US published footage of the Su-27 fighter jet of an American reconnaissance aircraft

January 31 2018 78

The headquarters of the US Navy published footage of the Russian fighter Su-27 of the American reconnaissance aircraft EP-3E Aries II. The interception took place in neutral airspace near the coast of Crimea - south of the city of Yalta.

On the frame you can see how the Russian fighter flies a few meters from the US reconnaissance aircraft, demonstrating its missile weapons. We are talking about air-to-air missiles.

Recall that earlier in the Pentagon and the State Department, the United States stated that the Su-27 Russian Federation Air Force flew up to an American aircraft at a distance of about 1,5 m. According to Heather Nauert (State Department Speaker), such a "Russian pilot behavior could provoke a plane crash," and unacceptable piloting. ”The State Department does not comment on whether it is permissible to find an American reconnaissance aircraft several thousand kilometers from the United States.

On the presented frames, you can see that the distance from the Su-27 fighter of the Russian Aeronautical Spacecraft to the reconnaissance aircraft of the US Air Force is slightly more than one and a half meters.

The official release of the American headquarters:

29 January 2018 of the year, the Russian Su-27 aircraft intercepted an EP-3 aircraft of the US Air Force that was in international airspace over the Black Sea. This interaction was found to be unsafe due to the Su-27 approaching up to five feet and intersecting the direct flight path of EP-3, with the result that EP-3 was forced to fly through a Su-27 jet stream. The duration of the accompaniment lasted 2 hours 40 minutes.

US Navy

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Spartanez300

+18

31 January 2018 06: 13

Let them be sure that there is always someone to meet them, they let them see in their pants.
1. Evil543
  
  +9
  
  31 January 2018 06: 18
  
  He showed the missiles, made it clear that he was not joking, and so they dumped him ...
  1. siberalt
    
    +10
    
    31 January 2018 06: 36
    
    "The escort lasted 2 hours 40 minutes." It seems that our pilot was tired of escorting.
    1. vlad66
      
      +15
      
      31 January 2018 08: 27
      
      Do not hell to make a striped duck at our borders.
      1. Vladimir16
        
        +11
        
        31 January 2018 08: 58
        
        Duration escorts went on 2 hours 40 minutes.
        
        Duration continued Where do you find scribblers?
        
        Romanenko
        
        +9
        
        31 January 2018 09: 03
        
        Well, after all, they fly in butter, but the duration is long and it turns out ....
        It’s just a misfortune lately with the Russian language.
        
        Secondly,
        
        0
        
        31 January 2018 09: 57
        
        Well beautiful, what else can I say !!!!
        
        Paranoid50
        
        +7
        
        31 January 2018 10: 45
        
        Quote: Romanenko
        after all, they fly in oil, but the duration is long and it turns out ....
        
        The motto of modern media is: "It makes no sense to comprehend the meaning of meaningless thoughts."
        
        a housewife
        
        +2
        
        31 January 2018 10: 07
        
        They probably just translated it so they had it written in the English text. Of course, it was possible to replace the word, but not a literary text.
      2. Korax71
        
        0
        
        31 January 2018 15: 39
        
        And ours can fly and float off their shores ????? these are neutral waters. They have the right
    2. Mar.Tirah
      
      0
      
      31 January 2018 08: 29
      
      In Soviet times, escort continued for 6 hours in a row. Kerosene took off from fighters, be healthy .. That's why ergonomic engines are needed
      1. Romanenko
        
        +16
        
        31 January 2018 09: 02
        
        Quote: That's why ergonomic engines are needed ...
        Economical, ergonomics are a bit different
        
        Mar.Tirah
        
        +1
        
        31 January 2018 09: 20
        
        Both economical and ergonomic! One does not interfere with the other. All designers strive for this. Do not carp, you understand what I mean!
      2. sharp-lad
        
        0
        
        31 January 2018 22: 55
        
        Ergonomics - Ergonomics in the initial sense is the efficiency of a production tool or system in ergonomics. Efficiency is understood as the highest performance with the least probability of error (of the user but not the device) ...
        Ergonomics - equipment design that takes into account human / machine interaction, which reduces the likelihood of operator error, increase the comfort of his working conditions ...
        Economy - Cost-effectiveness of the cost of goods compared with equivalent products available on the market. (See: Budget Efficiency) Fuel Efficiency: Specific Fuel Consumption. Profitability in operation, cost and profitability ...
  2. victorsh
    
    +3
    
    31 January 2018 07: 32
    
    This is normal practice. In the 2000's, a similar situation was with Chinese friends in DV Raz. "The passenger went astray" from the route and flew into our territory. The second time the fighter was lifted and it showed-I am armed. Everyone. Fly along the route.
2. ul_vitalii
  
  +20
  
  31 January 2018 06: 19
  
  Wherever you go, everywhere their "laymen" meet and most importantly, only at our borders.
  1. Lelek
    
    0
    
    31 January 2018 11: 44
    
    Quote: ul_vitalii
    Wherever you go, everywhere their "laymen" meet and most importantly, only at our borders.
    
    And yesterday, two NATO “boxes” entered the Black Sea. The adversaries are up to something.
3. tracer
  
  0
  
  31 January 2018 06: 26
  
  The problem is that they have orders of magnitude larger ... any.
  1. dog breeder
    
    +9
    
    31 January 2018 07: 16
    
    tracer Today, 06:26 ↑ New
    The problem is that they have orders of magnitude larger ... any.
    There is, of course, a proverb that one is not a warrior in the field, but this is not about Russia. There is a lot of evidence for this, a feat of the same Sirotinin. And about the skill of our pilots, the Americans themselves trumpeted the whole world. Yes, in what they are ahead of us, but when it comes to the nerve, then even diapers can not persuade them.
    1. Korax71
      
      0
      
      31 January 2018 15: 47
      
      Sirotinin is an isolated case. Then you remember how many people gave up. 41 was enough. There was already one such comrade who faithfully believed the exclusivity of one nation over another. How it ended everyone knows. And as for diapers, everyone is obsessed with the same it comes to a fight. here nationality does not affect. these are individual qualities.
      1. dog breeder
        
        +1
        
        31 January 2018 17: 17
        
        I wonder what you were taught at school. Well, and probably about the soldier’s ingenuity of the Russian you also do not know. And about diapers, find materials on the Battle of Stalingrad.
        
        Korax71
        
        +1
        
        1 February 2018 02: 50
        
        I'll tell you right now, but you won’t like it. For that matter, if you want to compare fearlessness or heroism, whatever you call it, then look for information about the same heroes of Germany, England, the United States, and Japan. There will be order. although you haven’t been taught this at school. the truth is another misfortune, for us they are not heroes. about the soldier’s ingenuity, well, an example of a battle at the Midway Atoll, when the same mericosa commissioned a damaged aircraft carrier in 36 hours, which surprised the comrade very unpleasantly Yamamoto. Only you didn’t answer the question. If the Russian soldier is so fearless, what kind of artist, then in 41, in such quantities were surrendered? I don’t need to tell stories about fearlessness and courage, only the dead are afraid of anything. And enough for you to live in some kind of illusory world. if a person once again does not try to risk his skin and pull death for his mustache, this does not mean that he is a coward, as our RTG commander said: I don’t need the heroes of Russia here. Our task is to complete the combat mission and return home whole.
        
        dog breeder
        
        +2
        
        1 February 2018 05: 28
        
        I will answer. From your own. Father-in-law, deceased, the Kingdom, to him, heavenly, was also held captive. I got there in the first days of my stay at the front .. I won’t give up in peripitiya, it's just a fact. He ran three times. As a result of the third escape, I got to Italy. He fought in the ranks of the Resistance. He told me that much of what he did greatly surprised Italians with simplicity and result. True, there were traitors, Vlasovites, whom he refused to shoot. For which he was put to the wall, next to them. But he was just scared. And there is no need to write here that the Russians all "surrendered" prisoner. Capturing and surrendering voluntarily are much different things. Regarding the American aircraft carrier - even those who described this fact, I am sure, do not fully know all the details of this event. And the happiness of the Americans that their participation in WWII can not be compared with the share that fell to Russia. But who knows how they would surrender. And a thousand times your rtg commander is right. I do not think that the commanders of senior lieutenant Prokhorenko commanders had an opinion different from the opinion of your commander. He was also expected alive after completing the assignment. Probably, in your childhood stories about fearlessness and courage were probably told to you.
        I could discuss with you endlessly, but I will not. It was in my life that I had to step over this thin line of self-preservation, which mankind calls cowardice. And I think you have the guts to do this when you lock it.
        
        Korax71
        
        +1
        
        1 February 2018 11: 39
        
        Then what is the use of talking about diapers. When a German, Chinese, Russian, American, anybody collects his fist. Even tired of exalting his nation and obsessing with another one. But I’m just offhand, for example, I can remember Sergeant MP of the USA Carlos Hatchcock As a shell-shock in Vietnam, he managed to get 6 people out of a burning BMP and suffered severe burns. After recovering, he achieved reinstatement in service, although he was commissioned. His name was given to the training school for snipers of the city center, by the way, even the not-so-naive John Mack Kane, having all of us the opportunity to be released, refused, and was released only with all prisoners of the camp. Ribentrop's son fought as a tank commander, was on the Kursk Bulge. And as far as my personal experience is concerned, I can also give you many examples of how in a combat situation and experienced uncles were scared, but also of heroic deeds was enough.
        
        bk316
        
        +1
        
        1 February 2018 14: 12
        
        Then why this talk about diapers. When
        
        Everything is very simple to accompany everyone, but ONLY USA cries time after time You just think: it turns out that because of the Russians, their pilots have to keep concentration for 2 hours. HORROR, and so they eat whiskey and women sleep on the battlefield. Here from here and about diapers.
        
        Korax71
        
        0
        
        1 February 2018 11: 55
        
        And by the part of the participation of the same Americans in the WWII, of course they didn’t shed as much blood as the USSR, and the territory of their country was not captured. But if you look at their army at 41, then it could not be compared with the army of participants bmv. nevertheless, by the year 43 they were able to create troops that were not inferior to them. and at 44 to conduct a landing, especially if someone had studied the nuances of this operation, then calling it a walk would not work. Hitler had been waiting for them for more than a year. less than the fighters of the red army sitting knee-deep in the mud ate the stew made by them, and I don’t think that they also sucked them. it’s just that the memory of the Russian person is very selective. now it’s not beautiful to shout that we would have won. They could have won, but could not have liberated half of Europe, but could not have won. There is a fait accompli, they won not in one person, but with the help of the Allies.
  2. Cube123
    
    +6
    
    31 January 2018 07: 22
    
    Quote: tracer
    The problem is that they have orders of magnitude larger ... any.
    
    Yes, this is not a problem. They need to control the entire planet. We simply do not have such a task. What is the point of "riveting" something that you do not need?
  3. insular
    
    +3
    
    31 January 2018 07: 47
    
    Quote: tracer
    The problem is that they have orders of magnitude larger ... any.
    
    Their problem is that unfortunately, their planes are not enough for them, any to compete with the CSTO air defense and even just Russia in particular. And they know that.
  4. askort154
    
    +2
    
    31 January 2018 08: 19
    
    tracer ...... The problem is that they have orders of magnitude larger ... any.
    
    They have a problem for a long time. So, in February 1958, over the state of Georgia (USA), due to a collision of a bomber and a fighter in the air, an atomic bomb was "lost", which has not yet been found.
  5. Vladimir K.
    
    +7
    
    31 January 2018 09: 06
    
    All the same, not by orders of magnitude (do you know the meaning of the word "order" in the mathematical sense?). And then: their planes are scattered all over the world, because they consider the whole world a zone of their interests, and ours are concentrated on our territory. So, on our borders and adjacent territories, their air force has almost no advantage over ours, even taking into account the allied NATO units. By the way, (in 2013, the USA has 8200 aircraft - half of them are out of service, and the Russian Federation has 2200 - there is no difference even by one order of magnitude) link: https://aftershock.news/?q=node/363346&full
  6. Sergej1972
    
    0
    
    31 January 2018 12: 24
    
    An order of magnitude is when many times, 10-15-20 times more. In this case, the difference is several times. The difference between us and the Americans in terms of the number of planes is 2,5–3 times. Agree, this is not an order of magnitude.
4. Mar.Tirah
  
  +7
  
  31 January 2018 06: 35
  
  The American arrogance and greyhound just rolls over. I saw them the same way 30 years ago. They climb the kukan themselves, and then they accuse us of provocations.
  1. Mao
    
    +3
    
    31 January 2018 08: 22
    
    Well done! Why should they be afraid? Do you really think that they are very much afraid of the state formation of the Russian Federation, which does not have its own whole cycle of aircraft construction, which submarine missile carriers saw on needles? To such "sovereigns" who seek respect?
    1. Mar.Tirah
      
      +3
      
      31 January 2018 08: 36
      
      But in the days of the USSR. They seemed to be afraid flying along our borders, and dozens of times more often? Would they listen to Kedmi or something? They don’t need Russia. Not at all. Not strong, not weak. And I have to disappoint you, they’re still afraid .
      1. Mestny
        
        0
        
        31 January 2018 08: 59
        
        Do not feed the troll.
        
        Mao
        
        +3
        
        31 January 2018 09: 34
        
        Do you think that if someone calls the problem "Problem" - is he necessarily a "Troll"? In your opinion, is anyone critically thinking, not watching the first 5 buttons of a TV zombie, and not tolerating the existing kleptocracy regime, an enemy of the state ???
        Apparently you are a naive person
        
        Hammerlock
        
        +2
        
        31 January 2018 09: 41
        
        and don’t look at you as a “zombie creature” (proud of it, shkolota), but you’re mired, stuck in a zombopautin called the Internet. Go to the porn hub, there is your place
        
        Mao
        
        +6
        
        31 January 2018 09: 43
        
        You can’t attack a thought - attack a thinker
        
        KondratKo
        
        +1
        
        31 January 2018 11: 28
        
        You, as a great thinker, should have taken the nickname "Lao Tzu."
        All pots are scorched unintentionally or intentionally, using stamps from manuals, trying to insult, such as "state education of the Russian Federation", etc.
        If the "thinker" himself does not respect others, then you should show him the way to the forest, where he can walk, among his own kind.
        
        Mao
        
        0
        
        31 January 2018 11: 37
        
        You do not consider the Russian Federation even a public entity ???
        Hhhhh!
        You are mistaken, dear! )))
        
        KondratKo
        
        +1
        
        31 January 2018 11: 43
        
        I see stamps from manuals for trolls.
        The offer is valid ... The forest is there = >>>
      2. Mao
        
        +2
        
        31 January 2018 09: 18
        
        I agree with you, in the days of the Soviet Socialist Republic they were afraid, and respected.
        Now, apparently, they are unlikely to be afraid (otherwise they would not have allowed themselves to be impermissible), rather, they are afraid. Well, like, for example, a monkey with a grenade is afraid. At the expense of respect - there is no.
        What Kedmi said, I know. You should also know that Brzezinski used to say about the "elite" - "whose she is: yours or ours"
        Therefore, they are not afraid and do not respect, but are only a little afraid: from the monkey everything can be expected. But this is not a reason for pride.
        
        a housewife
        
        +2
        
        31 January 2018 10: 11
        
        who is this monkey? Is that you our country like that? Ah, you ... get outta here
        
        Mao
        
        +2
        
        31 January 2018 10: 31
        
        This is an allegory (a term for those who understand).
        Quote: housewife
        who is this monkey? Is that you our country like that? Ah, you ... get outta here
        
        From the training manual of the Kremlin troll: "Avoid answers to direct questions. Cling to certain words, manipulation of which harms the opponent."
        You follow her
        
        a housewife
        
        +1
        
        31 January 2018 14: 05
        
        Yeah! say "mess", do your duty. Everything is clear with you. You won’t last long. Ignoramus!
    2. sabakina
      
      +4
      
      31 January 2018 12: 44
      
      Quote: Mao
      state formation of the Russian Federation, which does not have its own whole cycle of aircraft construction,
      So you are right, we do not have aircraft.
210ox

+6

31 January 2018 06: 14

Where do you file a complaint? In "Sportloto?"
1. IGOR GORDEEV
  
  +5
  
  31 January 2018 06: 25
  
  Quote: 210ox
  Where do you file a complaint? In "Sportloto?"
  
  No. They are in the IOC (or wada - one hell) will file. Our pilots say they use dope before the flight
2. Evil543
  
  +11
  
  31 January 2018 06: 25
  
  Not in the United Nations, as Vanka Zhukov went to his grandfather’s village: “dear general secretary ..... And a meter and a half past us, and then they showed a rocket and poked us in the face with her ass”
aszzz888

+1

31 January 2018 06: 20

Well, no matter how mericatos get used to, they don’t favor them here! Because fly somewhere over the tribes, they still do not have aviation ...
Herculesic

+10

31 January 2018 06: 20

With an eye they have disgusting -there are clearly more than one and a half meters! Interestingly, their planes are also obliged to fly to the USA at a distance of fifty meters at least, otherwise one pilot can sue the other "for harassment in the workplace" ???
1. rc56
  
  +3
  
  31 January 2018 07: 26
  
  Vernyak "zero" forgot to write. So it turned out 5 instead of 50 feet ...
martin-159

+5

31 January 2018 06: 21

Was this the most dangerous moment? And where is 5 feet?
1. HEATHER
  
  +1
  
  31 January 2018 07: 37
  
  Where's 5 feet? Already under the keel .....
2. Piramidon
  
  0
  
  31 January 2018 11: 28
  
  Quote: martin-159
  Was this the most dangerous moment? And where is 5 feet?
  
  It was a “sighting” approach. When it was 5 feet, they dropped the camera.
Yngvar

+1

31 January 2018 06: 45

If scared ... Well, do not fly here! "Professionals" spruce - fires!
Vard

+3

31 January 2018 06: 48

The guy flew a shooter ... He told how they were intercepted. It was not with him, but in their units ... The fighter got into a satellite stream and fell into a tailspin ... It never came out ...
1. rc56
  
  0
  
  31 January 2018 08: 11
  
  June 26, 1980 Tu-16R accident (spacecraft 1st class military pilot, detachment commander, Major G.V. Kazakova)
  50 Guards Odrap Pacific Fleet, Dock = 7 = Karakozov Gennady Vasilyevich
  DSMU. Flight to military service.
  1 h 27 min after take-off, flying in a pair of planes at H = 200-400 m, the crew found three surface targets right at the heading at a distance of 30-35 km. After reaching the target, they were classified and photographed from nasal course angles. The host decided to re-enter the landing ship to photograph it from the traverse course angles. When performing a second approach, the follower briefly lost sight of the leader due to falling into cloud cover.
  9 seconds after photographing the landing ship from the traverse angles, the follower saw the plane leading at an altitude of 200 m in the right bank with a blaze of flame. The train stretched for 150-200 meters. No one left the plane. The slave did not observe the moment of the crash of the leader’s aircraft. Having removed burning spots on the water, he returned to the base due to a small remaining fuel. The true cause of the disaster has not been established
  
  He performed aerial reconnaissance of ships in the waters of the Sea of Japan in conjunction with Captain A.D. Schipachev. The flight was a couple at an altitude of 200-400m at a distance of 1,5 - 2km. At a point with a latitude of 38052. and a longitude of 138012. 60 targets were found (3 km north-west from Yapo Sado), they identified the first - the Japanese landing ship. Then they removed the other two (a guard and a minesweeper).
  According to another version: during aerial reconnaissance of Japanese ships in the vicinity of the Japanese island of Sado, the follower saw a bright flash in the place of the leader, then the plane without a wing went into a tailspin and fell into the sea.
  KK Major G.V. Karakozova, chief of communications of the squadron, captain Belousov Leonid Filippovich, captain V.E. Fedorov, lieutenant V.A. Chevurin, KOU warrant officer V.P. Lysenko, HRV ml. Sergeant S.V. Zavyalov, cadet S.V. Dmitriev.
  Found bodies: HQ V. Kedrova and HSS S. Dmitriev
zulusuluz

+1

31 January 2018 07: 10

It was necessary to throw a "dove" into the engine ...
tralmaster.

+1

31 January 2018 07: 10

Yes, fear has big eyes.
Chichikov

+3

31 January 2018 07: 22

Fear has big eyes! Given that the drying length is more than 20 meters, according to the survey, rapprochement is not less than 50.
HEATHER

+1

31 January 2018 07: 36

And what are they doing here? Is it not time to organize our reconnaissance flights in the area of the southern coasts of mattresses? Under cover of the Su-30s. Bash to the bash.
1. Piramidon
  
  +1
  
  31 January 2018 11: 34
  Quote: VERESK
  Isn't it time to organize our reconnaissance flights in the area of the southern coasts of mattresses?
  
  Unfortunately, the times when our Tu-95RC used Cuba airfields for this have passed.
rocket757

+1

31 January 2018 08: 09

Rendezvous point - at our borders !!! What further could be .... questions ???
Mountain shooter

0

31 January 2018 08: 19

Yes, our pilot was tired to accompany them. About 2 hours or more is something from the “five feet” area.
But the fact that Drying can easily shake a scout with a jet of engines, so that they will clutch at the tide of the cabin, is that so ...
Vladimir K.

+2

31 January 2018 08: 56

Themselves do the same with our aircraft. They want to crush psychologically, setting up scandals every time, so that our people start to be afraid of violating their "legal" right to fly wherever they want. I would also test our electronic warfare equipment on the electronics of their scouts - let their pilots have no doubt that flights along our borders are not as safe as they are told.
1. Korax71
  
  0
  
  31 January 2018 17: 14
  
  Any ship or aircraft-the territory of another country, especially in neutral waters. Such things can be regarded as an act of aggression. But now look at the whole branch of comments and figure out how many people want to bend merikos, shoot down, push off, and there are ways to offer a car. It’s a stump that Europe and the United States are worried if even the epistolary forces are already practically marching in New York and London. One should moderate the warlike rhetoric.
jovanni

0

31 January 2018 09: 01

Oh, what a meter and a half there! It was they who dreamed of fear. Normally flying, just said hello. Well, he showed rockets - all honestly ...
bogart047

0

31 January 2018 09: 50

4 seconds of the best thriller. Now it’s clear why they were so scared (no)
AndreyS

+2

31 January 2018 09: 56
On the presented frames, you can see that the distance from the Su-27 fighter of the Russian Aeronautical Spacecraft to the reconnaissance aircraft of the US Air Force is slightly more than one and a half meters.
It is interesting and where in the frames it can be seen that a meter and a half ?! I see 15-20 meters, or even more! If he flew a meter and a half, he would have closed the entire camera with the fuselage for more than one second! Its length is 21,935 meters and its wingspan is 14,698 meters.
Well, something like this should be on the screen.
1. NN52
  
  +9
  
  31 January 2018 19: 31
  
  AndreyS
  
  See the answer below.
The comment was deleted.
Mao

0

31 January 2018 12: 18

KondratKo,
Thought that could not attack - essentially nothing to answer? - switched to a person. laughing
NEXUS

+2

31 January 2018 12: 31

They fly at our borders, with the transponders turned off and complain that our fighters are brazenly intercepting them. I want to ask the mattresses of the military, have you fallen from Mars?
The poor man

0

31 January 2018 15: 01

Well, why are you sober?
NN52

+10

31 January 2018 16: 32

Pilot well done !!!! It’s risky, of course .. the speed is about 500 .. The distance is about 30-40 m.
The camera is worth the hike in the fuselage, so you need to take into account the wingspan of a scout ...
Therefore, the real distance to the wing was small, at which ours passed
So they began to cry ,,,, and change diapers ...
Terenin

+6

1 February 2018 14: 06

... ER-3 was forced to fly through the jet stream of the Su-27. Russian VKS offer NATO pilots various healing types of jets: for beauty - satellite, for massage - turbulent, for brain cleansing - reactive, and for removing food debris in the mouth - this is for you at the pharmacy!
Alexey Mazurov

0

1 February 2018 14: 27

as a result of which the EP-3 was forced to fly through the jet stream of the Su-27

next time the jet will not only be "reactive"
Mao

0

8 February 2018 13: 59

Quote: KondratKo
I see stamps from manuals for trolls.
The offer is valid ... The forest is there = >>>

So you are familiar with the "Troll Manuals"
It’s useful to know them, dear, not only to the “attacker”, but also to the “attacker”.
And to the forest - you have a direct road