Military Review

Volker to Ukraine: Russia will not be deprived of veto rights at the UN

40
American Special Representative for Ukraine Kurt Volker gave an interview to the program “Tomorrow” of the TV channel “112 Ukraine”. The speech first came about the results of his negotiations with the presidential aide Vladislav Surkov, which took place in the United Arab Emirates. At the same time, Ukrainian journalists asked Volcker whether there was a “chance” to deprive Russia of the veto right in the UN Security Council.


The statement of the American Special Representative, who had previously made it clear that the meeting did not have any serious "breakthrough" results:
When it comes to the UN, of course, Russia has the right of veto. I do not think anyone will try to change this. I do not consider this option. For me it is important to communicate with Russia, with its representatives directly.


Volker to Ukraine: Russia will not be deprived of veto rights at the UN


According to Volcker, if we are talking about the need to resolve the conflict in the Donbas, then with Russia on this issue it is necessary to conduct a direct dialogue.

Recall that for more than three years, Ukraine has been trying to raise the question of Russia being deprived of its veto rights in the UN Security Council. In this regard, Ukraine is warmly supported by other American puppets - for example, from the Baltic countries. At the same time, it was repeatedly noted that the UN Charter itself does not imply depriving the veto of any of the permanent members of the Security Council.

Against this background, the US special representative spoke about Washington’s preparations for the transfer of anti-tank systems to Ukraine.
Photos used:
Facebook
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 29 January 2018 06: 20
    +3
    Walker indicated the dogs their place.
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 29 January 2018 06: 25
      +1
      He rolls us a barrel! !! fool
      1. raw174
        raw174 29 January 2018 06: 42
        0
        Quote: Herkulesich
        He rolls us a barrel! !!

        This is container shipping, this is the transagency involved! (m / f "Three from Prostokvashino")
        Apparently Anglo-Saxons are brainstorming there and their overseas friends ... they began to raise the topic.
      2. vlad66
        vlad66 29 January 2018 07: 39
        +7
        When Papa Carlo has nothing to do, he either meets with Ukrainians or girls in wood. fellow
        1. Monarchist
          Monarchist 29 January 2018 08: 17
          0
          I own. Not funny. And dad Carlo? We have a conversation about something else
          1. Tula gingerbread
            Tula gingerbread 29 January 2018 13: 29
            +1
            Indeed, Papa Carlo is sacred. lol
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 29 January 2018 06: 34
      +4
      Russia, as the successor to the USSR, is one of the co-founders of the Security Council. Without Russia, there will be no Security Council or UN. However, even this is incomprehensible to the Ukrainian authorities. request
      1. HEATHER
        HEATHER 29 January 2018 06: 40
        +1
        Russia, as the successor to the USSR, is one of the co-founders of the Security Council. Without Russia, there will be no Security Council or UN. And they’ll cheat. All the rules are shot and the ashes trampled into the mud. They cannot forgive us for being mongrels in the backyard of the Empire. A little bark. A caravan (RUSSIA) good
        1. Lelek
          Lelek 29 January 2018 11: 36
          0
          Quote: VERESK
          They cannot forgive us for having become mongrels in the outskirts of the Empire.

          hi
          You mean the Russian Empire, the USSR or today's Russia? Or are you talking about the "European Empire", where the Ruin seeks, breaking its nails? If the latter, then her chances are = 0. Even the last fort in PESA caused a laugh.

          As for Russia, the Ruin will be an instrument of anti-Russia as long as it is under the control of the United States and until the burghers of the "Europe" see. At the same time, the "independent" itself will fall in the economic, political, moral and territorial plans ever lower from year to year. Now the question begs - is the former Ukraine half alive or half dead?
          1. HEATHER
            HEATHER 30 January 2018 06: 26
            0
            You mean the Russian Empire I mean mongrels. And not the Russian Empire. Read carefully. And as for the oaks, I don’t care. Let it crumble into components. It will be better.
  2. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 29 January 2018 06: 24
    +5
    Of course, Russia has a veto. I don’t think anyone will try to change this.
    Nobody will be, but the Great Ukrainians - easily!
    1. cniza
      cniza 29 January 2018 11: 19
      +1
      It became their pipe dream and from understanding this they come out of bile even more. Good time, Vladimir! hi
      1. Uncle lee
        Uncle lee 29 January 2018 12: 02
        +3
        And they gnash their teeth! Salute Victor! hi
  3. Herculesic
    Herculesic 29 January 2018 06: 24
    +4
    It was necessary to deprive ukroinu non-Ukrainian lands, and not bother with it!
  4. Same lech
    Same lech 29 January 2018 06: 30
    +2
    if we are talking about the need to resolve the conflict in the Donbass, then with Russia on this issue it is necessary to conduct a direct dialogue.


    Wow, how clever he became ... even the dialogue is leading with sanctions against our country.
    The principle is simple ... we impose sanctions and for the abolition of them we require any concessions from RUSSIA ... this rogue and swindler WALKER like all representatives of the US State Department.
  5. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 29 January 2018 06: 40
    +1
    Depriving Russia of the veto at the UN is just the wet dreams of Russophobia with low mental abilities ...
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 29 January 2018 06: 44
    +2
    more than three years, Ukraine has been trying to raise the question
    This Bandera state, by hook or by crook, is trying to annoy Russia. Three years beg the Americans to raise the issue of depriving the country of veto power. But the Americans understand that in this case, too, to lose this right, because then the question will arise of excluding such a possibility altogether. Therefore, "friendship" is friendship, and the tobacco is apart.
    1. Tula gingerbread
      Tula gingerbread 29 January 2018 13: 33
      +1
      Exactly. It is impossible to raise the question of depriving a veto of one country.
      It is necessary to revise the UN Charter and, in general, the entire provision on the right of veto.
      Those. all permanent members of the Security Council will lose their rights.
      Do Americans need it? They themselves use this veto all the time.
  7. K-50
    K-50 29 January 2018 07: 05
    +1
    When it comes to the UN, of course, Russia has a veto.

    Jackals howl. laughing
  8. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 29 January 2018 07: 13
    +1
    And what did Banderstadt count on? That they jump with torches, and all run to them with buns and wallets wide open? And in passing will they trample a nuclear superpower into the mud?
    Didn’t you try to work at all? And do not steal?
  9. demo
    demo 29 January 2018 07: 21
    +3
    Recall that for more than three years, Ukraine has been trying to raise the question of Russia being deprived of its veto rights in the UN Security Council. In this regard, Ukraine is warmly supported by other American puppets - for example, from the Baltic countries. At the same time, it was repeatedly noted that the UN Charter itself does not imply depriving the veto of any of the permanent members of the Security Council.

    I read about Ukraine-it is to force myself and cause a gag reflex.
    But that’s interesting.
    When you read about American puppets - the Baltic "tigers", as they kindly call them - "mongrels", the question arises.
    We, the Russian Federation, are present in the Baltic states and in Poland, with our very serious business.
    There is such a company PJSC Inter RAO.
    Here is a list of the property of this company in the Baltic States and not only:
    RAO Nordic Oy (Finland)
    East Energy Company Joint-Stock Company / VEK JSC (China, Mongolia)
    IRL Polska Sp. z oo (Poland)
    JSC INTER RAO Lietuva (Latvia)
    JSC INTER RAO Lietuva (Lithuania)
    JSC INTER RAO Lietuva (Estonia)
    These are generating companies that provide energy to these countries.
    Owner - RF.
    How can it be that we provide them with life in the 21st century (electricity), and they pour slop buckets and barrels on us?
    And our leaders (be they not okay) after each bucket of dirt only wipe themselves and "express concern" with a mournful face.
    And for a couple of weeks "put on the prevention" to put the station - weak?
    Or has the loot already corrupted his eyes so that conscience and pride are scrapped?
    All right.
    If money is the most important thing for Putin and the company, then it’s not worth it to “sing songs” about pride, about Russia, about memory.
    And do not fig figurate out.
    Why are we better than crested people?
    1. Monarchist
      Monarchist 29 January 2018 08: 12
      +1
      Demo, and who makes you read about Ukraine? Is someone with a gun standing everywhere and making you read!
  10. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 29 January 2018 07: 28
    +4
    "Veto" is the fundamental rule of the Security Council. It was adopted as a result of a desperate struggle with the Anglo-Saxons, pushing the "rule of the majority." The “veto right” is also called upon to protect the world from “conspiracies”, “unions” and other “interlovers” in international politics. This right is constantly attacked by the Anglo-Saxons and their sixes, as it stands in the way of the complete enslavement of the world by certain groups of countries.
    1. grandfather_Kostya
      grandfather_Kostya 29 January 2018 09: 53
      +1
      The right of veto-alternative to a nuclear baton on the head does not agree with the opinion of a nuclear power. Those who wish to cancel the veto can try on themselves "an equivalent replacement."
  11. bald
    bald 29 January 2018 07: 41
    0
    Vrazhin understands that depriving Russia of the right of veto, namely at the UN, will lead to the worthlessness of this organization, as such, although it is currently corrupt. Not only Russia will leave the UN.
  12. rocket757
    rocket757 29 January 2018 07: 55
    +1
    He is nobody, no promises, no responsibility .... sho listen to him, there is a congress, the White House !!! As they decide, it will be so .... there sho, one McCain who is stubborn is \ was, there will be followers!
  13. shinobi
    shinobi 29 January 2018 07: 55
    0
    The Yankees might like it, but they are afraid. They have an example with Eun before their eyes. Russia has much more opportunities to give a response in return. But there is at least some semblance of control over us. It remains. And these idiots do everything control has disappeared.
  14. Monarchist
    Monarchist 29 January 2018 08: 08
    0
    "Russia has a veto, I don’t think anyone will try to change this." The charter of the LLC does not provide for this and the Americans are well aware of this.
    That Russia has the opportunity to block any resolution and this is the merit of Andrei Andreyevich Gromyko.
    Somewhere on TV recently I heard about him: "he fights like a fearless gladiator for the interests of Russia, but loves and respects America," as they used to write about him in the West
    1. Antares
      Antares 29 January 2018 12: 48
      0
      Quote: Monarchist
      he fights like a fearless gladiator for Russia's interests

      Western colleagues compared him to a drill. Gromyko was so adamant and meticulous in the negotiations. The phenomenal memory allowed him to corner any interlocutors. And all this is calm, polite and dry. Almost without emotion. The story, when he had to hammer his fists on the UN table in solidarity with Secretary General Khrushchev, who was banging the table with his boot, Gromyko experienced as a personal disgrace.

      A simple Belarusian guy became the Head of the SOVIET Foreign Ministry and defended the interests of the USSR!
      The head of the Soviet Foreign Ministry was uncompromising when it came to the interests of the country - a quality, at first glance, foreign to diplomacy. But it was the firmness of “Mr. No” that helped to avert the threat of a completely non-Cold War with an ideological adversary.
      Andrei Gromyko’s accurate autograph is based on the UN Charter, the Helsinki Act, the START and Non-Proliferation Agreements, and the documents of Yalta and Potsdam. He literally made history. The entire post-war world order is largely the brainchild of Gromyko.
      “Peaceful coexistence, broad international cooperation are the foundations of Soviet foreign policy,” said Andrei Gromyko from the United Nations rostrum.
      He flared up only once. When the Soviet Air Force was shot down in a strange way by a South Korean Boeing that fell into our airspace, US Secretary of State Schulz, trying to represent Moscow as an international robber, wanted to change the agenda for negotiations. Gromyko refused. “So there’s nothing to talk about,” Schultz said. The reaction of the Soviet minister overwhelmed everyone. "He stood up and sharply threw him in the face:" If you do not want to talk, then there will be no conversation. "And Schulz surrendered. He immediately said:" No, I want to have a conversation. "And the conversation went on the topic on which Gromyko wanted, "says translator Viktor Sukhodrev.
      He also made a mistake once, Gorbachev.
      In general, the veto of the Russian Federation at the UN is the merit of Soviet diplomacy and the entire Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The main thing is that it benefits the peoples of the Russian Federation ... and not "technical non-drop"
  15. ibn.shamai
    ibn.shamai 29 January 2018 08: 20
    0
    But what about the statements of the giblets that without dill any dill issues will not be resolved? Choate does not hurt the Americans consult with them!
  16. Altona
    Altona 29 January 2018 08: 24
    +1
    Quote: rocket757
    He is nobody, no promises, no responsibility .... sho listen to him, there is a congress, the White House !!! As they decide, it will be so .... there sho, one McCain who is stubborn is \ was, there will be followers!

    ----------------------------
    You didn’t even add a little bit that Walker is McCain’s servant, and not by himself. Volker conducts these matters in the Donbass on a voluntary basis.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 29 January 2018 10: 20
      0
      All right
      I am impressed by such a system - the main owner can always say that the performer screwed up, the spoiled phone / fax and finally the difficulties of translation, and he is so wise from himself, purely out of business !!!
      They (and not only), it’s finally hard to understand who announced what and why and who refutes whom ???
      Politicians, their yes / no, we can have a completely different meaning or finally something that is medium indefinite!
  17. astepanov
    astepanov 29 January 2018 10: 02
    0
    On many Ukrainian sites they jump: Volker de said that Russia was about to be deprived of the right of veto! True, they either do not quote or the quotes diverge from the headings.
    1. Antares
      Antares 29 January 2018 13: 06
      0
      Quote: astepanov
      True, they either do not quote or the quotes diverge from the headings.

      nothing like this,
      “Russia has a veto. I don’t think anyone will try to change this,” the American diplomat said in an interview with 112. Ukraine, published on Sunday, January 28. According to Walker, he does not consider this option seriously, since it is important for the United States to maintain the possibility of direct communication with the Russian Federation.

      zn.ua
      Russia is unlikely to be denied the veto at the United Nations on the issue of introducing peacekeepers to the Donbass.

      Korrespondent.net
      Of course, Russia has a veto. I don’t think that someone will try to change this, ”Volker noted. He added that, on the whole, he is not considering this option, since it is necessary to “communicate directly” with the Russian Federation.

      asn.in.ua
      in the headlines they play with words, but transmit information like this article on VO. Not only that, if you recall the reaction in 2014 to the Polish counterpart of the President of Poland Bronislaw Komorowski (deprivation of veto)
      stripping a veto is almost impossible. According to Art. 108 of the Charter of the UN Security Council, 2/3 of the members of the UN General Assembly, as well as all members of the Security Council, must vote for the deprivation of the veto. Thus, Russia will have to vote for depriving itself of the veto.

      http://ipress.ua
  18. Topotun
    Topotun 29 January 2018 10: 05
    0
    An attempt to deprive Russia of a veto in the UN will actually lead to the collapse of the UN as a structure. However, there are no guarantees that such an attempt will not be made.
  19. 23424636
    23424636 29 January 2018 11: 03
    0
    The appearance of Walker means that Europe’s puppets are no longer needed and talk about the concessions to Russia of their ancestral territories, albeit in the form of a stage as an independent republic (Ukraine), artificially created by Jewish Bolsheviks on instructions from the Austro-German Intelligence after the Brest-Litovsk Treaty of 1918, will not take place. One thing is that the GDP doesn’t like being able to disown the drunkard of the Russian lands, drunkard Yelchin, and thus can simply calm down in Crimea by giving the All-Great Don Army, which occupy the Donetsk and Lugansk republics, to reproach the Earth. to the enemies of Russia - the Khazar tongmudchiks. sitting in Kiev
  20. faterdom
    faterdom 29 January 2018 11: 40
    +1
    To this, Russia in the person of Lavrov or Ryabkov is simply obliged to answer symmetrically: "Okay, then we will too then! We will not deprive the US of the veto power in the UN Security Council. So be it ..."
  21. koshmarik
    koshmarik 29 January 2018 14: 30
    0
    Amerikosy even moved their brains - for a normal politician does not even think that Russia, the country at the forefront of the creation of the UN, can be deprived of the right to veto. Well stupid.
  22. Alex Nevs
    Alex Nevs 30 January 2018 15: 40
    0
    born to crawl (tearing the constitution with an armed coup), never get up on all fours
  23. RGC
    RGC 30 January 2018 23: 32
    0
    Did anyone doubt it? To do this, the entire UN mechanism must be rebuilt. And how can a permanent member of the UN Security Council be vetoed if he (this member) imposes a veto on such a decision?))) In fact, for this purpose it was conceived that no member of the Security Council could be infringed by other members