Military Review

"Typhoon" helped the special forces of the Eastern Military District defeat conditional terrorists

31
During the military exercise on the territory of the Khabarovsk Territory, an armored vehicle "Typhoon" was involved. With its help, it was carried out to cover the special forces detachment, which entered into battle with conditional terrorists. The press service of the Eastern Military District reports that during the special tactical exercise, Tiger armored cars were also used.


From the message press service BBI:
On one of the sections of the route, a group of conditional terrorists set up an ambush, undermining a controlled "landmine" to block the convoy and attacked. The servicemen completed the tasks of dismounting from the Typhoon armored cars, occupying firing positions, and interacting as part of a unit. In the course of the training battle, various tactical techniques were developed for conducting combat in a confined space using standard weapons, including Kalashnikov machine guns, and the "attackers" were destroyed. To create an environment as close to real as possible, a significant amount of imitation tools was used, in particular explosive packages, smoke, idle ammunition.


"Typhoon" helped the special forces of the Eastern Military District defeat conditional terrorists


For reference: Bonded multifunctional modular armored vehicle "Typhoon-K" on the chassis KAMAZ-63968 can carry up to 16 people. The landing of troops from the armored vehicle can be carried out both with the help of a specialized ramp, and through the door. The front of the cab has enhanced reservations that can protect (according to unconfirmed data) from 30-mm ammunition; implemented the ability to install bolshichita, closing the windshield. The car has mine protection. The landing force is able to monitor the operational situation with the help of monitors that display a “picture” from several external video cameras.
Photos used:
https://function.mil.ru
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Teberii
    Teberii 10 February 2018 11: 02
    0
    Protection is necessary to deal with ambushes and undermines of equipment carrying fighters.
    1. Giant thought
      Giant thought 10 February 2018 11: 08
      +4
      Successful all the same, the Typhoon armored car came out with us, now the task is to saturate our army with them.
      1. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov 10 February 2018 11: 20
        0
        Quote: Giant thought
        Successful all the same, the Typhoon armored car came out with us, now the task is to saturate our army with them.

        Kamaz in the deserts drove clearly, winning any race possible! ..Here now dressed in armor!
        Our soldiers need to be protected! soldier Powerful machine definitely ..
        1. ProkletyiPirat
          ProkletyiPirat 10 February 2018 11: 31
          0
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Kamaz in the deserts drove clearly, winning any race possible!

          that's exactly what won, while the organizers did not understand due to what and did not create additional restrictions on the cars of the participants
      2. ProkletyiPirat
        ProkletyiPirat 10 February 2018 11: 46
        0
        Quote: Thought Giant
        Successful all the same, the Typhoon armored car came out with us, now the task is to saturate our army with them.

        And how is he successful? Well, specifically name what? mine protection? bulletproof protection? All this is very good and useful, only there is one small but VERY important nuance, its "price", the point is not that it is "indecently expensive", but that it is "too expensive for the tasks." Yes, buying a couple of dozen, well, a maximum of a couple of hundred pieces for the same military police is not a problem, but as soon as you look at the cost of re-equipping the entire army, your eyes will go to your forehead ... We don’t have that kind of money, and never have and never will.

        We need another machine that would be mass-produced, that is, at least several thousand a year (at least 5 pieces per day).
        1. KVU-NSVD
          KVU-NSVD 10 February 2018 12: 07
          +6
          . Yes, buying a couple of dozen, well, a maximum of a couple of hundred pieces for the same military police is not a problem, but as soon as you look at the cost of re-equipping the entire army, your eyes will go to your forehead ... We don’t have that kind of money, and never have and never will.
          Firstly, nobody is going to “change shoes” on them the whole army. The machine will be used for tasks in the destination and in the units performing these tasks, and in quantities to ensure the performance of these tasks. Secondly: The price of the car is not without distortions, but it is quite normal for such equipment and below foreign analogues.
          We need another machine that would be mass-produced, that is, at least several thousand a year (at least 5 pieces per day).
          To hell?
          1. ProkletyiPirat
            ProkletyiPirat 10 February 2018 17: 44
            0
            Quote: KVU-NSVD
            Firstly, nobody is going to “change shoes” on them the whole army.

            I understood this thought, I completely agree, the reason why they are not going to I indicated earlier
            Quote: KVU-NSVD
            The machine will be used for tasks in the destination and in the units performing these tasks, and in quantities to ensure the performance of these tasks.

            I didn’t understand this your thought, you’ll break your brain while you analyze your flight of thought. This is what the purpose of "intended use". What are the tasks that she will perform?
            1) Transportation of people? - For the army it’s expensive and there is no weapon and can’t swim normally for a piece of military police.
            2) Cargo transportation? (Well, there is fuel, food, ammunition) - it’s insanely expensive for the army, it’s not necessary for the military police, for the Ministry of Emergency Situations and humcon escorts in general an incredibly insane cost.
            3) Placement of special equipment? (Well, for example, KShM, communication vehicles, etc.) - again, it’s insanely expensive for the army, no need for the military police,
            In general, the machine is too narrowly specialized.
            Quote: KVU-NSVD
            .
            We need another machine that would be mass-produced, that is, at least several thousand a year (at least 5 pieces per day).
            To hell?

            To
            a) To ensure unification and maintainability within the same unit. To have two types of trucks (typhoons and ordinary) stupidity, moreover, expensive stupidity
            b) Cheaper through mass production
            c) Cheaper through unification with civilian cars
            d) Cheaper maintenance and repair due to unification with civilian cars (meaning availability of specialists, equipment and components))
            e.1) Creating a reserve of vehicles at the expense of the civil-military sector, for example, the police \ Ministry of Emergencies.
            e.2) Creating a reserve at the expense of the civilian sector (military accounting of equipment)
            1. KVU-NSVD
              KVU-NSVD 10 February 2018 18: 04
              +4
              Scope - transportation of personnel in conditions of local conflicts of low intensity and CTOs (in a big mess, such load machines for the military economy + do not consider losses of military personnel so carefully) does not imply thousands of copies of this combat vehicle. Of course, the ideal is to carry out all transportation in an army fighting in an adult army on such machines, but here is your truth, we won’t be able to SAVE that, and hardly anyone else can hi
              , you’ll break your brain while you analyze your flight of thought.
              This is not to smudge the text. The thought seems to be stated confusingly.
              1. ProkletyiPirat
                ProkletyiPirat 10 February 2018 21: 40
                0
                Quote: KVU-NSVD
                This is not to smudge the text. The thought seems to be stated confusingly.

                This here ITis it confusing? What is "confusing" for you then. Although okay, do not care, we will not produce holivars and offtopics.
                Quote: KVU-NSVD
                does not imply thousandths of runs of this combat vehicle

                Actually, what am I leading the conversation to, Like a fish needs a bicycle? Since many are not needed, and goes for local wars. is it easier to buy an armored personnel carrier? Well, if you do not like "BTR-80 \ 82" that is, a "boomerang". There are mine protection, and bulletproof armor in stock. Yes, and knows how to swim, and even weapons are. Otherwise, it turns out to be insanity to produce MPDs and armored personnel carriers that look different, have different parts, but are used for the same thing.
                1. KVU-NSVD
                  KVU-NSVD 10 February 2018 21: 52
                  +3
                  [quoteAlthough, don’t care, we won’t produce holivars and offtopics.] [/ quote] Yeah. a spherical horse in a vacuum - this is of course bust laughing It's just that in our army they are trying to apply universality to a reasonable extent .. although this sometimes leads to cramming into the unbearable. versatility is good, but ideal is impossible. Good night .....
                  1. ProkletyiPirat
                    ProkletyiPirat 11 February 2018 03: 57
                    0
                    Quote: KVU-NSVD
                    Rosto in our army are trying to apply universality to a reasonable extent .. although this sometimes leads to cramming into the invisible. versatility is good but the ideal is impossible

                    disagree, in my opinion, the ideal is possible, difficult to achieve, but possible, and the fact that it has not been achieved at the moment, as well as the fact of the presence of jambs, speak only about the poor organization of the process of achieving the ideal (1), and / or bad \ insufficient training (2). In the case of all domestic MRAPs, it is safe to say that there is the first, in some cases the second. If you take typhoons specifically, then there is definitely the first, but the second “most likely not” is at least among engineers.
    2. vlad66
      vlad66 10 February 2018 11: 30
      +7
      Capless multifunctional modular armored vehicle "Typhoon-K" on the KamAZ-63968 chassis

      Here is a video you can look at armored vehicles hi
      1. Ased
        Ased 10 February 2018 19: 27
        0
        Quote: vlad66
        "Typhoon" helped the special forces of the Eastern Military District defeat conditional terrorists


        My Lada helped me go for a beer today ...
        Ear syllable cuts me alone?
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 10 February 2018 13: 59
      0
      But didn’t they try to cover the escaping special forces retreating under enemy fire? belay
  2. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 10 February 2018 11: 08
    +5
    capable of protecting (according to unconfirmed reports) from 30 mm ammunition;
    Well .. FIG knows .. if from solitary .. and from long distances ... and at sharp angles ... And bulletproof glass with the same characteristics? I would like to believe, but even 30mm is still 30mm recourse
    1. Sergeant71
      Sergeant71 10 February 2018 13: 35
      0
      According to unconfirmed, sofa data! wassat And the glass even after firing at 7,62 with a core barely holds, not to mention something more powerful. There, only if some blinds are lowered by fire contact and move through the cameras.
      1. KVU-NSVD
        KVU-NSVD 10 February 2018 13: 46
        +3
        if any blinds are lowered by fire contact
        Blinds from 30s? Well, I don’t know ... in my opinion as a dead poultice, well, or I don’t even know from what and FIG knows how thick ...
    2. Grigory_45
      Grigory_45 10 February 2018 20: 38
      0
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      KVU-NSVD Today, 13:08
      capable of protecting (according to unconfirmed reports) from 30 mm ammunition;
      Well .. FIG knows .. if from solitary

      in my opinion, the main parameter is not indicated here - this is the range and type of the projectile. With a couple of kilometers, the OFS can and will tolerate) It seems that in the maximum body kit, the Typhoon should have a "ballistics" of 14,5 mm from 300 meters.
      To protect against a 30-mm armor-piercing projectile (not BOPS!), The forehead on the BMP-3 was multi-layered: 10 mm BT-70Sh (steel armor) + 70 mm air gap + 12 mm BT-70Sh + 60 mm ABT-102 (aluminum armor ) I doubt that there is something similar to this pie on Typhoon.
      1. KVU-NSVD
        KVU-NSVD 10 February 2018 21: 00
        +3
        In-in, and I have doubts - 30 she is 30. although Typhoon is not for the battlefield, but to protect the la / s from mines and ambushes in sluggish conflicts [quote, in my opinion, the main parameter is not indicated here - this is the range and type of projectile. With a couple of kilometers, the OFS can and will tolerate)] [/ quote] And I about the same
        Well .. FIG knows .. if from solitary .. and from long distances ... and at sharp angles ..
        Vague doubts about claim and reality torment
  3. da Vinci
    da Vinci 10 February 2018 11: 24
    0
    It was not enough shown Typhoons in Syria (who used the forces of the Russian Federation), more than simple KAMAZs, which were carrying artillery.
  4. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 10 February 2018 11: 26
    0
    Nonsense about 30-mm shells ... Typhoon has a drawback; he has no protection against cumulative ammunition, that is, a column of such armored cars of 500 tons each can easily be locked somewhere on the march and burned by ATGMs from a distance of 1- 2 km, and they won’t see a damn in any monitors ...

    All equipment from tanks to such armored vehicles for transportation of aircraft, and as many as 16 people should have protection and remote sensing (there are installation options for lightly armored vehicles) and KAZ ideally ... Well, from poverty, at least the anti-cumulative grid would be put on they are regular, like the Americans in Iraq, otherwise they will again have to invent something while burying the dead ...
    1. would
      would 11 February 2018 18: 12
      0
      But it’s worth noting that without breaking through the armor, in order to burn the equipment you need the cumulative stream to fall into something that detonates. It rolls with tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, they are so arranged that it’s hard to get to where there is nothing detonating ... and what will detonate in the MPAP?

      I may be something I don’t know, but there is nothing to detonate in the airborne squad in the absence of an amphibious assault force. And under such conditions, the cumulative stream will simply make a hole, maybe even in a person, but no more.

      Perhaps detonation is possible when it enters an engine or tank, but I won’t say here, I don’t know how diesel fuel behaves when a cumulative jet passes through it and I can definitely say that the engine has a lot of things that burn.
  5. san4es
    san4es 10 February 2018 11: 35
    +2
    Capless multifunctional modular armored vehicle "Typhoon-K" on the KamAZ-63968 chassis
    soldier

    Armored vehicles "Typhoon-K".
    Press show, Naberezhnye Chelny, March 15, 2013
  6. APASUS
    APASUS 10 February 2018 12: 22
    0
    The problem is not that it’s a bad car or a good car, but how much our Defense Ministry is able to purchase such equipment, provide advanced parts according to the staffing table. In the meantime, these are only units and only for special operations.
  7. trahterist
    trahterist 10 February 2018 12: 47
    0
    Probably the most beautiful and harmoniously 'folded' armored car.
  8. Alexander S.
    Alexander S. 10 February 2018 13: 35
    0
    Good or bad technique is determined only in battle. Everything else to cheer up. So far, this is just just a technique for the nth amount of money.
    1. Chernobrov's eyebrows
      Chernobrov's eyebrows 10 February 2018 21: 01
      0
      https://youtu.be/OYXnn_uHxoQ
  9. Grigory_45
    Grigory_45 10 February 2018 20: 27
    0
    During the military exercises in the territory of the Khabarovsk Territory, the Typhoon armored vehicle was deployed. With its help, cover was carried out for a special forces detachment that entered into battle with conditional terrorists.

    what is the purpose of this reservation? Transport, BMP? Or something else (what MRAP is understandable) Is her tactical niche? Deliver fighters to a point or go along with them into battle? If the armored personnel carrier is very expensive. If the BMP is "toothless".
  10. Grigory_45
    Grigory_45 10 February 2018 20: 40
    0
    Something about the "Typhoon-U" (based on the "Urals") do not remember. In my opinion, a more promising car
  11. antiamerikan
    antiamerikan 11 February 2018 02: 55
    0
    and where were these funderflakes when the partners sprayed 200 musicians on the east bank?
    1. ProkletyiPirat
      ProkletyiPirat 11 February 2018 03: 59
      0
      Are you talking about what specific case are you talking about?