Military Review

Russian ambassador commented on US new nuclear doctrine

38
The Russian ambassador to the United States of America, Anatoly Antonov, commented on the new US nuclear doctrine. We are talking about the doctrine, which, according to the established American tradition, consists of two parts - open and secret. In the open part, it is stated that Russia “is violating its arms control obligations”. This is announced by the state, which has not yet destroyed (and does not seem to be going) its own arsenal, for example, chemical weapons.


RIA News cites the statement of Anatoly Antonov:
The document mentions the treaty on short and medium range missiles. We are talking on this topic with the United States. I will tell you frankly how a professional, the main thing is to conduct this conversation at the professional level. I am opposed to discussing all these issues through the media. And on this side and on the other hand, there are excellent specialists who are firmly convinced that they can sit together (...) and resolve these problems.


A Russian diplomat, who, incidentally, is under US sanctions since his work at the Russian Defense Ministry, noted that Russia is implementing all arms treaties that it had previously signed on arms control.

Antonov noted that he was extremely surprised by the statements of the United States that Russia allegedly rejected proposals by the United States to further reduce strategic offensive arms.

Russian ambassador commented on US new nuclear doctrine


Anatoly Antonov:
And by February 5, both countries should make statements on how strategic arms reduction treaties are being implemented.


From the statement of the Ambassador of the Russian Federation in Washington:
When we concluded a strategic offensive arms treaty, we repeatedly said that there were official statements by the Russian Federation that we only sign this treaty at the level of anti-ballistic missile defense that existed at the date of signing. Let's see what the statements will be. Capitals will make the appropriate decisions. Will wait.
Photos used:
https://www.facebook.com/RusEmbUSA
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 3 February 2018 06: 17
    0
    They would have sat down and agreed and did not instill fear on the planet’s population because of a nuclear war, endless mutual bickering will not lead to anything good.
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 3 February 2018 06: 54
      16
      Try to negotiate with a card sharpie so that he does not deceive you, and play fair!
      1. ul_vitalii
        ul_vitalii 3 February 2018 07: 06
        +6
        So, we will once again begin to adjust our nuclear doctrine, thereby showing what will be in response.
      2. Spartanez300
        Spartanez300 3 February 2018 08: 55
        0
        Do not you think that the threat of nuclear war and a card game are somewhat different things, the irony here is not appropriate.
    2. vlad66
      vlad66 3 February 2018 08: 35
      +8
      Quote: Spartanez300
      That would have sat down and agreed

      A colleague has long had to agree, but:
      1. On what terms. On the terms of surrender? It was already, you know the result, the collapse of the country and other delights.
      2 On the terms of the winner. It is very desirable and hotstsa, but so far they have not won. request
      3 Well, in order to negotiate, you need to offer trump cards more than this sharpie.
      1. Spartanez300
        Spartanez300 3 February 2018 08: 46
        0
        There are a huge number of trump cards in both countries in the form of nuclear missiles, and it is necessary to agree on mutually beneficial conditions, as it sounds paradoxical. Of course, it is not worth discussing the surrender, and not who will not have passed, but winners if that does not happen. This is me in the reverse order.
  2. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 3 February 2018 06: 22
    13
    It is useless to negotiate with the USA .. Deceive! In 80 = 90 x we ​​tried, we see the results
    1. Alex-a832
      Alex-a832 3 February 2018 06: 37
      +4
      I think that it is possible and necessary to agree, unless the backstage rulers of the United States have decided to unleash TMV. The more loaded rifles in a house hung on the walls, the greater the likelihood that one of them will fire and provoke a global slaughter. 80-90 were bad not by agreements with amers, but by the betrayal of our ruling elites for the sake of their selfish interests.
      1. aKtoR
        aKtoR 3 February 2018 07: 23
        +1
        Sorry, accepted. Only Trump is somewhat confusing and confusing plans ..
        1. Lelek
          Lelek 3 February 2018 11: 27
          +2
          Quote: aKtoR
          Only Trump is a little confusing and confusing plans.

          hi
          Trump himself in this process does not mean much, plays the role of a "talking mouth", and the leadership is concentrated in the hands of the military-industrial complex and money-makers who are interested in increasing military orders, which means pumping government money into their pockets. By the way, regarding Trump himself the other day, a statement was published about a conspiracy inside the FBI and the Justice Ministry to prevent him from participating in the presidential election. Such a scandal in the most democratic and "exceptional".
      2. Same lech
        Same lech 3 February 2018 07: 30
        +2
        I think that it is possible and necessary to agree, unless the backstage rulers of the United States have decided to unleash TMV.

        At one time, Gorbachev was promised not to push the borders of NATO towards RUSSIA ... where is NATO now?

        At our borders ... again you want to be in the role of a sucker. what
        1. Alex-a832
          Alex-a832 3 February 2018 08: 17
          +3
          Gorbachev saved his skin and such promises were in his hands, so he "believed" in them. Gorbachev betrayed the Union, so all of his promises about faith in the West are pure profanity.
    2. tol100v
      tol100v 3 February 2018 07: 06
      +2
      Quote: MIKHAN
      It is useless to negotiate with the USA.

      There is nothing to talk about with the country of liars and hypocrites! They understand only power.
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 3 February 2018 07: 13
        +2
        Quote: Tol100v
        Quote: MIKHAN
        It is useless to negotiate with the USA.

        There is nothing to talk about with the country of liars and hypocrites! They understand only power.

        North Korea is an example .. When Russia rearm the Army and Navy, then you can talk heart to heart!
  3. viktor.
    viktor. 3 February 2018 06: 29
    +2
    I know one thing about the United States, Turkey, the Germans, BELIEVE YOURSELF DO NOT RESPECT! You need to speak with them not in a diplomatic language, but in Russian !!! Otherwise they lose fear, kindness is taken for weakness !! The deceased Vitaly Churkin told them everything in an understandable language and did not worry !!!
    1. Esoteric
      Esoteric 3 February 2018 09: 31
      +1
      Quote: viktor.
      I know one thing about the United States, Turkey, the Germans, BELIEVE YOURSELF DO NOT RESPECT!

      I know Russians whose words also differ from deeds. The truth of the “Russian” in them is as much as the German in Adolf Aloisovich ...
    2. Lelek
      Lelek 3 February 2018 11: 33
      0
      Quote: viktor.
      I know one thing about the United States, Turkey, the Germans, BELIEVE YOURSELF DO NOT RESPECT!

      hi
      It's right. For them, "scammers" in relation to their allies and "their son of a bitch" ordinary practice - just a benefit at a certain stage and - into the trash after use.
  4. aszzz888
    aszzz888 3 February 2018 06: 29
    +2
    And on this and on the other hand there are excellent specialists, I am firmly convinced - who can sit together (...) and resolve these problems.

    Not those goals are set by the Merikatos audience to discuss at the negotiating table .. It’s easier to tweet, through their garbage-media, at any speeches before graduates who do not know geography ... angry
  5. Graz
    Graz 3 February 2018 06: 37
    +5
    no reductions in nuclear weapons, they have much more conventional weapons.

    The United States should be officially declared that when attacking Russian territory through the territory of the United States a comprehensive nuclear strike will be delivered for complete destruction, this should be announced by the Supreme Commander, this should be an official position and it should be communicated to the Yankees everywhere and always
    1. Esoteric
      Esoteric 3 February 2018 09: 33
      0
      Quote: Graz
      and she must reach the Yankees everywhere and always

      DAILY!!! am
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 3 February 2018 06: 38
    +7
    I am opposed to discussing all these issues through the media
    The trouble is that it is beneficial for the Americans to exaggerate this issue in the media. Every day the situation is becoming more and more intense. A poor American and European layman is forcibly hammered into the head who is a “threat” to the world. Thus, they are trying to somehow hide their non-fulfillment of contracts and aggressiveness, which is already rushing like a sour pot from a tank. It is useless to negotiate with these, as they do not fulfill their obligations and are not going to fulfill building the world for themselves.
    1. Alex-a832
      Alex-a832 3 February 2018 08: 12
      +2
      It depends on what is called an arrangement. If, as in that joke about the game with cheaters, then negotiating is both stupid and harmful. And if the exchange of weighty arguments, up to ultimatums, then this is a way to keep the world from being dumped in TMV. Honesty and conscience of opponents does not matter, the main thing is pragmatism, and there is more than enough of it among amers.
      1. Esoteric
        Esoteric 3 February 2018 09: 35
        0
        Quote: Alex-a832
        Honesty and conscience of opponents does not matter

        The restored (newly created) Russian military in Cuba will be of importance ... request
    2. zhekazs
      zhekazs 3 February 2018 10: 05
      0
      So amertz acts like that in everything. They are being pumped into the media for any reason. But we have sound heads that can read between the lines and their word is significant. I believe that we have nowhere else to reduce strategic offensive arms, but there is enough available, we need to constantly modernize and improve our potential, which, in fact, is happening now, unlike ...
      The opportunity to agree on a reduction of nuclear strategic offensive arms will be when the aforementioned “weapons based on new physical principles” appears.
  7. Herculesic
    Herculesic 3 February 2018 06: 53
    +1
    Was his ambassador taken from kindergarten? It carries such nonsense! You can not believe the United States, and you need to remember the main thing that for America, the dismemberment or even complete destruction of Russia is one of their most lousy tasks! It did not work to create a completely controlled by them liberal government in our country — they will act against us by force, and they will strike immediately in several places at the same time.
    1. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii 3 February 2018 07: 12
      +6
      They expect more information from him, maybe he will say something superfluous, but he goes to their ears, Emelya is your week. Diplomat.
      1. Herculesic
        Herculesic 3 February 2018 07: 29
        +1
        So it turns out, and our only rides through the gorges! negative Out of place man! am
    2. Esoteric
      Esoteric 3 February 2018 09: 37
      0
      Quote: Herkulesich
      It carries such nonsense!

      And he will carry on until he is "forced to answer for the bazaar" ...
  8. Observer2014
    Observer2014 3 February 2018 07: 17
    +3
    What is there to comment on? Russia's nuclear doctrine should sound short and clear to everyone.
    As soon as possible. : So much for the nuclear doctrine of Russia. repeat laughing
    1. Esoteric
      Esoteric 3 February 2018 09: 40
      +1
      Quote: Observer2014
      What is there to comment on? Russia's nuclear doctrine should sound short and clear to everyone.
      As soon as possible.

      And if shorter: "Russia's nuclear doctrine should sound". To begin with, this nuclear doctrine must somewhere “voice” at least a couple of notes ... repeat
  9. Simon
    Simon 3 February 2018 07: 32
    +1
    Quote: Spartanez300
    They would have sat down and agreed and did not instill fear on the planet’s population because of a nuclear war, endless mutual bickering will not lead to anything good.

    It is useless to negotiate with the Americans. If yes, and in some case they agree, then they are sure to look for obstacles in order to slow them down or not to fulfill them at all. The USA is a state of war, since it lives on this. request
    1. Esoteric
      Esoteric 3 February 2018 09: 43
      0
      Quote: Simon
      The USA is a state of war, since it lives on this.

      It was created for this, far from all possible conflicts surrounded by oceans and "complaisant" (pacified) neighbors ... How pleasant it is to be safe, feeding both sides of the conflict, which was unleashed not without the help of striped ...
  10. Simon
    Simon 3 February 2018 07: 46
    +2
    Quote: Graz
    no reductions in nuclear weapons, they have much more conventional weapons.

    The United States should be officially declared that when attacking Russian territory through the territory of the United States a comprehensive nuclear strike will be delivered for complete destruction, this should be announced by the Supreme Commander, this should be an official position and it should be communicated to the Yankees everywhere and always

    I agree with you! But! What such a blow would be dealt if, in the event of hostilities with North Korea, American missiles fall into Russian territory and even radiation. It would not be bad for China to say the same. We are two countries that are interested in this, as we border North Korea. I think that the ardor of the Americans, in starting a war, in this case will diminish! negative
    1. Esoteric
      Esoteric 3 February 2018 09: 49
      0
      Quote: Simon
      It would not be bad for China to say the same. We are two countries that are interested in this.

      You treat China as a companion in a compartment carriage of a long-distance train. You can talk with him, you can have a bite together in a restaurant car. It is possible that each of you will pay for the dinner of another from your pocket ... But, as soon as you reach the destination station, your paths will diverge, and after a while you will not even remember his name ...
      We need to live in such a way that everyone can show that our independence is independent, our sovereignty is unshakable, our defense ability is at its best, and decisions are made only when they are beneficial to us ...
  11. bald
    bald 3 February 2018 09: 16
    +1
    When there is a desire to adequately negotiate, this is one thing, and with shit to have some kind of agreement !!! - Let them hurt Bosko.
  12. Terenin
    Terenin 3 February 2018 09: 45
    +5
    Antonov noted that he was extremely surprised by US statements The information tactics of the Americans are clear-deny-disagree-blame, and Antonov is still surprised request
  13. Dormidont
    Dormidont 3 February 2018 09: 52
    0
    And only diplomatic etiquette and unspoken censorship did not allow the Americans to be called what they really are
  14. Old26
    Old26 3 February 2018 10: 40
    0
    Quote: Alex-a832
    I think that it is possible and necessary to agree, unless the backstage rulers of the United States have decided to unleash TMV.

    How to untie? Now the program for extending the life cycle of nuclear weapons is almost in the middle. They "modernized" one type, the rest by the mid-20s. New warheads of the IW type to replace the W-xx will go into production no earlier than 2030. The reduction is under the START-3 treaty. They are not so dou raki to start a war with Russia in such unfavorable conditions for themselves. The maximum that can be assumed is the conflict on the Korean Peninsula

    Quote: Graz
    no reductions in nuclear weapons, they have much more conventional weapons.

    So you are against what the Supreme is doing now? Initiate his impeachment, motivating this by betraying the interests of Russia

    Quote: Graz
    The United States should be officially declared that when attacking Russian territory through the territory of the United States a comprehensive nuclear strike will be delivered for complete destruction, this should be announced by the Supreme Commander, this should be an official position and it should be communicated to the Yankees everywhere and always


    And about officially announced ... You probably dear the last 10-15 years were in a lethargic dream??? Not? Probably still in a dream, otherwise they would have known the main provisions of our Military Doctrine. And so it turns out you are trying to talk about it as something that you must do without knowing that it has been done for a decade and a half.

    Quote: Simon
    I agree with you! But! What such a blow would be dealt if, in the event of hostilities with North Korea, American missiles fall into Russian territory and even radiation. It would not be bad for China to say the same. We are two countries that are interested in this, as we border North Korea. I think that the ardor of the Americans, in starting a war, in this case will diminish!

    And can you find out how American missiles get into Russia during the attack of North Korea? What about radiation? But this is completely frivolous. Soviet radiation from Chernobyl fell to Western Europe, and this was not a reason to deliver a nuclear strike in response. so here. They, like ours, no longer have dirty bombs, and striking at North Korean nuclear facilities is so far away from Russian territory.
    About the PRC. Do not forget what the Chinese Foreign Minister said about the situation around North Korea. And he said
    1. If the Americans start first, China will help Korea.
    2. If North Korea starts first, let it rely solely on itself.

    But actually an interesting document
    In particular, for the first time in an American document, STATUS-6 appeared on the fleet and the experimental (?) Complex SS-19 mod, X-4 in the Strategic Missile Forces and X-32 in the Air Force.

    And the deadlines for modernizing the American nuclear potential are officially given. Before that, they were only in the report of their Ministry of Energy - now they are included in the doctrine
    • Completing the W76-1 LEP by Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 / completion of the LEP program for warheads W-76-1 - fiscal year 2019
    • Completing the B61-12 LEP by FY2024 / completion of the LEP program for B61-12 bombs - fiscal year 2024
    • Completing the W88 alterations by FY2024 / completion of the LEP program for W88 warheads - fiscal year 2024
    • Synchronizing NNSA's W80-4 life extension, with DoD's LRSO program and completing the W80-4 LEP by FY2031; - the program for these warheads is planned to be completed already in fiscal year 2031
    • Advancing the W78 warhead replacement one year to FY19 to support fielding on GBSD by 2030 and investigate the feasibility of fielding the nuclear explosive package in a Navy flight vehicle / program extended until 2030