Military Review

Cinema: the death of Stalin, hysterics and hamsters ...

106
With a brisk pace in specific Russian (well, technically “Russian” technically) media, the scandal around the comedy film “Stalin’s Death” has been forged by the media. “Pocket” film critics, network hamsters, belolentochnye youngsters and other liberal zoo are catching up to this event. At the same time in their political orgasm about the film itself almost forgotten that it is not surprising.


A little about the picture itself. If the “Red Heat” was a typical “cranberry”, insisting on an exquisite cognac of the “cold war”, then the “Death of Stalin” is the same “cranberry”, but floating in some kind of village Braga with a characteristic stench. And the point is not that the creators' brains have nothing but western mythology about our Soviet period storiesNo, not at all. The problem is that in the modern world under the screen of satire, free interpretation, etc. you can shove anything. Therefore, the authors of the picture are ready to laugh not only at the "stupid shovels", but also at the "victims of the Gulag." Which, by the way, is quite dogmatic for the West. In fact, who are we to them? Papuans True, the Papuans with nuclear weapons, space and nuclear industry, their own civilization, which does not allow zapadentsev sleep at night. So the kids decided to "joke."

Cinema: the death of Stalin, hysterics and hamsters ...


The director of the film was a typical semi-finished product of the united Europe - Mr. Armando Iannucci. This Italian boy was born in Scotland and still eats up on the land of Foggy Albion and Hollywood, shooting near-political comedy series. Having eaten up on these hacks himself a sickly self-conceit, he apparently decided that he could take something more substantial than a seasonal television product. Yes, and no extra money.

So it came to this Italian women almost all Soviet party leaders inadequate idiots. Against them, even Marshal Zhukov looks like a positive hero. This is despite the fact that he is depicted as a brutal uncle with a touch of the severity of Conan the barbarian, Zhukov in the film is endlessly hohmit with or without. The acting in this film is generally discouraging. Actors, of which noisy hamsters claim to be masters of "first magnitude" (this, by the way, is far from being so), recklessly make faces and make faces. As a result, they bring the tape to a natural circus freaks. To look at it becomes disgusting, even if you forget about who these actors embody on the screen. At the same time, I do not mention the “chafing” of endless shootings that took place in the “bloody scoop” instead of breakfast, lunch and dinner.



Oil painting - Marshal Zhukov conducts a "sweep" ...

Naturally, a citizen of Russia, who has enough self-respect not to consider himself a Papuan and also has enough respect for history as a science, will have a normal desire to take the Italian by the breasts. Later, in the process of companionship, remind the presumptuous European semi-finished product of the frozen Italian icicles of the 8 Army, apparently lost in our steppes, or suggest joking about the Holocaust. Or bring an Italian proverb, which vividly depicts the attitude of the Italians themselves to their military-political figures - “if a newborn Italian hit on the ass, and he screams, it means he will be a great opera singer, and if he is stuck, he will be a great Italian commander”.

But, I fear, this artisan from the cinema simply does not understand this. After all, this European non-cosmopolitan fully shares the “European values”, and since there is a void behind the latter, they are replaced by various complexes. What is really there, the whole project called “The Death of Stalin” is a gall cynical spittle towards Russia (yes, yes, Russia, not the USSR) from Europe and its permanent owner, the United States, in order to get rid of these complexes. Well, what else can Europe justify its humiliated position raped by African and Middle Eastern aborigines? Europe, in which the witch hunt in the form of a fight against harassment zaskmarila men from Lisbon to Oslo? Europe, whose values ​​turned politicians and special services into impotent? Right, show the wild East. You look and a couple of thousands of fertilized Europeans is not such a high price.

By the way, the collective American-European character of this hack is emphasized not only by the national hodgepodge of actors (in one of the roles even Olga Kurylenko, now a representative of a European farm, is lit up), but also by the original source, on the basis of which this storm was removed. The basis was the French comic, which "progressive" hamsters persist in calling it a "graphic novel." Well, for those who didn’t read anything more than Navalny’s Twitter, of course, this is a novel ... The comic itself is totally permeated with the spirit of Шар Charlie Hebdo ’, therefore the humor in it is of an appropriate level.

Naturally, the scandal had to break out. But, as if the trash story in the free interpretation was not enough, promotion of hysteria around the project began long before the mention of this trash in the media. The story is downright detective with the wondrous scent of a well-played provocation and a touch of cultivated artificially liberal hysteria.



"Film critic" Anton Dolin is indignant, naturally, unselfishly



Some time ago, the media began to replicate the message that the family tape "The Adventures of Paddington 2" trying to ban. Mobilized network hamsters and hysterical citizens, nurtured by a “mime” Internet view of the world in which pink unicorns, if they vomit, it was a rainbow, were enraged. You see, “bloody mordor” is not only totalitarian, but also stupid, since it prohibits a completely innocent film. When it became known that no one forbade the picture, but simply postponed the date of the premiere, the mobilized hysterics made the face a book, pereobulsya and began to sink against interfering with the free market. And when news appeared in the information field that the premiere of “Paddington” was pushed for the sports drama “Movement Up” - a screech in a liberal monkey house forced the glass to break even in neighboring open-air cages. Considering that only one type of Soviet sportswear acts on the “handshake” like holy water on possessed with characteristic hiss and the release of sulfur, the reaction was expected.

But how does this relate to the painting “The Death of Stalin”? First of all, Paddington, the mimic British bear cub, and the death of Stalin, the same office, the Volga company, which has offices in the USA, rolls over the thrash. In general, for this desk scandal - just a gift. Secondly, "Stalin's death" is trying to push through right before the presidential election. At the same time push through with a thunderous crash and scandal. And finally, thirdly, in order to warm up the media space and tame juvenile hamsters, it was necessary first to demonize the Ministry of Culture with the example of fake information about banning a family movie. It’s not that I defended our Ministry of Culture and its head, this unlicensed version of Harry Potter, which turned part of the RVIO official website into its bookshop, but they didn’t aim at them, but at the stability of the information environment of the country, young people, already disfigured by modern education .



Well, you can come up with something yourself, hamsters?

It bore fruit. After the artificially bloated scandal with “Paddington”, not very clean liberal figures squeezed the Ministry of Culture into a full-blown “breath of freedom” in the form of the project “Death of Stalin” and excitedly shouted that the censorship was back. Moreover, this censorship immediately attacked the poor little bear first, and then stood up for the "bloody tyrant"! Horror!

Racing, without checking the information and without going into details, the assistants hurried to rush on this topic. And, no, they didn’t buy, they didn’t send out new training manuals, it’s just that when a kneeled pro-Western position becomes a fashion in certain circles, it’s just scary to fall out of the cage of “your party”. Talent, these guys do not shine, who needs them outside of this sewage life? One has only to look at the headlines of their information hack, as it becomes clear. The whole range of lack of talent - from the fierce kowtow to the witty level of the 5 class toilet class for boys.



A masterpiece of a certain Igor Igritsky - journalism on the verge of a fence from a very damaged orphanage

At the same time, even relatively sane cries for lost profits or the right to access information are also past the box office. The premiere of The Death of Stalin masterpiece took place ... in September 2017 of the year! Drain pictures in the network has already passed, and enthusiasts from the cinema have already posted their reviews on the network at various sites specializing in the film industry. By the way, some of these same reviews, instead of working with a screen like "people's opinion", on the contrary, only proved the absolutely political provocative nature of the situation. More than half of the laudatory texts consist of stinging near-political spittle, and the reviews themselves are mostly from the pen of the audience of our political pedophiles a la Navalny. However, they know how to foul up the comments and wind up the rating even for assorted paintings.

Therefore, the ban to roll a picture is quite reasonable, since it has nothing to do with either business or art. And, perhaps, this is the only thing that is capable of temporarily knocking down informational turbulence with the characteristic sprinkling of people around. Well, until the hamsters and their owners find another opportunity for “righteous” anger ... By the way, it’s not long to wait - the authors of the original comic about Stalin already paint pictures about the death of the Russian empire. Poklonskaya them in the pole.
Author:
106 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Grandfather
    Grandfather 29 January 2018 07: 04
    10
    one wants to exclaim: in the opera, everything is modern “art”! trash, bacchanalia and degradation.
    1. siberalt
      siberalt 29 January 2018 07: 36
      39
      Yeah. We are chasing smoking citizens in parks and porches, and to get a law on responsibility for insulting national dignity, things do not reach. It seems that the curators do not allow it. And they would have fined such distributors in the amount of money to go bankrupt, would not have shown us all the foreign filth. am
      1. Antianglosax
        Antianglosax 29 January 2018 12: 36
        19

        That says it all. There is no third.
        Traitors and fools - a godsend for the enemy!
        1. yehat
          yehat 29 January 2018 16: 24
          +3
          Stalin would have shot you for it :)
          learn his methods - he WANTED to be criticized, with respect and constructively.
          And if there were excesses or wrong steps, he could change his position and constantly
          probed this topic (and for this work Vissarionychu respect), because the toadies refused to communicate with him.
          Why did he begin to respect Rokosovsky in '43 or Beria even earlier? Because the man came, told Stalin (figuratively) that he was a fool and proved it to him, but could not stand the dirty linen in public. This is a Stalinist, not industrialization.
          1. ans
            ans 30 January 2018 19: 02
            +1
            http://archive.4plebs.org/dl/pol/image/1491/95/14
            91951679641.jpg. I think it should be important for you to understand .... that Stalin is, first of all, humiliation !!!
        2. ans
          ans 30 January 2018 19: 18
          +2


          Here are some I want to ask! Where are you from, my good ones =)) Clever patriots, subtle connoisseurs of Stalin and his "achievements" ... =)
          1. yehat
            yehat 30 January 2018 23: 58
            +3
            and where is Stalin? are you going to hang all the sins of 130 million in 30 years per person?
            1. ans
              ans 31 January 2018 07: 12
              +2
              Quote: yehat
              and where is Stalin? are you going to hang all the sins of 130 million in 30 years per person?

              What do you think, Stalin has nothing to do with it? "white and fluffy" means! Oh well.....
              1. yehat
                yehat 31 January 2018 09: 32
                +3
                you just don’t have to dump everything together
                in Ukraine, Bela Kun with a girlfriend and Khrushchev strangled a half million together
                What is Stalin to blame for that?
          2. Sergey Horuzhik
            Sergey Horuzhik 1 February 2018 14: 24
            +2
            actually, the top picture is a photograph of a Finnish concentration camp for Russians during the war. It's just a shame that you use such base methods of propaganda. And here is the original. http: //img15.nnm2.com/3/8/5/8/1/ 33ccca8c
            a80e45be3ea7a0d29a5.jpg
            1. Sergey Horuzhik
              Sergey Horuzhik 1 February 2018 14: 26
              0

              here is the original
      2. svp67
        svp67 29 January 2018 12: 52
        +2
        Quote: siberalt
        And they would have fined such distributors in the amount of money to go bankrupt, would not have shown us all the foreign filth.

        Why is it simply enough not to advertise such films, they themselves will quickly leave the screens. And now the version of “Matilda” is repeated and the question is: “and who benefits from this?”
      3. krops777
        krops777 29 January 2018 14: 06
        +4
        And they would have fined such distributors in the amount of money to go bankrupt, would not have shown us all the foreign filth.


        You can twist the Russian low-grade comedy Hitler Kaput, but you can’t judge Stalin’s death one-sidedly, censorship should be objective, especially with regard to historical events.
    2. Alex_59
      Alex_59 29 January 2018 07: 58
      +8
      Quote: Dead Day
      in opu, all modern "art"

      Where did you see art here?
      Art is of course everything. And there is nonsense, and there is good. But here there is no art at all. This is a massive chewing gum for popcorn eaters. After all, there are torso who voluntarily go to look for this hat FOR MONEY ... Well, what art is it ...
      1. svp67
        svp67 29 January 2018 12: 54
        +7
        Quote: Alex_59
        Where did you see art here?

        But it turns out to be different. The set fire to the FSB door - it turns out to be ART, but the set fire to the bank door in Paris is a crime ... The line is very thin and it runs evenly along the Russian border
      2. yehat
        yehat 31 January 2018 14: 22
        0
        I went to the last row with girls for such films and it wasn’t before the movie)))
    3. Petr1968
      Petr1968 29 January 2018 17: 08
      +3
      Quote: Dead Day
      one wants to exclaim: in the opera, everything is modern “art”! trash, bacchanalia and degradation.

      Who's stopping you from listening to "Valenki-Valenki"? You want to forbid it, but not to you, do not you? And for the film .. after such an advertisement I’ll look 100%)
      1. Vasilenko Vladimir
        Vasilenko Vladimir 29 January 2018 21: 11
        +5
        Quote: Petr1968
        And for the film .. after such an advertisement I’ll look 100%)

        and if here they will discuss shit, gobble up ?!
        no really you just admitted to your own stupidity
        1. Petr1968
          Petr1968 30 January 2018 12: 47
          +2
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          and if here they will discuss shit, gobble up ?!
          no really you just admitted to your own stupidity

          The logic of a moron .. forgive of course, but this is a medical fact, my friend))) You have so often the topic of shit in posts .. you have to treat the intestines, you are painful)))
          1. Vasilenko Vladimir
            Vasilenko Vladimir 30 January 2018 13: 24
            +2
            moron logic is if
            And for the film .. after such an advertisement I’ll look 100%)
          2. RGC
            RGC 30 January 2018 15: 46
            +3
            Do not pay attention to uncle. This former party organizer (it seems to me) immediately runs to complain about the administration as soon as Stalin and his associates are touched.
            1. Vasilenko Vladimir
              Vasilenko Vladimir 30 January 2018 18: 28
              +1
              Quote: RGK
              This former party organizer (it seems to me)

              cross yourself can help
              Quote: RGK
              he immediately runs to complain about the administration as soon as Stalin and his associates are touched.

              they stood behind me when I wrote anonymous letters wassat ?
  2. apro
    apro 29 January 2018 07: 10
    +6
    What we are filming about those times from that opera too. Recall Migalkov with his weary or circles on the water.
  3. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 29 January 2018 07: 13
    +6
    Magazines and directors - the louder you fart - the more .... stink! belay
    1. moskowit
      moskowit 4 February 2018 09: 03
      0
      You are mistaken, my friend, the stink is mainly from the "whispers" .....
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. inkass_98
    inkass_98 29 January 2018 07: 19
    +4
    Well, is the point here all this "near-cultural" bullshit to disassemble? That the "Death of Satlin" hack, that "Paddington-2" (and the first was rather frail hack, from the second I’m waiting for a bigger nightmare).
    Let's make even more advertising for foreign films, we’ll disperse the wave. By the way, about the domestic manufacturer: here, somehow, a certain author (I won’t name, otherwise I’ll get under the sanctions again) dismantled “Upward Movement” as a complete crap. So it turns out that there’s nothing to watch in the movies, and the change in rental of one by-product to another in total does not change anything.
    But in fact, everyone’s tastes are different, as they say: who likes pop, who loves pop, and who’s popov’s daughter, and who’s generally pig cartilage. So it turns out that everyone should draw conclusions for himself.
    Z.Y. The actors who starred in "The Death of Stalin" are not the most passing, as the author claims. Not the first magnitude, but not the last ones on the list. Steve Buscemi (Khrushchev) and Jason Isaac (Zhukov) are well-known guys. And Kurylenko to the heap (she does not appear in her farm, I think, she lives more and more in Hollywood), which shone in many famous films. Still, an objective approach to film reviews ...
  6. Stas157
    Stas157 29 January 2018 07: 30
    19
    . The media is scandalous around the comedy film "The Death of Stalin"
    Come on, only foreigners would mock our history! Kremlin then try worse. We decided to celebrate the centenary of the Great October Revolution with chernous films on the first channels of the country, in which the leading actors of Russia took part. For example, take the film "Trotsky". What kind of caricatures are there of Lenin (played by Stychkin) and Stalin! Instead of the ideological leaders of the working people, they showed in the form of some petty evil criminals, some deliberately unbalanced, inferior people.
    We won’t show what was shot in the west. And what was removed from us, looked half the country.
    1. Petr1968
      Petr1968 29 January 2018 17: 11
      +2
      Quote: Stas157
      Instead of the ideological leaders of the working people, they showed in the form of some petty evil criminals, some deliberately unbalanced, inferior people.

      Or maybe they were like that?)) Or is Lenin a good grandfather from children's books?))
      1. Vasilenko Vladimir
        Vasilenko Vladimir 29 January 2018 21: 12
        0
        Quote: Petr1968
        Or is Lenin a good grandfather from children's books?))

        unlikely, just what does it change?
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 29 January 2018 08: 02
    +3
    for this desk scandal is just a gift
    And because the more articles on this topic, the more interest the “hamsters” have in this film and the “desk” does not remain in the loser.
    1. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 29 January 2018 11: 25
      +1
      Quote: rotmistr60
      for this desk scandal is just a gift
      And because the more articles on this topic, the more interest the “hamsters” have in this film and the “desk” does not remain in the loser.

      Without arguing with you, I want to note - thanks to the "articles on this topic" I have not lost a bit of my time watching this chernukha. If I was interested in Stalin and his era, I probably would have watched this little filmman and spit, and cursed, but alas, I would have lost time.
      1. AlNikolaich
        AlNikolaich 29 January 2018 20: 46
        +2
        And here I am, all the same I will take the time and look now opus. Download from the pirates and see. And I’ll draw my conclusions! There is one reason - to argue about the taste of pineapples you need with those who have tried them. (C). The film "Borat" was also banned from us. Looked, made conclusions. After all, to argue about shit in detail, you need to make sure the quality of shit! Excuse me...
        Matilda did not look, and I will not! This is dirt! Firstly, it’s disgusting to climb into the bed to the king and the ballerina, and voice their version of those events. It is clear that there are no saints there, but it is disgusting to stir up the sheets of others!
      2. ans
        ans 30 January 2018 19: 28
        +1
        << Being interested in Stalin and his era, I would probably watch this film and spit and curse, but alas - I would lose time >>
        But look!
        Maybe these photos will help you and you will stop spitting, and even enjoy wink

        1. AlNikolaich
          AlNikolaich 1 February 2018 09: 16
          0
          And what does the American comic and photograph of children have to do with Stalin?
  8. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 29 January 2018 08: 04
    +4
    Satire about some of the tragic pages of history is inappropriate. It is unlikely that the Germans would want to see something similar about the Nazi era, and the Japanese - about the bombing of Hiroshima.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 29 January 2018 08: 24
      +2
      They don’t want to ... so they are bent, they can’t get anywhere!
      We don’t have to bend ... but it’s time to understand the foreign “wizards”, the spring has already compressed to the limit and it is not going to burst !!! metal, we can and cast iron, but hardening is what we need !!!
    2. would
      would 29 January 2018 08: 33
      +4
      It’s unlikely that the Germans would want to see something like that about the Nazi era,


      It is worth noting that the Germans very much laugh at Hitler and the Nazi era. As a striking example, I immediately recall Er ist wieder da - He is here again.
      1. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 29 January 2018 08: 39
        +9
        Quote: rait
        It is worth noting that the Germans very much laugh at Hitler and the Nazi era

        A Germans little neighing Auschwitz over the stoves? wink
        1. novel66
          novel66 29 January 2018 10: 04
          +3
          maybe it’s not weak for them, but from the Jews they’ll immediately arrive in a joke
        2. would
          would 29 January 2018 14: 24
          +3
          Maybe some are not weak, but first it will fly from the local Criminal Code, after from society, after from a bunch of organizations. With such matters in Germany it is very, very strict, and even the film I mentioned had an ambiguous reaction as far as I know, although I did not directly rehabilitate anyone and did not joke over the Second World War. IMHO, the action of the film was transferred to the present in many ways in order to avoid accusations after jokes over the Second World War.

          For understanding. Jean-Marie Le Pen was fined by a French court (not even Germany where it is even more severe) for the rehabilitation of Nazism by 1.2 million francs. For the phrase "gas chambers were only an episode in the history of World War II" .... that's all. This is the whole phrase, the whole rehabilitation of Nazism. Minus 1.2 million francs. What will happen after a joke on Auschwitz furnaces in Germany I can’t even imagine ...
    3. lukewarm
      lukewarm 29 January 2018 09: 21
      +3
      Quote: ALEA IACTA EST
      It is unlikely that the Germans would want to see something like this about the Nazi era

      Yes, it seems. Laughter and laughter. There, Aloizych came to life and walks in today's Germany and communicates with residents. Through laughter, nostalgia is visible. The entire film, of course, was not shown, and the clips on the "Star" in one program resulted. But laughter over the bombing of the allies of Dresden (why not Hiroshima?) Wishing probably will not be found. Well, except for the stoned shkolota who grew up on drugs, same-sex love. This breed of "universal man" is international, I think. This is equally likely to be found in Moscow and in Berlin. And how do you get it laughing - urine. All the same, he can no longer be a man.
      1. Normal ok
        Normal ok 31 January 2018 15: 26
        0
        Quote: unwillingly
        There, Aloizych came to life and walks in today's Germany and communicates with residents. Through laughter, nostalgia is visible. The entire film, of course, was not shown, and the clips on the "Star" in one program resulted.

        Yes, in bulk pirated copies, on the relevant sites. If you look in its entirety, then you better understand the message of the authors than when you cut the frames and tell others.
    4. Petr1968
      Petr1968 29 January 2018 17: 13
      +2
      Quote: ALEA IACTA EST
      Satire about some of the tragic pages of history is inappropriate.

      Satire about dictators was and is always pertinent. Moreover, the film, as I read the comments, is not about Stalin, but about his environment, which began to divide places .. By the way, in some countries the funeral is held with songs and dances ...))) But the film is not about death, but about life surroundings !!
      1. Vasilenko Vladimir
        Vasilenko Vladimir 29 January 2018 21: 13
        0
        Quote: Petr1968
        Satire about dictators was and is always pertinent

        let’s hang on to your mom
        1. Petr1968
          Petr1968 30 January 2018 12: 43
          0
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          let’s hang on to your mom

          A little snag, she is not a dictator ... though ...))) When you liberals and others who disagree with you, you cover here with all the words, you think about your mom, you are our offended ??)))
          1. Vasilenko Vladimir
            Vasilenko Vladimir 30 January 2018 13: 32
            0
            do not jump off the topic, well, so which of your relatives is lying in a pile of crap?
            1. Petr1968
              Petr1968 30 January 2018 15: 06
              0
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              do not jump off the topic, well, so which of your relatives is lying in a pile of crap?

              Actually, in every post about g .. write .. you are a shit infantryman, shoot everyone here with your govnopushechki?))) How old are you, 18-20-25?))) Who do you vote for? Who has such an audience, I just want to know? Zhirik? Zyuga? ... Putin?)))
              1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                Vasilenko Vladimir 30 January 2018 18: 59
                +1
                Quote: Petr1968
                How old are you, 18-20-25?)

                You’ll poke your finger ...., well, I think you know where
                Quote: Petr1968
                Really in every post about r .. write ..

                Well, are you a fan of films about him
    5. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 29 January 2018 21: 12
      +1
      Quote: ALEA IACTA EST
      Satire about some of the tragic pages of history is inappropriate

      satire and this are two different things
  9. Loess
    Loess 29 January 2018 08: 09
    +2
    For once, the Ministry of Culture has become preoccupied with the struggle for the minds and there is such a scandal ... Well, better late than never ...
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 29 January 2018 08: 21
      +2
      What a scandal! Spit and grind.
      In this particular case. we don’t need such a thing and screams on this topic themselves will die away. To whom it is numbing, let them go to the "territory of freedom" or climb into the Internet.
      Business then. Forget it!
      1. Loess
        Loess 29 January 2018 08: 24
        +1
        I agree completely and completely! However, it’s boring for someone, but it's nothing ... they’ll get used to it)
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 29 January 2018 09: 46
          +1
          This is the norm. There’s no way to inflate a big scandal, they will spud the tiny ones, a lot .... Schaub finally didn’t subside.
          Okay, forget, step over, not a big bunch, but smelly, pooh.
  10. Doliva63
    Doliva63 29 January 2018 08: 24
    +6
    Every state filters everything that affects the mass consciousness, for it is a vehicle of ideas and a guardian of the ruling class - who still does not understand fool Therefore, since all this is shown somewhere, it means, “someone needs it.” (C) So you have to get around the Internet, where you choose what to watch.
  11. ImPerts
    ImPerts 29 January 2018 08: 32
    +4
    On the one hand there is a problem. We have no censorship. For such reasons, the picture cannot be closed. In the United States, they make it easier, they recommend that movie theater owners do not mess with a particular picture under the threat of tax problems. And the deed is done and the pens are spotless.
    But liberals of the local spill are trying to hide here too. A screech about Serebryannikov is so worth it that his ears are wrapped.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 29 January 2018 09: 49
      +1
      Exactly, everywhere the authorities do what they need ... at the liberal nonsense about the complete freedom of the Western progressive world, it can convince absolutely ... daunters!
    2. Petr1968
      Petr1968 29 January 2018 17: 14
      +1
      Quote: ImPerts
      But liberals of the local spill are trying to hide here too. A screech about Serebryannikov is so worth it that his ears are wrapped.

      This is where it lays ears, on TV there are almost no ... Listen to the echo of Moscow and read Medusa? stop
  12. Brigadier
    Brigadier 29 January 2018 08: 36
    +4
    Stalin is not on these creatures!
  13. parusnik
    parusnik 29 January 2018 08: 46
    +2
    Why be surprised and indignant .... In the era of the USSR, they wouldn’t make such a film .. respect and fear .. Now they don’t respect, they’re afraid .. no more ... as the author correctly pointed out, we are Papuans with an atomic bomb for them. ..And why should we respect it if we ourselves spat on our past and put on display, look at our foreign partners, we condemned our past ... And now they are laughing at us ... They’re removing such crap ... By the way, I remember in the early 80s, the Japanese made a film about Port Arthur, where Russian soldiers are shown in an unsightly light .. Central newspapers, Soviet protests, h they say that the Japanese took off for libel ... And now the state has such a policy for this film with both ours and yours ..
    1. ImPerts
      ImPerts 29 January 2018 08: 55
      +6
      Quote: parusnik
      In the era of the USSR, such a film would not have been shot .. respected and feared.

      But Rambo 2 and 3 removed, were not afraid.
      They made films, there was simply no hype among the media.
      This is now wherever you spit, everywhere there is news about stars and socialite and how they jump from one bed to another.
      1. parusnik
        parusnik 29 January 2018 09: 06
        +1
        But Rambo 2 and 3 removed, were not afraid. They made films, there was simply no hype among the media.
        ... And what about Rambo, was once the head of the Soviet state? Or a Soviet military leader, a high-ranking party leader ..? ... Or is it a prototype of those mentioned ..? .. Such films like Rambo were shot a lot, even TV shows where the main villain was Soviet Boris ... But films against Soviet leaders, like this in the West they didn’t shoot, at least I don’t know .. If you know, call me .. I’m interested ...
        1. ImPerts
          ImPerts 29 January 2018 09: 20
          +1
          Quote: parusnik
          ... And what about Rambo, was once the head of the Soviet state? Or a Soviet military leader, a high-ranking party leader ..?.

          1. parusnik
            parusnik 29 January 2018 09: 56
            0
            I’m the one for you, you’re mine to me ... Even this film, which is dedicated to a specific historical event, to specific historical persons ...? .. Like the film about which it is written in the article ..? ... You still write that this The movie clip from which you published is based on real historical events ...
        2. yehat
          yehat 29 January 2018 16: 32
          +1
          in the days of the USSR, everything was simple.
          if someone turned to personalities and touched seriously, they remembered only 3 letters: the KGB, which found ways to indicate the minuses of the transition to personalities and it worked.
          They could argue ideologically, but very often the initiators themselves did not like the transition to individuals.
    2. Alex_59
      Alex_59 29 January 2018 10: 32
      +4
      Quote: parusnik
      In the era of the USSR, such a film would not have been shot .. respected and feared ..

      Yes, this is not the only point. And in the general degradation of culture and man. More antics, cheap satire and "below the belt" humor. Even if you compare other genres, for example, simple (non-political) comedies of the same USA 50-x-70-x today. This is heaven and earth - then there was subtle humor, intellectual, and now rzhaka and antics. Not everything, of course, there are exceptions both then and now. But the concentration of booths has become clearly higher.
    3. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 29 January 2018 11: 30
      +1
      And how do you like this -
      Lana k
      Lana k
      6 hours ago
      Level of Russophobia in America: a month ago, I went with my friends to the Americans at the off-Broadway theater - Linda Gross theater in Chelsea in New York; the play “Describe the Night”. Russians of course are shown by ugly villains. I think you, like me, will “like” the recipe for “Russian soup” that the Russian characters ate: prick your finger with a needle, dip your finger in a plate with leeches, after the manifestations drink blood and burst, you can start eating soup. KGB-East Vova at the beginning of the performance also eats this soup, in the 3rd department becomes the Russian president. My friend seriously asked me if the Russians really eat or ate such a soup. The grandmother of this friend who raised him was Russian (though he himself does not know a word in Russian). What can we say about the rest of the Americans who watched the performance. They will soon show that the Russians drink the blood of infants for breakfast, and everyone will believe it. Drunken me on benches in Russia have never been so disgusting as everyone who surrounded me in the theater and clapped actors. The performance was staged professionally. In the program, a link to historical facts about the events raised in the play. In America, they often leave representations. But this one was inspected to the end, despite the fact that it lasted almost 3 hours. The hall was full. ... The more offensive.
      1
  14. Gardamir
    Gardamir 29 January 2018 08: 47
    +1
    If Putin wins the election, the film will certainly be shown.
  15. unignm
    unignm 29 January 2018 08: 54
    +1
    oh and how much shit of the same kind was taken by OUR Tvaarans?
  16. BAI
    BAI 29 January 2018 09: 11
    +4
    Well, how does it differ from the Russian film Hitler Kaput. If the “Russian producers” can be shot and shown in Russia, then why can’t you take off a foreign one behind a hill?
    If you don’t like it, anyone can shoot “The Death of Kennedy” (as Mitrofanov had shot the “Julia” movie). Why do you make noise in vain?
  17. Freeman
    Freeman 29 January 2018 09: 11
    +1
    Naturally, a citizen of Russia who has the self-esteem not to consider himself a Papuan and also lacks respect for history as a science will have a normal desire to take the Italian by the breast.

    There has already been a similar case in the history of Russia.
  18. parma
    parma 29 January 2018 09: 40
    +1
    Yes, God, that you all clung to this trash? There is such a niche, it has its own fans, which means there is a proposal, I don’t see anything political here! Enough to see in everything with the word Russia mockery and humiliation (although it is necessary and this also happens) .. Something no one shouted that in the "iron sky" the Americans were presented as degenerates (I do not say about the praise of the Nazis), in "The Bodyguard- for the killer "the British were worthless, in the" Dictator "Arabs were made dumbasses (by the way, the same author scoffed at the British 2 times in his work), and there are a lot of such paintings .... You can even go back to Chaplin ...
    Concerning "Pedinskton" and its transfer, it’s an elementary financial question when, in place of one G (well, I didn’t digest the first film, and I don’t want to watch the second one) palm off another (from my films I can watch, oooooochen, a few films, and by the way comedy, there’s less demand from them), domestic ... By the way, it’s just about the domestic Mr. I noticed that the more it is advertised on TV (in particular in the news), the worse the film ...
  19. arhPavel
    arhPavel 29 January 2018 09: 57
    0
    All the turbidity around the film is a normal PR and will end a couple of weeks after the premiere. You just don’t have to go to such films. It’s not necessary to slaughter your head.
  20. sds87
    sds87 29 January 2018 10: 44
    +1
    As I look, “echoes”, “tapes”, and various “new and not very” newspapers were especially zealously noted. Considering that at least one of the resources is financed by Gazprom, I have more and more questions for this “public domain”, which has already been lit up with “Kolya from Urengoy”. Elements openly hostile to it operate in the country, which closely cooperate or have joint control together with our state. About the movie data - "The Death of Stalin" I already wrote in another topic. Let the West take off about its leaders Paskvili, and not touch the statesmen of other countries. True, this is not possible: the West is simply not capable of not throwing mud at its enemies. They have been doing this for centuries. But it’s good that you can always filter most of the film production that wants to get into our country. China very censors all incoming traffic of new films and no one howls. Many tapes of American and European cinema are simply not skipped there .. And in Russia, any ban even on explicit guano is "total censorship", "tyranny". No, really. Filters should be, otherwise guano will fill up the ears. No one has the right to shoot pascivili and "comedy" about the leaders of foreign countries. Yes, and about the leaders of their countries, too, do not shoot paskvili. Hi Mikhalkov.
    1. Petr1968
      Petr1968 29 January 2018 17: 36
      +1
      Quote: sds87
      Filters should be, otherwise guano will fill up the ears.

      Someone drags you to the cinema by the hand ???? Do not want to watch, do not watch. But I’m not a Stalinist and I consider him a bloody dictator, I’ll definitely look.
      1. Vasilenko Vladimir
        Vasilenko Vladimir 29 January 2018 21: 15
        +1
        Quote: Petr1968
        definitely look.

        do not forget to fall in shit, there about it
        Do you know why China did not fall apart, and the USSR has sunk into oblivion ?!
        1. Petr1968
          Petr1968 30 January 2018 12: 44
          +1
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          do not forget to fall in shit, there about it

          You leave your entertainment and beliefs to yourself, okay?))
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. Petr1968
              Petr1968 30 January 2018 14: 14
              +1
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              really funny

              No, it's funny about Stalin !!))
  21. Ural resident
    Ural resident 29 January 2018 11: 35
    +3
    Honestly, somehow this film passed me by. I didn’t even hear about him, but thank you, interested. I'll see
    "The shocking pace in specific Russian (well, purely technically" Russian ") media is scandalous around the comedy film" The Death of Stalin. "
  22. Proton
    Proton 29 January 2018 11: 40
    0
    I propose in reply to take a picture of Blue Winston laughing about difficult alcoholic relations in the family of the Dukes of Marlborough, who combined the post of Premiere with a booth.

    PS And what was banned correctly, for Neh.
  23. Zloy
    Zloy 29 January 2018 11: 42
    0
    I propose to shoot a wildly funny comedy about the murder of Lincoln or Kennedy. Or here is about the English king Edward 2, who was put on a red-hot poker, because at that time in England LGBT people were not yet popular. Or about Louis 16, who, together with his wife and everyone else who got caught, was very happy to demolish his head. or about Charles 9, who killed 30 thousand Huguenots with an oar in one night, and then died wildly ridiculous in terrible convulsions from arsenic.
    1. Knizhnik
      Knizhnik 30 January 2018 11: 20
      0
      The fact of the matter is that it won’t work, because it will be sick for us. And they are not sick.
    2. Antares
      Antares 30 January 2018 12: 21
      +1
      Quote: Zloy
      Or here about the English king Edward 2

      The Tudors series fully reflects the cruelty of the king, his fornication and mores. Popular. Borgia-pro dad walked ... so they’ll take off again.
  24. sleeve
    sleeve 29 January 2018 11: 53
    +2
    Well, what are we so simple, honestly? Well, why are we being led when? It’s just an ideal square for mass psychology, starting from theorists, ending with terry practices up to the authors of Bitcoin. Yes, you yourself (those who detonate any scandalous discussion bomb on any topic) do not know how much the second, third sense, depth and conspiracy in the event you are offering us ... And it started! The professional brain of a Russian (mentally) person, multiplied by literary advancement, multiplied by patriotic (or anti-patriotic ... no difference, we are all Russian by and large) capable of generating such irreplaceable "conspiratorial" structural formulas and constructions that even "submerge" It’s not necessary. It’s not necessary to throw up and support if the Russians “accepted” it. They are all themselves, with argumentation, explanations and a full discussion with raising its degree to the maximum.
    Did a simple Russian man in the street know that there was a whole conspiracy of foreign intelligence services, salary fakers and simply “interested conspiracy circles” who, through movie-making in the style of “Movie43” or “Onion News”, are found to undermine the foundations? No, I didn’t know ... Somewhere until mid-January. But did the same man in the street know that the pro-Putin power structures had already begun, and now they would finish tightening the censorship loop and total control over the already "fooled" society? The same is not a tooth kick ... But no. All this exists with its own evidence and all that ... Do we have foundations and bonds in our society? There is. Mom do not worry. True, they are not noticeable to everyone, because they are not wrapped in a bastard with bast shoes, or they are generally not inclined to tolerance (well, like they don’t accept the braces of these eccentricities with the biblical division of the sexes or the freedom to mock and mock certain things PRIVATE). And come on, then, then these brackets are for the expert community with both signs of a political orientation, understandable to the Russian people, to push through ... Maybe it’s not worthwhile for a simple discussion about the value of the cinematic and personal attitude of Russia to authors who are not “rich” in all respects ( or x .. he knows what it's called) to drag the sway of the ideological foundations of Russia? And it’s not exactly an hour they will believe who doesn’t need that it is possible through caricatures and jokes ... And a wave of unfunded slops will flood us. And so without waiting ...
  25. A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 29 January 2018 13: 21
    +2
    Muscovites were outraged by the fact that Nikita Mikhalkov insulted the memory of Stalin and Russia
    Residents of the capital of Russia regarded the scenes from Mikhalkov’s painting "Burnt by the Sun-2" outrageous and insulting the memory of Joseph Stalin. One of the Muscovites said that the footage she saw caused her unpleasant sensations, one of the young people suggested that the filmmakers set themselves the goal of disgracing Stalin and Russia.
    As it turned out, it was an experiment of journalists: they showed the shots to Muscovites, explaining that we are talking about the trailer for the painting "Death of Stalin."
    1. Petr1968
      Petr1968 29 January 2018 17: 37
      0
      Quote: A. Privalov
      Residents of the capital of Russia regarded scenes from Mikhalkov’s painting "Burnt by the Sun-2"

      good good
  26. Altona
    Altona 29 January 2018 15: 15
    +1
    I don’t even want to discuss it. There are special 18+ films and other rubbish for closed channels, to whom it is interesting, in the form of banter and freak shows, in the form of gloomy cartoons like "South Park". Why drag a discussion of movies like Awesome Trip here?
  27. ICT
    ICT 29 January 2018 15: 16
    +2
    network hamsters, belolentochnye youngsters and other liberal zoo.


    only a gay could give birth to this,
    and for objectivity, you can at least look at the falcon

  28. Nemesis
    Nemesis 29 January 2018 16: 13
    0
    They shot another scandalous film, not the first, in recent years. So what kind of reaction did you expect?
  29. zzdimk
    zzdimk 29 January 2018 17: 06
    0
    It is pleasant to live in the era of decay (c) V. Erofeev.
    What’s more (s). Unknown humanist.
    1. AlNikolaich
      AlNikolaich 29 January 2018 20: 56
      0
      Quote: zzdimk
      It is pleasant to live in the era of decay (c) V. Erofeev.
      What’s more (s). Unknown humanist.

      - So that you live in an era of change! (Chinese curse).
  30. omit
    omit 29 January 2018 18: 03
    +3
    None of you have seen the film, but you condemn everything together. Full scoop. I don’t perceive Western humor at all, but this does not mean that it is bad, I just don’t understand. But now I’ll definitely watch the film if it’s available. I wish.
    1. AlNikolaich
      AlNikolaich 29 January 2018 21: 03
      +2
      Here I am, too.
      "I myself have not read Pasternak, but like everyone ... I condemn" - this phrase, very characteristic, very despised by me!
    2. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 29 January 2018 21: 18
      +3
      Quote: omit
      The film has not been seen by any of you, but condemn all together

      tell you you really need to gobble up the whole bucket to understand that it wasn’t worth it
      I just had a trailer for the movie
  31. a.sirin
    a.sirin 29 January 2018 18: 52
    +2
    I looked ... a rather weak film ... Kurylenko, as always, is perfect and sexy ... After watching, there was nothing left - neither bad nor good. Something dirty, something vicious - but quite in moderation.
    If it were not for the cries of “forbid! Offends!”, The film would pass unnoticed and be forgotten
  32. grafin
    grafin 30 January 2018 00: 28
    +1
    at the marshal, then two Orders of Victory .... the coolest cool to see from the Romanian king took off the second ...
  33. kig
    kig 30 January 2018 00: 40
    +2
    There is a lot of tantrum, but not a single intelligible explanation of what exactly is wrong with the film. It seems that the author did not see him.
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 30 January 2018 08: 36
      0
      Quote: kig
      but not a single intelligible explanation of what exactly is wrong with the film.

      Do you need to explain this ?!
      then read Marshak
      "The baby son came to his father, and asked the baby: - ​​What is good and what is bad?"
      1. kig
        kig 31 January 2018 02: 00
        +1
        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir

        and you need to explain it

        I fully admit that the film is bad and someone does not like it. But what exactly is absolutely not understood from the article, except that the author is sharply against it. And nothing concrete is explained. Therefore, I suppose that the author did not even watch this film.
  34. Antares
    Antares 30 January 2018 12: 24
    +1
    Ban is a hidden ad!
    The ban method NEVER works. Expression-forbidden fruit, familiar?
    Assuming a war for history is forbidden in your head, you are not giving anything in return. If you want to educate those who think, prohibitions will only harm. It is up to the person to decide, and not wait for favors from above, state permits, and others ..
    And you can watch all the forbidden things on the Internet. And there you can decide right or wrong.
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 30 January 2018 13: 35
      0
      Quote: Antares
      Ban is a hidden ad!

      PANCAKE
      no one forbade, there is a desire to watch this look at home
  35. chewi
    chewi 30 January 2018 13: 56
    +1
    The hysterical reaction of Putin-Stalinist rat pups and the prohibition of the film is the best recommendation for watching it, of course. Thanks cotton for advertising))
    1. The comment was deleted.
  36. Dr_engie
    Dr_engie 31 January 2018 07: 59
    +1
    Of course, I'm sorry, but I had more negative emotions than any Western film last year’s domestic cinema, where in the movie theater (!) They showed a sidebar for 10 minutes (and these are real chronicles) about how two guys during the Chechen war, they cut the throat of the Russian soldiers, and before that they shout that they do not want to die and ask that they be kept alive.
    Well, you'd better look at such domestic creations. But for me, this film simply crossed out all domestic cinema forever and I can’t fundamentally watch it anymore.
    The film "Cramped", if that. Take a look at your leisure that we have removed. And then look at the side. After it, even the most fierce foreign trash will seem like an exemplary movie. And nothing, they gave the rental and showed it in the movies.
    And comedies should be treated accordingly, a shame. So soon offer to plant jokes about Stalin.
  37. Normal ok
    Normal ok 31 January 2018 15: 01
    0
    The film is like a film. There are many films worse. Just the hysteria around the movie has recently become a trend.
  38. Dobriy_chelvek
    Dobriy_chelvek 1 February 2018 05: 43
    0
    The author of course said everything correctly, except for one. Young people are spoiled by modern education — I don’t remember something that the Soviet youth went to defend it in '91, and didn’t the young people then actively participate in all interethnic and interethnic conflicts for the post of the USSR? not that owl. youth from the sports reserve created organized crime groups and became lads? So it’s not necessary for young people, now the “missing generation” of the 90s is working hard and is doing the country's economy, although they were written down to the missing people at once.
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 1 February 2018 08: 46
      0
      Quote: Dobriy_Chelovek
      I don’t remember something, so that the Soviet youth went to defend him in '91

      so in 91 we were all very cunningly presented, they say they just changed their name
  39. Berkut
    Berkut 3 February 2018 00: 38
    0
    How pleasant it is to read such a revealing Mayer signed by NIK and not by the name of the author