Military Review

Thunder of victory, resound!

44



Shapkozakidatelsky "hurray-patriotism" is no less harmful to the interests of Russia than defeatist and capitulatory moods

The publication Regnum published an article by its political observer, Yuri Baranchik, under the prodigiously inspiring headline: “The Middle East goes under the control of the united group of Russian air defenses.” Actually, then you can not read, because the main meaning of this material I just gave you.

A set of “arguments”, frankly far-fetched in justifying such a conclusion, looks like a certain picture from the life of a parallel Universe, where America has long been turned into a complete geopolitical nothing, and the Russian flag proudly flies over the whole world. Which, let me remind you just in case - in order to fight for political sobriety, in reality does not even fly over the South Korean city Pkhenchkhan.

On the basis of the fact that Turkey’s sale of a very limited batch of C-400 air defense systems has already taken place, about which a fierce bargain between the parties continues on the sale of technologies, and a similar deal with Saudi Arabia has not yet taken place, the author of Regnum boldly looks beyond He sees, no less, a fundamentally new geopolitical configuration of the whole world! Here you are:

“This shows the complex interaction of the leadership of Russia with the leadership of Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and other countries ... the achievement of such a military-political understanding suggests that, most likely, Russia and the oil countries of the Middle East have agreed on a joint strategy for the development of the oil and gas sector why these territories should be taken under reliable control by Russian air defense systems "


In general - walk America, Russia taxis! To match this fundamental conclusion and the purely military-strategic "argumentation":

“... it must be remembered that the main component of the American strategy of seizing territories and countries is to achieve overwhelming air superiority. Without this, the United States does not think of any military campaign. With the C-400 complexes, this task of the US military command is not solved. Accordingly, the risk of US military engaging in a military campaign against countries possessing C-400 complexes tends to zero if these countries have a political component to resist


In no case, without questioning the outstanding military merits of the C-400 complex, I just want to remind Mr. Y. Baranchik that the US has many other ways to turn any country into fiery geenna without even entering its air defense zone. A typical example is the same Syria, which, not without the help of America, with its deadly "struggle for democracy", turned from a flourishing country into a pile of smoking ruins long before the American Air Force planes appeared there. Yes, and from the once stable and completely prosperous Ukraine, there is little left, although it also has quite effective C-300 air defense systems, and America doesn't fly there either.
Frankly speaking, crazy, patriotic patriotism, in my opinion, is no less harmful than infantile alarmism in the style of “all-polymers”. Probably from those distant times, when I first learned how, on the eve of the German attack on the USSR in 1941, Soviet propaganda spread irresponsible tales among the people that we would overcome any enemy with “little blood, a powerful blow” and in two weeks we will celebrate victory in Berlin . Such hats and actions, tantamount to the moral unpreparedness of many of our people for a difficult and protracted struggle with a strong adversary, turned into terrible defeats in the forty-first year, which nearly led to the collapse of the country.

And here again - “your song is good, start over”! As far as I know, the Regnum columnist Yury Baranchik is from Belarus. And surely he should remember about the sale by the authorities of this country at the beginning of the 90s. complex ZRK C-300 US government. Based on its current Middle Eastern logic, it can be argued that the American-Belarusian geopolitical alliance was created in this way, and Belarus "came under the control of the combined US air defense group."

In fact, nothing of this, of course, was not. As there is not and can not be all of what, as about the almost accomplished fact, writes “Regnum”.

Acquisition of advanced Russian military equipment by some Middle Eastern countries may have much more prosaic and not so optimistic reasons for the Russian Federation. And the same persistent litigation around the possibility of gaining access to Russian production technologies is the surest confirmation of this. And indeed, why does Turkey, or Saudi Arabia, which, according to Baranchik’s version, become for the Russian Federation almost new “fraternal countries”, need access to such technologies? We would have trusted just our new “elder brother”, with whom they already seemed to have reached a complete geopolitical consensus against America - and this is all to be done. And brains do not need to soar over the completely alien to the Middle East mentality of Russian technical genius.

But no, they strive to grab from her "hopes and pillars" - Russia, its technological secrets! And here is the time again to recall the sale in the US by fellow countrymen Y. Baranchik ZRK C-300. The purpose of the deal for Americans was to only familiarize themselves with the advanced for that time. weapons potential adversary. And they fully achieved this goal.

There is exactly no reason to believe that the situation in this Middle East case is qualitatively different. The same Saudis, if Russia becomes so scandalized that it will give them its technologies, there are a million reasons to make a pleasant surprise to its American partners, with whom they have long been dancing together the vigorous Bedouin lezginka.

Thunder of victory, resound!


Yes, of course, and it would be foolish to argue with that, Russia in recent years has achieved some success in the Middle East, especially noticeable against the background of a complete zero of previous 25 years. However, to draw conclusions about the almost geopolitical reformatting of this key region of the planet with its transition to the control of the “united air defense of the Russian Federation” on this basis is about the same thing as on the basis of the record snowfall in Moscow to declare the planet’s entry into the new ice age.

Meanwhile, the situation in the same Middle East, if you do not look at it through the rose-colored glasses of unshakable aura-patriotism, is very far from the blissful picture that the Regnum observer painted. And, perhaps, its most important, at the moment, characteristic is that the allegedly defeated and precipitated by the US geopolitical sediment, along with its faithful squire Israel (although go know who has the faithful squire there) the same Syria as unceremoniously as before. And the most important thing is that with deadly blows they deliver deadly strikes on Russia's direct military-political allies — Syria and Iran. And they became so impudent that Russian planes were shot down by the hands of their hirelings. True, in the latter case, otvetka, in the form of an F-16 stuck in the ground, was not long in coming. But all the same, it’s somehow a bit like the final geopolitical Victoria, which, according to Mr. Baranchik’s theory, Russia already has in his pocket.

And this is not to mention the fact that the “One Belt, One Road” project mentioned by the Regnum author, on which he naturally imposes a supposedly existing “Russian air defense strategy in the Middle East”, is not a project of Russia, but quite the opposite - instrument of global economic and geopolitical expansion of the People’s Republic of China. And it turns out that the “unified Russian air defense system” will be designed to protect the interests of great China in the Middle East?

Isn't it an “inspiring perspective” for Russia? Especially considering the fact that the allegedly humiliated American hegemon, against which all the Middle Eastern powers under the auspices of Moscow already almost agreed, did not even think to leave the region somewhere and is quite capable of arranging the greatest troubles to anyone who encroaches on their local interests. And no matter how it turned out, Russia will end up in the role of dragging chestnuts out of the fire for the same China. To the loud applause of the news agency “Regnum” and its columnist who is hallucinating on the basis of hurray-patriotism.
Author:
44 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vard
    Vard 12 February 2018 07: 37
    +2
    Of course, elements of dizziness from success are present ... But you must agree the general trend is in our favor ...
    1. vladimirZ
      vladimirZ 12 February 2018 08: 48
      +16
      In support of the article, another hat-taker Vard. What week are you writing about? Where is she? In what?
      Russia is isolated in the world community, the Army is “reformed” to the point of not being ready against a serious aggressor.
      There are problems in the Army, from the mismatch of its organizational structure, the lack of a mobilization reserve, to the lack of everything and everything. The east of Russia is disorganized as regards the presence of troops there, everything is destroyed and collapsed there. In the West, they are again returning to the "pre-reform" organization of troops, but very slowly.
      1. Safevi
        Safevi 12 February 2018 10: 13
        +3
        Read Regnum- do not respect yourself! A long walk on the Web photo beaten in the trash of the editor Kolerov. By the way, nothing to do with fakes and disinformation.
      2. raw174
        raw174 12 February 2018 10: 54
        +3
        Quote: vladimirZ
        In support of the article, another hat-taker Vard.

        Well, they took and branded a man)))
        Quote: vladimirZ
        What week are you writing about? Where is she? In what?

        The fact that Russia for the first time in its history (modern, namely Russia) has swung at an open military confrontation with omnipotent Americans. We supported Assad in word and deed not in order to save him specifically, but in order to oppose our interests to the West. It’s too early to talk about the results, we’ll talk to you right away, at 14.00:12.02.2030 p.m. Moscow time, on February XNUMX, XNUMX, agreed? wink What is success for today? At a military base in the region. We show the strength of the army, and the Arabs they are such a people, respect the force ...
        In general, it is too early to count those chickens, the descendants will evaluate and render a verdict.
        1. vladimirZ
          vladimirZ 12 February 2018 13: 15
          +9
          What is success for today? At a military base in the region. We show the strength of the army, and the Arabs they are such a people, respect the force ... - raw174

          How do we show strength there? The actions of the combined regiment of the VKS? The naval base that we are provided with in Syria?
          We have enough problems on the borders of Russia. It is necessary to restore the "reformed" "Serdyukov" Army. On the western border a few tens of kilometers from St. Petersburg are NATO troops, the United States. The Kaliningrad enclave is completely surrounded by their troops. In the south, threatening unpredictability, due to the same US support, Bandera Ukraine, in the Caucasus there is an outstanding crisis with Georgia, there are interethnic conflicts themselves. In the Far East and in Transbaikalia, in general, is the land of abandoned and routed military garrisons.
          And we climb into Syria, to fight terrorism, under the pretext of "as if they would come to us after the victory in Syria". Well, isn't it funny? At the borders themselves, they are strained to a close military situation from a serious aggressor, who again united the whole of Europe against us, and we damn where we climb.
          1. raw174
            raw174 12 February 2018 13: 37
            +2
            Quote: vladimirZ
            How do we show strength there? The actions of the combined regiment of the VKS?

            And not only ... More MTR, engineers, navy and other advisers.
            By the way, Crimea was also a demonstration of not only strength but also will.
            Quote: vladimirZ
            We have enough problems on the borders of Russia.

            No one denies them, but they can and should be solved, including by demonstrating opportunities in other regions. To cool some hotheads.
            Quote: vladimirZ
            On the western border a few tens of kilometers from St. Petersburg are NATO troops, the United States. The Kaliningrad enclave is completely surrounded by their troops.

            Do you propose to hit them or build a “shaft” of people and equipment? Not the first nor the second will not help ... It is necessary to fight to prove combat capability, so that they have no bad thoughts.
            Quote: vladimirZ
            And we climb into Syria, to fight terrorism, under the pretext of "as if they would come to us after the victory in Syria". Well, isn't it funny?

            Not funny. For the war in Syria is a warning to the aggressors: "That's what we have, that's how we use it, that's what will happen to the enemy."
            Quote: vladimirZ
            The borders themselves are strained to a close military situation from a serious aggressor, who again united all of Europe against us

            That's why you don’t need to rattle your weapons at the very borders, not even an hour will blaze! Better to burn far.
            1. vladimirZ
              vladimirZ 12 February 2018 13: 50
              +3
              Not funny. For the war in Syria is a warning to the aggressors: "That's what we have, that's how we use it, that's what will happen to the enemy." - raw174

              There is no logic in your comments. What warning about what? What are we strong? Than? We are collecting aviation and flight personnel to Syria throughout Russia. 1500 people of only flight personnel are not enough in the aerospace forces, and IAS is still in large numbers.
              The army is not combat-ready and ready to withstand the aggressor; they “reformed” it by virtue of being fit only to fight terrorists. Yes, what can I say, your knowledge of the Russian Army is superficial. Have you served in the Army?
              Watch the video of Lieutenant General Sobolev V.I. about the modern Army, everything is intelligibly painted there.
              1. raw174
                raw174 12 February 2018 14: 56
                +2
                "Than?"
                Army, technology, determination.
                "We are collecting aviation and flight personnel to Syria throughout Russia."
                In general, we use something that you can do without, such as strategists and decks, so that everyone goes through school. But I'm not saying that there are no problems. Their mass.
                "There is no army capable of fighting and ready to withstand the aggressor," reformed "it because it was only capable of fighting terrorists."
                To be honest, I don’t think that there will be a big war in Europe, for it will end its nuclear weapons.
                "Have you served in the Army?"
                Yes. Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation, Sevastopol. Only urgent.
                1. vladimirZ
                  vladimirZ 12 February 2018 16: 58
                  +3
                  In general, we use something that you can do without, for example, strategists and decks, - raw174

                  You're wrong. Used both. Even dalnikov from Siberia, the Irkutsk region, with Bela.
                  That there will be no big war, no one knows. At first, the USA will not get involved in the war themselves, there are mongrels who are ready to get involved, if only the USA were behind them, the same Ukraine with volunteers from all over Europe. By the type of war 08.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX - you know what? In Ukraine, they will not use nuclear weapons? Check for strength, and there, as the card lies. We give slack - trample in full all the rest on us, just hold on. But we have nothing special to hold on to the ground forces. The army counts only on the fight against terrorists, even exercises are conducted only on them. So, something like that.
                  As for nuclear weapons against the main adversary, remember Brzezhinsky’s words about the elite that keeps their finances in the United States and in the West, and that it is no longer our elite, and they will not deliver nuclear strikes to their families and palaces.
                  1. KaPToC
                    KaPToC 12 February 2018 19: 37
                    +2
                    Quote: vladimirZ
                    remember the words of Brzezinski, about the elite, which keeps its finances in the USA and in the West, and that it is no longer our elite

                    Brzezinski is just a dumb oligophrenic. The elite owns the means of production in Russia and will not go anywhere from Russia, and in the west the thieves who stole in Russia and fled - they are not the elite.
                    1. vladimirZ
                      vladimirZ 13 February 2018 06: 04
                      +2
                      Brzezinski is just a dumb oligophrenic. The elite owns the means of production in Russia and will not go anywhere from Russia, and in the west the thieves who stole in Russia and fled - they are not the elite. - KaPToC

                      lol Disrespect for the enemy, and Brzezinski is a smart enemy, dearer to himself.
                      According to the "elite" that owns the means of production, it is all in the offshore and banks of the United States and the West. All of them are there, they only make loot, and they are in power in the leadership of Russia.
                      Take the families, relatives of any of them, Putin, Lavrov, Medvedev, and other of them, all there in the West. Well, how will they deliver nuclear strikes on their own?
                      So, the threat of nuclear weapons from Russia is under big questions, even as a reciprocal step.
                      1. KaPToC
                        KaPToC 13 February 2018 21: 04
                        +2
                        Quote: vladimirZ
                        Disrespect for the enemy, and Brzezinski is a smart enemy, dearer to himself.

                        The enemy is not respected only because he is an enemy, this enemy does not deserve respect.
                        Quote: vladimirZ
                        According to the "elite" that owns the means of production, it is all in the offshore and banks of the United States and the West.

                        Study the economy and you will be welcome.
                        Quote: vladimirZ
                        Take the families, relatives of any of them, Putin, Lavrov, Medvedev, and other of them, all there in the West.

                        I don’t know about everyone, but Lavrov is definitely not in the west.
                      2. vandarus
                        vandarus 14 February 2018 17: 22
                        0
                        Yes Brzezinski he laughing
                  2. raw174
                    raw174 13 February 2018 07: 51
                    +1
                    Quote: vladimirZ
                    Used both.

                    I say so that they used both strategists and decks, although there was no real need ...
                    Quote: vladimirZ
                    there are mongrels who are ready to get involved, if only the USA were behind their shoulders, the same Ukraine with volunteers from all over Europe.

                    Of course, the Americans themselves, as always, want to sit overseas ... But the times are not the same, now the fleet is no longer needed to strike at the USA, there are other delivery vehicles.
                    Quote: vladimirZ
                    By the type of war 08.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX - you know what?

                    Of course I know, I know the guys who took part. They resolved the issue quite professionally and quickly. The main thing was enough political will. In the case of such steps by Ukraine, I think that the result will be similar.
                    Quote: vladimirZ
                    In Ukraine, they will not use nuclear weapons?

                    How will it go, if NATO troops go through Ukraine, they will use it, they know about it, therefore they will not trample it.
                    Quote: vladimirZ
                    We give slack - trample in full all the rest on us

                    That's why you need to demonstrate your army in action, you need to use rockets, planes and all other weapons there, in Syria and other countries of the east, so that you are afraid to stick out from Europe. While it works ...
                    1. vladimirZ
                      vladimirZ 13 February 2018 08: 21
                      0
                      That's why you need to demonstrate your army in action, you need to use rockets, planes and all other weapons there, in Syria and other countries of the east, so that you are afraid to stick up - raw174

                      lol No need to meddle anywhere. Due to the scarcity of the Russian budget, it is urgent to recreate the ground forces in the western potential theater of operations. This is the main, and most urgent, to protect Russia from external interference. The United States and the West are well aware of our military condition, and you won’t surprise and warn them anywhere with a "show of strength".
                      It is surprising that you do not understand the current geopolitical and strategic situation when the newly united Europe, under the leadership of the United States, confronts Russia on its western borders. And we are not ready again, and moreover, we are distracting our not so great powers, God knows where.
                      Unfortunately, you misunderstand quite simple truths, either due to lack of education, or not to be able to analyze political events. No offense. hi
                      1. raw174
                        raw174 13 February 2018 10: 33
                        +1
                        Quote: vladimirZ
                        No offense.

                        There can be no offense here, we communicate normally, despite different points of view good
                        Quote: vladimirZ
                        when the newly united Europe led by the USA

                        Do you still think that Europeans have such a short memory? I do not believe in a forceful solution on their part, it is easier for them to put pressure economically, as they did on the USSR in the 80s.
                2. yehat
                  yehat 15 February 2018 17: 00
                  0
                  PPC Well, how do you like the fleet? everything is cool?
                  ships for 30-40 years.
      3. Lexus
        Lexus 12 February 2018 11: 51
        +10
        What trend are you writing about? Where is she? In what?

        Every day on television in the central channels they’re spinning like a “Papa Carlo’s barrel-organ”, that everything is growing and improving).
    2. NordUral
      NordUral 12 February 2018 09: 18
      +10
      And where, please tell me? Syria is turning into our Vietnam, which cannot be lost in any way.
      But where is the power that can do this? The insignificants in power in the USSR, starting with Nikita, swept the Great Union, and these insignificants, who are now on a horse, have plundered and betrayed, and even continue these vile affairs with Russia.
      It's time to throw fanfares and joyful slogans into the bin. The country faces huge challenges and only a truly intellectual elite can adequately and with a positive effect respond to the challenges of the time and, in particular, the United States.
  2. Gardamir
    Gardamir 12 February 2018 07: 54
    +13
    In anticipation of the election, the Kremlin should talk as much about its alleged victories as possible. Otherwise, they will not vote for that. And then after the election, as always, the facts on different compotes will be available.
    1. NordUral
      NordUral 12 February 2018 09: 23
      +7
      Lie to the rescue? But the people need to vote so that thieves and liars are transferred to power.
      1. KaPToC
        KaPToC 12 February 2018 19: 38
        +2
        Quote: NordUral
        Lie to the rescue? But the people need to vote so that thieves and liars are transferred to power.

        The very idea of ​​the election of rulers is flawed, it is necessary to return to the ballots "against all"
  3. Sirocco
    Sirocco 12 February 2018 08: 45
    +2
    Who, to whom, what did he say? what euphoria, living in capitalism, or rather under the capitalists, I strongly doubt that someone will carry chestnuts to someone, both here and in others.
    At the expense of protecting the air defense)))) Either Chinese interests, or someone else's, I think there are many interested people who need a calm region. Now about other routes, this is the Northern Route, which we control, again China has its own views, as well as the Nicaraguan Canal, about which there was talk about financing it by China, and our part of the deal is equipment and ensuring safety during construction. Tandem, so to speak, what will be the result, see if you feel dizzy? time will tell.
  4. Moore
    Moore 12 February 2018 09: 08
    +5
    As we see from the discussion, we have both cheers and patriots in assortment ...
    1. NordUral
      NordUral 12 February 2018 09: 28
      +7
      There are realists, do not despair. I attribute myself to them. But this does not mean that the truth must be kept silent. And now with An-148 a wave of lies is rising, the information is changing on the go, noticing the traces of the explosion aboard the sea of ​​empty reasoning and no less muddy information.
      And this is a terrorist attack which is clearly indicated by the radius of dispersion of the Ana wreckage.
      1. Moore
        Moore 12 February 2018 09: 43
        +6
        Please do not force you to be ranked as a sect either. For example, conspiracy theorists. However, perhaps you are an expert and you can determine by eye the cause of the accident without decoding the recorders, spectral analysis, etc. Then I take my words back.
      2. raw174
        raw174 12 February 2018 12: 08
        +3
        Quote: NordUral
        And this is a terrorist attack which is clearly indicated by the radius of dispersion of the Ana wreckage.

        Wait - wait! Let's start from the beginning ...
        What is a terrorist attack, or rather why do terrorists need it? Not to kill specific people, but to intimidate people, to sow panic and distrust of the authorities like that? So. And according to this, terrorists should beat all the drums and ring on every corner that they were the ones who did it (in the official language: "take responsibility") and this must be done in the shortest possible time and announced loudly, otherwise the whole action loses its meaning ... Who took responsibility in this case? Which group?
        Quote: NordUral
        a wave of lies rises, information changes on the go,

        Who gives it? Journalists? There is no official version yet - all speculation and version.
    2. Lopatov
      Lopatov 12 February 2018 10: 11
      +2
      Quote: Moore
      we have both cheer patriots and guard patriots in stock

      The moderators of all liberal guards led 8)))

      The problem with all this contingent is the surrender of reason to external control. Well, no, damn it, the desire to understand the issue at least minimally. Although the Internet provides an opportunity to do this quite easily, almost everyone knows how to use search engines.
  5. captain
    captain 12 February 2018 10: 35
    +4
    I agree with the author, as I wrote in the comments, that this cheers-patriotism will not bring to good. 41 year, we must remember the words "the best defense minister of all time and the people of Grachev"; I will restore order in Chechnya with one regiment of the Airborne Forces. Pointed ...
    1. Hottabych
      Hottabych 12 February 2018 11: 17
      +1
      Maybe he would have brought it if they had given ...
      Another thing is how much blood would be ?!
    2. Maki Avellevich
      Maki Avellevich 12 February 2018 21: 43
      0
      Quote: captain
      I agree with the author, as I wrote in the comments, that this cheers-patriotism will not bring to good.


      "The doctor was very happy to get rid of the second lieutenant Oak, who, as the best evidence of his various statements, cited the only argument:"Before the war, we talked about this with Mr. District Chief".
      I. Hasek
  6. Sergeant71
    Sergeant71 12 February 2018 11: 42
    +5
    Great article! It may make you think, even wise up a little and will serve as a vaccine for the local cheers-patriotic brotherhood, in which we are advancing on all fronts, the 2-th Virgin Front under the command of V. Solovyov yesterday surrounded Fashington and is already preparing to hoist the tricolor over the White House. And the EU fell apart and "rotted" completely, living on our loans)))))
    1. captain
      captain 12 February 2018 16: 49
      +2
      Quote: Sergeant71
      Great article! It may make you think, even wise up a little and will serve as a vaccine for the local cheers-patriotic brotherhood, in which we are advancing on all fronts, the 2-th Virgin Front under the command of V. Solovyov yesterday surrounded Fashington and is already preparing to hoist the tricolor over the White House. And the EU fell apart and "rotted" completely, living on our loans)))))

      I have a colleague, he is Ossetian by nationality. He was visiting him and his wife (Russian) told a wonderful incident. Children came to her relatives from the USA. She (wife) George was friends with them and she and her husband were invited to sit and remember their youth. They drank one or two and the turn came to George to say a toast. George was an Ossetian Muslim. He rises slightly staggering and says a toast; I believe that the time will come and my grandchildren will raise the green banner of Islam and the Russian tricolor over the dome of the White House in Washington. And he offered to drink for it. What then did the wife tell him and the relatives of the wife who invited them would not write.
  7. Radikal
    Radikal 12 February 2018 12: 10
    +2
    The publication "Regnum" published an article by its political observer Yuri Baranchik
    The surname (forgive me admins) speaks for itself! wassat
  8. Radikal
    Radikal 12 February 2018 12: 13
    +2
    Respect for the author of the article! hi
  9. flicker
    flicker 12 February 2018 19: 13
    +3
    Shapko-zakadatelstvennaya "cheers-patriotism" is no less harmful to the interests of Russia
    I read, was horrified by the perniciousness of "cheers-patriotism" and began to consider everything that was happening around him from this angle. As I didn’t try, as I didn’t peer, but to my great chagrin, I didn’t find anywhere so dangerous for the country “cheers-patriotic” moods. For some reason, it was thought that maybe the article is not at all about the dangers of "cheers-patriotism" - but simply, under the guise of combating "cheers-patriotism" (which even in Baranchik’s article just is point blank), let his own country negativity, albeit not so sharply, but on a large scale: it affects everything from Turkey to China.
  10. Altona
    Altona 12 February 2018 19: 23
    0
    There is no such jingoism. Too early, the end of the war in Syria was announced. A few points are left for the Americans, from where they can dictate their Wishlist. Terrorists of all stripes both received and are receiving the latest systems, including MANPADS. With US help, terrorists can transfer to anywhere in Syria.
  11. fa811147
    fa811147 12 February 2018 21: 15
    0
    While the big uncles take a step forward and then two steps back, what successes can we talk about? For starters, learn how to do simple things, so that Philips or Samsung can buy people with pleasure and pride. Sorry for the slogans, he is already sick. I love and respect Russia, but do not stick it out, especially to those who have masters in other countries.
  12. vladimirZ
    vladimirZ 13 February 2018 12: 00
    0
    raw174,
    Do you still think that Europeans have such a short memory? I do not believe in a forceful solution on their part, it is easier for them to put pressure economically, as they did on the USSR in the 80s. - raw174

    The memory may not be short for Germany, but for the rest, especially in Eastern Europe, revenge for Russia — our former “allies” under the Warsaw Pact and “brotherly” under the Soviet Union.
    And most importantly, the incited United States, not reassured that Russia did not fall apart like the USSR. This task of the USA is facing them as a global one. By the way, the internal 5th column in the power of Russia also works on it.
    And the fact that they will use the chance of aggression from the Bandera Ukraine, supported by the whole of Europe and the USA, is almost 100%. The question is only time and moment.
    Perhaps, as an option, at the time of the victory of the candidate of the left forces, the Communist Party in the elections, when there is a real threat to the oligarchy in power, and then they simply "open the borders" for the aggressor along the entire western border. This cannot be ruled out, and our armed forces must be prepared for such a development of events. If you miss this, Russia will be divided into colonial fragments like the USSR.
  13. lopvlad
    lopvlad 14 February 2018 20: 19
    +2
    Shapkozakidatelsky "hurray-patriotism" is no less harmful to the interests of Russia than defeatist and capitulatory moods


    normal patriotism is born out of cap-patriotism in a person, but liberalism of doubt is born out of moderate patriotism in a person, which means that the risk of betrayal increases.
    The most capricious patriotism is present in large numbers in the United States, which is the global hegemon and the master of the world economy based on the dollar. If the capricious patriotism is eliminated in the United States and "media" is introduced into all mass media, then they will collapse faster than the USSR.
    The term "dizziness from success" in relation to the fate of their country is used by those who are against any success of the country.
    1. yehat
      yehat 15 February 2018 17: 19
      0
      hatred is simply inadequacy.
      any enemy, even not armed, can strangle you in a dream
      and neither rockets, nor tanks, nor hundreds of divisions will help you if you sleep.
      this must not be forgotten.
  14. Vladimir Vasilich
    Vladimir Vasilich 15 February 2018 16: 58
    0
    I completely agree with the author of the article
  15. Dimy4
    Dimy4 16 February 2018 14: 13
    0
    Well, the physics of the American in the photo.
  16. Rotmistr
    Rotmistr 16 February 2018 18: 27
    +15
    Yeah, the Middle East has gone under the cover of our air defense
    Protecting your planes is a problem