Head of Constitutional Court: Shareholders must pay compensation from funds withdrawn from the Russian Federation by Yukos

19
Chairman of the Constitutional Court of Russia Valery Zorkin commented on the claims of the ECHR against Russia in the so-called “Yukos case”. We are talking about claims of the following nature: the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, after the decision of the ECHR on “the need to repay debt to shareholders”, in turn, recognized the Russian laws above the decisions of the European Court of Justice and effectively canceled the decision of the ECHR in respect of Russia.

According to Valery Zorkin, if the ECHR insists on repaying a certain debt to the shareholders of YUKOS, then it would be possible to make payments from the funds withdrawn by the company’s management, including major shareholders, from Russia.



Head of Constitutional Court: Shareholders must pay compensation from funds withdrawn from the Russian Federation by Yukos


Chairman of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (quote TASS):
The famous decision on YUKOS - here Europe was unhappy. But we, entering the Council of Europe, were guided by our Constitution. The decision on the YUKOS case was made in connection with the existence of a three-year tax collection period, which was deliberately violated by YUKOS. The constitutional court proceeded from the fact that the payer, by their actions, artificially slowed down the normal course of a three-year term for collection - this is a violation of the Constitution. The budget suffers from it, taxpayers suffer. Yukos shareholders are jointly and severally liable for tax evasion.


According to the chairman of the Constitutional Court, the ECHR "was offended by such a decision."

Valeria Zorkin:
We offered to open accounts of the former management of the company, on which there are money illegally withdrawn from Russia. Of these funds, Russia could receive compensation for the taxes not received, and shareholders could recover their losses.


The head of the Constitutional Court said that in Europe they had refused to open accounts for the management of the YUKOS company.
  • www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    31 January 2018 12: 00
    A bad example is contagious, and it opens Pandora's box. You need to fight for the return of the stolen goods, and not to legalize the expropriation of the stolen by foreign courts, the same thieves. And such, besides Yukos, over the years of the collapse of the country, there were so many.
    1. +17
      31 January 2018 12: 17
      It is necessary to object to Russian national amusement - headhunting with ice axes.
      I am sure that none of us will be against it.
      And, the most successful ones can also give out prizes, it is possible with money, as a percentage of what can be returned.
      Such scum - enemies of the people - only physically eliminate. Other methods are not serious.
      1. +13
        31 January 2018 12: 19
        Quote: Pax tecum
        It is necessary to object to Russian national amusement - headhunting with ice axes.

        Pavel Sudoplatov, unfortunately, are waiting for all the orders. request
      2. +5
        31 January 2018 12: 23
        But it’s quite an effective method - not the methods are important, the result is important. good If funds that we believe have been stolen, but we are denied information on these funds, are withdrawn to the conditional Swiss bank “horns and hooves”, then it is permissible and advisable to use this ice pick or soldering iron to the management (employees) of this bank to receive information. am Because their actions are the protection of criminals !! negative And which is much more important - not because of "spiritual convictions", but only because of material interest, which means we can talk about criminal conspiracy or "buying up stolen goods" am
        1. +1
          31 January 2018 12: 31
          Quote: Mih1974
          ... so you can talk about criminal conspiracy or "buying up stolen goods" am

          Good idea. Fair.
          All that is needed is an instrument of influence on such “connoisseurs of stolen goods”.
          The threat of the use of military force, with its demonstration and / or our economic sanctions to such concealing countries, will ward off the desire to quarrel with Russia altogether and make senseless and suicidal theft and transfer of capital from Russia.
          There would be a will.
          "Dushka is not enough" © the Kremlin. This is not the Soviet socialist breed of leaders.
          Radically tough? Yes! And, there are no other effective methods and never will be.
          1. win
            +2
            31 January 2018 12: 58
            The Hague court sentenced Russia to pay $ 50 billion in favor of Yukos.
            Mytishchi court overturned the decision of the Hague court on the same day fool
            1. 0
              31 January 2018 13: 40
              Normal move to pay out of Khodorkovsky’s money. It will be quieter. And then he already imagines himself the second Soros. hi
              So Soros will soon glue the flippers, and this one is going to live and harm for a long time ...
          2. +2
            31 January 2018 13: 07
            For example, the blockade of transfers and, generally, the raising of the massive world buoy about "dispossession", paired with China itself. After all, they also probably loot flows there. Up to the threat of a complete blockade of relations with this country. Switzerland is certainly a rich country, but Russia has a greater world weight, and moreover, there will be a significant blow to them in the economy. Their own mattresses were so bent on disclosing information. The main thing here is to first "clean up" with an ice ax in the Russian government itself. And it already hurts a lot of lovers of Swiss alm and "jamon parmesan" wound up in power.
    2. +4
      31 January 2018 12: 39
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      A bad example is contagious, and it opens Pandora's box. You need to fight for the return of the stolen goods, and not to legalize the expropriation of the stolen by foreign courts, the same thieves. And such, besides Yukos, over the years of the collapse of the country, there were so many.

      Not in this case. Khodorkovsky is a Rothschild man. Therefore, the call to “unlock shareholder accounts” is a call to collect debts from the Rothschilds. And they want to collect debts from the budget of Russia.
      Google on the topic of Khodorkovsky and the Rothschilds. You will find many interesting things.
  2. +2
    31 January 2018 12: 33
    The head of the Constitutional Court said that in Europe they had refused to open accounts for the management of the YUKOS company.
    Well, of course, according to the rules of the ECHR, stolen from Russia and stored abroad assets are holy and are not subject to return. Zorkin is right, make claims against thieves whom you hide under various pretexts, let these thieves return the stolen things to Russia.
  3. +2
    31 January 2018 12: 35
    So, perhaps, it was not necessary to give funds to withdraw from Russia? Perhaps, to open criminal cases before this or that company ceases to be friends with the authorities?
    1. +2
      31 January 2018 12: 53
      Quote: friend of animals
      So, perhaps, it was not necessary to give funds to withdraw from Russia? Perhaps, to open criminal cases before this or that company ceases to be friends with the authorities?

      The presumption of innocence of a citizen is an assumption according to which a person is presumed innocent until proved guilty in the manner prescribed by law
      1. 0
        31 January 2018 13: 37
        And, during this time, while guilty / innocence will be proved, whole cities and countries can be made bankrupt. What nonsense when it comes to national security. So you can do everything .... And, the beneficiaries will laugh, while you will “prove”, the jury are bad.
        So the country was dragged by this method of inaction.
        Here another mechanism and tools of persuasion / coercion are needed.
        1. 0
          2 February 2018 05: 42
          Quote: Pax tecum
          And, during this time, while guilty / innocence will be proved, whole cities and countries can be made bankrupt. What nonsense when it comes to national security. So you can do everything .... And, the beneficiaries will laugh, while you will “prove”, the jury are bad.

          unfortunately but true.
          there are not many options:
          - either you behave as respectable and you get everything that you wrote above
          - either you behave like an “extreme” “urkagan”.

          The first option is supposedly "suffered". the second is a blathat urka.
          Your choice?
  4. win
    +6
    31 January 2018 12: 55
    In Saudi Arabia, all the largest corrupt officials were tied up in bulk, and almost all of them agreed to cooperate with the investigation and return the money.
    If something like this happened in Russia, then there would be enough babosos to build a socially oriented state,
    and for change buy Saudi Arabia belay
    1. +3
      31 January 2018 13: 38
      Bravo, my friend !!!
      He said beautifully.
    2. +1
      1 February 2018 14: 08
      Handsome 5+
    3. 0
      2 February 2018 05: 46
      Quote: Siegen
      In Saudi Arabia, all the largest corrupt officials were tied up in bulk, and almost all of them agreed to cooperate with the investigation and return the money.
      If something like this happened in Russia, then there would be enough babosos to build a socially oriented state,
      and for change buy Saudi Arabia belay

      no one forgot to look at the genealogy of these "corrupt officials"?
      no one forgot to see the news from that country over the past year?
      Well, look! laughing
      baby, well, don’t be like that ... what you imagine ...
  5. +1
    31 January 2018 15: 15
    Need to plant!
    Only plant correctly .... Make the stake higher, ruff on that stake chop ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"