Military Review

UN Security Council condemns the monstrous terrorist attack in Kabul

40
The UN Security Council judged the terrorist act in the center of Kabul, the victims of which were more than 90 people and called for bringing the perpetrators to justice, reports TASS.




The Security Council called the attack “monstrous” and “mean”, expressing condolences to the relatives of the dead and injured, as well as to the authorities of Afghanistan. Security Council members recalled that “acts of terrorism are a crime and cannot be justified by any motive.”

The members of the Security Council stressed the need to bring the perpetrators, organizers and sponsors of these reprehensible terrorist acts to justice, and also called on all states to actively cooperate with the Government of Afghanistan and other interested authorities in accordance with their obligations under international law and Security Council resolutions,
the statement said.

At the same time, the Security Council stressed that in the fight against terrorism, states should respect international norms relating, inter alia, to human rights.

Recall that on Saturday, near the government quarter in Kabul, an explosion thundered. According to media reports, a suicide bomber blew up an ambulance loaded with explosives. The explosion, according to the latest data, killed 95 people, 163 were injured.

Responsibility for the explosion took over the Taliban (prohibited in the Russian Federation).

A little earlier, the American representative to the UN, Nikki Haley, stated that “the US policy towards Afghanistan is working,” and even allowed the possibility of holding talks with the Taliban in the near future.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Chertt
    Chertt 28 January 2018 11: 24
    +3
    Meaningless talkers
    1. The black
      The black 28 January 2018 11: 30
      +4
      ... And true democracy with civilization came to Afghanistan. And for over 15 years now. And besides the production of heroin does not do anything.
      1. cniza
        cniza 28 January 2018 12: 58
        +2
        A little earlier, the American representative to the UN, Nikki Haley, stated that “the US policy towards Afghanistan is working,” and even allowed the possibility of holding talks with the Taliban in the near future.


        It works very clearly.
    2. Pirogov
      Pirogov 28 January 2018 11: 31
      +3
      Quote: Chertt
      Meaningless talkers

      But no, when it is beneficial for the United States, the UN very sensibly implements everything and adopts the resolutions necessary for mattresses.
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 28 January 2018 11: 47
        +2
        A little earlier, the American representative to the UN, Nikki Haley, argued that "US policy on Afghanistan works."

        Actually, the Taliban are not friends with drugs and are trying in every possible way to fight it .. Maybe this is the whole thing ..?

        The United States there, not without reason settled, guard and control ..
        1. Deniska999
          Deniska999 28 January 2018 11: 52
          +3
          In fact, the bulk of opium poppy production is concentrated in the Taliban.
          1. poquello
            poquello 28 January 2018 12: 03
            0
            Quote: Deniska999
            In fact, the bulk of opium poppy production is concentrated in the Taliban.

            in Afghanistan, apart from Karzai, there’s no particular responsibility, he would have to spin a civilian movement like "Afghanistan is free from the Taliban, Americans and other nasty things trying to dictate living conditions." Maybe from the border with Pakistan to start inland, there are chances.
            1. Giant thought
              Giant thought 28 January 2018 12: 17
              +1
              Here they are American fosterlings in action, how much more grief they will bring to people, these scumbags.
          2. Chertt
            Chertt 28 January 2018 12: 17
            +1
            Quote: Deniska999
            In fact, the bulk of opium poppy production is concentrated in the Taliban

            This is where such interesting information ??. The Taliban, in fact, for the cultivation of poppies, is buried right on the field. All opium plantations in US-controlled territory
            1. Thunderbolt
              Thunderbolt 28 January 2018 12: 46
              +1
              Quote: Chertt
              The Taliban, in fact, for the cultivation of poppies, is buried right on the field. All opium plantations in US-controlled territory

              Nothing of the kind. They buried when the main income was from transit smuggling of ordinary commercial cargo from Pakistan through themselves. But when the international coalition began its operation in Afghanistan, they blocked this traffic and reoriented to growing poppy (justifying it with the fact that these weapons against infidels) .Do not worry, not only the CIA profits on Afghan heroin, but also the Chinese mafia, Iranian, the mafia of the southern republics of the USSR, the Russian drug kings also live well and they all spit deeply by and large for the war in Afghanistan. On the contrary, they are glad that the war , in a stable country, the desk would close.
          3. MIKHAN
            MIKHAN 28 January 2018 13: 14
            0
            Quote: Deniska999
            In fact, the bulk of opium poppy production is concentrated in the Taliban.

            Where does infa come from? From echo .. heh heh
            1. Deniska999
              Deniska999 28 January 2018 17: 44
              0
              Do you believe only Channel One?
    3. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z 28 January 2018 14: 13
      +1
      Quote: Chertt
      Meaningless talkers

      Their usual translation of arrows into mythical
      Security Council members emphasized the need to bring justice to the perpetrators, organizers and sponsors of these reprehensible terrorist acts

      although the words are given right there
      US representative to the UN Nikki Haley claimed that "US policy on Afghanistan works"

      And it is clear what and how it works under the leadership of the States in other countries!
  2. taiga2018
    taiga2018 28 January 2018 11: 28
    +1
    how many Americans are holding troops there that even in Kabul they cannot provide order?
    1. The black
      The black 28 January 2018 11: 31
      +2
      Quote: taiga2018
      how many Americans are holding troops there that even in Kabul they cannot provide order?

      They are not holding troops there in order to ensure order, but in order to protect opium fields. they have business there .. laughing
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 28 January 2018 11: 53
        0
        Quote: Black
        They are not holding troops there in order to ensure order, but in order to protect opium fields. they have business there ..

        The Taliban scammed drug dealers who came there from all over the world .. Here and the panic in the USA has begun!
        Once again, the Taliban movement does not respect the drug and dries them constantly ..
  3. corporal
    corporal 28 January 2018 11: 29
    +2
    Afghanistan .... in vain we ran there in the 79th. Still blazing.
    Brezhnev is an old senile.
    1. vlad66
      vlad66 28 January 2018 11: 41
      13
      Quote: Corporal
      Afghanistan .... in vain we ran there in the 79th. Still blazing.
      Brezhnev is an old senile.

      And striped in 2001 means not in vain? It's a heroin and opium stream like a river flowed. Well Well
      Cowboy Bush is definitely insane.
      1. corporal
        corporal 29 January 2018 02: 08
        +1
        Quote: vlad66
        A striped in 2001 means no wonder?

        We left behind the bonfire of a civil war that grew into international terrorism.
        Yankesov was affected, they decided to put out everything ... did not work. Now they jump on our rake there.
        1. svp67
          svp67 29 January 2018 04: 42
          0
          Quote: Corporal
          Yankesov was affected, they decided to put out everything ...

          "Touched"? "Put out"? Yes, they simply decided to take advantage of the fruits of their activities, since their contribution to the organization of this "mess" is not small. And when they realized that "something went wrong," they decided to "clean up", but clearly underestimated the "hydra" that they themselves had raised.
    2. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 28 January 2018 11: 55
      +1
      Quote: Corporal
      Afghanistan .... in vain we ran there in the 79th. Still blazing.
      Brezhnev is an old senile.

      I’d be silent if you don’t understand .. I don’t want, like you to prove and explain something, it’s useless .. hi
      1. Lacoste
        Lacoste 28 January 2018 14: 21
        +1
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Quote: Corporal
        Afghanistan .... in vain we ran there in the 79th. Still blazing.
        Brezhnev is an old senile.

        I’d be silent if you don’t understand .. I don’t want, like you to prove and explain something, it’s useless .. hi

        What can you explain, durik, except for komunyak slogans, and the silly "hehe"?
        1. MIKHAN
          MIKHAN 28 January 2018 14: 58
          0
          Quote: Lacoste
          What can you explain, durik, except for komunyak slogans, and the silly "hehe"?

          You remind me of Novodvorskaya (deceased) ..Under the fierce malice was, she died with that .. hehe ..
          Mackaine is also near death laughing Take off before it’s too late and obey the Russians!
    3. Polite Moose
      Polite Moose 28 January 2018 12: 11
      +2
      Quote: Corporal
      Afghanistan .... in vain we ran there in the 79th. Still blazing.

      In vain / not in vain, it's hard to say now. Some sources claim that our troops entered there a couple of days before the American, others say that Brezhnev was bred like a donkey with a carrot. At that point in time, when the troops were brought in, all (well, or almost all) citizens of the USSR were sure of the correctness and necessity of such a decision.
      Now we were replaced by n-ss. As a result, lawlessness in the country. I believe that now the Afghans would give dearly in order to exchange the regiments for shurawi. Afghan old people remember those days and respect former enemies, and in the East it is customary to listen to their words. So, I don’t think that everything was in vain. Friendly relations with Afghanistan are ahead of us. In the very near future. Personally, it seems to me.
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 28 January 2018 13: 26
        +1
        Quote: Polite Elk
        In vain / not in vain, it's hard to say now. Some sources claim that our troops entered there a couple of days before the American, others say that Brezhnev was bred like a donkey with a carrot. At that point in time, when the troops were brought in, all (well, or almost all) citizens of the USSR were sure of the correctness and necessity of such a decision.

        I wrote here on a site for a long time .. (I don’t remember the links ..)
        When our contingent was withdrawn from Afghanistan, a journalist came to the officer with a question .. "Are you glad that this war in Afghanistan has finally stopped and you are leaving ..?
        The officer spat spitefully and said in a short whisper, "They're following us .."
        And so it happened later ... men!

        We will be back, but in a different format ..
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 28 January 2018 11: 32
    +2
    advocated holding the perpetrators accountable
    This is probably in the minds of the Security Council appeared after that
    in the fight against terrorism, states must respect international standards regarding including human rights.
    It turns out that terrorists can kill hundreds, and they need to be treated within the framework of law and the protection of human rights in order to bring to justice? Honestly, some kind of madhouse amid Western liberalization. So it may come to the point that the word terrorist is replaced by the ornate "a person who wants to kill."
  5. Masya masya
    Masya masya 28 January 2018 11: 37
    +7
    Security Council members emphasized the need to bring justice to the perpetrators, organizers and sponsors of these reprehensible terrorist acts

    So what? who will perform? meaningless organization ...
  6. APASUS
    APASUS 28 January 2018 11: 42
    0
    Here is such a mysterious situation with these terrorist attacks in Afghanistan.
    In fact, administrative buildings in Kabul are being blown up there and there is no sound at all about the explosions in the possessions of the drug plantation planes that are being guarded by the Americans. They are breaking up the power that the Americans support, but do not touch the Americans themselves?
    It’s clear that there are motley groups, but any Taliban will always be closer.
    It’s very similar to managing the process, where the basis of all the contradictions, otherwise they would be kicked out the next day after the terrorist attack. That's why the terrorists go quietly where they need to, they know the place, the roads, go around the posts and achieve their goal.
    1. avt
      avt 28 January 2018 12: 36
      +1
      Quote: APASUS
      They blow up the power that the Americans support, but do not touch the Americans themselves?

      Actually, they rushed to the embassy quarter and to see which of the general people was hooked not sour, the UN Security Council races was overreacted
      "Monstrous" and "vile"
      The benefit of the Russian embassy in another area.
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 28 January 2018 13: 11
        0
        Quote: avt
        Actually, they rushed to the embassy quarter and to see which of the general people was hooked not sour, the UN Security Council races was overreacted

        but they’re not blowing up military targets, which would be more logical. They’re blowing up to introduce disagreements (like the version)
    2. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 28 January 2018 18: 42
      +2
      Quote: APASUS
      Here is such a mysterious situation with these terrorist attacks in Afghanistan.
      In fact, administrative buildings in Kabul are being blown up there and there is no sound at all about the explosions in the possessions of the drug plantation planes that are being guarded by the Americans. They are breaking up the power that the Americans support, but do not touch the Americans themselves?
      It’s clear that there are motley groups, but any Taliban will always be closer.
      It’s very similar to managing the process, where the basis of all the contradictions, otherwise they would be kicked out the next day after the terrorist attack. That's why the terrorists go quietly where they need to, they know the place, the roads, go around the posts and achieve their goal.

      You are reasoning correctly. It’s not a matter of drugs, as many have unsubscribed ... The only thing that such explosions can do is push away followers and sympathizers to the Taliban, which, in addition to fighting the Americans, is opposing the expansion of the presence and influence of ISIS in Afghanistan. What is the point of undermining the Taliban for peaceful Afghans if Does the Taliban persistently oppose official Kabul and set the task of taking Afghanistan under its control? More stupid is hard to imagine. Recently, there has been a tendency for all the political forces of Afghanistan to sit at the negotiating table, as Lavrov said, in order to end the armed confrontation and move towards a political settlement of the conflict. After this statement, the United States has repeatedly "tarted" that Russia supports the Taliban. A peaceful solution to the issue (as in Syria) does not suit only one side - the United States. Most likely, the mattresses used their ISIS branch in Afghanistan, which undermined the suicide bomber. If we evaluate the consequences of the attack, the result of the explosion makes the Taliban representatives a party with which it is impossible to negotiate and at the same time sets the local population against the Taliban, which in the end is only beneficial for the United States.
  7. Vard
    Vard 28 January 2018 11: 49
    0
    At the same time, the Security Council emphasized that in the fight against terrorism, states must respect international standards, including, inter alia, human rights. That is, they claim with a blue eye that they are detonating there, and they with all due respect ...
  8. donavi49
    donavi49 28 January 2018 12: 08
    +2
    By the way, the attack on the 5 * hotel - where the 40 + person died, took over the local IG. They posted a picture of the performers.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 28 January 2018 12: 10
      +3
      This explosion - arranged by the Whites, the Taliban. They loaded the ambulance to the top. We drove with sirens through external checkpoints, drove into a closed area. Only inside the zone (800 meters from the Embassy of India) they were stopped by a checkpoint - where they tried to inspect them. There was an explosion. More than a hundred died.
  9. Evil 55
    Evil 55 28 January 2018 12: 25
    +1
    Why is it for the Taliban? Recently, due to any terrorist action, star-striped flags peep out ..
  10. Kars
    Kars 28 January 2018 12: 39
    +3
    Strange, we must put the blame on the USA. They are the owners there.
    1. cniza
      cniza 28 January 2018 13: 01
      +1
      And they accuse Russia of delivering weapons to the Taliban.
  11. Dormidont
    Dormidont 28 January 2018 12: 53
    +1
    It is strange that so far the United Nations has not blamed Russia
  12. NF68
    NF68 28 January 2018 16: 57
    +2
    For some reason, the UN Security Council didn’t even notice that no less barbaric terrorist act was committed in the Odessa House of Trade Unions on May 2.
  13. biron
    biron 29 January 2018 23: 49
    0
    These talkers condemn some kind of explosion in Donbass and Lugansk for 3 years and kill people; civilians are keeping silent about this.