Military Review

Survey in Georgia: What is the percentage of citizens for joining NATO?

57
Georgian Foreign Minister Mikhail Janelidze met with the NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. The main topic of discussion is the integration of Georgia into the North Atlantic military bloc.


The press service of the Georgian Foreign Ministry notes that Stoltenberg positively assessed the work that was done in Tbilisi for "the best compliance with the requirements of NATO." In particular, Georgia’s ANP (Annual National Program) program was noted. This is a national program in cooperation with the North Atlantic military bloc.

Janelidze and Stoltenberg discussed the issues of the “territorial integrity of Georgia”. The speech once again turned on the status of the Republic of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, the independence of which Georgia does not recognize, and without such recognition NATO (on the basis of the charter) cannot take Georgia into its “fraternal” composition.

Jens Stoltenberg made a very vague remark that NATO will continue to assist the Georgian partners in the process of strengthening the country's security.

Stoltenberg:
It was also stated at the forum in Warsaw that Georgia possesses practically all the main tools for joining NATO.


Survey in Georgia: What is the percentage of citizens for joining NATO?


Against this background, a survey was conducted in Georgia on the subject of civil support for the idea of ​​the country's entry into the Western military bloc. 20% of respondents opposed joining NATO, 41% supported. The rest did not dare to provide a definite answer. At the same time, 19% of citizens were in favor of joining the Eurasian Economic Union, and 45% were in favor of integration with the EU. The survey was conducted on a grant from the American Carnegie Center.
Photos used:
http://www.mfa.gov.ge
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. _Jack_
    _Jack_ 1 February 2018 15: 18
    +9
    What is the percentage of citizens for a country joining NATO?
    and who would ask them, could they join, would have been there for a long time, but they have unresolved territorial problems, they don’t take such ones (so far)
    1. RASKAT
      RASKAT 1 February 2018 15: 22
      +5
      Georgia has an unfinished border conflict, with such a NATO does not take. Although if the country is on the border with Russia, they will make an exception.
      1. Svarog
        Svarog 1 February 2018 15: 29
        14
        This is also an indicator of the success of foreign policy, many members of the forum agree that everything is bad in the economy and in this part they put a second opinion on the government, but in terms of foreign policy there is a solid nickel ... Personally, I do not see much success in foreign policy , Georgia, Ukraine - this is generally a priority and if they worked with these countries, then there would be no enemies at our borders now. And the saddest thing is that ordinary citizens of the former post-Soviet countries are increasingly negative about Russia. I understand that propaganda works there. But where were we?
        1. _Jack_
          _Jack_ 1 February 2018 15: 37
          11
          On the one hand, everything is true, our intelligence nifig did nothing there all these years when the Americans actively worked there and invested decent money in promoting Russophobia and organizing revolutions. On the other hand, remember when it was necessary to do this - the 90s, we had no time for Ukraine and Georgia, then the Americans themselves ruled openly in our country, and then it was too late, I had to react as I was (Abkhazia, Ossetia, DNR, LC), otherwise it would have been even worse, it would have been good though, otherwise the US Navy base would have been in Sevastopol now.
          1. Stas157
            Stas157 1 February 2018 16: 51
            +5
            The survey was funded by a grant from the Carnegie American Center.

            If the survey was conducted by the Russian VTsIOM, the alignment would be completely different.
            1. Svarog
              Svarog 1 February 2018 17: 14
              +4
              Quote: Stas157
              The survey was funded by a grant from the Carnegie American Center.

              If the survey was conducted by the Russian VTsIOM, the alignment would be completely different.

              Perhaps I won’t argue because I don’t know .. regarding Georgia. But in Ukraine, there the mood of citizens coincides with the polls.
              1. dik-nsk
                dik-nsk 2 February 2018 07: 26
                0
                20% of citizens surveyed opposed joining NATO, 41% - for
                incorrectly posed question, it was necessary "Are you for joining NATO, subject to the recognition of the independence of Abkhazia and Ossetia?" because you need to ask a question according to reality
                Once again, it came to the status of the Republic of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, whose independence Georgia does not recognize, and without such recognition, NATO (based on the charter) cannot take Georgia into its "brotherly" composition
                then look at the result
        2. Vita vko
          Vita vko 1 February 2018 15: 48
          +6
          Quote: Svarog
          if they worked with these countries, then now there would be no enemies at our borders
          In general, you are right, since the United States works; the Russian special services do not work, i.e. do not organize terrorist attacks, do not engage in political killings, do not impose censorship. I doubt that anyone in Russia could agree with such methods of work. It is only the American mentality that can justify all this. Now in politics there are only 4-5 generations of the first American settlers. After all, I understand who tried to hide behind the ocean. The mistake of the Russian political elite is that it expects adequate behavior from the descendants of the moral ur-s.
          1. Svarog
            Svarog 1 February 2018 16: 01
            +4
            Quote: Vita VKO
            The mistake of the Russian political elite is that it expects adequate behavior from the descendants of the moral ur-s.

            Do you think that we have a very naive leadership at the FSB GRU?
            1. Vita vko
              Vita vko 1 February 2018 16: 16
              +1
              Quote: Svarog
              we have a very naive leadership at the GRU FSB

              I don’t think so, but I know for sure. There is enough evidence, and I myself had to intersect. The problem is that psychologically a person measures everything by himself. Gaining people with a pure and warm heart in the GRU and the FSB, the subconscious mind will always be waiting for the same until they receive evidence to the contrary.
              1. Svarog
                Svarog 1 February 2018 16: 20
                +4
                Quote: Vita VKO
                Recruiting people with a pure and warm heart in the GRU and the FSB in the subconscious mind there will always be a similar expectation until they receive evidence to the contrary.

                Are you about these guys with pure and warm hearts?
                https://youtu.be/hOzZROaFk6Y?t=8
                1. Vita vko
                  Vita vko 1 February 2018 16: 59
                  +1
                  Quote: Svarog
                  What about these guys with pure and warm hearts?

                  That's it! During their studies, the guys finally understood where they got, so they decided to quit in such a non-standard way. And then there were sponsors, for such specialists, Geliki as a requisite was provided with subsequent employment. So they staged a play for the naive command of the FSB. What I told you about. Well, think about it, how many tuples are driving around Moscow every day during graduations - thousands! Even DPS is not interesting what kind of motorcade, the main rule is to follow. And here only the transport is lacking "FSB Academy". They would write a name and a personal number on each forehead, but they were afraid of criminal liability for disclosure. lol
          2. Korax71
            Korax71 1 February 2018 23: 27
            0
            Naive laughing and the Soviet Union overthrew its time in inconvenient rulers, and there were enough political killings. the school remained the same. only the name of the country changed.
        3. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 1 February 2018 17: 09
          +6
          Quote: Svarog
          This is also an indicator of the success of foreign policy, many members of the forum agree that everything is bad in the economy and in this part they put a second opinion on the government, but in terms of foreign policy there is a solid nickel ... Personally, I do not see much success in foreign policy , Georgia, Ukraine - this is generally a priority and if you worked with these countries, then there would be no enemies at our borders now. And the saddest thing is that ordinary citizens of the former post-Soviet countries are increasingly negative about Russia. I understand that propaganda works there. But where were we?

          But how do we know that - where were you? Forgot where were you going? So I remind you. After the collapse of the USSR, all republics in orderly rows went to "be friends" with the USA and Europe. Russia led by Yeltsin was led there too. Fortunately, having stumbled along this path during the two Chechen wars, in 2000 Russia realized that nobody was waiting for her there as an equal partner, moreover, they were making every effort to destroy it. If Russia began to gradually pursue its policy, then Georgia and Urkain remained in the zone of unconditional US influence. How do you offer to work with them? Well, you yourself understand that if the first persons of the state are in the US nomenclature, then you at least sprinkle gold on each Georgian with a Ukranian, the result will be zero. Russia did not have the opportunity to pursue any policy there because of its weakness, which cannot be said about the United States. They worked in Syria, so the Americans have been screaming for two years, as if they had pinched their doors with Faberge. So we are in a much better economic, physical and military form than we were in the 90s. In the 90s, it was our main goal to survive and not fall apart.
          1. Svarog
            Svarog 1 February 2018 17: 22
            +4
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            at least sprinkle with gold every Georgian with a Ukraian, the result will be zero.

            You think in the right direction, you had to grow your elite. It was quite simple to do, given the general mentality and great past .. It was just that you had to deal with it. It is clear that somewhere, to someone, it was probably not before .. Well, in the end they got what they got. But how, under the USSR, when the state was only established and was practically impoverished, did we manage to spread our influence? And not only along our borders.
            1. Nyrobsky
              Nyrobsky 1 February 2018 23: 04
              +1
              Quote: Svarog
              It was quite simple to do, given the general mentality and great past ..
              Ahem. You understand, dear, that Georgia, that Urkaina became part of the Russian Empire of their own free will, when need forced to seek protection from the adversary. If this had not happened, then all of Georgia would have been walking 250 years in the Turkish language, and Urkain in Poland. So no, they heard and accepted, and taking them under the wing of Russia gave them the opportunity to preserve both faith and their customs. And their customs (in other words, “common mentality”) consist in avoiding the global lyuli to take a kneeling position before the strong, and then bite the lactating hand and go over to the enemy camp in search of a new master. It was Russia that spawned princes there, and Turkey would have shortened the whole corrupt Georgian nobility by the head. Saved on your own head.
              Quote: Svarog
              It just needed to be dealt with. It is clear that somewhere, to someone, it was probably not before ..

              You see, the theme of the rebound did not arise in 1991, but much earlier. That the Georgians fled and argued for leaving the USSR in 1989, that dill popped in all corners that they fed the entire Soviet Union and voted against the preservation of the USSR. At the same time, both of them being in the USSR consumed more than they produced. In simple terms - "mad with fat." The mentality of the trader is significantly different from the mentality of the creator. They wanted to sell tangerines, lard and vodka not for rubles, but for dollars. At the same time, they didn’t care ... that is, to shove on their state. For them, the entire state is limited by the size of their farm or tangerine garden. Previously, they had territory from Poti or Tbilisi to Vladivostok ........ from Kuev to Sakhalin ..... but now they have from Poti or Kuev to where they will let go, and even if there are sufficient funds for the hotel and departure.
              Quote: Svarog
              But how, under the USSR, when the state was only established and was practically impoverished, did we manage to spread our influence? And not only along our borders.
              An ideology uniting all was revealed. Factories to the workers, land to the peasants who are not with us then to hell with them .... and it was this idea that united all, regardless of national and religious preferences. What can unite people today? Pursuit of the dollar? No. Today there is no ideological magnet that is understandable to millions and billions.
              1. Svarog
                Svarog 1 February 2018 23: 19
                +3
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                An ideology uniting all was revealed. Factories to the workers, land to the peasants who are not with us then to hell with them .... and it was this idea that united all, regardless of national and religious preferences. What can unite people today? Pursuit of the dollar? No. Today there is no ideological magnet that is understandable to millions and billions.

                That's very agree with you. Especially with this part. Anyway, the Georgians are exactly the same as you described, like the Ukrainians, but the Americans managed to buy the elite, they succeeded. And we could do the same thing, although without ideology, of course it’s more difficult. But still it was necessary to work. And they simply did not deal with these states. The GRU, the FSB have enough experience in how such things are done, and if you look at the root, there simply was no political will ..
                1. BecmepH
                  BecmepH 2 February 2018 06: 05
                  0
                  Quote: Svarog
                  the Americans managed to buy the elite, succeeded. And we could do the same

                  And if it was an auction? And their wallet turned out to be thicker?
      2. seti
        seti 1 February 2018 15: 54
        +1
        The IMF also had a rule of loot not to give countries that defaulted and have outstanding debts. But nothing - the country 4o4 gave a handout. And they will give it ... So here - there will be a go-ahead to take anyone to NATO. And to the side what territorial problems are there. But the Baltic states have no problems with the territories? Or the Poles ..? Yes, our relatives have it .. They trumpet it everywhere where they can .. It’s quiet so far .. So far there is one restraining factor - who knows how the Kremlin can react and what it will do .. But here the example of Crimea before our eyes is already needed . They have something to lose, and we are familiar .. And to fight the NATO leadership alone with the Russian Federation .. The USA is overwhelming and doing its thing .. Most EU countries believe I’m just going to freeze .. Georgians? Not I'm not that I'm waiting for the tram.
    2. Andrey K
      Andrey K 1 February 2018 15: 24
      +7
      ... Poll in Georgia: What percentage of citizens for a country joining NATO? ...

      It sounds as if they are asking - what percentage of citizens is ready to plunge into the next get along.
      08.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX is probably not a science.
      Before this provocation in Georgia, there were also polls, arms deliveries, and the training of local "dogs of war".
      What all of us witnessed.
    3. Vita vko
      Vita vko 1 February 2018 15: 27
      0
      Quote: _Jack_
      who will ask them?

      You can ask in different ways. Since the survey is conducted by the master of psychological manipulations of the Carnegie Center and the Soros Foundations, such polls are not worth a penny. Their only goal is political manipulation with the aim of fueling a conflict near the borders with Russia. This is even simpler than with a Powell test tube, now there are enough simple cakes according to the Nuland recipe, you can even not fresh and without meat.
    4. Art
      Art 1 February 2018 15: 27
      +1
      "Polls" of citizens do not show real statistics. "Polls" shows the wishes of the "elite" of the country. Therefore, according to surveys, one can indirectly judge the hidden desires of "elites"
      1. Svarog
        Svarog 1 February 2018 15: 37
        +4
        Quote: Kunst
        "Polls" of citizens do not show real statistics. "Polls" shows the wishes of the "elite" of the country. Therefore, according to surveys, one can indirectly judge the hidden desires of "elites"

        Is this also applicable to Russia?
    5. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 1 February 2018 17: 16
      0
      Quote: _Jack_
      What is the percentage of citizens for a country joining NATO?
      and who would ask them, could they join, would have been there for a long time, but they have unresolved territorial problems, they don’t take such ones (so far)

      The United States is a country that can easily step over the rules of joining NATO. Now she is preparing Georgia for entry. And when the time comes "Ch", it will be immediately accepted, regardless of any territorial problems. The main thing is that Georgia is ready for this. I mean the fit of the Georgian army to NATO standards. The task of the Russian Foreign Ministry is to prevent the onset of this "time" Ch ""
    6. vlad66
      vlad66 1 February 2018 18: 38
      +6
      Quote: _Jack_
      such in nature do not take (for now)

      But if you need to spoil Russia, they will take it right away. yes
  2. Non liberoid Russian
    Non liberoid Russian 1 February 2018 15: 22
    +2
    what kind of warriors did they show on 08.08.08/2/XNUMX ... and will they overpower XNUMX% of the GDP in the military budget or how much trump does it require?
    1. sgazeev
      sgazeev 1 February 2018 15: 28
      0
      Quote: Not a liberoid Russian
      what kind of warriors did they show on 08.08.08/2/XNUMX ... and will they overpower XNUMX% of the GDP in the military budget or how much trump does it require?

      They will master, will purse man purses in the European Assault. lol
    2. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii 1 February 2018 15: 31
      +9
      No matter what the fighters are, our forces will be pulled over themselves, and the NATO base will be immediately deployed. Iran is next to it.
    3. Partyzan
      Partyzan 1 February 2018 15: 34
      +2
      Quote: Not Liberoid Russian
      and whether they will overpower 2% of GDP in the military budget

      for the sake of annoying Russia, they will make an exception
    4. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 1 February 2018 17: 20
      0
      Quote: Not a liberoid Russian
      what kind of warriors did they show on 08.08.08/2/XNUMX ... and will they overpower XNUMX% of the GDP in the military budget or how much trump does it require?

      The dog is not afraid of the bear, but it makes it so difficult to concentrate on the hunter.
  3. Herculesic
    Herculesic 1 February 2018 15: 27
    +1
    In vain we did not release Tbilisi in 2008! am
    1. Non liberoid Russian
      Non liberoid Russian 1 February 2018 15: 33
      0
      from whom ? from the "rodents"?
    2. tezey
      tezey 1 February 2018 15: 35
      0
      Suppose released. What would happen next. Georgians would love to kiss our fighters. No matter how.
    3. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii 1 February 2018 15: 45
      +6
      Quote: Herkulesich
      In vain we did not release Tbilisi in 2008! am

      And so they accused of disproportionate use of force.
    4. ando_bor
      ando_bor 1 February 2018 16: 13
      +1
      Quote: Herkulesich
      In vain we did not release Tbilisi in 2008!

      Well, the Georgians would be fed, but do we need it? - look at their level of GDP per capita, - poverty is insufferable.
      1. Stas157
        Stas157 1 February 2018 16: 58
        +3
        Quote: ando_bor
        Well, the Georgians would be fed, but do we need it?

        Who obliges you to engage in feeding? I constantly hear this nonsense. US Libya fed? Maybe Yugoslavia? Iraq? The enemy is defeated not in order to feed him, but just the opposite.
    5. Stas157
      Stas157 1 February 2018 16: 53
      +3
      Quote: Herkulesich
      In vain we did not release Tbilisi in 2008! am

      Sarkozy asked not to do this.
  4. mavrus
    mavrus 1 February 2018 15: 39
    0
    Quote: RASKAT
    Georgia has an unfinished border conflict, with such a NATO does not take. Although if the country is on the border with Russia, they will make an exception.

    If the Phachington regional committee wants it, then they will take it ... We constantly see on the example of Ukraine, if the Americans need to spoil Russia, then everything else, all these rules, charters and other rubbish, are on the sidelines.
  5. tezey
    tezey 1 February 2018 15: 53
    +4
    Georgian elites from the very beginning, after the collapse of the USSR, were guided by the USA and Europe. Like almost all post-Soviet countries, the ideology of a new capitalist Georgia was nationalism, Russophobia and anti-communism. Not in the same form as in the Baltic states or today's Ukraine, but all this took place. For the people of Georgia, the country's accession to NATO does not matter, it matters to the Georgian elite. They see NATO membership as a guarantee of the safety of their power and their capital. Why NATO, not Russia. And it's that simple. It matters both the factor of economic power and the ideological factor. All 26 years of their independence, Georgians have taught that Russia is an exploiting country, a colonizing country, and the west is white and fluffy, rich and democratic. Could Russia oppose its vision of the situation and outbid the Georgian elites. Perhaps it could, but whether it was necessary for our capitalists. Today we see no need. Therefore, Russia and Georgia will move further apart.
    1. Svarog
      Svarog 1 February 2018 23: 22
      +3
      Quote: Theseus
      Therefore, Russia and Georgia will move further apart.

      Very clearly and reasonably, if only all such comments were written. Plus))
  6. Laksamana besar
    Laksamana besar 1 February 2018 16: 08
    +1
    "How does Georgia participate in NATO? - How do eggs during sexual intercourse: participate, but do not enter."
  7. bald
    bald 1 February 2018 16: 14
    0
    There was a chance, during the war in Abkhazia, to take Georgia under control - as an aggressor, as always, we step on the rake and get in the face.
  8. Dormidont
    Dormidont 1 February 2018 16: 38
    +2
    It’s ridiculous to read discussions about the conditions for joining this kagal. One condition - you need a bridgehead and meat against Russia - even penguins and arthropods will accept
  9. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 1 February 2018 17: 09
    0
    But they can take Russia in spite, but then Georgians don’t be offended by us ..
  10. Million
    Million 1 February 2018 17: 10
    0
    Nonsense. It doesn’t matter what the citizens of Georgia want, it’s important how they count. You don’t have to go far for examples
  11. aleks.29ru
    aleks.29ru 1 February 2018 18: 44
    0
    Former fellow citizens with those who pay. Do you agree to contain them? No? "Then we go to Natu."
  12. CAT BAIYUN
    CAT BAIYUN 1 February 2018 19: 10
    0
    The issue of joining NATO does not shine by definition: there are territorial claims.
    And the survey .. Yes, in jo ... well, shove this survey deeper.
  13. APASUS
    APASUS 1 February 2018 19: 15
    0
    All NATO needs from Georgia is to sign a “military Schengen” type agreement. Georgia will not get into NATO, but it will hope that the occupying forces will help it!
  14. Belarus is Russia
    Belarus is Russia 1 February 2018 22: 12
    0
    Fuck them in a coat and Russian cookie, not Georgia in NATO.
    Georgia as part of Russia Russian Orthodox wants. And not in the bloody aggressive NATO!
    Enough! If at least one of our country is land, the people will join NATO - IT'S ALREADY A LOSE! This means that we merged our land and our people.
    Stop sleeping Russian Orthodox Christians, Russia Russian Orthodox Christian. It is necessary to do so that our countries and peoples and lands themselves and by their decision return to Russian Orthodox Christian Russia. They become Russian Christian, Russian Orthodox Christians, the people of Russia Russian Orthodox Christian. Reunited , returned home, as they always have been: Russia, the Russian Empire, the USSR-Russia. They themselves, voluntarily, at will, desire, without aggression from the Russian Orthodox Christians, Russia Russian Orthodox Christian, people of Russia Russian Orthodox Christian.
    But if at least one piece of our land and our people join NATO or some other alliance with the enemy, the Russians are already a loss!
  15. Belarus is Russia
    Belarus is Russia 1 February 2018 22: 30
    0
    Quote: CAT BAYUN
    The issue of joining NATO does not shine by definition: there are territorial claims.
    And the survey .. Yes, in jo ... well, shove this survey deeper.

    Ahahaha. What naive you are. Yes, they wanted to spit on everything and everyone. They will gladly take and put their bases at least a scrap closer to Russia. And then they will pump claims to Russia territorial. Until they divide and divide Russia, Russian Orthodox Christian and they won’t turn it into a colony of Russian Orthodox Christians. the people of Russia Russian Orthodox Christian into slaves, but rebellious people will be killed and slaughtered. And us together with them.
    And these tales and noodles there about some complaints, smiles to us are for such fools, I'm sorry, of course, like you, to be trusted and in such a stupid state and not to do anything. They keep us for idiots, you know brother?
    We must unite in Russia and be part of the Russian Orthodox Christian Russia, the Russian Orthodox Christians, become the Russian Orthodox Christian, the Russian Orthodox Christians, the people of Russia the Russian Orthodox Christian, as we used to be, one country and one Russian-Russian Orthodox Christian nation Christian, Russian Orthodox Christians, the people of Russia Russian Orthodox Christian: Russia, the Russian Empire, the USSR-Russia. Until we were individually turned into colonies and into slaves and cannon fodder or destroyed, and did not take on the strongest of us-Russia Russian Orthodox Christian, Russian Orthodox Christians.
    And these fairy tales, smiles, promises are for suckers brother. We need to unite until we are killed. And our lands and our people should be Russian Orthodox in Russia, and not get into the enemy and become a colony. And our people, people - should also be Russian Orthodox Christian in Russia and protected. And not turn into slaves and cannon fodder.
  16. VladGashek
    VladGashek 1 February 2018 23: 21
    0
    Who pays, he orders the music. Carnegie gave a grant, received the required amount of support for NATO and the EU by Georgians. What do we need? Need a RF Georgia? I think no. It is necessary to raise Russia, and not squander money on the Georgians and the different suburbs there. Hai live the way they think they are in the narcotic dope of pan-European unity. We should only care about the fate of Russia and the benefit of every Russian.
  17. Belarus is Russia
    Belarus is Russia 1 February 2018 23: 28
    0
    Quote: Vladgashek
    Who pays, he orders the music. Carnegie gave a grant, received the required amount of support for NATO and the EU by Georgians. What do we need? Need a RF Georgia? I think no. It is necessary to raise Russia, and not squander money on the Georgians and the different suburbs there. Hai live the way they think they are in the narcotic dope of pan-European unity. We should only care about the fate of Russia and the benefit of every Russian.

    Are you squandering our lands and people ???? Our lands and people, should be with us, as part of Russia, the Russian Orthodox Christian, and OUR Russian troops and not the enemy should stand on our lands.
    But Georgia and Georgians and Russians living there are our people.
    And not that Georgia should be under enemy military bases or camps of mercenaries, so you completely surround all of Russia with enemy military bases, troops, camps of mercenaries and missile defense. You will be surrounded, squeezed and crushed completely destroyed. Russian Orthodox Christian, Russian Orthodox Christians surrounded , the people of Russia Russian Orthodox Christian — even without a war in this case, you can squeeze — when it is in a dense ring of enemy military bases and missile defense is not farted. They will completely block off oxygen.
    Tell your tales for suckers.
    Georgia is Russia, Georgians, Russians living there are OUR people: Russia, the Russian Empire, the USSR-Russia. And our task is to reunite both peacefully and calmly, at our request and voluntary desire. And not to let the strangers go there. us troops, soldiers, military bases and camps of mercenaries. And turn our lands into their colonies, and turn our people into slaves and cannon fodder, which the United States will send to fight with us instead of American Americans and for US interests.
    All the CIS and former republics of the USSR — should reunite with Russia — become Russia Russian Orthodox Christian, Russian Orthodox Christians, the people of Russia Russian Orthodox Christian. It will be enough for our common security and survival.
  18. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 2 February 2018 01: 04
    +2
    Georgia and NATO ???, grandfather I.V. Stalin will turn over in his grave.
  19. solovald
    solovald 2 February 2018 05: 27
    0
    The main thing is not that, due to some circumstances, Georgia cannot join NATO, but that% of those who wish are huge, i.e. Georgians in bulk are eager for this organization.
  20. Vadim Sh.
    Vadim Sh. 2 February 2018 10: 40
    0
    Let them come in, the same nation can only sing and trade in the market, and then the general sale of weapons will begin after joining NATO, in 2008 the US General Counselor spoke out about this army - you can’t even trust the ARBU, not just weapons, all without a trace will disappear. laughing
  21. Belarus is Russia
    Belarus is Russia 2 February 2018 19: 16
    0
    Quote: Vadim Sh.
    Let them come in, the same nation can only sing and trade in the market, and then the general sale of weapons will begin after joining NATO, in 2008 the US General Counselor spoke out about this army - you can’t even trust the ARBU, not just weapons, all without a trace will disappear. laughing

    You - * ...! YOU ARE OUR ENEMY AND TRAITOR! ENEMY AND TRAITOR OF THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHRISTIANS, RUSSIA THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX, PEOPLE OF RUSSIA THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN!
    But NATO doesn’t care about Georgians. NATO needs Georgian territory, but Georgians are in the quality of slaves and cannon fodder. So that instead of Americans and for US interests they should be sent, including Russian Orthodox Christian against Russia. And they will turn Georgians into cannon fodder in the war against Russian Orthodox Christians, against Russian Orthodox Christian Russia, against the Russian Orthodox Christian people of Russia.
    Let not Georgia and Georgians and Russians living in NATO join them. And do not surround Russian Orthodox Christians, Russian Orthodox Christians, Russian Orthodox Christians with Russian military bases hostile to Russia. Soldiers, troops and mercenaries and missile defense in Georgia .. And then they do not turn Georgians into Russians and Russia; they don’t turn Georgia into a colony, and Georgians and Russians living there as slaves and cannon fodder will be sent to fight against Russian Orthodox Christians, against Russian Orthodox Christian, against Russian people Russian Orthodox Christian.
    Let Georgia, Georgians and Russians living there, become part of Russia Russian Orthodox Christian, to Russian Orthodox Christians, HOME - as we were Russia, the Russian Empire, the USSR, Russia .. Become Russia Russian Orthodox Christian, Russian Orthodox Christians, people Russia’s Russian Orthodox Christian. And it’s good and peaceful in the good of the world and under the protection of Russian Orthodox Christians, Russia Russian Orthodox Christian, the people of Russia Russian Orthodox Christian live well and peacefully. And our Russian troops, let them stand in Tbilisi, and not the enemy to us troops. And ON NATO!
    NEHER ON OUR LAND TO STAND ALIEN WARS, SOLDIERS AND MILITARY BASES. NEHER OUR LAND TO GRAB, OCCUPIATE AND TURN TO A COLONY, AND OUR PEOPLE ARE SLAVES, NOT MORRIDLY.
    GEORGIA IS RUSSIA! Georgians, Russians living there are OUR people, OUR people!
    CIS IS OUR LANDS. And the people of the CIS are OUR people and the people of Russia are Russian Orthodox Christian, Russian Orthodox Christians, the people of Russia Russian Orthodox Christian.

    Vadim Sh. -Remove the Russian flag-tricolor !!! And put the American flag and emblem NATO-TRAITOR AND THE ENEMY!
  22. Belarus is Russia
    Belarus is Russia 2 February 2018 19: 25
    0
    Quote: solovald
    The main thing is not that, due to some circumstances, Georgia cannot join NATO, but that% of those who wish are huge, i.e. Georgians in bulk are eager for this organization.

    It’s not the Georgians who are tearing there, but the pro-Western government. The Georgians are tearing to Russia.