Military Review

Israeli experts: Russia could mediate in negotiations with Damascus and Tehran

89
Spanish edition RTVE represents the opinion of the Israeli expert Ofer Salzberg on the events in the Middle East. According to the analyst, the north of Israel may affect the war with the participation of Israeli, Syrian and Iranian troops. The situation, as noted by Salzberg, is reduced to a military conflict in the absence of an intermediary between the Israeli authorities on the one hand and Damascus and Tehran on the other.


According to the Israeli expert, the situation in the region cannot be reduced to a new armed conflict, and therefore a mediator is needed in the negotiations between the Israelis and the Syrians (plus the Iranians). Such an intermediary Ofer Salzberg sees the Russian Federation.

From the statement of the Israeli analyst:
In my opinion, Russia is the only country in Syria that has every opportunity to negotiate with both parties and is able to bring the party to a consensus. This will help reduce the risks of a final military confrontation.


Israeli experts: Russia could mediate in negotiations with Damascus and Tehran


The former Israeli ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren (now Benyamin Netanyahu’s assistant on foreign policy issues), expresses a similar opinion. According to him, expressed in an interview BloombergRussia has a dominant position in Syria today. At the same time, the United States calls Oren the state, which today is “out of the game.”

Recall that last Saturday, the Syrian air defense forces shot down an F-16 aircraft of the Israeli Air Force, which attacked military targets in Syria.
Photos used:
www.globallookpress.com
89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 12 February 2018 06: 38
    +2
    Who prevents to start negotiations since Israel is interested in this, I think Russia will not mind acting as a mediator.
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 12 February 2018 06: 51
      +5
      Behind the back of Israel is the United States, which is very profitable for the loosening of Iran. Therefore, they will push the Israeli government to war against Iran, promising to help with the supply of military equipment and ammunition.
      1. maxim947
        maxim947 12 February 2018 07: 07
        +7
        In order to think about the negotiations, you first had to lose the plane ... Yes, and nobody seemed to have refused the negotiations before, only does Israel want IT THIS?)))))
        1. Strips
          Strips 12 February 2018 07: 36
          +4
          Quote: maxim947
          In order to think about negotiations, you first had to lose the plane ...


          The reason is not the loss of the aircraft as such. The situation is developing in such a way that next time, for example, when Iran tries to send a drone again, or to organize the production of weapons for terrorists in Syria, etc., Israel will be forced to strike again and hard.
          Israel does not want this, but Assad, who fell under Iran and its terrorists, leaves no choice.

          Therefore, if the mediator reassures Iran, there are no problems.


          Now, by agreement with Israel, Russia does not meddle in Israeli attacks on Syria, as it understands that the purpose of Israel in Syria is not the overthrow of Assad.


          Everything ultimately depends on Iran and its terrorists. If they intensify in Syria, Israel will strike. If they calm down, then Israel in Syria will also have nothing to do.

          This Iran, located 1500 km away, helps its Lebanese terrorists act against Israel, and also helps Hamas terrorists in Gaza.
          1. astepanov
            astepanov 12 February 2018 09: 53
            +2
            Let me remind you that it all started with a drone shot down by Israel. And they shot him down over the Golan Heights - i.e. over the territory at least controversial. Yes, and was that drone? And was it definitely Iranian? Something all of this resembles the burning of the Reichstag, only inspired by the Ami, who are trying to support the war in the region by any means.
        2. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 12 February 2018 10: 52
          +3
          Quote: maxim947
          In order to think about negotiations, you first had to lose the plane ... Yes, and nobody seemed to have refused the negotiations before, Does Israel Only WANT IT?)))))
          Already wants to. Beforewhen the United States and Co. "reeled" the Assad regime and Israel had confidence that having overthrown the "dictator" with the hands of bearded scouts, he would significantly strengthen his influence in the region and take advantage of his participation in energy projects - then he did not want. He assisted the terrorists and supported them as much as possible, not expecting that Iran would first fit in for Damascus, and then Russia, which would stop the process of “reeling” the regime. It is clear that Iran, having provided Syria with multibillion-dollar financial and military assistance, will hope that these “investments” would be realized in military bases on the territory of Syria and give Iran access to the Mediterranean Sea, which Israel cannot like. But the question arises - before what and what were you thinking about when you supported the mattresses for dismantling Syria? Iran will not leave Syria. The only thing you can bargain about is the range of the Iranian base from the borders of Israel.
      2. Berkut24
        Berkut24 12 February 2018 10: 22
        +2
        Behind israel usa

        And some believe that Israel is behind the United States. Because it’s hard for Americans to turn Jews around, but Jews in the USA have such a lobby that you cannot choose a new president without him and don’t withdraw money from the bank. Perhaps Israel has come to the conclusion that the United States has ceased to cope with its task of horror stories and now will have to talk directly.
        1. XXXIII
          XXXIII 12 February 2018 11: 40
          +2
          Quote: Berkut24
          Behind israel usa

          And some believe that Israel is behind the United States. Because it’s hard for Americans to turn Jews around, but Jews in the USA have such a lobby that you cannot choose a new president without him and don’t withdraw money from the bank. Perhaps Israel has come to the conclusion that the United States has ceased to cope with its task of horror stories and now will have to talk directly.

          Tales of the Jews, the white class rules there, the Americans themselves talk about it.
          But this is their ally ... bully
          Trump's answers to the rest of Bismuth's questions regarding Israel and the Middle East were equally vague. An Israeli journalist asked for clarification of the meaning of the extraordinary statement by the US president that he "removed Jerusalem from the negotiation table." The answer was:
          “Having said that Jerusalem was removed from the negotiating table, I wanted to clarify that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. In everything regarding specific borders, I will support the decision that the two parties will agree on. ”
          https://news.israelinfo.co.il/world/70692
          1. Berkut24
            Berkut24 12 February 2018 11: 58
            +1
            Tales of the Jews, the white class rules there, the Americans themselves talk about it.

            And there a certain "deep state" rules. And yet, yes - the Americans themselves are talking about this. Do you know the national composition of the “deep state by name? Well, the very one whose representatives, according to Putin, come in black suits to each newly elected President and after that he begins to do not what he promised the voters, but what he always did all previous presidents after the visit of these guys in black suits.
            Power and money have no race.
            1. XXXIII
              XXXIII 12 February 2018 12: 14
              +1
              Quote: Berkut24
              Tales of the Jews, the white class rules there, the Americans themselves talk about it.

              And there a certain "deep state" rules. And yet, yes - the Americans themselves are talking about this. Do you know the national composition of the “deep state by name? Well, the very one whose representatives, according to Putin, come in black suits to each newly elected President and after that he begins to do not what he promised the voters, but what he always did all previous presidents after the visit of these guys in black suits.
              Power and money have no race.
              Where there, yes, but the "white American" sits at the top, maybe they affect domestic politics and only hmm. In general, this is a myth for me, it looks like an advertisement of the Jews themselves .... yes They Abamych and then climbed first and marked in the history of American presidents .... lol
      3. XXXIII
        XXXIII 12 February 2018 11: 30
        +1
        Quote: Herkulesich
        Behind the back of Israel is the United States, which is very profitable for the loosening of Iran. Therefore, they will push the Israeli government to war against Iran, promising to help with the supply of military equipment and ammunition.

        Tied up with blood! yes True, the states have a different idea of ​​friendship, as if the Jews did not want to see their spoon in this broth.
        Classic... yes
    2. starogil
      starogil 12 February 2018 07: 21
      +1
      What is the mediator in the division of Syria with its occupier?
      Isn’t there enough collusion, behind Assad, with Netonyah, Erdogan, Trump?
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 12 February 2018 08: 22
        +2
        Assad will need to rebuild the country! Butting Israel will be a hindrance. Persian stubborn desire to climb on the Jews of Syria will not bring any benefits.
        Is the choice a bad world with the prospect of rebuilding the state or butt with Jews without prospects for many reasons?
        In this case, neutrality is more useful, not our showdown.
    3. vlad66
      vlad66 12 February 2018 08: 44
      +7
      According to the Israeli expert, the situation in the region cannot be reduced to a new armed conflict, and therefore a mediator is needed in the negotiations between the Israelis and the Syrians (plus the Iranians). Such an intermediary Ofer Salzberg sees the Russian Federation.

      Why not? what A thin world is better than a good quarrel, but there is another striped little game that needs a quarrel. yes
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 12 February 2018 09: 21
        0
        We will see.
        At the borders of Israel, such a conglomerate is not weak; by definition it will not be friendly to them.
        I still do not believe that the Arabs will be able to take advantage of the resources of the incl. population ... I do not feel love for them, no confidence. For any reason, their affairs have already helped to preserve the state and we will surely continue to insure, to the best of our abilities and their behavior.
      2. Okolotochny
        Okolotochny 12 February 2018 12: 27
        +7
        That's what the life-giving air defense does !!!
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 12 February 2018 13: 44
          0
          If anti-aircraft defense wouldn’t fly, there was a dregs of past joy.
          It is necessary to build all over again, to work, and to study further on the list;
  2. Aaron Zawi
    Aaron Zawi 12 February 2018 06: 40
    +6
    Negotiations are good. After Iran’s refusal to support terror and the exclusion from the political platform of calls for the destruction of Israel. And before that, there’s nothing to talk about, and no one to talk to.
    1. Spartanez300
      Spartanez300 12 February 2018 06: 44
      +8
      Israel itself is not badly fueling the situation in the region, and therefore negotiations are needed to discuss these topics.
    2. 210ox
      210ox 12 February 2018 06: 50
      +1
      “At the same time, Oren calls the United States a state that today is“ offside. ”“ A bold statement. And the exact one. It’s necessary to negotiate correctly. That's all.
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      Negotiations are good. After Iran’s refusal to support terror and the exclusion from the political platform of calls for the destruction of Israel. And before that, there’s nothing to talk about, and no one to talk to.
    3. Sofa General
      Sofa General 12 February 2018 07: 26
      +4
      Aaron Zawi
      Well, for example, the United States and England almost daily declare Russia the main enemy. True, they don’t talk about destruction in the open, but they use the words of their magazines to probe the soil, so to speak ....
      And nothing, we talk at the government level when necessary.
      So both sides are to blame
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 12 February 2018 08: 36
        +1
        Iran is what it is, to ignore and set conditions does not work.
        Again there is a certain choice - a bad world or endless butting with unpredictable results.
    4. Stiletto_711
      Stiletto_711 12 February 2018 08: 59
      +2
      Quote: Aron Zaavi
      After Iran’s refusal to support terror and exclusion from the political platform of calls for the destruction of Israel

      And they will answer you: "After Israel returns all occupied territories."
      So without a compromise, the conflict will go on forever. But he’s not walking on the northern border of Iran, but next to your country hi
  3. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 12 February 2018 06: 43
    +4
    Russia will undoubtedly be the mediator of such negotiations, and on its neutral territory. But all three parties to the conflict should request assistance from Russia about this. In these negotiations, pulling the nostrils is useless. Apparently, the parties are not yet ready to agree among themselves.
    1. karish
      karish 12 February 2018 08: 17
      +4
      Quote: Alex-a832
      Russia will undoubtedly mediate such negotiations

      Russia will not be a mediator in the negotiations, although, to be honest, I believe that the Russian approach could be a more realistic way to solve problems in the BV from the point of view of European values ​​- it is useless. But, in Israel Russia is not trusted, for an absolutely understandable reason. Yes, and do not change the horses at the crossing.
      We survived the silly Obama, Trump is quite happy with us.
      Let someone tell me 3 reasons why Russia is better for us as an intermediary?
      I'm not talking about the presence of a minimum desire on the other hand, and with whom to negotiate?
      With Assad? And what does he control his country?
      Puppet. holding on to power exclusively on foreign bayonets.
      Quote: Alex-a832
      Apparently, the parties are not yet ready to agree among themselves.

      This journalist (absolutely left-wing newspaper) - a little forgotten one thing.
      And from what the hell is Iran, the side of the negotiations?
      1. vlad66
        vlad66 12 February 2018 09: 01
        +8
        Quote: karish
        Russia will not be a mediator in the negotiations, although, to be honest, I believe that the Russian approach could be a more realistic way to solve problems in the BV from the point of view of European values ​​- it is useless.

        Alexander Zdrav Be drinks Well, at least you understand that our approach is more real and that’s okay laughing
        Quote: karish
        But, in Israel Russia is not trusted, for an absolutely understandable reason. Yes, and they do not change horses at the crossing. We survived the silly Obama, Trump is quite happy with us.

        Clear stump laughing Putin, in return, will demand something that you need to perform, well, like a sickle in a well-known place. Well, Trump is certainly good, Ivanka will roll her eyes and daddy without thinking, and without understanding the axes will start tossing themselves. laughing
        Quote: karish
        With Assad? And what does he control his country?
        Puppet. holding on to power exclusively on foreign bayonets.

        Sanya, you see, you know, they will throw off the striped Assad, another puppet will come, who will also hold on foreign bayonets. The example of Iraq and Afghanistan clearly says this, there wouldn’t be mattresses, like corks from the bottle would fly out with their hands and God forbid that would remain alive. request
        Quote: karish
        And from what the hell is Iran, the side of the negotiations?

        what I understand you, Sancho, for many centuries your enmity will be mistrustful, but as the bad world wrote above, it’s still better than a good fight. drinks hi Regards Sancho.
        1. karish
          karish 12 February 2018 12: 02
          +2
          Quote: vlad66
          Lexander Zdrav Be

          Hi !!!! drinks
          Quote: vlad66
          Well, at least you understand that our approach is more real and that’s okay

          He is a force, but on BV everything is decided only by force.
          Quote: vlad66
          Putin's stump is clear and in return will require something that you perform, well, like a sickle in a famous place

          no one knows what he will demand.
          Quote: vlad66
          Sanya, well, you see, well, they will throw off the striped Assad, another puppet will come, who will also hold on foreign bayonets

          We are not opposed if Russia ruled in Syria (at least I) - but there Iran rules the ball no less than yours, and we don’t need it.
          So let one of the two
          Or will our puppet be either neutral or none
          Quote: vlad66
          The example of Iraq and Afghanistan clearly speaks of this, there would be no mattresses, as corks from a bottle would be flown out by their hand guides, and God forbid that they would remain alive.

          Well, is that like Najibula?
          Quote: vlad66
          I understand you Sancho, not one century your enmity will be

          We have had an excellent relationship with Iran all our lives, until the Ayatollahs came to power there.
          Quote: vlad66
          but as the bad world wrote above, it’s better than a good fight.

          It seems that there are no alternatives between a thin world and a fight?
          Yes, actually the tango is dancing together, you first agree with Assad, and we will catch up.
          1. vlad66
            vlad66 12 February 2018 12: 24
            +7
            Quote: karish
            He is a force, but on BV everything is decided only by force.

            So kneading Sanya is not frail from all sides. request And this for a long time and everything leads to the partition of Syria. what
            Quote: karish
            no one knows what he will demand.

            Yes, Alexander, and it’s not for us, in principle, to decide whether negotiations are necessary or not, we can maximum exchange opinions here. hi
            Quote: karish
            We are not opposed if Russia ruled in Syria (at least I) - but there Iran rules the ball no less than yours, and we don’t need it.

            As I wrote above, everything goes to the section of Syria. Rulers are a wagon and a small cart. You yourself know that there are not only Iran, but also Turkey and Saudi and each creature in pairs.
            Quote: karish
            So let one of the two
            Or will our puppet be either neutral or none

            Puppet Sanya is never neutral, someone always pulls the strings, and it looks like there is a fight for it either ours or yours or a strong leader who could calm everyone down, but there’s nowhere to take him. request
            Quote: karish
            Well, is that like Najibula?

            Well, yes, either Karzai or whoever is puppeting there right now. laughing
            Quote: karish
            We have had an excellent relationship with Iran all our lives, until the Ayatollahs came to power there.

            Yes, I know Sanya. yes
            Quote: karish
            Yes, actually the tango is dancing together, you first agree with Assad, and we will catch up.

            About what? We got our own in Syria, Khmeimim and so on, your graters with Assad are your graters, no matter how you shout that you should kill everyone and everything, but Russia just does not interfere in your showdown with either Syria or Hezbollah. drinks hi
            1. karish
              karish 12 February 2018 13: 05
              +3
              Quote: vlad66
              So kneading Sanya is not frail from all sides. And this for a long time and everything leads to the partition of Syria.

              And what did I write about 3 years ago?
              Syria as a single state will no longer be
              Quote: vlad66
              Puppet Sanya is never neutral, someone always pulls the strings, and it looks like there is a fight for it either ours or yours or a strong leader who could calm everyone down, but there’s nowhere to take him.

              The whole problem is (in Russia in the first place) - that Assad will leave.
              Or he will rule in his separate princedom Alavistan.
              70% of Sunnis will not sit under the Alawites.
              It will not.
              Well, probably the sick only believe that the Kurds will return to Syria.
              Quote: vlad66
              What? We got our own in Syria Khmeimim and so on, your graters with Assad are your graters,

              I agree, but the Russian Federation is interested in a stable regime in Syria, and this will never happen with Assad.
              Although without it - it is already unknown when laughing
              Quote: vlad66
              but Russia just doesn’t interfere in your showdown with either Syria or Hezbollah

              Absolutely wise position, for this we respect her
              1. vlad66
                vlad66 12 February 2018 13: 15
                +6
                Quote: karish
                Syria as a single state will no longer be

                It seems like Sancho, but here everyone is waiting for March 18 in Russia. yes And there already the most interesting will begin.
                Quote: karish
                The whole problem is (in Russia in the first place) - that Assad will leave.
                Or he will rule in his separate princedom Alavistan.

                While we are there, Sanya, he will not go anywhere. But I repeat, everyone is waiting on March 18. And then everything will be decided.
                Quote: karish
                Although without it - it is already unknown when

                That's right. good
                Quote: karish
                Absolutely wise position, for this we respect her

                Thank you friend Alexander! drinks hi
                1. karish
                  karish 12 February 2018 13: 29
                  +1
                  Quote: vlad66
                  It seems like Sancho, but here everyone is waiting for March 18 in Russia.

                  And what is March 18?
                  Quote: vlad66
                  And there already the most interesting will begin.

                  If you are about the presidential election?
                  Well, retirement age will increase 100%
                  Quote: vlad66
                  While we are there, Sanya, he will not go anywhere. But I repeat, everyone is waiting on March 18. And then everything will be decided.

                  What is this March 18th?
                  Tell me what could be there, I'm really interested
                  Quote: vlad66
                  Thank you friend Alexander!

                  drinks
                  1. vlad66
                    vlad66 12 February 2018 13: 44
                    +6
                    Quote: karish
                    If you are about the presidential election?
                    Well, retirement age will increase 100%

                    Yes, it’s Sanya who is the most about them, about them, if in the USA the course remains the same during the change, it is only adjusted, everything is possible with us and turns of 720 degrees. laughing I’m not afraid of it, I’m already retired, I’m lucky at least in this yes but for others it's a shame. drinks drinks
      2. Alex-a832
        Alex-a832 12 February 2018 09: 13
        +4
        Quote: karish
        We survived the silly Obama, Trump is quite happy with us.
        Let someone tell me 3 reasons why Russia is better for us as an intermediary?

        When choosing a mediator, Israel will also take into account the fact that Iran and Syria will be sharply against US participation, while all parties understand that if you invite the United States, you can not start negotiations - there will be nothing good. Other strong and respected by all potential parties to the negotiations of the players, except Russia, I do not see. Russia does not have a counter with Israel. With all those known in the equation, if we need negotiations with a mediator competent and respected by all parties, striving for stability in the region, then this is Russia. China, for example, having no direct interests in reaching a compromise between the parties to the negotiations, will be useless as a mediator, etc.
        1. karish
          karish 12 February 2018 12: 56
          0
          Quote: Alex-a832
          When choosing a mediator, Israel will also take into account the fact that Iran and Syria will be sharply against US participation,

          And what does Iran have to do with it?
          Quote: Alex-a832
          at the same time, all parties understand that if you invite the United States, you can not start negotiations

          And if Iran’s paw is in them, is it worth starting them? belay
          Quote: Alex-a832
          Other strong and respected by all potential parties to the negotiations of the players, except Russia, I do not see

          Russia in its status is no different from the United States, except if there is less authority (in BV)
          Quote: Alex-a832
          Russia does not have a counter with Israel. With all the known in the equation, if you need negotiations with a competent and respected by all parties mediator, striving for stability in the region, then this is Russia

          Did you ask Assad at all?
          In general, Assad - who is this?
          Does he control his country? Does he have real power?
          Who is he ?
          Does Syria as a country exist at all?

          Quote: Alex-a832
          China, for example, having no direct interests in reaching a compromise between the parties to the negotiations, will be useless as a mediator, etc.

          Does China need this?
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 12 February 2018 06: 49
    +9
    Russia is the only country in Syria, which has all the possibilities for negotiations with both parties and is able to bring the party to consensus
    It’s strange. Either Israel is actively pouring a gasoline into the fire of the Syrian war, then suddenly experts started talking about the fact that Russia could help in the negotiations. When strikes were imposed on the territory of Syria with impunity, Russia’s help was for some reason not needed. Why's that?
    1. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 12 February 2018 06: 54
      +4
      Quote: rotmistr60
      It’s strange. Either Israel is actively pouring a gasoline into the fire of the Syrian war, then suddenly experts started talking about the fact that Russia could help in the negotiations. When strikes were imposed on the territory of Syria with impunity, Russia’s help was for some reason not needed. Why's that?

      You can take such experts from Solovyov in a transfer of five cents per bundle. They would only crow, and there the grass does not grow.
      1. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 12 February 2018 07: 02
        +8
        You can take such experts from Solovyov in a transfer of five cents per bundle
        You are not hinting at Jacob Kedmi, who is not shy and not afraid to express his opinion and position, incl. and in the usa? So, there would be more of such people, so that in Israel some would start to think realistically, rather than splashing hatred of Russia.
        1. Professor
          Professor 12 February 2018 08: 09
          +5
          Quote: rotmistr60
          You are not hinting at Jacob Kedmi, who is not shy and not afraid to express his opinion and position, incl. and in the usa?

          And what will the USA do to Yushka Kazakov? That's why from and so brave. Try to walk along Putin and again will become an unknown pensioner such as he is in Israel.
          1. rotmistr60
            rotmistr60 12 February 2018 08: 24
            +4
            Try he walk on Putin
            Well, you said so. We local (Russian) on TV are so that sometimes ears wither and nothing.
        2. karish
          karish 12 February 2018 08: 24
          +2
          Quote: rotmistr60
          You are not hinting at Jacob Kedmi,

          Of course he is one of these * experts *
          Quote: rotmistr60
          who are not shy and not afraid to express their opinion and position including and in the usa?

          so why be afraid? We generally have freedom of speech on TV and you don’t hear that.
          Only here is Yasha laughing
          understandably, everyone wants to eat, but ....
          I would be ashamed in his place.
          Quote: rotmistr60
          So, there would be more of such people, so that in Israel, some people begin to really think

          No one has ever considered Yasha in Israel to be an expert, and in Israel he is nowhere to be seen.
          Do you know why? Shame doesn’t want, we won’t forget the tanks.
          Quote: rotmistr60
          rather than splashing hatred of Russia.

          in Israel they treat Russia very well.
          You are not our enemies. but you can’t be called friends.
          Nor do we believe you and there are hundreds of reasons for this.
          trust must be earned. request
          1. Crane operator Nahamkinson
            Crane operator Nahamkinson 12 February 2018 09: 01
            +4
            "we do not believe you and there are hundreds of reasons for this."
            Oh well....
            And how do we "believe" you ....
            Especially after the bracket,
            with his company.
            Only a piece of iron in his head
            reassured.
            And so he dreamed of making a desert from Russia.
            "trust must be earned"
            Nothing confused?
            Should the Russian people earn the trust of the Jews?
            1. Krasnodar
              Krasnodar 12 February 2018 09: 11
              -1
              Quote: Crane Operator Nahamkinson
              "we do not believe you and there are hundreds of reasons for this."
              Oh well....
              And how do we "believe" you ....
              Especially after the bracket,
              with his company.
              Only a piece of iron in his head
              reassured.
              And so he dreamed of making a desert from Russia.
              "trust must be earned"
              Nothing confused?
              Should the Russian people earn the trust of the Jews?

              Did Trotsky dream of making a desert out of Russia?
              Nu-but ...))))
            2. karish
              karish 12 February 2018 13: 30
              0
              Quote: Crane operator Nahamkinson
              Should the Russian people earn the trust of the Jews?

              If you want to be mediators in negotiations, yes.
              How else ?
        3. Strips
          Strips 12 February 2018 08: 27
          +1
          Quote: rotmistr60
          who are not shy and not afraid to express their opinion and position including and in the usa?


          Why should he be afraid and embarrassed?
          He lives in Israel, and not in Russia.



          Quote: rotmistr60
          So, there would be more of such people, so that in Israel some would start to think realistically, rather than splashing hatred of Russia.


          Such as mud in Israel. It is in Russia that they are glad that someone was found from abroad, especially from Israel, an ally of the United States, who supports Russia in some way.

          In Israel, this opinion is not surprising, and in Russia such as Solovyov invite paid "type" American experts who should play the role of whipping boys and through whom Solovyov and others publicly humiliate the United States on their show, because in reality this does not work.
          We would invite a real, intelligent expert, people with an alternative point of view and have a real discussion. But this is not the goal of many Russian programs. Real experts are not invited, as you have to sweat a lot.

          Kedmi has long been published as an expert and is in demand mainly in Russia, as it has a point of view similar to Russia and there is nothing wrong with that. But as an expert, he is already especially quoted. He has long been out of work.
        4. rocket757
          rocket757 12 February 2018 08: 40
          0
          What difference does sho there on TV different experts say.
          Official guys can think very differently ... we don’t know.
          There will be real actions then we will understand what they meant there!
      2. Alex-a832
        Alex-a832 12 February 2018 09: 24
        +1
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        You can take such experts from Solovyov in a transfer of five cents per bundle. They would only crow, and there the grass does not grow.


        Aron, you skillfully translated the essence of the issue into a discussion of the personality of the "experts." Better substantiate essentially - what is wrong with the fact that in fact Russia can become the sole mediator of the constructive negotiations of the three.
    2. flicker
      flicker 12 February 2018 14: 11
      +2
      It's weird. Israel is actively pouring a gasoline into the fire of the Syrian war, then suddenly experts started talking about the fact that Russia could help in the negotiations
      The problem is that there was a split between American Jews and Israeli, the first Israel is not needed, and the second is more than needed. But the latter depend on the former (although here on the website the Jews believe that the opposite is true) and this is a fact. First, for example: Kissinger states that Israel will no longer be in 2022. Question: how should it disappear? Probably through the war that the Islamists must lose. Those. American Jews draw Israel into a war, and into a defeatist one. Netanyahu does not want such a war, but he cannot openly challenge the first, that’s maneuvering between the rare shelling of Syria and his visits (telephone conversations) to Sochi, in order to keep the hezbollah away. So the situation there is extremely difficult. And for us, too, on the one hand, we want to support Netanyahu, and on the other we have allies in the fight against terrorists there. Plus, in the American elite itself, there is a split between financiers and the military, hence the assaults on Trump. In short, the situation is confusing.
      1. karish
        karish 12 February 2018 14: 17
        0
        Quote: flicker
        It's weird. Israel is actively pouring a gasoline into the fire of the Syrian war, then suddenly experts started talking about the fact that Russia could help in the negotiations
        The problem is that there was a split between American Jews and Israeli, the first Israel is not needed, and the second is more than needed. But the latter depend on the former (although here on the website the Jews believe that the opposite is true) and this is a fact. First, for example: Kissinger states that Israel will no longer be in 2022. Question: how should it disappear? Probably through the war that the Islamists must lose. Those. American Jews draw Israel into a war, and into a defeatist one. Netanyahu does not want such a war, but he cannot openly challenge the first, that’s maneuvering between the rare shelling of Syria and his visits (telephone conversations) to Sochi, in order to keep the hezbollah away. So the situation there is extremely difficult. And for us, too, on the one hand, we want to support Netanyahu, and on the other we have allies in the fight against terrorists there. Plus, in the American elite itself, there is a split between financiers and the military, hence the assaults on Trump. In short, the situation is confusing.

        neither eat tomatoes nor morning or evening fool
        rare nonsense.
        Will you be copy-testing? laughing
        Quote: karish
        Quote: flicker
        If this serves the interests of the state? let him ride every day
        Serves, serves and serves very much. Between American Jews and Israeli there was a split regarding the fate of Israel. Israel doesn’t care about the Americans and they demand from Israel (read: Netanyahu) to get involved in the war with Syria, with all its consequences (for the chaos of BV, Israel’s defeat of the Islamists is necessary). Netanyahu and can not disobey (too fraught) and does not want to get involved - hence the half-measures militarily.

        For a long time did not read more nonsense
        1. flicker
          flicker 12 February 2018 14: 35
          +3
          What distinguishes many Jews here on the site is that their Jews run ahead of the brain.
          This is not my nonsense, this is a fact:
          Henry Kissinger and sixteen American intelligence agencies concluded that in the near future, "Israel" will cease to exist.
          The New York Post quotes Kissinger literally: "Ten years from now, there will be no Israel."
          Kissinger’s statement is straightforward.
          He does not say that “Israel”, although in danger, can be saved if you help him with trillions of dollars and the protection of the American armed forces.

          He does not say that if Netanyahu’s old friend Mitt Romney wins the election, Israel can survive.

          He does not say that if you start bombing Iran, then “Israel” can continue to exist.

          He does not offer any way out.

          He simply states a fact: by 2022 there will be no "Israel".

          US intelligence agencies agree with this, although they are not sure of the exact date.
  5. Herculesic
    Herculesic 12 February 2018 06: 54
    +7
    There will be no negotiations! The United States, the Saudis and Israel need to inflict maximum damage to Iran in order to deprive him of the status of regional leader! And for this, all methods are good - from military provocations, which will occur more often, to the strengthening of economic sanctions against Iran.
    1. karish
      karish 12 February 2018 08: 26
      +1
      Quote: Herkulesich
      There will be no negotiations! The United States, the Saudis and Israel need to inflict maximum damage to Iran in order to deprive it of its status regional leader

      the leader. we like that kind of leader.
      maybe more (in the split of Muslims) than Iran - no one did.
      Who is he the leader before?
      1. Strips
        Strips 12 February 2018 08: 35
        +1
        Quote: karish
        leader


        Iran leader of Shiite terrorists
  6. bald
    bald 12 February 2018 07: 59
    +3
    It is high time and the result will be positive. Not everyone in Israel has such an opinion, what about partners? So let them choose, to dance to the tune of some - war, but peace is needed - they will agree.
    1. karish
      karish 12 February 2018 08: 28
      +2
      Quote: bald
      to dance to the tune of some - war, but peace is needed - will be agreed.

      You will first seat the Syrians at the negotiating table (for starters) and achieve something - and then so categorically affirm.
      One example, when the mediation of Russia in the negotiations between the two warring countries led to peace?
      1. bald
        bald 12 February 2018 08: 52
        +5
        The negotiations initiative is generally yours. The Syrian government (I emphasize - the government), sit at the negotiating table, without any tension. And at the expense of preventing wars (conflicts), but in life, we only bred - they turn not to the states when the kirdyk, but to us. Eli, you, do not consider your assistant Benjamin Netanyahu on foreign policy issues far.
        1. karish
          karish 12 February 2018 11: 53
          +1
          Quote: bald
          The negotiations initiative is generally yours

          Seriously ?
          Quote: bald
          The Syrian government (I emphasize - the government), sit at the negotiating table, without any tension.

          Why so sure?
          Quote: bald
          And at the expense of preventing wars (conflicts), but in life, we’re only bred

          Can I have an example?
          Not when the conflict was divorced and frozen, but when Russia's mediation in the negotiations led to the conclusion of peace.
          Quote: bald
          Do you think your assistant Benjamin Netanyahu on foreign policy issues is not far away

          Bibi is not stupid, therefore, has never declared a desire to see the Russian Federation in peace talks as an intermediary.
          1. bald
            bald 12 February 2018 16: 09
            +1
            It seems that there is a split in your ranks - the positions are different. 1. Initiative, proposal, opinion - already exists (read the article) 2. But not with the USA, she should sit down at the negotiating table. Only Syria turned to Russia - not to one neighbor - this speaks volumes. Syria needs peace, eh? 3. Negotiations in Sochi - warring parties came there that are not so easy to put together - the result was that part of the opposition went over to the side of the government army, civilians returned to the liberated territories. 4. Michael Oren - expresses a similar opinion. You decide - reasonable.
      2. Hottabych
        Hottabych 12 February 2018 10: 29
        +2
        Quote: karish
        One example can be given.

        I can give many examples when a disaster happened due to the fact that one of the parties does not want reconciliation ....
        1. karish
          karish 12 February 2018 11: 53
          +1
          Quote: Hottabych
          Quote: karish
          One example can be given.

          I can give many examples when a disaster happened due to the fact that one of the parties does not want reconciliation ....

          Didn't you seem to be asked about this?
          1. Hottabych
            Hottabych 12 February 2018 12: 01
            +2
            Quote: karish
            Didn't you seem to be asked about this?

            And I tell you about it.
      3. Okolotochny
        Okolotochny 12 February 2018 12: 32
        +4
        So not only us, but the USA has nothing to brag about, not to mention others. No negotiations led to peace unless there had been a military victory. Negotiations lead to clouding of conflicts.
  7. Professor
    Professor 12 February 2018 08: 03
    +4
    The Spanish edition RTVE presents the opinion of Israeli expert Ofer Salzberg regarding events in the Middle East


    Well, what kind of expert is he? This is a journalist from an ultra-left newspaper that in another country would have long been covered up for anti-state activities and supporting terrorism. However, we have democracy and "freedom of speech."

    Russia cannot be a mediator because:
    1. It traditionally holds exclusively about the Arab position.
    2. Russia has no means of influence on all parties to the conflict. Not a hat for Senka.

    We will be happy to negotiate and make peace with our neighbors (Egypt and Jordan are witnesses to this), but the eye doctor must first recognize the fact of our existence.

    PS
    Not a day without an article about Israel. I love this site. love
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 12 February 2018 08: 44
      +3
      Well, the "love" of many for the state of Israel, for the Jews finally!
      They have everything in their house in order! Nothing more to talk about.
      It can be assumed (sales assert) that our fat belts for this Temko specially pay extra!
    2. flicker
      flicker 12 February 2018 13: 25
      +4
      Russia has no means of influence on all parties to the conflict. Not Senka hat
      Yes, the main thing is that Israel has "means of influence"
      "Henry Kissinger and 16 US intelligence agencies said:" There will be no Israel by 2022 "
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 12 February 2018 13: 50
        +3
        There are no means of influence ??? - et wishful thinking!
        There is a military-industrial complex and the opportunity to arm the opponents of Israel against the will of anyone ... and it will not be bows and arrows!
        This is an argument that outweighs all Wishlist by Western benefactors of Israel.
      2. Professor
        Professor 12 February 2018 14: 14
        +1
        Quote: flicker
        "Henry Kissinger and 16 American Intelligence Services stated: “There will be no Israel by the 2022 year” "

        And can you show the link? wink

        Quote: rocket757
        There are no means of influence ??? - et wishful thinking!

        Totally.

        Quote: rocket757
        There is a military-industrial complex and the opportunity to arm the opponents of Israel against the will of anyone ... and it will not be bows and arrows!

        And now you are not arming them? And what will change?

        Quote: rocket757
        This is an argument that outweighs all Wishlist by Western benefactors of Israel.

        Not. 99% of the weapons of our enemies delivered by you. Do you have a lot of influence on Israeli politics? That's it.

        The intermediary must be either:
        a) neutral
        b) fabulously rich
        c) influential

        You are neither one nor the other.
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 12 February 2018 15: 00
          0
          The mediator should be a big bore ... this has been practiced more than once and has been good.
          Neutral boring is even better.
          Everything else is not mediation, imposing one’s will.
          At the expense of weapons and who is pulling on what, the issue is debatable .... the most important thing is that we do not need naf and take the guys of the Arabs / Persians under our guardianship more expensive. I hope our leadership does not step on this rake.
          In short, walk the cowboy John, while you haven’t stepped on your favorite corn to any of the serious guys.
  8. shans2
    shans2 12 February 2018 08: 21
    +3
    Russia will participate in the section of what is now called Israel, the return of the Golan and the revival of Palestine)


    1. Strips
      Strips 12 February 2018 08: 44
      +2

      Russia will participate in the section of what is now called Israel, the return of the Golan and the revival of Palestine)




      The USSR could not, Russia and even more so wink

      Iranians make a good face with a bad game.
      What a change in the balance of power, if Israel destroyed a part of Syria’s air defense for a shot down plane, it hit Iran’s targets in Syria.

      What did Syria or Iran answer? They began to sing about what will not go unanswered, about a change in the balance of power.

      In fact, Israel once again showed the red lines, in response to which the Syrians and Iranians could not give out anything but verbal diarrhea.

      The Syrians were lucky that the pilots were still alive, otherwise the answer would have been much more painful for Assad and the Iranians in Syria.
      1. shans2
        shans2 12 February 2018 08: 49
        +1
        Continue to overcome Russia and Iran, the reality comes to you kosher like a giraffe, and then you go crazy with your own matrix))
        1. Strips
          Strips 12 February 2018 08: 56
          +1
          Quote: shans2
          Continue to overcome Russia and Iran


          I'm just writing about the real situation.



          Quote: shans2
          you get kosher like reality before a giraffe, and then you go crazy with your own matrix))


          Well, I don’t know, while Israel is doing pretty well, but you are fantasizing about the matrix, the return of the Golan Heights, the division of Israel.

          Apparently, it is for you that reality will strike and it will hit painfully.
          1. shans2
            shans2 12 February 2018 09: 02
            +3
            so as not to waste time on you, I’ll just quote Kota Moti, many people know him, how holy water acts on vampires, the main thing is that he writes for 2–3 years in advance comes true:

            “We have come to the point where a practically open conflict with Myshrael could well happen. They hope for fear of them, not like military force, but like information-inflated NOTHING, because they are information-inflated NOTHING ... but the Most Serene knew "this time may well come and they can no longer hope for anything, for not a step back. If they trample in the open - great Ales to them." (c) Cat Motya 12.02.18/XNUMX/XNUMX
            1. Strips
              Strips 12 February 2018 09: 09
              +1
              Quote: shans2
              so as not to waste time on you


              Could simply write: "Instead of merging and disgracing, I will give a stupid quote."
              1. astepanov
                astepanov 12 February 2018 09: 55
                +3
                with a lot of stupid grammatical errors
      2. Crane operator Nahamkinson
        Crane operator Nahamkinson 12 February 2018 09: 10
        +3
        "The USSR failed, Russia for a long time"
        Wrong Jew.
        Any Russian Tsar,
        could you quietly ..... within
        Pale of Settlement.
        But they didn’t do it.
        They were too kind kings to you.
        Because now you are writing nasty things here.
        Change the flag.
        And then like an abram in a public bath.
        1. Strips
          Strips 12 February 2018 09: 11
          +2
          Wow, someone is being bombed lol
          Apparently, the tap is leaking wink
  9. Dormidont
    Dormidont 12 February 2018 09: 45
    0
    As said classic
  10. astepanov
    astepanov 12 February 2018 09: 54
    0
    Quote: astepanov
    Let me remind you that it all started with a drone shot down by Israel. And they shot him down over the Golan Heights - i.e. over the territory at least controversial. Yes, and was that drone? And was it definitely Iranian? Something all of this resembles the burning of the Reichstag, only inspired by the Americans, who are trying to support the war in the region by any means.
  11. Yura Yakovlev
    Yura Yakovlev 12 February 2018 10: 54
    0
    If someone wants to agree, then he will agree without any intermediaries. Sami brewed porridge, yourself and dissolve. And don’t make fools of us
  12. flicker
    flicker 12 February 2018 11: 36
    +3
    Israeli experts: Russia could mediate in negotiations with Damascus and Tehran
    Could, because it is interested in the world in BV. But for this, all parties owe Russia trust, and not dust in the eyes: speak and promise one thing, and do another.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 12 February 2018 11: 44
      +1
      Our mediation is usually bumps from all sides!
      WMS should not be fooled, and then get the next sanctions from its Western "partners"?
      Looks like Old Man, he provided the "platform" for negotiations and mustache ... he will let them into some room and go out the door, and there themselves, if the desire is reconciled and everything goes like that, answer if that (but it is very likely) I don’t have to ... I was standing outside the door and what they decided there was not in the know!
      For trust ??? about this and stutter no trace! immediately the most guilty will be appointed !!!
      1. flicker
        flicker 12 February 2018 12: 13
        +3
        We will not run ahead of the engine. We are interested in the world in the BV, but not more than the BV countries themselves. Moreover, "Henry Kissinger and sixteen American intelligence agencies have come to the conclusion that in the near future," Israel "will cease to exist." Those. they declare that by 2022 there will be no Israel. Question: How will it cease to exist? They will say: are we tired, are we leaving, or will they be dragged into a deliberately losing war?
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 12 February 2018 12: 40
          +1
          Israel may run into big trouble, a lot has already been done for this.
          Our really BV seriously get into the weld is not reasonable. They helped an ally, it’s understandable, justified, and to pop into the main ball of this snake catcher! Bite from many sides.
          There such ties exist, long-term ones, tied up with blood and bucks ... so all sorts of applications for leadership in such a region are directly naive for some reason.
          Climb a tree. like that wise monkey and their advice, advice, wise teachings !!! You will be whole in all respects and you will come to be a sage!
          1. flicker
            flicker 12 February 2018 13: 19
            +3
            The question of the measure of retraction is probably the main one, but it seems to me that we are very neat in this regard.
            1. rocket757
              rocket757 12 February 2018 13: 51
              +1
              I like our two ministers, they work well, with high quality!
  13. XXXIII
    XXXIII 12 February 2018 12: 05
    +1
    Israeli experts: Russia could mediate in negotiations with Damascus and Tehran
    You can start right tomorrow good .... create your own “G Middle East” world east and a strong position on the world platform, though the Arab League is already there sad .... On the G20 represent the Middle East - Saudi Arabia! Turkey! It turns out that these countries determine the policy of the Middle East belay .... Damn where is Israel? request ..... and he plays war games winked .... These are the things Middle Eastern repeat .
  14. Prutkov
    Prutkov 12 February 2018 12: 40
    +1
    Perhaps a coincidence. But in modern wars there are no direct answers to strikes. Khmeimim drones attacked, and in response, two Saudi aircraft "crashed in the sky over Yemen." The militants shot down the SU-25. And suddenly the Jewish F-16 “broke”. And Bibi immediately began to name the GDP.
  15. ASG7
    ASG7 12 February 2018 14: 11
    +1
    Israeli interests in Syria are the maximum weakening of centralized power (the consolidating component of the Arabs), while it does not matter which pro-Assad or pro-Turkish or even pro-American. Ideally, a bunch of fleeing motley tribes would suit them. The second stage of the strategy will be to strengthen its influence in the border territories in Syria, right up to the seizure of these territories.
    With the advent of Russia, all this strategy went aside, and what remains for Israel is to create the image of a world enemy (in this case, Iran) .and begin to fight with it with heroic efforts, while not forgetting to beat the Arabs in the tail. That's what they are begging for carte blanche from Russia, you look, and they’ll give them a ride like the Turks did.
  16. Leonid Dymov
    Leonid Dymov 12 February 2018 19: 03
    +1
    In Russia, the main enemy is the United States and its puppets from NATO. Israel has a relatively sovereign policy: it does not impose sanctions against us, a visa-free regime between our countries. Russians are doomed to be intermediaries, especially in the Caucasus. We even have to reconcile Abkhaz clans. Russia is interested in peace in the Middle East with Syria, Israel, Iran, Turkey, Kurds, etc.