Trump: the presence of the US Army in Afghanistan will be indefinite

27
The presence of the United States in Afghanistan will not be limited to artificial timeframes, the rules for conducting combat in this republic for American military personnel have been changed.

The corresponding statement was made on Tuesday by US President Donald Trump, speaking with the traditional message "On the situation of the country" at a joint meeting of the Senate and the House of Representatives of the US Congress.



Trump: the presence of the US Army in Afghanistan will be indefinite


Our warriors in Afghanistan have received new rules of engagement. Along with their valiant Afghan partners, artificial time frames no longer discredit our armed forces, and we no longer tell our enemies about our plans.
- He said.

The head of state 1 of August last year announced a new American strategy for South Asia, which provides a forceful scenario for solving the Afghan problem. From now on, Washington will not publish data on the size of its contingent in this country and disclose plans to start or end military operations, and the priority is the fight against terrorism. According to US media reports, Trump decided to additionally send several thousand troops to Afghanistan, TASS reports.
  • http://nevsepic.com.ua/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    31 January 2018 13: 08
    Well said. Almost as eternal, of course it's a pity for the guys (albeit the Americans) who will forever remain in Afghanistan.
    1. +2
      31 January 2018 13: 11
      Slowly creep into Central Asia.
      1. +11
        31 January 2018 13: 15
        United States presence in Afghanistan will not be limited to artificial timelines
        Who would doubt that . Where they come there remain either forever or until the bloody pendell (so far only Vietnam has managed)
        1. +1
          31 January 2018 15: 14
          Quote: KVU-NSVD
          United States presence in Afghanistan will not be limited to artificial timelines
          Who would doubt that . Where they come there remain either forever or until the bloody pendell (so far only Vietnam has managed)
          Cuba. Iran. North Korea (Israel, for milking and milking)) They even threw them in Africa ..
        2. 0
          31 January 2018 21: 15
          ----------- (only Vietnam has managed so far) ------------ Well, not without our help
      2. +2
        31 January 2018 13: 52
        Quote: dorz
        Slowly creep into Central Asia.

        it's been slowly for decades ... if you haven’t noticed ...
    2. +13
      31 January 2018 13: 21
      Quote: andre
      sorry of course the guys (albeit Americans) who will forever remain lying in Afghanistan

      Not a bit sorry, nobody called them there. Yes
      1. dSK
        +1
        31 January 2018 13: 30
        Quote: vlad66
        nobody called them there.

        Republican Trump "more honest", straighter daemonKrata of Abama.
        1. +9
          31 January 2018 13: 55
          All of them Sergey are smeared with some kakahs, only one on the left, the other on the right. laughing hi
          1. +2
            31 January 2018 14: 23
            Both are plutocrats, only the sign on the facade is changing. negative
            Volodya, hello hi
      2. +2
        31 January 2018 14: 51
        Quote: vlad66
        Not a bit sorry, nobody called them there.

        It remains to wish success to the "Taliban partisans" in their just cause, the liberation of the homeland from the American invaders. laughing
        At the same time, throw up weapons so that they can "lock up" the bastards at their bases. hi
    3. 0
      31 January 2018 15: 58
      Quote: andre
      Well said. Almost as eternal, of course it's a pity for the guys (albeit the Americans) who will forever remain in Afghanistan.

      The graves will remain in the event of evaporation, and they will be taken out to Black Tulips.
  2. +5
    31 January 2018 13: 10
    The head of state on August 1 last year announced a new US strategy for South Asia, which provides for a forceful scenario to solve the Afghan problem.


    Deeper and deeper, stuck for the most I can not.
    1. +2
      31 January 2018 14: 13
      I remember once a dodgy one nigep the African-American promised to withdraw the star-striped army from the territory of Afghanistan, and already “several thousand” had planned to return back. The American "partners" are always in their roles, like a capricious slut, I want not, I will not give. In the bazaar, such figures are kicked near the garbage can, and in business they put up or dribble dibs in a forest ditch. How can you deal with them?
      1. 0
        31 January 2018 16: 10
        Quote: KondratKo
        I remember once a dodgy one nigep the African-American promised to withdraw the star-striped army from the territory of Afghanistan, and already “several thousand” had planned to return back. The American "partners" are always in their roles, like a capricious slut, I want not, I will not give. In the bazaar, such figures are kicked near the garbage can, and in business they put up or dribble dibs in a forest ditch. How can you deal with them?

        We took a social commitment to collect a record amount of poppy.
  3. +4
    31 January 2018 13: 14
    But is this being done to continue the destabilization of Central Asia and the increasing saturation of our country with products from poppy fields in Afghanistan ...
    1. +7
      31 January 2018 13: 22
      War on our borders and its support, that’s their goal.
  4. 0
    31 January 2018 13: 16
    Like, this is "our cow and we will milk it." laughing .
  5. +3
    31 January 2018 13: 23
    Now rivers of heroin will flow into our country, killing youth - our future, I think this is their main goal in Afghanistan.
  6. +1
    31 January 2018 13: 24
    England-50 years set a record for finding its troops. We are a little more than 10. Let's see how long the United States lasts.
  7. +3
    31 January 2018 13: 32
    I think they are fighting off the sale of heroin ...
  8. +3
    31 January 2018 13: 55
    Well, you need to cover the dope. And then suddenly the owner’s supply will change ....
  9. 0
    31 January 2018 13: 59
    Afghan Anasha outweighs common sense.
  10. +1
    31 January 2018 14: 03
    Trump: the presence of the US Army in Afghanistan will be indefinite
    Like state terrorism, the United States all over the world unfortunately, until this empire of evil and blood -usa falls! ....
  11. +2
    31 January 2018 15: 32
    Trump: the presence of the US Army in Afghanistan will be indefinite

    Well, I wanted so! New American Doctrine - WANT!
    And the opinion of the Afghans? And who is it?
  12. +1
    31 January 2018 16: 04
    It is clear that the Yankees decided to stay in Afghanistan until the last. Given the growing strain, they need to double, or maybe triple their contingent. They have already announced figures to increase losses. The Taliban arrives at the expense of the squeezed out of Syria barmaley. But for the Amer ruling elite it is more important to keep drug trafficking and an important bridgehead in this region, to the fact that losses can double, they do not care, their gods are loot and power.
  13. 0
    31 January 2018 19: 58
    There is one episode in the film "Cargo 300" (on found a passage), where am. the prince said: "The British have left, and you will leave, but we will remain." Let them stay, they will only receive what they arranged for us, only 100 times more! We are not greedy !!! soldier

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"