Military Review

KnAAZ talked about plans for the current year

36
Deputy Director for Development and Regional Policy, Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aviation Plant Yu.A. Gagarin (KnAAZ) Sergey Bocharov spoke about the work results and plans of the company for 2017 achieved in 2018 year. The agency reports Khabarovsk region today.




Last year KnAAZ handed over to the Russian military ten Su-35 and four Su-27CM, which were modernized.

This year, the implementation of the state defense order and the provision of equipment for the Russian HVAC will continue. In the coming year, we must put in the Ministry of Defense ten Su-35 and six modernized Su-27CM. According to the PAK FA program in 2017, we completed the production of flight samples of the T-50 of the second stage, handed over three machines to the customer for testing, preparing for the production of the installation batch. The program is extremely important and promising for us
Bocharov said in Khabarovsk at the board at the Ministry of Industry and Transport.

In addition, according to him, in 2017, "in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, ten Su-35s were made and handed over to the People's Republic of China, and in 2018, the neighboring country should receive a final batch of ten of the same machines."

Rosoboronexport along with Sukhoi and UAC continue to work with customers, and, according to Bocharov, the plant will soon receive another major foreign contract.

In 2017, 30 Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft kits were manufactured; in 2018, the release of the same batch is planned. Gross production in 2017 amounted to 60,3 billion rubles, of which the vast majority is the share of the military aviation technicians. The enterprise has undergone a deep reconstruction and modernization; at present, KnAAZ is working with the KLA on the issue of reloading the machining production under the programs MS-21, Tu-160 and Tu-214,
told the deputy director.
Photos used:
KnAAZ
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dreamboat
    Dreamboat 30 January 2018 15: 12
    +9
    Well done! While the loafers are screaming that everything is gone, business people are building modern planes. I would like more, of course, but this is good. We are waiting for the T-50 in the series.
    1. oldseaman1957
      oldseaman1957 30 January 2018 15: 20
      +1
      Quote: Dreamboat
      I would like more
      The only negative is that it is close to China, and the “factory” is crucial!
    2. Nasrat
      Nasrat 30 January 2018 15: 38
      12
      Quote: Dreamboat
      While the loafers are screaming that everything is gone, business people are building modern planes.

      some build ships and pl, and someone just bakes bread ... and they are the same business people ... who then are loafers? AND?



    3. seti
      seti 30 January 2018 15: 57
      +3
      One thing can be said - this is one of the most important factories in Russia.
      If I understand correctly, in a year is the plant capable of producing up to 20 Su-35? Not bad. It’s a pity that only half are going to the Chinese.
      1. vlad66
        vlad66 30 January 2018 16: 32
        +8
        Quote: seti
        One thing can be said - this is one of the most important factories in Russia.
        If I understand correctly, in a year is the plant capable of producing up to 20 Su-35? Not bad. It’s a pity that only half are going to the Chinese.

        It’s a pity of course, it would be better in the native VKS, but for the VKS, to build a batch of aircraft, you need money hi
        1. New
          New 30 January 2018 16: 53
          +3
          Quote: vlad66
          that would build a batch of aircraft need money
          There is money, there is no desire.
          1. Nick
            Nick 30 January 2018 23: 28
            0
            Quote: New
            Quote: vlad66
            that would build a batch of aircraft need money
            There is money, there is no desire.

            But there is no need. It is necessary to work according to plan, and not as the left leg wants.
    4. zyablik.olga
      zyablik.olga 31 January 2018 04: 33
      +3
      Quote: Dreamboat
      Well done! While idlers shout that everything is gone, business people are building modern aircraft. I would like more, of course, but this is good.

      I do not know what the "loafers" shout there, but why not say anything about the level of wages at the aviation plant in Komsomolsk? About how many people because of the harsh climatic conditions, the high cost of living and the lack of well-being leave the “city of presidential attention” annually. sad
      1. Nick
        Nick 31 January 2018 10: 19
        0
        Quote: zyablik.olga
        why nothing is said about the level of wages at the aircraft factory in Komsomolsk? About how many residents, due to severe climatic conditions, high cost and lack of amenities, annually leave the “city of presidential attention”.

        Well so, share the data, open a subject that on in more detail as that. Salary data, how much is leaving, how much is coming. Give information to thinking. fellow
        1. zyablik.olga
          zyablik.olga 1 February 2018 15: 19
          +2
          Quote: Nick
          Well so, share the data, open a subject that on in more detail as that. Salary data, how much is leaving, how much is coming. Give information to thinking.

          Please, this is written by me a few years ago. Besides the salary, there is little that has changed. The hard workers on the assembly get their hands on a maximum of 35 TR, subject to overtime.

          https://topwar.ru/37571-komsomolskiy-na-amure-avi
          acionnyy-zavod-imeni-yu-a-gagarina.html

          https://topwar.ru/35658-komsomolsk-na-amure-vzgly
          ad-iznutri.html
          1. Nick
            Nick 6 February 2018 19: 19
            0
            Quote: zyablik.olga
            Workers in the assembly get on hand a maximum of 35 TR, subject to overtime.

            Well, not comme il faut of course, but the salary is still substantial. For example, I live in Central Russia in 120 km from MKAD. Highly skilled workers receive a maximum of 25 tr Of course, there are 30 thousands of clean ones, but this is an exception to the rule. A relative in my Moscow is dangling to work, to the security service of the business center, earning 30 thousand by hand, but this is for 210 hours a month. Despite the fact that he has a law degree and several years of work in the police with the rank of major
            1. zyablik.olga
              zyablik.olga 7 February 2018 14: 48
              +1
              Quote: Nick
              Well, not comme il faut of course, but the salary is still substantial.

              For the area where half the winter?
              Quote: Nick
              I, for example, live in Central Russia in 120 km from Moscow Ring Road.

              And I live in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, where in winter is usually -30, with wind and 70% humidity. It is impossible to get used to it! Do you want to visit us in December and February? Yes, and compared at the same time prices in stores and gas stations.
  2. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 30 January 2018 15: 18
    +2
    214 still alive?
    1. seti
      seti 30 January 2018 16: 01
      +6
      Is alive. But they are collected very few and by special order. Basically, like Tu-214PU (control center), Tu-214СР (repeater aircraft), Tu-214СУС (airplane-communications center) - aircraft for the Presidential Administration, equipped with special communications [66], reconnaissance aircraft Tu-214Р as well as Tu-214ON (“Open Sky”) - an aircraft with a digital aerial complex, a side-scan radar with a synthesized aperture, infrared and television equipment is designed to perform observation flights under the Open Skies Treaty.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  3. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 30 January 2018 15: 43
    +2
    10 + 10 = 20 Su-35 per year.
    Almost two a month. Not bad.
  4. NEXUS
    NEXUS 30 January 2018 15: 54
    +5
    and in 2018, the neighboring country should receive a batch of ten of the same vehicles ending the contract ”

    SU-35С need not be bought a dozen a year, but on 20-30 vehicles, updating the fleet of heavy fighters faster. SU-57 will become a fully operational unit only in years through 5-10, and until that time, the 35-th is the main heavy IFI of our aerospace forces.
    1. Genry
      Genry 30 January 2018 16: 26
      +1
      Quote: NEXUS
      Only in 57-5 years, the SU-10 will become a fully operational unit, and until that time, the 35th is the main heavy IFI of our VKS.

      These are airplanes for various purposes. One for open confrontation, the second for covert actions. In the "dog landfill" the invisibility is not needed, then in the composite it is bad to patch holes.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 30 January 2018 16: 42
        +9
        Quote: Genry
        These are airplanes for various purposes.

        Seriously? Directly different?
        Quote: Genry
        In the "dog landfill" the invisibility is not needed, then in the composite it is bad to patch holes.

        Well, apparently, the developers did not hear about your opinion, and therefore the SU-57, as a fighter for gaining dominance in the air (like the SU-35), also received super maneuverability.
        1. Genry
          Genry 30 January 2018 19: 52
          0
          Quote: NEXUS
          Well, apparently, the developers did not hear about your opinion, and therefore the SU-57, as a fighter for gaining dominance in the air (like the SU-35), also received super maneuverability.

          The developers did the right thing with over-maneuverability. But this is not necessary in order to get into the landfill, but to get out of it.
    2. seti
      seti 30 January 2018 17: 09
      0
      Quote: NEXUS
      and in 2018, the neighboring country should receive a batch of ten of the same vehicles ending the contract ”

      SU-35С need not be bought a dozen a year, but on 20-30 vehicles, updating the fleet of heavy fighters faster. SU-57 will become a fully operational unit only in years through 5-10, and until that time, the 35-th is the main heavy IFI of our aerospace forces.


      Where do we get pilots of this level? We need two pilots per plane or even three ideally, and we will soon have the opposite. Although it seems that they write progress, there is a growing number of cadets. Yes, and it’s probably not worth it now. We produce not only Su-35С but also other aircraft. My opinion was probably in vain pushed by Su-35 to China - it’s more necessary for itself. When there will be more than one hundred another thing and half to sell? It's too early.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 30 January 2018 17: 19
        +4
        Quote: seti
        Where do we get pilots of this level?

        And where are we recruiting pilots for the SU-30SM? In this case, it is now necessary to train pilots under the SU-57. And many nodes and systems in the 35th are the same as in the 57th.
        Quote: seti
        When there will be more than one hundred another thing and half to sell? It's too early.

        Ideally, there should be 250-300 sides.
        1. Herman 4223
          Herman 4223 30 January 2018 17: 49
          +1
          Why, then, what year should they be released before the 30th? It should gradually be replaced in production by the 57th. Godikov should not be in production in five years. It’s necessary to launch a light fighter in a series, the SU-35 and hundreds will be enough, but three hundred and four light lungs would not hurt
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 30 January 2018 17: 55
            +2
            Quote: Herman 4223
            Why, then, what year should they be released before the 30th?

            The ratio of the destructive pair is about one heavy load, two or three light fighters (now, these are medium fighters, so to speak). MIG-35 from this or next year will go into series. And part of the tasks that the SU-30 and SU-35 are now solving will be taken over by the MIG-35.
            Quote: Herman 4223
            SU-35 and hundreds will be enough, but three hundred and four light lungs, it would not hurt

            And with the SU-27 park, which has been in service since the time of the union, what are you going to do? They also need to be replaced with either the SU-30 or the SU-35. At the same time, about 200 MIG-29s must also be changed to MIG-35s.
    3. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 30 January 2018 17: 46
      0
      It is necessary to bring the Su-30SM to the level of the Su-35S (make it a double version) and make the most unified aircraft.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 30 January 2018 17: 50
        +3
        Quote: Zaurbek
        It is necessary to bring the Su-30SM to the level of the Su-35S (make it a double version) and make the most unified aircraft.

        No need ... The Su-35 is quite a good heavy fighter and for 10 years it will be equal in number to the SU-30-m in our airborne forces. At the same time, the SU-30, I think, is gradually being redesigned only for export.
        The line of heavy MFIs is greatly extended, and therefore, it will be shortened taking into account deliveries to the Sukhoi Aviation Institute SU-57, well, and MIG-35.
        1. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 30 January 2018 17: 53
          +1
          The Su-35 is the newest version of the 27th ... The Su-30SM is worse in terms of both engines and radar and glider. And in the future, it can replace the Su-34 (when they finish hanging containers, finally). Therefore (if there are plans for a further 30x release), you need to unify it with a maximum of 35m and 57m (for engines and avionics)
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 30 January 2018 18: 00
            +4
            Quote: Zaurbek
            Su-35 is the newest version of the 27th

            Although the 35th is a continuation of the 27th, but this is essentially a completely new machine, not only in avionics, but also the glider has been changed. And here it’s quite reasonable to talk about a new plane.
            Quote: Zaurbek
            Su-30SM is worse in terms of engines and radar and glider. And in the future it can replace the Su-34

            What stupid thing? The Su-34 is a completely different car. It has more bomber and attack aircraft than a fighter. And the SU-30 is sharpened more for its destructive functions. Completely different machines with tasks and functionality.
            1. Zaurbek
              Zaurbek 31 January 2018 08: 02
              0
              The presence of an aiming container will equalize these functions and we will get a single plane for both air targets and ground targets ... for example, take the Su-30MKI
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 31 January 2018 11: 06
                +2
                Quote: Zaurbek
                The presence of an aiming container will equalize these functions and we will get a single plane for both air targets and ground targets ... for example, take the Su-30MKI

                Do not try to cram the SU-34 in comparison with the SU-30, it is slow, and for a good fighter it does not have that super maneuverability like the 30th.
                1. Zaurbek
                  Zaurbek 31 January 2018 15: 42
                  0
                  And why is it needed? I say, the Su-30SM will pull in all the tasks ... this will give flexibility to our Air Force .... For example, Syria: A fleet of Su-30SM would be enough instead of Su-24/34/30/35 ..... And the strike force is large and large for air defense tasks ...
        2. seti
          seti 30 January 2018 18: 31
          +1
          Ideally, leave for yourself the Su-35С, Su-34, Su-57 and MiG-35. And little by little to refuse. And then too much at random. Maybe they are largely unified, but all one is too many different types of aircraft. These are both pilots to retrain and technicians.
    4. Nick
      Nick 30 January 2018 23: 42
      0
      Quote: NEXUS
      SU-35С need not be bought a dozen a year, but on 20-30 vehicles, updating the fleet of heavy fighters faster

      You forgot that the Su-27 is being upgraded to the CM3 level, and the IAZ is also producing Su-30 for our Air Force
  5. APASUS
    APASUS 30 January 2018 19: 23
    +1
    It's time to move to upgrading the Su-27, Su-30 at least partially to the level of the Su-35
    1. zyablik.olga
      zyablik.olga 31 January 2018 04: 36
      +3
      Quote: APASUS
      It's time to move to upgrading the Su-27, Su-30 at least partially to the level of the Su-35

      Most of the available Su-27P is close to the end of its life cycle due to the development of a glider resource. Apparently, this year the upgrade of the Su-27P to the level of the Su-27MX3 is complete, so simply there is nothing to upgrade.
  6. Lone gunman
    Lone gunman 30 January 2018 21: 14
    0
    aah ... 2 planes a week is weak or, in extreme cases, 1 a week))), and this suggests that we do not have “pilots” who would not say anything ... there is no money ... and generally poor infrastructure ... but "riveting" is not a problem. "Maidai! Mayday! Mayday! " - it seems we have a problem ... "Something went wrong."
  7. andrey-ivanov
    andrey-ivanov 1 February 2018 10: 51
    +1
    10 Su-35 and 6 Su-27SM! 16 cars per year for the whole country! AHRACHEN SIMPLY !!!