In post-Soviet Russia, the Bolsheviks were accused of inciting the Civil War. They say that they overthrew the "legitimate" Provisional Government, dispersed the Constituent Assembly, by their decrees they destroyed the bourgeois-democratic republic that had begun to take shape. Destroyed democratic Russia, following the path of reunification with the European civilization. They unleashed the "red terror", destroying the best part of the Russian people: the aristocracy, the nobility, the clergy, the Russian intelligentsia, the merchants and the bourgeoisie as a whole.
At the same time they killed Tsar Nicholas, his family. This allowed us to create the myth that it was the Bolsheviks who destroyed the autocracy, overthrew the tsar and destroyed the Russian empire. And then, in order to retain power and create their own “bloody” totalitarian empire (in the West, it would later be called the “evil empire”), they drowned the country in blood. Attempts by the “noble” whites to save Russia, “the one and indivisible”, failed due to excessive “chivalry”. The Reds acted cruelly and bloody, not afraid of massacres. Crowds of peasants were driven into their army, barrage detachments of internationalist revolutionaries (Chinese, Hungarians, Latvians, etc.) were set up in the rear, and small white troops were filled up with cannon fodder.
Thus, the alleged Bolsheviks and staged a bloody Troubles in Russia, which led to the death of "old Russia", millions of victims and the creation of a "bloody" Red Empire, the "Soviet concentration camp." This myth is very beneficial to the West, as it allows to solve a wide range of tasks. First, to morally crush the Russian people, to make them forever "guilty" in all possible and impossible sins. It turns out that the USSR was not the most advanced country on the planet, having made a leap forward for hundreds of years to create a just order in the interests of the people, but a "concentration camp" where the "best part" of the Russian people was exterminated and only scoops-slaves remained.
Secondly, to use this myth in the information war against Russia, to make excuses, apologize. To create the image of the Russian "evil empire", "Russian Mordor" in the eyes of the western man in the street. That allows you to use in the fight against Russia any methods and justify them in advance. Like, with the "Russian subhuman (orcs)" in another way and not.
Thirdly, one can constantly clash, set off Russians with small nations that were still part of Russia, or nations that were separated during the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Russian Empire, and were also part of the socialist camp. To speculate on the theme of “Russian (Soviet) occupation”, unjust deportation, Russian colonialism, etc. We agreed that Stalin’s empire was worse than the Hitler Reich and the Red Army did not liberate Europe, but “occupied”. Also bring Russia all sorts of bills for the "occupation" and "colonization." All this is done easily, so in Russia itself the Soviet period stories It is considered a significant part of the "elite" lost, defective.
Fourth, it is possible to conduct informational work on the final "recoding" (programming) of the top of the Russian Federation. She is gradually declared the heiress of the elite of the Russian Empire, removing the Soviet period. And for the "new nobility" in the West partners. The USSR is a "mistake of history." Russia is the periphery of a western (European) civilization, and not a separate original Russian civilization. Bourgeois-democratic, capitalist, and in fact, non-slave-owning, system is normal.
In reality, Russian distemper 1917-1920's. was caused by two determining factors. The first is the millennial confrontation between Russia and the West. The masters of the West have been building the world slave-owning order from century to century - this is their main goal. Complete, absolute subordination of man to the will of the "master-elect".
Russia is the main opponent of Western “masons-architects”. In Russia, there is an image of a fair world order, without parasitizing the few "chosen" over the masses. Therefore, the West is always focused on solving the “Russian question” - the destruction of the Russian civilization and the Russian matrix-code (social justice and ethics of conscience). And for this it is necessary to dismember and destroy the Russian superethnos, with reprogramming and assimilating its remnants, turning the Russians into ethnographic material, which in the second generation will become part of the American, British, French, Turkish, Chinese, etc.
Therefore, the masters of the West, seeing the weakness of the Russian Empire and the project of the Romanovs (which was generally aimed at merging with the "enlightened West"), which was shown during the Crimean War, the war with Japan and the First Revolution, relied on the destruction of Tsarist Russia. All methods and tools were used: from drawing Russia into a suicidal world war and the destructive actions of diplomats and special services to activating the numerous “fifth column”, which was provided with organizational, material support in organizing the revolution.
The main detonator for the destruction of the Russian Empire was the First World War, unleashed by the masters of France, England and the United States. The war was supposed to destroy the old empires - Russian, Austro-Hungarian, German and Turkish. This made it possible to build a “new world order” based on “democratic values”. In reality, all the real power belonged to financial capital - the “gold elite” (“financial international”, “owners of money”, “global backstage”, etc.). The “democratically elected” presidents, prime ministers, governments, parliaments, governors, senators and deputies were only a cover for the real owners of the planet.
The war allowed Russia to blow up a weakened internal problems of Russia from the inside. The second factor that destroyed the Russian empire and autocracy is the fundamental internal contradictions. If the organism of the Russian Empire were healthy, no external "viruses" could have destroyed it.
The West has repeatedly tried to crush the Russian state, but all its attacks were repulsed - the war with the Swedish empire, the invasion of Napoleon’s all-European army, the Decembrist uprising, the Eastern (Crimean) war, provoked by the Westerners, the attacks of Persia and Turkey. However, by the end of XIX - beginning of XX centuries. it became clear that the Russian Empire was seriously ill. For centuries, the accumulated contradictions and faults had to be resolved by the “revolution from above,” otherwise unrest was inevitable. Nicholas I and Alexander III "frozen" the empire, restraining the destructive processes. Under Alexander II, they tried to follow the path of liberalization and the Western way - the development of capitalist and bourgeois relations, which only “rocked the boat”.
Under Nicholas II, Russia approached the "break point". It was necessary to resolve the urgent problems, or they were culturally lagging behind the advanced Western powers (the elite spoke Western languages, preferred to live in Western capitals, dressed in Western fashion, etc.), financial and technological dependence on them, made Russian semi-colony. The government of Nikolai Alexandrovich led a controversial policy - at the same time trying to “freeze” the situation and reform Russia by indulging the iberales-Westerners. This finally destabilized the situation. At the same time, St. Petersburg allowed the West to push us against Japan, which became a rehearsal of a world war and showed the weakness of Russia to the Westernizers. They were able to suppress the first revolution, but it was clear that a new big war could lead to a powerful social explosion and confusion. The most far-sighted people in Russia understood this perfectly well - Stolypin, Durnovo, Rasputin, Alexey Vandam, but they were not heard. And Stolypin and Rasputin, who could have an impact on the king, physically eliminated. As a result, Russia was confronted with Germany, which allowed the owners of the West to organize February and crush the autocracy.
The masters of the West would not have been able to destroy the autocracy and the empire of the Romanovs if Russia had not matured for this. Under the Romanovs, “mines” were laid in Russia, which led to the 1917 disaster of the year. There were several main such “mines”. First, under Nikon and later (especially under Peter I), Russian Orthodoxy underwent a split and was emasculated, lost its fiery essence. The best part of the Russian people - the Old Believers, with their ethics of conscience and spiritual purity, diligence, refusal from the dope - tobacco and alcohol, were excluded from common life, were subjected to brutal repression and eventually created their own world. Nikonian Orthodoxy became official, form without content. Russia has lost its "connection with the sky", spiritual nourishment. By 1917, the majority of the population was indifferent to Christianity, only outwardly being Christians (by the end of the USSR, the same thing happened with the communist ideology, which led to the 1985-1993 catastrophe). Hence the 1917 disaster and the following years, when churches and monasteries were destroyed, the clergy were destroyed, and the people for the most part looked at it indifferently. The clergy lost the "holy spirit" (except for individual righteous and old men) and ceased to be one of their pillars of the Russian state.
Second, the social justice was destroyed in the Russian Empire. Earlier, the Russian people were also divided into higher classes — nobles (boyars, boyars' children) and working people. But this was due to the need for constant mobilization of forces and means. Russia-Russia almost all the time fought. Nobles received the use of the peasants to be able to arm themselves, arm the servants and go to war at the first request of the prince-king. They paid for the elite status with blood and sweat, personal life-long service and the service of children. Under the Romanovs, this system was destroyed. Nobles were able to live social parasites all their lives. While a significant part of the nobility served honestly, there were Rumyantsevs, Suvorovs, Ushakovs, Nakhimovs, Kutuzovs and Bagration. But by the end of the existence of the empire a significant part of the aristocracy and nobility degenerated, forgot how to fight, wanted to live in luxury and luxury (preferably in the capital or abroad). And the overwhelming part of the people - the peasants, felt this universal injustice (especially considering the still unresolved land issue), and was eager to restore justice.
Thirdly, the Romanovs split the people not only into Nikonians and Old Believers, but also into “European nobles” and the rest of the people (more than 90%). The top society "lived in Europe" - spoke German, French and English, dressed in European fashion, lived in Western Europe for a long time (often and most of her life), read European literature, admired European achievements of art, science and technology, built palaces (instead of schools, manufactories and railways). And the means for the “beautiful life” were sucked out of Russia and the people. The common people as a whole preserved Russian culture and language.
The rest of these fundamental errors also occurred. In particular, the foreign policy of St. Petersburg was often in the interests of the European capitals - Berlin, Vienna, Paris and London, and not the Russian people. Russian soldiers were often used as cannon fodder. For example, a series of wars with France, Napoleon was in the interests of Austria, Prussia and England. And the Russians and the French had no reason to kill each other. The First World War solved the global interests of the owners of the West, the strategic interests of the United States, Britain, France. The Russians and the Germans had no reason to kill each other.
Thus, the forces and means, the time of Russia and the Russian people were spent in the name of foreign interests. Although Russia's global interests were in the South and East. Russia had to solve the thousand-year task of mastering Constantinople-Constantinople, the straits. To secure the Caucasus, including the Armenian regions remaining under the Turks, to go to Persia and India to the southern seas. In the East, to preserve and develop Russian America (the sale of Russian America is one of the most serious strategic mistakes of the Romanovs), taking control of the northern part of the Pacific Ocean, to firmly establish itself in Korea and China. Japan could be our partner and ally, helping to contain the Anglo-Saxons in the Pacific. That is, the Romanov empire missed the opportunity to launch the process of Russian globalization. With the simultaneous accelerated development of the Russian North, Siberia, the Far East and Turkestan.
Not to mention the need for the development of Russian education and science, the education of the whole people, forced industrialization, the solution of land and work issues, the elimination of distortions in national politics (in particular, Finnish, Polish issues). All this was not done by the Romanovs, which caused the collapse of their project. These problems and contradictions were solved by the Bolsheviks.
To be continued ...