The head of Crimea gave an interview to a major American radio station

Head of the Republic of Crimea Sergey Aksyonov gave an interview to an American radio station Nation Public Radio, during which he answered questions about the state of affairs in the Crimea after the territory of the peninsula became part of Russia in 2014. According to Sergey Aksyonov, the region has returned forever to the Russian Federation, it will not go back to Ukraine, and therefore the nomination of any conditions in this regard is absolutely meaningless.

The Head of the Republic of Crimea noted that nothing threatens the peninsula militarily, as it turned into an impregnable fortress.

American journalists asked Aksyonov how foreign sanctions had an impact on him personally and on the Crimean economy. Aksyonov noted that “almost nothing”. The head of the republic once again reminded that he personally does not have foreign assets, and that the economy of the Crimea, despite external sanctions, continues to develop. The impetus to the development will add the commissioning of the Crimean bridge.

Sergey Aksenov:

None of the Ukrainian presidents paid attention to the Crimea (when he was part of Ukraine) as much as Russian President Vladimir Putin does today.

This is the first interview with Aksyonov to a large American media. The interview in the United States was titled: "Putin’s Man in Crimea:" We have returned to Russia forever. "

Comments

[Grandfather]

everything is fine ... but why does not the gref with his “sperbank” go to Crimea? "owners" do not order?

[Herculesic]

Sansky and sran-ktsiy afraid!

[oldseaman1957]

The head of Crimea gave an interview to a major American radio station

- A clear man Aksyonov! And the Americans, who decided to find out the issue from the source, should be respected. Rarely do they do it now ...

[210ox]

I do not agree with his statement. ". The head of the Republic of Crimea noted that nothing threatens the peninsula, since it has turned into an impregnable fortress." Not at the expense of an "impregnable fortress" ... And about "nothing is threatened." ..Threats. Moreover, even from the side of our "home-grown oligarchs" ... They correctly noticed about Sber and telecom operators .. Yes, and on the "continent" some people sabotage the introduction of the domestic payment system Mir .. I don’t say anything about the military threat .

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: 210ox

Correctly noticed about Sberbank and telecom operators

And what, excuse me, "right"?
Sberbank, for example, unlike foreign banks, accepts payments from customers (enterprises) from the Crimea. Foreigners who actually comply with the sanctions do not accept.
RNKB (Russian National Commercial Bank) - the backbone bank in the Crimea - received from Sber its entire branch network there. A trifle, oh ...
And no company wants to go under sanctions.
They, unlike the "patriots" from the couch, who need a "shit bullshit", for this analyst there are other competent people.
That's about as

[210ox]

For some reason, many organizations, the same banks, are forced to climb under the sanctions .. For example, Krayinvest. But the Sberbank ATMs (we called it the hell branch) work through the stump of a deck, and the same KIB is more or less reliable. I mean the Kuban.

Quote: Golovan Jack

Quote: 210ox

Correctly noticed about Sberbank and telecom operators

And what, excuse me, "right"?
Sberbank, for example, unlike foreign banks, accepts payments from customers (enterprises) from the Crimea. Foreigners who actually comply with the sanctions do not accept.
RNKB (Russian National Commercial Bank) - the backbone bank in the Crimea - received from Sber its entire branch network there. A trifle, oh ...
And no company wants to go under sanctions.
They, unlike the "patriots" from the couch, who need a "shit bullshit", for this analyst there are other competent people.
That's about as

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: 210ox

For example, "Krayinvest"

Compared to Sber, CIB is a small midge. And the "partners" are completely uninteresting, and it is difficult to squeeze them - it is a regional bank and operates in the Russian Federation.
Unlike Sberbank, with its branches ... there are many places outside the Russian Federation, so to speak.
Not at all enthusiastic about Sberbank (although, IMHO, now he is still friendlier to the client than he was under the Union), but forcibly shoving one of the largest banks in the country “under sanctions” (which, in essence, urry patriots call for) utter stupidity.
IMHO.

[Strips]

It’s just that Sberbank is an excellent indicator that Russia is truly afraid of sanctions so that patriots do not say cheers.
Moreover, the reserve fund Russia has already used up and closed. God forbid oil prices fall.

And today the news is expected:

On January 29, an American “Kremlin report” is expected to be published, which will allow the United States to impose sanctions on officials and business representatives close to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

And to maintain power, especially after the election, Putin will need to cover the losses of his entourage
And at the expense of someone else they will do it quite understandably.

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: Tiras

quite understandable ...

... food on Fridays, today is Monday only.

[vlad66]

Quote: Tiras

to maintain power, especially after the election, Putin will need to cover the losses of his entourage

We don’t respect the elections with the forest, the forest and campaign there, on Mondays.

[Strips]

Quote: vlad66

With the elections by the forest, the forest is not respected and with the campaign there, on Mondays we do not serve

Yes, you can see who you serve or who you

[vlad66]

Quote: Tiras

see who you serve or who you

Burn sick

[avt]

Quote: Tiras

It’s just that Sberbank is an excellent indicator that Russia is truly afraid of sanctions so that patriots do not say cheers.
Moreover, the reserve fund Russia has already used up and closed. God forbid oil prices fall.

Poor bulk player, did Potapenko overhear with Nikitos Isaev in addition?

Quote: Tiras

On January 29, an American “Kremlin report” is expected to be published, which will allow the United States to impose sanctions on officials and business representatives close to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Don’t cry a little, it was already from the burned-out banker Pugachev and Panama dossiers who had fled to London, where the hetman Porosyonok got specifically, but they didn’t say anything about GDP. He’s not educated so that some, even us the bulk, found the ends So jump in a chair and in mud. And the ATMs of Sberbank in Moscow slow down, it happens.

[Dimal777]

I wonder how much sber was in the Crimea before 2014? I'll tell you - units! The whole network is a former privat, Aval, VTB. But the main thing is of course privat.

[Same lech]

but why does not the gref with his “sperbank” go to Crimea?

German Oskarovich is an inveterate con man ... and I would love to build a personal wall with all the amenities for this shot.

http://пятаяколонна.рф/docs/post2168.html

It is for this reason that I cannot support the current government in the face of GDP.
It’s just that a lot of different taxes are inconceivably introduced to the mind ... they raise prices for everything and everything ... and then Gref has fun in the methods and methods of large-scale Looting of our people and the authorities seem to notice and see nothing ...
I don’t understand and never understand GDP in this regard.

[siberalt]

Now, if in Crimea there were prices for holidays like in Turkey, then foreigners would go there, spitting on sanctions.

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: siberalt

Now, if in Crimea there were prices for holidays like in Turkey, then foreigners would go there, spitting on sanctions.

No.

[rotmistr60]

foreigners reach out spitting sanctions

Parliamentary delegations are visiting. After that, Ukraine proceeds to snot and initiates criminal proceedings. And foreigners on their own initiative have a rest, but are also surprised by the prices that do not correspond to the quality of the service, as the media wrote more than once.

[Polite Moose]

Quote: Dead Day

but why does not the gref with his “sperbank” go to Crimea?

Honestly and in good faith anti-Russian sanctions supported.

[Ural resident]

Sberbank is not the same savings bank that it was before. From him only a sign remained.
This is the same private bank as everyone else. Gref kept bragging that he was working in other countries, so he was afraid of losing the walrus.

[ul_vitalii]

Quote: A resident of the Urals

Sberbank is not the same savings bank that it was before. From him only a sign remained.
This is the same private bank as everyone else. Gref kept bragging that he was working in other countries, so he was afraid of losing the walrus.

In, like the Grudininsky state farm.

[Elephant]

We don’t need Grefovsky Sperbank in Crimea! Crimeans remember well how the Ukrainian daughter of Sberbank, as well as Privatbank and others, in 2014 fled from the Crimea along with the money of the inhabitants of the peninsula.

[Herculesic]

The headline doesn't say anything yet! There, the essence of what was said is so twisted that reading the article will be scary!

[Grandfather]

Quote: Herkulesich

The headline doesn't say anything yet! There, the essence of what was said is so twisted that reading the article will be scary!

they will compare Crimea with North Korea, and Aksyonova with Eun ...

[samarin1969]

Aksyonov respect and support. He is trying to do a lot within the system. With his personal influence, transport, life, organization of work of various organizations changes greatly.
About the economy and security, of course - half the truth. Big business works according to gray schemes. Security - ......... But in general, the "sovereign man" answered as it should, so as not to "disgrace himself before the powers."

[bald]

Having passed the "censorship", the interview, if at all reaches the reader in the states, will be interpreted in a completely different way.

[koshmarik]

All that is needed works in Crimea. The main problem is the reorganization of the local government, which remained unchanged after Ukraine and working the old fashioned way and resolving the issue of private property, with which there are still a lot of misunderstandings in the Crimea.

[thinker]

Quote: oldseaman1957

The head of Crimea gave an interview to a major American radio station

- A clear man Aksyonov! And the Americans, who decided to find out the issue from the source, should be respected. Rarely do they do it now ...

Lively conversation, good, but the standard interview is annexation, oppression of the Crimean Tatars. Take a look at the source, respect will be reduced.

“There is an atmosphere of fear of saying what you really think,” said Nariman Dzhelalov, leader of the Crimean Tatar minority. “Only that small group of people who are completely in love with Putin feels comfortable saying what they think. Anyone who has a critical point of view will be very afraid. ”

[Seva100pol]

The radio station is not Nation, but National Public Radio. A trifle, but still. The article includes the utterances of all there Nariman Dzhelalov from Medjelis. And the tone in general is, they say freedom was exchanged for prosperity. Although of course this is a clear progress for the most democratic.

[LVMI1980]

Why do you need Sber in the Crimea? few ATMs?
Formally, there is no Sbera in the Crimea, otherwise our tourists in Turkey and other countries will raise a howl if they don’t have maps read, they passed ... (I’m disgusted to look at them even though I work in one company)

[roofing hedgehog]

why do we need a savings bank here in Crimea? a bank that "dances" to the tune of the State Department will ... boycott the development of the peninsula and pry money from depositors.