The head of "Rostec" said that could lead to a new arms race

62
The updated nuclear doctrine of the United States could lead to a new arms race, reports RIA News Statement by Rostec Corporation General Director Sergey Chemezov.





Answering the question of a journalist of the Washington Post newspaper, in which direction are relations between the US and Russia, Chemezov noted that the earliest possible establishment of normal relations between the two countries will be beneficial for the whole world.

The closer the relationship between Russia and America, the more weapons will be reduced - above all, nuclear ones. But what do we see now? The US is adopting a new program. This will not lead to an improvement in the situation in the world,
he said.

This will lead to a new arms race, because we will have to do what the Americans do,
added the head of the state corporation.

He was not particularly optimistic about the START-3 treaty (in the US version of the New START).

Until trust is established, how can we talk about further arms reduction talks if we do not trust a friend?
noted Chemezov.

Recall that in early February, the Pentagon promulgated a nuclear doctrine, in which he paid great attention to the development of Russian nuclear forces. Among other potential threats to the US military called the DPRK, Iran and China.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    11 February 2018 10: 08
    The updated nuclear doctrine of the United States may lead to a new arms race, RIA Novosti reports a statement by Rostec Corporation CEO Sergei Chemezov.

    But the Dark One had previously stated that we would not fit in this "race." request
    1. +2
      11 February 2018 10: 17
      Seryoga, welcome! hi Mattresses very hotz Russia to draw into a new race. But will it work? We will see about this according to them.
      1. +3
        11 February 2018 10: 19
        Pasha, hello! hi We are not equal to their dough allocated for armament. By the way, Trump yesterday signed 700 lard to them.
        1. +5
          11 February 2018 10: 21
          And we take not the loot, but the skill. wink
      2. +1
        11 February 2018 10: 46
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Mattresses very hotz to draw Russia into a new race

        Who is driving someone, Pasha? Fifteen years ago, the Yankees shouted that they would crush Russia with the latest weapons. We have Zircons on the way, and they have deterrence at the level of the Olympic Games. Type wrong in a test tube urinated.
        Oh and sodred among the bourgeois, Uncle Vova three skins drinks
        1. +2
          11 February 2018 10: 49
          Volodya, hello! hi Wishlist far from always become a reality. Mattresses should not forget about this. wink Yes
          1. +1
            11 February 2018 10: 57
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            Wishlist far from always become a reality. Mattresses should not forget about it.

            What are you talking about, Pasha? Well, the wrong president of America was chosen. Correct drinks
            1. +2
              11 February 2018 11: 00
              So you still chose Trump! lol
              1. +1
                11 February 2018 11: 13
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                So you still chose Trump!

                Not. I initially chose some kind of Johnson from the third, lebaristic pariah, then representatives of the FSB came and strongly recommended voting for Trump, then the GRU came with Clintonsha, but it was too late drinks
                1. 0
                  11 February 2018 11: 36
                  The reporter asks the model, and who is such an unpretentious companion?
                  - Mom told me that all men are ano, so I chose a small bunch for myself
      3. 0
        11 February 2018 10: 54
        Russia or the USSR, it’s easier for us to neutralize all their attempts. Even in spite of the economy that is not comparable with those times, it will not be necessary to close the “friends” of the falsified by the internal affairs bodies and the social camp that were in those days. Besides, now China on our side. Then they were neutral, or hostile.
        1. +2
          11 February 2018 11: 15
          China on the side where it is profitable
    2. +1
      11 February 2018 10: 18
      To trust Americans - not to respect themselves, they have already accustomed everyone to the fact that they fulfill the agreement when it is profitable for them, and then, when there is no longer any profit, they spit on everything and everyone.
      1. 0
        11 February 2018 12: 49
        Quote: Thought Giant
        To trust Americans - not to respect themselves, they have already accustomed everyone to the fact that they fulfill the agreement when it is profitable for them, and then, when there is no longer any profit, they spit on everything and everyone.

        Well, this is the rule of the strong, it is carefully observed throughout the world! So I don’t see anything strange request
    3. +3
      11 February 2018 10: 25
      We will not be able to do the same as the Americans, the budget is too different. We can only oppose the creation of weapons on the principle of "cheap and cheerful." We cannot understand the new, full-scale race of Russia; let us soberly assess the situation and act selectively, for example, in the field of precision weapons and nuclear submarine shipbuilding. Premier League is a powerful argument for deterrence.
    4. +6
      11 February 2018 10: 36
      The US is adopting a new program. This will not improve the situation in the world,

      But we will give them the S-400 and peace will come around the world. Yes Dear authors and editors, is it not easier to not pull out quotes and bring this interview in full or at least give a link where you can read in full, then it will be possible to discuss more objectively. hiYes, and sracha decrease on the forum. Regards hi
      1. +1
        11 February 2018 11: 03
        Quote: vlad66
        But we will give them the S-400 and peace will come around the world.

        M not only vparim, but also teach him how to use
        1. +6
          11 February 2018 11: 11
          Quote: Tusv
          M not only vparim, but also teach him how to use

          But this is not necessary, since they believe that they are the navel of the earth, let them figure it out themselves. laughing
          And forget to send instructions. laughing hi
          1. 0
            11 February 2018 11: 17
            vlad66
            Edak Cupids on shitty democratic warheads thrash
      2. 0
        11 February 2018 12: 56
        Quote: vlad66
        give in full or at least a link where you can read in full, then it will be possible to discuss more objectively

        [media = https: //www.washingtonpost.com/world/putin
        -ally-warns-of-arms-race-as-russia-considers-resp
        onse-to-us-nuclear-stance/2018/02/10/23dd3cf2-0cf
        2-11e8-baf5-e629fc1cd21e_story.html?utm_term=.1f0
        d11c4ec7a]
        The link beats the title of the article: Putin's ally warns of an arms race, as Russia considers the response to the US nuclear position.
    5. +1
      11 February 2018 11: 13
      .s.zzz888
      But the Darkest previously stated that we will not fit into this "race"... request

      The “Darkest” apparently has reasons for this, unlike us “strategists”.
      And the fact that the Americans are clearly bluffing is a fact. The closest example is the DPRK.
      When the US staged a “race” with the USSR, China was already working for the US economy.
      Now the situation is different - the United States drove China to the chalice with Russia, declaring it an opponent of the United States. Definitely, against Russia and China in the arms race, the United States will be the first to exhale - "Bolivar will not stand the two." Yes
  2. +1
    11 February 2018 10: 08
    No gentlemen, this time you don’t untwist us for an arms race .. We have learned from bitter experience!
    1. +5
      11 February 2018 10: 16
      Quote: MIKHAN
      No gentlemen, this time you don’t untwist us for an arms race .. We have learned from bitter experience!

      So do not need to spin, Russia has no money for any race! And everyone knows about it. And Americans in the first place. So one side will arm itself and concentrate weapons on the Russian borders, while the other will express indignation on this issue and scare them with asymmetric responses. ... After all, there is nothing left.
      1. +2
        11 February 2018 11: 00
        Quote: Stas157
        So do not need to spin, Russia has no money for any race!

        Well, this is how to say .. The Russians are able to concentrate and if necessary we will find money and resources!
        Quote: Stas157
        So one side will arm itself and concentrate weapons on the Russian borders, while the other will express indignation

        Russia has one character trait, on the one hand, bad, on the other, good (which has helped us more than once) We know how to stoop .. hehe Where you need and do not need!
        Russia has huge potential, no matter how we are robbed .. For this they hate and fear us!
        Major Filipov, soldier Prokhorenko ..This is our secret weapon and the most powerful at all times! In this race, Russians are unrivaled .. soldier
        1. +2
          11 February 2018 11: 08
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Russia has huge potential, as if we were not robbed

          Unfortunately, over time, and the potential ends ... like everything else.
          Even the gods die request
          1. +1
            11 February 2018 11: 29
            Quote: Deadush
            Even the gods die

            It’s you who are hinting at .. hehe
            Do not miss the gentlemen .. laughing God bless the Russian squads forever!
            1. +3
              11 February 2018 11: 33
              Quote: MIKHAN
              It’s you who are hinting at .. hehe

              subtle hint of thick circumstances laughing
        2. +2
          11 February 2018 11: 54
          Especially with respect to pensions, benefits and scholarships, it is noticeable that we are "being low." But so conceived, for the "MULTI-MOVEMENT"!
        3. 0
          11 February 2018 12: 27
          MIKHAN Prokhorenko Senior Lieutenant! Yes ???
          1. 0
            11 February 2018 14: 41
            Quote: Evgeniy667b
            MIKHAN Prokhorenko Senior Lieutenant! Yes ???

            They are both soldiers of the Empire! soldier
      2. 0
        11 February 2018 13: 08
        Quote: Stas157
        So do not need to spin, Russia has no money for any race!


        All the same, there isn’t much! And so, Stas, you always turned the situation upside down! We don’t need to catch up with them Stas, they need it us catching up Yes
        1. +5
          11 February 2018 15: 00
          Quote: you Vlad
          Quote: Stas157
          So do not need to spin, Russia has no money for any race!


          All the same, there isn’t much! And so, Stas, you always turned the situation upside down! We don’t need to catch up with them Stas, they need it us catching up Yes

          You don’t have to go to the circus! Where is there if the budget is scarce? We have already eaten the reserve fund! Officials are planning to impose a paw on retirement ... They are already discussing how to tax mushroom pickers and berry growers! Where next then ?! Soon they will begin to rip off a beggar from a beggar! Behind the homeless will!
          In short. Voting soon, you need to make the right choice! Last time I suggested voting for Grudinin, so the moderators soldered me a warning! Where's the justice?
          1. +1
            11 February 2018 16: 07
            Quote: Stas157
            Where is there if the budget is scarce?

            The Ministry of Economic Development has again published an ultra-positive forecast. Russia's budget in 2018 will become surplus for the first time in seven years, as follows from the review "The Picture of the Economy", which was published on Monday by the Ministry of Economic Development.
            "The federal budget will end 2018 with a surplus of about 1% of GDP," the review said. It is worth noting that the budget surplus was recorded in 2011 and amounted to 0,43% of GDP. After that, the budget deficit grew annually and reached a maximum in 2016 - 3,94% of GDP. The ministry explains such a positive forecast by the fact that over the past three years, Russia has implemented a whole block of structural reforms in macroeconomic policy. And this, at a fixed price of $ 43,8 per barrel, Stas, doesn’t that mean anything to you?
            Quote: Stas157
            We have already eaten the reserve fund!

            It simply ceased to transfer profits from oil and gas revenues (for this reason it already eaten) redirected everything to the national welfare fund.
            Quote: Stas157
            They are already discussing how to tax mushroom pickers and berry pickers!

            Again as always laughing You're lying
            Meanwhile, the Ministry of Agriculture said that such an initiative never existed. “The information that appeared in the media that the Ministry of Agriculture advocates the introduction of a license for the collection of wild mushrooms is fiction and does not correspond. reality, ”the press service of the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia said.
            Quote: Stas157
            Where next then ?!

            To the circus, to you to the circus!
            Quote: Stas157
            Soon they will begin to rip off a beggar from a beggar!

            Stas bravo lol
            Quote: Stas157
            In short. Voting soon, you need to make the right choice! Last time, I proposed not to vote for Grudinin, so the moderators soldered me a warning!

            Where's the justice?
            And on the topic, you are somehow forgot something to answer so agitation waved!
            Quote: You Vlad
            All the same, there isn’t much! And so, Stas, you always turned the situation upside down! We don’t need to catch up with them Stas, they need to catch up with us
            1. +3
              12 February 2018 14: 50
              Quote: You Vlad
              Russia's budget in 2018 will become surplus for the first time in seven years, as follows from the review "The Picture of the Economy", which was published on Monday by the Ministry of Economic Development.

              Why do you all feed breakfast! As will be then write. In the meantime, the budget is scarce, for seven years, judging by your own words.
              1. 0
                12 February 2018 17: 24
                Quote: Stas157
                Why do you all feed breakfast!

                Stas, and you haven’t answered anything on the topic wink Work further than the hard worker.
          2. 0
            11 February 2018 17: 53
            And Stas is talking about this: The new US nuclear doctrine calls for a buildup of nuclear weapons, including low-power nuclear weapons. A draft document called the Nuclear Policy Review, prepared by the US Department of Defense, was published by The Huffington Post.
            The document, in particular, proposes to modernize the nuclear triad, including atomic submarine missile carriers, strategic aviation and intercontinental ballistic missiles. In addition, plans were announced to modernize some low-powered missiles in submarines and to return a “cruise missile with a nuclear warhead”.
            And in these components they will catch up wink
    2. BVS
      +1
      11 February 2018 10: 18
      Chemezov noted that this will lead to a new arms race, because we will have to do what the Americans are doing.
      But the Russian economy will withstand a new arms race, because the Soviet Union could not stand it?
      1. 0
        11 February 2018 13: 08
        The updated nuclear doctrine of the United States may lead to a new arms race, RIA Novosti reports a statement by Rostec Corporation CEO Sergei Chemezov.
        yes Chemezov-chortov Genius!
  3. +1
    11 February 2018 10: 26
    Quote: MIKHAN
    No gentlemen, this time you don’t untwist us for an arms race .. We have learned from bitter experience!

    And we do not need to spin! We ourselves will untwist. If the country doesn’t succeed with the economy, you need to find opponents from the outside, and get ready to “meet it with dignity.” Yes, you need to earn money. If the economy just moves and the military budget grows, it’s best to cut it. And we will build an aircraft carrier (although destroyers haven’t been let down for a long time), and new planes and tanks. Well, there’s a means of grandiose construction projects. The Olympics and the Universiade have been accepted, we’ll take the football championship, we need another cosmodrome! Well, the guarantor of the method suggested we urgently need a supersonic passenger peelaz! what hi
    1. +1
      11 February 2018 11: 05
      Quote: fa2998
      Well, the guarantor of the method suggested we urgently need a supersonic passenger peelaz!

      laughing wassat crying Well, anger in you, right to tears ... heh heh
      There are many heroes in Russia, but there are even more whiners and alarmists ..
      It is time for the NKVD to rebuild!
      1. 0
        12 February 2018 17: 25
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Well, anger in you, right to tears ... heh heh

        Stupidity causes joy only among the same fools. And yet ... You, especially not for the NKVD, do not save the KGB from the collapse of the USSR and the NKVD from the collapse of Russia will not save. In my life, I have often seen children galloping through the ashes, raising clubs of black ash. So one child ... wassat
  4. +5
    11 February 2018 10: 26
    so it’s not necessary to conduct provocations ... and so there’s enough charge that the ball would go to dust ...
  5. +1
    11 February 2018 10: 28
    Quote: bvs
    Chemezov noted that this will lead to a new arms race, because we will have to do what the Americans are doing.
    But the Russian economy will withstand a new arms race, because the Soviet Union could not stand it?

    The USSR would have endured everything if not for the parasites of the social union country, and the traitors in power structures.
  6. +2
    11 February 2018 10: 34
    Russia has enough nuclear weapons to classically “bang the whole world into ruin” ... Why do we grind the Earth to dust? But amers obviously have nuclear weapons problems and problems are very large. Trump won North Korea scared, and you say that we will be dragged
    1. 0
      12 February 2018 17: 28
      It is necessary to conclude a Non-Aggression and Mutual Assistance Treaty with the DPRK ... request
  7. +2
    11 February 2018 10: 59
    In vain there are some panic. As far as I know, in the military-industrial complex, for the most part, our economy is not market, but planned. At purchasing power parity, our defense budget corresponds to 300 greens. So everything that we need will master ...
    1. 0
      11 February 2018 11: 35
      Quote: cedar
      At purchasing power parity, our defense budget corresponds to 300 greens. So everything that we need will master ...

      In vain did you give out this secret of ours .. Now, "comrades from Israel" will appear with the "facts" he he
      The most expensive and unsaleable is RUSSIAN SPIRIT! And our guys constantly prove it ..
  8. +1
    11 February 2018 11: 38
    Quote: MIKHAN
    It is time for the NKVD to rebuild!

    You know, healthy criticism is not so dangerous for the country than “hooray-patriotism.” So they will come forward for you. Stop shouting HURRY and look back negative hi .
    1. +1
      11 February 2018 12: 31
      Quote: fa2998
      You know, healthy criticism is not so dangerous for the country

      In the 90s, we felt it very well for ourselves, the majority of the population of the USSR ..
      Quote: fa2998
      than “hooray-patriotism.” So they will come forward for you. Stop shouting Hooray, and look around

      Afraid of us, and we will come at night ..

      Time X is now gentlemen ..
      1. 0
        11 February 2018 12: 54
        And there are no relatives of Vlasov and his henchmen of Kaminsky’s henchmen, or they are also zapadents.
        1. 0
          11 February 2018 14: 45
          Quote: loginovich
          And there are no relatives of Vlasov and his henchmen of Kaminsky’s henchmen, or they are also zapadents.

          Judging by our site, all sorts were hehe .. soldier
          The SMERSH structure needs to be restored urgently in Russia!
          1. 0
            11 February 2018 20: 43
            Successes. Look, don’t work before. Otherwise, it seems to be a respected organization, and from it such outstanding liberals came out of the GDP of his friends Ivanov, Kalugin, etc.
  9. 0
    11 February 2018 11: 50
    The arms race has already begun. And we are in it as outsiders. Although, maybe it's for the best.
    1. 0
      11 February 2018 12: 12
      Sergeant71 ..... The arms race has already begun. And we are in it as outsiders. Although, maybe it's for the best.

      That's why the "sergeant" tongue You did not become an officer. Yes
  10. 0
    11 February 2018 12: 22
    Quote: Sergeant71
    The arms race has already begun. And we are in it as outsiders. Although, maybe it's for the best.

    And she never stopped. It braked - yes, sometimes from both sides, but it never stopped. And it will not stop, because the competition of the "armor-shell" has always been, is and will be
    And do not think that someone is so ahead of the others that they will be able to "destroy the enemy with little blood and in enemy territory." Most often, the work goes "head to head". If it were different, long ago one of the “clients” would have played in the box
  11. +1
    11 February 2018 13: 00
    Mouse vs. Cheese Commandment
  12. +1
    11 February 2018 14: 45
    Our poor country, its “friends” first ruined it, and now, if anything, the arms race will finish it completely .... At the end of the next presidential term, we have: a team without an anthem and a flag at the Olympics, a pension fund without money, sanctions that alas, they didn’t help us, the ruins of the housing and communal services, thieving officials ..... and the Forbes list, in which the rich became only richer ....
  13. +1
    11 February 2018 19: 56
    Quote: you Vlad
    And Stas is talking about this: The new US nuclear doctrine calls for a buildup of nuclear weapons, including low-power nuclear weapons. A draft document called the Nuclear Policy Review, prepared by the US Department of Defense, was published by The Huffington Post.
    The document, in particular, proposes to modernize the nuclear triad, including atomic submarine missile carriers, strategic aviation and intercontinental ballistic missiles. In addition, plans were announced to modernize some low-powered missiles in submarines and to return a “cruise missile with a nuclear warhead”.
    And in these components they will catch up wink

    you know what’s most interesting in the last decade. Regular nodding to the American "review." And what is still characteristic, as arguments, each time repeating what is already in the newspaper or where else they wrote. For "sports interest", the authors of such publications would take and read this review. Just a hundred pages. True to the enemy mov. But there’s always a “translator” at hand
    A few comments on the above post, dear You Vlad..
    Only a very advanced media analyst could find calls for buildup in this review of nuclear weapons. There are certain statements regarding tactical nuclear weapons, and even in the context that Russia mainly relies on them.

    Indeed, the review of low-power charges is about the fact that it considers the need for Trident missiles to replace existing warheads with less powerful ones. It is. But the Americans are well aware that missiles of this type are part of the US strategic nuclear forces and the ceilings of the START-3 treaty extend to them. Therefore, we are not talking about additional charges or additional missiles. Only a possible replacement.
    Next, the latest in this review. There among the carriers of strategic nuclear weapons three systems are mentioned
    1. The new strategic bomber B-21
    2. New SSBNs such as Columbia with new missiles. Conditional name so far "Trident E-6." In addition, it is possible that at the first stage on these boats the current Trident D-5 can be used
    3. New ICBMs (the conventional name is “Minuteman-4”)

    the truth is not clear why this causes such a flurry of emotions among our observers? Arsenal is being modernized. We are also ready to launch new boats, including and with Husky type SLBMs (or not?)
    We are going to have a new PAK DA bomber in the coming years. Or not? Not talking about the new SARMAT rocket (I don’t touch others) .. just like ours, the Americans will deploy these systems, writing off the old ones. so here, on these components they don’t catch us.

    Some other things are interesting, the details of which we are trying to skip. In particular, about the new cruise missile with nuclear warheads. Work on this warhead will begin in fiscal 2019. the first warheads should be released in fiscal year 2025, and finally full production will be completed no earlier than 2032. . The situation is similar with their new tactical bomb B61-12. The first sample should be presented in 2020, production is completed in 2025. As for the new warheads that the Americans plan to adopt and replace with them the entire range of existing ones, the first production warheads may appear no earlier than 2030. Fortunately for us, as a result of the euphoria of the 90s, they abandoned their weapons and nuclear complex and must now catch up. And the main factor is not money, but time
    1. 0
      12 February 2018 02: 40
      I enjoyed reading your article, thanks hi
      Quote: Old26
      And the main factor is not money, but time

      I completely agree. And a lot of time ..
  14. +1
    12 February 2018 10: 51
    Quote: you Vlad
    I enjoyed reading your article, thanks hi
    Quote: Old26
    And the main factor is not money, but time

    I completely agree. And a lot of time ..

    Yes, it’s ridiculous to read now, but the Americans specifically burst in the 90s. And only now they are beginning to get out of this state.
    But if not all of us, then the majority, thought that they would somehow save everything, unlike us. Nevertheless, the mentality affects. Considering themselves to be exceptional, they could not even imagine in a nightmare that Russia, which arose on the ruins of the Union, with a ruined economy and suddenly could keep its weapons and nuclear complex in working condition. Even reducing the number of military reactors.
    And the conclusion of the Gor-Chernomyrdin agreement generally reassured them. Still would. Russians do not just sell uranium extracted from warheads, but in order to fulfill these agreements on the processing of highly enriched uranium into low enriched uranium, we were FORCED to purchase natural uranium for such "disengagement" in other countries. Its natural for these purposes was trite enough.
    And we reacted only to the price, saying that we "lost" in the price, that we were "shod." And as a result, uranium enrichment plants were supposed to go into operation in the USA in 2005, but even in 2013 they still had enormous problems. In fact, they didn’t have anything except experimental production. Here it is now. To establish the serial production of new plutonium charges for new warheads, they need time. About 10 years and a certain, by no means a small amount of money. But if they can solve the issue with money, then time is beyond their control. They used to just physically not be able to do this
    1. 0
      12 February 2018 17: 15
      Quote: Old26
      But if not all of us, then the majority, thought that they would somehow save everything, unlike us. Nevertheless, the mentality affects. Considering themselves exceptional, they could not even imagine in a nightmare,

      Well, you should not suspect them hi They just invested in something else!
      What prevented the United States from conquering Russia? Unacceptable losses! As soon as they calculate that they can conquer us with acceptable losses, I have no doubt they will attack! So, they invested in suppressing our nuclear component and leveling our retaliatory strikes and invested huge money into it! Well, they just didn’t have time, and as luck would have it, Russia didn’t fall apart request ! We had the brains and the will of the leadership to stop these threats by developing and putting into operation new strategic nuclear weapons, which led to the fact that in the near future a retaliatory strike with 100% probability will lead the United States out of history. For me, GDP is one of those who have achieved this. (Well, it's not for the elections, I just really think so) feel
  15. 0
    12 February 2018 18: 46
    who do you upload these interviews to ?! the arms race has never ended and will always be.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"