Military Review

A batch of T-90C tanks sent to Iraq

34
A video of the loading in the port of Ust-Luga (Leningrad Region) onto a Russian vessel appeared on the Web tanks T-90S, reports bmpd.


A batch of T-90C tanks sent to Iraq


Judging by the color, this armored vehicle is intended to be sent to Iraq.

The resource recalls that in the annual report of JSC NPK Uralvagonzavod for 2016, the priority tasks for 2017 year featured the beginning of the implementation of the contract with the customer 368 (Iraq) for the supply of the first batch in the amount of 73 of T-90С / СК.



In November last year, the press service of the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation (FSMTC) reported that "the contract is being implemented in accordance with the schedule approved by the parties."
Photos used:
wikipedia.org
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 2 February 2018 12: 57 New
    +7
    It would be better if the plant's priority tasks were to supply a large batch of T-90M to the Russian army ..... well, Iraq pays in foreign currency .....
    1. siberalt
      siberalt 2 February 2018 13: 02 New
      +1
      From Iraq, too, the Turks will have to be beaten out.
      1. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 2 February 2018 13: 07 New
        18
        Quote: Alexey-74
        It would be better if the plant's priority tasks were to supply a large batch of T-90M Russian army ...
        - Or maybe we’ll just switch everything on ourselves? Figs with him, with business! But somehow patriotic!
    2. vlad66
      vlad66 2 February 2018 13: 16 New
      15
      Quote: Alexey-74
      there was a supply of a large batch of T-90M Russian army ..

      So you yourself gave an answer
      Quote: Alexey-74
      Iraq pays in foreign currency .....

      To release a large batch of T-90M Russian army. hi
    3. seti
      seti 2 February 2018 13: 22 New
      +4
      If only for myself to do this means giving customers to staff members and others. And what UVZ do not need foreign orders? No, it's better we load our plants with orders. We have something to upgrade including the T-90А to the T-90AM.
      Small batches of T-90 from the assembly line and now go to the troops, but this is a necessary measure. T-14 is preferred over optional T-90.
    4. raw174
      raw174 2 February 2018 13: 47 New
      +8
      Quote: Alexey-74
      It would be better if the plant's priority tasks were to supply a large batch of T-90M to the Russian army ..... well, Iraq pays in foreign currency .....

      It’s like a farmer, the calf’s meat will only be eaten by itself ... Weapons are simply goods, the enterprise earns, people receive salaries, everything is fine.
    5. Ryazan87
      Ryazan87 2 February 2018 15: 20 New
      +1
      The Russian Army "deeply modernized" T-72s come with a shutter of the sight, mounted on bolts. Ehhhh ...
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 2 February 2018 12: 58 New
    +4
    There is a contract - it is necessary to fulfill, and our people are guaranteed a job and a salary.
  3. ul_vitalii
    ul_vitalii 2 February 2018 12: 58 New
    +7
    Serious party, success in operation.
  4. Angel_and_Demon
    Angel_and_Demon 2 February 2018 12: 58 New
    +9
    This armored vehicle is intended for shipment to Iraq.
    did Iraq throw mattresses with their abrams?
    1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
      Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 2 February 2018 13: 04 New
      11
      Of the 140 available in the army of Iraq at the beginning of the 2014 of the year, the M1A1M Abrams tanks, about a third were out of order. Confirmed irretrievable loss in the battles against ISIS 22 machines of this type. The total number in 48 of failed tanks is also made up of vehicles lost for non-combat reasons. Abrams turned out to be too complicated equipment for the Iraqi army, which leads to its replacement with a more simple and reliable T-90.
      1. Angel_and_Demon
        Angel_and_Demon 2 February 2018 13: 10 New
        +5
        Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
        which leads to its replacement by a more simple and reliable T-90.

        But what about the sanctions?
        1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
          Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 2 February 2018 13: 13 New
          +8
          The topic of sanctions in relations with Iraq is absent. In addition, Iraqi pilots on the Mi-35, 28н and SU-25 successfully fight. Why not buy armored vehicles?
          1. Angel_and_Demon
            Angel_and_Demon 2 February 2018 13: 16 New
            +4
            and in the light of recent events - cooperation with the Russian military-industrial complex - is subject to sanctions
            1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
              Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 2 February 2018 13: 34 New
              +3
              Iraq bought airplanes from us when the United States postponed the transfer of the ordered 2014 F-36IQ (C Block 16) indefinitely in 52. Iraq now has problems servicing Abrams tanks. The main reason for the U-turn from the USA to the Russian Federation is the cost and time of deliveries. A warring country cannot wait for weapons for years.
              1. Angel_and_Demon
                Angel_and_Demon 2 February 2018 13: 38 New
                +4
                Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
                A warring country cannot wait for a weapon for a year and a half.

                So the owners allowed?
                1. andj61
                  andj61 2 February 2018 14: 47 New
                  +8
                  Quote: Angel_and_Demon
                  Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
                  A warring country cannot wait for a weapon for a year and a half.

                  So the owners allowed?

                  And who is Iraq’s master? They work very closely with the Americans, but even more closely with Iran: Shiites are in power in Iraq. So, apparently, you are right: Iran does not object to the supply of Russian tanks to Iraq. bully hi
                  1. kapitan92
                    kapitan92 2 February 2018 23: 18 New
                    +2
                    Quote: andj61
                    So, apparently, you are right: Iran does not object to the supply of Russian tanks to Iraq.

                    In this case, logistics is interesting. From Nizhny Tagil to Ust-Luga, then around Europe via Suez and a couple of straits. Not easier through the Caspian and Iran? hi
    2. Kasym
      Kasym 2 February 2018 20: 51 New
      +1
      The US recently denied Iraq Abrams service. hi
  5. tochila
    tochila 2 February 2018 13: 01 New
    +3
    Good news! Good luck UVZ and Nizhny Tagil !!! Tagil rules !!!
    1. AVGUST
      AVGUST 2 February 2018 13: 36 New
      +3
      Yes, we not only steer, we also steal ALL, because the Urals are the supporting edge of the state.
  6. Horst78
    Horst78 2 February 2018 13: 06 New
    +2
    Quote: Angel_and_Demon
    This armored vehicle is intended for shipment to Iraq.
    did Iraq throw mattresses with their abrams?

    Mattresses thrown Iraq to service abramsikov
  7. viktor.
    viktor. 2 February 2018 13: 31 New
    0
    Maybe soon to Iran ???
    1. raw174
      raw174 2 February 2018 14: 48 New
      +2
      Quote: viktor.
      Maybe soon to Iran ???

      Do you think the author of an article from the State Department ???
  8. raw174
    raw174 2 February 2018 13: 49 New
    +2
    Over time, we will see over time who is really cooler on the battlefield, Abrams, T-90 or some Leopard ...
  9. Vladivostok1969
    Vladivostok1969 2 February 2018 14: 49 New
    0
    Maybe you don’t have to argue building tanks for yourself or for sale. And expand production at UVZ. Or to open a new plant somewhere on the basis of a repair plant. Such was earlier (10 years ago) in Ussuriysk. And then we will all be happy.
    1. Wolka
      Wolka 2 February 2018 15: 31 New
      +1
      and still Omsk has not been canceled ...
      1. Vladivostok1969
        Vladivostok1969 2 February 2018 15: 35 New
        0
        I do not mind. Omsk is a great place for the production of T-90M.
        Hi fellow. I was born in Petropavlovsk Kaz. hi
  10. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 2 February 2018 15: 15 New
    0
    Through Novorossiysk to Iraq would not be closer? what
  11. Wolka
    Wolka 2 February 2018 15: 28 New
    0
    I hope the shipment is not on credit ...
  12. lance
    lance 2 February 2018 15: 44 New
    +2
    and I have joy in my soul. let them sail to Iraq, etc., because the main production at the moment. if the Russian Federation is able to issue them per month in pieces of 40, this is a warning to the potential aggressor, in combat conditions per month, 160 pieces. I recall 3 years ago how I fought with the members of the forum that the T-90 is better than the abrams and the leopard, where is there, after all, the Russian Federation with Serdyukov was munching our tanks like a rascal.
  13. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 2 February 2018 17: 26 New
    +1
    Judging by the color, this armored vehicle is intended to be sent to Iraq.

    Or maybe all the same to Syria .. A tank fist would not hinder there on the Israeli border!
  14. Lesorub
    Lesorub 2 February 2018 17: 26 New
    +1
    If the T-90S really goes to Iraq, then in the near future they will be tested in combat! (apparently the Iraqis have something wrong with the Abramas)))
  15. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 2 February 2018 23: 06 New
    0
    We would still get rid of the 70k heap laughing