Military Review

What is now the most important thing in world politics

21
The modern world is on the verge of a nuclear catastrophe. Issues of an arms race are excitedly discussed in the media: who has accumulated more nuclear warheads, who can be the first to start a nuclear massacre, who has more powerful bombs, etc. Moreover, the discussion is usually conducted almost at the household level, which is clearly not conducive to solving the problem under discussion. It seems that the participants in this discussion, if I may say so, are very far from a scientific, competent, professional approach to solving this problem.


We propose to apply a rigorous scientific approach to solving the problem under discussion, which, it seems to us, is the most significant for all mankind. How can this thesis be explained to all participants in the discussion, in order to proceed to its competent resolution?

To do this, we propose to apply the latest scientific results, which, to date, are beginning to receive international recognition. Here we are talking about the concept of the substrate approach, which is based on the ideas of achieving a systemic effect. Unfortunately, this theory is poorly understood by contemporaries, since it is developed at the level of philosophical knowledge and is accepted by readers as something exotic, divorced from life. To overcome this contradiction we will try in a popular form, unobtrusively explaining to readers some key points of this theory.

So, we are talking about the possibility of applying high science in solving the burning question of the existence of life on Earth.

The first concept of our "training course" is proposed to use the highly scientific term "abstraction". If you take any reference book on this issue, you will get a hard to understand definition that abstraction is a way of thinking in solving any problems, which is always based on highlighting the main thing. But at the same time questions arise:
1. What is the main thing and how to identify it?
2. How to classify the main thing in a complex problem?
3. How to identify the most important to solve our problem?

For interested readers, we can give a detailed answer to these questions in relation to solving the problem of preventing nuclear war. The fact is that the author managed to solve the described problem by developing a new scientific direction, which is called the substrate approach. For those who are deeply interested in this issue, we advise you to type in the Internet search engine the words "substrate approach, management optimization". To identify any major in the substrate approach, a special epistemological scheme has been developed (see the Internet search engine). Gnoseology is the science of knowledge. Thus, it turns out that the problem of identifying the main thing is always connected with the solution of questions of knowledge and understanding of certain informational contexts, classes of tasks, similar problems, etc. The epistemological scheme makes a kind of revolution in the theory of knowledge. For example, instead of the obscure abstraction, it introduces as many as five hierarchical ones, i.e. subordinate levels of analysis of the problem. Moreover, the movement on these levels of abstraction is carried out not at random, but strictly according to a certain algorithm, which consists in the fact that we first consider the problem as if at the household level, i.e. at the level of practice and only then we formulate the most important problem - to get a systemic effect, to connect the elements of the object under consideration so that, unexpectedly for us and for everyone around, this system has new properties. It’s just here that it turns out that the main global problem is not how to make a bomb extremely powerful, but how to stop the arms race once and for all and put our leaders in such a framework so that they don’t accidentally or by reason of mental illness pressed this ill-fated nuclear button.

A detailed algorithm for solving this problem was obtained by the author in the form of a computer model. The only, as it seems to the author, major disadvantage of this approach is the need to possess the participants of such a simulation with some special knowledge and a special way of thinking, which is called substrate reflection.

But we will discuss this in the next article of our series.
Author:
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 210ox
    210ox 1 February 2018 06: 08 New
    +1
    As soon as I read about “Gnoseology is the science of knowledge.” Immediately everything fell into place .....
    1. dSK
      dSK 1 February 2018 08: 27 New
      0
      Hello Dmitry!
      Quote: 210ox
      As soon as I read
      "Good News" - everything fell into place at once ... The Way "individual salvation". hi
  2. andrewkor
    andrewkor 1 February 2018 06: 10 New
    +1
    Well, I’m directly intrigued, a plaque, a fly! Apply it to the housing and communal services problem!
  3. Same lech
    Same lech 1 February 2018 06: 12 New
    0
    "substrate approach, management optimization."


    Mdja ... what mental sex or something to do.
    A scientific dictionary is certainly good ... but I have to live on sinful earth in an environment of daily bread production and not be guided by abstruse theories and words ...
    Simply put, the only thought is whether I can make it to the metro if the Minitmenn with a 100 kt charge starts to fall on a well-known object 40 km from my city.
    1. Fedor egoist
      Fedor egoist 1 February 2018 14: 50 New
      +1
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      will I have time to get to the metro if the Minitmenn with a 100 ct charge starts to fall on a famous object 40 km from my city

      What for? At this distance, it’s enough just not to look in that direction. 100ct at a distance of 40km gentle warm breeze only ruffled hair :)
      If a spare Minuteman with a similar gift arrives directly in the city itself, no metro will help. IMHO, the available half an hour or less is worth spending either on the maximum distance from the proposed epicenter, or (due to the impossibility of implementing the first option) to drive your body into the deepest basement within walking distance. Preferably in the basement of the nearest supermarket. Nobody will be there - everyone will run in the subway :) With a certain amount of luck (did not evaporate, did not burn, did not fill up) and after a while we realize the first option - removal from the epicenter of the explosion.
  4. tasha
    tasha 1 February 2018 06: 25 New
    +1
    "Can anyone speak Japanese characters?" wink

    If any theory cannot be explained with simple and logical examples, then something is wrong with this theory.

    the main global problem is not how to make the bomb extremely powerful,

    And I read articles on the Internet and write all the time: "Let's make an extremely powerful bomb, let's do ..."

    and how, in general, to stop the arms race once and for all

    What weapons are we talking about?

    and put our leaders in such a framework so that they do not accidentally or due to a mental illness press this ill-fated nuclear button.

    First you need to limit the number of leaders who can click on the button. The whole world is doing this.

    If you read this comment of mine and didn’t understand something in it, it’s because the deep meaning of my suggestions is not accessible to everyone. Grow and re-read ... wink
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 1 February 2018 06: 42 New
      +1
      First you need to limit the number of leaders who can click on the button. The whole world is doing this.


      belay Seriously ... but in my opinion, on the contrary ... supporting the policy of US hegemony this world contributes to the opposite.

      The assassination of Gaddafi ... the assassination of Hussein ... the assassination of Milosevic did nothing to limit the willingness to have a life-saving button.
      The main danger to the existence of life on earth is the desire of a small handful of perverts to establish their power on our planet.
      1. tasha
        tasha 1 February 2018 06: 54 New
        0
        Killing those who want the coveted button is also a non-proliferation method. Not as effective as, for example, an algorithm developed on the basis of a substrate approach that is not clear to everyone, but still .. wink
        In between workdays, I suggest you master the modern scientific methods of management optimization with the sensitive guidance of prof. A.A. Rumyantsev. Then how are you lucky or where are you going ... This is not for you males, males. Epistemology wink
  5. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 1 February 2018 06: 36 New
    +2
    Here it is science laughing ... He knows how to hide behind a pile of obscure words and veiled meanings, so much so that nothing is clear. In mathematics, on the contrary, complex ones are reduced to easy-to-understand problem solving winked
    And then, as in that proverb - make a fool pray to God, so he will break his forehead. So scientists are worthless to talk about simple things. No.
    1. esaul
      esaul 1 February 2018 07: 20 New
      +2
      Quote: Rurikovich
      He knows how to hide behind a pile of incomprehensible words and veiled meanings, so much so that nothing is clear

      As one acquaintance says in such cases: "Vo-in! I’m saying that he has syphilis!" belay
  6. Square
    Square 1 February 2018 06: 50 New
    0
    What is now the most important thing in world politics

    Yes, if only I knew ...
  7. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 1 February 2018 08: 50 New
    0
    "Ostap carried ...." "Gnoseological roots" and all that ... laughing
  8. prodi
    prodi 1 February 2018 09: 00 New
    0
    To “beat” as a trump card all tendencies towards the third world war is possible only by religion (science and knowledge are too esoteric by default). Which one?
  9. Antares
    Antares 1 February 2018 11: 53 New
    0
    that the main global problem is not how to make the bomb extremely powerful, but how to stop the arms race once and for all and put our leaders in such a framework that they do not accidentally or due to mental illness press this ill-fated nuclear button.

    the author proposes to change the animal nature of man by some sort of prohibitions, morality (and artificial, because we do not have the inherent morality of predators) to stop the progress of systems of competing, etc., etc.
    That is, to change all of humanity! He is not aware that human beasts always defeat our mind almost, and the mind can only look for an excuse.
    Tough intraspecific competition of human systems and societies. The species has almost no external enemies (we successfully eliminated them and zenocide). They take away diseases less than we give birth (in general), and here we compete within the species.
    So the arms race (economic and social) is a kind of intraspecific competition and evolution. Take away this element (hypothetically) and humanity will stop. Stop is the death of civilization.
  10. Petr1968
    Petr1968 1 February 2018 12: 30 New
    0
    The author got a good article, for a long time there were no such ones at VO. Everything is clear and painted on the case .. A lot has become clear!
    1. Rumancev
      1 November 2018 07: 12 New
      0
      Peter! Thank! Your comment is the only positive!
  11. Dashing
    Dashing 1 February 2018 13: 25 New
    0
    “What is the most important thing in world politics now” is for Russia to stay away from it and tackle internal issues.
  12. 75 hammer
    75 hammer 1 February 2018 14: 16 New
    0
    And if you delete the words: “Nuclear Weapons” from the article, then what does this article have to do with “MILITARY REVIEW”? I understand the elections are coming soon, and you have to make good money on this, but ........ and there is no further words!
  13. flicker
    flicker 1 February 2018 22: 03 New
    +2
    What is now the most important thing in world politics

    Either the title does not match the text, or the text does not justify the title what
  14. gladcu2
    gladcu2 1 February 2018 22: 46 New
    0
    How far are you from the people ...

    Can we talk in Russian? Or do you have enough knowledge? Then why climb with your advice.

    The economic macro-system needs to be changed.
  15. Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 3 February 2018 09: 37 New
    0
    Delirium and complete plagiarism. I have known about systemic thinking as a way of knowing the world for more than 20 years. I don’t remember where the legs grow from, but the author of this article has no idea.