iraqi museums by warriors from the United States?
        
        looting both in Libya and in Iraq?
        
        So show or not, I do not understand?
      2. Varyag_0711
        
        +8
        
        12 February 2018 08: 58
        
        bane's jacket Today, 07:52 ↑ New
        So show what the problem is?
        Do you need it? Why feed an explicit troll?
        Aw, we got you through Grisha Vinnikov, or what is your name in America now, Greg Weiner seems ...?
        
        bane's jacket
        
        0
        
        12 February 2018 09: 12
        
        Quote: Varyag_0711
        bane's jacket Today, 07:52 ↑ New
        So show what the problem is?
        Do you need it? Why feed an explicit troll?
        
        A troll is that person who asks for confirmation of your words, and you (four) are not able to do this? Well, OK.
        
        Quote: Varyag_0711
        
        Aw, we got you through Grisha Vinnikov, or what is your name in America now, Greg Weiner seems ...?
        
        It would be better if you Google "saw through" in which I was banned.
        
        Varyag_0711
        
        +7
        
        12 February 2018 09: 35
        
        bane's jacket Today, 09:12 ↑
        A troll is that person who asks for confirmation of your words, and you (four) are not able to do this? Well, OK.
        You don’t really need any confirmation, don’t make me laugh. There would be a sane person or he would find, or would really help. But you are not here for this, right? And if so, then why get dirty about you? You are an ordinary, standard, gray troll, with an incomprehensible nickname, without a name, without a flag and without a homeland. There have been a dime a dozen of these recently in VO, one-day ones, which have now been given free rein with the abolition of minuses, so you frolic in full, well, God be your judge, frolic while the wind is without stones ...
        
        bane's jacket
        
        0
        
        12 February 2018 09: 44
        
        Quote: Varyag_0711
        bane's jacket Today, 09:12 ↑
        A troll is that person who asks for confirmation of your words, and you (four) are not able to do this? Well, OK.
        You don’t really need any confirmation, don’t make me laugh. There would be a sane person or he would find, or would really help.
        
        Why not needed? Are needed. I searched and did not find. So help me, teach me how to use Google and "wash" me, what’s the problem I don’t understand?
        What do you think of this time?
        
        Varyag_0711
        
        +6
        
        12 February 2018 09: 56
        
        Not in my habits to feed the trolls! You are not interesting or pleasant to me in order to show you something, or to try to prove something to you. He who has ears to hear, he who has eyes to see, you have neither one nor the other, and you do not need any evidence, you are clearly not looking for the truth here, so why should you indulge?
        You can not strain, I will not answer you in any case. I said you are not interesting to me ...
        
        bane's jacket
        
        0
        
        12 February 2018 10: 15
        
        Quote: Varyag_0711
        Not in my habits to feed the trolls! You are not interesting or pleasant to me in order to show you something, or to try to prove something to you. He who has ears to hear, he who has eyes to see, you have neither one nor the other, and you do not need any evidence, you are clearly not looking for the truth here, so why should you indulge?
        You can not strain, I will not answer you in any case. I said you are not interesting to me ...
        
        I’ll make a note about you: "a person who is not responsible for his words." Farewell.
        
        stasisto
        
        +1
        
        12 February 2018 10: 20
        
        I am not a troll, but uninteresting and unpleasant it is written together, because it is a new word, but there is no opposition.
  3. Grits
    
    0
    
    12 February 2018 12: 43
    
    Can looting facts be possible?
    Can. I think that you drive gasoline, the basis of which was oil extracted in the form of looting in Iraq, and even more so for you, the French, in Libya. This is exactly a fact.
    1. bane's jacket
      
      0
      
      12 February 2018 12: 52
      
      Quote: Gritsa
      Can looting facts be possible?
      Can. I think that you drive gasoline, the basis of which was oil extracted in the form of looting in Iraq, and even more so for you, the French, in Libya. This is exactly a fact.
      
      Actually, it was about
      You have not seen the zombie looting museums of Iraq by fighters from the usa?
      
      Can you show these "facts" from a zombie creator? Four comrades did not succeed.
      About gasoline and oil from it, it sounded really cool.
      FAMILY - a war crime of an international nature, consisting in the abduction on the battlefield of things that are with the dead and wounded, including robbery of the inhabitants of enemy territory.
      
      Gas "on which I drive," as I understand it - from oil taken from enemy territory from residents?
antiamerican

0

12 February 2018 07: 20

"partners"
and Russia continues to buy Amer treasure
1. raw174
  
  +1
  
  12 February 2018 09: 43
  
  Quote: antiamerikan
  and Russia continues to buy Amer treasure
  
  the word is what newfangled))) And they buy engines for rockets from us. War is war, and money is money ...
2. Nyrobsky
  
  +2
  
  12 February 2018 11: 12
  
  Quote: antiamerikan
  "partners"
  and Russia continues to buy Amer treasure
  
  First, "Russia" is capitalized. Secondly, dozens of countries buy American securities. Thirdly, Nepal, Bhutan, Somalia and dozens of other countries do not buy American securities. just nothing. There are countries that are actively striving for the level of Somalia, such as Urkaina, which generally does not buy anything, but simply borrow and sell it in bulk and retail.
  1. mihey
    
    0
    
    12 February 2018 11: 41
    
    How could you crumble a loaf on an anti-American? Horror of what's going on
lance

+4

12 February 2018 07: 23

it depends on what (whom) the Pentagon considers terrorists: illegal armed formations of all stripes of local rascals or the Assad government chosen by the majority of the people. maybe it's time to admit in the us that the pentagon is the planet's main terrorist
seregatara1969

+2

12 February 2018 07: 32

Russia's actions provoke the risk of inadvertent opening of fire.

inadvertently only a bunch can be made
Alex-a832

+1

12 February 2018 07: 33

Something is not noticeable activity striped in the territory under their control in terms of the extermination of terrorists. At the same time, neither Russia nor the CAA are present in these areas. Or do ours cause them paralysis if they are closer than 1000 km? Well, tady chupa-chups amerikosam on the cheek, so as not to whine.
1. stasisto
  
  0
  
  12 February 2018 10: 16
  
  Male paralysis.
  1. Kondratko
    
    0
    
    12 February 2018 17: 13
    
    Brief, instructive advice, not a Russian language teacher?
    
    We are waiting for Yesho, errors on the site are a dime a dozen. )
    PS Some people type text on a tablet, and not on a full-size keyboard, for some people their fingers may look like a sausage and fall into a small letter on the screen - a space.
    Make a discount on this, you will not need to post the same and uninformative messages, especially off-topic, which falls into the "flood" category.
Mountain shooter

+1

12 February 2018 07: 34

And it depends on who is considered terrorists! If, as the striped ears really want, to declare the legitimate president a terrorist, then yes, they still interfere.
askort154

+1

12 February 2018 07: 37

Only RT and Sputnik cannot win the information war. There are many Syrians in Europe now. It is necessary to create protest groups from them so that they regularly hold protests at the US embassies in Europe, demanding the withdrawal of Americans from Syria, since they are there illegally. This is the only way to force the Western media to change the "white helmets" record. In Soviet times, they did just that.
1. raw174
  
  +1
  
  12 February 2018 09: 46
  
  Quote: askort154
  There are many Syrians in Europe now. It is necessary to create protest groups from them,
  
  Most likely, a significant part of the Syrians in Europe are not loyal to Assad, and therefore to us. And there are not so many Syrians there ...
2. Grits
  
  +1
  
  12 February 2018 12: 48
  
  There are many Syrians in Europe now. It is necessary to create protest groups from them so that they regularly hold protests at the US embassies in Europe,
  Did you see these Syrians a couple of years ago on all TV screens? Didn't notice that they are all waving the SSA flag there? Therefore, what the hell are protest groups. Real Syrians protect their home from the barmaley, and do not feed from the hands of European pido ..., oh, tolerant.
zyzx

0

12 February 2018 07: 43

Hypocrisy of the highest standard!
Prisoner

0

12 February 2018 07: 48

The p-i-n-dosov have their own idea of terrorism and terrorists. Terrorists for them are those who fight against the bandits they have fed.
KVU-NSVD

+4

12 February 2018 08: 12

Looks like they pinch everything the barmaley can, then the "peacekeepers" whine, then our planes interfere with the coalition. Only the whining of the hegemon somehow immediately suggests thinking about his "hegemony" ..
Alexander War

+1

12 February 2018 08: 22

Add video http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/raqqas
_dirty_secret
1. Alexander War
  
  0
  
  12 February 2018 08: 23
  
  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/raqqas
  _dirty_secret is still there
LeftPers

+1

12 February 2018 08: 26

Pin-do-si they are ping-do-si, as they say, something always interferes with a bad dancer.
Electric

0

12 February 2018 08: 27

so Trumpania seemed to boastfully declared in the Congress Sasha that they had already won all the winners in Syria
prior

0

12 February 2018 08: 35

If Russia is preventing America from crushing the terrorists in Syria, fuck off and don't stop Russia from doing it.
bald

+1

12 February 2018 08: 36

Who is provoking the planes of the coalition? The terrorists do not have an Air Force, but of course we interfere with doing dirty deeds. It is necessary to shoot them down with portable RC (since we do not want to spoil the "relationship").
Vlad Morozov

0

12 February 2018 08: 51

The blockade of pindaus will reduce their presence to meaninglessness!
rpuropuu

0

12 February 2018 08: 51

The US Department of Defense stated that they were “extremely worried” by statements by Moscow that the US should complete the operation in Syria after US President Trump announced the 100% release of the SAR and Iraq from ISIL (* banned in the Russian Federation). The Pentagon believes that such statements are "unacceptable", since this "is the pressure on the American coalition."
Yes, it didn't work out well Therefore, we could say right away: "oh everything"
NKT

0

12 February 2018 08: 57

Here they are "good fellows" guys, act ahead of the curve and do not hesitate to declare any nonsense, and we all calve and calve and express our concern.
Zaurbek

+1

12 February 2018 09: 12

They do not whine, we really interfere with them .... We whine about any x .... It's high time to say the same about them ...
1. NordUral
  
  0
  
  12 February 2018 09: 42
  
  It’s not whining, but the top people are engaged in hating. And in vain, this does not go unpunished. This was confirmed by the events with the Wagnerites. It is not known, unfortunately, what happened there, but you cannot fight an arrogant and powerful enemy the way our guys had to, with practically no cover.
NordUral

0

12 February 2018 09: 39

The Pentagon and State Department vultures howled loudly. We prevent you from fighting your own fosterlings, which ours cut off oxygen. And you will answer for the Wagnerites.
Zaurbek

0

12 February 2018 09: 47

It is necessary to create some kind of loyal Syrian forces (other than the SAR), so that they (in which case) could attack the Coalition. Fine, shoot down the plane or something. And what would be responsible not SAR and not the Russian Federation ...
Robert Rodionov

0

12 February 2018 09: 55

Well, amerikashkam arrogance is not to take, and maybe after all the father of the ISIS is preventing himself from destroying his beloved brainchild? Well, the whole sane world is aware that the US CIA released Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi from Guantanamo to create a terrorist network, well, of course, he was in Guantanamo under a different name.
stasisto

0

12 February 2018 10: 11

Quote: vlad66
Yes Yes It is known that interferes with a bad dancer.

Does Trump have ... eggs in politics?
Kent0001

0

12 February 2018 11: 19

for them it is. for them, terrorists are Assad and pro-government forces. Well, nothing, we will now express our concern about the statements of "partners" who do not hide that THEY are ENEMIES for Russia.
flicker

+2

12 February 2018 11: 49

Pentagon: Russia prevents us from defeating terrorists in Syria
Pendosnya has already begun to parrot.
Ivan.A

0

12 February 2018 11: 51

Well, they can't carry out their plans! So they whine like little children.
Slovak

0

12 February 2018 12: 14

Quote: bane jacket
Quote: Herkulesich
You zombies did not see the looting of Iraqi museums by warriors from the United States?

No, I have not seen it. Will show?

Beads to mark? Second example: Afghan for the USA is a large plantation. They guard the fields and transport them. They need Syria for oil production, first of all. Are you offended for the world democrat and peacemaker?
Pre-cat

0

12 February 2018 12: 27

A few quotes from Goebbels about lying: “The more monstrous the lie, the more willingly the crowd believes in it.”

Source: https://ru.citaty.net/avtory/iozef-gebbels [i] „If you tell a lie big enough and repeat it, people will eventually believe it.

Source: https://ru.citaty.net/avtory/iozef-gebbels/ About USA and England: “The British are known throughout the world for their lack of conscience in politics. They are experts in the art of hiding their crimes behind a facade of decency. They have done this for centuries, and it has become so part of their nature that they themselves no longer notice this feature. They act with such a well-behaved expression and such absolute seriousness that they convince even themselves that they are examples of political innocence. They do not admit to themselves their hypocrisy. Never one Englishman will wink at another and say: "But we understand what we mean." They not only behave like a model of purity and integrity - they believe themselves. It's both funny and dangerous. "

Source: https://ru.citaty.net/avtory/iozef-gebbels//
Ica grew up on what was brought from Europe, and besides, Americans are obsessed with a passion for money; so they are trying to take possession of the results of scientific research and creativity here, without paying a cent for it. They have only one decent opera house in the whole country - the Metropolitan Opera, and even that is closed, and their leaders still have the audacity to declare that we (and in our person - European culture) threaten them! They are dragging their people to savagery! Meanwhile, we have to live with them in this crazy world! "

Source: https://ru.citaty.net/avtory/iozef-gebbels/?page=
2 And, finally, I don't know about whom, but it is very suitable for this situation:"You have to knock so that the shreds fly."

Source: https://ru.citaty.net/avtory/iozef-gebbels/
Vkd dvk

0

12 February 2018 15: 10

And who interfered with the defeat of the terrorists BEFORE the Russian Aerospace Forces appeared there?
krokus792

0

12 February 2018 16: 42

And how are they going to fight with us? "The Russians are preventing us from fighting them!"
ljoha_d

0

12 February 2018 17: 20

Pentagon: Russia prevents us from defeating terrorists in Syria
We must do away with the Pentagon itself and terrorism will bend by itself
Wolka

0

12 February 2018 17: 52

have the Yankees been hit by the shores, or is the spring exacerbation of schizophrenia?
demo

+1

12 February 2018 17: 54

I remembered my childhood.
There was a boy in the yard.
I didn’t shine with my mind, my hands were growing from the wrong place, but I tried to try to do everything myself.
Poking around, poking around. They offer to help him.
But he proudly rejects.
And when everyone gets tired of it, then the adult takes it and quickly does everything.
Then he arrogantly declares that he would have done everything.
If he had not been disturbed.

USA is a boy from my childhood.
True, significantly outgrown, but just as infantile.
Tolik_74

0

12 February 2018 17: 54

NatAfian warriors from the Pentagon got stoned on glass wool