Military Review

Chemezov allowed the possibility of supplying C-400 to the USA

181
The head of the corporation "Rostec" Sergey Chemezov made it possible for the US to sell Russian C-400 Russian-Aerospace Corps, if the Americans express such a desire, RIA News.




A journalist from the Washington Post asked Chemezov, “What is the strategic goal of selling Russian C-400 systems to Turkey,” which is a member of NATO. The agreement of the parties on this issue became known in September last year.

C-400 is not a system for attack, it is a defensive system. We can sell it to the Americans if they want. So there are no problems in terms of strategy. And I do not see any problems for Russia in terms of security. On the contrary, if a country is able to protect its airspace, it will feel more secure. And those who intend to attack such a country will think twice
answered the head of the corporation.

According to him, today many countries would like to have such weapons, so the demand for it is great.

Recall, the S-400 Triumph is a long-range anti-aircraft missile system. Designed to destroy aviation, cruise and ballistic missiles, including medium range. The range of the S-400 reaches 400 kilometers, it is capable of destroying targets at an altitude of up to 30 kilometers. It has been in service with the Russian army since 2007.
Photos used:
http://wallpapers.99px.ru
181 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mar.Tirah
    Mar.Tirah 11 February 2018 08: 11
    +15
    I wish our “partners” across the ocean had such thoughts in relation to Russia. Why aren’t they bending so?
    1. vlad66
      vlad66 11 February 2018 08: 18
      +66
      S-400 is not a system for attack, it is a defensive system. We can sell it to the Americans if they want to.

      Completely fucked or what? fool fool fool
      1. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 11 February 2018 08: 25
        +48
        Quote: vlad66
        Completely fucked or what?
        - I don’t see anyone “fucked” here. And this is simply the highest degree of bullying. Over pindosikami ... Respect! (You imagine the condition of the Americans when they are SUCH offered).
        1. Grigory_45
          Grigory_45 11 February 2018 09: 06
          +41
          Quote: oldseaman1957
          And this is simply the highest degree of bullying. Over pindosikami

          Really? In my opinion, Chemezov froze one of the greatest nonsense. It becomes immediately clear - Russia is ready to sell any technology, even to a potential enemy.
          I would have pulled Chemezov for the tongue in the United States. Took - and would have bought. And there was no shame. This is a brilliant operation - no need to strain your intelligence. connection - the enemy himself is ready to sell! One must answer for such words - they wouldn’t sell it - Chemezov would have taken out a catapult from a chair, sold it - even worse. Our people, in general, are not so. It is clear to everyone that the Triumph Yankees would not buy for combat use, but for comprehensive study. And working out countermeasures. And no need to bow to anyone. Put it on the Edwards - and drive as much as you like. And Russia would be in the place where they are sitting.
          Words about "thin trolling" are for complacency. But the meaning is simple - money does not smell. And to our ears - they say, the weapon is defensive. So, like, they’re not being used against us. Yeah, right now ...
          1. Thrall
            Thrall 11 February 2018 09: 15
            +3
            Will not reach the USA smile
            1. Lexus
              Lexus 11 February 2018 12: 14
              +5
              And if from Chukotka to Alaska, with Chemezov as a "useless" load?
          2. aleks26
            aleks26 11 February 2018 10: 53
            +6
            Quote: Gregory_45
            Really? In my opinion, Chemezov froze one of the greatest nonsense. It becomes immediately clear - Russia is ready to sell any technology, even to a potential enemy.

            Chemezov can promise anything. Questions to whom to sell, and to whom not decides not he.
            1. Grigory_45
              Grigory_45 11 February 2018 12: 19
              +9
              Quote: aleks26
              Questions to whom to sell, and to whom not decides not he.

              By itself. However, it is not appropriate for a person of such rank to make such statements (in fact, on behalf of Russia). He either does not occupy his chair and does not cherish him much, or that it says "there is no smoke without fire" - draw conclusions. This is the welder Uncle Vasya broadcasts - selling the latest air defense systems, inexpensive! The level is completely different. Until recently, I did not believe that the S-400 would be sold to the Turks and sincerely considered those actions a bluff. After that I’m not particularly surprised - I just resent
            2. Alf
              Alf 11 February 2018 22: 13
              +3
              Quote: aleks26
              Chemezov can promise anything. Questions to whom to sell, and to whom not decides not he.

              For such an offer, with a bloody tyrant, he would have already been lying at the bulging wall.
              P.S. In a neighboring article, I mentioned a couple of days ago that the modern Russian government would sell anything and to anyone for money. I was thrown with rags, they say, how can you think so badly. The idea is already thrown ..
          3. Dart2027
            Dart2027 11 February 2018 11: 11
            +6
            Quote: Gregory_45
            Took - and would have bought. And there was no shame. This is a brilliant operation - no need to strain your intelligence. connection - the enemy himself is ready to sell!

            The export version and what is in service with yourself are two big differences.
            1. Grigory_45
              Grigory_45 11 February 2018 12: 21
              +4
              Quote: Dart2027
              The export version and what is in service with yourself are two big differences.

              is it so? This is one system, the differences are not fundamental. Yes, it can be "stabbed" in character, and then quite a bit. But this is the same system. Do you seriously consider that the export S-400 is the ancient S-75 in a new package?
            2. Grigory_45
              Grigory_45 11 February 2018 12: 47
              +4
              Quote: Dart2027
              The export version and what is in service with yourself are two big differences.

              Not always. Sometimes a foreign customer received equipment in a better configuration than his own Army. For example, Azerbaijani BMP-3. Or Chinese Su-35S, which are almost identical in configuration for the native Air Force.
              It was in the USSR - a priori, export military equipment was worse in performance than for itself and true friends. In Russia - not a fact.
              Can you give the data of the export S-400? I would like to clearly see why it is worse.
              1. Dart2027
                Dart2027 11 February 2018 14: 46
                0
                Quote: Gregory_45
                This is one system, the differences are not fundamental.

                As they say, "the devil is in the details." It is these details that are key.
                Quote: Gregory_45
                In Russia - not a fact.

                As far as I know, basically the same principle is used now.
                1. Grigory_45
                  Grigory_45 11 February 2018 16: 25
                  +3
                  Quote: Dart2027
                  As far as I know, basically the same principle is used now

                  not in everything and not always. I have already given examples. The Chinese got a complete analogue of the Russian Su-35S, and the Azerbaijani BMP-3s left with the latest sights.
                  What can be changed in the air defense system so that it differs significantly from the version "for oneself"? Maybe all the same, tell us about the export S-400, for clarity?
                  1. Dart2027
                    Dart2027 11 February 2018 20: 58
                    0
                    Quote: Gregory_45
                    What can be changed in the air defense system so that it differs significantly from the version "for oneself"?

                    Electronics, or rather algorithms.
                    Quote: Gregory_45
                    The Chinese got a complete analogue of the Russian Su-35S, and Azerbaijani BMP-3s left with the latest sights
                    If they write about the analogue, then there are already differences, and the BMP-3 has so many modifications that they’ll break their leg. We do not have an exact list of equipment that was supplied.
                    1. Grigory_45
                      Grigory_45 11 February 2018 22: 52
                      +1
                      Quote: Dart2027
                      If they write about the analogue, then there are already differences

                      yeah plates in chinese
                      Quote: Dart2027
                      BMP-3 has so many modifications that they damn leg break. We do not have an exact list of equipment that was supplied.

                      I had the honor to work at the enterprise that produces BMP-3, and which vehicles were shipped to which customer - in the know.
                      Quote: Dart2027
                      Quote: Gregory_45
                      What can be changed in the air defense system so that it differs significantly from the version "for oneself"?
                      Electronics, or rather algorithms.

                      There is no such thing. They can only change the equipment. For example, do not turn on the low-altitude detector, cut down the composition of the division, and do not turn on some types of missiles. But the main base, in which the whole chip, always remains the same.
                      In tanks, they can deliver the DZ of the previous generation, do not include the latest ammunition in the BC. But nobody spoils the design of the tank.
                      Only arms models that fall under international agreements differ significantly. For example, cruise missiles. The Russian and export "Caliber" differs significantly (in range - at times, as well as in the type of warheads), OTRK "Iskander" - too. There is nothing for the buyer to do - either buy, or stay with your nose, or do it yourself. SAMs are not included in the list of offensive weapons, are not limited by treaties, and differences in them from the basic versions cannot be significant
                      Or bring me the characteristics of the export S-400, I will gladly admit that I am wrong
            3. Don
              Don 11 February 2018 13: 34
              +3
              Quote: Dart2027
              The export version and what is in service with yourself are two big differences.

              There is of course a slight difference, but not significant. In modern Russia, it so happened that weapons for export often have better characteristics than those that go to the native army. This is due to the lag in the domestic defense industry in areas such as microelectronics, etc. For example, the purchase of French thermal imagers.
              1. Dart2027
                Dart2027 11 February 2018 14: 47
                0
                Quote: Donskoy
                weapons for export have better characteristics than those that go to the native army. This is due to the lag in the domestic defense industry in areas such as microelectronics, etc. For example, the purchase of French thermal imagers.

                I did not quite understand how it is connected, that we do not manufacture some equipment, alas, that is, that is, with the characteristics of what is exported.
                1. Mih1974
                  Mih1974 11 February 2018 15: 09
                  +1
                  This was clearly visible on 08/08/08 when the Georgian T-72 tanks were grabbed after "handling by yavery." It turned out that there were good French thermal imagers and even a friend-or-foe recognition system. We are not allowed to “stoop” to such a thing and they will not sell us good equipment, it will be like with the French “exoscetes” most of which “suddenly stopped working” against the British.
                  1. Dart2027
                    Dart2027 11 February 2018 21: 01
                    0
                    Quote: Mih1974
                    It turned out that there were good French thermal imagers and even a friend-or-foe recognition system

                    I don’t know how this is with them, I’m talking about ours.
          4. the most important
            the most important 11 February 2018 12: 59
            +12
            Quote: Gregory_45
            In my opinion, Chemezov froze one of the greatest nonsense

            Can you find at least someone adequate on that Olympus ??? Turkey shot down our plane, and in response to them the S-400 and even for our credit !!! + nuclear station as a gift! + a piece of Syria under the occupation ... Everyone who is not lazy is bombing our allies, but only the authorities do not see it .... and then from all the programs Kiselyov tells how our authority has risen to BV and the whole world !!! the economy is out, and the prime minister and the government are in chocolate !!
          5. Lacoste
            Lacoste 11 February 2018 15: 19
            0
            Quote: Gregory_45
            Quote: oldseaman1957
            And this is simply the highest degree of bullying. Over pindosikami

            Really? In my opinion, Chemezov froze one of the greatest nonsense. It becomes immediately clear - Russia is ready to sell any technology, even to a potential enemy.
            I would have pulled Chemezov for the tongue in the United States. Took - and would have bought. And there was no shame. This is a brilliant operation - no need to strain your intelligence. connection - the enemy himself is ready to sell! One must answer for such words - they wouldn’t sell it - Chemezov would have taken out a catapult from a chair, sold it - even worse. Our people, in general, are not so. It is clear to everyone that the Triumph Yankees would not buy for combat use, but for comprehensive study. And working out countermeasures. And no need to bow to anyone. Put it on the Edwards - and drive as much as you like. And Russia would be in the place where they are sitting.
            Words about "thin trolling" are for complacency. But the meaning is simple - money does not smell. And to our ears - they say, the weapon is defensive. So, like, they’re not being used against us. Yeah, right now ...

            Well, yes, some ANALiteg with VO knows more precisely to whom to sell which weapon and which not) What are you not in RosOboronExport, boss?)) Ahah)
            1. Grigory_45
              Grigory_45 11 February 2018 16: 15
              +6
              Quote: Lacoste
              Well, yes, some ANALiteg with VO knows more precisely to whom to sell which weapon and which not) What are you not in RosOboronExport, boss?)) Ahah)

              rarely in VO one can find a comment of such a low level. Do you constantly say nonsense, not in essence, or is today a happy exception? It’s even difficult for me to answer something, the coordinate system is different, deeper. I’m used to debate in essence and reasonedly, and discussing the personality of the interlocutor is not at all in my interests.
          6. 178
            178 12 February 2018 01: 49
            0
            Grigory_45 - You are wrong. What is exported is for export and is calculated .. The head is not only for wearing a hat. Ciao
            .
            1. Grigory_45
              Grigory_45 12 February 2018 09: 24
              +1
              why do you use her () head) only as a stand for a hat?
          7. Rus86
            Rus86 12 February 2018 07: 21
            +1
            I welcome you.
            can drive and study in the UAE, or Saudi Arabia, where did they sell it? and sold not by the piece, but how was it sent to China?
            nevertheless, if this is trolling, then it is strong, if the stupidity of effective managers, then sadness. although the grandfather is seasoned.
          8. asv96
            asv96 12 February 2018 11: 21
            0
            Well, you and). Just trolling. Chemezov has no right to sell such systems on his own, without ratification of the government. And so if you are afraid to buy and sleep peacefully.
          9. Genry
            Genry 12 February 2018 11: 50
            0
            Quote: Gregory_45
            In my opinion, Chemezov froze one of the greatest nonsense. It becomes immediately clear - Russia is ready to sell any technology, even to a potential enemy.

            You do not distort. Chemezov offered a product and not technology.
            The Americans are able to make a pipe with wings themselves, but they have problems with mathematics. Judging by the fact that the Chinese, Turks and Indians are not afraid of selling the S-400 - everything is reliably protected there ...
        2. Ascetic
          Ascetic 11 February 2018 11: 57
          +6
          Top trolling good
          can not create your own? Buy from us request
          1. Per se.
            Per se. 11 February 2018 15: 49
            +8
            Quote: Ascetic
            can not create your own? Buy from us
            Somehow not very "trolling", it is difficult to imagine, that way, in 1940, Stalin would suggest a "companion" to Hitler HF with T-34. It’s hard to imagine how the US would sell its F-86 Saber to the Korean War, or air-to-air missiles with a thermal guidance head, that we had, as a trophy, in Vietnam ... Sale of raw materials and Soviet technologies, all over freebies, for which the current government "did not plow, did not sow," sit on suitcases, money is already in the West in foreign banks, squeezed out of Russia, which is possible. Say, poklep, "Kesha good!", I would like to be an optimist, but it does not work. They sold China C-300 and Su-27, got the clones, great, here you are, C-400 and Su-35, dear Chinese "brothers", it's defensive weapons. “No, guys, everything is wrong, everything is wrong, guys” ... Production in capitalist Russia is already far from being like in the USSR, almost piece by piece, to spray power and power on an uncle (along with the transfer of models of modern weapons), when its army not rearmed, stupid, if neither sabotage and sabotage.
        3. The comment was deleted.
      2. Hagalaz
        Hagalaz 11 February 2018 08: 25
        +4
        I am comforting myself with the hope that he knowsingly carries a blizzard. For what purpose, xs.
        1. dorz
          dorz 11 February 2018 11: 02
          0
          Chemezov allowed the United States to sell Russian S-400 air defense systems

          And with this money to buy an aircraft carrier from the Americans, why wait for 2030 sad
      3. INTER
        INTER 11 February 2018 08: 25
        +12
        Quote: vlad66
        Completely fucked or what?

        Rather, he is trolling them and advertising, nothing personal ....
        They question the effectiveness of the weapons of the Americans, if they go for it.
        And these are additional contracts for all types of weapons.
        1. vlad66
          vlad66 11 February 2018 08: 33
          +12
          Quote: INTER
          Rather, he is trolling them and advertising, nothing personal ..

          You also need to troll wisely or else, the presentation of the author’s material is so specific, like before the election, everything is bad, everything is for sale. hi
        2. Kasym
          Kasym 11 February 2018 09: 04
          +21
          S-300 and S-400 air defense systems were sold to two NATO member countries. And such a US ally as the SA sold (or ready to sell). So, if desired, the states will have access to study.
          But the American military-industrial complex will be happy with the Pentagon so that many generals will fly from their posts there. laughing . Such a jackpot is needed by ourselves. Chemezov still had to offer the armor in addition. laughing.
          But seriously, then about 20 years it is necessary that the Americans can create a copy - Russia will go far in this time (the S-500 is on the way). And it is clear that the performance characteristics of exported air defense systems will be different. hi
          1. Grigory_45
            Grigory_45 11 February 2018 09: 55
            +5
            yeah, you still imagine Chemezova for surrendering secrets to potential enemies to the Hero of Russia
          2. Hunter 2
            Hunter 2 11 February 2018 10: 00
            +10
            I have one feeling that yesterday I went over a bit? wassat Or is Chemezov a breakthrough of consciousness? sad
            1. Alf
              Alf 11 February 2018 22: 16
              0
              Quote: Hunter 2
              Or is Chemezov a breakthrough of consciousness?

              No, everything is all right with you, just someone wanted money.
          3. Burbon
            Burbon 11 February 2018 10: 05
            +15
            Quote: Kasym
            But seriously, then 20 years is necessary so that Americans can create a copy

            . fool ..... do you live in pink glasses ?????
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
            2. Kasym
              Kasym 11 February 2018 11: 02
              +3
              Bourbon, this emoticon can be addressed to ru-lu Almaz-Antey. This is his statement, which he brought to Yeltsin regarding the sale of the S-300 to ... USA - this was the intention of the EBN and he called him for consultations.
              "In order to reveal the algorithms for the operation of the S-300 complex, it will take 15-20 years, and this is if they will attract ... the Chinese."
              Look for his interview on Shock Force. yes
              By the way, the Chinese could not fully copy the S-300. Their counterpart is HQ-9. Maybe that's why they sold the S-400, what do you think?
              1. Burbon
                Burbon 11 February 2018 11: 38
                +1
                Quote: Kasym
                Bourbon, this emoticon can be addressed to ru-lu Almaz-Antey. This is his statement,

                his statement - is the ultimate truth ?? belay ...Oh well....
                1. Kasym
                  Kasym 11 February 2018 13: 35
                  +2
                  Bourbon, you will argue with the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, gene. design "NIEMI" of Almaz-Antey Concern "Veniamin Pavlovich Efremov? Developer S-300V, Antey-2500, Osa and Torah-M1! Well, well, I would love to see that. laughing
                  SAM and its target detection, capture and tracking systems work in automatic mode - you can imagine what kind of software you need. For example, the United States still (according to media reports) cannot bring its software (software) to its F-35 - and how many years have passed ?! Moreover, there should be a certain level of trust between the buyer and seller, since it is necessary to synchronize everything with the system OWN-ALIEN - I hope you know what it is. The United States will not accept such a transfer, so it will be up to them to do it themselves.
                  "... The secret is not even in the design of the air defense system, but in the algorithms of its operation ... Counterintelligence did not give the go-ahead for the sale of the S-300V ... The United States ultimately refused to purchase this complex themselves ..." I wrote where the information came from. The series is called "Lord of the heavens" - specially revised. So who needs to twist at the temple? No longer ham, young, otherwise no one here will communicate with you.
                  1. Burbon
                    Burbon 11 February 2018 13: 45
                    +1
                    Quote: Kasym
                    No longer hamie

                    belay .... where? .. when ... to whom ?? .. laughing
                    Quote: Kasym
                    young

                    Is that a compliment? wassat
                    Quote: Kasym
                    otherwise, nobody here will communicate with you.

                    can i already start getting nervous?
                    Quote: Kasym
                    Bourbon, you will argue with the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, gene. design "NIEMI" concern Almaz-Antey "Veniamin Pavlovich Efremov? Developer S-300V, Antey-2500, Wasp and Torah-M1!

                    I repeat again .... his words are an axiom? .. doesn’t require evidence, you just have to take a word? ......
                  2. Grigory_45
                    Grigory_45 11 February 2018 14: 09
                    0
                    Quote: Kasym
                    "... The secret is not even in the design of the air defense system, but in the algorithms of its operation ...

                    let's believe. How is the algorithm implemented? Through hardware and software. If they are in the hands of the enemy, then “uncovering the secrets of the algorithm” is a matter of technique, skill and time. No more.
                    Quote: Kasym
                    SAM and its target detection, capture and tracking systems work in automatic mode - you can imagine what kind of software you need.

                    this is how all modern air defense systems work. What's so unusual?
                    Quote: Kasym
                    For example, the United States still (according to media reports) cannot bring its software (software) to its F-35 - and how many years have passed ?!

                    What exactly can not? Does the plane not fly? Cannot use weapons? Or just sometimes the system gives false messages? So these are trifles, they will bring. On the other side, programmers are also good. And many of our former compatriots
              2. Grigory_45
                Grigory_45 11 February 2018 14: 05
                +1
                Quote: Kasym
                By the way, the Chinese could not fully copy the S-300. Their counterpart is HQ-9. Maybe that's why they sold the S-400, what do you think?

                And you do not compare the Chinese with the Americans and Israelis. Their level and capabilities are completely different. And who needs to copy the S-400? It is necessary to work out a complex of measures to counteract, in order to reduce its effectiveness, in fact, depreciate as an air defense system
          4. Amurets
            Amurets 12 February 2018 23: 33
            0
            Quote: Kasym
            But seriously, then about 20 years it is necessary that the Americans can create a copy - Russia will go far in this time (the S-500 is on the way). And it is clear that the performance characteristics of exported air defense systems will be different.

            Yeah and the S-350 Vityaz is massively going to the air defense system for three years now.
        3. Grigory_45
          Grigory_45 11 February 2018 09: 07
          +2
          Quote: INTER
          They question the effectiveness of the weapons of the Americans

          how?
          1. Pereira
            Pereira 11 February 2018 09: 41
            +2
            Publications on the Internet. No other methods have been invented.
            1. Grigory_45
              Grigory_45 11 February 2018 09: 59
              +3
              Quote: Pereira
              Publications on the Internet. No other way invented

              Truth? And I naively thought it was real exploitation. Shooting at the firing range, as close as possible to combat. Combat use. But it turns out .. Then I propose not to delay the adoption of the S-1000. Make a cardboard layout in two days and roll up a bunch of enchanting articles telling about the phenomenal characteristics of cardboard technology. And to all requests to "touch" or "shoot" to answer one thing - "secret!"
              1. aleks26
                aleks26 11 February 2018 10: 58
                0
                Amepikos do just that. Hanging noodles on the ears of a potential adversary is also an effective method of weakening the adversary = remember at least SDI
              2. Thunderbolt
                Thunderbolt 11 February 2018 11: 11
                +3
                Quote: Gregory_45
                Then I suggest not delaying the adoption of the S-1000.

                First, you accept a long-range missile for the S-400, and then joke about the S-1000.
        4. Stas157
          Stas157 11 February 2018 09: 46
          +4
          Quote: INTER
          Rather, he is trolling them and advertising, nothing personal ....

          And the sale of S-400 to Turkey and China, also trolling?
      4. 210ox
        210ox 11 February 2018 08: 43
        +5
        Money doesn’t smell. Yes, and the socio-political system contributes .. Partners and that's it .. No.
        Quote: vlad66
        S-400 is not a system for attack, it is a defensive system. We can sell it to the Americans if they want to.

        Completely fucked or what? fool fool fool
        1. Evgeniy667b
          Evgeniy667b 11 February 2018 09: 25
          +4
          Chemezov thinks only about money. For him, everything is a commodity. Any weapons, territories, population of these territories. For such matters, oh, how to lean against the wall and make a hole in the hostile Bosko until the foreshmak comes out of it. But this rubbish keeps the Supreme Civil Code informed, and he silently approves !!! Those same Americans at first saturate their army, and only then the Papuans, and very often second-hand and even second-hand / second-hand .. Apparently the "multi-way GDP" is to sell everything slowly, and then you don’t have to fight with whom, only with his people.
          1. ul_vitalii
            ul_vitalii 11 February 2018 09: 36
            +8
            And I think that he simply mocked the Americans, let them say they will stand in line, our technique is better. smile
            1. Evgeniy667b
              Evgeniy667b 11 February 2018 09: 40
              +2
              Not the fact that ours is better, if only with the media. No one has ever seen her in business. Yes, we have no analogues in the world, starting with a shovel.
              1. vlad66
                vlad66 11 February 2018 10: 11
                +9
                Quote: Evgeniy667b
                Nobody has seen her in business yet.

                Ask Shoigu, let him engage, well, for example in Syria. He will flood a couple of letaki coalition mattresses for example. laughing At the same time, you’ll see in business. wink
                Quote: Evgeniy667b
                Yes, we have no analogues in the world, starting with a shovel.

                But where are we going to go, I’ll go to drive the bear out of the entrance, the bear got drunk, he’s strumming on the balalaika, it scares the neighbors. wassat
              2. sabakina
                sabakina 11 February 2018 11: 04
                +4
                Quote: Evgeniy667b
                Yes, we have no analogues in the world, starting with a shovel.
                Actually in the world, no one realizes that MSL can be killed. And if you also imprison her ....
                1. Thunderbolt
                  Thunderbolt 11 February 2018 12: 12
                  +2
                  Quote: sabakina
                  Actually in the world, no one realizes that MSL can be killed. And if you also imprison her ....

                  Of course, they are all “dumb”, although they invented the MPL.
                  “... Now a new fashion has begun to go on the attack: some take only hand grenades and a shovel with them. A sharpened shovel is a lighter and more versatile weapon, it can not only be poked from below, under the chin, it can be chopped off first and foremost with it. The blow is more weighty, especially if applied to the side, at an angle between the shoulder and neck; then you can easily dissect a person to the very chest. "
                  E.M Remarque. “On the Western Front Without Change”
                2. Grigory_45
                  Grigory_45 11 February 2018 17: 00
                  0
                  Quote: sabakina
                  Actually in the world, no one realizes that MSL can be killed. And if you also imprison her ....

                  Actually, MPL, small infantry shovel
                  It was invented by the Danish officer Mads Linnemann, back in 1870. The use of a shovel as a weapon became compelled to
                  period of the first world war. The Germans used them ..
      5. SHURUM -BURUM
        SHURUM -BURUM 11 February 2018 09: 57
        +3
        Once already mocked, passed all the little things in the new American embassy. I believe that the fashion of draining Americans' secrets "undercover" has returned. Another version is the purchase of indulgences at such a price for stealing friends.
      6. Burbon
        Burbon 11 February 2018 10: 03
        +3
        Quote: vlad66
        Completely fucked or what?

        why suddenly? ..... the Turks can .... everyone can ... and this cannot ?? .... s-400 and this is a commodity .... and it must be sold !!!! .. ...
        1. vlad66
          vlad66 11 February 2018 10: 07
          +7
          Quote: Burbon
          why suddenly? ..... the Turks can .... everyone can ... and this cannot ?? .... s-400 and this is a commodity .... and it must be sold !!!! .. ...

          You can sell everything Dmitry hi But if Chemezov followed the language and thought what else to say. hi
          1. Burbon
            Burbon 11 February 2018 10: 16
            +1
            Quote: vlad66
            But if Chemezov followed the language and thought what else to say.

            but this is not his work ..... he is a talking head and no more
          2. spiriolla-45
            spiriolla-45 11 February 2018 11: 41
            0
            But what do you propose to trade in Tihar, as in the 90s, so we have now publicity.
      7. Evil543
        Evil543 11 February 2018 10: 16
        +4
        Damn, I read the headline, I almost choked, my uncle is not friends at all.
        1. dSK
          dSK 11 February 2018 11: 13
          +4
          Quote: Sergey Chemezov
          S-400 is not a system for attack, it is a defensive system.
          Will the States test it at our SU in Syria?
      8. mr.Evil
        mr.Evil 11 February 2018 11: 39
        0
        That everyone is so sensitive is just trolling. If the US military wants to buy the S-400, Congress will ban them. For them, this is humiliation.
      9. spiriolla-45
        spiriolla-45 11 February 2018 11: 39
        +5
        They are there, in the Kremlin, everyone on the dough was led, they are ready to sell their mother. They will also give Satan, the Bulava, and Calibra cheaply. But what, the market, there's nothing to be done, you need to bail out partners.
      10. Juborg
        Juborg 11 February 2018 11: 40
        +2
        Quote: vlad66
        S-400 is not a system for attack, it is a defensive system. We can sell it to the Americans if they want to.

        Completely fucked or what? fool fool fool


        Maybe we’ll also sell our ICBMs to them, well, in a friendly way !? Is he crazy or an inquiring mind does not give rest language ??? laughing
        1. vlad66
          vlad66 11 February 2018 11: 51
          +8
          Quote: juborg
          Maybe we’ll also sell our ICBMs to them, well, in a friendly way !? Is he crazy or an inquiring mind does not give rest language ???

          ICBM is like Yuri's lineup! hi Not a bit surprised by this. And his tongue will not bring to good. request You need to think that it bells. hi
  2. Father of a Soldier
    Father of a Soldier 11 February 2018 08: 16
    +4
    No, these are official’s fantasies, from the category, we can also buy "patriots" in return, such a kiss in the coming decades is basically impossible, there is a US strategy where their opponents are identified and pressure on Russia will be economic, sports, political on all fronts .
    1. Yuri Y.
      Yuri Y. 11 February 2018 10: 44
      0
      Yes, this is not fantasy. Normal advertising. No one will buy the S-400 there, if only to learn the technology, no one will buy the Petriot from us (the same considerations). If others buy, these are our benefits. Economics (revenue), politics (even more importantly, send to FIG). For any, our benefit. By tradition, the sale of our technology is lower than what we have (S-500).
    2. spiriolla-45
      spiriolla-45 11 February 2018 11: 44
      +1
      They will buy S-400, but they will not sell theirs to us. Though they are moral ur * dy, they will not substitute their country. Only our masturbates can do this.
      1. Yuri Y.
        Yuri Y. 11 February 2018 14: 19
        0
        How not to sell it. MORE and impose on everyone. With the desire for these "all" technology and acquire, without benefit to the manufacturer.
  3. masyanya
    masyanya 11 February 2018 08: 19
    +6
    as I understand it ... they don’t smell !!!
    good day to all !!! love
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 11 February 2018 10: 26
      +2
      Mutually !!! love I’m thinking: Chemezov - a troll or just reading a piece of paper? what
      1. masyanya
        masyanya 11 February 2018 10: 29
        +4
        Pasha, howdy there! love glad to see you! love
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Chemezov - a troll or just reading a piece of paper?

        Do you think the thought process is completely absent? lol
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 11 February 2018 10: 32
          +2
          Note: I didn’t say it, but thought about it! good
  4. Observer2014
    Observer2014 11 February 2018 08: 21
    +7
    The head of the Rostec corporation, Sergey Chemezov, allowed the United States to sell Russian S-400 air defense systems,
    A long-standing Russian tradition of believing that all people are brothers and being friends until self-forgetfulness. The truth is sober in such cases comes very quickly. And it turns out that the Russians, as always, were simply used.
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 11 February 2018 08: 22
    +8
    Trolling of the highest level.
    This would mean that the United States signed its backlog in military technology. And we are that we have the next generation ready. Superior to the previous. Therefore, you can safely offer With 400 amers. They will never buy it. We would have offered them Su 57th. Ha... laughing
    1. garnik
      garnik 11 February 2018 08: 56
      +3
      I think that if they want, they can surpass us S-400. Why them? They do not intend to defend themselves. All NATO countries and their allies have gathered around us, and they have enough of Petriot.
    2. Grigory_45
      Grigory_45 11 February 2018 09: 28
      +5
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      We would have offered them Su 57th. Ha.

      Is funny I would buy the Yankees in place.
      And if in the USA someone hit his head very hard and offered Russia to buy their F-22 and F-35, as well as B-2, then you need to find money and buy, take it apart and screw it in every way
      Why did the Yankees refuse to supply L-lease B-17 bombers during World War II? We really wanted them, twice discussed the possibility of delivery at a high level. They refused. But allies in the literal sense! The whole trick is in the Norden bomb sight, which almost a billion were dangled, and which was objectively the best bomb sight in the world at that time. A mechanical computer with autopilot! The Yankees understood that they would tighten our level very, very strongly. Therefore, they did not.
      Or estimate such a situation. There is a war in Vietnam. And the USSR suddenly declares to the American president - let's sell the S-75 air defense system to you? This is for defense! And American pilots would not have to risk themselves, trying to take off the characteristics of the complex in a combat situation, spend money on special UAV reconnaissance, and Pentagon specialists even develop a plan to steal a sample of the Soviet anti-aircraft missile!
      1. AFHENOGEN
        AFHENOGEN 11 February 2018 10: 57
        0
        Uuuuuuu how everything is running!
  6. Siberian 1975
    Siberian 1975 11 February 2018 08: 23
    +8
    In my opinion, our officials are ready to give anyone back, just to make money.
    1. Tsoy
      Tsoy 11 February 2018 08: 36
      0
      Quote: Sibiryak 1975
      In my opinion, our officials are ready to give anyone back, just to make money.


      He does not scoff. But why should the USA buy C-400? Want to look to the Turks may apply.
      1. Grigory_45
        Grigory_45 11 February 2018 10: 22
        +1
        Quote: Choi
        They want to see

        they can see it in the photo or at the exhibitions. But in order to really "roll" the complex - you need time and full access to it (to the "hardware", to the software, conducting experiments). It really will or will not allow the party. Yes, and go to the bow .. And here - his. bought for "honestly earned" What you want - then you do
    2. garnik
      garnik 11 February 2018 09: 04
      +4
      Because the official wants to grab more money and move into the camp of a geopolitical adversary. All politicians should not be visiting, only a delegation can be relaxed. Prohibit accounts with foreign banks and the purchase of real estate abroad. Maybe after that, these patriots will be able to break into power.
      1. ul_vitalii
        ul_vitalii 11 February 2018 09: 44
        +6
        He scoffs at the Americans, our superiority in technology shows, but why salaries at defense plants are not so hot, this is another matter.
  7. populist
    populist 11 February 2018 08: 23
    +5
    The head of the Rostec corporation Sergey Chemezov admitted the possibility of the United States selling Russian S-400 air defense systems
    Absolutely in the Kremlin they went crazy from greed. wassat
  8. ltc35
    ltc35 11 February 2018 08: 25
    +1
    He simply joked to show everyone that the systems are so good that the Americans are so far away. Naturally, such a thing will not be sold to our partners, and potential buyers will once again think what to take: mattresses or our complexes. There is nothing to argue and curse about.
    1. Odysseus
      Odysseus 11 February 2018 08: 53
      +5
      Quote: ltc35
      He simply joked to show everyone that the systems are so good that the Americans are so far away.

      Amid the sale of the S-400 to Turkey and Saudi Arabia, this does not look like a joke.
      Rather, this is another attempt to lick the boots to the "partners" showing their peace.
      1. Pereira
        Pereira 11 February 2018 09: 43
        0
        He would have offered them a liner.
  9. Greenwood
    Greenwood 11 February 2018 08: 29
    +5
    It is interesting that in Soviet times he would have remained in his post for such words ?! request
    1. loginovich
      loginovich 11 February 2018 08: 54
      +4
      It is interesting that in Soviet times he would have remained in his post for such words ?!
      [Quote] [/ quote]

      With Soviet times, everything is clear to me. But the current time is of interest to be awarded or not awarded. I bow to the first option. Bakatin successfully did this, but has not yet been punished.
  10. ASG7
    ASG7 11 February 2018 08: 32
    +4
    And Che is so modest - just the S-400, let’s immediately write that “Poplar”, “Yars” and “Iskander to them, too, the US will begin to sell.
    1. loginovich
      loginovich 11 February 2018 08: 58
      +2
      Uranium is successfully traded.
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Соглашение_об_утили
      plutonium nations
    2. Evgeniy667b
      Evgeniy667b 11 February 2018 09: 35
      0
      Not yet evening!
  11. antiamerikan
    antiamerikan 11 February 2018 08: 36
    +1
    What about Syria and Iran?
    1. garnik
      garnik 11 February 2018 09: 11
      +2
      What about Syria and Iran?

      State advisers object. Medvedev is also a company that is still at the helm in Russia.
  12. bald
    bald 11 February 2018 08: 39
    +8
    Well, of course - grandmas are above all, and they will open the window (for a while) to circumvent their own sanctions. It’s not even that our latest missiles will bypass this complex. But what about Power ?!
    1. spirit
      spirit 11 February 2018 10: 24
      +1
      They will send children to this power and they will spend old age) so the USA is just their power hi
  13. Flatter
    Flatter 11 February 2018 08: 41
    +3
    They sold it to the Turks, which means that it is possible for the Americans too. The main thing is the work algorithms, but they can always reproduce it in iron.
  14. Gardamir
    Gardamir 11 February 2018 08: 44
    +5
    This power is held only due to the fact that it goes around the ears about the war with America. Now what?
  15. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 11 February 2018 08: 45
    +4
    Well, traders ... First, we would have provided our air defense normally!
    Although it would be fun, the United States bought the Russian S-400, and sold their "patriots" all hehe
    Israel is not going to buy there ??? laughing
  16. Steve57
    Steve57 11 February 2018 08: 45
    +2
    Which S-400? They basically do not want to buy a civilian, Be-200, fireman. Although he would help them a lot.
  17. Odysseus
    Odysseus 11 February 2018 08: 49
    +8
    Our huckster’s roof had completely fallen off. It would be better if they provided at least some sort of anti-aircraft defense equipment to our fighters in Syria. So that the Americans would not shoot them like partridges like beating the Wagnerites 3 days ago.
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 11 February 2018 08: 55
      +1
      In addition to 2 people, no one said this. Only Strelkov and Murida do not have any information. I would not believe it.
      1. Odysseus
        Odysseus 11 February 2018 09: 11
        +3
        Quote: Muvka
        In addition to 2 people, no one said this. Only Strelkov and Murida do not have any information. I would not believe it.

        Read completely systemic Semen Pegov. Only the estimate of the number of those killed is different, but the fact of the execution of the convoy and large losses among ours is confirmed.
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 11 February 2018 09: 22
          0
          Share the link. And answer me one simple question. Why is there a photo of the wounded Syrian fighters, is usually full of photos and videos when the terrorists are shown dead, but not a single photo or video is there? A simple, banal and stupid question.
          1. Aleksandr21
            Aleksandr21 11 February 2018 11: 05
            0
            Quote: Muvka
            Share the link. And answer me one simple question. Why is there a photo of the wounded Syrian fighters, is usually full of photos and videos when the terrorists are shown dead, but not a single photo or video is there? A simple, banal and stupid question.


            Then answer you such a question, do you have photos and video materials at every skirmish (for example) of SAA and fighters? Or is there every photo of the departure of our VKS and a photo of the result counting the number of killed militants? Or maybe there is video material where our MTRs are sent on a mission, with the full version of how they left and how they completed the task :) Well, the truth is ridiculous. You are trying with such zeal to prove that everything is fake, there are no losses (s) and ours are the most, but we are only killing enemies with packs. I can’t say anything about Wagner’s PMC and this story because I wasn’t simply interested in it, but I fully admit that this is a real story, and who knows what the situation in Syria really is, and what real losses we are taking there, and not just that that the Ministry of Defense officially publishes when there’s no getting away from photo / video materials.
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 11 February 2018 11: 10
              0
              When something loud happens, there is always material. For example, after this attack there is a photo of the wounded Syrians, but there are no photos of ours. None. Why?
              1. Aleksandr21
                Aleksandr21 11 February 2018 11: 31
                0
                Quote: Muvka
                When something loud happens, there is always material. For example, after this attack there is a photo of the wounded Syrians, but there are no photos of ours. None. Why?


                Should they be? and who was obliged to photograph them, a hired photographer :)? Well, even if there were photos, someone would say and prove that these are ours, the form does not look like, etc. any information can be called into question. Well, there are a lot of options why there aren’t many photos, 1) It’s just that no one was doing this 2) It can be written in their contract, it’s not lit. After all, there are no photos of our MTRs when completing a mission or losses in Syria, we civilians think that for each event there should be photo / video materials, but people are not engaged in photofixing there. 3) This is a fake 4) These photos are somewhere, but they did not get into the public domain. 5) ... 6) you can think of a lot of options. The information that the US was struck at PMCs by Wagner came from various sources. Besides Semen Pegov, whom Odysseus indicated (who really is), I saw the info from Igor Dimitriev, one of the authors of the newspaper Vzglyad. And the newspaper Vzglyad is pro-government .... yes, probably there were other sources, I just was not very interested in this topic.

                By the way, under Russian law, mercenarism is punishable by law, so this should also be taken into account.
                1. Muvka
                  Muvka 11 February 2018 11: 43
                  +1
                  At least give me a link to the post of Semen Pegov. I seriously can’t find it. If you claim that you saw, then you will find it without any problems. So?
                  1. Aleksandr21
                    Aleksandr21 11 February 2018 11: 53
                    0
                    Quote: Muvka
                    At least give me a link to the post of Semen Pegov. I seriously can’t find it. If you claim that you saw, then you will find it without any problems. So?


                    And if you read again what I wrote? “In addition to Semen Pegov, who was indicated by Odysseus (xs the truth who is), I saw Old from Igor Dimitriev, one of the authors of the newspaper Vzglyad” Where is it written that I saw information from Semen Pegov? And about the post of Dimitriev go to Faceebook there he has his own page.
                    1. Muvka
                      Muvka 11 February 2018 11: 58
                      0
                      Sorry, inattentively read. And about the look, the article just came out there. But he refers to an unnamed source. Most likely Strelkova or Murida. And they didn’t get where the Old came from, and the personalities are very ambiguous. I need evidence. I watched flightradar for 3 days. So, on the 9th and 10th, only 1 Il-76 and 1 An-124 landed on Khmeimim and indeed in Syria. And they didn’t take off anymore. And in public infa slipped that the wounded in Moscow. The question is how did they get to Moscow?
                      1. Aleksandr21
                        Aleksandr21 11 February 2018 12: 03
                        0
                        Figs knows him. At your request, too, Semen Pegov tried to find on the Internet, from the livejournal of Elena Donetsk refers to the Telegram channel WarGonzo Semen Pegov. quote: "Information taken from the WarGonzo Telegram channel maintained by war correspondent Semyon Pegov" means this channel is somewhere, since they take information from it, but I honestly could not find it, but in the process of searching I came across an audio recording, here is the link on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFUCpuNlDdk "Those who survived from Wagner PMC shared their impressions" true or not, xs.
                    2. Muvka
                      Muvka 11 February 2018 12: 18
                      0
                      I just found this http://tsear.ch/channel/wargonzo. But the channel is clearly dead. A screen appeared allegedly from Sladkov. But in one group they write that this is a fake. And I can’t find VK Sladkov, nor this message. The only place where the text of this message is searched is in Strelkov’s group. And then on this link I can not find those words.
                      here is a link to search
                      https://yandex.ru/search/?text=%D0%AF%20%D0%BE%D0
                      %B1%D1%89%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%81%D1%8F%20%D1%82%D0%B0%
                      D0%BC%20%D1%81%20%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B1%D1%8F%D1%82%D
                      0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B8%20%D0%B8%20%D0%A7%D0%92%D0%9A&am
                      p; lr = 2
                      Here is a picture
                      1. Muvka
                        Muvka 11 February 2018 12: 34
                        0
                        Here is FB Sladkova. https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100010321
                        843944
                        There is no such message.
                    3. Muvka
                      Muvka 11 February 2018 12: 22
                      0
                      Regarding the audio recording .... Some kind of calm voices. I do not believe this entry. They also write here that in VK Pegov has nothing of the sort. http://www.yaplakal.com/forum35/st/100/topic17391
                      21.html
                      There by the way there are some pictures. Local claim to be photoshop.
                      1. Aleksandr21
                        Aleksandr21 11 February 2018 12: 37
                        0
                        It is rather a matter of faith, whether or not it was. If you try to reason logically, then from most sources citing the US strike on Wagner PMCs, there are one or two that do not have photo materials but they refer to a personal conversation with the Wagner PMC fighters, i.e. they are at least familiar with each other. And then the question arises, why should they lie? In Syria, our PMCs actually operate that help their government, and act (I think so) with the permission of our elite. True, the legislation of the Russian Federation is not completely finalized in this area, but there has recently been news that they want to correct this shortcoming. And the United States could well strike, there is a war going on and each defends his interests. And about photos and videos, they will vryatly appear if our PMC fighters still want to return home not to prison, but simply home.
          2. Odysseus
            Odysseus 11 February 2018 12: 29
            0
            Quote: Muvka
            Share the link.

            You are welcome. https://t.me/wargonzo
            This is Pegov's Telegram. You can read messages if there is one in the Telegram too.
            Briefly if you cannot read them. There are radio communications of ours, and one evaluative judgment about the battle.
            My assessment-negotiations are not very professional, or emotions, or described from other people's words. Strelkov’s estimate of more than 100 killed only ours seems to me to be too high. Since it’s just that if they caught the convoy, everyone (except heavy equipment) is scattered around. True, the terrain is difficult, with shelters tight.
            But here you need to have accurate information.
            Quote: Muvka
            Why is there a photo of the wounded Syrian fighters, is usually full of photos and videos when the terrorists are shown dead, but not a single photo or video is there?

            The answer is simple, because the losses of the enemies show, but there are none. This is normal. During the battle, if you are attacked by the Spector (and he was supposedly there too), you are not up to the pictures. After that, no one will show their corpses. People are strict about this instructed.
            Syrians, yes, you can show, and even then showed only the funeral of 14 people.
            Incidentally, I am not inclined to raise a tantrum if even our losses are as Strelkov says. This is a war. It infuriates me another.
            1) This was done by our American "partners" who so far are absolutely unpunished.
            2) What the hee did our assault convoy send to attack pro-American militants without MANPADS? But it is necessary to tear off your head.
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 11 February 2018 12: 39
              0
              Now look:
              ⚡️ URGENT ⚡️ Records of negotiations on the losses of our PMCs as a result of American fire in Syria ⚡️ Guys sent I can not vouch for the authenticity of the records themselves, but infa in general has long been walking around military circles
              He just threw off the info that he had. But he does not know about its reliability. Also read on. There are many interesting things. And how do you like the obvious fake with the screen of Alexander Sladkov? If this is all true, why make such a fake? Have you seen the pictures with the defeated equipment? This is also a fake - it's Photoshop. In the same telegram channel, this was dismantled.

              Here you have the same thing, only without technology. This is generally Mars.
            2. Muvka
              Muvka 11 February 2018 12: 44
              0
              I would not build conspiracy theology around the @WarGonzo channel simply because it is led by Semyon Pegov, my friend and comrade, with whom we experienced a lot of things shoulder to shoulder in the same trench. And he certainly will not participate in any planned campaign for stuffing dill fakes.

              He was sent notes, he published them. Similar records were sent to me on Friday. But I did not spread them, because I did not know the source. Surely everything that is being thrown in and published should be divided into five, where by ten (Strelkov has already counted more than 600 “two hundred” - this is already beyond). But there is no smoke without fire.

              And there will be no official comments. This, in principle, is world practice. No government in the world has commented on the loss of PMCs.

              As I understand it, Pegov had only one infa - these supposedly negotiations. All. Nothing else. Someone threw them to him. If all this is a fake, they could trite him foolishly.

              WP also write only about pro-government forces.
              https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp
              / 2018/02/08 / pro-government-forces-attack-us-kurd
              ish-troops-in-eastern-syria /? utm_term = .b52603017e
              f0

              It seems to me. They want to fool us. After all, the elections are on the nose.
          3. Jack
            Jack 11 February 2018 17: 46
            0
            Links: https://zen.yandex.ru/media/3mvru/aviaudar-ssha-v
            -sirii-byl-nanesen-po-rossiiskoi-chvk-vagnera-5a7
            e087be86a9e6bc2c0c7cb
            https://vk.com/soldiers_of_fortune
            http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=139611200
            00304
            https://www.infox.ru/news/278/world/politics/1942
            41-ot-udara-amerikancev-v-sirii-pogibli-sotni-ros
            sian-soobsil-igor-girkin? utm_source = infox.sg
            https://lat-elenka.livejournal.com/6263522.html
            http://ru24.online/russia/aviaudar-ssha-po-rossij
            skoj-kolonne-v-sirii-chvk-vagner /
            http://новости-сирии.ru-an.info/новости/сирия-сша
            -and-their-mercenaries-bombed-Syrian-army positions
            /
        2. Muvka
          Muvka 11 February 2018 10: 14
          0
          I found only Yelena Donetsk, who allegedly quotes the words of Semyon Pegov. Drop the link to the original, please. Maybe I don’t understand something? Referring to Telegram WarGonzo. But I Yandex search does not give telegrams, but only VK. But in VK there is nothing like this. Please give a link to this Pegov.
        3. Muvka
          Muvka 11 February 2018 10: 17
          0
          Ok, I found some kind of Telegram:
          http://tsear.ch/channel/wargonzo
          But there are 0 subscribers and 0 publications.
          I still hope you give the link.
  18. Steve57
    Steve57 11 February 2018 08: 55
    +1
    There is no official or actual confirmation of the adoption of the SAM 40N6. Even the information that this missile, on tests showed approximate demand for an ultra-long missile.
    Unfortunately, in fact, we see only PR for about 400 kilometers
  19. alekc75
    alekc75 11 February 2018 09: 25
    0
    Does he pretend to be ????
  20. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 11 February 2018 09: 28
    0
    The head of the Rostec corporation, Sergei Chemezov, allowed the United States to sell the Russian S-400 air defense system if the Americans expressed such a desire

    Marvel, good people, to a bastard, he will kick for a penny in the church
  21. Graz
    Graz 11 February 2018 09: 28
    +1
    if it was a joke, then the joke is stupid
    1. Russia
      Russia 11 February 2018 10: 39
      +8
      Politics, in spite of your sanctions, we are releasing and will be releasing weapons, and as a click on the nose I said what I said.
  22. ochakow703
    ochakow703 11 February 2018 09: 29
    +7
    As a clown, let’s give launch codes from our strategic missiles right away to them, or sell them for a low price. Already, in general, they left the coils from the desire to lick the Western partner's anus.
    1. Falcond
      Falcond 11 February 2018 10: 00
      0
      What will they do with these codes ??)
      1. ul_vitalii
        ul_vitalii 11 February 2018 10: 54
        +8
        For passwords in social networks use. smile
  23. 1 Navigator
    1 Navigator 11 February 2018 09: 36
    +1
    Yes, this is complete idiocy, what is happening ???
    1. Ber
      Ber 11 February 2018 09: 42
      +2
      Yes, this is complete idiocy, what is happening ???


      Like what? Putin’s team shows his face before the election, as there is a saying that a sober mind, a drunk tongue, but it ........
  24. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 11 February 2018 09: 37
    +1
    In how, "allowed the opportunity." And someone (Chemezov) asked about this. You need to be more modest. A lot of ambition, little ammunition.
  25. aszzz888
    aszzz888 11 February 2018 09: 37
    +1
    S-400 is not a system for attack, it is a defensive system. We can sell it to the Americans if they want to.

    Along the way, he declared that he was not doing it. The question is just for what? request
  26. Falcond
    Falcond 11 February 2018 09: 44
    +1
    In modern conditions and taking into account the development of technology, this is on the contrary a direct threat to the United States ... at the right time, the system simply stops working)))

    And so it was normally scrolled ..., I also had to offer to open a service enterprise .. and ascribe our specialists to connections using s-400!)))
  27. askort154
    askort154 11 February 2018 09: 50
    +1
    I don’t understand why you’ve gotten enough? Ready to put Chemezov to the wall. He immediately answered everyone who condemns the export sale of S-300, S-400. Man has a true position in air defense and its support systems, unlike us "devanschiki". In order to answer all at once, he expressed himself figuratively like, we’ll sell to the devil horned (USA), this will not affect the security of our country, but will help our defense industry to develop further. This is the answer to those who are on the principles of the type, let's not sell guns to hunters, otherwise they will kill all our ducks. Then why did we sell Kalash around the world? Were still stored in the "bins." yes
    1. Grigory_45
      Grigory_45 11 February 2018 10: 43
      +4
      Quote: askort154
      In order to answer all at once, he expressed himself figuratively like, we’ll sell to the devil horned (USA), this will not affect the security of our country, but will help our defense industry to develop further. This is the answer to those who are on the principles of the type, let's not sell guns to hunters, otherwise they will kill all our ducks. Then why did we sell Kalash around the world?

      You do not confuse an automatic machine (which some people manage to collect in the garage, and there are millions of them around the world) and a high-tech complex, the basis of the country's air defense - consider it a strategic system. Over which thousands of high-class specialists have worked for more than a dozen years. It turns out that they worked in vain? for the immediate benefit of a gang. So that the enemy finds "holes" in it and in case of aggression the "umbrella" "unexpectedly" turns into a colander? However w!
      We’ll ask the USA, maybe they will sell us the F-22 for inexpensive? And the Spirit? And a couple of aircraft carriers. But what, AR-15s are being sold, even if they will customize the rest, eh? Why are there no such patients in the USA?
  28. Falcond
    Falcond 11 February 2018 09: 58
    +1
    Against Status-6 and the like, even the S-400 is powerless ...
  29. Piramidon
    Piramidon 11 February 2018 10: 15
    +1
    Quote: Odyssey
    Read completely systemic Semen Pegov.

    I would like to read, but among his articles I haven’t found the topic of the death of Wagner anywhere. I would like an address.
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 11 February 2018 10: 20
      0
      Here I am too. All refer to his telegrams, but I found only this, but it is dead
      http://tsear.ch/channel/wargonzo
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 11 February 2018 10: 38
        +1
        Here all these stuffing about the “Wagner” are laid out on shelves.
        Dumbest throw. ALEXANDER ROGERS
        https://news-front.info/2018/02/11/tupejshij-vbro
        s-aleksandr-rodzhers /? utm_source = warfiles.ru

        As the saying goes - look for who benefits from it. This is from the same opera as the death of 100/500 horse-armored Buryats in the Donbass.
    2. flicker
      flicker 11 February 2018 11: 46
      +4
      I would like to read, but among his articles I haven’t found the topic of the death of Wagner anywhere. I would like an address.
      And you will not find, by the way DUCK.
      1. Muvka
        Muvka 11 February 2018 12: 00
        0
        Guys, I have a request for you. Help monitor social networks. After all, if there will be a funeral for the dead (if), then there will be infa in social networks. And if not, then it's definitely a duck.
        1. flicker
          flicker 11 February 2018 17: 43
          +2
          https://rossaprimavera.ru/news/6d5ef744
          In my opinion, the most objective information on this subject
  30. APASUS
    APASUS 11 February 2018 10: 27
    0
    Chemezov allowed the possibility of supplying C-400 to the USA

    What is this nonsense? Have you been smoked there at your leisure? If the Americans need the S-400 then only in the singular, to work out the counteraction, identify weaknesses and abilities to suppress electronic warfare.
    Then it is better to immediately provide drawings ......................
  31. demo
    demo 11 February 2018 10: 32
    +3
    C-400 is not a system for attack, it is a defensive system. We can sell it to the Americans if they want. So there are no problems in terms of strategy. And I do not see any problems for Russia in terms of security. On the contrary, if a country is able to protect its airspace, it will feel more secure. And those who intend to attack such a country will think twice
    answered the head of the corporation.


    Chemezov! Is everything normal with your head?
    I think no. For you consider your "partners" halfwits.
    The United States can buy the system if they need to understand the boundaries and limits of its capabilities.

    And for use in their defensive purposes, to acquire the product of their potential adversary is from the category of high treason.
    A person who allows such an algorithm of thoughts probably comes from his own concepts about protecting the national interests of his country?
    Good people - what is going on here?
    Where to next?
    And do these people forge the sword of defense?

    There are two options for answering who Chemezov is - either an absolutely not smart person, or an absolute mishandled Cossack.
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 11 February 2018 13: 01
      0
      Quote: demo
      There are two options for answering who Chemezov is - either an absolutely not smart person, or an absolute mishandled Cossack.

      I think that not Chemezov decides what to sell to whom. Or does he have his own weapons shop?
      1. Grigory_45
        Grigory_45 11 February 2018 13: 16
        0
        Quote: Piramidon
        I think that not Chemezov decides what to sell to whom. Or does he have his own weapons shop?

        Especially not to give comments. Sent to the address - to those who make decisions. Let them be explained. Language why bother? Like, he’s witty joking, like Reagan liked (on August 11, 1984, broadcasting live “My compatriots are Americans, I’m glad to inform you today that I signed a decree declaring Russia illegal for all eternity. The bombing will begin in five minutes”) Very it turned out witty, only for some reason in the USSR (and other countries) such subtle humor was not appreciated. Oh what Buki ((
  32. fa2998
    fa2998 11 February 2018 10: 44
    +1
    Quote: Mar. Tira
    I wish our “partners” across the ocean had such thoughts in relation to Russia. Why aren’t they bending so?

    Yes, because they have something else to sell on the market. And what can our industry offer besides oil and gas? We don’t build airbuses, cars, civilian ships, and sell anything. First, we’ll spend billions of budget money on developing top-secret weapons, and then we’ll probably sell it to the enemy. Isn't that crazy? ! Previously, intelligence had stolen, stole equipment samples, now print green candy wrappers, they will bring it myself. I think Soon the Armata and the Su-57 will also go over the hill. negative hi
  33. viktor.
    viktor. 11 February 2018 10: 46
    +1
    You can sell, the main thing is that Triumph for Mother Russia works at the right time! wassat
  34. Govorun
    Govorun 11 February 2018 10: 47
    +1
    I wonder how many seconds Comrade Chemezov would have lived if he had lived under Stalin ....
  35. The comment was deleted.
    1. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii 11 February 2018 11: 00
      +7
      Not where you want, and when you need to press, do not sit back on the amber bank hi
      1. Russia
        Russia 11 February 2018 11: 06
        +9
        Ah ... hot Baltic guy, how is the rear axle doing?
  36. AFHENOGEN
    AFHENOGEN 11 February 2018 11: 02
    0
    [quote = Odyssey] [quote = ltc35] He just joked to show everyone that the systems are so good that the Americans are so far away. [/ quote
    Rather, this is another attempt to lick the boots to the "partners" showing their peace.
    Participants such a great experience? I am happy for you.
  37. chenia
    chenia 11 February 2018 11: 02
    +1
    Great idea!!!!

    A couple of bookmarks and our planes cannot be shot down. and the rocket flies from where it flew.
    And earn some money. wassat
  38. Star
    Star 11 February 2018 11: 19
    +3
    Workers working at the plant for the production of these systems, I suppose, have non-disclosure subscriptions and a ban on traveling abroad. For extra talk they can plant. And then on those ...... H .. what is hoping to get to the delegation to accompany these products to America and stay there?
    ..... must be tied to a rocket and run in the direction of America let them catch .... So as not to mock.
  39. groks
    groks 11 February 2018 11: 22
    0
    Ndaaaaaa. Why not sell it? Partners But the title of the article does not correspond in any way.
  40. flicker
    flicker 11 February 2018 11: 39
    +2
    Sometimes you shouldn’t take it literally.
    A Washington Post journalist asked Chemezov, "What is the strategic goal of selling Russian S-400 systems to Turkey," a NATO member.
    Those. Why is Russia selling the S-400 to a potential enemy? You can, of course, answer so that the potential enemy becomes our ally and your enemy, or you can say that the S-400 is just a commodity and you can sleep comfortably, and if anything, then we are ready to sell it to you ... for Alaska, for example ... or something else ...
    1. Grigory_45
      Grigory_45 11 February 2018 13: 05
      0
      Quote: flicker
      Sometimes you shouldn’t take it literally.
      A Washington Post journalist asked Chemezov, "What is the strategic goal of selling Russian S-400 systems to Turkey," a NATO member.
      Those. Why is Russia selling the S-400 to a potential enemy? You can, of course, answer so that the potential enemy becomes our ally and your enemy, or you can say that the S-400 is just a commodity and you can sleep comfortably, and if anything, then we are ready to sell it to you ... for Alaska, for example ... or something else ...

      In the event that the question is uncomfortable or the answer to it can cause a negative or ambiguous reaction, there are two words - No comment. This is how "clear" in response to the dialogue of the layman. It seems like they answered, and at the same time hinted - they will not say anything else. And it’s kind of like to continue on that topic tactfully will not work. Like, everything, the topic is closed.
      Everyone understands that military equipment is bought not only to fight on it. Other motivations are also important - industrial and technological (under the guise of arms they buy a technology transfer), political (want to be friends), corruption (give a bribe in the form of funds for the purchase of weapons, exchange for benefits and concessions in something else).
      1. flicker
        flicker 11 February 2018 17: 50
        +2
        Yes, there can be many reasons. But here, it seems to me, the issue from the political plane was simply transferred to a commercial one, well, like, there is no policy if you want to sell it to you.
  41. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 11 February 2018 12: 10
    +1
    Where would chemezov be if he had expressed such a thing in the USSR?
    But in Russia, freedom of speech and dollars in the eyes.
  42. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 11 February 2018 12: 24
    +5
    Or is it better to sell this Chemezov to the authorities?
  43. Lexus
    Lexus 11 February 2018 12: 27
    0
    Chemezov - verbiage 80 lvl. He would perform in rap battles.
    Anecdote
    A woman who worked for 30 years at the post office, with her tongue, pasted wallpaper in a 3-room apartment.
  44. Muvka
    Muvka 11 February 2018 12: 49
    0
    Aleksandr21,
    Elections on the nose, and that's lying.
    But if they don’t lie, why did they throw Sladkov’s fake comment?
  45. The comment was deleted.
  46. Evgeny Strygin
    Evgeny Strygin 11 February 2018 12: 55
    0
    Well, this one will sell everyone.
  47. Dikson
    Dikson 11 February 2018 13: 48
    +1
    The main driving principle of the current leadership of the country is TO SELL ANYTHING FOR ANYTHING .. And the military-industrial complex is no exception .. Again, nobody is going to live with us under their old age .. - all have houses, plots, villas, - the territory of the alleged enemy .. And the kids there already live with grandparents .. They will sell everything ... The concept of “Homeland, defense, national security does not exist for current leaders .. One stupid animal greed for enrichment and profit. Can't you ban titanium in response to sanctions? Will foreign planes get up? So let's build our own! What drawings have they all sold to the Chinese? Our missiles are falling, but we will still sell engines to a potential (already long ago real !!!) enemy ..)) I don’t even want to think how many products in the Strategic Rocket Forces can actually not fall onto our territory, with such leadership and attitude to state security issues ..
  48. Alex_Rarog
    Alex_Rarog 11 February 2018 13: 57
    0
    Test trolling))) 1000 points!
  49. The Siberian barber
    The Siberian barber 11 February 2018 14: 51
    0
    Ek, how a man suffered, then !!
    Sales seem to be growing!))) Courage caught))
    Here, give free rein, to such managers, so they will sell the whole country, in the bud ...
  50. Augustine Gladyshev
    Augustine Gladyshev 11 February 2018 15: 28
    0
    [b] [/ b] Providing the ENEMIES with any WEAPONS (even of a defensive nature) is a BIG MISTAKE, especially since the USA is LAGS LACK in the NEW missile defense systems, (apparently due to the BASED HABIT to look at other OVERALL).