Military Review

What threatens Washington fall in the dollar

84
Experts believe that the fall in the dollar in the future threatens the global economic domination of the United States.




While the dollar has not come down from the pedestal: it remains the most significant key currency in the world. And yet he is weakening, analysts write “Manager Magazin”. Yes, US officials claim that weakening the dollar will benefit domestic exports, but in the long run, weakening the home currency will undermine confidence not only in the US creditworthiness, but also in the entire American economy. Mr Trump and his associates in the White House may lose the economic benefits that the States still enjoy, notes "InoTV".

As Henrik Muller believes, the situation is changing before our eyes: the dollar is falling rapidly. Since Trump took office, the US dollar has lost 18% against the euro. And what is the White House doing? The Trump administration is reacting to the decline in the national currency rate “recklessly and contradictory,” the analyst believes. The US Treasury Secretary agreed that a weak dollar was in Washington’s interests. It is very strange: after all, until now the US government has certainly insisted on a strong dollar: the status of the key currency depends on such!

Chaos and confusion was added by Trump himself. He suddenly refuted the cheerful statement of his own minister and informed the public that he wanted to see a "strong dollar." Moreover, Trump suddenly declared that the dollar ... is growing stronger.

Henrik Muller considers such statements by the American president "fake the news", Because you need to" take into account real data. "

The political hype around all these events is adventurous, the columnist believes. It is accepted that the governments of the states do not participate in the questions of the change in the exchange rate: the statements of the leaders may sow panic. In addition, the endless currency fluctuations are a bane for the economy.

Muller recalls 1930's. In those days, the economies of large states waged a trade war. Result: disaster, the Great Depression. Then the United States managed to create a relatively reliable international system of currency regulation. Trade conflicts have been resolved since then under the General Agreement on Customs Tariffs and Trade (later via the WTO).

The current United States, we add, is ruled by an upstart, which does not understand at all in the international monetary system and its regulation. All his decisions are built more on nationalism, that is, on an extremely narrow vision of all situations. What is being done is that in the short term (during the Trump years) it can be beneficial to America. In the future, these trampy do not look: do not know how. As a result, Mr. President’s financiers are in favor of a weak dollar and pursue a real policy in this direction, and Trump broadcasts another lie on the air, designed not to calm the world, or to excite (it’s tricky to understand).

In the near future, the United States is likely to gain from tramponomics, but in the medium term, and even more so in the long run, will lose.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Anarchist
    Anarchist 30 January 2018 07: 24
    +9
    What now will happen to the dollar - the "golden calf"? Who will be worshiped? This will be a break in the patterns of the liberal masses!
    1. Cube123
      Cube123 30 January 2018 07: 36
      +8
      Quote: Anarchist
      What now will happen to the dollar - the "golden calf"? Who will be worshiped? This will be a break in the patterns of the liberal masses!

      Oh come on you. They have already collapsed the dollar. From 2001 to 2013, the dollar depreciated at eight in relation to gold! time. From $ 250 to nearly $ 2000 per troy ounce. http://goldomania.ru/menu_003_003.html
      Apparently, it's time to repeat wassat
      1. AnpeL
        AnpeL 30 January 2018 09: 14
        +3
        Trump promised that he would transfer all the production of American companies with large industrial areas beyond their mound (especially in Southeast Asia) back to the state. and for a producer of goods that are in demand for export (without a doubt here), of course, reducing the value of their currency will be beneficial at first, but the subsequent macroeconomic consequences will hurt such organizations in one way or another.
        1. Nikolai Grek
          Nikolai Grek 31 January 2018 18: 51
          0
          Quote: AnpeL
          Trump promised that he would transfer all the production of American companies with large industrial areas beyond their mound (especially in Southeast Asia) back to the state. and for a producer of goods that are in demand for export (without a doubt here), of course, reducing the value of their currency will be beneficial at first, but the subsequent macroeconomic consequences will hurt such organizations in one way or another.

          let "bring" the standard of living to Chinese and can safely return production back !!! wassat wassat wassat it’s not clear who the Americans will be on the world stage then !!! wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing
      2. NEXUS
        NEXUS 30 January 2018 14: 47
        +4
        Quote: Cube123
        Oh come on you. They have already collapsed the dollar.

        That is, in the coming years there will be, if not a big war, with the participation of many states, then certainly the war is not small enough ... and this can be seen in the large-scale armament of the European armies, any formations such as ISIS and the arms race in general. The mattresses need war and as much as possible. The same great depression stupidly ate WWII in due time ...
        1. Cube123
          Cube123 30 January 2018 15: 24
          +4
          Quote: NEXUS
          That is, in the coming years there will be, if not a big war, with the participation of many states, then certainly the war is not small enough ...

          If they had found those who wanted to "carry chestnuts out of the fire for them," the war would have already begun. I think that so far they will try to solve their problems by inventing new methods, such as cryptocurrencies.
          And with regard to the war, I received great pleasure here from the new book by N. Starikov, "War. By Alien Hands." From there an English proverb: "Why bark yourself when the dog is there?" laughing
          1. Antianglosax
            Antianglosax 31 January 2018 18: 47
            0
            Quote: Cube123
            while they try to solve their problems by inventing new methods, such as cryptocurrencies.

            While the Americans are trying hard to blow up the whole World’s brain, sow confusion, somewhere panic and set fire, set fire to everything that can be set on fire without consequences for them. Therefore, they carry a "blizzard". They are pulling time before the congressional elections. After the election, inevitably consolidate, and then we will not have a sweet time, given the fact that he sits in our Kremlin and around.
    2. 210ox
      210ox 30 January 2018 07: 47
      +3
      Alexander, good morning .. Here damn it .. We have our own currency, the ruble. Through the efforts of the gentlemen of the liberals, he is deadly screwed to this buck. That's what they will have here, only stronger.
      Quote: Anarchist
      What now will happen to the dollar - the "golden calf"? Who will be worshiped? This will be a break in the patterns of the liberal masses!
      1. Andrey K
        Andrey K 30 January 2018 08: 03
        16
        Quote: 210ox
        ... We have our own ruble currency ...

        Here is what your phrase inspired:

        That was the currency !!!
        All this western husk flew instantly and former enemies lined up to do business with Russia !!!
        1. raw174
          raw174 30 January 2018 08: 42
          +6
          Quote: Andrey K
          That was the currency !!!

          which has grown into the Soviet ruble ... It is likewise dependent on energy exports ... As soon as the price of oil fell (the 80s), external debt flew up, income went down, and you know where the union is in history ...
          You can stamp gold coins and they will carry weight, but you can’t boost the economy on them, well, only from the level of a wild banana country, to a civilized agrarian ...
          1. Andrey K
            Andrey K 30 January 2018 09: 12
            +7
            raw174
            ... You can stamp gold coins and they will carry weight, but they can’t boost the economy ...

            In something you are right ...
            The economy is not raised by gold, silver or oil. She is raised by people. And if our ruble is tied to oil, then these people, our "managers", the business elite, their mother and their children, do not have the desire to untie it.
            And the gold darling is still not a green candy wrapper.
            1. raw174
              raw174 30 January 2018 09: 16
              +5
              Quote: Andrey K
              And the gold dime is still not an imposed green candy wrapper.

              This currency is the same as beads or shells. In fact, it is not the form and the material that is important, but what interests the currency protects and who puts it into circulation, whether these are influential people ... I think so.
              1. Andrey K
                Andrey K 30 January 2018 09: 22
                +6
                Quote: raw174
                ... This is the same currency as beads or shells ...

                Absolutely correctly consider.
          2. Alex Nevs
            Alex Nevs 30 January 2018 09: 27
            0
            I do not agree .. Temporary screening of "soap bubbles" will occur, with a redistribution of emphasis, BUT !!! temporary, which will very much help to raise the economy. EXAMPLE: sanctions - “redistributed” to raise the economy of that country (agricultural, defense .....), on which these sanctions were imposed (temporarily of course). and so on
            1. raw174
              raw174 30 January 2018 10: 00
              +1
              Quote: Alex Nevs
              I do not agree .. Temporary screening of "soap bubbles" will occur, with a redistribution of emphasis, BUT !!!

              I don’t understand what exactly do you disagree with?
          3. Nikolai Grek
            Nikolai Grek 31 January 2018 18: 52
            0
            Quote: raw174
            Quote: Andrey K
            That was the currency !!!

            which has grown into the Soviet ruble ... It is likewise dependent on energy exports ... As soon as the price of oil fell (the 80s), external debt flew up, income went down, and you know where the union is in history ...
            You can stamp gold coins and they will carry weight, but you can’t boost the economy on them, well, only from the level of a wild banana country, to a civilized agrarian ...

            labeled type is not at work ??? what what wassat wassat
            1. raw174
              raw174 1 February 2018 06: 18
              +1
              Quote: Nikolai the Greek
              labeled type is not at work ???

              Management made erroneous decisions, apparently hoping that ideology would replace bread. The country was not ready for such an outside influence, this is the fault of the leadership. Because now they are creating stabilization funds, taking into account the lessons of the past.
              1. Nikolai Grek
                Nikolai Grek 1 February 2018 19: 08
                0
                Quote: raw174
                Management made erroneous decisions

                not erroneous, but criminal .... moreover, geopolitical !!! request request
        2. your1970
          your1970 30 January 2018 09: 12
          +2
          Quote: Andrey K
          That was the currency !!!
          - there was no currency — no one took it. Since the RSFSR was not recognized, respectively, and banknotes did not go abroad. Because of this, they were forced to get old royal stamps and mint royal chervonets from the Soviet ones (which is why royal chervonets are valued for several certain years numismatists solely by weight of gold + 10-15%, and Soviet chervonets because of the destroyed circulation is expensive). Because of this, they were forced to pay with the cultural values ​​and values ​​of Gokhran.
          Quote: Andrey K
          All this western husk flew instantly and former enemies lined up to do business with Russia !!!
          - It wouldn’t be possible to line up yet, when real pennies could be paid for paintings of 17th century Holland / diamond jewelry / Faberge products / antiques.

          There was an incidental situation, too - due to a lack of understanding of banking matters. In Siberia, city baths were heated for 3 months with government securities. A foreign businessman saw this, and upon returning to Paris, asked a friend of the banker - would he accept these papers and at what rate? He answered that he would accept about 80% of the nominal value. According to the most conservative estimates, the papers were burned in that bath 62 billion rubles in gold
          1. Alex Nevs
            Alex Nevs 30 January 2018 09: 30
            0
            there in the BANK of the country a job was arranged: godfather, brother, matchmaker, mother-in-law :-), ... he was a complete stupid in banking :-)
          2. Andrey K
            Andrey K 30 January 2018 09: 39
            13
            your1970
            ... there was no currency, nobody took it ...
            ... Because of this, they were forced to get the old royal stamps and mint the royal chervonets from the Soviet ...
            ... Because of this, they were forced to pay the cultural values ​​and values ​​of Gokhran ...

            You told me such news wassat
            I have been engaged in numismatics for more than 40 years and for the first time I heard that no one took the Soviet chervonets belay
            What the...
            You put everything upside down.
            1. Soviet gold chervonets was produced in 1923-1925, naturally on the basis of imperial stamps.
            2. Nobody ever destroyed the “circulations” of the gold dime, for one simple reason - they were issued for only two years and sold in bank bins, well, our people stocked up in stockings and socks.
            3. For external calculations, the USSR was forced to resume minting of gold coins in 1975 and continued to do so until 1982.
            And last, something you and flies and cutlets in a bunch. What does the sale of cultural property have to do with it? Yes, she was just barbaric - objects of art, church utensils drove west by echelons ... But this has nothing to do with the circulation of the gold dime. These things were taken out for nothing in exchange for food, which our "Western partners" took full advantage of. They stupidly robbed the country ...
            Everything else is lyrics ...
            1. Barmal
              Barmal 30 January 2018 09: 48
              +3
              Most of the funds were exported for industrialization. Without which we would be pulverized.
              1. Andrey K
                Andrey K 30 January 2018 09: 50
                +6
                Quote: Barmal
                ... Most of the money was taken out for industrialization. Without which we would be rolled into powder ...

                I agree.
            2. your1970
              your1970 30 January 2018 13: 15
              0
              that is, as a numismatist with 40 years of experience, you agree - that in Soviet times, heaped a bunch of royal royal chervontsy-
              “The thing is that these chervonets were minted in the Soviet era with the original royal stamps and, most likely, with the use of the original tool. The generally recognized Soviet remake at the moment is the chervonets with a special type of portrait“ Italian ”or“ light bulb ”which is known from date 1898-1904. And there is also documentary evidence about the minting of remodels with the date 1911. "
              Can you explain - WHAT FOR Soviet authorities to release Royal chervonets - when you can release own RSFSR?? !!! Why did the SOVIET chervonets be issued only TWO (!!!) of the year - with the frantic need for currency ??
              The fact that Soviet money was not taken abroad for settlements was described many times in documentary, memoir and historical literature. That is why jewelry depersonalized in Gokhran, royal chervonets spanked, exported paintings / antiques, etc.

              “Six years ago, in 2008, in the jubilee edition of EZGB-FSUE Goznak 1818-2008. History in events, facts, fates.” (Authors A.V. Trachuk, N.M. Nikiforova), in the final section of the book, entitled “The History of the St. Petersburg Goznak Mint in Dates and Events,” the following information was posted: “1925 (year). The minting of gold 10- and 5-ruble coins (“tsarist”, preserved stamp tools) for payment of foreign trade operations (totaling 25,1 million rubles). ”Later, in a similar edition of 2009,“ The Mint. History and Modernity. By 285 anniversary of the St. Petersburg Goznak Mint. " (authors S.V. Orlov, A.V.Bakarev), along with a report on the minting of such gold coins, photographs of the stamp tool stored at the Leningrad Mint are given. But here is the official publication of the above facts, perhaps the first documentary confirmation from the mouth of the management Goznak and the LMD, about a special “confidential order” that was carried out by the Leningrad Mint during the NEP. The “golden blockade” of Western European states, adopted in relation to the Soviet gold piece of 1923, is considered justification for this action of the USSR authorities - a ban was introduced on this coin But bourgeois Europe did not impose a ban on accepting debts with imperial gold coins, completely trusting the coins of the ousted monarchy. Probably, Western creditors considered that the young Land of Soviets would not be able to arrange the production of a full-fledged high-quality gold coin identical to the tsar’s. Although, by the way the quality and composition of the first Soviet zo lots of coins were on top. And to this day, the genuine golden Soviet chervonets of 1923, has been and remains one of the most coveted and dear "guests" in the collection of any self-respecting collector, both coins of the Land of the Soviets and Imperial Russia.(here weird-royal chervonets rampart at any auction; but the Soviet why NOTHING ... the tsar’s, too, on tarry)"
              1. Andrey K
                Andrey K 30 January 2018 13: 48
                +7
                your1970
                ... that is, as a numismatist with 40 years of experience, you agree - that in Soviet times a bunch of royal royal pieces were blinded ...

                You have such a way of communicating - to negotiate for the interlocutor what he did not say?
                In what place did I say that the USSR "spanked" the royal chervonets or agreed with this statement?
                You quote extracts from a book authored by A.V. Trachuk, N.M. Nikiforova. The guys are serious. And you conclude that the USSR "riveted" the royal chervonets ...
                The phrases “apparently”, “perhaps” evoke boredom and nothing more. And then follows the statement that, exactly, the USSR was riveting ...
                That same “confidential order” has remained a “confidential order”, speaking modernly - a fake that has not been confirmed by anything.
                And you know that in 1917, during the evacuation of exhibits of the Mintskabinet of the St. Petersburg Mint, archival documents, stamp tools of the XVIII-XX centuries and numismatic collections disappeared without a trace ...
                So the story about "in Soviet times, a bunch of Tsarist chervonets were blinded" is nothing more than a myth. At least I haven’t seen tsar’s remake made in the USSR mints. What can not be said about our counterfeiters, those guys are arm-willed and big-headed ...
                1. your1970
                  your1970 30 January 2018 15: 43
                  0
                  can you explain why some royal chervonets of the late 19th – early 20th centuries are more expensive at times than others for the same or comparable runs?
                  Quote: Andrey K
                  You quote extracts from a book authored by A.V. Trachuk, N.M. Nikiforova. The guys are serious.
                  - if you don’t like these - you can quote from recognized by you authors about - that "Soviet royal chervonets-myth"? I am ready to read, I wonder ...
                  To the question - why only 2 years of release - you also did not answer ...
                  Currencies were required a lot, industrialization begins, and there’s nothing to buy ..
                  1. Andrey K
                    Andrey K 30 January 2018 16: 29
                    +6
                    Quote: your1970

                    ... can you explain why some royal chervonets of the late 19th and early 20th centuries are more expensive at times than others for the same or comparable runs? ...
                    To the question - why only 2 years of release - you also did not answer ...

                    Tsarist chervonets, Soviet chervonets - the topic is very interesting and fascinating. To clarify, you need a lot of time, but I feel sorry for him.
                    A.V. Trachuk and N.M. Nikiforov write what they could get to the bottom. Therefore, he called them serious guys. The myth of the Soviet royal chervonets will be confirmed with you, if you carefully, delve into the essence of what I said, in the end we will go through the documents. At least about the evacuation of exhibits of the Mintskabinet of the St. Petersburg Mint. Much will fall into place. Why the chervonets was released for two years - damn it, you give ... The question is not for me ...
                    As for the transfer to remodels in 1911, according to the available information there was such a chip, but it was one-time and this "share" was dated, in my opinion, from the moment of the end of coinage of the Soviet chervonets. I also had a question about the re-engagement with the date 1911, back in Soviet times. I did not find a clear answer anywhere. My assumption is that it was this stamp that was preserved after re-turbations with St. Petersburg MD. Although, probably, the Soviet authorities were skilled at cutting stamps with the required date. But it’s hard to believe, because nobody just needs it. Therefore, to say that in Soviet times the royal chervonets “riveted” is not correct.
                    As for my personal opinion and experience as a collector, I can only state the fact that the most careful way should be applied to gold, which went into circulation from the beginning of the twentieth century. Not to its quality, test, but to the presence of fakes.
                    You probably know or assume that this gold did not have such circulation, was not a means of payment for the goods. Inside the country it was used as an investment, just those very “stockings-socks”, abroad as a means of payment for the delivered goods (products, machines).
                    Best regards hi
    3. Andrey K
      Andrey K 30 January 2018 07: 50
      12
      ... What threatens Washington with the fall of the dollar ...

      The answer is more than obvious ...
      The fall of the dollar does not threaten Washington. From the word at all. The Fed, which has been printing unsecured papers for a long time, is a private shop. Well, they will depreciate, well, they will turn on their crazy printer further ...
      Washington will forgive everyone and all its debts, and those who do not agree will be provided with another regular carnation, tulip, orange, green, gray-brown-raspberry revolution. Having paid for the holding of this revolution with fresh, just-printed pieces of paper ...
      1. raw174
        raw174 30 January 2018 08: 37
        +1
        Quote: Andrey K
        The Fed, which has been printing unsecured papers for a long time,

        Secured! I am not an economist, but I understand that there are two ways to provide currency:
        1. Gold;
        2. The influence of politicians, backed up by military force.
        The dollar is held at the expense of the second, the claims of the Russian Federation on its share of influence in the world can certainly shake the dollar’s ​​position, but who needs it? Is it profitable for us? I don’t think ...
        1. IL-18
          IL-18 30 January 2018 08: 54
          +2
          The depreciation of the national currency (any) stimulates the growth of production in the operator countries. By the way, this is already observed in the USA. Another issue is the decline in the purchasing power of the population. But when this population is 300 million, it is not critical for macroeconomic indicators.
          Ordering against Trump. China by all means artificially lowers the yuan. In macroeconomic processes, inflation or deflation in the country is not important, these are tools in the hands of the economic bloc of the government. Here it is important who in this block. For example, we have suspicious personalities.
          1. raw174
            raw174 30 January 2018 09: 19
            +1
            You are apparently savvy in these matters, so tell me, the theory presented by me about the two types of currency support is correct? In your opinion ...
            1. Genry
              Genry 30 January 2018 14: 02
              +1
              Quote: raw174
              Secured! I am not an economist, but I understand that there are two ways to provide currency:
              1. Gold;
              2. The influence of politicians, backed up by military force.
              The dollar is held at the expense of the second, the claims of the Russian Federation on its share of influence in the world can certainly shake the dollar’s ​​position, but who needs it? Is it profitable for us? I don’t think ...

              You have a very primitive concept of currency security.
              On the 1st point: Money has the cost of all the goods that you can buy on them. Gold is just one of the types of goods (it does not deteriorate in time and has a demand).
              On the 2nd: The policy of deception and the substitution of concepts by the United States, made it so that their dollar is provided by the money of other states. For example, the Russian ruble. It is not a national currency, issued by the Central Bank which does not belong to the state. The ruble is a candy wrapper replacing the dollar. The value of the ruble is equal to the value of the dollar bought and put into storage (bound, preserved). Therefore, the Central Bank and buys US securities to increase the ruble mass. And the value of the ruble does not depend on the volume of goods produced in Russia and on oil, too ... but the sale of oil, like other exports, increases the volume of the dollar on the scale with the ruble. If you restore the sovereign ruble, the dollar will lose in value, and the restoration of independence of the currencies of other countries will simply kill the dollar.
              China got out of the influence of the dollar, introduced its currency for international payments and began to supplant the dollar. Therefore, he became the number one enemy for the United States.
        2. Cube123
          Cube123 30 January 2018 09: 12
          +3
          Quote: raw174
          Quote: Andrey K
          The Fed, which has been printing unsecured papers for a long time,

          Secured! I am not an economist, but I understand that there are two ways to provide currency:
          1. Gold;
          2. The influence of politicians, backed up by military force.
          The dollar is held at the expense of the second, the claims of the Russian Federation on its share of influence in the world can certainly shake the dollar’s ​​position, but who needs it? Is it profitable for us? I don’t think ...

          Precisely because you are not an economist, you do not understand. There is no such goal to “hold” or “secure” the currency of all forces. For the State, money is not at all the same as for you. Money for the State is just a mechanism for managing the country. No need to print more or save them better. The task of monetary regulation for the State is to create effective and optimal mechanisms for the distribution and use of real resources, including human ones.
          1. raw174
            raw174 30 January 2018 10: 08
            +1
            Quote: Cube123
            The task of monetary regulation for the State is the creation of effective and optimal mechanisms for the distribution and use of real resources, including human ones.

            Yes, it’s clear that money in itself is nothing, it’s the equivalent of a real product, but it also measures the economic strength and capabilities of the state ... isn’t that so? and then the state is interested in regulating the course, depending on the specifics of the economy. It is good for the Russian Federation when the ruble is small, because then the dollars received from the sale will bring more rubles for domestic use, for the United States it is good when the dollar is big, because they print it, then their paper is equivalent to smaller volumes of output ...
            1. Cube123
              Cube123 30 January 2018 10: 15
              +2
              Quote: raw174
              is not it?

              Not this way! There is only one role for the course. Regulation of the balance of foreign trade. If the rate is overvalued, then import is more profitable than export and the country's gold reserves are depleted and, in the future, default occurs. If the rate is underestimated, export becomes more profitable than import. But gold reserves in this case grow above the optimal size. Money should work, not lie dead weight.
        3. Alex Nevs
          Alex Nevs 30 January 2018 09: 31
          0
          will give time, not much, but TIME- and this is very big money
    4. INVESTOR
      INVESTOR 30 January 2018 08: 14
      +2
      Such articles always touched. Is the dollar falling? Hm. We must buy, which I did. In a couple of months, we'll see where he will be.
      1. raw174
        raw174 30 January 2018 08: 44
        +2
        Quote: INVESTOR
        Hm. We must buy, which I did.

        Jews say: “Buy when everyone sells and sell when everyone buys,” and these guys know a lot about money ...
        1. omit
          omit 30 January 2018 08: 56
          0
          raw174
          [/ i] Jews say: "Buy when everyone sells and sell, when everyone buys," and these guys know a lot about money ... [i]
          Thank you, now I will know where to put the money. fellow
          1. Alex Nevs
            Alex Nevs 30 January 2018 09: 32
            0
            PRO YES ..... laughing
    5. vlad66
      vlad66 30 January 2018 09: 17
      +8
      The current United States, we add, is ruled by an upstart who does not at all understand the international monetary system and its regulation.

      Although the USA is ruled by a clown, we will be realistic, this clown is still a billionaire and got out of bankruptcy four times, which means he understands something. yes
    6. Maz
      Maz 30 January 2018 09: 19
      +1
      Dude, as always, heard a ringing but does not know what he is talking about. The dollar system will be the main one for another hundred years.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 30 January 2018 10: 30
        0
        Throw again everyone and everything!
        Experienced guys, move them off the pedestal ??? Not here and not very now!
    7. Dimontius
      Dimontius 30 January 2018 10: 22
      +1
      The dollar exchange rate is determined by the market on the basis of the policy of the Fed, it is also the federal reserve. All that Mnuchin (Minister of Finance) or Trump says is just market volatility. Is the dollar weakening now because of that? that amid the strengthening of the US economy, as practice shows, the indicators of the whole world are improving, so investors from a quiet American harbor are investing in high-yield assets around the world, thereby selling the dollar.
  2. Sergeant71
    Sergeant71 30 January 2018 07: 25
    10
    Yes, nothing. Calm down already. Under Trump, the economy, already the most powerful in the world, received new growth impulses due to the return of a part of production capacities from abroad and the end of the mortgage crisis. Today I fell, and tomorrow it will grow. A thousand times passed. This is with us, as the ruble flew into the pipe in 2014, that's all .... Like the economy ....
    1. Cube123
      Cube123 30 January 2018 07: 50
      +2
      Quote: Sergeant71
      Yes, nothing. Calm down already. Under Trump, the economy, already the most powerful in the world, received new growth impulses due to the return of a part of production capacities from abroad and the end of the mortgage crisis. Today I fell, and tomorrow it will grow. A thousand times passed. This is with us, as the ruble flew into the pipe in 2014, that's all .... Like the economy ....

      So we have absolutely the same economic mechanism. The cheaper their own currency, the better their own producer. Why, in your opinion, is good in America and bad in Russia?
    2. spirit
      spirit 30 January 2018 08: 48
      +2
      Yeah, another custom article slander Trump. Only Trump makes business and returns money to production and he turns out to be of no use to the economy) and we have only sun-tongued tongues, but in fact a tremendous outflow of capital and he's great, a great leader good paradox)
    3. raw174
      raw174 30 January 2018 08: 56
      +2
      Quote: Sergeant71
      This is with us, as the ruble flew into the pipe in 2014, that's all .... Like the economy ....

      Well, not that everything flew away ... Track not the last 3-5 years, but 30 years. How many crises did we have? 4 come to my mind:
      1. The end of the 80s - the country fell apart;
      2. 97-98 - default, everything fell, inflation at 90%, total impoverishment ...
      3. 2008 - crisis, inflation at 15%, life has become worse, many have lost their jobs;
      4. 2014 - crisis, sanctions, inflation of about 12%, incomes decreased, in some places people were reduced, they were sent on holidays.
      Feel the trend? Does this indicate the state of the economy? The decline in oil prices is a satellite and apparently the initiator of crises, note that in 2014 the decrease was the largest, and the effect on us was the smallest ...
      1. Cube123
        Cube123 30 January 2018 10: 07
        +2
        Quote: raw174
        Feel the trend? Does this indicate the state of the economy? The decline in oil prices is a satellite and apparently the initiator of crises, note that in 2014 the decrease was the largest, and the effect on us was the smallest ...

        It only says that there is a real economic war. The decline in oil prices in 2014 began after Obama's visit to Saudi Arabia. Americans decided to repeat the trick with the destruction of the USSR and the events in Russia of the 90s. All the events you have listed are clearly visible on the chart recalculated for oil price inflation:
        1. raw174
          raw174 30 January 2018 10: 28
          +1
          Quote: Cube123
          It only says that there is a real economic war.

          Of course. It goes on continuously, the "law of the jungle" works, you need to be stronger, but we (the RF) are apparently learning how to hold the blow. Mitigation of the consequences of 2014 apparently provided the very same stub. the fund ... many copies were broken on this topic, but it played a role ... Of course, in the talk that our economy is peeling off the oil needle, in my opinion, are premature ...
  3. Svarog
    Svarog 30 January 2018 07: 26
    +3
    The low dollar exchange rate threatens China with the fact that production will all return to America. Which is exactly what Trump promised.
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 30 January 2018 08: 07
      +1
      Quote: Svarog
      The low dollar exchange rate threatens China with the fact that production will all return to America.

      Well, since the 80s, the dollar has fallen in price by three times, but production all the same has fallen to China.
      1. Svarog
        Svarog 30 January 2018 09: 23
        +2
        Quote: Gray Brother
        Quote: Svarog
        The low dollar exchange rate threatens China with the fact that production will all return to America.

        Well, since the 80s, the dollar has fallen in price by three times, but production all the same has fallen to China.

        In relation to what the dollar fell in price?
        1. Gray brother
          Gray brother 31 January 2018 08: 20
          0
          Quote: Svarog
          In relation to what the dollar fell in price?

          Just forty years ago, you could buy three times more goods on it.
    2. Alex-a832
      Alex-a832 30 January 2018 09: 49
      +1
      Do not confuse with the dollar with national currencies. If the value of only a certain US dollar were reduced (hypothetically), circulating exclusively in the United States, as the national currency, this would stimulate domestic production, which gained an advantage over export, and also production for export would become more profitable. A vivid example of this is the Russian economy during the sanctions period. But the dollar has ceased to be actually a national currency. Americans artificially separate the internal and external balance of dollars in order to exclude the import of excess mass of dollars into the United States and create inflation within the country. The dollar has turned into some securities, not secured by anything, but relying on the fact that they are a universal universal means of exchange of goods. The depreciation of the evergreen will now lead to a loss of confidence in its stability as a universal means of settlement, and the strengthening of alternative systems of interstate settlements, which are also promoted by Russia and China. And this is an occasion for a chain reaction. Everyone will suffer. This will end not only with the global crisis, the mass ruin of countries, famine, but also with large-scale wars. Therefore, the whole world (including Russia) in every possible way delays this "pleasant" moment. The United States takes advantage of this, accustomed to living beyond its means, but this is the mortal dependence of its economy. The US in its current state will not survive the global collapse of the dollar.
      1. KondratKo
        KondratKo 30 January 2018 18: 01
        0
        "The US in its current state will not survive the global collapse of the dollar."
        - Tablecloth is dear to them, it’s high time and the sooner this ulcer in the face of the FSA with their candy wrappers bursts (this is inevitable in the end), the easier the consequences will be for the whole world !!! For the sake of this, I even agree to go overboard and relive the 90s and 2000s once again.
  4. Observer2014
    Observer2014 30 January 2018 07: 28
    +5
    What threatens Washington fall in the dollar
    I don’t know what Washington does. I know and have seen 25 years of the last that this threatens ordinary people in Russia. Prices in the store. And at the gas station.
    As soon as they start yelling at us from all the media, the cracks about the dollar will collapse. So wait for the collapse of the ruble. 25 years of observation. It’s a direct omen. Of the last such super forecasters. Leont'ev recall from “However”
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 30 January 2018 07: 30
    +1
    The dollar has not died yet, but it can happen very quickly! And then there is the yuan and the euro ... They are waiting.
    The country that has real production and real resources will win.
    1. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 30 January 2018 07: 53
      +8
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      The dollar has not died yet, but it can happen very quickly! And then there is the yuan and the euro ... They are waiting.
      The country that has real production and real resources will win.

      I don’t know who will win I know who will not lose. If he does not lose, then the least tied to the dollar. Kim, for example, obviously will not lose. Because they put it on America with its dollar with a large parting. Unlike, unfortunately, from us.
      Purely speculative piece of paper. And who has interpreted us over the past 30 years that the dollar is a “hard currency”? Is this the same paper that is not backed up by anything, which costs less than the paper on which it is printed?
      Gaddafi was killed for trying to get rid of the dollar and introduce an alternative secured by gold - a gold dinar. When the dollar REALLY smells fried for the dollar, get ready for a big war. America just doesn’t let her offend her daily dollar ... She didn’t give it twice in the 20th century - and now she’ll try to enter paradise on someone else’s hump (in the Russian one) ....
      1. Alex Nevs
        Alex Nevs 30 January 2018 09: 34
        0
        Yes, everything is very simple .. read LeninMarx
    2. Polite Moose
      Polite Moose 30 January 2018 09: 27
      0
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      The dollar has not died yet, but it can happen very quickly!

      Eugene! hi
      The thing is that, in the first place, the collapse of the dollar is unprofitable for those who are the owners of its significant volumes (Russia and China, including). Imagine that you have a lot of dollars on your accounts, because of the constant demand for which their value is constantly growing and, accordingly, your national currency is depreciating. But for this bunch of dollars, you can buy an average island in tropical latitudes, or thump the whole porch for about 200 years. If you take the dollar and collapse, then instead of the island and the happy neighbors on the porch you will get a few bags of cut paper. In other words - while the holders of significant volumes of dollars have something to lose, the dollar will not collapse. In any case, under the influence of the outside. The n-ss themselves can collapse it, but this is a completely different story.
  6. Simon
    Simon 30 January 2018 07: 33
    +1
    "Yes, US officials claim that a weakening dollar will benefit domestic exports, but in the long run, a weakening domestic currency will undermine confidence not only in the creditworthiness of the United States, but also in the entire American economy. What trade, when the USA imposes sanctions everywhere, this weakens its dollar.
  7. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 30 January 2018 07: 34
    +4
    What threatens Washington fall in the dollar

    Answer: For manufacturers, increasing the competitiveness of American goods and the growth of local production. For the townsfolk, “nothing”, just as the price of the store was $ 1, it continues to cost .... wink
    1. Alex-a832
      Alex-a832 30 January 2018 10: 03
      +2
      The dollar is an unsecured candy wrapper. If its depreciation will lead to a global reduction in the dollar in international payments (which the world is doing, despite the efforts of Washington and the Fed), then the thick polar fox will come to the US domestic economy. It is even pointless to guess how many dollars will cost in US stores what it costs now 1 dollar. Yes, and the dollar will have to change outwardly completely, banning the exchange of a new national currency for the dollar that we know now.
      1. Monster_Fat
        Monster_Fat 30 January 2018 10: 58
        +3
        The dollar is an unsecured candy wrapper.

        Yes, yes ... "The yuan is ours," and Ukraine will soon "freeze", "go bankrupt," "go around the world", "fall apart", etc. (underline), and in " Syria, we (that is, you) defeated everyone, "etc. All right .... lol
        1. Alex-a832
          Alex-a832 30 January 2018 14: 06
          +2
          “Our everything” for today is the Russian ruble. I in Syria did not participate in the operation of the Russian Armed Forces, unfortunately. The problems of the Ukrainian people are the problems of the Ukrainian people.
          Hurray-patriotism never suffered.
          It is clear that now in the USA there is no sensation that something is happening in the world, and you believe that it will be so forever. But let's look at the changing alignment of forces in the world and evaluate the prospects for the dollar, taking into account the following points: How much is the total external debt of the United States? How much natural product is produced in the United States, and not banking "products"? How much is the US annual federal budget? Subtract the "benefits" from saturating the global economy with candy wrappers.
          Bottom line: pray that this sand pyramid lasts as long as possible, otherwise it will hurt everyone, almost without exceptions (the United States will not be among the exceptions).
  8. Herculesic
    Herculesic 30 January 2018 07: 35
    +1
    Does he really cost anything? This is a worthless piece of paper, brazenly imposed on the whole world by the country as a dollar user! But not the owner! For the US dollar received for indefinite use! Use, not ownership! The United States is a planetary barefoot and gopota, living by the taking of a stranger! For such a long time it’s time to fill their snout!
    1. Romulus
      Romulus 30 January 2018 07: 47
      +1
      Quote: Herkulesich
      Does he really cost anything? This is a worthless piece of paper, brazenly imposed on the whole world by the country as a dollar user!

      crying I got one handred out of my wallet and ... crying
  9. Vard
    Vard 30 January 2018 07: 37
    +3
    God bless him with a dollar ... I don’t understand what this is ... why our ruble is only weakening ... for any reason ...
    1. MadCat
      MadCat 30 January 2018 07: 48
      +1
      Quote: Vard
      God bless him with a dollar ... I don’t understand what this is ... why our ruble is only weakening ... for any reason ...

      it will weaken further, the country in a crisis needs to reduce debts at the expense of population incomes.
  10. HEATHER
    HEATHER 30 January 2018 07: 45
    +2
    the fall of the dollar in the long term threatens world economic dominance of the United States. Rubles will start to print.
    1. Vasyan1971
      Vasyan1971 30 January 2018 08: 20
      0
      Quote: VERESK
      Rubles will start to print.

      Well, this is only after surrender. And only if GDP allows.
  11. Vladivostok1969
    Vladivostok1969 30 January 2018 07: 58
    +2
    The fall of the dollar against world currencies stimulates the export component of the US economy. Trump came to power under the slogan of his country's economic development, which he does, but I want to note that a weakening dollar on world markets will not affect inflation within the United States itself. just imagine what it would be if we still have roofing felts.
  12. Alexander War
    Alexander War 30 January 2018 07: 58
    0
    The yuan is already a reserve world currency, the dollar falls this time, two huge State Debt of the United States. Everybody praises the US economy on the rise, but it is an inflated economy with the giant Government Debt, which is constantly increasing.
  13. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 30 January 2018 08: 18
    +1
    "Muller recalls the 1930s. At that time, the economies of large states waged a trade war. Result: disaster, the Great Depression. Then the United States managed to create a relatively reliable international system of currency regulation."
    Well yes. In other words, they started the next World War, thereby correcting their affairs. Including the creation of a "relatively reliable international system of currency regulation." Until now, coupons are sheared and hoped that this will be forever.
  14. Bosch
    Bosch 30 January 2018 09: 17
    +2
    And at this time, Americans live better than anyone. Gasoline costs, as in Russia, and the pension is 10 times more.
  15. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 30 January 2018 09: 19
    +1
    Quote: your1970
    and banknotes did not go abroad

    The gold dime is not a banknote, therefore, as far as possible abroad did not refuse it. Yes, and for the restoration of the economy, foreign specialists were paid just by the fact that they had weight.
  16. Mimoprohodil
    Mimoprohodil 30 January 2018 11: 36
    +1
    For six months, the dollar fell by 3%. Sentry, dollar EVERYTHING
  17. Professor
    Professor 30 January 2018 12: 30
    +2
    Yes, US officials claim that a weakening dollar will benefit domestic exports, but in the long run, a weakened home currency will undermine confidence not only in the creditworthiness of the United States, but also in the entire US economy.

    Bullshit it. A weak dollar will strengthen the already strong American economy and, accordingly, increase confidence not only in the creditworthiness of the United States, but also in the entire American economy. Trump, however, turned out to be great.

    PS
    Apple paid $ 35 billions of taxes to the U.S. treasury and transfers $ 250 billions from offshore back to the United States. In the face of the collapse of the American economy. lol
  18. armourer
    armourer 30 January 2018 13: 45
    0
    The dollar is everywhere, and in order to curb it, many countries need to be connected. We have firmly rooted it, and it is our fault. We were ruined (the USSR) on purpose, do you think everything is just like that ?! Remember! The dollar loves chaos!
  19. yehat
    yehat 30 January 2018 13: 54
    +1
    upstart that does not at all understand the international monetary system and its regulation

    all your vaunted currency regulation is just 2 fucking ideas. Money is a commodity and you need to pay attention to the trade balance. ALL! there is nothing more to say about currency regulation!
    And trump, unlike thousands of pseudo-wiseacres, understands this. He also understands that monetarists come from an incorrect base of premises, which leads to stable economic problems when "regulation" begins. I do not know who Dude is, but I have big doubts about the fact that a person understands what he is talking about. The article just makes no sense to the readers. If you have a ruler, you are on the drum, measures it in inches, millimeters or parrots, it continues to measure in any coordinates.

    the fall or growth of the dollar does not affect the fact that it is an international settlement instrument.
  20. weksha50
    weksha50 31 January 2018 11: 28
    +1
    “The only thing that is done is that in the short term (during the years of Trump’s reign) it can be beneficial to America. Such trumps do not look into the future: they do not know how. As a result, Mr. President’s financiers advocate for a weak dollar and pursue a real policy in this direction, and Trump gives out another lie ".

    Ahem ... Just recently, in Russia, some of us also tried to prove to everyone that a weak ruble is a blessing and a panacea for the country ...
    Some kind of analogy suggests itself ...
  21. tosha.chuhontzev
    tosha.chuhontzev 31 January 2018 17: 38
    0
    American exporters and tourism will win. On the other hand, this is a possible response to Trump's tax reform in order to slow down investments in the United States. China and Europe are extremely unprofitable, exports and services will go up in price. So, there will be no depreciation. Unless, a couple of frauds on the exchange to deflate the dollar from the Chinese and Russian economics. And there we have a laugh!
  22. Dmitry Tantsyura
    Dmitry Tantsyura 6 February 2018 03: 57
    0
    Washington is just lucky, and the banking system as well as the system serving it does not have much swift, if not a game over.